Solid State Transformer and FREEDM System Power · PDF fileSolid State Transformer and FREEDM...
Transcript of Solid State Transformer and FREEDM System Power · PDF fileSolid State Transformer and FREEDM...
Solid State Transformer and FREEDM System Power Management Strategies
1
Prof. Alex Q. Huang, Progress Energy Distinguished ProfessorNSF FREEDM Systems Center
NC State University
Presentation Outline
1. FREEDM System: A Resilient and Smart Distribution
System
2. Solid State Transformer
• Three Generations of FREEDM Developed SST
Technology
3. Advanced Power Management Functions of the SST
4. FREEDM System Intelligent Power Management (IPM)
Control
5. Towards Energy Internet
Low Voltage Power Delivery System at the Edge of ICT: Power Electronics Impact in the last 50 Years
PowerFactor
Correction
DC/DCConverter
CPUPower
SystemPower
MemoryPower
GraphicsPower
400V (DC)
< Front end AC/DC >
< On board DC/DC >
60-264V (AC)
12V (DC)
(DC)
(DC)
(DC)
(DC)
• Plug-and-play of efficient power • Unprecedented power quality• Isolation of load dynamics by POL• (Point of Load) converters• Necessary for DC loads
3
POLs
Silicon power device’s most important contribution(BV < 600VSi BJT, Si MOSFET to GaN HFET)
BV<30VSi MOSFETGaN HFET
BJT: 1947 1970: SMPS 1980: power MOSFET 2010: GaN HFET
High Voltage and Medium Voltage Power Delivery System: Grid Edge Control Challenge
4[1] Electricity grid simple- North America" by United States Department of Energy, SVG version by User:J Jmesserly -http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/reliability/blackout/ch1-3.pdf Page 13 Title:"Final Report on the August 14, 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada" Dated April 2004. Accessed on 2010-12-25. Licensed under Public domain via Wikimedia Commons http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Electricity_grid_simple-_North_America.svg#mediaviewer/File:Electricity_grid_simple-_North_America.svg
Electricity grid in North America. Source: [1]
Transformer History:invented in 1886 by
William Stanley
Split phase 120/240V
Distribution grid transformer (pole mounted)
• Designed for unidirectional power flow and century-old transformer technology with little controllability beyond substation• Requires a wide spectrum of products for power quality improvement (SVC,
active filter, voltage compensator, DVR, etc.)• Strong coupling and won’t isolate harmonics/other disturbances • Not friendly for integration of renewable energy source (DC-typed sources
need more conversion stages, synchronization), EV, electronic load
William Stanley
Direct medium voltage power conversion
PowerFactor
Correction
DC/DCConverter
Load
Renewable Energy
Generation
Energy Storage
Others
MV DC
< Front end AC/DC >
4160-69 kV (AC)
LV DC
(400V)
Direct medium voltage power conversion [1]•power conversion without 60 Hz transformer •Smart functions for enhanced grid edge control
Inverter
LV AC
5
Solid State Transformer
Addressing climate change grand challenge: higher penetration of distributed generation/storage/renewable hence the need for better control (µs~hour)
[1] Huang, NSF ERC proposal, 2007
FREEDM System Physical Architecture
Bi-directional flow
Solid State Transformer 380 VDC Bus
6
Storage DG
Plug-and-play DC or AC Microgrid (Energy Cell)
Fault Isolation Device
120V/240V AC
StorageDG
DGISoftware
A resilient grid and an ubiquitous IT node are needed for future grid
7
SST for A Complete DC Grid
Plug-and-play DC Microgrid
Storage DG
software
software
In this case SST is absolutely needed since there is no 60Hz DC Transformer
Medium Voltage (MV) SST Technical Approach & Research Areas
8
60Hz Transformer
Gen- 1 SST: Si-based (6.5 kV IGBT 3kHz)
Gen- 2 SST: SiC-based (15 kV SiCMOSFET 10 kHz)
Gen- 3 SST:SiC @ 40 kHz
Wide Bandgap DevicesControls
36"
25
"
17
"
SiC & GaN power devices, other wide bandgap
Topology/magnetics
Vision:(plug-and-play and resilient grid for high DER penetration)
WBG power device packaging
Fuse+Relay
Rectifier
CrpTransformer
MV MOS
LV MOS
Li
MV AC
Input
LV AC
Output
Control
board
Unfolding
Bridge
Lo
MOV
Crs
24"
30
"
10
"
9
SST Grand Challenge: High Input Voltage
• 1968: Si bipolar transistor breakdown voltage is only ~100V• Also the topology is not directly usable due to voltage overshoot etc
????
