Space Weather Effects and Consequences. The case of MOPITT on board of Terra spacecraft. Florian...
-
Upload
harmony-leighton -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of Space Weather Effects and Consequences. The case of MOPITT on board of Terra spacecraft. Florian...
Space Weather
Effects and Consequences.
The case of MOPITT on board of Terra spacecraft.
Florian NichitiuDepartment of Physics, University of Toronto, Canada
July 2004-Frascati
Space Climate/Weather Space Climate/Weather refers to changes in the space environment and effects that those changes have on Earth and mankind’s activities.These affect Earth climate on various temporal and spatial scale as well as communications, navigation and many other space and ground based systems.
Space Climate or Climate in near-Earth space is characterized for long-term observations of space environment. Space Weather refers for short-term , very dynamic and highly variable conditions in the geo-space environment.
• Impact on Solar Physics ( with consequences even for fundamental particle physics; for example neutrino oscillation problem: SNO, Canada)
• It is important in order to improve our understanding of the Earth’s climate and weather in relation with (some time) controversial problem of signatures of solar activity variability in meteorological parameters, Earth’s atmosphere chemistry and long term trends in Earth’s Climate.
• Big impact on space technology.Need to have Space Weather nowcast and forecast . The very complex radiation effects on spacecraft systems and instruments, end even on Earth technology are influenced by Space Weather induced variations in the Earth’s space environment
Sun - Geospace environmentSources of Space Weather Sun : EM radiation & particle radiation Galactic Cosmic Rays
Indicators of Solar activity Solar and geomagnetic indices are used to describe the activity levels of the Sun and the disturbance of the geomagnetic field.
• Sun Spot Number(SSN)
• Solar Radio emissions : Flux of 10.7 cm ( Ottawa index). Are essential measurements of the total amount of thermal emissions from chromosphere and lower corona.The F107 index gives a good measure of the UV radiation output ( new E107).
There are suggestions that 10.7 cm flux is also an excellent indicator of magnetic activity
on the Sun.
• UV flux, irradiance.
• Magnetic indices ( aa, Ap, Kp, Dst, etc..).Geomagnetic indices typically describe the variations of the geomagnetic field over a certain time period.They provide a measure of the disturbance of the magnetosphere which has direct consequences for the charged particle space environment.
• Trapped proton and electron fluxes
• Galactic Cosmic Rays, protons of very high energy and neutrons fluxes.Flux periodicity correlated with IMF and erosion effect of Earth atmosphere via Solar activity.
Variations and periodicity Solar radiation as main element of space weather, varies at very different time scales.
due to solar activity due to Solar-Earth system
• ~27 days (Solar rotation)• ~11.2 years (Schwabe cycle, cycle of
solar activity)• ~22 years ( Hale cycle)
(magnetic cycle : the original magnetic polarity is restored every second 11-year)
• 80-90 years ( Gleissberg cycle) (seen by an enveloping curve of peaks of sunspot record)
• ~205 years (de Vries cycle): Sporer minima (AD 1420-1540) Maunder minima (AD 1645-1715)
• Seasonal variations (related with seasonal variations of geomagnetic activity --> variations of outer belt electron population); due to motions of the Earth around Sun (--> annual changes in the Earth’s atmosphere introduce seasonal modulation in low-altitude trapped proton population)
• Daily variations of Earth’s magnetic dipole (due to axial rotation of the Earth; angle between dipole and rotational axes ~11 deg.)
Longer cycles – important for effects related with Earth’s climate and long term trends
Space Radiation Environment
Electrons, protons and ions
Trapped by the Earth’s magnetic field :
Radiation Belts ( Van Allen Belts) e E< 2-3 MeV; p E< 200-300 MeV
Passing through the solar system :
Solar Wind ( e, p He4 ) E< 100 KeV Solar Particle Events mainly protons E = 1 - >100 MeV Galactic Cosmic Rays E up to TeV
Radiation Belts-Oct and Nov 1957 : Sputniks 1 & 2 ( SU)
-Jan 1958 : Explorer 1 ( US)
Expected rate 30 count/sec(Geiger-Muller counter;J van Allen)
& … zero count/sec !
