Social Psychology: Introduction: Lecture1
-
Upload
james-neill -
Category
Technology
-
view
28.124 -
download
7
Transcript of Social Psychology: Introduction: Lecture1
7125/6666 Social Psychology - Lecture 1: Introduction, Sem 2, 2007
Social Psychology
Lecture 1, Week 1
Introduction
Semester 2, 2008
Lecturer: James Neill
Image source: Unknown
21 July, 2008, 11:30-13:30, 2B11
7125-6666 Social Psychology / G
Centre for Applied Psyhology
Faculty of Health
University of Canberra
Bruce, ACT 2601, Australia
ph: +61 2 6201 2536
http://wilderdom.com/7125
http://wilderdom.com/6666
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Unit+Outline
Overview
Unit outline
Introduction
What is social psychology?
History
Research
Culture & nature
Unit outline
Image source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Drukstation_Social_psychology.jpg
Contact info
Before/after lectures
6201 2536
Drop-in tuts: Wed 13.30-14.30 (after lecture) in 3C18 (computer lab).
Or by appointment
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Contactshttp://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Drop-in+Tutorials
Description
Theory
Research
Applications
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Lectures
Learning outcomes
Key concepts
Apply theories
Communicate
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Learning+Outcomes
Lectures (10 x 2 hr)
9 by James Neill
(W 1, 2, 3, 4 10, 11,
12, 13, 15)
1 by Melisah Feeney
(W 5)
http://www.canberra.edu.au/directory/index.cfm?action=staffdetail&staffid=613374http://www.canberra.edu.au/directory/index.cfm?action=staffdetail&staffid=422823
Lectures
Streamed live
Video & audio downloadable
Notes ~24 hours prior
Readings mostly from textbook
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Lectures
Lecture themes
Foundations
Problems
Strategies/Solutions
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Lectures
Lecture themes
What?
What can go wrong?
What can go right?
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Lectures
Lecture topics
01. Introduction
02. The Social Self
03. Social Thinking
04. Aggression (DVD)
05. Prejudice
06. Relationships
07. Groups
08. Prosocial
09. Environmental
10. Review
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Lectures
Tutorials
6 x 2 hr
Alternate tuesdays after lecture (check timetable)
Tutor:
James Neill (all)
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Tutorials
Tutorial topics
01. Introduction
02. Communication
03. Prejudice and aggression
04. Cross-cultural training
01. Australian zeitgeist
06. Assessment workshop
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Tutorials
Tutorial themes
Experiential exercises
Audio / video
Discussion
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Tutorials
Drop-in
After lectures
3B32 / 3C18
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Tutorials
Assessment
35% Essay
35% Exam
25% E-portfolio
05% Research participation
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Assessment
Essays
3000 word max:
Theory (33.3%)
Research (33.3%)
Written expression (33.3%)
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Blogs
Essay topics
Choice of topics discussed in the first tutorial
Each student adopts a unique/topic question
By the beginning of W3, all topics will be posted
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Blog+1
Extensions
are
unlikely
(see Outline)
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Blog+2
E-portfolio
Set up a Wikiversity account
Submit name of account to convener
Create some initial reflections for W1 and 2
Look at and comment on other user-pages
These are examples only. For more info, seehttp://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Online+engagement
Exam
During exam-period
Open book
Multiple-choice
Lectures
Tutorials
Readings
ThomsonNOW quizzes
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Contactshttp://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Drop-in+Tutorials
Textbook
Social Psychology and Human Nature
Baumeister & Bushman (2008)
Image source: Publisher
Textbook access
Bundle (~AU$130)
iChapters (~US$60)
ThomsonNOW (~AU$40)
Library
Companion site
Textbook foci
Self
Evolutionary
Cultural
Textbook themes
Food
Sex
Tradeoffs
Bad vs. Good
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Textbook
Unit themes
Cross-cultural
Australia
Social technology
Experiential
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Textbook
e-Reserve
Alt. chapters
Classic articles
Cross-cultural readings
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125/Textbook
Websites
ucspace
http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/7125
Wikiversity
http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/SPP
Click to add notes
What is Social Psychology?
Image: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c2/Ideology_Icon.png
Human behaviour
in social context.
