SOIL HEALTH - Rajarata University of Sri Lanka · 2019. 6. 29. · Soil health is defined as the...
Transcript of SOIL HEALTH - Rajarata University of Sri Lanka · 2019. 6. 29. · Soil health is defined as the...
SOIL HEALTH
i
Table of Contents
01. Soil ................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1. Components of Soil .............................................................................................................. 1
1.2. Soil Profile ................................................................................................................................ 2
1.3. Soil Formation........................................................................................................................ 4
02. Soil Health .................................................................................................................................... 7
03. Factors Controlling Soil Health .......................................................................................... 9
3.1. Soil Type ....................................................................................................................................... 9
3 .2. Organisms and Functions .................................................................................................... 9
3.3. Carbon and Energy ............................................................................................................... 10
3.4. Nutrients ................................................................................................................................... 11
04. Ideal Soil Structure ............................................................................................................... 12
05. Soil Health and Crop Production .................................................................................... 14
06. Reasons for Reduction of Soil Health ........................................................................... 19
6.1. Aggressive Tillage...................................................................................................................... 19
6.2. Annual/Seasonal Fallow .................................................................................................... 20
6.3. Monocropping ......................................................................................................................... 21
6.4. Annual Crops ........................................................................................................................... 21
6.5. Excessive Inorganic Fertilizer Use ................................................................................. 22
6.6. Excessive Crop Residue Removal ................................................................................... 22
6.7. Broad Spectrum fumigant (Pesticides) ....................................................................... 23
6.8. Broad Spectrum Herbicides .............................................................................................. 23
07. Soil Health Management ..................................................................................................... 25
7.1. Conservation Agriculture and Managing Soil Health ............................................ 25
7.2. Practices for Improve Soil Health .................................................................................. 27
7.2.1. No – Till or Conservation Tillage ............................................................................ 27
7.2.1.1. Features of no till or minimum tillage system……………………………29
7.2.2. Mulching and Cover Cropping ................................................................................. 31
ii
7.2.2.1. Benefits of Mulching/Cover cropping………………………………………..33
7.2.3. Crop Diversification /Crop Rotation ..................................................................... 35
7.2.3.1. Benefits of crop rotations………………………………………………………….36
7.2.4. Use of Organic Fertilizer ............................................................................................. 37
7.2.5 Integrated Pest Management (IPM) ....................................................................... 38
7.2.5.1. The IPM process……………………………………………………………………….38
7.2.5.2. Pest Control Methods……………………………………………………………….39
7.2.5.3. benefits of IPM………………………………………………………………………...40
7.2.6. Integrated Weed Management (IWM) ................................................................. 41
7.2.6.1. Benefits of IWM………………………………………………………..………………42
08. Future Challenges and Opportunities Soil Health Management ...................... 43
09. Bibliography............................................................................................................................. 45
iii
List of Figures
Figure 1 : Soil Profile ........................................................................................................................... 2
Figure 2: Soil Formation Process ................................................................................................... 4
Figure 3: Functions of Soil: (Source: Brady and Weil, 1996) ............................................ 8
Figure 4:The Importance of Soil Biology for Soil Health .................................................. 10
Figure 5: Ideal Composition of a Soil ......................................................................................... 12
Figure 6: Number of Soil Organism in Health Soil ............................................................... 13
Figure 7: Soil Health Indicators and System .......................................................................... 16
Figure 8: Difference in Water Infiltration in Conventional and No-tillage Practices
.................................................................................................................................................................... 18
Figure 9: How to Reduce Soil Health ......................................................................................... 19
Figure 10: Soil Health Principles ................................................................................................. 25
Figure 11: How to Promote Soil Health ................................................................................... 27
Figure 12: Strip Tilling is One Method to Prevent Loss in Soil Quality due to
Excessive Tilling ................................................................................................................................. 28
Figure 13: Intensive Tillage vs Long Term No-Till.............................................................. 30
Figure 14: Crop Rotation ................................................................................................................ 36
Figure 15: IPM Process .................................................................................................................... 38
Figure 16: Pest Control Methods................................................................................................. 39
1
01. Soil
Soils are complex mixtures of minerals, water, air, organic matter, and countless
organisms that are the decaying remains of once-living things. It forms at the
surface of land – it is the “skin of the earth.” Soil is capable of supporting plant life
and is vital to life on earth.
The traditional definition of soil is: dynamic natural body having properties
derived from the combined effects of climate and biotic activities, as modified by
topography, acting on parent materials over time.
1.1. Components of Soil
There are five basic components of soil that, when present in the proper amounts
are the backbone of all terrestrial plant ecosystems.
• Minerals: The larger component of soil is the mineral portion, which
makes up approximately 45% to 49% of the volume.
• Water: is the second basic component of the soil. Water can make up
approximately 2% to 50% of the soil volume. Water is important for
transporting nutrients to growing plants and soil organisms and for
facilitating both biological and chemical decomposition.
• Organic matter: is found in soils at levels of approximately 1% to 5%.
Organic matter is derived from dead plants and animals and such as has a
high capacity to hold on to and/or provide the essential elements and
water for plant growth.
2
• Gases: Air can occupy the same spaces as water. It can make up
approximately 2% to 50% of the soil volume
• Micro-organisms: They are found in the soil in very high numbers but
make up much less than 1% of the soil volume. The largest of these
organisms are earthworms and nematodes and smallest are bacteria,
actinomycetes, algae, and fungi.
1.2. Soil Profile
The soil profile is defined as a vertical section of the soil that is exposed by a soil
pit. A soil pit is a hole that is dug from the surface of the soil to the underlying
bedrock. Soil profile has five main horizons (Figure 1).
Figure 1 : Soil Profile
3
• Organic Surface Layer (O): - Litter layer of plant residues, the upper part
often relatively un-decomposed, but the lower part may be strongly
humified.
• Surface Soil (A):- Layer of mineral soil with most organic matter
accumulation and soil life. Additionally, due to weathering, oxides (mainly
iron oxides) and clay minerals are formed and accumulated. It has a
pronounced soil structure. But in some soils, clay minerals, iron, aluminum,
organic compounds, and other constituents are soluble and move
downwards. When this eluviation is pronounced, a lighter colored E
subsurface soil horizon is apparent at the base of the A horizon. A horizons
may also be the result of a combination of soil bioturbation and surface
processes that winnow fine particles from biologically mounded topsoil. In
this case, the A horizon is regarded as a "biomantle".
