Social psychology

69
Bell Work • What do you think social psychology entails?

Transcript of Social psychology

Page 1: Social psychology

Bell Work

• What do you think social psychology entails?

Page 2: Social psychology

Social Psychology

Studying the way people relate to others.

Attitude AttractionAggression

Group Behavior

Page 3: Social psychology

Attitudes• A set of beliefs and

feelings that predisposes one to respond in a particular way to something.

• Advertising is ALL based on attitude formation.

• Mere Exposure Effect• Central Route v.

Peripheral Route

Page 4: Social psychology

Do our attitudes guide our actions?

Only if….• External pressure is minimal.• We are aware of our attitudes. • The attitude is relevant to the behavior.

Page 5: Social psychology

More often, our actions affect our attitudes.

Page 6: Social psychology

Attitudes

Page 7: Social psychology

Attitude and Behavior

• Do attitudes tell us about someone’s behavior?

• LaPiere’s StudyCognitive Dissonance

Theory• People want to have

consistent attitudes and behaviors….when they are not they experience dissonance (unpleasant tension).

• Usually they will change their attitude.

You have a belief that cheating on tests is bad.

But you cheat on a test!!!

The teacher was really bad so in that class it is OK.

Page 8: Social psychology
Page 9: Social psychology

Bell Work

• Which occurs most often: our actions affect our attitudes or our attitudes affect our actions?

Page 10: Social psychology

Compliance Strategies

• Foot-in-the-door phenomenon

• Door-in-the-face phenomenon

• Norms of reciprocity

Page 11: Social psychology

Foot-in-the-door phenomenon

• The tendency for people who have first agreed to a small request to comply later with a larger request.If I give out an answer on a quiz,

what happens next?

Page 12: Social psychology

Door-in-face Phenomenon

• The tendency for people who say no to a huge request, to comply with a smaller one.

If I ask my wife for the 1952 Topps Mantle card ($15k) she will say? NO

But she may let me buy a new playstation game.

Page 13: Social psychology

Social Thinking

How do we think about one another?

Page 14: Social psychology

Attribution Theory

• Tries to explain how people determine the cause of the behavior they observe.

It is either a….• Situational Attribution• Dispositional AttributionAnd • Stable Attribution• When people infer that an event or behavior

is due to unchanging, permanent factors. This theory is heavily based on outcomes both positive and negative. Some of the things that influence this pattern are as simple as luck and effort level.

• Unstable Attribution

they infer that an event or behavior is due to unstable, temporary factors.

• False Consensus• Self-Serving Bias

Page 15: Social psychology
Page 16: Social psychology

Fundamental Attribution Error• We tend to

overestimate the role of dispositional factors.

Individualistic V. Collectivistic Cultures

False Consensus Effect

Self-Serving Bias

How do you view your teacher’s behavior?

You probably attribute it to their personality rather than their profession.

But do you really know?When you start a

romance, you assume that they agree with your world views….honeymoon period.

If you win it is because you are awesome…if you lose, it must have been the coach or weather or….

Page 17: Social psychology

The Effects of Attribution

• Social Effects• Political

Effects• Workplace

Effects

Page 18: Social psychology

Stereotypes, Prejudice and Discrimination

Stereotype:• Overgeneralized idea

about a group of people.

Prejudice:• Undeserved (usually

negative) attitude towards a group of people. Ethnocentrism is an example of a prejudice.

Discrimination:• An action based on a

prejudice.

Page 19: Social psychology

Prejudice

• An unjustifiable attitude towards a group of people.

• Usually involves stereotyped beliefs (a generalized belief about a group of people).

Overt

Subtle

Page 20: Social psychology

Prejudice Over Time

Page 21: Social psychology

Does perception change with race?

Page 22: Social psychology

Bell Work

• Why is there prejudice?

Page 23: Social psychology

Why is their prejudice?• Categorization• Vivid Cases (Availability Heuristic)

• The Just-World Phenomenon

Just world Phenomenon• In one popular study female and male subjects were

told two versions of a story about an interaction between a woman and a man. Both variations were exactly the same, except at the very end the man raped the woman in one and in the other he proposed marriage.