Many more definitions can be found at http://www.wilderdom.com/psychology/social/definitions.html
How the
thoughts
feelings
behaviours
of individuals
are influenced by the...
Thoughts (cognition)Feelings (affect)Behaviours
Many more definitions can be found at http://www.wilderdom.com/psychology/social/definitions.html
actual
imagined or
implied
presence of others
(based on Allport, 1935)
Many more definitions can be found at http://www.wilderdom.com/psychology/social/definitions.html
Image source: Unknown
If you visited the Australian War Memorial at night, and you were alone
How would you feel?
What would you think?
What would you do?
Why would you have these reactions?
In this example, there is no real presence of others, but there is an implied presence. This is a place where others (defence forces and civilians both alive and dead) are remembered and actively imagined. It is a place where people gather and learn about the history of Australia in armed conflict and peacekeeping. The AWM is visited by thousands of people a day, from Australia and overseas. Although one may visit alone, ones thoughts, feelings, and behaviour are very likely to reflect the implied presence of others and normative expectations. Note, people with different cultural orientations may react differently e.g., consider possible reactions by a German, an Iraqi, an Australian Vietnam veteran, and an Aboriginal person.
Photo credit: http://www.awm.gov.au/virtualtour/building.htm
a joint function of
personal and
situational
influences
(based on Baumeister & Bushman, 2008, p. 11)
Many more definitions can be found at http://www.wilderdom.com/psychology/social/definitions.html
feelings
(Affect)
behaviours (Behaviour)
thoughts
(Cognition)
ABC
Person to Person
Image source: Unknown
e.g., love (thoughts, feelings, and behavior)
Group to Person
Person to Group
Image source: Unknown
e.g., conformity; leadership
Group to Group
Image source: Unknown
e.g., racism
e.g., sociometrics
Sociometrics
A family of 4 involves:
6 dyads
3 triads
1 quadad
Image source: Unknown
These 3 domains interact and overlap with each other.
Social perception is interpretation of the social world.
Social influence is the ways in which the social world influences our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors.
Social interaction is the dynamic way in which individuals and groups communicate and interact.
Sociology vs.
Social Psychology
Sociology
(group)
SocialPsychology
Psychology
(individual)
The boundary between sociology and social psychology is indistinct
Social psychology is more often focused on the individual as the unit of analysis, whereas Sociology is more often focused on groups as the unit of analysis.
Social psychology has become more popular in recent decades, whereas Sociology has become less popular.
3 broad domains
Social perception
Social influence
Social interaction
These 3 domains interact and overlap with each other.
Social perception is interpretation of the social world.
Social influence is the ways in which the social world influences our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors.
Social interaction is the dynamic way in which individuals and groups communicate and interact.
Social perception
How we interpret social objects.
Image source: Unknown
Social influence
Attitudes & behaviour brought about by others.
Image source: Unknown
Change in attitudes and behaviour is brought about by (actual, implied, or imagined) others.
e.g.,
authority
seduction
negotiation
Social interaction
How we interact with others in the social world.
Image source: Unknown
How we interact with others in the social world e.g.,
Aggression
co-operation
Helping
Relationships etc.
Person vs. situation
PersonSituatione.g., racism person or situation?e.g., Consider the actions of Lynndie England at the Abu Ghraib prison. Do her actions reflect something about her? Something about the situation she was in? Some combination of the two? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynndie_EnglandImage: Self-drawn, public domain
Applications
Business
Health
Education
Law
Environment
These 3 domains interact and overlap with each other.
Social perception is interpretation of the social world.
Social influence is the ways in which the social world influences our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors.
Social interaction is the dynamic way in which individuals and groups communicate and interact.
Social Psychology & Some Close Scientific Neighbors
DevelopmentalPsycho-
pathology
Health
Organizational
History & Research
in
Social Psychology
Image: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Bandeau_portail_psychologie.jpg
Origins
Origins in Europe & North America in the late 19th -
early 20th
century.