• Sub Soil (B): - This layer has normally less organic matter than the A
horizon, so its colour is mainly derived from iron oxides. Iron oxides and
clay minerals accumulate as a result of weathering. In a soil, where
substances move down from the topsoil, this is the layer, where they
accumulate. The process of accumulation of clay minerals, iron, aluminum
and organic compounds, is referred to as illuviation. The B horizon has
generally a soil structure.
• Substratum (C): - Layer of non-indurated poorly weathered or un-
weathered rocks. This layer may accumulate the more soluble compounds
like CaCO3. Soils formed in situ from non-indurated material exhibit
similarities to this C layer.
• Bedrock (R): - R horizons denote the layer of partially weathered or un-
weathered bedrock at the base of the soil profile. Unlike the above layers, R
4
horizons largely comprise continuous masses (as opposed to boulders) of
hard rock that cannot be excavated by hand. Soils formed in situ from
bedrock will exhibit strong similarities to this bedrock layer.
1.3. Soil Formation
Figure 2: Soil Formation Process
Soil
forming
factors
Disintegration
(Physical
breakdown)
Rock and
Minerals
Partially
decompose
d parent
material
Soil
Decomposition
(Chemical
changers)
Soil
forming
processes
5
• The process of soil formation is termed ‘pedogenesis’ (Figure 2). Soils
develop from parent material by various weathering processes. Organic
matter accumulation, decomposition, and humification are as critically
important to soil formation as weathering. The zone of humification and
weathering is termed the solum. Soil acidification resulting from soil
respiration supports chemical weathering. Plants contribute to chemical
weathering through root exudates. Soils can be enriched by deposition of
sediments on floodplains and alluvial fans, and by wind-borne deposits.
• Soil mixing (pedoturbation) is often an important factor in soil formation.
Pedoturbation includes churning clays, cryoturbation, and bioturbation.
Types of bioturbation include faunal pedoturbation (animal burrowing),
floral pedoturbation (root growth, tree-uprooting), and fungal
pedoturbation (mycelia growth). Pedoturbation transforms soils through
destratification, mixing, and sorting, as well as creating preferential flow
paths for soil gas and infiltrating water. The zone of active bioturbation is
termed the soil biomantle.
• Soil moisture content and water flow through the soil profile support
leaching of soluble constituents, and eluviation. Eluviation is the
translocation of colloid material, such as organic matter, clay and other
mineral compounds. Transported constituents are deposited due to
differences in soil moisture and soil chemistry, especially soil pH and redox
potential. The interplay of removal and deposition results in contrasting soil
horizons.
• These processes can be very slow, taking many tens of thousands of years.
• Five main interacting factors affecting the formation of soil:
▪ Parent material—minerals forming the basis of soil
▪ Living organisms—influencing soil formation
6
▪ Climate—affecting the rate of weathering and organic
decomposition
▪ Topography—grade of slope affecting drainage, erosion and
deposition
▪ Time—influencing soil properties.
• Interactions between these factors produce an infinite variety of soils
across the earth’s surface.
7
02. Soil Health
Soil health is defined as the continued capacity of soil to function as a vital living
system, by recognizing that it contains biological elements that are key to
ecosystem function within land-use boundaries. These functions are able to
sustain biological productivity of soil, maintain the quality of surrounding air and
water environments, as well as promoting plant, animal, and human health.
As per Karlen et al (1997), soil health can be described as “the capacity of a specific
kind of soil to function, within natural or managed ecosystem boundaries, to
sustain plant and animal productivity, maintain or enhance water and air
quality, and support human health and habitation”.
Functions of healthy soils (Figure 3):
• Supplies nutrients, water and oxygen for healthy plant growth
• Allows water to infiltrate freely
• Resists erosion
• Stores water
• Readily exchanges gases with the atmosphere
• Retains nutrients
• Acts as an environmental buffer in the landscape
• Resists diseases
• Contains a large and diverse population of soil biota
• Is not acidifying or salinizing
• Has a range of pore spaces to house organisms, nutrients and water
8
Figure 3: Functions of Soil: (Source: Brady and Weil, 1996)
9
03. Factors Controlling Soil Health
3.1. Soil Type
Particular soil types form in response to the nature of parent material, topography
and environmental factors, such as climate and natural vegetation. Past land
management by humans can alter natural soils considerably, for example by loss
of surface horizons due to erosion, alteration of soil water regime via artificial
drainage, salinization due to poor irrigation practices, loss of natural soil organic
matter caused by arable production or contamination. Thus, land-use and
management are the controlling factors for soil health. A set of fixed characteristics
such as texture, stone content, etc. combine with climate to set an envelope of
possible soil habitat conditions, especially those relating to the soil water regime.
Variable factors such as pH, bulk density and soil organic matter content, which
are influenced by land-use and management, then determine the prevailing
condition of the habitat within the range for a particular soil. These fixed and
variable abiotic factors interact with biotic ones to determine the overall condition
of the soil system and its associated health. Primary biological factors will include
the presence or absence of specific assemblages and types of organisms, the
availability of carbon substrate and nutrients, and the concentrations of toxic
materials.
3 .2. Organisms and Functions
The relationships between community structure and function (Figure 4) are
inevitably complex and a prevalent theme in contemporary soil ecology. They are
underwritten by the three principles of repertoire, interaction and redundancy.
There is some experimental evidence that there may be threshold levels of soil
biodiversity below which functions decline. However, in many instances, this is at
experimentally prescribed unrealistically low levels of diversity that rarely prevail
10
in nature. Many studies demonstrate high levels of functional redundancy in soil
communities. It can be argued that high biodiversity within trophic groups is
advantageous since the group is likely to function more efficiently under a variety
of environmental circumstances, due to an inherently wider potential. More
diverse systems may be more resilient to perturbation since if a proportion of
components are removed or compromised in some way, others that prevail will be
able to compensate. However, more diverse systems may be less efficient since a
greater proportion of available energy is used in generating and countering
competitive interactions between components, a situation which may be
exacerbated by the similarity in functional properties and hence potential niche
competition.
Figure 4:The Importance of Soil Biology for Soil Health
3.3. Carbon and Energy
The energy that drives soil systems is derived from reduced carbon that is
ultimately derived from net primary productivity. Carbon is the common currency
11
of the soil system, and its transfer with associated energy flows is the main
integrating factor. This suggests that the quantities and quality of different organic
matter pools may be indicative of the state of the soil system, while the flows and
allocations of carbon between assemblages of organisms may provide information
about their relationships to ecosystem functions.
3.4. Nutrients
Nutrients are a controlling input to the soil system and the processes within it.
