Sound Absorption in Liquids in Relation to Their Physical Properties2
-
Upload
sebastian-hernandez -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
0
Transcript of Sound Absorption in Liquids in Relation to Their Physical Properties2
-
8/11/2019 Sound Absorption in Liquids in Relation to Their Physical Properties2
1/10
Sound Absorption in Liquids
In
Relation to Their Specific Heats. I I
B y
S .
P a r t h a s a r a t h y and D.
S .
G u r u s w a m i
With 1Figure
Abstract
I t has been shown in en earlier paper that the complete formula for observed
sound absorption is given by
2
' 5
3 3
hich contains the factor
(-/- - - Y ) ~
in addition
to
S t o k e s - K i r c h h o f f
term. While posit.ive and negative temperature coefficients of absorption
cannot be explained by any of the existing theories, the new formula well
explains both through such variation of
y
with temperature. In a similar
manner absorption with pressure is accounted for. It is noticed that at the
critical point in liquid-vapour systems the sound absorption is very great and
t,he
y
also is large which accounts for large sound absorption. Similar behaviour
is noticed in binary liquid mixtures also
a t
the critical temperature where
sound absorption has been found to be enormous.
1. Introduction
It
is now well-known that the observed absorption of sound in several
liquids is far in excess of tha t predicted by St o k e s -K i r c h h o f f formula.
There have been many attempts since then to account for this anomalous
absorption. The various approaches, thermal relaxation, structural relaxation
and second viscosity, have been developed by Herx fe ld and Rice1) and by
Kneser2 ) , by Hal l3) , and by Ec ka r t 4) and by L ie ber m an n5) respectively.
I t may be noted that the approach to the problem through relaxation and
second viscosity are essentially different. These methods are of very limited
application and it has been suggested th at everyone of them may play some
part in the contribution to the absorption of sound in the medium. But it is
essential to find out the specific conditions under which any one of them would
I
I
-
8/11/2019 Sound Absorption in Liquids in Relation to Their Physical Properties2
2/10
288
nnalen
der Physik. 6 .Falge.
B a n d
16. 1955
be effective and if possible by experiments to critically differentiate between
them. These methods have been discussed in detail in the first part6) of our
paper.
In an earlier paper6), we have brought out the important bearing of the
ratio of specific heats on the phenomenon of absorption of sound and therein
we have given an empirical relationship connecting
y
(the ratio of specific
heats) and the ratio of observed sound absorption to classical absorption as
calculated on the basis of S t o k e s - K i r c h h o f f theory.
The observed absorption at 5
Mc.
is given by
a
is the absorption coefficient,
Y
is the frequency,
v
is the velocity of sound,
Q
is the density,
rj
is the coefficient of viscosity,
c ,
is the spccific heat a t
constant pressure,
k
is the coefficient of thermal conductivity.
From the above relation it is clear that a high value of the ratio of specific
heats is indicative of a high absorption coefficient. The contribution to ab-
sorption due to viscosity and due to thermal conduction are additive and
indcpcndcn t
.
In this paper we have examined whether the absorption changes with
temperature and pressure and also its variat.ion at critical solution tempera-
tures as recorded by earlier observers which have
so
far remained unaccounted
for on the basis of several theories proposed could be satisfactorily explained
by the new formula. Incidentally a few other consequences
of
the theory have
also been followed up.
2. Further
Examination of Excess
Absorption
a) y as
an
additive term
I t has been argued that the excess absorption of sound may be explained
on the basis of second viscosity and tha t this lat ter quanti ty may not bear
an y relation to the first viscosity. The above formula can be put in the form
OL 0:
i. e. it is the ratio
-
bs. to -- theory which is a function of
y ,
the ratio
of
specific heats. However since a high value of
y
is undoubtedly an indication
of high sound absorption
it
was thought that
y
may be a function
of
the
excess absorption only, thus yielding an equation
V2
V2
This again shows the importance of a study of the relationship, if any, of
sound absorption with other physical properties of the medium. In order to
6
S.
Parthasarathy and
D.
S. Guruswamy (under publication in this Journal)
This paper
forms
Part
I
of t,his series.
-
8/11/2019 Sound Absorption in Liquids in Relation to Their Physical Properties2
3/10
S. Purthasarathy and D , S. Guruswami: Sound Absorption in Liquids. II
289
chech the above we have plotted the value of
y
against the difference
a a. - Th- .
VZ
The factor
A
has been included to make the equation dimensionally balanced.
In the following table are given the values of
y
and the absorption values,
both experimentally obtained and those calculated on the basis of S t o k e s
-
Kirchhoff formula. The y values of the liquids have been obtained
from
thermodynamic relationships as indicated in the previous paper.
The absorption values are mostly those of one of us
(S.P.), S. S.
C b a r i
and
D.
Sr in ivasan ' ) . In the third column is given the difference between
Table
1
Liquid
.
10-1
1. Carbon disulphide
2.
Chloroform
3.
Carbon tetrachloride
4. Benzene
6 . Ethyl acetate
6. Acetone
7.
Bromoform
8.
Chlorobenzene
9.
Toluene
10.
Cyclohexane
11
Methyl ethyl
ketone
12. Xylenc
(m)
13. Ethylene chloride
1 4 .
Nitrobenzene
15. Amyl alcohol (n)
16. Ethyl butyrate
17.
Amyl acetate
18.
Cyclohexanol
19.
Heptane
(b)
20. Acetophenone
21.
