Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel …1441677/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2020....
Transcript of Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel …1441677/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2020....
-
Social Sustainability in COVID-19
Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
Master Thesis, 15 ECTS
Master’s Programme in Sustainable Management
Department of Business Studies
Uppsala University, Campus Gotland
Academic Year 2019/2020
Authors: Beka Katsadze & Daniel Milojevic
Supervisor: Matilda Dahl
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
Acknowledgements
As the Visby Scholarship holder, I (Beka Katsadze) want to thank the Swedish Institute for giving
me such a great opportunity to study in Sweden, at Uppsala University and to gain tremendous
academic and personal experience. We both want to thank all our professors for the great courses
during the academic year and we especially want to express our gratitude to our supervisor, Matilda
Dahl, who all the time provided us with helpful feedback, self-confidence, and motivation. We
also want to thank our fellow classmates, who have always been supporting us during the whole
program. In addition, we would like to thank our families and friends for their endless support
during an intense year. And finally, we want to thank all the hotels and their managers that decided
to participate in our research regardless of their extremely busy schedules due to the crisis.
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
Abstract
The COVID-19 outbreak, travel restrictions, or other safety norms had a huge negative impact on
the world hotel industry from the beginning of 2020. In response to the crisis majority of the hotels
all around the world had decided to get closed temporarily. Such a deep crisis arose many social
problems especially among the employees of the industry. However, there were still cases, when
hotels decided to choose different strategies rather than closing their doors for their customers.
One of us had a great opportunity to spend 14 days of quarantine in one of such hotels and to
collect the valuable information from inside the hotel room, which had been converted into a
quarantine zone after the virus outbreak. Besides, we also explored several more cases from 4
different countries about the hotels that have chosen to create social benefits in different ways. In
this thesis, we have analyzed socially sustainable strategic solutions from the hotel industry,
explored characteristics, and described the circumstances that encouraged such solutions.
Key words: COVID-19, hotel industry, social sustainability, crisis management.
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Problem Formulation and the Research Question ............................................................................. 1
2. Theoretical Framework ......................................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Crisis Management Theory and the Tourism industry ........................................................................ 3
2.1.1 Pre-Crisis ...................................................................................................................................... 4
2.1.2 During the Crisis .......................................................................................................................... 4
2.1.3 Post-Crisis .................................................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Social Sustainability and the Hotel Industry ....................................................................................... 5
2.2.1 What is Social Sustainability? ...................................................................................................... 5
2.2.2 Social Sustainability in the Hotel Industry................................................................................... 6
3. Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 8
3.1 Research philosophy ........................................................................................................................... 8
3.2 Research design .................................................................................................................................. 8
3.3 Research strategy ................................................................................................................................ 9
3.4 Data collection .................................................................................................................................... 9
3.4.1 Interviews ..................................................................................................................................... 9
3.4.2 An Auto-ethnographic Study ..................................................................................................... 10
3.4.3 Secondary Data Collection ......................................................................................................... 10
3.5 Data analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 10
4. Empirical Studies ................................................................................................................................. 12
4.1 COVID-19 Pandemic and the World Hotel Industry .......................................................................... 12
4.2 Country Overview - Georgia .............................................................................................................. 12
4.3 Case 1 - Park Hotel Tsinandali, Georgia ............................................................................................ 13
After the Crisis......................................................................................................................................... 16
4.4 Case 2 - Sheraton Grand Tbilisi Metechi Palace, Georgia ................................................................. 16
4.5 Country Overview – UK ..................................................................................................................... 18
4.6 Case 3– Ten Hill Place Hotel, UK ....................................................................................................... 19
4.7 Case 4 – The Grange Hotel, UK ......................................................................................................... 21
4.8 Country Overview – Canada ............................................................................................................. 23
4.9 Case 5 – Burrard Hotel, Canada ........................................................................................................ 23
4.10 Country Overview – USA ................................................................................................................. 25
4.11 Case 6 - Wythe Hotel, USA .............................................................................................................. 26
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
5. Analyses .............................................................................................................................................. 28
Table 1. Strategic solutions and the influence on stakeholders ............................................................. 29
5.1 Pre-Crisis ........................................................................................................................................... 29
5.2 During the Crisis ................................................................................................................................ 30
5.3 Post-crisis .......................................................................................................................................... 33
6. Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................... 35
6.1 Research Limitations and Further Research ..................................................................................... 35
7. References .......................................................................................................................................... 37
8. Appendix ............................................................................................................................................. 42
8.1 Interview Questions .......................................................................................................................... 42
8.2 List of Interviews ............................................................................................................................... 44
8.3 Pictures: Hotels During the Pandemic .............................................................................................. 45
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
1
1. Introduction
During the first half of 2020, we are living in a different world. The world started to change from
Wuhan (one of the biggest industrial centers of China) in January 2020 when carbon and other
greenhouse gas emissions started to fall dramatically. The trend from China was soon followed by
the whole world, mainly Europe and the USA. Industrial activities and the use of transport were
greatly reduced all over the world and, as a result, the world’s total carbon emissions are expected
to fall by 4% during the year. However, the reduction is still not enough to reach the global 1.5°C
temperature limit but still might become the biggest fall in history (CarbonBrief, 2020).
If the above trends were a result of a successful predetermined policy against climate change
problems, they would constitute a promising starting point for a thesis research in sustainability
and the tourism industry. Unfortunately, all the above-mentioned positive environmental changes
were caused by the deadly COVID-19 virus, which began spreading in late 2019 from China. The
virus, which is often called coronavirus, was reported by the World Health Organization (WHO)
on December 31st, 2019. As of January 13th, WHO had already reported about the first virus case
detected outside of China. Already on January 23rd the Chinese Government made a decision to
lockdown Wuhan and a month later almost every country all over the world started to close their
borders as well. Countries started to announce a state of emergency and total lockdowns one after
another within their country territories (World Health Organization, 2020). Even though, as shown
above, the crisis caused some positive changes in environmental problems, restrictions on travel,
public gatherings, and economic activities ended up in an economic recession and increased social
problems (United Nations, 2020).
Now, at the beginning of May, I (one of the authors of the research) am staying in the quarantine
zone in Georgia (my home country), writing these lines and waiting for 14 more days to pass so
that I can finally go home. The quarantine zone is arranged in the Park Hotel Tsinandali and is
intended to host citizens of Georgia that enter the country from abroad. The hotel, which had been
hosting guests from around the world before the pandemic, has now changed its purpose
dramatically. Sitting at the table in my hotel room and observing the events from inside makes it
more obvious how different the world that we are living in today has become. Restrictions on
travel, recommendations against public gatherings and restrictions on many economic activities,
finally resulted in a huge economic recession, which according to the United Nations (2020) might
lead to a 1% world GDP reduction, instead of 2.5% planned growth. Obviously, the different
sectors were affected on a different scale by the crisis, but the tourism might be one of the most
affected among them. International travel and hotel occupancy levels declined dramatically during
March and April. As a result, international tourist arrivals are expected to fall by 20%-30%,
translating into a $300-$450 billion loss in 2020 (World Tourism Organization, 2020).
