Sorini Samet & Associates LLC Consulting and Government Affairs Practice ©Sorini Samet & Associates...
-
Upload
toby-barton -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Sorini Samet & Associates LLC Consulting and Government Affairs Practice ©Sorini Samet & Associates...
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com Consulting and Government Affairs Practice ©Sorini Samet & Associates LLC
700 13th Street, NW |Suite 930| Washington, DC 20005|202-393-4481 March 2013
Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)From the United States’ Policy Perspective700 13th Street, NW Suite 930
Washington, DC 20005202-393-4481
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
1) Overview2) Simultaneous Negotiations3) Fast Track/Trade Promotion Authority4) Most Difficult Hurdles
TTIP from the U.S. Perspective
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
Leaders in Global Economy
• U.S. and EU represent:– Almost half of the world’s
GDP
– Approx. 30% of world trade in goods and services
• When negotiations are complete, TTIP will be the biggest bilateral trade deal ever negotiated
Source: World Bank
*TPP (12 countries) will represent 60% of global GDP
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
Investment•U.S. and EU have directly invested more than $3.7 trillion in each other’s economy
•EU only gained competency to negotiate EU-wide foreign investment in 2009
Trade and InvestmentTrade•2012 U.S. Exports to EU
– $458 billion in goods and services• Goods - $265 billion• Services - $195 billion
– EU represented 21% of U.S. exports
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
• U.S. Goal: Elimination of all tariffs– Substantial elimination of tariffs upon entry into force, and – Transition periods where necessary for sensitive products.
• Tariffs already relatively low– Average US most-favored-nation (MFN) tariffs are 3.5%– Average EU MFN tariffs are at 5.2%
• However, in absolute terms a zero-tariff agreement is still significant– A 2010 study estimated that a full elimination of tariffs could
• Increase U.S. exports to the EU by up to $53 billion, or 17 %, and• Increase EU exports to the U.S. by up to $69 billion, or 18%.
Market Access: Goods
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
– Tariff Rates• USTR notification to Congress identifies a goal of obtaining “fully
reciprocal access to the EU market for U.S. textile and apparel products.”
• Avg U.S. MFN tariff on clothing – 11.7% (peak rate significantly higher)• Avg EU MFN tariff on clothing – 11.5% (peak rate higher)
– Rules of Origin• USTR notification highlights the establishment of rules of origin that
“ensure that duty rates under an agreement with the EU apply only to goods eligible to receive such treatment and define procedures to apply and enforce such rules.”
Market Access for Textile and Apparel
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
• U.S. industry groups and other interested parties have generally been supportive but cautiously optimistic about the deal– Support generally from business groups like U.S. Chamber of Commerce– Agricultural groups welcome the talks as long as it addresses SPS issues– NGOs like the AFL-CIO have indicated TTIP could be a beneficial agreement if
certain standards are maintained
• Congress has expressed similar sentiments– In February, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) and Ranking
Member Orrin Hatch (R-UT) laid out priorities for the agreement, emphasizing that while the agreement is “an enticing opportunity” the agreement must lower agricultural barriers and require strong intellectual property protections
– Also in February, US Senators Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Bill Nelson (D-FL) led a bipartisan group of 17 Senators in writing a letter to the Administration that welcomes the agreement but specifically calls for the elimination of unnecessary trade and regulatory barriers in all sectors, including difficult areas like agriculture
Support and Opposition
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
U.S. FTA Negotiations Began Signed Entry-into-force Senate Approval House Approval
Australia Apr-03 5/18/2004 1/1/2005 7/15/2004 7/14/2004
Bahrain 1/26/2004 9/14/2004 1/11/2006 12/13/2005 12/7/2005Canada 9/26/1985 1/2/1988 1/1/1989 9/9/1988 7/9/1988
Chile Dec-00 6/6/2003 1/1/2004 7/31/2003 7/24/2003
Colombia 5/18/2004 11/22/2006 5/15/2012 10/12/2011 10/12/2011
Costa Rica 1/8/2003 5/28/2004 1/1/2009 6/30/2005 7/28/2005
Dominican Republic 1/8/2003 5/28/2004 3/1/2007 6/30/2005 7/28/2005
El Salvador 1/8/2003 5/28/2004 3/1/2006 6/30/2005 7/28/2005
Honduras 1/8/2003 5/28/2004 4/1/2006 6/30/2005 7/28/2005Israel 1/1/1984 4/22/1985 9/1/1985 5/23/1985 5/7/1985
Guatemala 1/8/2003 5/28/2004 7/1/2006 6/30/2005 7/28/2005
NAFTA 2/5/1991 12/17/1992 1/1/1994 11/20/1993 11/17/1993
Jordan 6/6/2000 10/24/2000 12/17/2001 7/31/2001 9/24/2001
South Korea 2/2/2006 6/30/2007 3/15/2012 10/12/2011 10/12/2011
Morocco Jan-03 6/15/2004 1/1/2006 7/21/2004 6/22/2004
Nicaragua 1/8/2003 5/28/2004 4/1/2006 6/30/2005 7/28/2005Oman 11/15/2004 1/19/2006 1/1/2009 6/29/2006 7/20/2006
Panama 4/26/2004 6/28/2007 N/A 10/12/2011 10/12/2011
Peru May-04 4/12/2006 2/1/2009 11/2/2007 12/4/2007
Singapore Dec-00 5/6/2003 1/1/2004 7/31/2003 7/24/2003
Current U.S. FTAs
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)•began as expansion of Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership (TPSEP) (Signed on 6/18/2005, effective 5/28/2006)
– Chile, New Zealand, Singapore and Brunei – U.S. entered into the talks on 10/22/1008– Australia, Vietnam and Peru announced participation in
November 2008– Malaysia joined in October 2010– Canada and Mexico joined in October 2012– Japan joined in June 2013
*goal is to complete TPP by Fall 2013– “early harvest”
FTAs Being Negotiated
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
• NAFTA & Uruguay
• Budget Cuts– Furlough– DOD providing USTR flights
• Agreements already in force – which will supersede?
