Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem
Transcript of Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem
![Page 1: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Some variations of
de Jongh’s theorem 2017.07.15 Workshop in Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Waseda University
Naosuke Matsuda Kanagawa Univerity
![Page 2: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Motivation and abstract
![Page 3: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Motivation and Abstract
■Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem.
[Smorinsky1973]
■Some variations of arithmetical completeness for logic of proofs.
[Iwata-Kurahashi2017]
■Arithmetical completeness for intuitionistic Logic of Proofs.
[Artemov-Iemhoff2007, Dashkov2009]
■Search for a modal logic which captures the provability predicate in Heyting Arithmetic. [Artemov-Beklemishev2005]
![Page 4: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Motivation and Abstract
■Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem.
[Smorinsky1973]
■Some variations of arithmetical completeness for logic of proofs.
[Iwata-Kurahashi2017]
■Arithmetical completeness for intuitionistic Logic of Proofs.
[Artemov-Iemhoff2007, Dashkov2009]
■Search for a modal logic which captures the provability predicate in Heyting Arithmetic. [Artemov-Beklemishev2005]
![Page 5: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Preliminary
Kripke semantics
Heyting arithmetic
Notations
![Page 6: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Heyting Arithmetic
AA : the set of Axioms of (Peano) Arithmetic
Peano Arithmetic (PA) :
Classical Logic (CL) + AA
PA ⊢ 𝛼 ⇔ AA ⊢CL 𝛼
Heyting Arithmetic (HA) :
Intuitionistic Logic (IL) + AA
HA ⊢ 𝛼 ⇔ AA ⊢IL 𝛼
An arithmetical substitution is a mapping which assigns a arithmetical sentence to a propositional variable.
![Page 7: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Kripke semantics
Kripke model 𝒦 = ⟨𝑊,≤, {ℳ𝑤}𝑤∈𝑊⟩ :
⟨𝑊,≤⟩ is a partial order
each ℳ𝑤 is a (classical) model s.t.
• 𝑤 ≤ 𝑣 ⇒ 𝐷𝑜𝑚(ℳ𝑤) ⊆ 𝐷𝑜𝑚(ℳ𝑣)
• 𝑤 ≤ 𝑣 and ℳ𝑤 ⊨ 𝛼 ⇒ ℳ𝑣 ⊨ 𝛼 for each (ℳ𝑤-)sentence 𝛼
𝒦,𝑤 ⊩ 𝛼 :
𝒦,𝑤 ⊩ 𝛼 ⇔ ℳ𝑣 ⊨ 𝛼 if 𝛼 is atomic (ℳ𝑣-)sectence
𝒦,𝑤 ⊩ 𝛼 ∧ ∨ / → 𝛽 ⇔ 𝒦, 𝑣 ⊩ 𝛼 and (or / implies) 𝒦, 𝑣 ⊩ 𝛽 for each 𝑣 ≥ 𝑤
𝒦,𝑤 ⊩ ∀(∃)𝑥𝛼 ⇔ 𝒦, 𝑣 ⊩ 𝑥 ≔ 𝑒 𝛼,
for each (some) 𝑒 ∈ 𝐷𝑜𝑚 ℳ𝑣 , for each 𝑣 ≥ 𝑤
𝒦 ⊩ 𝛼 ⇔ 𝒦,𝑤 ⊩ 𝛼 for each 𝑤 ∈ 𝑊
Γ ⊩ 𝛼 ⇔ 𝒦 ⊩ 𝛼 for each 𝒦 s.t. 𝒦 ⊩ 𝛾 for each 𝛾 ∈ Γ
Thm [Kripke 1965]
Γ ⊢𝐼𝐿 𝛼 iff Γ ⊩ 𝛼.
![Page 8: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Notations
𝜑 : propositional formula.
CPL : Classical Propositional Logic.
IPL : Intuitionistic Propositional Logic.
ℕ : standard PA model.
![Page 9: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Introduction to de Jongh’s theorem
CPL vs PA
IPL vs HA
![Page 10: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
CPL vs PA
Thm1 If ⊢𝐶𝑃𝐿 𝜑, then 𝑃𝐴 ⊢ 𝜎(𝜑) for each arithmetical substitution 𝜎.
→ very easy.
Thm2 If ⊬𝐶𝑃𝐿 𝜑, then 𝑃𝐴 ⊬ 𝜎 𝜑 for some arithmetical substitution 𝜎.
Proof If ⊬𝐶𝑃𝐿 𝜑, then ℳ ⊭ 𝜑 for some model ℳ.
Let 𝜎 be the following arithmetical substitution:
𝜎 𝑝 = 0 = 0 if ℳ ⊨ 𝑝0 ≠ 0 if ℳ ⊭ 𝑝
,
then we have ℕ ⊭ 𝜑.