Their levels and transformations are critical to soil health. After carbon, the cycling
of nitrogen and phosphorus to, from and within the soil system most affects its
dynamics and the delivery of ecosystem services, including agricultural
production. Manipulation of nutrient supplies to increase productive outputs from
the soil system by the addition of fertilizers has been one of the keystones of
agriculture for centuries. Nonetheless, knowledge is limited about the impacts of
nutrient additions on the condition of different assemblages of soil organisms and
thence on their functions.
12
04. Ideal Soil Structure
Figure 5: Ideal Composition of a Soil
In general terms, the ideal ratio of solids to water to air in a well-structured soil
profile is approximately 50:23:23, with organic matter (OM) at 4% or greater. It is
shown in figure 5. OM is made up of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium,
together with tracer elements. It influences plant growth by affecting soil pH,
assisting structure, easing cultivations, and supplying nutrients.
In addition to these basic factors, many other elements contribute to good soil
structure and health. These include the vast array of micro- and larger organisms
(Figure 6) that co-exist to form the soil ecosystem. Additionally, maintaining the
correct soil mineral balance helps optimize the health and productivity of crops,
plus assists in creating a stable soil structure. Soils with a high Cation Exchange
Capacity (CEC) are capable of providing high levels of nutrients to the crop and the
correct balance of these elements (particularly Ca and Mn) assists soil stability.
13
Figure 6: Number of Soil Organism in Health Soil
Adopted from
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detailfull/soils/health/biology/?ci
d=nrcs142p2_053865
14
05. Soil Health and Crop Production
Crop production is the preliminary stage of any food chain/ food network. Simply
all the living creatures exists in an eco- system, sustain because of crop production.
As the crop production is much significant; in the other terms the growing medium
of those crops also significant. It means that an important ecosystem service that
the soil provides is to support crop production, upon which humans and many
animals depend for subsistence.
Soils are a crucial ally to food security and nutrition: Food availability relies
on soils: nutritious and good quality food and animal fodder can only be produced
if our soils are healthy living soils. Over the last 50 years, advances in agricultural
technology and increased demand due to a growing population have put our soils
under increasing pressure. In many countries, intensive crop production has
depleted the soil, threatening the soils productive capacity and ability to meet the
needs of future generations.
A healthy soil is a living, dynamic ecosystem, packed with microscopic and larger
organisms that perform many vital functions including converting dead and
decaying matter as well as minerals to plant nutrients (nutrient cycling);
controlling plant disease, insect and weed pests; improving soil structure with
positive effects for soil water and nutrient holding capacity, and ultimately
improving crop production. A healthy soil also contributes to mitigating climate
change by maintaining or increasing its carbon content.
A healthy soil produces healthy crops with minimal amounts of external inputs
and few to no adverse ecological effects (Figure 7). It contains favorable biological,
physical and chemical properties.
15
A healthy agricultural soil is one that is capable of supporting the production of
food and fiber to a level, and with a quality, sufficient to meet human requirements,
and to continue to sustain those functions that are essential to maintain the quality
of life for humans and the conservation of biodiversity. Soil health is an integrative
property that reflects the capacity of soil to respond to agricultural intervention
Some important healthy soil functions related to crop production include:
i. Infiltration and storage of water
ii. Retention and cycling of nutrients
iii. Pest and weed suppression
iv. Detoxification of harmful chemicals
v. Sequestering of carbon
vi. Production of food and fiber.
When the soil is not functioning to its full capacity as a result of soil constraints
then sustainable productivity and net farmer profits over the long term are
jeopardized.
5.1. Factors Influencing Soil Health
Soil management practices, cropping systems, and weather conditions influence
soil health. Therefore, a healthy soil that is well managed can increase soil water
infiltration and storage, storage and supply of nutrients to plants, microbial
diversity, and soil carbon storage. Soil organic matter (SOM) is a central soil
property that is heavily affected by management practices, which in turn
influences soil physical, biological, and chemical functions.
The relationships between soil organic matter and management inputs such as
tillage and cropping systems can be documented through the evaluation of soil
health indicators. Those indicators reflect the level of response of the soil system
to different management inputs. Field and laboratory evaluation of these different
16
indictors can aid in fine tuning management practices to optimize soil biological,
physical, and chemical functions (Figure 7).
Figure 7: Soil Health Indicators and System
The central soil property that influences soil functions is organic matter. The
organic matter component of the soil system is only a small fraction of the topsoil
horizon (ranging from 1-5% or greater by dry weight depending on the soil type
and other formation factors), but essential for the soil physical, biological, and
chemical functions and general soil ecosystem services. The key services for
production agriculture are: nutrient provision and cycling, pest and pathogen
protection, production of growth factors, water availability, and formation of
stable aggregates to reduce the risk of soil erosion. However, these functions are
sequentially influenced by each other starting with organic matter as the building
block for the well linked functions.
17
5.2. Tillage Effect on Soil Health
The increased use of intensive tillage and other management practices in row crop
production systems can increase soil erosion, reduce soil health and water quality,
and the capacity to achieve sustainable agricultural production systems. Soil
erosion is always associated with tillage intensity, especially during the spring
season when soils are most vulnerable to water erosion due to lack of vegetation
or residue cover to protect the soil surface from high rain intensity.
Many factors contribute to this problem, but tillage is the prime contributing
factor. Soils under modern production agriculture have lost significant amount of
their carbon pool because of erosion, decomposition, and leaching. The magnitude
of soil organic carbon (SOC) loss from cultivated soils in the Midwest region of the
United States is estimated to be in the range of 30% to 60% of the amount present
under virgin soil conditions since the conversion from prairie system in late 1800s.
This loss in soil organic matter by cultivation is in part caused by the oxidation of
organic matter and CO2 release in addition to losses through surface runoff and soil
erosion(Figure8).
Soil management and conservation practices that protect soil health are not only
economically and environmentally necessary, but the right approach to sustain
and increase soil resiliency. This can be achieved by adopting conservation plans
that are practical, site specific and an integral component of the overall agriculture
production system to achieve intended objectives.
These conservation plans would include no-tillage and reduced tillage (i.e., strip-
tillage), which leave post-harvest crop residue to cover the soil surface. In addition,
many soil conservation plans include practices such as cover crops, the
construction of grass waterways, terraces, buffer strips, and pasture erosion
control systems with manure application and soil testing.
18
Figure 8: Difference in Water Infiltration in Conventional and No-tillage Practices
19
06. Reasons for Reduction of Soil Health
Figure 9 shows practices which reduce soil health.
