Soybean Value Chain Research Innovation Lab for Feed the Future … · 2016-03-16 · Seed...
Transcript of Soybean Value Chain Research Innovation Lab for Feed the Future … · 2016-03-16 · Seed...
Feed the Future Innovation Lab for
Soybean Value Chain Research
Foundations for Soybean in Africa
Soybeans in Africa: The Soybean Innovation Lab
PI: Peter Goldsmith, Ag. Economist, University of Illinois
University of Missouri
Mississippi State University
University of Georgia
Why sub-Saharan Africa?
Stunting inchildren under 5
Nutritionally insecure
Why sub-Saharan Africa?Low production
90% from small farmsLack of inputsLack of good varietiesLack of markets
Soybeans in Africa: The Soybean Innovation Lab
Plant Breeder EducationGrain and Seed QualitySeed ProductionUtilization for Human NutritionUtilization for LivestockEconomic ImpactsGender ImpactsEnvironmental Impacts
Soybeans in Africa: The Soybean Innovation Lab
Production: Dan Reynolds and George Awuni Mississippi State
Plant Breeding: Brian Diers and Randy Nelson University of Illinois and USDA-ARS
1920 2420 2920 3420 39200
2
4
6
8
10
12
Yie
ld k
g/h
a
Year
US soybean yield
Africa soybean yield
The SMART Farms Soybean Management withAppropriate Research and Technology
Research
Planting date
Varieties
Soil amendments
Phosphorus
Inoculum
Planting methods
Click icon to add picture
YIE
LD
(B
U/a
)Yield-Phosphorus/Inoculum
Per
cen
tage
ger
min
atio
nSeed Germination Test
IITA is a major partnerDeveloping experimental lines
Testing experimental lines
Lack of continuity
Current limitationsFew breeding programs
Small breeding programs
Lack of experience
No mechanization
Few basic supplies
Little coordination
Germplasm
Progress in Breeding Programs
• Evaluation of germplasm provided •U.S., Brazilian, and Chinese varieties
Variety US MGDays to
MaturityDays to
Flowering Plant Ht.Yield(t/ha)
5002T V 141 53 69 4.6Ozark V 123 50 60 4.3Motte VIII 118 46 50 4.1KS4895 IV 123 48 51 4.0Delsoy 4710 IV 117 39 57 3.9AFGAT Chk 140 70 90 3.8KS3494 III 116 41 48 3.7Clark 63-K Chk 136 69 62 3.6
Performance of US Germplasm in Ethiopia
Variety US MGDays to
MaturityDays to
Flowering Plant Ht.Yield(t/ha)
5002T V 141 53 69 4.6Ozark V 123 50 60 4.3Motte VIII 118 46 50 4.1KS4895 IV 123 48 51 4.0Delsoy 4710 IV 117 39 57 3.9AFGAT Chk 140 70 90 3.8KS3494 III 116 41 48 3.7Clark 63-K Chk 136 69 62 3.6
Performance of US Germplasm in Ethiopia
Variety US MGDays to
MaturityDays to
Flowering Plant Ht.Yield(t/ha)
5002T V 141 53 69 4.6Ozark V 123 50 60 4.3Motte VIII 118 46 50 4.1KS4895 IV 123 48 51 4.0Delsoy 4710 IV 117 39 57 3.9AFGAT Chk 140 70 90 3.8KS3494 III 116 41 48 3.7Clark 63-K Chk 136 69 62 3.6
Performance of US Germplasm in Ethiopia
Variety US MGDays to
MaturityDays to
Flowering Plant Ht.Yield(t/ha)
5002T V 141 53 69 4.6Ozark V 123 50 60 4.3Motte VIII 118 46 50 4.1KS4895 IV 123 48 51 4.0Delsoy 4710 IV 117 39 57 3.9AFGAT Chk 140 70 90 3.8KS3494 III 116 41 48 3.7Clark 63-K Chk 136 69 62 3.6
Performance of US Germplasm in Ethiopia
Variety US MGDays to
MaturityDays to
Flowering Plant Ht.Yield(t/ha)
5002T V 141 53 69 4.6Ozark V 123 50 60 4.3Motte VIII 118 46 50 4.1KS4895 IV 123 48 51 4.0Delsoy 4710 IV 117 39 57 3.9AFGAT Chk 140 70 90 3.8KS3494 III 116 41 48 3.7Clark 63-K Chk 136 69 62 3.6
Performance of US Germplasm in Ethiopia
Variety US MGDays to
MaturityDays to
Flowering Plant Ht.Yield(t/ha)
5002T V 141 53 69 4.6Ozark V 123 50 60 4.3Motte VIII 118 46 50 4.1KS4895 IV 123 48 51 4.0Delsoy 4710 IV 117 39 57 3.9AFGAT Chk 140 70 90 3.8KS3494 III 116 41 48 3.7Clark 63-K Chk 136 69 62 3.6
Performance of US Germplasm in Ethiopia
Variety US MGDays to
MaturityDays to
Flowering Plant Ht.Yield(t/ha)
5002T V 141 53 69 4.6Ozark V 123 50 60 4.3Motte VIII 118 46 50 4.1KS4895 IV 123 48 51 4.0Delsoy 4710 IV 117 39 57 3.9AFGAT Chk 140 70 90 3.8KS3494 III 116 41 48 3.7Clark 63-K Chk 136 69 62 3.6
Performance of US Germplasm in Ethiopia
Variety US MGDays to
MaturityDays to
Flowering Plant Ht.Yield(t/ha)
5002T V 141 53 69 4.6Ozark V 123 50 60 4.3Motte VIII 118 46 50 4.1KS4895 IV 123 48 51 4.0Delsoy 4710 IV 117 39 57 3.9AFGAT Chk 140 70 90 3.8KS3494 III 116 41 48 3.7Clark 63-K Chk 136 69 62 3.6
Performance of US Germplasm in Ethiopia
Progress in Breeding Programs
• Evaluation of germplasm provided •U.S., Brazilian, and Chinese varieties•Rust resistance germplasm•Resistance to stink bugs• F2 populations from U.S. /African crosses
Inoculum persistence studyHot, dry off-season in GhanaGhana and US varieties
InoculumCommercial5 selected USDA strainsNo inoculum
Non-inoculated cowpea varietyRotation
Continuous soybeanSoybean/corn/soybean
Progress in Breeding Programs• Number of parents increased• Number of crosses increased•Working to increase population size• On-site, off-season nurseries / irrigation
Progress in Breeding Programs
• Effective use of threshers•Understanding thresher capabilities
Progress in Breeding Programs
• Experience in Missouri and Illinois•Changing perceptions•Creating an international team
Partnerships• Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable
Agriculture
• SeedCo, Zimbabwe
•USAID Missions
What is our job?
• Learning with our partners
• Assisting program development
• Developing self-sufficiency
http://soybeaninnovationlab.illinois.edu
Twitter: @tropicalsoylab
Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Soybean Value
Chain Research
Foundations for Soybean in Africa