Hexyl alcohol
22.
Methyl alcohol
23.
Benzyl alcohol
24. Ethyl alcohol
25.
Butyl alcohol (n)
26.
Butyl alcohol
(iso)
27. Mercury
28. Water
5,05
10,o
19,l
8,25
7,7
6,3
8,5
7,6
15,3
7,6
7,6
9,o
23,9
13,2
66,67
12,4
15,3
119,2
10,o
12,8
61,O
14,3
38,5
24,6
44,7
43,2
8,5
5,05
7700
400
586
808
190
37
230
99
123
458
33
89
136
99
193
230
234
489
80
189
192
30,O
159
54
194
249
6,O
31,2
[ 3 0 b s .
~
7695
390
566,9
800
182
31,7
206,l
91 5
115,4
442,7
25,7
81,4
127
85,s
126
217,6
218,86
370
70
176,2
131,O
15,7
120,5
29,4
149,3
215,s
22,7
0,95
Y
~
1,566
1,491
1,455
1,447
1,436
1,416
1,386
1,366
1,350
1,335
1,325
1,319
1,315
1,299
1,298
1,287
1,281
1,255
1,237
1,225
1 218
1,214
1,205
1,204
1,183
1,159
1,147
1,007
The relationship between
y
and the excess absorption has been investi-
gated in the following graph.
A glance a t the graph shows th at there is no relationship between
y
and the
excess absorption. The spread
of
points is much greater and irregular for
those liquids which do not have very high absorption. This shows tha t the
factor A is not a constant and depends on the medium.
It
can possibly be a
7
S. Parthasarathy,
S. S.
Chari and
D.
Srinivasan,
J.
Physique Radium 14,
641 (1963).
Ann. Phrsik.
6.
E olge, Bd. 16
19
-
8/11/2019 Sound Absorption in Liquids in Relation to Their Physical Properties2
4/10
290
Annulen der
P h y s i k . 6 .
Folge. B u d
16. 1955
function of density, velocity, viscosity and/or frequency.
This
aspect is under
investigation. It is significant to note that though there are several liquids
with higher than 1,40, yet they do not appear lower than z = 400 1O-l';
for them the absorption must indeed exceed this value. Further one would
expect to show a maximum value for
y = 1 , 6 7
and be very small
N O ) for
a) y values and their deviation from the proposed formula
A
glance at the graph between
a bs./aTh.
and
y
given in the previous
paper6) (fig. 1)on the basis of formula 1 shows that a few liquids are off the
curve A )which was taken as the best fitting curve. It was originally thought
a
y
=
1.
150
I
Q
I I I 1
1
0 ?OO
zoo
300
400
500 600
bs -
OL
Th
VZ
Fig. 1
Table 2
Liquids
P o i n t s t o t he l e f t
of th e curv e
Acetone
. .
. . . .
Bromoform
. . . . . .
Choroform
. . . . . .
Carbon tetrachloride .
.
Ethyl acetate . . . .
Methyl ethyl ketone
.
Amyl alcohol . .
. . .
P oi n t s t o t he r i gh t
of
the curve
Cyclohexane . .
.
. .
Ethyl butyrate . . . .
Amyl acetate
.
. .
Acetophenone
. . . .
Y
1,42
1,385
1,49
1,45
1,435
1,325
1,30
1,335
1,29
1,28
1,22
Deviation
from
the curve
0,18
0,095
0,085
0,06
0,055
0,105
0,15
0,05
0 07
0,05
0,105
-
8/11/2019 Sound Absorption in Liquids in Relation to Their Physical Properties2
5/10
8.
Purthasarathy and
D. S. Guruswami:
Sound
Absorption in Liquids. 11
291
that these deviations might be due to some other phenomena or property of
the molecule affecting sound absorption. A re-examination of the y values
obtained by different workers has suggested another plausible explanation
;
as for example
y
for benzene has been variously given as
1,45
and
1,33
giving
a difference of 0,12. Another example is that of cyclohexane for which we have
obtained
y = 1,335,
while Philip gives
1 ,47 .
While the former places the
point below the curve by a difference of 0,05 in y , the latter raises it far above
by 0,12. The fact is perhaps that the point lies half-way which
brings it
nearer
the curve. This emphasises the importance of an accurate knowledge of
y
especially where the gradient is medium and small i. e. in the second and
third portions of the curve.
The
following Table of such liquids showed that there was little in comm on
either among those left of the curve or among those right of it. However as
the deviations are small, they may be attributed to inaccuracies in the values
of
y . It may be pointed out that the deviations in the case of water, acetone
and acetophenone are however too much to be explained away. y values need
to be re-determined quite accurately for all liquids.
3. Variation of Sound Absorption with Temperatures
The classical theory of absorption due to S to k e s leads one to expect a
decrease in the absorption coefficient as the temperature is increased on
account of the decrease in the kinematical viscosity with increasing tempera-
ture. This should be true for all liquids but experiments by Pe l l a m and
Gal t8 )have shown tha t in certain liquids a decrease and in others an increase
of sound absorption occur with increasing temperature.
On the thermal relaxation theory an increase of temperature increases
the probalility of energy transfer i. e. the relaxation time t) ecomes smaller.
The effect of this on the observed absorption depends on both the relaxation
frequency and the frequency at which measurements are carried out. If
and v be these frequencies then v is increased on increasing the temperature
and in the case
> yo, v
shifts toward and an increased absorption results.
If however