Figure 9: How to Reduce Soil Health
quantities, the effect is on process rates rather than any direct toxic effects.
6.1. Aggressive Tillage
Although in short-term, tillage results a warmer, aerated and competition-free
environment suited to seed germination, aggressive tillage fractures the soil, it
disrupts soil structure, accelerating surface runoff and soil erosion. Tillage also
reduces crop residue, which help cushion the force of pounding raindrops.
Without crop residue, soil particles become more easily dislodged, being moved or
'splashed' away. This process is only the beginning of the problem. Splashed
particles clog soil pores, effectively sealing off the soil's surface, resulting in poor
water infiltration. The amount of soil lost from farmland each year is directly
related to soil structure, levels of crop residue remaining on the soil's surface, and
the intensity of tillage practices. When frequent tillage is sustained over a period
20
of years, the impact grows even more severe. A total breakdown of soil structure
and overall soil quality is almost assured. A hardpan can develop, effectively
cutting off root elongation, crop development and yield. Removal of topsoil by
erosion contributes to a loss of inherent soil fertility levels. Approximately half of
plant-available phosphorus is concentrated in topsoil as is nearly all of the plant-
available potassium. Although producers can supply needed crop nutrients to
offset the loss of inherent fertility, the productivity of eroded soils can be restored
by adding inputs only when favorable subsoil material is present. Where
unfavorable subsoils exist (limited rooting depth, coarse sand and gravel, or high
soil densities), there is little or no ability to recover yield losses. The impact on soil
health and productivity is devastating and final.
6.2. Annual/Seasonal Fallow
Leaving soils bare without any active root system can cause significant damage,
not only in terms of potential soil erosion, but also in terms of changes in soil health
and productivity in the following season due to problems such as fallow syndrome.
During the period of leaving soil fallow, several chemical and biological changes
may take place. When soil is left bare without any active root system or under
saturated conditions for an extended period of time, these changes in soil
biological properties can be carried into the next season. Some of these potential
changes are induced by the absence of active root systems in such areas that is
essential in building up the microbial community responsible for nutrient cycling
in the root zone. Because of this, reducing plant residue inputs through the use of
fallow causes a decline in soil OM that starves soil microbes, which in turn limits
the metabolic capacity and biological function of the soil.
Therefore, planting of any annual crop during prevented planting can have
significant value in sustaining such microbial community known as arbuscular
mycorrhizae (AM), which is essential for nutrient cycling such as P.
21
6.3. Monocropping
The lack of diversity in a monoculture system eliminates all the functions that
nature provides to plants and the soil. It means that there are no varieties of plant
that naturally provide nutrients to the soil, such as nitrogen-fixing legumes, or
ground cover crops that can be slashed and left to improve the nutrient content of
the topsoil. Hence there are fewer species of microorganism and bacteria on the
soil as there are fewer nutrients available for them to survive on, and it
undermines the integrity of the soil by not having a variety of plants with different
root depths. As the monocropping have eliminated the natural checks and
balances that a diverse ecosystem provides, monoculture production has to find
ways to replicate some of them in order to protect the crop (and the profits from
it). This inevitably means the use of large quantities of synthetic herbicides,
insecticides, bactericides and fertilizers. These chemicals not removes with
harvests and remains in soil and leads to pollute water reserviors. With no ground
cover plants due to monocropping it reduces moisture retention ability of the soil
and increase runoff. Also monocropping eliminates the ground cover crops which
leads to no natural protection for the soil from erosion by wind and rain. No plants
provide leaf litter mulch to replenish the topsoil, which would be eroded anyway.
All of this combines to continually degrade the soil, often meaning that it becomes
useable for agriculture.
6.4. Annual Crops
In contrast, annual-based agricultural systems typically have much greater
nutrient losses – partly due to the removal of agricultural products from the
landscape and frquent disturbances to the soil, but also due to inefficiencies in
internal nutrient cycling and poor synchronization of nutrient availability with
plant demand. Significant degradation of soil chemical and physical properties
occurred in annual crop fields, relative to the unfertilized and annually harvested
perennial lands. Soils under annual crops contained significantly lower amounts
22
of SOM, SOC, readily oxidizable carbon (ROC), and total soil N than the perennial.
Hence the moisture retention ability of soil, microbial population in soil, microbial
activities in the soil are declined. Soil exposition is high and due to that the soil
erosion can occur. In long-term, the soil become more infertile and cannot recover.
6.5. Excessive Inorganic Fertilizer Use
Since salt content is one of the most critical characteristics of Inorganic fertilizers;
they are expected to be harmful to agriculture in the long run as salts are harmful
for plants as well as soil. Continuous use of these Inorganic chemical fertilizers
depletes essential soil nutrients and minerals that are naturally found in fertile
soil. When we use inorganic fertilizers excessively; they do not help replenish soil
nutrients and its fertility contrary to the popular belief; but, replenish only
nitrogen, potassium and phosphorous. And we know phosphorous does not
dissolve in water and its overuse may cause hardening of soil. Likewise alkaline
fertilizers like sodium-nitrate develop alkalinity in soil reducing its fertility and
making it barren. So to say; soil fertility and vegetation depend much on the
balanced supply of essential nutrients and minerals. As such, overuse of specific
nutrients may cause imbalance in the supply of soil nutrients further resulting in
soil degradation and the loss of equilibrium of a stable soil. Also can result in
negative effects such as leaching, pollution of water resources, destruction of
micro-organisms and friendly insects, crop susceptibility to disease attack,
acidification or alkalization of the soil or reduction in soil fertility thus causing
irreparable damage to the overall system. They enhance the decomposition of soil
OM which leads to degradation of soil structure.
6.6. Excessive Crop Residue Removal
Crop residue serve as a natural blanket to protect the soil surface. When remove
the crop residue, soil exposition is high and leads insolation, erosive impacts of
raindrops and blowing wind. As the surface sealing is removed, soil hydrological
properties also reduces. Lower the saturated/unsaturated hydraulic conductivity,
23
reduce water infiltration/rate, and increasing runoff rate and amount. It leads to
lower the soil mosture content, soil microbial content. Bare soils lose moisture
soon after the protective mulch cover is removed. Also soil compaction increases
and increases the breakdown and dispersion of soil aggregates. Thus it breakes
the aggregate stability of soil. Aggregate stability is one of the soil properties most
sensitive to crop residue removal. It decreases with decrease in surface residue
cover. Surface aggregates in soils without residue mulch are readily dispersed
under the erosive forces of impacting raindrops. Accordingly the soil structure
destroys with the excessive crop removal. Stability of aggregates is positively
correlated with SOM concentration.