1.1 Problem Formulation and the Research Question
Unfortunately, statistical data, like reduction in revenue, often translates into social problems and
the crisis in the tourism industry is not also an exception. According to the World Travel and
Tourism Council (2020), almost one million jobs are lost daily in the travel and tourism industry
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
2
during the hardest period of the pandemic (late March and April). They estimate that up to 75
million jobs are at immediate risk, depending on the period of the pandemic and international
lockdown (World Travel & Tourism Council. 2020). At the same time, closing hotels not only
endangers the wellbeing of employees but also prevents the industry from creating welfare for
other stakeholders like their customers, local communities, and others. In response, we see many
cases from all over the world when different hotels try to find different solutions when instead of
closing their doors, they continue creating benefits for their various stakeholders. In this research,
we will dig into such stories from hotels and will try to find their socially sustainable strategic
solutions. Hence, our main focus will be to identify and analyze social sustainability in their
strategic solutions.
Nowadays there are different definitions of social sustainability, however, the main idea of the
concept is common and is related to creating the well-being of human beings. According to one
known definition by Harris and Neva: “The social dimension [of sustainability] may be defined as
progress toward enabling all human beings to satisfy their essential needs, to achieve a reasonable
level of comfort, to live lives of meaning and interest, and to share fairly in opportunities for health
and education.” (Harris & Neva, 2001, P 27). Besides, on the business level, Dillard et al. (2008)
emphasize the importance of stakeholder interactions as the social sustainability creation tool from
business organizations. Therefore, when talking about the social sustainability of hotels’ strategic
solutions, our focus will also be on their different stakeholders like employees, customers, or local
communities and the influence on their well-being.
When the world is fighting against the pandemic and industries, especially the hotel industry is
facing probably the biggest crisis they have ever experienced, now the problem of social
sustainability is probably more acute than ever before. Now, when hotels are striving to somehow
survive the crisis, how are they supposed to work with social sustainability issues? Is that even
possible? Thereby, our main research question is:
How do hotels manage the crisis caused by COVID-19 pandemic in a socially sustainable
way?
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
3
2. Theoretical Framework
Since we aim to analyze social sustainability in hotels’ strategic solutions during the COVID-19
crisis, we decided to base our research on two main theories: crisis management and social
sustainability theories. In this chapter, we will firstly introduce and discuss the crisis management
theory mainly related to the tourism industry. Based on the existing research we will discuss the
theory according to three main phases: pre-crisis, during the crisis, and post-crisis. Secondly, we
will introduce the concept of social sustainability and different theories related to social
sustainability and the hotel industry.
2.1 Crisis Management Theory and the Tourism industry
Crises are concomitant phenomena of the modern economy and business organizations face them
whether they are caused internally or externally (Ritchie, 2004). A crisis can create devastating
consequences for an organization and its stakeholders and it was defined by Bundy et al. as
follows: “an event perceived by managers and stakeholders as highly salient, unexpected, and
potentially disruptive—can threaten an organization’s goals and have profound implications for
its relationships with stakeholders” (Bundy et al., 2017, P1662). Such instabilities in the
organization, that are caused by crises may raise problems of the brand’s reputation, organizational
learning and adaptation, as well as the financial position and stakeholders' perception about the
organization (Bundy et al., 2017).
In the tourism industry crises raise from different reasons and except for internal sources, when
the crisis might be caused by internal organizational problems, many uncertainties in the modern
world also lead the tourism industry to crises triggered by various external sources like natural
disasters, terrorism and political instabilities, virus outbreaks, financial crises, and etc (Richter and
Waugh, 1986; Faulkner and Vikulov, 2001; de Sausmarez, 2003; Ritchie, 2004; Henderson, 2007).
From many other external sources, crises caused by disasters have been broader researched by
scholars of the tourism industry. However, such studies mostly highlight reactive responses and
recovery strategies rather than reduction or readiness strategies (Ritchie, 2004). Faulkner defined
the disaster in the tourism industry as follows: “where an enterprise (or collection of enterprises
in the case of a tourist destination) is confronted with sudden unpredictable catastrophic changes
over which it has little control” (Faulkner, 2001, P144) and developed tourism disaster
management framework with 6 main phases. However, in general, crisis management theory has
mostly been divided into three main phases: Pre-Crisis - Prevention & Preparation, The Crisis -
Response, Post-Crisis - Learning & Revision (Coombs and Laufer, 2018; Bundy et al., 2017).
Therefore, in this chapter, we will discuss the crisis management theory and the disaster
management framework, offered by Faulkner, chronologically based on the above-mentioned
division.
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
4
2.1.1 Pre-Crisis
The research on pre-crisis management, according to Bundy (2017), approach the topic of crisis
management from two main perspectives: internal and external perspectives. From the internal
perspective, scholars emphasize the importance of proper organizational systems and the decision-
making processes. Reliable and quick decisions are crucial when dealing with unexpected crisis
and system collapse. The major factors for an organization’s successful management of crisis are
the development of flexible and fast internal organizational systems, such as organizational
structure, culture, and making efforts to reduce the dysfunctional nature of the organization.
(Bundy et al., 2017). Since there is a high correlation between preparedness for the crisis and the
frequency of damage, he highlighted the importance of identifying the first signs of the crisis to
avoid a big impact. As for the external perspective, scholars argue that positive stakeholder
relationships are crucial for reducing the likelihood of a crisis. (Bundy et al., 2017).
Coombs (2007) suggests the Crisis Management Plan (CMP) as a tool of companies’ preparedness
for the upcoming crises. Such plans may differ depending on business sector or other
circumstances. However, according to Coombs, it should provide the organization with reminders,
predetermined messages, and other important functions. Except that, the tourism disaster
management framework from Faulkner (2001) also emphasizes the importance of preparedness.
In the initial stages of the crisis, the framework suggests organizations to develop crisis
management teams and crisis management strategies. According to Faulkner such strategies
should be based on potential disaster assessments, which enable the existence of different scenarios
in response to diverse possible challenges (Faulkner, 2001). However, already in 1995, Drabek
identified problems in the practical implications of Crisis Management Plans. He claimed that
CMPs in the tourism industry were mainly informal and undocumented and even more, they were
intended for a limited set of circumstances like hotel fires and etc. (Drabek, 1995). Thus, the
tourism industry faced the crisis caused by the SARS virus outbreak in 2002-2003 and the pre-
crisis management phase turned out to be much shorter than expected. The crisis management
started already with the following phases like containment and damage limitations. (Henderson,
2007).
2.1.2 During the Crisis
During the crisis management phase, scholars describe the flexibility of organizational structures
and the leadership skills of the managers as important internal factors for successful actions. James
et al. (2011, P 458) emphasize the importance of “crisis handlers”, leaders that take responsibility
to lead the organization during pre- and post- crisis periods. They discuss the characteristics of
leaders, like charisma, to be an important contributor for successful anti-crisis actions from the
organization. Besides, Dowell et al. (2011) suggest that more powerful CEOs increase the chances
of quicker decisions and therefore decrease the likelihood of the failure. According to Bundy:
“leaders who frame crises as threats react more emotionally and are more limited in their efforts,
while leaders who frame crises as opportunities are more open-minded and flexible” (Bundy et
al., 2017, P1671). However, the effort from the leader is not the only solution and independent,
small boards with quick decision-making processes are also the main contributors to the process
(Bundy et al., 2017). Besides, Coombs (2007) discusses internal communications and quick
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
5
information exchange processes to be crucial to make competent decisions and keep control of the
processes.