10
Isolated
ZVS DC/DC
Converter
DC/AC Vg
Distribution grid
LV ac feeder
LVDC Link
capacitor
Medium voltage Low voltage
AC/DC
MVDC Link
capacitor
Medium Frequency Transformer for galvanic isolation
Three Stage Medium Voltage SST
11
SST Grand Challenge: High Input Voltage
+
-
+
-
3.8kV
DC
+
-
+
-
400V
DC
3.8kV
DC
SH5
SH7
SH6
SH8
S1
S3S4
SH1
SH3SH4
SH2 S2
Low Voltage
H-Bridge
+
-
+
-
400V
DC
High Frequency
Transformer
AC/DC Rectifier DC/DC Converter DC/AC Inverter
High Voltage
H-BridgeHigh voltage
H-Bridge
3.8kV
DC
7.2 kV AC
120V /
240V AC
LLs
Cs
CsLs
Port 1
Port 2
400V DC
+
-
Port 3
Gen-I SST 6.5kV Si IGBT based
Input: 7.2kVac Output: 240Vac/120Vac; 400Vdc Power rating: 20kVA
Increasing Voltage
Three stage power conversion
6.5-kV / 25-A Si IGBT
Wang et. al, “Design and hardware implementation of Gen-1 silicon based solid state transformer," APEC 2011
WBG Material Advantages
12
Low on-state losses
0
1
2
3
4
Electric Field
(MV/cm)
Energy Band Gap
(eV)
Thermal
Conductivity
(W/cm-K)
Electron
Saturation
Velocity
(10^7cm/s)
Electron Mobility
(10^3cm^2/s)
Si SiC
High voltage capability
High temperature operation
GaN
SiC Capability
13
Source: Vipin Pala et. al, ECCE2014
Theoretically about 1000X reduction over Si MOSCurrently about 100X reduction achieved for >600V rangeThe improvement is only about 10X over SJ devices!
SJ
10X reduction
GaN
100X reduction
10X increase
25℃���
15kV SiC GTO, n-IGBT and MOSFET
SiC bipolar devices are more suitable for high temperature operation
15
Much lower switching loss compared with 6.5 kV IGBT;
Up to 8 kHz even in hard switching condition.
Turn-on loss can be eliminated in ZVSoperation
15 kV SiC MOSFET Switching Losses
16
Q1
Q2
Vin
A
Idc
V
Rd
Rs
Zi
DUT
Vs
iQ
CdcVdc
+
-
High Voltage
Half-Bridge Output Charge Measurement System
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
Qo
ss / n
C
Vdc / V
Output Charge of 15kV SiC MOSFET & JBS
fs=0.625k
fs=1.25k
(V ) 11.43 V 0.0406 (nC)oss ds dsQ
Output charge model :
∆ Simple configuration
∆ High accuracy (<1% error)
∆ No special equipment needed
∆ High voltage (up to kV)
15 kV SiC MOSFET Output Charge Measurement and Modeling
SiC MOSFETSoft
Switching
With SiC MOSFET: 15 to 300 X improvements
BreakdownVoltage (kV)
12
0.1 1 10 100
Maximum switching frequency (kHz)
4
8
SiC MOSFETHard Switching
Silicon bipolar
5 MHz-V (thermally limited)
16
90 Mhz-V 1.5 GHz-V
Figure of Merit=BV*fsw
Gen-II SST Specifications:• Input: 7.2kVac• Output: 240Vac/120Vac; 400Vdc• Power rating: 20kVA
Tested Condition:• Input: 3.6kVac• Output: 240Vac; 400Vdc• Power rating: 10kVA
18
Three stage power conversion
12 kVdc
Three Stage SST with DAB Isolated DC-DC Converter
19
95.5
96
96.5
97
97.5
98
0 5 10 15
Eff
icie
nc
y
Power(kW)
DAB DC-DC Efficiency10kHz
15kHz
20kHz
93.5%
