Social Audit in MGNREGA West Bengal
-
Upload
dibyendu-sarkar-ias -
Category
Education
-
view
4.719 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Social Audit in MGNREGA West Bengal
Implementation of Social Audit under MGNREGA in West
Bengal : a Status Report
Date: Place:
In terms of Rule 4 of the Mahatma Gandhi NREGA (Audit of Schemes) Rules, 2011, as published by the Government of India, “Directorate of Transparency, Accountability and People’s Participation in Rural Development” is established at the Directorate of Panchayats & Rural Development
The Directorate is independent of the MGNREGA implementation structure in the State headed by the Commissioner, MGNREGS
The Commissioner of Panchayats & Rural Development (P&RD) is designated as the Director of social Audit
1. Progress made on setting up of Social Audit Directorate
The Structure
Department of P&RD
Social Audit Directorate (Director, SA)
Additional Director, SA Deputy Director, SA
State Coordinator, SA
State MGNREGA Cell (Commissioner, MGNREGS)
The Structure at the District level
District SA Cell
Additional District Magistrate, SA
District Nodal Officer, SA
District Coordinator, SA
The Structure at the Block level
Block SA Cell
Joint Block Dev. Officer, Block Nodal Officer, SA
Block Coordinator, SA
The reporting mechanism
Secretary,
P&RD
Director, SA
DSAC
BSAC
Account openedBudget prepared
and sharedRs.20 lakh advanced
Fund allocated by the District NREGA Cell
Fund allocated by the District NREGA Cell
Funding SA
State Directorate
District SA Cell
Block SA Cell
Staffing SA Units
Directorate
Director (not exclusive charge)
Additional Director (not
exclusive charge
Deputy Director (not
exclusive charge)
State Coordinator
(exclusive/ On contract)
Issues related to staffing at the State level
An Exclusive Director required
One Training Facilitator required
One MIS Coordinator
required
Efforts are to be made to enlist support of CSOs in Training/
Facilitation
Issues related to staffing at the District and Block levels
• Since inception we have exclusive contractual staff at the District and Block levels (DSAC & BSAC in all districts and blocks)
• Those staff are now brought into the fold of the SA Directorate
• We may require Training Support organizations for facilitating training in the field
Pilot Social Audit
• Team of Facilitators from three districts trained at NIRD– Jalpaiguri– Birbhum and– Hooghly
• Pilot SA conducted in selected Gram Panchayats in all 3 blocks
• Jalpaiguri extended the process in all Gram Panchayats of the district
Regular SA mechanism• Since inception the districts facilitate 2 rounds
of SA in all Blocks • Calendars are prepared and adhered to• Group of Social Auditors are identified from
each GP and placed for conducting SA after observing all processes– Inspection of records– Verification in the field– SA Gram Sabha
Changes in processes after the new system is introduced
• SA teams are to be selected from outside respective GP
• Massive orientation of the SA Team members are to be undertaken
• Specific assignment plans and calendars are to be prepared for deployment of SA Teams for conducting SA
How to bring about the changes?
• SA Directorate is to organize Training of Trainers– ToT already scheduled for all districts at the SIPRD– What about NGO association?
• Districts are to identify members of the SA Teams • Members of the SA Teams are to be trained and
deployed• All formats are to be designed and shared by the
Directorate• Actual SA to be conducted by following the SA Rules
Important deviations noted Action taken or contemplated
Awareness about statutory guarantee of wage employment under NREGA, as fall-back employment source and rights of the people under NREGA found to be poor among wage seekers.
Awareness generation drives through campaigns, IEC materials have been initiated at village level. Block IEC Coordinators (#341)are responsible for drawing up action plan and implement initiatives at village level.
In Some Gram Panchayats Job Cards of the wage seekers have been found in the custody of others.
Concerned Pos have been asked to lodge FIR/ take penal action under section 25 of NREGA against the guilty.
Some GPshave not taken initiatives of proactive disclosure of information and citizen information board at the worksite
Concerned POs are to ensure compliance by GPs. Specific instructions are issued from the State.
Important deviations noted Action taken or contemplated
Women are not empowered enough to demand wage employment under NREGA in some districts in particular.