-Explorer 2 =failed, BUT-March 25, 1958 Explorer 3: 30 /s ; increase to 128 /s (max on tape) then to zero c/s and again to 128. Near the perigee, back to expected 30c/sErnest Ray :“My God, space is radioactive !”
1) Circular motions with gyro-radius about the field line : T~ milliseconds2) Bounce back and forth along a field line.Reversing direction at a mirror point: T~ seconds.3) Drift of particles around the Earth: T~ one hour. Electrons drift to east, protons drift to west
A charged particle became trapped in those regions where the magnetic fieldlines are closed
There are two main belts:I- inner belt : e and p ( up to 2.4 Re)II- outer belt : e (2.8 – 12 Re)
Inner & outer belts
I II I
The Earth’s magnetic field is not symmetric
South Atlantic Anomaly ( also called Brazilian Anomaly or Capetown Anomaly) is a lowest magnetic field region located at 26S, 53W.
SAA is frequently said is due to the
The tilt of the dipole axis with respect to the rotational axis
And due to the displacementof the geomagnetic axis from the center of the Earth
Electrons AE-8 Protons AP-8
Radiation Belt Models
Plasma and Solar WindContinuous flux of particles ( e, p, He) from sun;(Expanding magnetized plasma generated by the Sun) -characterized mainly by speed and density.
Geomagnetic activity is controlled by the solar wind speed and IMF orientation. An important parameter:
Bz oscillation and a ‘turn’ to <0 values magnetic storm(Kp>5)
Electron enhancements- tendency to occur at the solar rotation period (27 days)
Strong correlation between electron precipitations (E>30 keV) at polar orbit and solar wind speed at 1 UA.-consequences for physico-chemistry parameters of the atmosphere.
Solar Energetic ParticlesSEP or SPE (Solar Proton Events)
( Solar Cosmic Rays)Origin: Solar flares and Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) p, e & He emitted by the sun in burst during ‘solar storms’ -energies > 10 MeV/nucleon -access to open magnetic fields of polar cap.Produce also : X-rays; gamma-rays, UV light burst and very fast wind flow which can inject protons into the trapping region ( even create ‘second proton belt’)
Fluence: from 10^5 to 10^11 part/cm^2
Duration of event: from one to several days
“Bastilia” Solar Event 14 July 2000
SPE Periodicity: Frequency spectra of solar proton fluence of Energy > 30 MeV periods of ~ 11 years and 3-4 years. Impossible to predict
-greater occurrence frequency during maximum solar activity- and during decline of cycle
NASA SOHO Image Solar Flare
Cosmic RaysGalactic Cosmic Rays: fully ionized particles of all stable elements (90% p ~7% He) Origin: galactic and extragalactic; Energies up to TeV Energy spectrum max at 0.3-1 GeV/nucleon The incoming charged particles are ‘modulated’ by the solar wind and IMF which decelerates and partially excludes the lower energy GCR from the inner solar system. There is a significant anticorrelation between solar activity and the intensity of the CR with E< 10 GeV.
Variations of proton counts E=80-215 MeV of MEPED detectoraboard the TIROS/NOAA spacecraft
Natural Albedo RadiationIs in fact the secondary radiation generated in the inner magnetosphere due to:
-nuclear reactions by GCR and SPE interactions with : - protons of the inner belt - and atoms of the atmosphere-secondary CR decay ( pions, muons..)This radiation component consists mostly of: - neutrons - e- and e+ - protons ( and antiprotons) , nuclei
There is also an anticorrelation between solar activity and the intensity ofsecondary radiation as a result of atmosphere expanding ( and increasing of nuclear interaction rate) during high solar activity.