As for the external communications, the response of the organization to the crisis can be different,
but if we try to generally characterize it, we can use the definition from Bundy and Pfarrer:
“response strategies that accept less responsibility - generally labeled defensive - attempt to
[reduce] an organization’s perceived association with a crisis… [while] strategies that accept
more responsibility - generally labeled accommodative” (Bundy and Pfarrer, 2015, P352). Every
crisis has a negative influence on companies’ different stakeholders and the attempt from the
company to reduce, minimize the negative impact is a matter of reputation and responsibility
(Kellerman, 2006). Experimental studies by Coombs and Holladay (1996) and by Dean (2004)
have shown less damage to the reputation of the organizations that have expressed their
condolences compared to those who have avoided doing so (Coombs, 2007).
2.1.3 Post-Crisis
As for the post-crisis phase, the research mainly focusses on organizational learning and changes
in internal and external policies. Organizations should use the crises as the learning possibilities
and therefore develop crisis management strategies for future challenges (Bundy et al., 2017;
Coombs and Laufer, 2018). Paraskevas (2006) define the phase as a "clean-up" process when the
organization analyzes crisis management to evaluate strengths, shortcomings, and learnings from
the failures that will lead the company to updated and valuable knowledge.
Faulkner emphasizes two main phases related to the post-crisis period in the tourism disaster
management framework. In long-term recovery and resolution phases organizations focus on
counseling victims of the crisis and putting all necessary measures to ensure the recovery of the
crisis victims (Faulkner, 2001). The recovery process can be different based on many
circumstances related to specific organizations or tourism destinations in general. According to the
theory, Crises might affect developing countries more, with less diversity in economic sectors. The
likelihood of a deeper crisis increases when the country’s dependency on the tourism sector is
higher (Allen, 2003).
2.2 Social Sustainability and the Hotel Industry
2.2.1 What is Social Sustainability?
Sustainable development has been one of the driving forces of the world economy from the end of
the 20th century, caused by increasing awareness of the expected ecological crisis (Pisani, 2006).
The term of Sustainable development was defined by the United Nations as follows: “development
that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet
their own needs” (WCED, 1987, p43). The concept is commonly described by the triple bottom
line model, which on itself recognizes three main dimensions of sustainability. According to the
model sustainable development is achieved when all economic, environmental, and social goals
are fulfilled simultaneously (GRI, 2006).
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
6
Environmental and economic dimensions of sustainability have been recognized earlier, during
the second half of the 20th century, however social sustainability has gained broad popularity later,
only after 2000. Instead of only preserving natural capital or establishing economic stability, social
sustainability also encourages human happiness, equality, and well-being. Hence, human welfare
can be considered as a major difference between classical environmentalism, environmental
understanding of sustainability, and social sustainability (Caradonna, 2014). Social sustainability
is also quite significantly represented in United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals, such as:
no poverty, zero hunger, good health and well-being, quality education, gender equality, clean
water and sanitation, reduced inequalities, sustainable cities, and communities (UNDP, 2020).
2.2.2 Social Sustainability in the Hotel Industry
United Nations’ World Tourism Organization’s (2020) definition of sustainable tourism includes
all three main dimensions of sustainability and is described as: “Tourism that takes full account of
its current and future economic, social and environmental impacts, addressing the needs of
visitors, the industry, the environment, and host communities” (UNWTO, 2020). Here we will
focus more on the social dimension of sustainable tourism, which according to UNWTO refers to
respecting the socio-cultural authenticity of host communities, at the same time preserving the
tradition and cultural heritage. It also requires equal opportunities for the whole society and
equitable distribution of tourism benefits (UNWTO, 2020). However, when it comes to social
sustainability in the hotel industry, business scholars mainly stress the importance of different
stakeholders’ relations and hotels’ responsibility for their well-being (Jones et al., 2016).
Not only in the hotel industry but also generally in organizational studies stakeholder approach is
a common method for defining the social dimension of sustainability. According to Dillard et al.
(2008), social interactions are a core part of organizations and involve a diverse network of
participating and/or impacted stakeholders such as staff, suppliers, customers, and the community.
“Business organizations have a myriad of social impacts from their interaction with, inter alia,
employees, suppliers, communities, and consumers. These impacts vary depending on the nature
of the organization, its activities, and stakeholder interactions” (Dillard et al., 2008, P 159).
Dillard et al. (2008) emphasize the importance of secure employment contracts, fair working
conditions, and fair salaries for the employees. Organizations should also recognize their influence
on their local communities and should try to eliminate the negative concequences of the influence.
And finally, according to the theory companies have a responsibility toward their customers to
deliver safe products by using responsible marketing tools, giving them accurate information about
the product and the risks associated with its consumption (Dillard et al., 2008).
Stakeholder theory is also actively used in CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) theory and
practice. CSR, which is defined as follows: “the responsibility of enterprises for their impacts on
society” (European Commission, 2011, p.6) has gained high recognition and has been
progressively adopted by the hotel industry since the 1990s in order to demonstrate their
commitment to building sustainable tourism (Ayuso, 2007). CSR theory and practice acknowledge
and widely use stakeholder theory. A firm has a moral responsibility to its stakeholders, however
because of limitations, the choice needs to be made to the most important ones (Jamali,2008).
Exactly that is why companies have a choice to identify the most important stakeholders and use
their effort in accordance with their power and importance. Business scholars recognize diverse
stakeholders in the hotel industry; however, several main groups can be identified based on
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
7
different researches such as Government organizations, tourists (customers), public sector,
employees, competitors and etc. (Pavlovich, 2003; Ritchie and Crouch, 2003; Miller, 2001).
As we have already mentioned before, the sustainable business model implies the identification
and contribution to the company’s significant stakeholders, therefore the model suggested by
Porter and Kramer (2011) discusses the role of a business organization toward its stakeholders.
The model is known as “Creating Shared Value” (CSV). While CSR theory is often blamed to be
adopted by companies as more marketing tools than their real will to make a positive contribution
to society, CSV suggests social responsibility as a core value of the company. The aim of CSV is
to create a shared value during the entire value chain (Kramer and Porter, 2011).
In the offered model Porter & Kramer (2011) illustrate three main approaches for companies to
create shared value. (1) According to CSV, by reconceiving products and markets, companies
should shift their focus from only profit and profitable products to real demand of customers.
(Porter & Kramer, 2011). By utilizing natural resources and contributing pollution, companies
often have a negative effect on the ecosystem and society at the same time. (2) By redefining
productivity in the value chain Porter and Kramer (2011) show the business the method to build a
responsible value chain and minimize the negative influence on a company’s employees or on the
society. And finally, (3) By enabling local cluster development companies are able to help a local
society, increase their well-being and at the same time contribute to the knowledge exchange
(Porter & Kramer, 2011).
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
8
3. Methodology
In order to answer the research question, we chose the qualitative research method to collect the
empirical data and to analyze it in connection with the theoretical framework. We have chosen 6
different cases of the hotels from 4 different countries and explored social sustainability in their
strategic solutions against the COVID-19 crisis. We conducted one auto-ethnographic study and
six online semi-structured interviews with managers of each hotel, alongside with the secondary
data from online media articles, reports, and webpages.