ℳ ⊨ 𝑝1, 𝑝2, 𝑝4
ℳ ⊭ 𝑝3
ℳ
ℕ ⊨ 0 = 0
ℕ ⊭ 0 ≠ 0
ℕ
![Page 11: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
CPL vs PA
Thm2 If ⊬𝐶𝑃𝐿 𝜑, then 𝑃𝐴 ⊬ 𝜎 𝜑 for some arithmetical substitution 𝜎.
Thm2+ There exists an arithmetical substitution 𝜎 s.t. if ⊬𝐶𝑃𝐿 𝜑, then 𝑃𝐴 ⊬ 𝜎 𝜑 .
↑
Lemma [Myhill1972]
There are Σ1-sentences 𝑆1, 𝑆2, … s.t.
if 𝑆𝑖′ ≡ 𝑆𝑖 or ¬𝑆𝑖 then 𝐴𝐴 ∪ {𝑆1
′ , 𝑆2′ , … } has a model.
𝜎 𝑝𝑖 = 𝑆𝑖 :
ℳ ⊨ 𝑝1, 𝑝2, 𝑝4
ℳ ⊭ 𝑝3
ℳ ⊭ 𝜑 𝑝1, 𝑝2, 𝑝3, 𝑝4
𝒩 ⊨ 𝑆1, 𝑆2, 𝑆4
𝒩 ⊭ 𝑆3
Σ1
𝒩 ⊭ 𝜑 𝑆1, 𝑆2, 𝑆3, 𝑆4
![Page 12: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
CPL vs PA
Q If ⊬𝐼𝑃𝐿 𝜑, then does 𝐻𝐴 ⊬ 𝜎 𝜑 hold for some 𝜎 ?
↔ Can we find the following 𝑆1, 𝑆2, … and ℒ ?
Q+ Is there an arithmetical substitution 𝜎 s.t. if ⊬𝐼𝑃𝐿 𝜑, then 𝐻𝐴 ⊬ 𝜎 𝜑 ?
ℳ ⊨ 𝑝2, 𝑝4
ℳ ⊭ 𝑝1, 𝑝3
ℳ1
𝒩 ⊨ 𝑆2, 𝑆4
𝒩 ⊭ 𝑆1, 𝑆3
𝒩1
ℳ ⊨ 𝑝1, 𝑝2, 𝑝4
ℳ ⊭ 𝑝3
ℳ2
𝒩 ⊨ 𝑆1, 𝑆2, 𝑆4
𝒩 ⊭ 𝑆3
𝒩1
𝒦 ⊮ 𝜑 𝑝1, 𝑝2, 𝑝3, 𝑝4 ℒ ⊮ 𝜑 𝑆1, 𝑆2, 𝑆3, 𝑆4
![Page 13: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
IPL vs HA
Q If ⊬𝐼𝑃𝐿 𝜑, then does 𝐻𝐴 ⊬ 𝜎 𝜑 hold for some 𝜎 ?
A Yes! There is a substitution.
(Weak version of de Jongh’s theorem / Arithmetical completeness)
Q+ Is there an arithmetical substitution 𝜎 s.t. if ⊬𝐼𝑃𝐿 𝜑, then 𝐻𝐴 ⊬ 𝜎 𝜑 ?
A Yes! There is a uniform substitution.
(de Jongh’s theorem / Uniform version of arithmetical completeness)
Π2
![Page 14: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Some variants of de Jongh’s theorem
Proof of (weak) de Jongh’s theorem
Strong verision
de Jongh’s theorem for one
propositional variable
![Page 15: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Proof of (weak) de Jongh’s theorem
Thm If ⊬𝐼𝑃𝐿 𝜑, then 𝐻𝐴 ⊬ 𝜎 𝜑 for some arithmetical substitution 𝜎.
Lemma [Jaskowski1936,Smorinski1973]
If ⊬𝐼𝑃𝐿 𝜑, then 𝒦 ⊮ 𝜑 for some 𝒦 based on either of the following tree:
Lemma [Myhill1972]
There are Σ1-sentences 𝑆1, 𝑆2, … s.t.
if 𝑆𝑖′ ≡ 𝑆𝑖 or ¬𝑆𝑖 then 𝐴𝐴 ∪ {𝑆1
′ , 𝑆2′ , … } has a PA model.
…
![Page 16: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Proof of (weak) de Jongh’s theorem
Thm If ⊬𝐼𝑃𝐿 𝜑, then 𝐻𝐴 ⊬ 𝜎 𝜑 for some arithmetical substitution 𝜎.
ℳ0
ℳ12 ℳ11 ℳ13
ℳ21 ℳ22 ℳ23 ℳ24 ℳ25 ℳ26
𝒦 ⊮ 𝜑 𝑝1, 𝑝2
𝑝2
𝑝1
ℕ
ℕ ℕ ℕ
𝒯1 𝒯2 𝒯3 𝒯4 𝒯5 𝒯6
ℒ ⊮ 𝜑 𝐴1, 𝐴2
𝐴1 ≡ ¬𝑆1 ∧ ¬𝑆3 ∧ ¬𝑆4 ∧ ¬𝑆5 ∧ ¬𝑆6
𝐴2 ≡ ¬𝑆1 ∧ ¬𝑆2 ∧ ¬𝑆3 ∧ ¬𝑆4
𝒯𝑖⊨ 𝑆𝑖
but 𝒯𝑖⊭ 𝑆𝑗
![Page 17: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Strong version
Thm If ⊬𝐼𝑃𝐿 𝜑, then 𝐻𝐴 ⊬ 𝜎 𝜑 for some arithmetical substitution 𝜎.
