Some Considerations concerning the Physical basis of SST Measurements
description
Transcript of Some Considerations concerning the Physical basis of SST Measurements
Earth Observation Science www.leos.le.ac.uk
Some Considerations concerning the Physical basis of SST MeasurementsDavid Llewellyn-JonesAATSR Principal InvestigatorSpace Research CentreDepartment of Physics & AstronomyUniversity of LeicesterUK
Measuring SST – Mainly from Space • Approaching the basic problems:–Calibration–Atmospheric Correction–Which Wavelengths?–The Pesky Target –
• What are we Measuring?The Skin and Bulk IssueVariability and Sampling
Measuring SST - Buckets – the Parker Collection
Measuring SST –
Why do we use Space?
• Coverage• Continuity• Consistency• All essential requirements for
– Climate– Large-Scale Oceanography; and – Meteorology
Approaching the Basic Problems1. Deploy a reliable, high-performance radiometer in Space
2. Apply an accurate and reliable Atmospheric Correction
3. Appreciate and Allow for the nature of the target Surface
4. Also:-We must have a reliable and
Consistent in situ reference measurement system in Place
What makes a very Good Radiometer?• What are we looking at?
– Good optical design– Minimum stray light– Well-defined Instrument Field-of-view
(IFoV)• How much Radiated Power are we
receiving?– Rigorous Calibration Procedures– Pre-launch and In-flight
• What is the wavelength distribution?– End-to-end calibration - if possible
• Have we got enough sensitivity?
Pre-Launch Calibration IssuesWhat must be Measured?• IFoV for all channels
– Check for stray light• Radiometric sensitivity
– Overall performance in Representative Thermal Environment (dynamic)
• Spectral Responses– End-to-end if you can
Traceable Standards Must be Used throughout (i.e. Use QA4EO Guidelines)
Field of View & Radiometric Response
Notice scan-dependence
Notice non-linearity at all wavelenghts
ATSR-1Measurements by G Mason
In-Flight Calibration• Stable Reference Targets
–At least two of them to deal with detector non-linearity
• Stable thermal environments• Traceable standards
An ATSR on-
board Black Body
Peering into the Void - How
Black is Black?
Optimum Sensitivity is Essential• Detectors need to be at<100˚K• Use a closed-cycle refrigerator• Basedon the Stirling Cycle
The Reverend Dr Robert Stirling
1790-1878
cottish clergyman
Space-qualified Stirling-Cycle Refrigerator(ATSR-1 & -2, 1991Designed by john Delderfield and
colleagues at RAL)
Cooling the Detectors for Optimum Sensitivity
Instrumentation – where are we going?• Are we getting too complex?• And too heavy?• Are we experiencing ‘Requirements
Creep’• Is a gulf opening between
scientists and engineers? This is risky and inappropriate to operational systems
• For future sensors, can engineers concentrate on suitability for repeat manufacture.
Operational and Scientific Users
• Despite What is sometimes said, operational users do need optimised and improved performance from their observing systems
• But they are not always in a good position to explore improvements
• Scientists are keen to do just that• So, ideally, operational systems can
benefit from strong and pro-active scientific user-communities – and it’s not always easy . .
What wavelength Region• Clear-sky accuracy of IR 3.7-11-
12µm combination is undisputed• However, coverage limitations due
to clouds, require inclusion of Microwave radiometers in a truly Global measurement system.
• Data-merging systems make this possible
• R&D on calibration still desirable
Understanding the Target -1 :• The Traditional Skin-Bulk issue:
–Skin is what interfaces with the Atmosphere
–and is the basis to the measureable ToA BT
–Bulk is in the historical recordsBUT -–Experience shows we actually
looking at both
The Pesky Target –
What are we Measuring?
Understanding the Target - 1:• Sampling a 1km Pixel
– For a point measurement skin and bulk temperatures are different for little or no wind
– A Bulk temperature applies for higher wind-speeds
– Often something in between
Understanding the Target - 2:
• We have 2-dimensional non-uniformity at the surface
• Compounded by vertical non-uniformity beneath the surface
• Compounded by the fact that vertical T-profile depends on changing surface wind and changing insolation
• What does this all mean?
Horizontal and Vertical Non-Uniformity• Unless wind is very stable or non-
existent:• Mean temperatures of a 1km x 1km
surface area is a indefinable mixture of skin and sub-surface temperatures
• Limited point sampling (e.g. Radiometerscan be unrepresentative
Could we put a radiometer on that?
Summary Points • For Climate Applications ,
observations must be properly quality-assured (QA4EO) with Reference measurements traceable to accepted standards• For calibration procedures and
equipment, for retrieval methodologies, this can be achieved.
• The next generation of sensors needs careful R&D – Requirements creep must stop!
An ideal Technology Objective for the Future:1) Constellation of 3-6 high-
performance IR SST Radiometers, (Technology challenge)
2) 1 or 2 wide-swath images for lower accuracy broad coverage
3) 1 or 2 MW SST radiometers with good calibration (Technology challenge)
4) Geostationary network for diurnal variability, with higher spatial resolution for coastal processes etc (Technology challenge)
5) in situ network of reference sensors, with traceable calibration
Summary Points - Resolved Conflicts:• In situ obs or Space?
– Actually we need both• Is it Microwave or IR
– Actually we need both• Are we measuring Skin or Bulk T?
– Actually we need both• Should we use Buoys or Radiometers
for in situ obs? – Actually we need both
• Is it the
ATSR V2.0: 18 Year SST Climatology