Simultaneous Negotiations
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
– Trade policy is developed by both the Executive and Legislative Branches of the U.S. Government
– Article I, Section 8• Gives Congress the power to “regulate commerce
with foreign nations…and to… lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises…”
– Article II, Section 2• Gives the President exclusive ability “to make
Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur”
The U.S. Constitution
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
Need for fast track
Trade Expansion Act of 1962 – Congress granted the President the authority to negotiate reduction or elimination of tariffs and required the President to submit the final agreement for Congressional Review and statement of why it was concluded
– GATT Kennedy Round (1963-1967) results required the U.S. to make changes to its domestic law for compliance•Non-tariff barriers: Customs valuation and Anti-dumping agreements
– In 1966, Congress passed a resolution opposing the “nontariff commitments” made by the Johnson Administration during the negotiations
– Led to the debate that created the …
Fast Track Authority
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
Legislative History
Trade Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-618)– The committee recognizes… that such agreements negotiated by the Executive should be given an up-or-down vote by the Congress. Our negotiators cannot be expected to accomplish the
negotiating goals.. If there are no reasonable assurances that the negotiated agreements would be voted up-or – down on their merits. Our trading partners have expressed an unwillingness to negotiate without some assurances that the Congress will consider the agreements within a definite time-frame.”
•Administration– Provided the authority to the President to create international trade agreements that affected both
tariffs and non tariff barriers – Required the President to:
• Consult with Congress (relevant committees) during negotiations • Notify Congress 90 calendar days before signing an agreement• Grant accreditation of 10 members of Congress to act as advisers to U.S. delegation of negotiators
•Congress– Limited time to consider implementing bills before they are brought to the floor– Once on the floor:
• up or down vote, cannot filibuster or add amendments
•Extended for five years, ending 1/2/1980•Presidential authority to proclaim tariff modifications expired 1/2/1982
•Participated in GATT Tokyo Round (1973-1979)
Fast Track Authority
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (P.L. 96-39)– Extended Presidential authority to enter agreements on non-tariff
barriers – Did NOT extend Presidential tariff modification authority– Extended fast track authority until January 2, 1988– Implemented the GATT Tokyo Round Agreements
The Trade and Tariff Act of 1984 (P.L. 98-573)– Added requirement that the President notify House Ways and Means and
Senate Finance Committee of intention of entering negotiations • Provided fast track denial if either Committee disapproved within 60 days
– Added that agreements that lead to tariff modifications be subject to congressional approval via implementing legislation
– Negotiated and implemented the U.S.-Israel and U.S.-Canada FTAs
Fast Track Authority
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 (OTCA) (P.L. 100-418)– Extended President’s authority to enter into agreements until 6/1/1993– Extended Fast Track procedures for agreements entered into before
6/1/1991 and if requested by President until 6/1/1993– Added ability for Congress to derail already authorized agreements under
Fast Track and to block extension of fast track past original expiration date if enough progress has not been made
– GATT Uruguay Round was concluded, after an additional extension of TPA• Special law (H.R. 1876 – P.L. 103-49) was passed to extend authority and
implementing procedures until 4/16/1994
– Negotiated and Implemented NAFTA in 1993 (P.L. 104-182)
– *expired for 8 years between 1994-2002
Fast Track Authority
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
1994-2002 Hiatus • HW&M and SF reported legislation to renew it in 1997, but
House Republicans pulled it from the floor before a vote, per the request of the Clinton Administration
• In 1998, the House voted for fast track, but the bill failed to pass (180-243) – Although both parties supported fast track, no one could agree on
how labor and environmental issues should be addressed in trade agreements negotiated under renewed authority • Republicans wanted limited coverage • Clinton Administration and Congressional D’s preferred broader coverage
• No resolutions were adopted at the WTO Ministerial meeting in Seattle in 1999
• No major trade negotiations occurred during this time
Fast Track Authority
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
Trade Act of 2002 (P.L. 107-210)• Renamed to “Trade Promotion Authority” (TPA)• Authorization to negotiate is only granted if the President determines that foreign trade is
“unduly burden(ed) and restrict(ed) and the purposes, policies, priorities and objectives of the Trade Act will be promoted” by the Trade Act of 2002
• Included labor and environmental provisions as “principle negotiating objectives” but did not mandate the inclusion of minimal enforceable labor standards in trade agreements
• Added the Congressional Oversight Group (COG) • Added Congressional ability to veto a negotiated agreement• Added 5 limitations on negotiation of agreements regarding tariff barriers• Added 9 broad trading negotiating objectives