Short term variations of Albedo Radiation
-When the Sun releases a large burst of matter and magnetic disturbance amagnetic storm which prevent many cosmic rays from entering the atmosphere.Forbush decrease detected bythe Inuvik neutron monitor at 23 Mar 1991.
“Solar cosmic rays” producedby a solar flare are recorded as a sharpincrease in secondary neutrons flux. The event of May 24, 1990 seenby Inuvik, Deep River and Goose Bay neutron monitors.
Low energy particles- correlated with SA
High energy particles- anti-correlated with SA
Solar Activity
Effects
on
Spacecraft
and
instruments
Solar irradiance- correlated with SA
Neutron Flux- anti-correlated with SA
Neutrons cosmogenic radionuclides (14C,10Be,36Cl) : extend record of Solar Activity : signal of past climate variations
Effects onEarth Climate
Radiation effect on spacecraft systems and instruments
Spacecraft anomalies: from -------- easily recovered to -------- total mission failure origin: -- engineering (operation fault, mechanism failure and ageing) -- space weather which simulate engineering faults— BUT not only
Based upon the effect upon the s/c :
Surface charging | Photonics noise Deep dielectric charging | Total dose effects Single Event Upset (SEU) | Material degradation Solar radio frequency interference | Spacecraft drag
Surface Charging
S/C immersed in a cool, dense plasma e, ions, secondary emitted particles: photoelectrons and backscattered electrons Gives net s/c potentialAnd this lead to discharges noise into the system; false command, change the physical characteristics of subsystems.Occurs predominantly during geomagnetic storms ( for K index >=6)NightDay transitions are especially problematic during storms: photoelectric effectis abruptly present/absent trip discharges
There is also a strong local time asymmetry: majority Surface Charging anomalies occur
during the night
Deep dielectric charging
Is a problem primarily for high altitude s/cRelativistic electrons (E> 1MeV) can easily penetrate s/c shielding and can build up charge where they come to rest ( in dielectrics). For high electron fluxduring extended period of time abrupt discharges deep in the s/c.Discharges appear to correlate well with long periods of high fluxes.
High fluxes of these electrons vary with 11 year Solar Cycle.This variation is dictated by the nature of the sun’s output and by the character of the solar wind incident on the magnetosphere.
Was also found that the equinoctial fluxes of electrons (this is an average over 7 years) were nearly a factor of three higher than the average solstice fluxes.
Example: Anik/Intelsat (Ca) : 1994 wheel controller 1998 lost all power from solar panel array
Single Event Upset (SEU)
SEU occur when a high-energy particle penetrates s/c shielding and hit a device causing a disruption. Effects can range from simple device tripping to component latch-up or failure. Hitting memory devices result in ‘bit-flip’.SEU are normally caused by GCR and SPE and high energy trapped particles.SEU rates increase with high fluxes, but the particle energy spectrum and arrival time seen by satellites varies with the location and nature of the event on the solar disk.
Distribution of SEU over entire CRRES mission(launched July 25, 1990; returned data for ~14 months)
SEU peak occurrence frequencycorresponds to the peak of ~50MeVprotons of the inner belt.
The shoulder in distribution correspond to the peak of the secondary proton belt(from 23 Mar 1991 solar storm).
SEU attributed to Cosmic Rays
MISR camera (3 Febr—16 Febr 2000) Before cover opened(proton hits cameras designed to detect visible light)
UoSAT-2 microsatelliteSEU- (recoverable) memory upsets(from Sept 1988 to May 1992)
Satellite anomalies over SAA
SOHO LASCO C2 & C3 Images
July 14, 2000- A powerful X class flare erupted from sunspot region
9077 at approximately 10:24- it was accompanied by a full halo coronal mass ejection that is Earth directed.