Instructions have been issued for orientation of women through Self Help Groups.
In some Gram Panchayats obstacles have been faced in allotment of jobs during the peak period of wage demand under NREGA.
The Districts have been asked to take the help of suitable NGOs to identify new kind of works admissible under the Act to provide for more job opportunities.
Delayed payment of wages to the wage-seekers under NREGA due to insufficient manpower in Bank & Post Offices.
Once e-FMS is in operation, the delay might be substantially reduced
Important deviations noted Action taken or contemplated
After application for work in from – 4A dated receipts have not been issued to applicant in many cases.
Concerned Programme Officers have been asked to ensure compliance by GPs.
Work site facilities are unavailable in some cases.
Concerned Programme Officers have been asked to ensure compliance by GPs.
Rule relating to Grievance Redressal published in 2009 The salient features of the rule indicate the following:
Disposal of complaints within seven working days For matter to be resolved by any other authority, the matter needs to be
forwarded to that authority within seven working days with an intimation to the complainant
Provision of disposal of a complaint by the DPC within 30 working days Maintenance of Complaint Register at each level of implementation Provision of dated receipt to the person lodging the complaint Display of action taken report at the Notice Board at the PO level Provision of placing the status report of PO and that of the District at the
meeting of the VMC of the District formed under the guidelines of the Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India
The status report maintained at the State level to be deliberated at the meeting of the West Bengal State Employment Guarantee Council
Grievance Redressal through Social Audit
Perceived benefits of Social Audit noted• Social Audit helped awareness generation, participation of
people in the affairs of the governance and improve planning for implementation.
• During implementation Monitoring through Social Audit ensured informed decision making, prompt corrective action and promote dissuading risks in implementation.
• After implementation Evaluation of policy and programme effectiveness through social audit enhanced organizational and individual learning for future considerations.
• Thus transparency, accountability and participation involved in social audit reinforce each other during the process and promote good governance.
Assistance/Facilitation required • Capacity Building of Social Audit team to verify all
Documents, Resolution Book, Bills, Vouchers, Muster Roll related to the particular schemes and prepare social audit report requires additional resource allocation in the initial years to build in the system.
• We propose to create a pool of social auditors at the block level to provide leadership to the Social audit teams.
• We propose to pay the social audit team members @ semi skilled wage rate since voluntary work is not attracting people to involve in the process for 15 days.
Developing and scaling up pro-active disclosure and accountability
The wage seekers have been made aware of the provisions of the Act to enable them to use their right to demand employment as enshrined in the Act. The following activities are regularly done for better awareness of the people in the process of implementation of works under the Act.
Performance of the programme is depicted in the GP wall indicating progress of the work, rights and entitlements that is guaranteed etc.
1. Wall Paintings
Besides, the other forms of campaign include:
Organizing awareness generation camps from time to time at the Districts
Special campaign days are scheduled by the Districts from time to time to spread awareness
Special Campaign Months organised Self-help Groups are utilized for spreading awareness Labor Budget exercise is used for awareness generation Social Audit platforms are used to spread awareness among the
people. The State Government is also in the process of conceptualizing a
special multi-media campaign which we propose to put in place after the ensuing Panchayat elections.
Help line at the State Headquarters All grievances are enquired at the level of implementation
by officials from the Block and the District State Quality Monitors conduct regular visits to the
Districts and submit report to the Department Reports are analysed, action taken reports are sought
from the Districts Remedial measures are indicated
2. Grievance Redress
At present Ombudsmen cover all the nineteen Districts among themselves.
The State has completed one fresh round of appointment of Ombudsman to eleven selected Ombudsmen.
However, two of them have joined as yet.
3. Ombudsman
Best Practices: Stories from the field-
Social Audit in Jalpaiguri District
The Beginning of Social Audits in Jalpaiguri
Since 2008 followed guideline forwarded by the P&RD vide Memo No. 8952(19)/RD/NREGA/18R-
03/07 dated 12-12-2007
13 member team facilitated the entire processTeam was Gram Panchayat specificTeam elected during Gram SabhaMembers were selected from various fields.03 members were from the Self Help Groups01 member was from the NGO / Local Club
The district went with a new process for implementation of Social Audit, as per the MGNREG Audit of Schemes
Rule, 2011 having its pilot on 17th March, 2012.