94.0%
94.5%
95.0%
95.5%
96.0%
96.5%
97.0%
97.5%
98.0%
98.5%
99.0%
99.5%
100.0%
0 10 20 30 40
Eff
icie
nc
y
Power(kW)
AC-DC Rectifier Efficiency
6 kHz
12 kHz
98.0%
98.2%
98.4%
98.6%
98.8%
99.0%
99.2%
99.4%
0 5 10 15
Eff
icie
nc
y
Load(kW)
DC-AC Inverter Efficiency
1.2kV Si IGBT
600V Si IGBT
1.2V SiC MOSFET
Measured Efficiency of Three Stage SST with DAB Isolated DC-DC Converter
20
P2
P1
Cmv2
S1
S2
R1
R4
R3
R2
Ls
ir
vMV
Lg
Clv
Cmv1
AC-DC Rectifier Series Resonant DC-DC Converter
Medium Voltage Low Voltage
n:1 Crs2
Crs1
Lm
R5
R8
R7
R6
imvLV
DC-AC Inverter
Gen-II SST Specifications:• Input: 7.2kVac• Output: 240Vac/120Vac; 400Vdc• Power rating: 20kVA
Tested Condition:• Input: 3.6kVac• Output: 240Vac; 400Vdc• Power rating: 10kVA
Three stage power conversion
15KV/10A SiC MOSFET 1.2KV/100A SiC MOSFET
Improved Three Stage SST with SRC Isolated DC-DC Converter
21
96.0%
96.2%
96.4%
96.6%
96.8%
97.0%
97.2%
97.4%
97.6%
97.8%
98.0%
98.2%
98.4%
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Eff
icie
nc
y
Power(kW)
DC-DC Stage Efficiency
10 kHz DAB
40 kHz Series Resonant Converter
Medium Voltage Isolated DAB vs SRC
• Soft Switching Over Full Load range• Improved medium frequency transformer design
22
Isolated
ZVS AC/AC
Converter
Vg
Distribution grid
LV ac feeder
Medium voltage Low voltage
Medium Frequency Transformer for galvanic isolation
Single Stage Medium Voltage SST
23
P2
P1
Crp2
S1
S2
R1
R4
R3
R2
Ls
ir
vMV
Lg
Co
vin
vin
Crp1
Unfolding Bridge Series Resonant Converter
Medium Voltage Low Voltage
n:1 Crs2
Crs1
Lm
Lo
R5
R8
R7
R6
imvLV
Unfolding Bridge
vo
vo
Gen-III SST Specifications:• Input: 7.2kVac• Output: 280Vac• Power rating: 20kVA
Tested Conditions:• Input: 3.6kVac• Output: 280Vac• Power rating: 10kVA
Single stage power conversion
15KV/10A SiC MOSFET 1.2KV/100A SiC MOSFET
Single Stage Medium Voltage SST
Gen-III SST Major Achievement:Vin=4.2 kV AC, Po = 8kW
24
4.2kV AC – 280V AC Experimental Waveforms @ 8kW
Crp1
Q1
Q2
Lm
Q3
n:1
Q4
Ls
Crp2
Crs1
Crs2
Lo
Co
+
-
+
-Vds2
Vin
Vo
ir
+
-
Gen-III SST Prototype(24inch*30inch*10inch)
Fuse+Relay
Rectifier
CrpTransformer
MV MOS
LV MOS
Li
MV AC
Input
LV AC
Output
Control
board
Unfolding
Bridge
Lo
MOV
Crs
24"
30
"
10
"
Three Generations of SSTs
25
60Hz Transformer
Gen- 1 SST: 6.5 kV IGBT @ 3 kHz
Gen- 2 SST: 15 kV SiC@ 6 kHz & 40 kHz
Gen- 3 SST:15 kV SiC@37 kHz
36"
25
"
17
"
Fuse+Relay
Rectifier
CrpTransformer
MV MOS
LV MOS
Li
MV AC
Input
LV AC
Output
Control
board
Unfolding
Bridge
Lo
MOV
Crs
24"
30
"
10
"
• Gen-1 and Gen-2 features three stage solutions, and have all the desired smart functions• Gen-3 is a single stage solution, the focus is on cost and efficiency
Transformation of the distribution power grid with smart Solid State Transformers
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
