Sound Absorption in Liquids in Relation to Their Physical Properties2

download Sound Absorption in Liquids in Relation to Their Physical Properties2

of 10

Transcript of Sound Absorption in Liquids in Relation to Their Physical Properties2

  • 8/11/2019 Sound Absorption in Liquids in Relation to Their Physical Properties2

    1/10

    Sound Absorption in Liquids

    In

    Relation to Their Specific Heats. I I

    B y

    S .

    P a r t h a s a r a t h y and D.

    S .

    G u r u s w a m i

    With 1Figure

    Abstract

    I t has been shown in en earlier paper that the complete formula for observed

    sound absorption is given by

    2

    ' 5

    3 3

    hich contains the factor

    (-/- - - Y ) ~

    in addition

    to

    S t o k e s - K i r c h h o f f

    term. While posit.ive and negative temperature coefficients of absorption

    cannot be explained by any of the existing theories, the new formula well

    explains both through such variation of

    y

    with temperature. In a similar

    manner absorption with pressure is accounted for. It is noticed that at the

    critical point in liquid-vapour systems the sound absorption is very great and

    t,he

    y

    also is large which accounts for large sound absorption. Similar behaviour

    is noticed in binary liquid mixtures also

    a t

    the critical temperature where

    sound absorption has been found to be enormous.

    1. Introduction

    It

    is now well-known that the observed absorption of sound in several

    liquids is far in excess of tha t predicted by St o k e s -K i r c h h o f f formula.

    There have been many attempts since then to account for this anomalous

    absorption. The various approaches, thermal relaxation, structural relaxation

    and second viscosity, have been developed by Herx fe ld and Rice1) and by

    Kneser2 ) , by Hal l3) , and by Ec ka r t 4) and by L ie ber m an n5) respectively.

    I t may be noted that the approach to the problem through relaxation and

    second viscosity are essentially different. These methods are of very limited

    application and it has been suggested th at everyone of them may play some

    part in the contribution to the absorption of sound in the medium. But it is

    essential to find out the specific conditions under which any one of them would

    I

    I

  • 8/11/2019 Sound Absorption in Liquids in Relation to Their Physical Properties2

    2/10

    288

    nnalen

    der Physik. 6 .Falge.

    B a n d

    16. 1955

    be effective and if possible by experiments to critically differentiate between

    them. These methods have been discussed in detail in the first part6) of our

    paper.

    In an earlier paper6), we have brought out the important bearing of the

    ratio of specific heats on the phenomenon of absorption of sound and therein

    we have given an empirical relationship connecting

    y

    (the ratio of specific

    heats) and the ratio of observed sound absorption to classical absorption as

    calculated on the basis of S t o k e s - K i r c h h o f f theory.

    The observed absorption at 5

    Mc.

    is given by

    a

    is the absorption coefficient,

    Y

    is the frequency,

    v

    is the velocity of sound,

    Q

    is the density,

    rj

    is the coefficient of viscosity,

    c ,

    is the spccific heat a t

    constant pressure,

    k

    is the coefficient of thermal conductivity.

    From the above relation it is clear that a high value of the ratio of specific

    heats is indicative of a high absorption coefficient. The contribution to ab-

    sorption due to viscosity and due to thermal conduction are additive and

    indcpcndcn t

    .

    In this paper we have examined whether the absorption changes with

    temperature and pressure and also its variat.ion at critical solution tempera-

    tures as recorded by earlier observers which have

    so

    far remained unaccounted

    for on the basis of several theories proposed could be satisfactorily explained

    by the new formula. Incidentally a few other consequences

    of

    the theory have

    also been followed up.

    2. Further

    Examination of Excess

    Absorption

    a) y as

    an

    additive term

    I t has been argued that the excess absorption of sound may be explained

    on the basis of second viscosity and tha t this lat ter quanti ty may not bear

    an y relation to the first viscosity. The above formula can be put in the form

    OL 0:

    i. e. it is the ratio

    -

    bs. to -- theory which is a function of

    y ,

    the ratio

    of

    specific heats. However since a high value of

    y

    is undoubtedly an indication

    of high sound absorption

    it

    was thought that

    y

    may be a function

    of

    the

    excess absorption only, thus yielding an equation

    V2

    V2

    This again shows the importance of a study of the relationship, if any, of

    sound absorption with other physical properties of the medium. In order to

    6

    S.