Volkerpsychologie
(folk psych)
mid-late 1800s
Image source: UnknownVolkerpsychologie study of collective mind in Germany in mid- to late 1800s.Predecessor to cultural psychology.A forgotten approach to studying people bound by common language, myth and customs.http://cap.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/10/1/85
Crowd Psychology (Group Mind)
(Le Bon, 1895)
Image source: UnknownVolkerpsychologie led to concept of group mind which influenced study in the early 20th century on crowd behaviour (e.g. Le Bon crowd becomes subject to control of group mind & therefore often behaves badly).Le Bon's 1895 The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind influenced many 20th century figures, including Adolf Hitler, whose Mein Kampf insisted on Le Bon's work.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowd_psychology
History
First social psychological experiment
- Triplett (1898)
- Social facilitation
Triplett observed that cyclists go faster when racing against others or in front of a crowd.
Triplett's competition machine, with fishing reels A and B.His experiment children wound twine onto reels, either alone or in the company of another child performing the same task. Times were faster in the presence of another -> social facilitation.Images are in the public domain (from The Psychology Wiki).
History
Influences in Early 20th Century
Gordon Allport (Attitudes)
Post WW1 - rise of behaviourism & experimentation
Post WW1 social psychology splits from general psychology.Attitude scaling (1930s) social psychologists were interested in studying mental constructs, like attitudes, and not simply behaviour.Gordon Allports influence was in the observations regarding attitude (Chapter 7)
History
Attitude scaling (Thurstone, 1930s)
Social psychology splits from behaviorism and psychoanalysis
Post WW1 social psychology splits from general psychology.Attitude scaling (1930s) social psychologists were interested in studying mental constructs, like attitudes, and not simply behaviour.Behaviorism theoretical approach that seeks to explain behavior in terms of learning principles, without reference to inner states, thoughts, or feelings.Freudian psychoanalysis theoretical approach that seeks to explain behavior by looking at the deep unconscious forces inside the person.
Gestalt theorists - Asch, Sherif, Lewin (1930s-50s)
Studied group processes & dynamics
History
Gestalt theorists (30s, 40s, 50s) interested in studying individuals in groups, believed that the group was more than/great than the sum of its parts. e.g., Sherifs studies on norm formation, Aschs studies on conformity.Kurt Lewins influence was on the function of the person and the situation.
Post WW2 - motivated to explain atrocities committed e.g.,
Authoritarian personality (Allport),
Obedience (Milgram),
Roles (Zimbardo).
History
Much of social psychology was developed to explain war, especially the attempted genocide of WW2 social psychology is a product of social context e.g., studies by Milgram (obedience) and Zimbardo (roles).
1960s - rise of attribution theory, cognitive dissonance (Festinger)
Developments in European social psychology
Tajfel (social identity theory)
Moscovici (minority influence)
History
Attribution theory explaining our own behaviour & that of others increasing emphasis on cognitions.European social psychology more focussed on the role of the group social identity & social influence (minorities).
Late 1960s - early 1970s - crisis in social psychology
1970s to now - rise of social cognition & information processing
Alternatives - social constructionism, discourse analysis
Australian social psychology? Society of Australasian Social Psychologists (SASP)
History
Crisis questioned the methods of social psychology (more on this to come).1970s experimental methods, study of schemas, categorization, biases, heuristics etc.Non-experimental alternatives e.g., discourse analysis.Australia:SASP 250+ members, annual conference.Research draws on influences from both North America & Europe.Topics studied prejudice. stereotyping, culture, attitudes, groups, applied topics health, organisations, sport etc
Theory Research
TheoryResearch
Image source: Self-created, public domain
Scientific research method
State problem
Formulate testable hypothesis
Design study and collect data
Test the hypothesis with data
Communicate study results
Research method
Scientific methods distinguished psychology during the 20th century.
Experimental method flourished within social psychology 1930s-1970s.
Caused a debate/crisis that over-reliance on experimental research was limiting understanding.
Research methods
Experimental vs. non-experimental methods
Quantitative vs. qualitative methods
Scientific Method start with observations -> theory -> hypothesis -> research -> feeds back into theory.
Methods used in social psychology often depend on the research question.
Experimental method
Manipulate one or more variables (IV) & look at effect on other variable(s) (DVs)
Laboratory vs.
Field Experiments.
Manipulate IV(s), measure DV while controlling for extraneous variables.Still the most popular method used in social psychology.
Laboratory experiments
Advantages
Controlled environment so that causality can be inferred.