Eff
icie
ncy /
%
Load / W
Efficiency vs Load
Three Generations of SST Measured Efficiency (MV AC- LV AC)
26
Gen II with DAB
Gen III
• Much higher efficiency through single stage, improved magnetics and soft switching• 2% improvement compared to Gen-II SST, 7% over Gen-I• Reached >97% for the MV AC-AC SST
Gen-I: <90%
Gen II with SRC
Vin=3.6 kVac,rms
Three Generations of SST Power Density Vs Efficiency
27
80.0%
82.0%
84.0%
86.0%
88.0%
90.0%
92.0%
94.0%
96.0%
98.0%
0.25 0.45 0.65 0.85 1.05 1.25
Eff
icie
ncy
Powerdensity (W/in3)
Power Density Vs Efficiency
36"
25
"
17
"
Fuse+Relay
Rectifier
CrpTransformer
MV MOS
LV MOS
Li
MV AC
Input
LV AC
Output
Control
board
Unfolding
Bridge
Lo
MOV
Crs
24"
30
"
10
"
28
SST Winning Strategy for Smart Grid
•Fault management•Current limiting•Disconnect/reconnect
•Power Management:1. Control power factor/Var Injection2. Change/Control customer voltage 3. Low voltage ride through4. Eliminate customer side harmonics5. Provide DC power/Forming DC
Microgrid6. Bidirectional Power flow control via
Energy Cell aggregation7. Supports advanced power
managements and islanding modes
•Energy Management•Monitor energy usage (AMI)•Can control/dispatch power via microgrids (Energy Cell)•Demand side management
Microsecond
Hours
SST
Utility Distribution Feeder
LV DC 380V
LVAC 120/240VOr 3phase 480V
Software Communication(IEC61850, DNP3,Modbus)
contr
ol
29
Isolated
ZVS DC/DC
Converter
DC/AC Vg
Distribution grid
LV ac feeder
LVDC Link
capacitor
Medium voltage Low voltage
AC/DC
MVDC Link
capacitor
Three Stage Medium Voltage SST: Supports Many Power Management Smart Features
2: Load regulation
5. Forming DC Microgrid6. Power flow control3. Temporary energy
For LVRT
4. Absorb any AC side harmonic currents
1. Independent Q junction
7. Disconnect from grid to form islanding operations
30
Reactive power compensation: 3.6KV-120V,
5KW, 2KVar (Gen-I SST Result)
Inductive mode operation
Capacitive mode operation
Load PF=1
Load PF=1
1.
Grid Voltage Support Via Q injection
1: SST rectifier in diode mode (1.8kV distribution grid voltage )
– 2: SST starts with 1kW load
– 3: Grid voltage drops 10%
– 4: SST generates reactive power to restore Vpcc 31
1.
32
Load regulation: : 3.6KV-120V, 5KW-3KW (Gen-I)
Output DC voltage, AC voltage and current
2.
Load step down
AC Voltage
DC Voltage
33
Smart Feature: Low Voltage Ride Through (LVRT)
Input voltage, current, PWM voltage, high voltage DC link 3Output DC voltage, AC voltage and current
Gen-I SST
120V AC
3.6 kV AC
5 kW LOAD
3.
Smart Feature: Load Harmonic Mitigation
34
Grid voltage
Grid current
LV ac voltage
LV ac current
Test setup and condition
Grid voltage: 1.8kV
HV dc link voltage: 3kV
Low voltage dc output: 200V
Low voltage ac output 120V
APF
4.