• In both conditions, both female and male subjects viewed the woman's (identical) actions as inevitably leading to the (very different) results.

In-Group versus Out-Groups.

• In-Group Bias

Scapegoat Theory

Page 24: Social psychology

Scapegoat Theory• The theory

that prejudice provides an outlet for anger by providing someone to blame.

Page 25: Social psychology

Social Inequalities(A principle reason behind

prejudice)• Ingroup: “us”- people

with whom one shares a common identity.

• Outgroup: “them”- those perceived as different than one’s ingroup.

• Ingroup bias: the tendency to favor one’s own group.

Page 26: Social psychology

Combating PrejudiceContact Theory• Contact between hostile groups will reduce

animosity if they are made to work towards a superordinate goal.

• Serif camp study• Election of Obama?

Page 27: Social psychology

Sherif’s Robbers Cave Experiments• Sherif is equally famous for the Robbers Cave Experiments. This series of

experiments, begun in Connecticut and concluded in Oklahoma, took boys from intact middle-class families, who were carefully screened to be psychologically normal, delivered them to a summer camp setting (with researchers doubling as counsellors) and created social groups that came into conflict with each other. These studies had three phases: (1) Group formation, in which the members of groups got to know each others, social norms developed, leadership and structure emerged, (2) Group conflict, in which the now-formed groups came into contact with each other, competing in games and challenges, and competing for control of territory, and (3) Conflict resolution, where Sherif and colleagues tried various means of reducing the animosity and low-level violence between the groups. It is in the Robbers Cave experiments that Sherif showed that superordinate goals (goals so large that it requires more than one group to achieve the goal) reduced conflict significantly more effectively than other strategies (e.g., communication, contact).

Page 28: Social psychology

Prejudices can often lead to a….

Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

• A prediction that causes itself to be true.

• Rosenthal and Jacobson’s “Pygmalion in the Classroom” experiment.

Page 29: Social psychology

Aggression: Any physical or verbal behavior intended to hurt or

destroy.In the U.S. we are MUCH

more likely to be murdered compared to most other developed

nations.

Page 30: Social psychology

Psychology of Aggression

Two types of aggression1.Instrumental

Aggression2.Hostile Aggression

Theories of Aggression:Bandura’s ModelingFrustration-

Aggression Hypothesis

Page 31: Social psychology

The Biology of Aggression

• Genetics• Neural

Influences (is aggression in the brain)

• Biochemical

Page 32: Social psychology

The Psychology of Aggression

Frustration-Aggressive Principle:

• the blocking of an attempt to achieve some goal

• Creates anger which generates aggression.

Goals can be:

•Sports or work

•Relationship

•Body Condition etc…

Page 33: Social psychology

Hot Weather and Aggression

Page 34: Social psychology

Can we learn to be aggressive or gentle?

They can be learned but….Once learned they are difficult to

change.

Page 35: Social psychology

Aggression and TV

Watches =

• By the time you are 18, you spend more time in front of TV than in school

•2/3 of all homes have 3 or more sets average 51 hours a week.

•By the time a child finishes elementary school they have witnessed 8000 murders and 100,000 other acts of violence on TV

•Over half of all deaths do NOT show the victim's pain

•As TV watching has grown exponentially, as does violent behavior- a strong positive correlation.

•How do you think TV has affected sexual aggression?

Page 36: Social psychology

Prosocial Behavior

• Kitty Genovese case in Kew Gardens NY.

Bystander Effect:• Conditions in which people

are more or less likely to help one another. In general…the more people around…the less chance of help….because of…

• Diffusion of Responsibility

Pluralistic Ignorance• People decide what to do by

looking to others.

Page 37: Social psychology

Attraction

5 Factors of Attraction

Page 38: Social psychology

Proximity

• Geographic nearness

Mere exposure effect:

• Repeated exposure to something breeds liking.

• Taiwanese Letters

Page 39: Social psychology

Reciprocal Liking

• You are more likely to like someone who likes you.

• Why?• Except in

elementary school!!!!

Page 40: Social psychology

Similarity

• Paula Abdul was wrong- opposites do NOT attract.