6.7. Broad Spectrum fumigant (Pesticides)
Pesticides can move off-site contaminating surface and groundwater and possibly
causing adverse impacts on aquatic ecosystems. They can be moved from soil by
runoff and leaching, thereby constituting a problem for the supply of drinking water
to the population. Also it reduces the soil quality by reducing capacity of the soil to
filter, buffer, degrade, immobilize, and detoxify. Heavy treatment of soil with
pesticides can cause populations of beneficial soil microorganisms to decline. Overuse
of pesticides have effects on the soil organisms that are similar to human overuse of
antibiotics. Indiscriminate use of chemicals might work for a few years, but after
awhile, there aren't enough beneficial soil organisms to hold onto the nutrients. For
example, plants depend on a variety of soil microorganisms to transform atmospheric
nitrogen into nitrates, which plants can use. Common landscape herbicides disrupt
this process: triclopyr inhibits soil bacteria that transform ammonia into nitrite.
6.8. Broad Spectrum Herbicides
The risk of environmental pollution through the leaching of pesticides out of soils
into water bodies is affected by how strongly the compound is sorbed to soil. Some
pesticides like glyphosate have strong sorption characteristics, reducing the risk
24
of leaching. Hence the retention of glyphosate in soils and water bodies is high and
it badly affect for some soil organisms. Herbicides can harm non-target organisms,
particularly amphibians, symbiotic mycorrhizal fungi or earthworms. They can
reduce the activitity and reproduction of the earthworm. Thus the service come
from earthworms like shredding plant litter, mineralising it and soil organic
matter in their guts, and producing casts that enhance soil nutrient availability and
promote plant productivity. Their burrowing enhances soil root penetration and
water infiltration. Also Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) improve water access
and soil minerals for plants, improve drought tolerance and help with resistance
against pathogens. Recent research has found that glyphosate (and/or its
metabolite AMPA) reduces the spore viability and root colonisation of AMF, and
could reduce plant diversity.
25
07. Soil Health Management
7.1. Conservation Agriculture and Managing Soil Health
Figure 10: Soil Health Principles
Basic Soil health management principles are (Figure 10);
- minimize soil disturbance it means reduce or minimize soil tillage
- maximize soil cover it means improve mulching
- maximize biodiversity
- maximize continuous living roots
Conservation agriculture is an agricultural system which has much concern on the
soil health. ‘Conservation agriculture (CA) is not business as usual, based on
maximizing yields while exploiting the soil and agro-ecosystem resources. Rather,
CA is based on optimizing yields and profits, to achieve a balance of agricultural,
26
economic and environmental benefits. It advocates that the combined social and
economic benefits gained from combining production and protecting the
environment, including reduced input and labor costs, are greater than those from
production alone. With CA, farming communities become providers of more
healthy living environments for the wider community through reduced use of
fossil fuels, pesticides, and other pollutants, and through conservation of
environmental integrity and services’ (Dumanski et al., 2006). It has three main
principles. They are;
- minimum soil disturbance
No tillage is defined as a way to farm without disturbing the soil through
tillage. No tillage must leave at least 30% of area covered by plant residues
right after crop establishment, and crops are sown using machinery which is
able to place seeds through plant residues from previous crops. The
agronomic practice that best characterizes conservation agriculture for
annual crops is no tillage/ minimum tillage, which has the highest degree of
soil conservation in annual crops, since the mechanical tillage of the ground
is completely suppressed.
- permanent soil cover (mulching)
Groundcovers is the most widely used conservation agriculture agronomic
practice for perennial crops, whereby the soil surface between rows of trees
remains protected against erosion. With this technique, at least 30% of the
soil not covered by the canopy is protected either by sown cover crops,
spontaneous vegetation or inert covers, such as pruning residues or tree
leaves.
- crop rotation and intercropping
These practices reduce requirements for pesticides and herbicides, control
off-site pollution, and enhance biodiversity.
27
According to principles related to soil health and conservation agriculture,
conservation agriculture helps to maximize soil health.
7.2. Practices for Improve Soil Health
Below practices (Figure 11) tend to promote soil health.
Figure 11: How to Promote Soil Health
7.2.1. No – Till or Conservation Tillage
Conservation tillage is a tillage system that conserves soil, water and energy
resources through the reduction of tillage intensity and retention of crop residue.
It involves the planting, growing and harvesting of crops with limited disturbance
to the soil surface.
28
Figure 12: Strip Tilling is One Method to Prevent Loss in Soil Quality due to Excessive Tilling
Source: Idowu and Flynn, 2013
Reduced or minimum tillage practices can lead to an accumulation of soil organic
matter. Soil organic matter is rapidly lost through conventional plow-disk tillage
practices. Conventional tillage, which involves turning over the entire plow depth,
exposes large quantities of soil organic matter to oxidation. With reduced tillage
practices, such as no-till, strip-till (Figure 12) or zone-till, smaller amounts of soil
organic matter are exposed to oxidation, which leads to more organic matter in the
soil profile over a long period of time. Reduced tillage can be challenging to
implement, especially when new tillage tools become necessary, and may require
considerable financial outlay. However, through careful thinking, planning, and
consultation with experts, growers can work out adaptable reduced tillage
practices on their farms, which can ultimately benefit soil health and sustainable
productivity of the soil.
29
7.2.1.1. Features of no till or minimum tillage system
1. Soil conservation
- Soil erosion can be reduced through leaving the soil untilled.
- Runoff is reduced by more than half in the no-till soils when
compared with tilled soil.
2. Water conservation
- The improved infiltration is an important characteristic of the no-till
system
- The mulch cover and the higher organic matter content under ‘no-till’
increases the retention of soil moisture and decreases evaporation
losses from the soil
3. Soil fertility
- Soil organic matter contents are usually higher and bulk densities
lower under ‘no-till’ than under conventional tillage system
- Large quantities of nutrients and organic matter are saved from
erosion by the ‘no-till’ methods
Table 1: The Loss of Organic Matter according to Tillage
Types of Tillage Organic Matter Lost in 19
Days, (Kg/ha)
Mould board plough + disc harrow
(2x)
4300
Mould board plough 2230
Disc harrow 1840
Chisel plough 1720
Direct seeding 860
30
According to table 1, in direct seeding; it means no till organic matter loss is
lower than others. So that no till or conservation tillage enhance soil
fertility.
4. Soil temperatures
- Soil temperatures and diurnal fluctuations usually observed to be
lower under ‘no-till’.