Internal validity
Internal validity - results obtained due to manipulation of IV.
Potential problems
Construct validity
External validity / mundane realism
Experimental realism
Reactivity
Laboratory experiments
Construct validity - do IV & DV correspond to theoretical constructs being investigated? e.g., does measure of aggression used in lab really measure true aggression?
External validity / mundane realism - generalisable to real world, similarity between experiment & real world. External validity is often low in lab experiments.
Experimental realism - the extent to which study participants get so caught up in the procedures that they forget they are in an experiment.
Reactivity - behaviour changes because part of experiment. e.g., Hawthorne effect workers who knew they were being observed improved/changed in terms of motivation & productivity.
Experiments are in themselves a particular social context which elicit particular types of responses from participants.
Good experiments (well-designed) should be high on internal validity & experimental realism.
Potential problems
Subject effects
Demand characteristics
Experimenter effects
Ethics?
Laboratory experiments
Subject effects - participants act in ways to please experimenter e.g., social desirability.Demand characteristics - experiment demands a certain response can be lessened by the use of deception in experiments.Experimenter effects - experimenter gives clues to hypothesis -> use double-blind design Subject effects, demand characteristics & experimenter effects can all be a threat to construct validity (i.e., not measuring what it intended to be measured).Ethics experiments tend to be less ethical than other types of research methods e.g., often involve deception.
Field experiments
Naturalistic settings
+ mundane realism
(- reactive)
control over potentially confounding variables
Measurement difficulties
Informed consent?
Field experiments can still manipulate an IV and measure its effect on a DV.
e.g., Sherifs summer camp studies.
Internal validity can be threatened because of the lack of experimental control.
Measurement cant give people self-report measures, mainly restricted to observational measures. How do we measure concepts like emotions in this type of experiment?
Ethical issues participants dont know they are in an experiment therefore cant get their informed consent.
e.g., field experiment looking at helping behaviour people of varying attractiveness or of different races approach people to ask for help.
Non-experimental methods
Archival research
Case study
Survey research - usually correlational
Observational field studies - observe behaviour in natural setting
Often use these methods when it is impossible to perform an experiment.
Archival research e.g., look at media reports & how they change over time this type of data may be biased.
Survey research e.g., look at the relationship between attitudes & intentions to behave a certain way.
Observational field studies e.g., observe aggression in childrens play this type of research tends to be less reactive.
Advantages
more naturalistic
may be more ethical
potentially large amounts of data
better construct validity
Non-experimental methods
Advantages:
more mundane realism/external validity
better construct validity because often less artificial plus the use of multiple measures.
Disadvantages
lack of control - less internal validity
may not show causality
researcher bias
demand characteristics
subject effects.
Non-experimental methods
Disadvantages:
cant infer causality because of lack of control.
demand characteristics e.g., wording effects in surveys.
subject effects may guess the purpose of a survey, may have social desirability effects.
Non-experimental methods tend to be used more when doing applied research.
Experimental methods are used more when doing pure or basic research.
Developed by Kurt Lewin (1940s)
Systematic, dynamic experiments with real groups
Pioneered action research
Action research
Developed by Kurt Lewin (1940s), who is known as the father of social psychology
Lewin conducted systematic, dynamic experiments with real groups
Pioneered action research, in which what is learnt is applied again, within the experiment, in a cyclical, dynamic fashion
Advantages
Relatively natural
Ethical
Empowering
Research is combined with education
Action research
Disadvantages
Lack of scientific control
Researcher-dependent?
Action research
Research ethics
Informed consent
Protect participants from harm & discomfort
Avoid excessive use of deception
Confidentiality
Fully debrief participants
Use of deception common in social psychology experiments because of the need to decrease reactivity & demand characteristics.
e.g.s of ethically dubious experiments:
Milgrams studies of obedience
Zimbardos prison study.
Why are ethics often a problem for social psychology experiments?
often controversial subject matter e.g., aggression, prejudice, conflict etc.
Often need for use of deception to reduce reactivity & social desirability effects.
The crisis
2 major criticism of social psychology (late 1960s):
Overly reductionist
Overly positivistic
Experimental method criticisms:
demand characteristics,
experimenter effects,
lack of social context.
