Solar Bankability Webinar Financial Modelling of Technical Risks in PV Projects · 2018-01-18 ·...
Transcript of Solar Bankability Webinar Financial Modelling of Technical Risks in PV Projects · 2018-01-18 ·...
Funded by the Horizon 2020
Framework Programme of the
European Union
Solar Bankability WebinarNovember 22, 2016
Financial Modelling of Technical Risks in PV Projects
Matthias v. Armansperg, ACCELIOS Solar
Risk Modelling Software
22
Modelling software
Yield
Aux-Excel
Financing
Aux-Excel
Dashboard
Excel
Risk modelling
Visual Basic
Cashflow
Excel
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
Risk Modelling Software
33
Input parameters Modelling software
Yield
Aux-Excel
Financing
Aux-Excel
Dashboard
Excel
Risk modelling
Visual Basic
Techn. risk
database
BM1
BM2
BM3
BM4
Repair & maint.
cost factors
BM1
BM2
BM3
BM4
Business Model
techn./finance
BM1
BM2
BM3
BM4
Cashflow
Excel
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
Risk Modelling Software
44
Input parameters Modelling software Output parameters
Yield
Aux-Excel
Financing
Aux-Excel
Dashboard
Excel
Risk modelling
Visual Basic
Single risk
impact
BM1
BM2
BM3
BM4
Techn. risk
database
BM1
BM2
BM3
BM4
Repair & maint.
cost factors
BM1
BM2
BM3
BM4
Business Model
techn./finance
BM1
BM2
BM3
BM4
Risc scenario
impact
BM1
BM2
BM3
BM4
Cashflow
Excel
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
Business Model Selection
5• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
Financial Performance of Business Models
6
IRR (Base case)
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
Financial Performance of Business Models
7
IRR (Base case) Cumulative cash flow (Base case)
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
8
Selection of Technical Risks
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
9
Selection of Technical Risks
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
Failure Cost Calculation
10
Fixing costs due to repair/substitution (Euros)
- Cost of detection (visual inspection, monitoring system, IR for hotspots, EL for crack cells, etc)
- Cost of transportation
- Cost of labour
- Cost of repair/substitution of compontents
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
Failure Cost Calculation
11
Fixing costs due to repair/substitution (Euros)
- Cost of detection (visual inspection, monitoring system, IR for hotspots, EL for crack cells, etc)
- Cost of transportation
- Cost of labour
- Cost of repair/substitution of compontents
Downtime costs due to downtime and/or power loss (kWh to Euros)
- Failures might cause partial or complete power loss
- Downtime duration from occurence of failure till completion of repair/substitution
- Failures at component level might affect other components (e.g. module failure might bring
down the whole string)
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
Failure Categories
12
The impact of risks is measured by failure categories based on a 12 month
revenue reserve account
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
Failure Category Overview
13
Business Model 1 Business Model 2
Business Model 3 Business Model 4
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
Failure Impact – Business Model 3 (Example)
14
Failure impact on
base case
IRR of 5,52%
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
Failure Impact – Business Model 3 (Example)
15
Failure impact on
base case
IRR of 5,52%
Distribution of
failure costs
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
Risk Scenario – Business Model 3 (Example)
16
Risk Risk number Risk name Start Date Case Phase
Risk 1 3020 Hotspot of modules 01.01.2012 Best Infant
Risk 22) 3101 Flooding of inverter 01.08.2017 Worst Mid-life
Risk 31) 3051 Lightning strike of inverter 01.06.2020 Worst Mid-life
Risk 4 3011 Failure of bypass diode and juction box 01.10.2026 Worst Wear-out
Comments
1) External cause independent from project phase
2) Business model specific risk, i.e. due to system design/technology, geographic/climatic conditions
Risk scenario - businss model 3
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
Risk Scenario – Business Model 3 (Example)
17
Risk Risk number Risk name Start Date Case Phase
Risk 1 3020 Hotspot of modules 01.01.2012 Best Infant
Risk 22) 3101 Flooding of inverter 01.08.2017 Worst Mid-life
Risk 31) 3051 Lightning strike of inverter 01.06.2020 Worst Mid-life
Risk 4 3011 Failure of bypass diode and juction box 01.10.2026 Worst Wear-out
Comments
1) External cause independent from project phase
2) Business model specific risk, i.e. due to system design/technology, geographic/climatic conditions
Risk scenario - businss model 3
-10.000.000 EUR
-8.000.000 EUR
-6.000.000 EUR
-4.000.000 EUR
-2.000.000 EUR
0 EUR
2.000.000 EUR
4.000.000 EUR
6.000.000 EUR
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027202820292030
Base case Risk scenario
Cumulative cash flow
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
Risk Mitigation Measures
18
Gu
ara
nte
eL
eve
l 1
Gu
ara
nte
eL
eve
l 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Year
Infant Phase Wear-out Phase
Wa
rra
nty
Mid-life Phase
Co
mm
issio
nin
g
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
Risk Mitigation Measures
19
Gu
ara
nte
eL
eve
l 1
Gu
ara
nte
eL
eve
l 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Year
Infant Phase Wear-out Phase
Wa
rra
nty
Mid-life Phase
Co
mm
issio
nin
g
Commissioning
check
End of
warranty check
Mid-life
advanced
inspection
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
Solar Bankability and Risk Management
20
New capital market regulations like Basel III or Solvency II require
thorough due diligence and risk management procedures
• Solar Bankability Webinar 11/22/2016
Project Reports: www.solarbankability.eu
11/22/2016• Solar Bankability Webinar 21
Final Public Workshop 7th-8th February 2017
Brussels, Belgium
Enhancement of PV Investment Attractiveness
Concept:
Target groups: Finance sector, insurance, EPCs, service providers, decision
makers / broader attendance
1.5-day-Workshop including networking dinner
Fully paid workshop for max. 120 participants
Registration available: End of Oct 2016
Save the date: 7-8 Feb 2017!
11/22/2016 22• Solar Bankability Webinar
Funded by the Horizon 2020
Framework Programme of the
European Union
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 649997.
The content of this report reflects only the author’s view and the Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains
Thank you!
Matthias v. Armansperg, ACCELIOS Solar