Grid-Connected Operation:3.6kV steady state/DC Microgrid
• Grid voltage: 3.6kV
• MVDC link voltage: 6kV
• Low voltage dc output: regulated at 400V
35
3.6kV grid voltage
Grid current
High voltage dc link (half)
400V low voltage dc output
5.
PF=1
Grid-Connected Operation:Regenerative mode/bidirectional power flow
• Grid voltage: 900V
• MVDC link voltage: 1.5kV
• Low voltage dc: 100V
36
Filter REC DC/DC INVLV AC
MV AC
SST
LV DC DCcurrentsource
Load
LV dc current (from positive to negative)
LV dc voltage
MV grid voltage MV grid current
6.
37
Soft Start
SST Power Flow Control: Control DC Bus Voltage As a Aggregation Signal
Energy cell
SST“Energy Router”
6.
SST and DC Microgrid Testbed
38
Gen-I SST
switch
Load bank
120 W PV panel20Ah battery
500 w DC/DC Converter for battery
200 w DC/DC converter for PV
Key hardware parameters
FREEDM Control Classification
SST1
SST2 SST3
69 KV 12.45 KV
FID 1 FID 2
120 V AC
380 V DC
Residential
AC system
Residential
DC systemDC microgrid
AC microgrid380 V DC
Residential
DC systemDC microgrid
120 V ACResidential
AC system
AC microgrid
Communication line
Power line
Control center
Grid
FID 3
Key features of the innovative FREEDM system:
1. Plug-and-play AC and DC Microgrid that integrate distributed renewable
energy resources (DRER) and distributed energy storage devices (DESD).
2. Intelligent power management (IPM) through high bandwidth SST.
3. Intelligent fault management (IFM) with ultra-fast and intelligent FID.
4. Intelligent energy management (IEM) via coordinated optimization and
dispatch of distributed resources. Slower communication can be used
Intelligent Power Management (IPM) Control of FREEDM System
Operation modes and transitions
IPM Challenge: operate each component/subsystem in a distributed fashion
while maintaining system stability under all operation conditions
Mode I:
FREEDM system
in grid-connected
Mode II:
FREEDM system
in islanding
Mode III:
SST in
islanding
Case 1: Substation
SST detects grid faults and
disconnects
Case 3: MVAC bus
under frequency
Case 4:Substation SST synchronizes MVAC bus to
grid and connects
Case 5:Substation SST restores MVAC bus and SSTs
reconnects
Case 2
IPM Objective:
Voltage & Frequency Regulation
Autonomous and Distributed IPM Control Strategy
• IPM control has higher priority than IEM
• Encompasses L1 to L3 level of control
• L1 (energy cell) devices have it own control
• L2 (SST) has its own control
• Require no communication
• Benefit from the inherent control bandwidth of the underlining power electronics
L1
L2
L3
Dual Droop Control Strategy for DC Microgrid
Dual droop control:
First droop for SST: f-P droop (AC frequency to SST active power) and P-
Vldc droop (active power to DC voltage) combine to form the first droop: f-
Vldc (AC side frequency to DC side voltage); SST acts like a real
transformer, only lets power flow through it.
Second droop for DC microgrid:
DESD: Vldc-P droop; affording/absorbing power to/from SST according
to the Vldc (upper level AC frequency f indeed);
DRER: normally MPPT control; Vldc-P droop when Vldc is too high;
Load: shedding at low Vldc point;
DESD, DRER are the only energy sources in system; the working point is
determined by loads and available sources.