3.1 Research philosophy
Since our research theories: social sustainability and crisis management theory, along with our
business cases are both very closely related to social science, we base our research on the
philosophy of interpretivism. The philosophy of interpretivism is based on the idea that subject
matter of social sciences such as humans and their institutions are totally different from the natural
sciences. Therefore, the reality is created by human action and meaning-making, rather than
existing objectivity like in natural sciences (Bell et al., 2018).
When describing sociology, Weber stated: “[Sociology is a] science which attempts the
interpretive understanding of social action in order to arrive at a causal explanation of its course
and effects” (Weber, 1947, P 88). Lincoln and Guba also try to explain the interpretivism of social
action and discuss that there are no single realities in our surroundings which can be understood
in the same way by everyone at the same time. They believe in the existence of multiple realities,
which are socially constructed (Lincoln & Guba, 1986). Hence, we assume that our research can
also be influenced by our subjectivity. The research subject and research results are shaped by
objective facts and conclusions, but also by our point of view, beliefs, and values.
3.2 Research design
Our purpose of the research is to find and explore different socially sustainable strategic solutions
from the hotel industry. So, we chose comparative design as the main research design of our work.
The comparative design entails the study using two or more contrasting cases. It is based on the
idea that social phenomena can be understood better when it is described by comparing several
different but still interrelated cases (Bell et al., 2018). In order to explore the influence of the
existing COVID-19 crisis on the hotel industry and their social sustainable strategic solutions, we
decided to research several different cases from different parts of the world. Even though the hotel
industry faces almost the same crisis all over the world, strategic approaches from various hotels
are different from each other. Therefore, we decided to use cross country comparison as a tool to
explain different approaches and decisions from various hotels.
To choose the cases for empirical studies we applied purposive sampling, which implies that the
sampling should be conducted with reference to the goals of the research (Bell et al., 2018).
Therefore, we first of all identified hotels from all over the world based on the main selection
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
9
criterion: hotels that we would use in the research should have chosen different strategies, rather
than closing their doors and waiting for the situation to change positively, they should have chosen
the strategy which would have any positive impact on the society. We intensively researched
online media articles and identified almost 45 different hotels from 13 different countries. The
cases were mainly about hotels, that converted into hospitals, quarantine zones, or the hotels that
offered free stays to different parts of the society. We sent the collaboration offer to every such
hotel and as a result, we received positive feedback from 5 hotels and proceed with further research
for these cases. The hotels, which we have researched were Sheraton Grand Tbilisi Metechi Palace
from Georgia, Ten Hill Place Hotel and Grange Hotel from the United Kingdom, Burrard Hotel
from Canada, and Wythe Hotel from the USA. As for the sixth case from Georgia, Park Hotel, it
was the hotel, where one of the authors of the research had been sent by the Georgian Government
for two weeks quarantine. So, we chose the last case based on the personal experience, however,
the hotel met every selection criterion that we had used before.
3.3 Research strategy
We chose to use a qualitative research method as a main research strategy for the thesis. The main
difference of the qualitative research method from the quantitative method is that it is concerned
with words and images rather than with numbers. Besides, the qualitative method is characterized
by interpretivism, since it tries to understand the social world with its interpretations (Bell et al.,
2018). In our research, we used a combination of several qualitative methods for data collection
including ethnography, qualitative interviews, and secondary data collection.
There are commonly recognized three main research strategies for reasoning: Deductive method
is used to test the existing theory, as for inductive method - the research is used to develop a theory,
while the newest approach called abductive method is a combination of above-mentioned two
approaches and is used to explore a phenomenon (Suddaby, 2006). We chose the abductive method
for reasoning the thesis since it involves back-and-forth engagement with empirical data and
theoretical understanding (Schwartz-Shea & Yanow, 2012).
3.4 Data collection
3.4.1 Interviews
We chose the approach of online semi-structured interviews as one of our data collection method
and we conducted one interview for each case. The hotels, that we chose to communicate with are
located in different parts of the world and online interviews seemed to be the only adequate method
to collect the diverse information. Synchronous online interviews were conducted by using modern
digital technologies, which gives us the opportunity to make a video or audio calls and therefore
receive the information in real-time with an increased possibility of interactions (Bell et al., 2018).
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
10
As a result, Zoom and Google Hangouts interviews turned out to be the most preferred method
based on our and our respondents’ preferences. Interviews were based on the previously created
interview guide, which we mainly created using our research question and the theoretical
framework (See in the appendix, chapter 8.1). Since our questions were mostly related to
companies’ anti-crisis strategic solutions and other major decisions, we decided to conduct
interviews with hotels’ CEOs, General Managers, or other leading positions (See the list of the
interviews in appendix, chapter 8.2).
3.4.2 An Auto-ethnographic Study
Since one of us (Beka Katsadze) was spent to a mandatory quarantine for 14 days in the local hotel,
in Georgia, we were given an incredible opportunity to conduct participant observation studies
there. The hotel was converted into a quarantine zone and actively collaborated with the
government in order to provide social benefits to its different stakeholders. Thus, we decided not
to waste such an opportunity and use the quarantine period to gather valuable information from
inside the hotel. We were able to gather information about all important procedures and details
that we would not be able to understand from other sources and what is the most important we
were given a chance to get an emotional connection to the processes. By experiencing living in the
quarantine zone, we gained the understanding of the customer, one of the key stakeholders,
perspective of the processes. During 14 days of the quarantine, Beka wrote a diary, where he
included his story starting from traveling from Sweden, ended with the last day of the quarantine.
He put his impressions, observations, and emotions on the paper, which we later used as the
empirical data.
3.4.3 Secondary Data Collection
The collection of secondary data has mainly been done electronically via databases available in
Uppsala University's library and Google Scholar. Besides, we also actively used press articles and
information from official organizations’ webpages. As for the books that have been used as
secondary sources, they have been found in the Almedals Library. The secondary data found in
the library or online scientific articles, helped us to develop the understanding of the term of social
sustainability, its perceptions on the organizational level, and the theory of crisis management.
Except for the theoretical part, we also actively used secondary data in our empirical studies. We
were actively involved in online media coverings of the topic related to the pandemic and
especially in the context of hotels and the tourism industry. Besides, we explored webpages and
reports of different international or local organizations, we used webpages of the hotels from our
cases in order to access important general or statistical information (Check the pictures in
appendix, chapter 8.3).
3.5 Data analysis
The thematic analysis method has been chosen for our data analysis. Our interviews have been
recorded via audio recording and later have been transcribed verbatim. The sound recordings have
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
11
been re-listened and other written materials have also been re-read and re-analyzed several times
to ensure that the contents of the data are correctly interpreted. We used the Crisis Management
and Social Sustainability theories as a theoretical framework to help us analyze the empirical data,
gathered from different sources. In order to explain the differences between the theory and the
empirical research, later the work was divided into three different parts based on three main stages
of the crisis: pre-crisis, during the crisis, and post-crisis phases. By combining and comparing the
data gathered from different cases we identified commons and differences between diverse
strategic approaches, which helped us to answer the main research question (Bell et al., 2018).