1960s/70s social psychology was dominated by experimental methods.
Reductionism
Reducing behaviour to the individual, ignoring social context
Levels of explanation
intrapersonal
interpersonal or situational
positional
ideological
Reductionism e.g. studying stereotyping in the lab by looking at individual cognitive processes.
Levels of explanation (Doise)
intrapersonal individual
interpersonal between individuals within a given society
positional takes a/c of some factors outside the situation e.g., status, identity
ideological consider social relations between groups.
Level of explanation must match the question being asked.
Positivism
Non-critical acceptance of science and its methods
Is the scientific method & especially the experiment suitable for social psychology?
Positivism is a philosophy that states that the only authentic knowledge is scientific knowledge, and that such knowledge can only come from positive affirmation of theories through strict scientific method......positivism was first systematically theorized by Comte, who saw the scientific method as replacing metaphysics in the history of thought, and who observed the circular dependence of theory and observation in science.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positivism
But, is science just another religion (belief system) with limited avenues of inquiry.
And is objectivity possible?
Kenneth Gergen (1978, 1997)
Are experiments an appropriate research method for social psychology?
Social constructionism
Social events are:
Culturally embedded
Sequentially embedded
Openly competitive
Final common pathways
Complexly determined
Social psychology as history.
Social constructionism
Social psychology experiments dis-embed events from the cultural context e.g., body language, spitting.
Experiments only consider very short sequences of events so are they appropriate for explaining phenomena like attraction?
In the real world, a no. of stimuli compete isolated in the lab.
Multiply determined naturally confound each other.
Difficult to manipulate greater than 3 IVs in the lab.
Meanings change over time e.g., racism/language change from negroes/coloured to Black to African Americans (back to Black?)
Interpretation of the meaning of events & behaviour change across cultural history.
-> no general laws of behaviour.
-> all reasonable hypotheses are likely to be valid.
Social constructionism
Social psychology as history.
All hypotheses contain some truth for some persons at some time.
A major focus of social constructionism is to uncover the ways in which individuals and groups participate in the creation of their perceived social reality. It involves looking at the ways social phenomena are created, institutionalized, and made into tradition by humans. Socially constructed reality is seen as an ongoing, dynamic process; reality is re-produced by people acting on their interpretations and their knowledge of it.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_constructionism
Social world is product of socially & historically situated practices.
Research findings do not have meaning until interpreted.
No knowledge is transhistorical & transcultural.
Social constructionism
Importance of reflexivity - researchers awareness of own biases, assumptions etc.
Critical social psychology - value-laden & political.
Social constructionism
Research methods - focus on language & use of rhetoric.
Observations, interviews, records of naturally occurring events
Analysis of discourse
Social constructionism
Conclusions
Which research method is best?
Is the experiment still useful?
Methodological pluralism?
Both methods have advantages and disadvantages.The experiment is still the most popular & widely used method but with greater attempts to improve external validity & mundane realism.
Summary
A central subject in psychology which evolved as a unique field during the 20th century.
Summary
Large, dynamic, diverse field of inquiry, with many:
Theoretical & research approaches
Topics & applications
Debates & dilemmas
Summary
Social psychology studies the individual within the group (or society)
Culture & nature
Image: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Paget_Holmes_Yellow_Face_child.jpg
Overview
Psyche
Evolution
Culture
Social brain theory
Individual vs. culture
Psyche
Broad term for mind, influenced by:
Nature Genes, hormones, brain structure and other innate processes dictate how you will choose and act
Culture Learned experiences; from parents, society and any experiences
Psyche - Broad term for mind, encompassing emotions, desires, perceptions, and all other psychological processes.
Evolution
Theory of evolution
Natural selection
Survival
Mutation
Reproduction
Theory of evolution
Focus on how change occurs in nature
Natural selection
Process of selection of traits that will endure; while others disappear
Survival until reproduction
Reproduction
Survival living longer
Survival of the fittest
Competition within species
Mutation
a new gene or combination of genes
Reproduction
producing babies that survive long enough to also reproduce
Image: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Human_evolution_scheme.png
Z o o m
Once upon a time ....