Thm+ If ⊬𝐼𝑃𝐿 𝜑, then 𝐻𝐴 ⊬ 𝜎 𝜑 for some arithmetical Σ1-substitution 𝜎.
Thm++ There exists an arithmetical Π2-substitution 𝜎 s.t. ⊬𝐼𝑃𝐿 𝜑 implies 𝐻𝐴 ⊢ 𝜎 𝜑 .
Thm+++ Let 𝑆1, 𝑆2, … be arbitrary Π2-sentences, independent over 𝑃𝐴 + {true Π1-sentences}, and let 𝜎 𝑝𝑖 = 𝑆𝑖. Then ⊬𝐼𝑃𝐿 𝜑 implies 𝐻𝐴 ⊢ 𝜎 𝜑 .
![Page 18: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
de Jongh’s theorem for one propositional variable
Thm
𝜑 𝑝 : propositional formula consisting of only one propositional variable 𝑝.
𝑆 : arbitrary Σ1-sentence independent over 𝑃𝐴.
⇒ ⊬𝐼𝑃𝐿 𝜑 implies 𝐻𝐴 ⊬ 𝜎 𝑆 .
Lemma [Nishimura1960]
𝜑 𝑝 : propositional formula consisting
of only one propositional variable 𝑝.
⊬𝐼𝑃𝐿 𝜑 𝑝 .
⇒ 𝒩 ⊮ 𝜑 𝑝 𝒩 :
ℳ
ℳ
ℳ
ℳ′
ℳ
ℳ
…
…
ℳ′ ⊨ 𝑝 ℳ ⊭ 𝑝
![Page 19: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
de Jongh’s theorem for one propositional variable
Thm
𝜑 𝑝 : propositional formula consisting of only one propositional variable 𝑝.
𝑆 : arbitrary Σ1-sentence independent over 𝑃𝐴.
⇒ ⊬𝐼𝑃𝐿 𝜑 implies 𝐻𝐴 ⊬ 𝜎 𝑆 .
Proof
ℳ
ℳ
ℳ
ℳ′
ℳ
ℳ
…
…
ℳ′ ⊨ 𝑝 ℳ ⊭ 𝑝
ℕ
ℕ
ℕ
𝒯
ℕ
ℕ
…
…
𝒯 ⊨ 𝑆 ℕ ⊭ 𝑆
![Page 20: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Summary
![Page 21: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Summary
■Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem.
[Smorinsky1973]
■Some variations of arithmetical completeness for logic of proofs.
[Iwata-Kurahashi2017]
■Arithmetical completeness for intuitionistic Logic of Proofs.
[Artemov-Iemhoff2007, Dashkov2009]
■Search for a modal logic which captures the provability predicate in Heyting Arithmetic. [Artemov-Beklemishev2005]
![Page 22: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
References
![Page 23: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
References
[Artemov-Iemhoff2007] ARTEMOV, Sergei; IEMHOFF, Rosalie. The basic intuitionistic logic of proofs. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 2007, 72.2: 439-451.
[Artemov-Beklemishev2005] ARTEMOV, Sergei N.; BEKLEMISHEV, Lev D. Provability logic. In: Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd Edition. Springer Netherlands, 2005. p. 189-360.
[Dashkov2009] DASHKOV, Evgenij. Arithmetical completeness of the intuitionistic logic of proofs. Journal of Logic and Computation, 2009, 21.4: 665-682.
[Jaskowski1936] Jaśkowski, Stanisław. Recherches sur le syst~me de la logique intuitionniste. Actes du congres international de philosophie scientifique, Philosophie des mathematiques, 1936.
[Iwata-Kurahashi2017] SOHEI, Iwata; TAISHI, Kurahashi. Arithmetical completeness theorem for Logic of proofs. Talk in the spring meeting of the Mathematical Society of Japan, 2017.
![Page 24: Some variations of de Jongh’s theorem](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060610/6296ee7380fd286be10bf09a/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
References
[Kripke 1965] KRIPKE, Saul A. Semantical analysis of intuitionistic logic I. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 1965, 40: 92-130.
[Myhill 1972] MYHILL, John. An Absolutely Independent Set of Σ10-
Sentences. Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 1972, 18.7: 107-109.
[Nishimura1960] NISHIMURA, Iwao. On formulas of one variable in intuitionistic propositional calculus. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1960, 25.4: 327-331.
[Smorynski1973] SMORYNSKI, Craig Alan. Applications of Kripke models. In: Metamathematical investigation of intuitionistic arithmetic and analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1973. p. 324-391.