April 23 2003
Bastilia Solar Event– example of High Radiation Background anomaly
SSST 1 and SSST 2 Hitsthrough J anuary 15th, 2003
-90
-60
-30
0
30
60
90
-180 -150 -120 -90 -60 -30 0 30 60 90 120 150 180
E Longitude (deg)
Pond
SSST 1
SSST 2
-150 -100 -50 0 50-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
SS
ST
1 a
nd
SS
ST
2 a
no
ma
lie
s
SAA
-48.40 Width=30.105
Longitude
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
SS
ST1
and
SS
ST2
ano
mal
ies
SAA
-24.773 Width=15.316
Latitude
TERRASolid State Star
Tracker anomalies
High Background
Device Single Events (DSE) - anomalies – occurring in a piezoelectric accelerometer within the MOPITT
(Measurements Of Pollution In The Troposphere)
instrument aboard the Terra spacecraft.
- Piezoelectric accelerometer anomalies- Location of anomalies signals- Correlation with big Solar Particle Events- Correlation with Solar Activity ( Solar Sub maximum I and II)- Conclusions and consequences
The case of MOPITT
SAA
Sun
“Terra,” is the name of the Earth Observing System (EOS) flagship satellite, launched on Dec. 18, 1999. The mission is a vital part of NASA’s Earth Science Enterprise , helping us understand and protect our home planet
Terra s/c is in a sun-synchronous polar orbit.Orbital period=98.88 min.
Altitude=705 Km.25 Jun 2004 01:41:51.36
MOPITT instrument
The vibration level is measured by two piezoelectric accelerometers
-Cooler Compressor(vibrations for x,y,z)
-Cooler Displacer(vibrations for x,y,z)
MOPITT instrument is an infraredgas correlation radiometer.It operateswith eight channels : for CO and CH4.Infrared detectors need to be cooled toless than 100 K ( by Stirling Cycle Coolers with two Compressors and two Displacers mounted back to back).
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.616229.58
16229.60
16229.62
16229.64
16229.66
16229.68
16229.70
16229.72
16229.74
Tim
e (d
ays)
Vibration (N)
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
Selection limit
Width=0.03 NAverage=018 N
-0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
LOG
(N)
LOG(Vibration intensity)
Intensity (Vibration) distribution all events
A -0.48533 0.14097B -5.03397 0.44251
MOPITT Accelerometer anomalies
109.112 109.114 109.116 109.118 109.120 109.122 109.124 109.126
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Co
mp
resso
r Z
vib
rati
on
DOY 110 (2003)
DOY 109 (2003) Comp Z Vib
110.072 110.074 110.076 110.078 110.080 110.082 110.084
Comp Z Vib
Multi-component force measurementsKistler: K-Shear accelerometer.Sensing element: quartz crystal
-80-60
-40
-20
0-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Nr
of E
vents
Location of MOPITT accelerometer anomalies
Total time: 993 days; Daily rate=1.06 ev/day
Total Nr events over SAA=567 ( 54%)SAA rate= 0.57 ev/day
MOPITT spend only 6.25% of time over SAA SAA rate=9.14 ev/day
South Atlantic Anomaly seen by MOPITT
MOPITT Accelerometer Anomalies are caused by the radiation environment
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 1500
5
10
15
20
25South Pole events (Long >65S) 63.470
Width=77.913-65.721 Width=66.199
Nr
of
even
ts
Longitude
SAA events = 54 %Background = 20.4%Poles ( +/- 65 ) = 25.6 %; North/South (poles) asymmetry=0.43
-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Lati
tud
e
Nr of events
-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Nr
of e
vent
s
Longitude
MOPITT Accelerometer Anomalies in South Atlantic Anomaly region
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 00
10
20
30
40
50
60
SAACenter Width---------------------------26.065 16.675
Nr o
f eve
nts
Latitude
-80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 00
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
SAA
Nr
of
even
ts
Longitude
Center Width--------------------------47.395 28.418
Day – Night Asymmetry SAA: Day/Night = 0.72 During the Night: Lat & Long widths increase with 2-3 deg.
