Solar Sector Structure Correlations with SuperDARN Radar...

22
Solar Sector Structure Correlations with SuperDARN Radar and EISCAT Svalbard Radar Data Devin Huyghebaert and Kathryn McWilliams Department of Physics and Engineering Physics University of Saskatchewan June 1, 2011

Transcript of Solar Sector Structure Correlations with SuperDARN Radar...

  • Solar Sector Structure Correlations with SuperDARN Radar and EISCAT Svalbard Radar Data

    Devin Huyghebaert and Kathryn McWilliamsDepartment of Physics and Engineering Physics

    University of SaskatchewanJune 1, 2011

  • Outline

    - Introduction - Solar sector structure - Quick overview of previous studies

    - SuperDARN Results

    - ISR Results

    - Future Work

  • Introduction

    (Akasofu, 1981)

    - Solar current sheet

    - Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) directed one direction above current sheet, and opposite direction below current sheet.

    - Earth finds itself above and below current sheet during orbit (Wilcox & Ness, 1967)

    “away”

    “away”“toward”

    “toward”

  • Introduction

    (Fairfield & Scudder, 1985)

    - “towards” solar sectors connect southern polar cap upstream

    - “away” solar sectors connect northern polar cap upstream

  • Introduction

    - Summary of away/toward solar sectors for 10 years, 1998-2007

    - Almost full solar cycle worth of data

  • Connections to Tropospheric Weather?

    (Tinsley, 2000)

    - Vorticity Area Index (VAI) - measure of low pressure troughs in Northern Hemisphere at latitudes >20°

    - Past studies have shown correlations between solar sector boundary crossings and VAI

    - Is there a link?

  • Past Study – Ionospheric Backscatter

    day of month

  • Past Study – Ionospheric Backscatter

    day of month

  • Results – Saskatoon SuperDARN Groundscatter 2003

    -Groundscatter vs. ionospheric backscatter

    - More groundscatter in “towards” sectors

    - Occurs Distinctly in second half of 2003

    - Same trend in ionospheric backscatter

    Year

    Hou

    rly G

    roun

    dsca

    tter

    Cou

    nt

    t t t

    a a a

    (Gilles, 2006)

  • Results

    t ttta aaat

  • Results – Saskatoon SuperDARN Groundscatter 2004

    - 2004, solar sector structure no longer well defined

    - difficult to find any correlation during this period

    Year

    Hou

    rly G

    roun

    dsca

    tter

    Cou

    nt

  • Results – SuperDARN Groundscatter 2003

    90%

    90%

    70%

    70%

    50%50%

    30%

    30%

    10% 10%

    at ta

  • Results – SuperDARN Groundscatter 2004

    90%90%

    70%70%

    50% 50%

    30% 30%

    10% 10%

    t ta a

  • Results – SuperDARN Ionospheric Scatter 2003

    90%

    90%

    70%

    70%

    50%

    50%

    30%

    30%

    10% 10%

    t ta a

  • Results – Southern SuperDARN Groundscatter 2003

    90%

    70%50%

    30%10%

    t a

    90%

    70%50%

    30%

    10%

    ta

  • Results – Solar Wind Data

    - ACE Data

    - 2003 shows an increase in solar wind velocity, and a decrease in solar wind density

    SW Velocity

    SW Density

  • Results – Incoherent Scatter Radar

    - EISCAT Svalbard Radar (ESR) 42m field-aligned dish

    - Opposite Correlations in E- and F- regions

    - 27 day repetition of trend

    2007 day 60-310

    Electron Density

    Lag Days

    Hei

    ght (

    km)

  • Conclusions

    - SuperDARN Groundscatter/Ionospheric Backscatter

    - count increase in “towards” (southern polar cap connected)

    - count decrease in “away” (northern polar cap connected)

    - caused by propagation effects

    - occurs in 2003, not evident in other years

    - only evident in Northern Hemisphere

    - often a peak within a day of the boundary crossing

    - ISR Electron Density

    - E- and F- region 27 day synodic solar rotation evident

  • Future Work

    - Further analyze ISR data

    - 2003, solar sector structure was well defined

    - 2007, what is happening in the E- and F-regions?

    - Analyze other ISR high-latitude locations (Svalbard,

    Poker Flat, RISR-N, etc.)

    - Link to NO density/D-region ionization?

    - DMSP

  • References

    Akasofu, S. -I., Energy coupling between the solar wind and the magnetosphere, Space Science Reviews, 28(2), pp. 121-190, 1981.

    Fairfield, D. H., and Scudder, J. D., Polar rain: Solar coronal electrons in the Earth's magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 90, pp. 4055, 1985.

    Larsen, M.F., & M.C. Kelley, A study of an observed and forecasted meteorological index and its relation to the interplanetary magnetic field, Geophys. Res. Lett., 4:8, pp. 337-340, 1977.

    Tinsley, B.A., Influence of solar wind on the global electric circuit, and inferred effects on cloud microphysics, temperature, and dynamics in the troposphere, Space Science Reviews, 94:1-2, pp.

    231-258, 2000.

    Tinsley, B. A., and R. A. Heelis, Correlations of atmospheric dynamics with solar activity evidence for a connection via the solar wind, atmospheric electricity, and cloud microphysics, J. Geophys.

    Res., 98(D6), pp. 10,375–10,384, 1993.

    Wilcox, J.M., Tropospheric circulation and interplanetary magnetic sector boundaries followed by MeV proton streams, Nature, 278, pp. 840-841, 1979.

    Wilcox, J.M., and N.F. Ness, Solar source of the interplanetary sector structure, Solar Physics, 1:3-4, pp. 437-P445, 1967.

  • Results

    - Attempted finding F- and E- region heights from groundscatter

    - Problem with elevation angle

  • Results

    - E- and F- regions have the same sign correlation

    - 27 day repetition of trend

    2007 day 60-310

    Ion Temperature

    Slide 1Slide 2Slide 3Slide 4Slide 5Slide 6Slide 7Slide 8Slide 9Slide 10Slide 11Slide 12Slide 13Slide 14Slide 15Slide 16Slide 17Slide 18Slide 19Slide 20Slide 21Slide 22