5. Crop yields
Figure 13: Intensive Tillage vs Long Term No-Till
Adopted from http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/environment/bmp/no-
till.htm)
- Zero tillage’ and ‘minimum tillage’ systems give better crop yields
than the conventional methods of cultivation.
- Figure 13 is showed how to root system penetrate in conventional
and conservation tillage. In conventional tillage, soil is compact
within the time and can’t penetrate roots in deep layer of soil. But in
conservation tillage, can penetrate root in deeper layer of soil and
31
well distributed. Reasons for that, soils are not compacted in
conservation tillage. Other thing is soil fertility is higher in
conservation tillage soil than conventional tillage soil. So that crop
yield is increased in conservation tillage soil.
6. Weed control
- Weed control is the most problematic situation in no-till system.
However, a holistic strategy should be used for controlling weeds
under no till system.
- Planting cover crops and increasing planting density are some ways
to do that.
7. Energy, time and economics
- Tillage, both mechanical and manual, is highly energy consuming but
‘No-till’ techniques have shown a remarkable reduction in the energy
required.
- Power requirement involved in farming ‘no-till’ and conservation
tillage is shown dramatic saving in time and energy than
conventional tillage.
When considering above features, no tillage / conservation tillage practice helps
to improve soil health.
7.2.2. Mulching and Cover Cropping
Mulch is a layer of crop residue placed on the soil surface. Mainly mulch can be
divided in to in situ and live mulch. The term in situ mulch refers to the residues
of dead or chemically killed cover crops which are used on the same land on which
they were grown. The live-mulch system is a crop production technique in which
food crops are planted directly in a low-growing cover crop with minimum soil
32
disturbance. Its main advantage is that it smothers weeds, and it can play an
important role in soil conservation and maintenance of soil fertility.
Using cover crops can benefit soil health and crop productivity in the long run.
Cover crops are planted between cash crops to protect the soil from erosion and
improve soil health and fertility.
Examples for live mulch legume species:
Pueraria phaseoloides Centrosema pubescens
Arachis prostrate Macroptilium atropurpureum
33
Psophocarpus palustris
7.2.2.1. Benefits of Mulching/ Cover Cropping
1. Control soil erosion
Cover crops can provide protection during the periods when a primary crop
is not present. Plant residues reduce the impact of raindrops that otherwise
would detach soil particles and make them prone to erosion. Surface runoff
is slowed by the cover, allowing improved moisture infiltration. Not only
does the above ground growth provide soil protection, but also the root
system helps stabilize the soil by infiltrating the profile and holding it in
place. Cover crops and their decaying residues reduce pollution by
preventing runoff of nutrients and pesticides into surface water.
34
2. Add organic matter to soil
Although increases in soil organic matter occur slowly over time, including
cover crops in the rotation can help maintain or slightly increase soil
organic matter. As organic matter and plant residues degrade, they produce
compounds that cement soil components together into aggregates, resulting
in improved structure and tilth. Aggregates contribute to greater soil
permeability, aeration, water infiltration and holding capacity, cation
exchange capacity, and ease of crop emergence and root growth.
3. Recycling or scavenging unused nutrients
Certain cover crops tend to be very efficient at recycling or scavenging
excess nutrients. When the cover crop dies or is removed as forage, some of
the nitrogen will be released and reused by future crops or utilized as
protein in the feed.
4. Increase diversity of beneficial organism
Increased plant residues and the tillage practices generally associated with
cover crop systems may improve the soil environment for certain beneficial
organisms. Organisms such as earthworms, insects, and microorganisms
can improve soil quality and increase nutrient availability by quickly
decomposing organic matter and plant residues. Earthworms in particular
help improve water infiltration and soil structure. Other insects that are
attracted to the cover crop vegetation may provide benefits by preying on
harmful pests.
5. Partial weed control
Cover crops partially control some weeds by competing with them for light,
moisture, nutrients, and space. Cover crops and their residues can act as
mulches or physical barriers by smothering weeds, suppressing weed seed
germination and growth, and lowering soil temperatures. Allelopathic
35
compounds which are released from living or decaying plant tissue,
chemically interfere with weed growth.
6. Fixation of atmospheric nitrogen
Legumes, in association with certain bacteria, have the ability to acquire and
fix nitrogen from the atmosphere. When high nitrogen legume residues
remain in the field, they break down and release nitrogen and other
nutrients, which can then be used by subsequent crops.
7. Possible feed source
Certain cover crops, especially grass species, also can be used for livestock
feed. These crops can be grazed or mechanically harvested as haylage or
hay. With proper management, grazing will have a similar effect, because
even though the tops are harvested or grazed, root mass and stubble remain
to provide protection from erosion.
7.2.3. Crop Diversification /Crop Rotation
Crop rotation is the practice of growing a series of dissimilar/ different types of
crops in the same area in sequential seasons. Good crop rotation can mitigate soil-
borne diseases and improve soil health Rotation is the sequence of crop cultivation
on the farm. It is usually a better farming practice to alternate crops of different
families from season to season or year to year (Figure 14). For instance, cereals
(small grains) can follow legumes such as alfalfa or beans since legumes can fix
nitrogen, which will benefit the following cereal crop after the legume residue has
been worked into the soil. Planning a rotation is farm-specific and is often based
on many factors, including soil type, equipment, water availability, and markets.
36
Figure 14: Crop Rotation
7.2.3.10. Benefits of crop rotation
1. Many crops may have positive effects on succeeding crops in the rotation,
leading to greater production overall.
2. Rotation are used to reduce pests and diseases in the cropping system and
to control weeds by including smothering crop species (e.g. cowpeas) or
green manure cover crops.
3. Improved soil quality (more or deeper roots; root exudates).
4. Better distribution of nutrients in the soil profile (deep-rooted crops bring
up nutrients from below).
5. Increase biological activity.
6. Through rotations, peak labor times may be reduced and labour better
distributed throughout the year if planting and harvest times are different.
Legume Root
FruitLeaf
Onions, Garlic, Beets, Carrots,Radishes
Tomatoes, Cucumbers,Peppers, Eggplant,Melons
Beans, Peas, Lima beans, Potatoes
Lettuce, Herbs, Spinach
37
7. Crop rotations may decrease the risk created by extreme weather events
such as droughts or floods and their effects, as bad seasons or bad parts of
a season may affect some crops more than others.
8. Crop rotations can balance the production of residues by alternating crops
that produce few and/or short-lived residues with crops that produce a lot
of durable residues.