    Parthasarathy and

    D.

    S. Guruswamy (under publication in this Journal)

    This paper

    forms

    Part

    I

    of t,his series.

  • 8/11/2019 Sound Absorption in Liquids in Relation to Their Physical Properties2

    3/10

    S. Purthasarathy and D , S. Guruswami: Sound Absorption in Liquids. II

    289

    chech the above we have plotted the value of

    y

    against the difference

    a a. - Th- .

    VZ

    The factor

    A

    has been included to make the equation dimensionally balanced.

    In the following table are given the values of

    y

    and the absorption values,

    both experimentally obtained and those calculated on the basis of S t o k e s

    -

    Kirchhoff formula. The y values of the liquids have been obtained

    from

    thermodynamic relationships as indicated in the previous paper.

    The absorption values are mostly those of one of us

    (S.P.), S. S.

    C b a r i

    and

    D.

    Sr in ivasan ' ) . In the third column is given the difference between

    Table

    1

    Liquid

    .

    10-1

    1. Carbon disulphide

    2.

    Chloroform

    3.

    Carbon tetrachloride

    4. Benzene

    6 . Ethyl acetate

    6. Acetone

    7.

    Bromoform

    8.

    Chlorobenzene

    9.

    Toluene

    10.

    Cyclohexane

    11

    Methyl ethyl

    ketone

    12. Xylenc

    (m)

    13. Ethylene chloride

    1 4 .

    Nitrobenzene

    15. Amyl alcohol (n)

    16. Ethyl butyrate

    17.

    Amyl acetate

    18.

    Cyclohexanol

    19.

    Heptane

    (b)

    20. Acetophenone

    21.

    Hexyl alcohol

    22.

    Methyl alcohol

    23.

    Benzyl alcohol

    24. Ethyl alcohol

    25.

    Butyl alcohol (n)

    26.

    Butyl alcohol

    (iso)

    27. Mercury

    28. Water

    5,05

    10,o

    19,l

    8,25

    7,7

    6,3

    8,5

    7,6

    15,3

    7,6

    7,6

    9,o

    23,9

    13,2

    66,67

    12,4

    15,3

    119,2

    10,o

    12,8

    61,O

    14,3

    38,5

    24,6

    44,7

    43,2

    8,5

    5,05

    7700

    400

    586

    808

    190

    37

    230

    99

    123

    458

    33

    89

    136

    99

    193

    230

    234

    489

    80

    189

    192

    30,O

    159

    54

    194

    249

    6,O

    31,2

    [ 3 0 b s .

    ~

    7695

    390

    566,9

    800

    182

    31,7

    206,l

    91 5

    115,4

    442,7

    25,7

    81,4

    127

    85,s

    126

    217,6

    218,86

    370

    70

    176,2

    131,O

    15,7

    120,5

    29,4

    149,3

    215,s

    22,7

    0,95

    Y

    ~

    1,566

    1,491

    1,455

    1,447

    1,436

    1,416

    1,386

    1,366

    1,350

    1,335

    1,325

    1,319

    1,315

    1,299

    1,298

    1,287

    1,281

    1,255

    1,237

    1,225

    1 218

    1,214

    1,205

    1,204

    1,183

    1,159

    1,147

    1,007

    The relationship between

    y

    and the excess absorption has been investi-

    gated in the following graph.

    A glance a t the graph shows th at there is no relationship between

    y

    and the

    excess absorption. The spread

    of

    points is much greater and irregular for

    those liquids which do not have very high absorption. This shows tha t the

    factor A is not a constant and depends on the medium.

    It

    can possibly be a

    7

    S. Parthasarathy,

    S. S.

    Chari and

    D.

    Srinivasan,

    J.

    Physique Radium 14,

    641 (1963).

    Ann. Phrsik.

    6.