• Birds of the same feather do flock together.

• Similarity breeds content.

Page 41: Social psychology

Liking through Association• Classical

Conditioning can play a part in attraction.

• I love Theo’s Wings. If I see the same waitress every time I go there, I may begin to associate that waitress with the good feelings I get from Theo's.

Page 42: Social psychology

Physical Attractiveness

Page 43: Social psychology

The Hotty Factor

• Physically attractiveness predicts dating frequency (they date more).

• They are perceived as healthier, happier, more honest and successful than less attractive counterparts.

Page 44: Social psychology

Beauty and Culture

Obesity is so revered among Mauritania's white Moor Arab population that the young girls are sometimes force-fed to obtain a weight the government has described as "life-threatening".

Page 45: Social psychology

Are these cultures really that different?

Page 46: Social psychology

LOVE• Passionate Love: an

aroused state of INTENSE positive absorption of another.

• Compassionate Love: the deep affectionate attachment we feel for those with whom our lives are intertwined.

Page 47: Social psychology

What makes compassionate love work?

• Equity

• Self-disclosure

Page 48: Social psychology

Altruism

• Unselfish regard for the welfare of others.

• Kitty Genovese case.

• Bystander Effect (bystanders less willing to help if there are other bystanders around).

Page 49: Social psychology

Social Exchange Theory

• The idea that our social behavior is an exchange process, which we maximize benefits and minimize costs.

Page 50: Social psychology

Peacemaking

• Give people superordinate (shared) goals that can only be achieved through cooperation.

• Win Win situations through mediation.

• GRIT (Graduated and Reciprocated Initiatives in Tension Reduction).

Page 51: Social psychology

How groups affect our behavior?

• Leader

Page 52: Social psychology

Social Facilitation Theory

• If you are really good at something….or it is an easy task…you will perform BETTER in front of a group.

• If it is a difficult task or you are not very good at it…you will perform WORSE in front of a group (social impairment).

Page 53: Social psychology

Conformity Studies

• Adjusting one’s behavior or thinking to coincide with a group standard.

Page 54: Social psychology

Asch’s Study of Conformity

Page 55: Social psychology

Asch’s Results

• About 1/3 of the participants conformed.

• 70% conformed at least once.

To strengthen conformity:• The group is unanimous• The group is at least three

people.• One admires the group’s status• One had made no prior

commitment

Page 56: Social psychology

Milgram’s StudyOf

Obedience

Page 57: Social psychology

Results of the Milgram Study

Page 58: Social psychology

What did we learn from Milgram?

• Ordinary people can do shocking things.

• Ethical issues….• Would not have

received approval from today’s IRB (Internal Review Board).

Page 59: Social psychology

Group Dynamics

Page 60: Social psychology

Social Loafing

• The tendency for people in a group to exert less effort when pooling efforts toward a common goal than if they were individually accountable.

Page 61: Social psychology

Group Polarization

• Groups tend to make more extreme decisions than the individual.

Page 62: Social psychology
Page 63: Social psychology

Groupthink

• Group members suppress their reservations about the ideas supported by the group.

• They are more concerned with group harmony.

• Worse in highly cohesive groups.

Page 64: Social psychology

Deindividuation

• People get swept up in a group and lose sense of self.

• Feel anonymous and aroused.

• Explains rioting behaviors.

Page 65: Social psychology

Zimbardo’s Prison Study• Showed how we

deindividuate AND become the roles we are given.

• Philip Zimbardo has students at Stanford U play the roles of prisoner and prison guards in the basement of psychology building.

• They were given uniforms and numbers for each prisoner.

• What do you think happened?

Page 66: Social psychology

What happens when we become aware that our attitudes don’t match or

actions?

Page 67: Social psychology

Cognitive Dissonance Theory

• We do not like when we have either conflicting attitudes or when our attitudes do not match our actions.

•When they clash, we will change our attitude to create balance.

Page 68: Social psychology

Cognitive Dissonance Theory

Page 69: Social psychology

Cognitive Dissonance Theory

• How does cognitive dissonance theory play a part in pledging a fraternity?