Big Bang
14 billion years ago
30 billion trillion stars
14 billion light years
(3x10) stars within 14 billion light yearsStar maps from http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com
250 000 trillion stars
250 000 trillion stars
1 billion light years
200 trillion stars
100 million light years
1 billion light years
700 billion stars
500 000 light years
225 billion stars
200 billion stars
500 000 light years
600 million stars
5 000 light years
260 000 stars
250 light years
33 stars
12.5 light years
This series of pictures is from:http://www.rense.com/general72/size.htm
4.57 billion years ago...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth
Uni of Canberra
http://www.solarviews.com/raw/earth/bluemarblewest.jpg
~4 million years agohomo sapiens
(a bipedal hominid)evolved
Human evolution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Human.svg
Social nature CommunicateForm groupsSocial norms
(culture)
Humans
Humans
Social by natureUtilising systems of communication for self-expression, the exchange of ideas, and organizationCreate complex social structures- cooperating and competing groups- from small families and partnerships to species-wide political, scientific and economic unionsWide variety of traditions, rituals, ethics, values, social norms, and laws which form the basis of human society. Humans also have a marked appreciation for beauty and aesthetics which, combined with the human desire for self-expression, has led to cultural innovations such as art, literature and music.
Desire to understand and influence the world around themSeeking to explain and manipulate natural phenomena through science, philosophy, mythology and religion.This natural curiosity has led to the development of advanced tools and skillsOnly known species to build fires, cook their food, clothe themselves, and use numerous other technologies.
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human
100 billion ever6.6 billion now~10 billion by 2050
Humans on earth
5 born /sec
2 die /sec
Humans on earth
Source unknown
Population bottleneck
Image: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Views_on_Evolution.svg
Population density
World population density c. 2005Source unknown
21 million (.3%)
http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/rp/1999-2000/2000RP09-01.GIFFewer than 15% of Australians live in rural areas (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia) 17/07/2007
Human evolution survey
Image: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Views_on_Evolution.svg
Culture
Info-based system
Shared ideas
Common ways of doing things
Ideas
Mental (abstract) representations
Can be expressed in language
Consider cultural differences and underlying similarities
Social animal
Seek connections to others
Work together
Learn from one another
Help kin
Resolve conflict with aggression
Social Animal seek connections to others
Includes humans, but also many other animals
Cultural Animal evolution shaped human psyche to enable humans to create and take part in culture
Defining trait of what makes us human
Cultural animal
Evolution shaped psyche to enable creating and taking part in culture
Division of labor
Deliberately share knowledge
Help strangers
Resolve conflict with many alternatives
Social brain theory
Why is the human brain so evolved?
Larger brain is linked to complex social systems (Dunbar, 1993, 1996)
Advantages of culture
Human brain evolved to capitalise on culture
Language
Progress - to build on experience of others
Division of Labor
Exchange of Goods and Services
Humans have evolved to participate in culture
The duplex mind
Automatic system
Outside of consciousness
Simple operations
Conscious system
Complex operations
Changing role of consciousness
Increased focus on role of automatic system
Can learn, think, choose and respond
Has idea and emotions
Knows self and other people
Consciousness focus on complex thinking and logic
Living in a culture
Working to gain social acceptance
Inner states help humans connect to others
Intelligent brain evolved to improve interpersonal relations
Nature says go,
Culture says no
Nature impulses, wishes, automatic responses
Culture teaches self-control and restraint
Exceptions
Natures disgust reactions (No)
Cultural timetable for meals (Go)
Selfish impulse vs. social conscience
Nature makes us selfish
Preservation of self
Culture helps us resist selfish impulses
Consideration of what is best for society
Moral Code
Laws
Putting people first
People get most of what they need from other people
Culture as a general store of information
People look to each other first
What makes us human?
Behavior results from mix of nature and culture
Human life is enmeshed in culture
Humans think with language and meaning
Human life is enmeshed in culture
Diverse but share common themes
Creates unique problems
Is shared from generation to generation
Open Office Impress
This presentation was made using Open Office Impress.
Free and open source software.
http://www.openoffice.org/product/impress.html
Title text format
Click to edit the outline text format
Second Outline Level
Third Outline Level
Fourth Outline Level
Fifth Outline Level
Sixth Outline Level
Seventh Outline Level
Eighth Outline Level
Ninth Outline Level