SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11 1

Society of American Military Engineers

FY2012 Department of Energy Programs

Michael A. Peek, P.E., CCE, CFMOffice of Engineering & Construction Management

(OECM)

September 22, 2011Army Navy Club

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11

DOE Organization

• $11.8B Budget (NNSA)• Nuclear non-proliferation• Nuclear weapons stewardship

• $6.1B Budget (EM)• Demo, remediation and restoration• $.2B Budget (LM)• Long-term stewardship

• $5.4B Budget (SC)• Advanced scientific computing• Basic energy sciences• Fusion energy• High energy physics• Nuclear physics• Biological & environmental research

• $4.8B Budget• Nuclear Energy(NE)• Fossil Energy (FE)• Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE)• Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability (OE)

2

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11 3

Major DOELaboratories & Field Facilities• .

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11 4

Office of Engineering and Construction Management (OECM)

• Project Management (PM) and Real Property Management Policy, Guidance and Oversight

• Validate project performance baseline (scope, cost and schedule) before Congressional Budget Request: Projects with a Total Project Cost (*TPC) ≥$100M- Conduct External Independent Review (EIRs)- Conduct Independent Cost Reviews/Estimates (ICRs/ICEs)

• Monitor Project Performance on behalf of Deputy Secretary- All Projects with a TPC ≥$10M- Oversee DOE Earned Value Management System Certification

* Total Project Cost = Design + Construction + Other Direct Costs

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11 5

PM Differences: DOE vs. DOD

• Program vs. Project- Bundling (DOE) vs. De-Bundling (DOD)

• Major Items of Equipment, “MIE” (e.g., Linear Accelerator Systems vs. Aircraft Trainers)- In Project (DOE) vs. Out of Project (DOD)

• Incremental Funding (DOE) vs. Full Funding (DOD)

• Cost Contracting (DOE) vs. Firm Fixed Price (DOD)

• M&O (Management and Operations) Interface vs. Government

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11

Program $ M

NNSA 11,783

EM 6,130

SC 5,416

EE 3,200

NE 852

FE 521

OE 238

LM 170

Other (corporate management) 1,237

Total (FY12 request is +11.8% of FY10 request) 29,547

6

FY12 Congressional Budget Requestby Program ($M)

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11

Project Portfolio

7

Critical Decision 0 – Approve Mission NeedCritical Decision 1 – Selection of Alternative and Cost RangeCritical Decision 2 – Approve Performance BaselineCritical Decision 3 – Start ConstructionCritical Decision 4 – Project Completion/Transition to Operations

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11

ProjectTPC Range

($M)Contractor

Remote Handled Low Level Waste Disposal Project, Idaho National Laboratory, ID

65 to 95 TBD

Glass Waste Storage Building (GWSB) #3 @ Savannah River, SC

90 to 130 TBD

Muon to Electron Conversion (Mu2E) @ Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, IL

145 to 205 TBD

Advanced Photon Source (APS) Upgrade Argonne National Laboratory, IL

300 to 400 TBD

Linac Coherent Light Source II (LCLS II) @ SLAC National Accelerator Center, CA

350 to 520 TBD

Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment (LBNE) @ Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, IL

660 to 940 TBD

8

In Planning (CD-0)

Critical Decision 0 – Approve Mission NeedCritical Decision 1 – Selection of Alternative and Cost Range

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11 9

In Planning (CD-1)

Project TPC ($M) Contractor

Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) Second Target Station @ Oak Ridge National Laboratory

800 to 1,500

University of Tennessee and Battelle Memorial Institute, LLC

Next Generation Light Source (NGLS) @ Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

900 to 1,500 TBD

Calcine Disposition Project (CDP) @ Idaho National Laboratory

2,000 to 16,000CH2M-WG Idaho, LLC

Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Decontamination and Decommissioning @ Piketon, OH

6,000 to 12,000 TBD

Critical Decision 1 – Selection of Alternative and Cost RangeCritical Decision 2 – Approve Performance Baseline

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11

Project Portfolio (Post CD-2 )

Project Size No. Projects TPC ($M)

Under $20M 21 $335.6

$20M to $100M 47 $2,632.8

$100M to $750M 19 $5,349.7

Over $750M 6 $22,878.2

TOTAL 93 $31,196.2

10

Critical Decision 2 – Approve Performance BaselineCritical Decision 3 – Start Construction

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11 11

In Design (Post CD-2)

Project TPC ($M) Contractor

Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement Nuclear Facility (CMRR NF)@ Los Alamos National Laboratory

3,700 to 5,800Los Alamos National Security, LLC

Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) @ Oak Ridge Y-12 Site

4,200 to 6,500Babcock & Wilcox Y-12, LLC

Pit Disassembly and Conversion Facility (PDCF) @ Savannah River Site

TBDSavannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC

U.S. Contribution to ITER @ Oak Ridge, TN and Cadarache, France

1,450 to 2,200

University of Tennessee and Battelle Memorial Institute, LLC

Critical Decision 2 – Approve Performance Baseline

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11

ProjectTPC ($M)

CD-4 Contractor

Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment (SBWT) @ Idaho National Lab

517 Q1FY2012CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC

K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant Decontamination and Decommissioning (K-25) @ Oak Ridge National Lab

1,397 Q1FY2015URS CH2M Oak Ridge, LLC

Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) @ Savannah River

1,339 Q1FY2016Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc.

Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility (MOX) @ Savannah River

4,810 Q1FY2017Shaw AREVA MOX Services, LLC

Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) @ Hanford

12,263 Q1FY2019 Bechtel National Inc.

12

Under Construction (Post CD-3)

Critical Decision 3 – Approve Start of Construction

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11 13

Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) @ Hanford, WA

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11 14

WTP Construction

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11 15

Mixed Oxide Facility @ Savannah River Site, SC

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11 16

MOX Construction

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11 17

National Synchrotron Light Source II Site Plan

NSLS

CFN

NSLS-II

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11 18

NSLS II Construction

NSLS

NSLS II

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11 19

K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant Decontamination and Decommissioning

K-33K-31

K-25K-27

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11 20

K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant Decontamination and Decommissioning

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11 21

Thomas Jefferson Lab:12 GeV Upgrade Scope

Scope of the proposed project includes:- Doubling the accelerator beam energy- New experimental hall & beamline- Upgrades to existing 3 experimental halls

Upgrade is designed to build on existing facility: vast majority of accelerator and experimental equipment have continued use

CHL-2CHL-2

Upgrade Upgrade magnets and magnets and

power suppliespower supplies

Enhance capabilities in existing Halls

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11 22

Thomas Jefferson Lab:12 GeV Upgrade Site Area

Present Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF)

A B C

So

uth

Lin

ac

No

rth

Lin

ac

Injector

CHL-2

East Arc

West Arc

New Experimental Hall & Beamline

D

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11 23

Questions?

SAMESAME09/22/1109/22/11

CD-0Approve Mission

Need

CD-1Approve

Alternative Selectionand Cost

Range

CD-2Approve

Performance Baseline (PB)

CD-3Approve Start

of Construction or Execution

CD-4ApproveStart of

Operations or Project

Completion

CriticalDecision

RequestPED Funds

Independent Review(OECM EIR >$100M )

to Validate PB

OECM EIR for Major System

(>$750M) Projects

Projects Report Earned Value ≥ $20M

DefinitionInitiation Execution Closeout

PARS II Reporting for Projects ≥ $10M

Operating Funds

Operating Funds

PEDFunds

ConstructionFunds

TPC

Project Management Process“Acquisition Management System” with Critical Decision (CD) Milestones

24