Human Resource for Social Audit
Village Social Auditors(5 literate youth)
District Social Audit Coordinator(1 nos.)
Block Social Audit Coordinator(1 per Block)
Resource Persons
The District & Block Social Audit Coordinators act as the Resource Persons
The Asst. Prog. Officer, Junior Programme Officer also assist the Resource Persons
Block Social Audit Coordinators were trained on the new method
Block Social Audit Coordinators themselves facilitated Social Audit as the Social Auditors.
Role of the resource persons
Coordinate and facilitate the social audit process in the concerned Block
Identification and training of Social Auditors
Providing support to the Social Auditors during the Social Audit process
Ensure that the Social Audit is done in a transparent and accountable manner
Pre-Social Audit Processes
Schedule is drawn up by the DPC one month prior to the Social Audit Public Hearing
Selection of Social Audit Team Members by the Programme Officer
Intimation letters are sent to the Prodhan regarding dates of the Social Audit, schemes to be audited & documents to be provided 15-20 days prior to the Social Audit Public Hearing
Pre - Social Audit process
Resource Persons go into the villages and identify literate youth as per following criteria, and train them as Village Social Auditors
Family registered under MGNREGA Shouldn’t have any direct relationship with any
Political Party / Implementing Agency. Should be minimum Class X passed. Should be un-employed. Not a resident of the said Gram Panchayat (PIA)
area.
Social audit process
5 day process
Day 1 –Consolidation of Records.
Day 2 & 3– Field Verification
Day 4 – Social Audit Report writing
Day 5 – Social Audit Public Hearing
Consolidation of Records
The Social Auditors verify and consolidate all the MGNREGS records pertaining to the schemes to be audited.
Field verification At the Sansad level of the selected Gram Panchayat the team conducts door to door verification of the muster rolls, focused group discussions and worksite verifications. Awareness building of the rights and entitlements of the wage seekers is an important part of the SA process. Formats developed by the District Programme Coordinator is used during the process for data collection. During the field visit the team informs the primary stakeholders about the date, time & venue of the Public Hearing announced by the Program Officer to ensure participation of all.
Social Audit Report Writing
After the completion of the two day field visit the Social Auditors sit together and compiles the observations & information collected from field. On basis of same they prepare their issue-based report in the prescribed format for discussion during public hearing.
Announcement regarding Public Hearing
The Social Audit verification process ends with a Social Audit Public Hearing, which is scheduled by the PO & BDO through written instructions to the Gram Panchayat, media, elected representatives & all other stakeholders. Sufficient miking is done as one of the methods for publicizing the information for Public Hearing.
Social Audit Public Hearing Public Hearing convened by the DPC or
his / her Representative Information on schemes visited by the SA
team is shared. Muster Rolls are read out by the Team.Social Audit Report is read out. Evidence recorded by Presiding Officer. Opportunity given to all to respond.Decision taken during hearing. Imparting of awareness to the public.Proper documentation of the entire
event
ISSUES DISCUSSED DURING PUBLIC HEARING
1. AWARENESS2. REGISTRATION3. JOB CARD4. DEMAND FOR EMPLOYMENT5. PROVISION OF JOB & WORKSITE
FACILITY6. PAYMENT OF WAGES AND
UNEMPLOYMENT ALLOWANCE7. IMPACT OF THE SCHEMEs8. GRIEVANCE (IF ANY)
OUTCOME &
ACTION TAKEN
AWARENESSOUTCOME
a. Knowledge of the public about their rights and entitlements under the MGNREGS is not as expected.
ACTION TAKENb. Briefing of rights & entitlements done at Public
Hearing. c. GPs directed to display the information on rights
& entitlements on the walls of the office. d. Dissemination of information done through
leaflets, wall – writing, information board & like
REGISTRATION
OUTCOMEa. Knowledge of the public about registration &
renewal process under the MGNREGS is not as expected.
b. Money sometimes taken for registration or renewal
ACTION TAKENc. Entire process of registration & renewal under
MGNREGS is done in the public hearing and during field visit.