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
12
4. Empirical Studies
In this chapter, we will introduce six different cases about hotels from four different countries. In
each case, we will discuss the strategic solutions of the hotels against the COVID-19 crisis. The
information will be presented into three main phases: pre-, during and post-crisis. We will try to
highlight social sustainability in each such case, but before that, we will start with the general
overview of the pandemic and its influence on the hotel industry.
4.1 COVID-19 Pandemic and the World Hotel Industry
On December 31st, the World Health Organization (WHO) in China published a report that would
later affect the entire world and its economy (World Health Organization, 2020). Soon the virus
started to spread worldwide and the rapid spread of the (later known as) COVID-19 virus has
forced countries to respond by declaring social distancing, lockdowns and other measures. Closed
companies rising unemployment level and reduced consumption have devastating consequences
for the global economy (Bank of England, 2020). The business that can be worst affected by the
pandemic is a tourism industry, which generates just over 10% of global GDP and creates every
fourth job produced in the world (WTTC, 2020). According to UNWTO (2020), the industry
already experienced a 57% fall by March, equivalent to loss of 67 million arrivals and 80 billion
dollars in revenue. The consequences of the pandemic have the potential to eliminate between 100
- 120 million jobs related to the tourism industry, depending on how the situation changes during
the year (WTTC, 2020).
4.2 Country Overview - Georgia
Measures against COVID-19 were implemented in Georgia earlier even before the first confirmed
case was detected in as late as the 26th of February. However, restrictions started to become even
more strict afterward. Already from the March 18th the country closed its borders for non-Georgian
citizens and started to put everyone arriving in the country into two weeks mandatory quarantines
(NCDC, 2020).
The tourism industry is one of the main priorities of Georgian economic strategy during the last
several years and is also one of the fast-growing industries in the country. After the COVID-19
outbreak and all the measures from Georgian Government, the tourism industry was not able to
continue functioning anymore, however, 83 hotels all around the country were given an
opportunity to be converted into quarantine zones and host people having the necessity to be
isolated (Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia, 2020). The government
supporting package consists of different action including postponing taxes of next four months,
paying 80% of 6 months interest rates of hotels’ bank loans and supporting workers that lost their
jobs from the industry by 200 Georgian Laris (approximately $65) monthly payments during 6
months (similar to other sectors of the economy). The government plans to open up the industry
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
13
for internal travelers already from the June 15th, as for international travelers - from the July 1st
(Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia, 2020).
4.3 Case 1 - Park Hotel Tsinandali, Georgia
Before the Crisis
The Park Hotel Tsinandali is a new hotel located in the historical region of Kakheti, Georgia. The
hotel opened in 2019 and is owned by Silk Road Group, one of the biggest investors in Georgia.
Since the Park Hotel is located in the small village of Tsinandali, it is one of the biggest employers
of the village (Everyone in the hotel’s staff is local, except for the part of top management) and is
actively involved in developing Tsinandali as a sustainable tourist destination.
Already from the beginning of March the hotel already faced massive booking cancelations and
radically reduced new bookings due to the beginning of the pandemic. The signs of a huge
upcoming crisis were already apparent. By this time the company did not have any predetermined
crisis management plan or manuals related to crises caused by pandemics. In these circumstances
the importance of quick decisions was vital to adapt to the situation, explains the hotel sales manager.
The Crisis
The Park hotel quickly managed to adjust to new circumstances and implemented major changes
for that. As soon as the Government of Georgia started to impose restrictions against the virus
outbreak, the Park Hotel was contacted by the Tourism Administration of Georgia offering to
convert the hotel into a quarantine zone to accommodate people with a high risk of spreading the
virus. “It’s not the situation when you think about benefits to be honest, because it is a very hard
time obviously for the country and for everyone, and you need to make some sacrifices.” (Kipiani,
2020) –explained the hotel’s sales manager the process of making the decision. The Tourism
Administration offered the hotel the payment for bookings, obviously, the rate was much less than
in a normal situation, but it was still enough to provide essential services to customers and to
maintain 100% of the employees. So, the management team quickly made a decision, and already
on March 15th Park Hotel was prepared to accommodate first guests.
The execution of the decision was not as easy as the decision on itself and the hotel worked a lot
to adapt its infrastructure and procedures to new circumstances. Park Hotel received detailed
guidelines and procedures from the tourism administration and executed all necessary changes in
order to provide the safety of the staff and the guests at the same time. As a result, the hotel already
received first guests from one of the international flights that landed in Georgia on March 17th.
After more than one month the coauthor of our research, Beka Katsadze was also taken to the Park
Hotel for 2 weeks quarantine after he traveled back home from Sweden.
Georgian government used to arrange several special flights per week from European cities in
order to bring Georgian citizens back to their country. Our coauthor was also brought back to his
country by one of such flights from Copenhagen, Denmark, with almost 50 other citizens. After
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
14
the special flight arrived in the Tbilisi International Airport, all the passengers were checked for
fewer and everyone without virus symptoms were taken to the hotel according to special
guidelines.
“The situation looked very different from what I’ve seen before in Sweden or in Denmark,
everyone looked very mobilized trying to follow quite strict guidelines. Airport terminal
looked empty and scary just like in Copenhagen, but the difference was that procedures
were very strict and controlled by the police or airport staff, everyone was wearing masks,
face protecting glasses, or full PPE (personal protective equipment). […] After that, they
divided us into two busses and sent us to the hotel. I heard from someone that the hotel was
called Park Hotel… I’ve never heard about it, quickly checked it on Booking.com, looked
good. The bus was led by a police car, we stopped just once on the way and were not
allowed to do it again. Everything felt so creepy!” (Katsadze, 2020, fieldnotes).
The situation looks different in the hotel even from the beginning of the check-in procedure. Guests
are requested to make a line outside of a hotel entrance with 2 meters distance from each other.
Each guest gets disinfected by the hotel’s worker and after that, one after another, they are able to
enter the lobby. Every worker wears masks and gloves and tries to keep a social distance from the
guests and from each other. Guests approach the desk and stay on the distance from receptionists,
who start the check-in procedure.
“First of all, the receptionist asked for my personal information like my name and
telephone number, he also asked if I had any allergies and any preferences with food and
after receiving all the answers asked me to choose one of the room keys from the table.
[…] I quickly grabbed the key and the receptionist quickly explained the “basic rules”:
- After you enter your room you are not allowed to leave it for 2 weeks. There are
cameras in the corridor and they are controlled by the security staff. Food will be
served three times per day on the table in front of your door at 9 am, 2 pm and 7 pm.
There are garbage packs in the room and you can put the bag with garbage outside of
your room every day after 10 pm. If you have any questions the number of reception is
written on your card and you can call us at any time. If you want to buy anything from
the grocery you can transfer money on our account and we will try to provide anything
as soon as possible.
Everything was clear, I went to the corridor. Young man, covered with full PPE introduce
himself:
- I am your doctor and I will be here during your stay, here is my number and you can
call me at any time if you need it. Here is also the number of psychologists and you can
also contact them any time you need. There is a thermometer in your room and we will
provide you with paper blanks every day. I want you to measure your body temperature
twice a day: at 10 o’clock in the morning and at 9 o’clock in the evening, write down
the numbers on the paper and put it on the table near the door outside of your room. I
will come and see you every evening.