• Implemented Chile, Singapore, Australia, Morocco, the Dominican Republic, the Central American countries, Bahrain, Oman and Peru FTAs
• Signed South Korea, Panama and Colombia FTAs• FTAs with Malaysia, Thailand, UAE and members of the South African Customs Union (SACU)
were also of interest to the United States
– *expired on July 7, 2007
Trade Promotion Authority
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
Implementation of FTAs with Korea, Colombia and Panama– Signed in 2006 and 2007– President Bush sent the Colombia FTA to the Congress
without consultation or notice– Nancy Pelosi then changed the House Rules and removed
the 90-day time table Congress had to consider– Agreements were reopened for negotiations in 2010 under
President Obama and updated agreements’ implementing legislation was passed on October 12, 2011
– Went into effect on: • Korea - March 15, 2012• Colombia - May 15, 2012• Panama – October 31, 2012
Trade Promotion Authority
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
Analysis of TPA evolution•Drastic increase of Congressional oversight and involvement throughout entire negotiation process
•Reduction of Presidential negotiating power
•“up or down” Congressional vote is no longer being applied
Trade Promotion Authority
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
• Negotiations for TPP & TTIP have successfully been initiated despite expiration of TPA• Unprecedented with the exception of WTO
Ministerial Meeting in Seattle in 1999
• Recent Congressional criticism of USTR’s lack of transparency during TPP negotiations
Trade Promotion Authority
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
This summer?
•Coupled with …– Customs Reauthorization– GSP Expiration (July 31, 2007)– MTBs
Trade Promotion Authority
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
1) Agriculture2) Government Procurement3) Regulatory Issues and Non-Tariff Barriers 4) Aircrafts (maybe)
Most Difficult Hurdles
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
• EU tariffs are generally high on agricultural goods – Examples• Dairy
– Avg U.S. MFN tariff on dairy – 19.1%– Avg EU MFN tariff on dairy – 55.2%
• Sugar– Avg U.S. MFN tariff on sugar – 16.6%– Avg EU MFN tariff on sugar – 29.1%
Agriculture
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
Agriculture
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
Agriculture
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
Sanitary and Phytosanitary sector (SPS)– Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)– Chemicals– EU's approval system for biotechnology
products– Documentation requirements on U.S. exports
of cherriesTechnical Standards•Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemical (REACH)•Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
Agriculture
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
Subsidies•Beef quotas– Never filled because of the hormone issue– Should be expanded under TTIP, but wont be
helpful unless SPS issues are also addressed
Agriculture
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
• EU draft mandate seeks access to sensitive fields of defense and security– Under the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) the US and EU
have previously opened up access to some non-sensitive defense items– US generally excludes sensitive defense and security access from its free
trade agreements
• Extensive procurement commitments may conflict with "Buy America/n" restrictions and other carve outs, including those for small businesses.
• EU political will to push for defense procurement access unclear– The draft proposal is facing opposition from some EU countries (e.g.
France) and may not be included in the final mandate or may not be pushed in the final agreement
Government Procurement
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
• EU seeking greater access to U.S., public utilities market– Challenges: Consent would need to be
obtained from state/local level in U.S. which could be a burdensome process
• EU seeking greater commitments at U.S. state/local level– According to Inside U.S. Trade, currently, only
37 of 50 U.S. states are covered under the GPA.
Government Procurement
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com
• Considered more costly and harmful than tariff barriers– EU Trade Commissioner De Gucht estimates that such barriers are
equivalent to a traditional imports tariff of 10-20%.• Goal is to reduce barriers in
– Sanitary and phytosanitary sector• E.g., EU's approval system for biotechnology products; EU ban on beef
raised with artificial growth hormones; documentation requirements on U.S. exports of cherries.
– Restrictive administration of tariff-rate quotas and other technical barriers to trade like redundant or burdensome permitting, licensing, and certification.
– Other disciplines on regulatory coherence, including early consultations on significant regulations, use of impact assessments, periodic review of existing regulatory measures, and application of good regulatory practices.
• Challenge: Harmonizing standards while still providing a high level of health, safety, and environmental protection
Regulatory Issues and NTBs
Sorini Samet & Associates LLC www.ssa-dc.com Consulting and Government Affairs Practice ©Sorini Samet & Associates LLC
700 13th Street, NW |Suite 930| Washington, DC 20005|202-393-4481 March 2013
Questions?