Spacing of children in Switzerland: constancy or change? Marion Burkimsher Affiliated to University...
-
Upload
sandra-gibson -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Spacing of children in Switzerland: constancy or change? Marion Burkimsher Affiliated to University...
Spacing of children in Switzerland:
constancy or change?
Marion Burkimsher
Affiliated to
University of Lausanne
Change in mean age at birth of each birth order 1969-2007
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
19691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009Year
Age of mother
1st birth 2nd birth 3rd birth 4th birth 5th+ birth
Source BEVNAT
Birth spacing - what and why?
• Not difference in mean age of successive birth ordersNot difference in mean age of successive birth orders
• Can obtain spacing data from surveys (or census data), but not Can obtain spacing data from surveys (or census data), but not
birth registration by birth orderbirth registration by birth order
• Why these are different…(women who end up having bigger Why these are different…(women who end up having bigger
families start childbearing at a younger age; women who start later families start childbearing at a younger age; women who start later
have fewer children)have fewer children)
• With birth spacing data (probability of subsequent birth knowing With birth spacing data (probability of subsequent birth knowing
duration since last birth) - and female population by parity & age - duration since last birth) - and female population by parity & age -
can make good TFR projections by McDonald-Kippen methodcan make good TFR projections by McDonald-Kippen method
Differences in mean age at nth and (n+1)th birth
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
19691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009
Years
1st-2nd birth 2nd-3rd birth 3rd-4th birth
Source BEVNAT
Change in standard deviation of age at birth
3.8
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
19691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009Year
Standard deviation, years
Birth order 1 Birth order 2 Birth order 3 Birth order 4 Birth order 5+
Source BEVNAT
Example of erroneous deduction: spacing in SwitzerlandExample of erroneous deduction: spacing in Switzerland
FFS sample data from 1994 for women aged 40-44FFS sample data from 1994 for women aged 40-44
ie. cohorts 1950-1954ie. cohorts 1950-1954
Mean age at 1st birth 26.9Mean age at 1st birth 26.9
Mean spacing 1st-2nd child: 3.13 yearsMean spacing 1st-2nd child: 3.13 years
Mean spacing 2nd-3rd child: 3.62 yearsMean spacing 2nd-3rd child: 3.62 years
Mean spacing 3rd-4th child: 3.13 yearsMean spacing 3rd-4th child: 3.13 years
Houle & Shkolnikov, 2006 then made the following Houle & Shkolnikov, 2006 then made the following incorrectincorrect deductions using age at 1st birth as the starting point:deductions using age at 1st birth as the starting point:
Deduced mean age at 2nd birth 30.0Deduced mean age at 2nd birth 30.0
Deduced mean age at 3rd birth 33.6Deduced mean age at 3rd birth 33.6
Deduced mean age at 4th birth 36.8Deduced mean age at 4th birth 36.8
RestatingRestating……
We cannot deduce anything about birth spacing from differences We cannot deduce anything about birth spacing from differences in mean age at successive birth orders!in mean age at successive birth orders!
We cannot deduce anything about mean age of successive birth We cannot deduce anything about mean age of successive birth orders from information on birth spacing!orders from information on birth spacing!
Why?Why?
Because women who have their first child at a younger age have Because women who have their first child at a younger age have more likelihood of having a larger family than women who start at more likelihood of having a larger family than women who start at a later age.a later age.
This is easier to understand with an illustration…This is easier to understand with an illustration…
2525 2828 3131 3434
Mean age at 1st birth: 25Mean age at 1st birth: 25Mean age at 2nd birth: 28Mean age at 2nd birth: 28Mean age at 3rd birth: 31Mean age at 3rd birth: 31Mean age at 4th birth: 34Mean age at 4th birth: 34
Mean spacing between all Mean spacing between all birth orders: 3 yearsbirth orders: 3 years
Mean age at last birth: Mean age at last birth: 29.529.5
AgeAge
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Scenario 1: Scenario 1: 4 women, having 1, 2, 3 and 4 children respectively4 women, having 1, 2, 3 and 4 children respectively
2525 2828 3131 3434
Mean age at 1st birth: 29.5Mean age at 1st birth: 29.5Mean age at 2nd birth: 31Mean age at 2nd birth: 31Mean age at 3rd birth: 32.5Mean age at 3rd birth: 32.5Mean age at 4th birth: 34Mean age at 4th birth: 34
Mean spacing between all Mean spacing between all birth orders: 3 yearsbirth orders: 3 years
Mean age at last birth: 34Mean age at last birth: 34
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
AgeAge
Scenario 2: Scenario 2: 4 women, having 1, 2, 3 and 4 children respectively4 women, having 1, 2, 3 and 4 children respectively
Hypothesis
That between 1969 and the present time there has been a
transition from Scenario 1 being the norm to Scenario 2.
But we need birth spacing data…
Using data from SHP
• Data about cohabiting children had to be combined with data on (older) children who had moved out of the household
• Frequency curves of spacing are skewed; modal gap < median gap < mean gap
• Likelihood of going on to a 2nd / 3rd child changes over time
• Solution - survival analysis, life table method (as only whole year data)
• Survival analysis gives:
1. change in intensity
2. change in ultimate likelihood
3. median duration of transition (if >50% experience it)
Interesting statistics from SHP sample
Longest gap 1st-2nd for a woman is 18 years
Longest gap 1st-2nd for a man is 32 years
Longest gap 2nd-3rd for a woman is 31 years!
Longest gap 2nd-3rd for a man is 25 years
Range, age at 1st birth, woman - 15-54 years
Range, age at 1st birth, man - 12-59 years
Range, age at 2nd birth, woman - 17-49 years
Range, age at 2nd birth, man - 16-59 years
…as men have no upper bound, only look at women’s rates …
Frequency curve for 2nd child after 1stand 3rd child after 2nd by duration
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Number of years after 1st/2nd child
Probability of 2nd/3rd birth
1960s 2nd child
1970s 2nd child
1980s 2nd child
1990s 2nd child
1960s 3rd child
1970s 3rd child
1980s 3rd child
1990s 3rd child
Modal gap 1st-2nd & 2nd-3rd is
2 years
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Median gap
% no 2nd
1960s 3.3 20
1970s 3.5 18
1980s 3.3 17
1990s 3.3 18
2000> 3.6 22
No significant change in
1st-2nd gap from 1960s to present day!
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
But significant changes for 2nd-3rd child
transition!
How does age of mother affect spacing?
…remembering that age at childbearing has been rising over time
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Significantly less likelihood
of women having a 2nd
child if over 35 when 1st born
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Very significant difference in likelihood of
woman having 3rd child if her
2nd born before/after 30
Various potential determinants 1st-2nd likelihood 2nd-3rd likelihood Decade of birth of 1st/2nd child
Yes, >2000 s lightly lower Yes, 1960s higher intensity
Age of mother at bi rth of 1st/2nd
Yes, older mothers lower Yes, older mothers lower
Religious attendance Yes, regular attenders higher
Yes, very signif. diffs.
Education level (3 groups) Not significant Yes, low ed., higher intensity
Gender of 1st child Not significant - Linguistic areas Slight
German>French>Italian German>French>Italian
1st 2 children twins - Yes, higher if twins Mother born in CH Slight, higher if born in
CH Yes, higher if born in CH
Cannot yet confirm or deny hypothesis
Initial investigations encouraging…
SHP is only up-to-date data source on birth spacing in
Switzerland
More work to be done…
Spacing of children in Switzerland:
constancy or change?
• 1st-2nd child transition > constancy
• 2nd-3rd child transition > change (decline in likelihood)