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
15
After that, I already went to my room on the first floor, at the end of the corridor. […] “you
are not allowed to leave”, “there are cameras”, checking body temperature twice a day,
everything seemed to be like I had expected to happen, but realizing that it is already a
reality and it is happening to me was shocking.” (Katsadze, 2020, fieldnotes).
Rooms in the Park hotel are arranged in almost the same way as in the usual situation; however,
guests still find some things that are not very usual for high-class hotel rooms. Rooms of 26 square
meters are equipped with double or twin beds, TVs, small wardrobes, comfortable bathrooms, and
balconies, with the view of the amazing nature of the Tsinandali Park. However, since the guest is
responsible for cleaning the room for 14 days, there are also brooms, chemicals for cleaning the
toilet, washing powder for clothes, full packages of toothpaste, and packs for garbage. The staff is
always equipped with protecting equipment and never have direct contact with their guests.
Providing the service mainly takes place with the help of small tables in front of every room. The
food, which is cooked in the hotel’s kitchen is delivered to the tables three times a day, and guests
are able to pick them any time after the delivery. In order to follow safety standards foods are
delivered with single-use tableware, which is thrown into the garbage each time after the use.
Doctors have daily contact with hotel guests, they check the health conditions and provide guests
with any kind of necessary treatment. Hotel corridors are disinfected by the hotel’s staff twice a
day with special equipment. The room service has also been changed due to the quarantine and the
hotel staff deliver any kind of products that the guest needs on their serving tables, guests are able
to transfer money on the hotel’s account to purchase anything from the grocery store.
When people are sent to 14 days obligatory quarantine, even if they spend these days in 4- or 5-
star luxury hotels they are still torn from the outside world and such experience might have an
influence on their mental and emotional health conditions. But how can such acts be perceived
from their guests? Are hotels helpful with their contributions?
“The most difficult thing in the quarantine is that every day looks like each other. You
never know what day it is today, what you did two days ago, or what your plans are for the
next days. It is shocking to see beautiful weather outside, to have the door open but still
not being allowed to leave We often take things for granted, just several days ago I was
walking on the beach with my friends in Visby, Sweden, but now I’m locked here in the
room and I’m dreaming of just being able to go outside. However, it does not matter how
bored I feel now, I still totally understand the necessity of such measures. As a student, I
had quite an active lifestyle and had communication with a lot of international students. I
am young and healthy, but now I’m back home, where I have my father who has just
performed the operation, or my grandmother who is already above 70 and I realize that
having the opportunity to stay in a quarantine zone for two weeks is the only way to be sure
that I will not harm my family. I’m very grateful that I’m able to spend this period in a
comfortable hotel room, where I have almost all the necessary comfort that one can have
being locked in the room. If I had to stay in quarantine, a high-class hotel room would be
the best place for it” (Katsadze, 2020, fieldnotes)
New reality is difficult not only for guests but is also very challenging for the staff of the hotel.
Besides every safety norm, working at such place can be perceived as risky and scary. But as the
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
16
hotel’s sales manager told us they discussed the possible decision with every member of the staff,
giving them options to continue working in new circumstances or to refuse the government offer.
Finally, every employee decided to be a part of it and now 100% of the staff is working in the hotel
with full payments.
The participation of the whole staff was also crucial in the hotel’s main decisions. The
communication between the management team and the staff was constant and mainly based on 24
hours of online interactions. As the sales manager of the hotel revealed in the interview, the whole
team actively participated in the decision-making process and the final decision was made only
after the confirmation from each member of the staff. “It’s not just about you and me […] it’s
about us being a team […] and us being all together in this” (Kipiani, 2020). – explained he later.
Finally, a low level of bureaucracy and flexibility was factors that made the decision-making
process quick enough to make and execute difficult and important decisions.
After the Crisis
The state of emergency was finished on May 22nd in Georgia and based on success in fighting with
the virus more and more restrictions are expected to be removed soon. Even though the borders
will already be open from July for international travelers the company still does not expect big
numbers of guests from abroad and as the Post-COVID strategy, they have chosen to concentrate
on the local market from the beginning. Since the hotel already has the experience to operate in a
period of pandemics their knowledge to handle new safety norms, might be important gaining for
their future plans as well. In the country, which was mainly dependent on international tourism, a
massive reduction in international travel might have a huge impact on the economy, especially in
the hotel industry. The question is when people will start traveling again. Perhaps not very soon:
“We already arrived at Copenhagen Airport early in the morning. […] The airport which
impressed me with its huge size, a lot of shops, a huge crowd rushing to different directions
and which impressed me with the high temp of life during the flight last Christmas, now
looked like a post-apocalyptic place. Empty car parking, empty terminals with just several
travelers walking around with masks and scared eyes, airport staff with tired and bored
faces everything this made me even more depressed. […] After seeing this I just wonder
how the airport and the world will look like after the pandemic. When will we start
traveling again or will we start it at all?” (Katsadze, 2020, fieldnotes).
4.4 Case 2 - Sheraton Grand Tbilisi Metechi Palace, Georgia
Before the Crisis
Sheraton Grand Tbilisi Metechi Palace is a luxury hotel in the center of Tbilisi, the capital of
Georgia. The hotel has become a victim of the deadly COVID-19 virus as almost every other hotel
all over the world. Even though the influence of the crisis on the business, especially in the hotel
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
17
industry was huge in Georgia, the management team of Sheraton Tbilisi tried to do their best to
keep the focus on the social contribution as before the crisis.
The general manager of Sheraton Tbilisi Hotel mentioned in the interview that customers,
employees, and the local community has always been one of the main focus of their decisions. As
he described, the hotel has never been closed since it was opened in 1991 and since then has been
a place of “hope” during wars and all difficult times that the capital city of Georgia has
experienced in the 1990s and even later. As part of the worldwide chain of Sheraton Hotels and
Resorts, social responsibility is also the topic of big importance for Sheraton Tbilisi. Their strategy
is to create a maximum career or personal development opportunities for the employees, to offer
the highest quality service to the customers and to contribute to the well-being of the local society.
However, the crisis, that endangered majority of hotels turned out to be a huge challenge for
Sheraton as well.
The Crisis
As the general manager stated in the interview, they saw the first signs of the crisis already in
January, resulting in reduced bookings and booking cancelations. But as he explained the hotel did
not have any crisis management plans regarding to virus outbreaks. “Every company has manuals
[for a crisis], crisis plans in place, but for this format? -No. You have manuals for illnesses, for a
breakout of viruses, but there are no manuals for closing down the hotel, which we needed to do”
(Smits, 2020). After a total reduction of customer demand and then after starting the government
restrictions, closing down the hotel seemed to be the only existing solution for Sheraton Tbilisi
Hotel. But the hotel managed to find a different solution which could contribute to society during
such a difficult period.