0 200 400 600 800 10000.00E+000
5.00E+008
1.00E+009
1.50E+009
2.00E+009
2.50E+009
3.00E+009
Proton Flux p E>1 MeV p E>10 MeV
DOY (from 2000)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
N1
Y3
N1Y2
Y1
DOY (from 2000)
DS
E d
aily
rat
e
0 200 400 600 800 10000
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
12000000
14000000
DOY (from 2000)
Y2Y1
Proton Flux
DS
E d
aily
rat
e
p E>100 MeV
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Y3
Solar Protons EventsDetected by MOPITT accelerometer
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Average daily rate=
Daily Rate for Mopitt Accelerometer Anomalies
+/- 0.041861.05734
Dai
ly R
ate
DOY(from 2000)
Doy ( Date ) # of DSE < # >196 (July 14 2000) 8 1.03 Y1197 (July 15 2000) 11 1.03 Y1314 (Nov. 9 2000) 7 0.67 Y2634 (Sept 25 2001) 3 1.24 N1676 (Nov 6 2001) 16 1.59 Y3694 (Nov 24 2001) 3 1.78 N2
Y1
Y2
Y3
Solar Proton Events
Max p Flux [pfu] @
>10 MeV >100 MeV
Y1 Jul 14/15: 2000 24000 410
Y2 Nov 09: 2000 14800 347
N1 Sept 25: 2001 12900 31
Y3 Nov 06: 2001 31700 253
N2 Nov 24: 2001 18900 4
-Solar Proton Events ( from ftp://ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/ ,
http://www.sel.noaa.gov/weekly/)
1 pfu = 1part/(cm^2 s sr)
MOPITT Accelerometer detect SPE at 6 Nov (during the second peak of proton flux)
even if the Solar Event start at 4 Nov
The Proton Monitor data consists of counting rates in a MicroChannel Plate (MCP).The PM MCP responds to secondaries generated by ions with incident energies > 50 MeV and electrons with incident energies > 2 MeV.
CELIAS/MTOF Proton Monitor on the SOHO Spacecraft
4-7 Nov 2001 22-25 Nov 2001
Seen by MOPITT Acc ( Y3)
NOT Seen by MOPITT Acc ( N2)
1386 1389 1392 1395 1398 1401 1404 1407 14100
2
4
6
8
DS
E/D
ay
DOY(2000)
DSE/Day
100
150
200
250
300
29 Oct 2003
F107
29 Oct 2003 Solar Proton Event
Max Proton Flux (pfu) > 10 MeV > 100 MeV 29/10 : 29500 186 30/10 : 3300 110
MOPITT DSE Total # # /Day 29/10 : 9 2.15 30/10 : 7 2.15
This SPE induced a high daily rate for MOPITT DSE on two consecutive days when, as in previous cases, the high energy component (>100 MeV) reaches a large value. These MOPITT DSEs are also located on the polar regions.
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5p
+ (
#10^
10/c
m^
2)
Energy (MeV)
GOES-10 DataEvent Accumulated Fluence
Y1 Y2 Y3 N1 N2
30 35 40 45 500.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
SPE not dedected by Mopitt
SPE dedected by Mopitt
GOES-10 DataEvent Accumulated Fluence Y1
Y2 Y3 N1 N2
p+
(#1
0^10
/cm
^2)
Energy (MeV)
SPE detected by MOPITT. Energy dependence
0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
N1N2
Y2
Y3
Y1
Mo
pit
t #
DS
E d
uri
ng
SP
E
SPE fluence (E> 15 MeV) (in units of 10^10 particles/cm^2)
(25 Sept. & 23 Nov 2001)
(9 Nov 2000)
(6 Nov 2001)
(14/15 July 2000) Correlation between number of DSE during SPEs and the SPE proton fluence for E> 15 MeV . Y# and N# refer to SPEs identified in previous Table .