Simulated FREEDM System
Battery1
Substation
SST
Battery2 Load1
380VDC
GRID
DC Microgrid DC Microgrid
12.47kV MVAC bus
SST2SST1
PV1 PV2
380VDC
Battery3 Battery4 Load2
VMV, fMV
Vldc1 Vldc2
Component Rated Power Component Rated Power
Substation SST 6000VA Battery1, Battery3 600W
SST1 1200VA Battery2, Battery4 400W
SST2 1000VA Load1 120ΩPV1, PV2 600W Load2 240Ω
DC Microgrid 1 DC Microgrid 1
L1
L2
L3
Simulation Case 1: Mode I to II
AC frequency and active
power of SST1, SST2
Vldc1 and power of PV1,
battery1, battery2
Vldc2 and power of PV2,
battery3, battery4
• 1.7 kW grid power is lost at 2.5s• Battery automatically change from charging to discharging following the
double droop strategy• Battery power sharing automatically achieved • Power balance is reached within 0.1s
Simulation Case 4: Mode II to I
AC frequency and active
power of SST1, SST2
Vldc1 and power of PV1,
battery1, battery2
Vldc2 and power of PV2,
battery3, battery4
• When MV grid recovers, dual droop re-balance the power flow . Battery in charging mode
Simulation Case 3: Mode II to III
AC frequency and active
power of SST1, SST2
Vldc1 and power of PV1,
battery1, battery2
Vldc2 and power of PV2,
battery3, battery4
• DC microgrid 1 battery and PV production stops• Available power not capable to regulate medium voltage frequency. SST1 and
SST2 disconnect from medium voltage feeder • DC microgrid 2 is capable to keep DC microgrid 2 operation
DC Microgrid 1 DC Microgrid 2
Simulation Case 5: Mode III to I
AC frequency and active
power of SST1, SST2
Vldc1 and power of PV1,
battery1, battery2
Vldc2 and power of PV2,
battery3, battery4
• When MV grid recovers, SST reconnect to the MV feeder• dual droop re-balance the power flow . • DC microgrid 1 restarts, battery in charging mode• DC microgrid 2 battery moves into charging mode
48
SST Winning Strategy for Smart Grid
•Fault management•Current limiting•Disconnect/reconnect
•Power Management:1. Control power factor/Var Injection2. Change/Control customer voltage 3. Low voltage ride through4. Eliminate customer side harmonics5. Provide DC power/Forming DC
Microgrid6. Bidirectional Power flow control via
Energy Cell aggregation7. Supports advanced power
managements and islanding modes
•Energy Management•Monitor energy usage (AMI)•Can control/dispatch power via microgrids (Energy Cell)•Demand side management
Microsecond
Hours
SST
Utility Distribution Feeder
LV DC 380V
LVAC 120/240VOr 3phase 480V
Software Communication(IEC61850, DNP3,Modbus)
contr
ol
Electric Market Reality & Transformation
49
Where is the customer: You?USA Residential Customer: 128m $114/Per Month/Per Customer ~15B/per monthSource: EIA
Issue: Top-down business architecture
SSTStep 1:
Towards a resilient grid
SSCB
SST
Energy Cells are to
operate and manage local generators,energy storage, and dispatchable load
compete with each other to maximizetheir own profits
Utilities are expected to make more profiton providing ancillary services to ensurethe residential distribution systemsecurity and reliability, in addition toelectricity transaction.
Who owns data rules
Step 2: Towards Energy Internet
[1] Huang, A.Q.; Crow, M.L.; Heydt, G.T.; Zheng, J.P.; Dale, S.J.; , "The Future Renewable Electric Energy Delivery and Management (FREEDM) System: The Energy Internet," Proceedings of the IEEE , vol.99, no.1, pp.133-148, Jan. 2011
[2] W. Su, and A.Q. Huang, “A Game Theoretic Framework for a Next-generation Retail Electricity Market with High Penetration of Distributed Residential Electricity Suppliers” Applied Energy, vol.119, pp.341-350, April 2014.
[3] W. Su, “The Role of Customers in the U.S. Electricity Market: Past, Present, and Future”, The Electricity Journal, 2014. (invited)
Analogous to internet consumer-to-consumer commerce (eBay) or stock market
The Third Industrial Revolution
using Internet technology to transform the power grid of every
continent into an Energy Internet that acts just like the Internet
(when millions of buildings are generating a small amount of renewable energy locally, on-site, they can sell surplus green electricity back to the grid and share it with their continental neighbors); and
Picture from ”Economist”51
THANK YOU
52