Instead of closing down the hotel, similar to the Park Hotel, Sheraton Grand Tbilisi Metechi Palace
decided to give the hotel rooms to the Government of Georgia to arrange free quarantine zones for
people who have a necessity to be isolated from the society. However, in this case the hotel refused
to receive any compensation and provided the government with free hotel rooms. “[We had] two
options, to leave the hotel empty while knowing what’s happening around us, or you say: Let’s
step in, let’s assist the government. […] We wanted to do something back to the community”
(Smits, 2020) – The general manager explained the decision during the interview. As he later
extended, the easiest decision for them would be to close the hotel until the crisis is over and reopen
it later. However, the team could not escape the responsibility that they felt toward the community
and employees. Finally, almost 200 rooms became occupied by people, who are sent to the
quarantine and the hotel provides them with safe isolation, three meals per day and all necessary
comforts.
Except for the impact on the community, Sheraton Hotel also needed to make important decisions
related to its employees. After reaching almost zero income level during the crisis, companies,
including Sheraton Tbilisi faced the necessity of reducing operating costs. Making decisions about
layoffs might be difficult everywhere, in every condition, however, local governments’ supporting
programs sometimes can reduce the pressure on the company. Though, it was not a case in a
developing country like Georgia. The general manager told us: “We are operating in a country,
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
18
where […] if there is a crisis or you need to make decisions, there is no social system in place if
people lose their jobs” (Smits, 2020). So, the company managed to maintain everyone from local
employees and layoffs affected only the staff from abroad. As a result, the company managed to
sustain more than 90% of the employees.
Decisions on board were made on a team basis with the active participation of the staff members.
“With a group that we had leftover, we agreed and it was a mutual agreement with people on
board that everybody [from the board] would go on 50% pay cut and […] the staff would go on
40% pay-cut” (Smits, 2020) – explained the general manager the difficult decision about the
reduction of staff salaries. Since the safety of the employees and their family members is a big
priority of the hotel, all of them were given the option to continue working in different conditions
or to stay home if they would like to. “The biggest thing that I see in the staff is that it [existing
situation] gives [them] a very good spirit, a team spirit […] nobody has been forced to do this, all
are on a voluntary basis” (Smits, 2020). The majority of the workers decided to be a part of the
unique experience and to contribute their part to help society. After starting to serve the quarantine
customers hotel workers also are able to stay at the hotel not to put their family members in danger.
They also have proper training on how to safely deal with the quarantine and are equipped
properly.
After the Crisis
The Sheraton Hotel management team expects positive changes in the economy already from June
when the Georgian Government will probably start to soften some restrictions. The main strategic
focus of the company will be the local market in a near future and they will focus on the
international visitors only after the international travel industry starts recovering, which according
to management’s expectations might take much longer. Even though expectations for the coming
summer season is not high, the general manager hopes that learning outcomes from the crisis will
be significant. Decision-making is expected to become more linear, remote and efficient, like it is
now, during the crisis. As he mentioned in the interview, internal and external online
communication has become much more efficient than in many cases during a face to face
communication. And finally, the decision-making process is also quicker and more result-oriented.
4.5 Country Overview – UK
On January 31st, 2020, the first COVID-19 (Corona) case was confirmed in the United Kingdom.
Since that date, the number of Corona-infected patients has increased exponentially (BBC News,
2020; Statista, 2020). The UK government has recommended people to isolate themselves at
homes as much as possible. The government strongly advised the population to avoid any kind of
unnecessary travel and people were allowed to leave their houses mostly only for purchasing
essential products (GOV.UK, 2020).
Because of the crisis related to the COVID-19 pandemic, many companies needed to lay off their
employees. In such a case, Government support schemes are in place and employers are able to
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
19
receive support from the government through the 'Job Retention Scheme,' which helps to cover 80
percent of staff salaries, and covers a salary of up to £2500 per month (GOV.UK, 2020). Besides
employees, government support was in place for companies as well. Financial aids for companies
vary depending on the size of the company and the amount varies between £ 10,000 and £ 25,000
per property (GOV.UK, 2020). According to the Bank of England (2020), the hotel and food
industry was the biggest loser in the pandemic, with an estimated average decline of about 80
percent, compared to a 60 percent decline in the second-most affected construction and retail
sector.
4.6 Case 3– Ten Hill Place Hotel, UK
Ten Hill Place Hotel is a 129 bed 4-star hotel located in the center of Edinburgh city, Scotland.
The hotel opened in 2006 and is owned by the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh. Even
though Ten Hill Place Hotel is a part of the Best Western Premium Collection chain, the hotel is
branded independently.
Before the Crisis
The hotel openly declares its strategy to establish green tourism practices and therefore
implemented different projects related to water consumption reduction or plastic bottle elimination
in the rooms. Since the hotel is owned by the surgeon’s college and is also located next to its main
building, its social contributions are also quite often related to medicine and different health issues.
Ten Hill Place is actively involved in the project with its partners to help improve bowel cancer
surgery.
The hotel and its management team had a disaster crisis management experience from the 2010
volcano eruption in Iceland, when the natural disaster caused enormous disruption to air travel in
Europe. The management team faced the problems caused by a lack of international tourists and
decided to offer free stays to international travelers staying in airports after hundreds of flights
were delayed. However, the hotel did not have any crisis management plan or manuals in place,
especially related to pandemics. In the interview the managing director talked about the different
characteristics of different crises and emphasized the importance of quick decisions from
experienced management teams and not predetermined general guidelines: “every situation is
different, and that’s why you have employees and experienced management team who have gone
through situations before […] In my near 30 years of hotel experience now, each crisis situation
[…] has been different from the one before” (Mitchell, 2020).
The Crisis
Things looked normal for the hotel before the second part of March 2020 when the government
first time advised UK citizens to avoid public gatherings. As a result, the hotel did not have any
guests or bookings in the near future and the management team had to make a quick decision. The
board in the hotel consists of 7 members and therefore decision-making process has always been
quick without major complications. Because of that, the company turned out to be flexible during
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
20
the crisis, having no problem to make difficult decisions quickly, without hesitation. They finally
decided to use the property to offer medical and other key workers free stays in the hotel. The
managing director explained their decision and the purpose of the decision in the interview:
“People in a medical workforce were having to work longer shifts, they had concerns at
that time about going home and passing the virus on to family members or vulnerable
people. Once we saw that we made an instant decision […] we would open our doors and
give our facilities free of charge, because that helps people stay safe and stay out work,
that ultimately helps not just individuals but the rest of the society by keeping as many
actively working at the medical workforce as possible.” (Mitchell, 2020).
The initiative was soon welcomed by the society and numbers of front-line workers willing to use
the opportunity to rest in the Ten Hill Place Hotel had been increasing daily. However, remaining
the hotel open during the pandemic and ensuring the well-being of customers, employees or other
stakeholders demanded huge changes in business processes and safety standards. “Almost in every
aspect of how the hotel operates, we now had to reinvent the way to be as safe as possible”
(Mitchell, 2020) - mentioned the managing director. The hotel from Edinburgh offered its guests
not only free stays in the hotel rooms, but also free breakfast and dinner, giving medical workers
the chance to rest and have social interactions after tiring and exhausting days from their
workplaces. However, breakfasts, dinners, and communications in the hotel restaurant could not
be the same as it was before the pandemic. The main concern of the guests during the pandemic
changed from maximum comfort to maximum safety. So, the tables in the restaurant have been
relocated separately from each other and only one person is allowed to sit at each of them. Besides,
changes were also made in many small details of different procedures of the hotel to promote social
distancing. The number of guests who are not willing to leave their rooms is increasing, which in
itself increases the demand for room service.