The energetic particles detected by the MOPITT (piezoelectric) accelerometer are mainly high energy protons
-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Night Day
La
titu
de
Longitude
Mopitt DSE location during intense SPE
MOPITT Accelerometer Anomalies during intense SPE
- are caused by high energy charged particles precipitating via ‘pole horns’. - more events during the Day
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Nov 6, 2001
Nov 9, 2000
Jul 14 & 15, 2000
Event distribution over the poles
DS
E d
aily
rat
e
Doy (from 2000)
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
0
50
100
150
200
SC #21 SC #22 SC #23
SS
N
Year1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
SS
N
Year
Double Solar Maximum Cycle #23
2000.0 2000.5 2001.0 2001.5 2002.0 2002.5 2003.0100
110
120
130
140
Year R
I SS
N
F1
0.7
160
170
180
190
200
0 20 40 60 80 100 12060
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
From 1997 (Solar Activity min)
Sol
ar R
adio
Flu
x F
10.7
cm
SI SSN
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 20030
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
The sun radio emission at a wavelength of 10.7 cm and sun spot number
Max of SC #23
F1
0.7
RI S
SN
Year
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
During High Solar Activity period ( II sub-max) the relative contribution of trapped particles in SAA decrease from ~70% to ~40%, Background remain almost constant(~20%) and Poles contribution increase (from ~15% to ~40%).This is a consequence of direct injection of more high energy particles (via poles) duringHigh Solar Activity.
Correlation with Solar activity
There is an overall increase ( ~ two times) of MOPITT DSE daily rate during the time period Nov 2001 – Feb 2002(second Solar sub-maximum)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
DOY (from 2000)
SAA Poles Bg
Mo
pit
t D
SE
(27
day
s av
erag
e)
First Sub_Max
Second Sub_Max
200 400 600 800 1000 12000.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Second Sub_Max
DOY (from 2000)
Bg contrib. Poles contrib. SAA contrib.
Rel
ativ
e co
ntr
ibu
tio
n
Correlation with Solar activity
MOPITT Accelerometer anomalies are
correlated with Solar Activity as shown by Solar centimetric Radio Flux : Ottawa index F10.7
0 200 400 600 800 1000 120040
60
80
100
120
140
First Sub_Max Second
Sub_Max
Mo
pit
t D
SE
ove
r S
AA
(27
day
s av
erag
e)
Smooth 27 average
DOY (from 2000)
SS
N (
Sm
oo
th 2
7 d
ays
aver
age)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
SAA
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
120
140
160
180
200
220
Second Sub_Max
First Sub_Max
Mo
pit
t D
SE
ove
r S
AA
(27
day
s av
erag
e)
Smooth 27 averageF10
.7 c
m (
Sm
oo
th 2
7 d
ays
aver
age)
DOY (from 2000)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
SAA
With Sun Spot Number With 10.7 cm radio flux F10.7
Summary and conclusions Analysis of MOPITT anomalous accelerometer signals shows
a direct correlation of the DSE daily rate with solar activity, a Day/Night asymmetry caused probably by interaction of trapped particles with the neutral atmosphere, and a direct correlation with high intensity solar proton events (SPEs). The high energy particles – the source of anomalous accelerometer signals- are localized mainly in SAA region, but the polar regions, particularly the southern pole, are also regions of higher risk for satellites mainly during intense SPEs.
We have also found that at least during the Solar maximum, there is a correlation of the particle population responsible for DSEs in the piezoelectric accelerometer with solar activity as expressed better by the F10.7 than the SSN.
During the second sub-maximum of Solar Cycle SC23, the fraction of events over the poles relative to the SAA region increase, which mean that, probable there are more high-energy particles of non-trapped origin in this time interval, and a good proxy of Solar activity for this purpose is the F10.7 Solar Radio Flux index.
The paper: Solar Particle Events seen by MOPITT instrument by: F. Nichitiu, J.R. Drummond, F.Zou,R.Deschambault has been accepted for publication in Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
MOPITT mission and data analysis are supported by the Canadian Space Agency (CSA), Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
E N D
Message : including Space Environment Sensors on satellites is a difficult idea to sell to management (because of cost/weight/power penalty) BUT with very good benefits