Crop rotation practice reduces requirements for pesticides and herbicides,
control off-site pollution, and enhance biodiversity. The objective is to
complement natural soil biodiversity and to create a healthy soil
microenvironment that is naturally aerated, better able to receive, hold and
supply plant available water, provides enhanced nutrient cycling, and better
able to decompose and mitigate pollutants. Crop rotations and associations can
be in the form of crop sequences, relay cropping, and mixed crops.
7.2.4. Use of Organic Fertilizer
Organic amendments can help build up the soil organic matter and consequently
improve the overall soil quality. Many materials are available as organic
amendments, including manure, compost, and guano, among others. Organic
amendments vary in how much nutrients they can supply to the crop, and it is
therefore important to know the nutrient composition of the amendment material.
The amount of nutrients that can be made available from an organic amendment
depends on the initial nutrient content in the material, its C: N ratio, its soil
mineralization rate (which in turn is dependent on soil temperature and
moisture), and existing levels of soil nutrient (based on soil test). It is a good
practice to send the organic material to a laboratory for analysis so as to determine
the quantity of amendment to add to the soil for meeting plant nutrient demands
38
that can’t be supplied by the soil itself. Note that adding large quantities of compost
with only modest concentrations of nutrient elements can add significantly to the
soluble salt level in the soil.
7.2.5 Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
IPM is a system that maintains the population of any pest, or pests, at or below the
economic threshold level that causes damage or loss, and which minimizes
adverse impacts on society and environment. Two or more pest control methods
such as biological, cultural, mechanical and chemical are used.
7.2.5.1. The IPM process
IPM process has four steps (Figure 15). In the first step, identify the problem by
observing the plant. Secondly, look at the problem is severe or problem is below
or above economic threshold level. According to condition of problem, appropriate
treatment methods (biological, mechanical, cultural or chemical) are selected in
thirdly. Finally, selected treatment method should apply.
Figure 15: IPM Process
Identify• Observe the plant and find the source of the problem
Assess• How large is the problem
Choose
• Select an appropriate treatment method• Always balance effectiveness with impact
Apply• Impement the treatment method
39
7.2.5.2. Pest Control Methods
Main pest control methods are biological method, mechanical method, cultural
method and chemical method (Figure 15).
I. Biological control method
• Biological organisms are manipulated to control pest.
• In here predators/ parasites are released in to the field.
Figure 16: Pest Control Methods
II. Cultural control method
• Cultural control method is agronomic practices that are designed to
optimize growing conditions for the crop. Anything that increases a crop’s
competitive edge will result in increased tolerance to pests often resulting
in reduced pesticide use.
• Unfavorable conditions are created for the pest.
• Examples for cultural control
- Changes in frequency or timing of irrigation
- Pruning to increase air circulation or prevent contact with soil
- Field sanitation between cropping
Biological Control
Manipulation of biological organism
Cultural Control
Agronomic practices
Mechanical Control
Uses machinery and/or other tools to control pests
Chemical Control
Use of bio-rational or synthetic chemical compounds to kill
pest
IPM
40
III. Mechanical control method
• Machinery and/or other tools such as tillage, physical barriers are used to
control pests.
• Row cultivation is an example of mechanical pest control.
• Row cultivation can be used as a stand-alone pest control practice or in
conjunction with a herbicide program.
• Also, some vegetable growers will use a barrier of black plastic to control
pest.
IV. Chemical control method
• Bio-rational or synthetic chemical compounds are used to kill pest.
• Various types of commercially produced chemical pesticides (liquid
pesticides, solid poisons, fumigants, herbicides, fungicides) are used.
• Bio-rational such as Neem leaves or seeds, hot pepper, tobacco, wood ash,
soap, vegetable oil are also can be used.
• The chemical sex attractant (Pheromones) used by many insect species to
draw mates.
• Repellants is a way to prevent pest insect damage is to repel them with a
substance that can be sprayed on the plants (Garlic barrier, Hot pepper wax,
Neem extracts, Pyrethrins, Rotenones)
7. 2.5.3. Benefits of IPM
• Encourage Biodiversity
In IPM, usually practice eco- friendly methods such as biological, cultural. It
minimizes application of chemical method. Hence, soil macro and
microorganisms are conserved in and give better environment for those
organisms.
41
• Usually less expensive
Traditionally, the use of the pesticides to control the pest invasion would
account to lots of cost. Also, these pesticides need to be imported as well the
application of IPM would lessen the financial burden. Moreover, different
techniques involved in IPM are more sustainable with long lasting benefits.
• Minimizes hazards of pesticides
It is obvious that in an IPM schedule the use of pesticides will be
considerably reduced, hence the pesticide residue hazards will also get
automatically minimized.
In IPM, crop rotation, conservation tillage like cultural practices are
practiced. Planting the same crops year after year can lead to a buildup of
crop pests and reduced soil fertility. Crop rotation breaks the life crop-
specific or over-winter on-site. Rotation can significantly reduce pesticide
use. Due to conservation tillage, soil erosion is reduced. So that, soil and
water conditions are enhanced, and improve soil health, tilth, and increase
crop vigor.
7.2.6. Integrated Weed Management (IWM)
An integrated weed management can be defined as the combination of two or
more weed-control methods at low input levels to reduce weed competition in a
given cropping system below the economical threshold level.
Varieties of technologies are used in a single weed management with the objective
to produce optimum crop yield at a minimum cost taking in to consideration
ecological and socio-economic constraints under a given agro-ecosystem.
42
IWM is a system in which two or more methods are used to control a weed. These
methods may include cultural practices, natural enemies and selective herbicides.
7.2.6.1. Benefits of IWM
• It shifts the crop-weed competition in favour of crop
• Prevents weed shift towards perennial nature
• Prevents resistance in weeds to herbicides
• No danger of herbicide residue in soil or plant
• No environmental pollution
• Gives higher net return
• Suitable for high cropping intensity
43
08. Future Challenges and Opportunities Soil Health Management
Four key areas where future challenges and opportunities exist are identified to
advance the agro ecological management of soil health.
• Opening the black box:
The notion of the soil as a living resource whose health is essential for
agricultural sustainability is emerging as it becomes possible to ‘see’ soil
biota more clearly within what was previously considered a ‘black box’.
Using the growing suite of new technologies to open this black box will
allow us to develop a more generalizable understanding about how to
manage soil biodiversity and function. This is particularly important in the
context of the demands of climate change adaptation.
• Above-ground/below-ground interactions:
Developing a better understanding of the way in which agricultural
management and soil biota interact is a necessary prerequisite to determine
the plant densities, arrangements, species and management systems that
are needed to generate a sufficient quantity and quality of biomass, while
maintaining the essential ecosystem functions provided by soil biota in
agricultural landscapes.