JOB CARDOUTCOME
a. In some cases the job cards not found in the custody of the job card holders.
b. Job details not properly entered.c. Knowledge of the job card holders about entry of job
details in Job Card is not as expectedACTION TAKEN
d. All are requested in Public Hearing to keep their job cards in their own custody.
e. Gram Panchayats directed to ensure job card entry and in event of any lapses invoke Section 25 of the MGNREGA, 2005.
f. Necessity of keeping job card updated briefed in Public Hearing.
DEMAND FOR EMPLOYMENTOUTCOME
a. Wage seekers always do not demand on their own.b. Dated receipts not provided to wage seekers.
ACTION TAKENc. Briefing of process of registering demand under MGNREGS are
done.d. Multiple channels for demand registration through SHGs,
Panchayat Members, Teacher, CSC, Anganwadi workers etc. are introduced.
e. Gram Panchayats directed to ensure acceptance of all demand for work & issuance of dated receipts and in event of any lapses invoke Section 25 of the MGNREGA, 2005.
f. Gram Panchayats to identify official to receive demand application & issue dated receipt on behalf of Pradhan.
JOB PROVISION & WORKSITE FACILITIES
OUTCOMEa. Job not provided to all within specified time. b. Worksite facilities and display boards with detail
information not provided in all worksites.ACTION TAKEN
c. Gram Panchayats directed to ensure provision of work to all job seekers.
d. Gram Panchayats directed to ensure all the worksite facilities at the worksites.
e. Inspection of on-going works to be increased.f. Gram Panchayats directed to ensure concrete
display boards with all requisite informations.
PAYMENT OF WAGES & UNEMPLOYMENT ALLOWANCE
OUTCOMEa. Delayed wage payment in certain cases. b. Non payment of unemployment allowance. c. Knowledge of the public about unemployment
allowance not as expected.
ACTION TAKENd. Gram Panchayats directed to ensure timely
measurement and payment of wages and unemployment allowances to the job seekers.
e. Briefing of rights & entitlements under MGNREGS during the public hearing by the Presiding Officer and like.
IMPACT OF THE SCHEME
OUTCOMEa. The worksites inspected (mostly under
water conservation and rural connectivity) found beneficial for villagers. ACTION TAKEN
b. Presiding Officer requested all to attend the Gram Sansad meetings to prepare plan, in advance.
c. Also requested to take up of works of various types, to create durable assets.
GRIEVANCE OUTCOME
a. No serious allegation (of financial irregularity & like) were raised.
ACTION TAKENb. Presiding Officer requested all the villagers
to report irregularities, if any, to the concerned authority like PO and DPC.
c. All were requested to call on the district helpline.
Decision by Presiding Officer
DPC & DM, MGNREGS or his/her representative presides at the Public Hearing. For every issue that is read out by the Social Audit Team the Presiding Officer records his or her recommendation of action to Government in the Decision Taken Report.
Post social audit Social Audit & Decision Taken Report
hosted on public domain
Programme Officer (BDO) takes the initial follow up action.
Report sent to the District Programme Coordinator for information within 7 days
Purity of Social Audit
Social Auditors move with the primary stakeholders
Public Hearing in an open & public place with prior and sufficient publicity.
Not presided over or controlled by the Implementing Agency
Social Auditors not the residents of the same Gram Panchayat.
