Social Innovation for Resource Management
description
Transcript of Social Innovation for Resource Management
Policy Context CIP ICT Policy Support Programme
“Accelerate the deployment of EU-wide services of public interest”
Objective 6.2: Geographical Information “For the purpose of formulating, implementing,
monitoring and evaluating Community policy-making”
HABITATS: Social Validation of INSPIRE Annex III Data Structures in EU Habitats
Issues for INSPIRE Top-down consensus-building processes
across Member States Weak bottom-up feedback slows adoption
Annex III Data Themes depend on Annex I data models
Annex II and III Data Themes carried out in parallel
Habitats-related data normally managed by different and distinct entities
HABITATS Approach From “policy push” to “demand pull” approach
towards standards adoption Real citizens and businesses in “co-design”
processes through concrete pilots Interactive data modelling and iterative
network architecture development Social network community to define usage
scenarios and validate/disseminate results
Living Labs and Social Innovation
SOCIAL SPACES FORRESEARCH AND INNOVATION
PEOPLE-LEDINNOVATION
Habitats-related INSPIRE Themes 16. Sea regions
Seas and saline water body regions/sub-regions 17. Bio-geographical regions
Areas of homogeneous ecological conditions 18. Habitats and Biotopoes
Terrestrial and aquatic natural or semi-natural areas with specific ecological features
19. Species distribution Occurrence of animal and plant species
HABITATS Objectives Build HABITATS User Communities Consolidate best practice from previous experiences Define and implement data and metadata models Design a HABITATS SDI service architecture,
implement applets on-demand and integrate into a coherent service toolkit
Develop new services and service features through the validation pilots
Disseminate project results to environmental and scientific communitie
Sustainable operation of the HABITATS Services
Proposing Partnership
TRAGSA (ES)
FAO (INT)
MAC (IE)
HSRS (CZ)
TRAGSATEC (ES)
TUGraz (AT)
Madonie Park (IT)
ISPRA (IT)
FMI (CZ)
IMCS (LV)
Proposed Workplan
30-month workplan
Proposed budget:€ 2.425.055
Proposed effort:328 PMs
WP 2User Communities
WP 3Data and Metadata
Modelling
WP 5Pilot Validation
WP 4Network Services
WP 1 Project Management
WP 6 Dissemination and Exploitation
SOCIALVALIDATION
INSPIREDIRECTIVEUSER-DRIVEN
STANDARDSADOPTION
WP2: User Communities Social network platform
Open to service applet mash-ups Engagement of actors from partner networks
ICT-ENSURE, FAO/UNEP, ELARD, IEEM, Humboldt, GMES, Plan4all, C@R, ENoLL
State of art, scenarios, requirements Pilot and extended usage scenarios
Impact assessment Effectiveness for daily environmental activities
WP5: Validation Pilots Coordination of activities and thematic links Pilot platform integration and ad-hoc
mashups HABITATS service applets, widgets & gadgets
Execution of specific pilot activities 7 individual workplans
Evaluation and service simulation Impact of participatory co-design processes Simulation of service and business models
Pilot Scenarios (1) Management of natural resources
Wild Salmon Monitoring (IE) La Palma Protected Marine Area (ES)
Eco-tourism Hiking Trip Planner (IT) Soria Natural Reserve (ES)
Pilot Scenarios (2) Economic activities
Sheep and Goat Herd Management (IT) Economical activity at marine coastal benthic
habitats (LV) National policy
Czech National Forest Programme (CZ)
Interoperability Links
WILD SALMONMONITORING
LA PALMAMARINE
RESERVE
NATURAL RESOURCE MGMT
SHEEP & GOATHERD
MANAGEMENT
ECON ACTIVITYAT COASTAL
BENTHIC HAB.
ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES
HIKING TRIPPLANNER
SORIANATURALRESERVE
ECO-TOURISM
CZECH NAT’LFOREST
PROGRAMME
NAT’LPOLICY
Cross-Pilot Services FAO KIDS: Key Indicator
Data System FAO LADA: Portal for
Worldwide access to Land Degradation Information
IMCS/HSRS: Environmental Awareness and Training
Expected Results Multi-stakeholder communities Data and metadata models SDI network service architecture 7 operational pilot services Quick-prototyped validation platforms Dissemination and local and int’l events Service and business models, exploitation
plans, sustainability agreements
Drivers of Impact Adoption-driven approach to standards Built-in impact assessment Key adoption criteria: Relevance, Openness,
Responsiveness Future development scenarios
Scientific users for environmental management De-professionalised use for social involvement Economic activities linked to environmental mgmt.
Demand-pull drive of multi-channel services