• Mapping soil-based ecosystem services:
Identifying, quantifying and mapping hotspots of ecosystem service
providers will contribute to a predictive knowledge of soil-based ecosystem
services. This includes the temporal and spatial dynamics of ecosystem
service provision resulting from various environmental factors.
44
• Soil health monitoring systems:
Developing local soil health monitoring systems to evaluate ecosystem
service provision performance can help to guide local policy (e.g. as part of
payments for ecosystem services schemes), while complementing national
and international monitoring systems that are aimed at high-level natural
resources management and policy.
45
09. Bibliography
A. K. Indoria, Ch. Srinivasa Rao, K. L. Sharma and K. Sammi Reddy, 2017,
Conservation agriculture – a panacea to improve soil physical health, ICAR-
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500 059,
India, 112(1): 52-61.
Bijay Singh and John Ryan, 2015, Managing Fertilizers to Enhance Soil Health, First
edition, IFA, Paris, France, Available from: www.fertilizer.org/Library.
Edmundo Barrios, Keith Shepherd and Fergus Sinclair, 2014, Soil Health and
Agricultural Sustainability: the role of soil biota, World Agroforestry Centre
(ICRA F), Nairobi, Kenya, Agroecology for Food Security and Nutrition -
Proceedings of the FAO International Symposium, 104-120
John Idowu and Robert Flynn, 2013, Understanding Soil Health for Production
Agriculture in New Mexico, College of Agricultural, Consumer and
Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University.
Kibblewhite M.G., Ritz K., and Swift M.J., 2007, Soil health in agricultural systems,
Journal article- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 363(1492):
685–701., Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PM
C2610104/
Vikas Rai1, Pragati Pramanik, Pramila Aggarwal, Prameela Krishnan and Ranjan
Bhattacharyya, 2018, International Journal of Current Microbiology and
Applied Sciences, Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2018) 7(2): 373-389.
46
Bonilla, N.; Gutiérrez-Barranquero, J.A.; Vicente, A.D.; Cazorla, F.M. Enhancing Soil
Quality and Plant Health Through Suppressive Organic
Amendments. Diversity 2012, 4, 475-491.
Karlen, D. L., Mausbach, M. J.,Doran J. W., Cline, R. G., Harris, R. F., and Schuman
G. E., 1997. Soil Quality: A Concept, Definition, and Framework for Evaluation.
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61:4-10
Dumanski, J., R. Peiretti, J. Benetis, D. McGarry, and C. Pieri. 2006. The
paradigm of conservation tillage. Proc. World Assoc. Soil and Water
Conserv., P1: 58-64.
Shrestha, A., Laninisteve, T., Vargas, W., MITCHELL, J., 2006. Conservation Tillage
and Weed Management. Publication 8200. University of California, Division
of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
Jonas, F. Weber, Christoph Kunz, Gerassimos G. Peteinatos, Sabine Zikeli and
Roland Gerhards, 2017. Weed Control Using Conventional Tillage, Reduced
Tillage, No-Tillage, and Cover Crops in Organic Soybean. Available from :
doi:10.3390/agriculture7050043
Rangarajan, A., 2012. Crop Rotation Effects on Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition
(Online). Available from: https://www.sare.org/Learning-
Center/Books/Crop-Rotation-on-Organic-Farms/Text-Version/Physical-
and-Biological-Processes-In-Crop-Production/Crop-Rotation-Effects-on-
Soil-Fertility-and-Plant-Nutrition
Al-Kaisi, M. (2018). Frequent tillage and its impact on soil quality. Intergrated
Crop Management, IOWA State University-Extension and Outreach.
Available at https://crops.extension.iastate.edu/frequent-tillage-and-its-
impact-soil-quality.
47
Al-Kaisi, M (2013). Prevented Planting and Soil Health. Intergrated Crop
Management, IOWA State University-Extension and Outreach. Available at
https://crops.extension.iastate.edu/cropnews/2013/06/prevented-
planting-and-soil-health.
Anonymous. (2017). 6 Problems with Monoculture Farming, Regenerative.com.
Available at https://www.regenerative.com/magazine/six-problems-
monoculture-farming
Culman,S.W., DuPont, S.T., Glover, J. D., Buckley, D.H., FickG.W., Ferris, H and Crew,
T.E. (2010). Long-term impacts of high-input annual cropping and
unfertilized perennial grass production on soil properties and
belowground food webs in Kansas, USA. Agriculture, Ecosystems and
Environment,137(2010):13-24pp.
Chen, J. (2006). THE COMBINED USE OF CHEMICAL AND ORGANIC FERTILIZERS
AND/OR BIOFERTILIZER FOR CROP GROWTH AND SOIL FERTILITY.
Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, National Chung Hsing
University, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Gaupp-Berghausen,M., Hofer,M., Rewald. B and Zaller, J.G. (2015). Glyphosate-based
herbicides reduce the activity and reproduction of earthworms and lead to
increased soil nutrient concentrations. Scientific Reports, volume 5,
Article number: 12886
Blanco-Canqui, and Lal , R. (2009). Crop Residue Removal Impacts on Soil
Productivity and Environmental Quality. Critical Reviews in Plant Science,
28:139–163pp.
48
Aktar, M., W, Sengupta, D and Chowdhury, A. (2009). Impact of pesticides use in
agriculture: their benefits and hazards. Available at
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2984095/.
J. Arriaga, F. (2014). Soil Health & Tillage-Long-term Impacts. [e-book] Dept. of
Soil Science & UW-Extension at:
https://cornsoyexpo.org/2014_Presentations/SoilHealthandTillage.pdf
Yayeh Bitew and Melkamu Alemayehu, 2017. Impact of Crop Production Inputs
on Soil Health: A Review. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 16: 109-131.
Al- Kaisi, M. (2016). Soil Health Benefits for Sustaining Crop Production. [Blog]
Integrated Crop Management Search form Search. Available at:
http://April 13, 2016
Curiel-Ballesteros, A. (2009). Soil Health and Food Production: The Case of Corn
Crop Yields in Zapopan, México. Epidemiology, 20, p.S24.
Healthy soils are the basis for healthy food production. (2015). [Blog] healthy
soils for a healthy life. Available at: http://www.fao.org/soils-
2015/news/news-detail/en/c/277682/
Idowu, J. and Flynn, R. (2013). Understanding Soil Health for Production
Agriculture in New Mexico. NM State University, p.4. Available at:
https://aces.nmsu.edu/pubs/_a/A148.pdf