Objective process: evidence based
Strict Code of Conduct for Social Auditors
Non Negotiables of SA Process
Strict Code of Conduct for the Social Auditors
No room for Political bias or intervention
Absolute good conduct towards villagers
No press meets or press releases by Social Auditors
No room for intervention by the Implementing Agency
IMPACT OF THE SOCIAL AUDIT
The Social Audit was immensely successful in its attempts at highlighting the problems in the implementation of the programme. Some of the useful recommendations that came out of this is to ensure its conduct twice every year in all sansads, and introduction of e-FMS at the earliest. During field verification & public hearing the spirit of the MGNREGA is shared with an ease that enhances the mandate
Financial Implications
per social auditor per day
= ` 100 + No. of household visited during field visit X ` 1.50
Total No. of Social Auditors
Number of Social Audits conducted as per the MGNREG Audit of Schemes Rule, 2011 during
2012 - 2013
No. of Sub – Division where one round of Social Audit has been conducted : 03
No. of Blocks where one round of SA has been conducted : 13
No. of Gram Panchayat where one round of Social Audit has been conducted: 17
Apart from this, Social Audit, in older format, was conducted in rest of the
Gram Panchayats
Number of Social Audits conducted as per the MGNREG Audit of Schemes Rule, 2011 during
2013 - 2014
No. of Sub – Division where 1st round of Social Audit has been conducted : 03
No. of Blocks where 1st round of Social Audit has been conducted : 13
No. of Gram Panchayat where 1st round of Social Audit has been conducted: 46
Planned for all 146 Gram Panchayats but owing to the Panchayat General Election, 2013 only 46 could be covered so far.
Profile of the Presiding Officer
• Joint Programme Officer• Asst. Programme Officer• Block Extension Officer
Officer deputed in one Block presides the Public Hearing of
other Block
Key persons who are invited during Public Hearing
• MP, MLA, Members of PRI from the concerned Gram Panchayat
• All officials of the Gram Panchayat including Pradhan & Up – Pradhan
• Savapati / Saha – Savapati of the concerned Panchayat Samity.
• District / Sub – Divisional / Block Officials• Media
Key persons who attended Public Hearings till date
• MLA• State Level Monitor, MGNREGS• Savapati• Saha – Savapati• Leader of Opposition of
Panchayat Samity / Gram Panchayat
• PO & BDO• Media persons
IT in Social Audit
Exclusive link in the District web site www.nregajalpaiguri.com for Social Audit
All Social Audit reports & Action Taken reports are available in the public domain
Social Audit video – clippings are also available in the public domain
Our planning for 2013-14
Conduct 2nd phase of Social Audit as per MGNREG Audit of Schemes Rule, 2011 in all 146 Gram Panchayat.
Jt. Block Development Officer cum Block Nodal Officer (SA) of one block to preside Public Hearing of adjacent block
Ensure presence of aware & trained literate youth in every Social Audit Public Hearing
Ensure active participation of primary stakeholder in every sphere of implementation, planning & monitoring
Ensure more accountable & transparent system
Our future planning
Conduction of Social Audit Public Hearing for two or more Gram Panchayat at the same platform
Our Constrains1. Absence of sufficient financial
support to the Village Social Auditors.2. Large number of sansads.3. Tendency of the members to leave
the process in between.4. In-ability to engage female members
as they are reluctant to move to other Gram Panchayats.
5. In – ability to upload the Social Audit & Decision Taken Report (hard copy) through MIS in www.nrega.nic.in in case the size exceeds.
A PICTORIAL REPRESENTATION OF SOCIAL AUDITORS IN JALPAIGURI
Social Auditor 1
Social Auditor 2
Social Auditor 3
Social Auditor 4
Social Auditor 5
Social Auditor 1
Social Auditor 1a
Social Auditor 1b
Social Auditor 1c
Social Auditor 1d
Social Auditor 1e
Social Auditor 2
Social Auditor 2a
Social Auditor 2b
Social Auditor 2c
Social Auditor 2d
Social Auditor 2e
Social Auditor 3
Social Auditor 3a
Social Auditor 3b
Social Auditor 3c
Social Auditor 3d
Social Auditor 3e
Social Auditor 4
Social Auditor 4a
Social Auditor 4b
Social Auditor 4c
Social Auditor 4d
Social Auditor 4e
Social Auditor 5
Social Auditor 5a
Social Auditor 5b
Social Auditor 5c
Social Auditor 5d
Social Auditor 5e
Presiding Officer at Public Hearing
Social Auditor Reading out Social Audit Report
Wage seekers seeking clarification
Programme Officer responding
State Level Monitor responding
IEC activity during Public Hearing
Women participation during Public Hearing
Reporting in
News dailies
Thank You