    E olge, Bd. 16

    19

  • 8/11/2019 Sound Absorption in Liquids in Relation to Their Physical Properties2

    4/10

    290

    Annulen der

    P h y s i k . 6 .

    Folge. B u d

    16. 1955

    function of density, velocity, viscosity and/or frequency.

    This

    aspect is under

    investigation. It is significant to note that though there are several liquids

    with higher than 1,40, yet they do not appear lower than z = 400 1O-l';

    for them the absorption must indeed exceed this value. Further one would

    expect to show a maximum value for

    y = 1 , 6 7

    and be very small

    N O ) for

    a) y values and their deviation from the proposed formula

    A

    glance at the graph between

    a bs./aTh.

    and

    y

    given in the previous

    paper6) (fig. 1)on the basis of formula 1 shows that a few liquids are off the

    curve A )which was taken as the best fitting curve. It was originally thought

    a

    y

    =

    1.

    150

    I

    Q

    I I I 1

    1

    0 ?OO

    zoo

    300

    400

    500 600

    bs -

    OL

    Th

    VZ

    Fig. 1

    Table 2

    Liquids

    P o i n t s t o t he l e f t

    of th e curv e

    Acetone

    . .

    . . . .

    Bromoform

    . . . . . .

    Choroform

    . . . . . .

    Carbon tetrachloride .

    .

    Ethyl acetate . . . .

    Methyl ethyl ketone

    .

    Amyl alcohol . .

    . . .

    P oi n t s t o t he r i gh t

    of

    the curve

    Cyclohexane . .

    .

    . .

    Ethyl butyrate . . . .

    Amyl acetate

    .

    . .

    Acetophenone

    . . . .

    Y

    1,42

    1,385

    1,49

    1,45

    1,435

    1,325

    1,30

    1,335

    1,29

    1,28

    1,22

    Deviation

    from

    the curve

    0,18

    0,095

    0,085

    0,06

    0,055

    0,105

    0,15

    0,05

    0 07

    0,05

    0,105

  • 8/11/2019 Sound Absorption in Liquids in Relation to Their Physical Properties2

    5/10

    8.

    Purthasarathy and

    D. S. Guruswami:

    Sound

    Absorption in Liquids. 11

    291

    that these deviations might be due to some other phenomena or property of

    the molecule affecting sound absorption. A re-examination of the y values

    obtained by different workers has suggested another plausible explanation

    ;

    as for example

    y

    for benzene has been variously given as

    1,45

    and

    1,33

    giving

    a difference of 0,12. Another example is that of cyclohexane for which we have

    obtained

    y = 1,335,

    while Philip gives

    1 ,47 .

    While the former places the

    point below the curve by a difference of 0,05 in y , the latter raises it far above

    by 0,12. The fact is perhaps that the point lies half-way which

    brings it

    nearer

    the curve. This emphasises the importance of an accurate knowledge of

    y

    especially where the gradient is medium and small i. e. in the second and

    third portions of the curve.

    The

    following Table of such liquids showed that there was little in comm on

    either among those left of the curve or among those right of it. However as

    the deviations are small, they may be attributed to inaccuracies in the values

    of

    y . It may be pointed out that the deviations in the case of water, acetone

    and acetophenone are however too much to be explained away. y values need

    to be re-determined quite accurately for all liquids.

    3. Variation of Sound Absorption with Temperatures

    The classical theory of absorption due to S to k e s leads one to expect a

    decrease in the absorption coefficient as the temperature is increased on

    account of the decrease in the kinematical viscosity with increasing tempera-

    ture. This should be true for all liquids but experiments by Pe l l a m and

    Gal t8 )have shown tha t in certain liquids a decrease and in others an increase

    of sound absorption occur with increasing temperature.

    On the thermal relaxation theory an increase of temperature increases

    the probalility of energy transfer i. e. the relaxation time t) ecomes smaller.

    The effect of this on the observed absorption depends on both the relaxation

    frequency and the frequency at which measurements are carried out. If

    and v be these frequencies then v is increased on increasing the temperature

    and in the case

    > yo, v

    shifts toward and an increased absorption results.

    If however