SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John...

27
SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley

Transcript of SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John...

Page 1: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

SofaKing:The Lazy-Man Futon

Chris WooldridgeLoren HanklaAnkur DesaiJT Stukes

Barrett EvansJohn Pendley

Page 2: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Agenda

• Problem Statement

• Functional Requirements

• Design Partition

• Solution

• Engineering Analysis

• Prototype

• Conclusions

• Questions

Page 3: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Problem Statement

• Futons can be bulky and difficult to adjust

• Create a method to transform the futon with minimal user effort

• Mechanism must be cost efficient

• Must be able to endure normal everyday use by an adult

Page 4: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Functional Requirements

• Single hand operation (maximum of 20 lbs of force)• Reliable in terms of life expectancy of design• Safely move back and forth without fast moving parts• Futon should not hit wall or floor when converting• Minimize areas where fingers or clothing may get caught• No sharp corners or edges• “Lock” mechanisms to prevent accidental shifting• Aesthetically pleasing• Fairly lightweight

Page 5: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Design Partition• User Interface: The mechanism the user will

access to adjust the futon

• Sit-up Mechanism: This will transform the futon from the down position to the up position

• Lay-Down Mechanism: This will transform the futon from the up position to the down position

• Moving from Wall Mechanism: This will allow the user to open the futon without having to move the entire unit away from the wall

Page 6: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Solution: The Lazy-Man Futon

Page 7: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

The Lazy-Man Futon

Page 8: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Locking Mechanism: Upright

Page 9: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Locking Mechanism: Down

Page 10: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Total System: Down

Page 11: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Engineering Analysis

Page 12: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Bolt Shear Stress Calc.

2/4)( dForcestressshear

Single Shear Equations

22 /604)83(/)6400(*4 inlbsinchboltslbs

Double Shear Equations

2/*2)( dForcestressshear

SAE Grade 5 bolts – Bolt Shear Strength 120,000 psi

Page 13: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Beam Deflection Calculations

• Frames will be made from 1 inch O.D. tubing. The thickness of each tube will be 0.3 inches

• Lower Frame will be designed to support two adult males. Each male is assumed to weigh less than 200 lbs.

• Maximum beam deflection shall be calculated and checked

Page 14: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Beam Deflection Calc.

22 4324

alEI

WaCenteratDeflection

alEI

WaLoadsatDeflection 43

6

2

236

avlvEI

WaLoadsBetweenDeflection

SteelAISIkpsiModulusElasticE 1030000,30)(

)(4

41

42 rrI

Moment of Inertia for Tubular Beam

Page 15: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Summary of Beam Deflection

Page 16: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Torsion Spring Design

• Torsion Spring should require no more than 20lbs to lower upper rail

• Mattress should not weigh more than 40 lbs. Similar mattress weighed 35 lbs.

• Weight of frame is calculated to be less than 30 lbs.

• Weight of Individuals shall be supported by the Locking Mechanism, not the torsion springs.

Page 17: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Weight of Upper and Lower Frame

inchesTubingofLengthTotal 368

TubingofLengthTotalLengthUnitPer

TubeofVolumeSteelofVolumeTotal *

SteelofDensitySteelofVolumeFrameOfWeight /

Length of Tubing = 328 inches

Density of Steel = 490 lbs / ft3

Weight of Frame = 40.5 lbs

22

122 )

44( in

dd

LengthUnitPer

TubeofVolume

Page 18: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Loading of Upper Frame

Page 19: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Torsion Spring Design

• Balance moments about pin connection to calculate necessary strength of spring

• Minimum spring strength necessary to prevent back from moving equals 0.8125 (lbs – in/deg).

DN

EdRt 2.10

4

3

2.10

d

MS

d = Wire size (inches) D = Mean diameter (inches) Torsion Spring.N = Number of active coils (front side) Rt = Rate of Torsion (Inch-lbs./Rev.)

S = Stress (lbs. /sq. inch)

M = Moment (Inch-lbs.)

P = Load (lbs.)

Page 20: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Range for Spring Constant

Converted:

Minimum Spring Constant – 9.75 (lb-in/deg)

Maximum Spring Constant – 12.0 (lb-in/deg)

Page 21: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Constructing the Prototype

Page 22: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

The Lazy-Man Prototype

Page 23: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Spring: Upright and Down

Page 24: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Sliding Mechanism: Drawer Slides

Page 25: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Lazy-Man Futon VideosLinks:

Page 26: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Conclusions

• A viable design was for a futon that can easily be adjusted was created

• SofaKing feels that there is a place in the market for such a product

• Several additional considerations to the design should be made in terms of materials– Bolts appeared to be much stronger than needed– Metal tubing may be thicker than necessary– SofaKing feels that there is a place in the market for

such a product

Page 27: SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.

Questions?