Things also did not remain unchanged for 150 workers of the Ten Hill Place Hotel. Due to the
decreased number of guests, only a small part of the staff continued working on site after the
beginning of the pandemic. Employees had an option to temporarily stay at homes if they preferred
so and, in this case, they were involved in the government support scheme which provides them
80% of their initial salary. However, employees who continued working received 100% of their
salaries from the hotel. The only part of the employees, who voluntarily agreed to reduce their
salaries by 20% and 50% were the hotel management team and the general manager. The hotel
also provides its workers with all recommended personal protective equipment (PPE) to ensure
the safety of the staff and the guests at the same time. Employees are also advised not to use public
transport, though, if necessary, the hotel also provides them with free and comfortable stays at the
property between the shifts.
One of the key factors, that influenced the hotel’s strategic solutions during the crisis, was quick,
flexible decision-making, with a high level of team participation. “We can react quicker than most
of the medium or large size companies, we can decide something in the morning and act in the
afternoon” (Mitchell, 2020) – explained by the managing director. However, the quick decision-
making process did not encourage autocratic decisions and the role of the teamwork played a big
role during the crisis. The managing director revealed: “My mechanic [of the decision-making]
would be discussing [the issue] with the senior management team about what we think collectively
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
21
is right. It’s not an autocratic business […] if five of my senior managers are saying A and I am
thinking B – well, we’ll go with A, because that’s the collective decision” (Mitchell, 2020).
After the Crisis
The Ten Hill Place Hotel expects things to change positively soon, but the difficulties in the hotel
industry are expected to last longer. The hotel does not expect to host international travelers during
the initial period of post-pandemic time. That is why they focus their near future strategic goals on
internal travelers from the UK. Thus, they already started to work on 2 projects which will be
implemented in the near future. Edinburgh Staycation will be standard 2-3 hotel packages for
guests from the surroundings of Edinburgh and the second option called Edinburgh Keyworker
Staycation will be the same package for keyworkers with a special discount.
The hotel industry will be different after the pandemic than it was before and Ten Hill Place Hotel
already started working on how to adapt the hotel to a new reality. They have already started
working on new procedures to organize safe events with social distancing, to serve customers in
the restaurant in compliance with all safety standards and etc. The managing director of the hotel
introduced us some specific solutions that the hotel is already working on such as serving
restaurant customers with single-use food boxes and organizing events by using many small tables
located at a distance. The company also plans to let administrative staff work 50% of their working
hours remotely, which would contribute to the well-being of employees and at the same time would
have a positive impact on the environment. Regardless of existing strategic plans and hopes, the
hotel still expects financially difficult several months or even years. The question is how the
company can support all its employees after the government’s supporting program is over.
4.7 Case 4 – The Grange Hotel, UK
The Grange Hotel is a small, family-owned 18-beds hotel with a small restaurant. It is part of Best
Western Hotels and is located in a small village of Oborne, Dorset County, England. The hotel is
actively engaged in the local community and is involved in many local cultural and other kinds of
activities. Besides, it is a significant employer of the village since 23 workers of the hotel out of
total 24 are locals.
Before the Crisis
According to the hotel’s general manager, the influence of the upcoming COVID-19 pandemic on
the Grange Hotel was already clear from the second half of February when they faced the situation
that demanded radical and difficult decisions from them. However, before the crisis, the company
did not have any predetermined crisis management plan for virus outbreaks. The general manager
told us that they have manuals for extreme situations like electricity cut-offs, though the company
had not determined risks related to virus outbreaks before. He also revealed that none of the hotels
he had been communicating with during the crisis had expected the pandemic of such a big scale.
“I contacted with maybe 150 hotels… some of them had a crisis management plan, [however] they
had nothing to do with this level of [pandemic]” (Fletcher, 2020) – he added later.
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
22
The Crisis
The crisis had a huge impact on the hotel’s occupancy level from the beginning, which resulted in
financial problems and put the management team in a difficult situation. Closing down the hotel
seemed to be the only choice for them if not the offer from Best Western to convert the hotel into
a hospital. The grange hotel confirmed their interest to Best Western to become a hospital already
in February, but they made a final decision when the Dorset Council informed them about the need
for new hospital beds at the beginning of April. As the hotel’s manager explained the decision was
not difficult to make, first of all, because of their intension to make their part of the contribution
to society in such a difficult situation and, secondly, because of financial problems in the hotel.
“We didn’t really see the way that we were going to survive six months of being closed” (Fletcher,
2020) – told us the general manager.
Finally, the hotel signed a 3 months contract with local authorities and was reopened on April 13th.
According to the plan the Grange Hotel is supposed to serve symptom free COVID-19 infected
patients or other patients who are not infected by the virus but still require medical treatment due
to other health issues. The hotel and the whole region were lucky enough not to have necessity to
use the property by the time when we had an interview with the hotel’s manager (beginning of
May), though the hotel passed through all the procedures and is fully prepared to serve patients
when it becomes necessary.
As the hotel’s manager revealed the process of change was not easy and involved changes in many
directions: “The trouble is that, because it hasn’t been done before, nobody knew [what to do]”
(Fletcher, 2020). Changes were required in staff, physical equipment, procedures, safety norms,
and in many other directions. First of all, the hotel needed to purchase all the necessary equipment
like sanitizers, cleaning chemicals, personal protective equipment and etc. which were necessary
for their new reality. Secondly, they have totally changed the hotel procedures. After the
transformation hotel staff started to work in collaboration with medical workers. Doctors and
nurses took over responsibilities to treat and communicate with patients, while hotel’s staff are not
able to interact with patients or to enter their rooms. Cleaning of rooms had become the
responsibility of medical workers, as for the service, hotel staff provides patients with food and
other necessary items by leaving them on the table in the corridor without having any contact with
their guests.
The hotel’s decisions were broadly communicated through many channels internally and
externally. The General Manager introduced his new strategy to society from national television.
At the same time, they had open communication with the local community to ensure that any kind
of misunderstandings would be eliminated. The communication has also been important in
between the hotel’s staff and in times of social distancing online communication tools played a
significant role in the process. However, not everyone from employees stayed on-site in such an
unusual situation. Since the employees were provided with financial help from the government’s
social programs the Grange Hotel staff were given options to stay home and participate in
government schemes or to continue working in the changed working conditions. All the workers,
that decided to continue working were given training about sanitizing and other safety issues from
professionals, so they are fully equipped and prepared to handle the challenge. As a result, 8
workers out of 24 are right now on-site and waiting for the first patients. Since the hotel is family-
owned and has a very small number of employees, decisions were made quickly and with the
-
Katsadze & Milojevic- Social Sustainability in COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of the Hotel Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
23
participation of the staff members. As the result, the hotel managed to be flexible in the decision-
making process which resulted in their strategic solutions.
After the Crisis
The General Manager of the Grange Hotel expects that customer behavior might be changed for
an even longer period than the period of government restrictions. After the end of 3 months period
of being a hospital, the Grange Hotel expect it to be possible to reopen again as a hotel already
from September. Though, since the expectations about occupancy level are quite low especially
from the beginning, the hotel’s management team still doubts about the financial expediency of
remaining open. However, if the hotel opens in Septembe