Soc334e1notes
-
Upload
adam-richmond -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Soc334e1notes
-
8/22/2019 Soc334e1notes
1/11
GROUP DYNAMICS
The Sociology of Small Groups
Importance of Small Group Studies
groups are biggest part of life
most work is done in and with groups
knowing how and why groups function, or fail to function is a key to
success
Why Do People Form Groups?
safety
preservation
many other reasons
What Is a Group?
interaction with expectation about others behavior
sense of belonging
are two people a group?
What Makes a SMALL Group?
how many is small?
importance of size
MODELS OF GROUP DEVELOPMENT
Recurring Phase Model
Equilibrium Model
Sequential Stage Model
RECURRING PHASE MODEL
certain issues dominate group life
over time the main issues resurface in predictable phases
knowing the phases and the recurrence rate improves participation
EQUILIBRIUM MODEL
groups fluctuate between task and relationship behaviors
natural tendency for the living group to seek balance
success and longevity related to the balance
SEQUENTIAL STAGE MODEL (task group development model)
-
8/22/2019 Soc334e1notes
2/11
there is a typical order that all groups pass through
forming - storming - norming - performing - adjourning
orientation - conflict - emergence - reinforcement - adjourning
The Science of Group Dynamics
What is a group?
Interdependence among members
Shared expectations about behavior
Sense of belonging
A group defined:
two or more people who interact on the basis of shared expectations
about each others behavior and have a sense of belonging.
Common Features of Groups
Communication
Face to face communication over a period of time.
Influence The group influences the individual and individual has influence on
the group.
Interaction
Regular interaction in ways that develop a group identity.
Interdependence
Each member depends to a degree on the others to accomplish goals
Interrelations
Dynamic interrelations means that the personal relations among
members is constantly changing. Psychological significance
The group has an impact on the psychology of the individual identity
Shared identity
The group identity is or can be separated from the individual
Structure
Consisting of status and role differentiation between and among the
members
Primary Group
Relatively small in size
Intimate interaction Long lasting
Do not necessarily need a goal or purpose for association
No leadership requirement
Secondary Group
Relatively large in size
Individuals can remain anonymous
-
8/22/2019 Soc334e1notes
3/11
Little or no face to face interaction
A goal or purpose
Leadership requirement
Last a short period of time
Groups disbands (or reorganizes) after the goal is accomplishedAre Groups Real?
Some say NO:
No concrete nervous system
Actions of all are nothing but the sum of individual inputs
Some say YES:
Field Theory
The behavior of people in groups is based on the individuals in
interaction with the environment
Interactionism formula
B=f(P,E) Behavior = function of interaction of personal characteristics with
environmental factors.
Group Development
Bruce Tuckerman
Group Development Theory
Groups develop through five basic stages:
Forming - apprehension
Storming - conflict
Norming status and role attainment Performing goal striving and accomplishment
Adjourning disbanding or re-organizing
STUDYING GROUPS
Research Design and Theory
Observational Techniques
Participant Observation
Direct Observation
Case Study
Participant Observation Researcher roles
Complete participant
No separation between the researcher and the members of the group.
The researcher is a complete functioning member of the group.
Participant as observer
Participates with group knowledge of the researcher role.
-
8/22/2019 Soc334e1notes
4/11
Observer as participant
Group is aware of researcher role, but researcher does not participate
Complete observer
Group is unaware that the researcher is observing
Direct Observation
Types of Observation
Unstructured observations made in the natural setting. No formal
content to the observations.
Semi-Structured Observations made in the natural setting using an
observation instrument (i.e. IPA)
Completely Structured Researcher completely controls the
environmental setting.
Case Studies
Refers to an in-depth examination of a single group.
Pros Good for exploratory investigation of group processes
Detailed information is helpful to all future researchers
Cons
Limited generalizability
Researcher bias
Experimentation
Refers to situations where the researcher directly controls extraneous
variables and at least one independent variable. Independent variable
Dependent variable
Pros
Casual relationships
Small researcher bias
Cons
Generalizability
Hawthorne effect
Quasi-experimental Studies
A non-experimental technique that uses statistical data to comparevariables.
Causation criteria must be checked
No manipulation of naturally occurring variables is done
Examples: correlational studies, questionnaires, existing data analysis
Causation Criteria
-
8/22/2019 Soc334e1notes
5/11
Time-order sequence
Correlation between variables
No third variable explanation
Theory in Small Group Research
Motivational Theories
Stress the role played by the group members motivations; habits,
goals, expectations, etc.
Behavioral Theories
Stress the role of external social forces on the behavior of individual
group members; rewards, punishments, power dynamics, etc.
Systems Theories
Stress the role of organizational systems and inter-relationships
between members on the behavior of people in groups.
Cognitive Theories
Stress the role on individual mental processes used to organize andgive meaning to environmental factors acting upon the group.
Biological Theories
Stress the role of individual biology on the behavior of members of a
group.
The Individual and the Group
Do People Need Groups?
Isolation to Belonging
Isolation
Alone as good
Introspection
Rejuvenation
Meditation
Alone as torture
Depression
Confusion
Survival
Isolation to Belonging Belonging
Inclusion as good
Need to belong
Natural selection and genes
Survival
Inclusion as torture
-
8/22/2019 Soc334e1notes
6/11
Disease transmission
Predators
Value and culture clash
Individualism to Collectivism
Individualism a world view based on the idea that people are
autonomous and must be free to act and think in ways they prefer, rather
than submit to the demands of the group.
Collectivism a world view based on the idea that the group needs
and goals are more important than any idividual
Individualism to Collectivism
Individual or collective orientations generate vastly different
perceptions of the world around us.
Ingroup v. outgroup orientation
Ingroup the people we associate with are the focus of attention,effort, and energy.
Outgroup the group or groups other people belong to. Particularly
those that are different or inferior to my group.
Exchange v. communal relations
Exchange relations focus on the individual inputs to the group. Each
member strives for the highest reward and the lowest input. Self-serving
(egocentric) means max reward, and lowest contribution.
Communal relations focus on the rewards the group receives rather
than the individual. Work is viewed as a group effort. Group serving
(sociocentric) means concern only for the well-being of the community.
Individualism to Collectivism
Worldview also influences the norm structure of the individual and
group.
Equality is a norm that requires the equal division of rewards to all
members of the group, regardless on personal input.
Equity is a norm that requires a division of rewards that is based on
each members input to the group rewards.
GROUP FORMATION THEORIES
Psychodynamic Theories
Replacement Theory
FIRO
Social Theories
-
8/22/2019 Soc334e1notes
7/11
Social Comparison
Social Exchange Theory
Psychodynamic Theories
Replacement Theory The theory says that people join groups to fulfill some biological or
psychological needs that would not otherwise be satisfied.
The Basis for the Theory: two interrelated concepts
Identification refers to the tendency of a person to use role models as
a guide to the formation of their own conscious personality.
In short people find someone to admire or look up to and then try to
become like the model.
The more successful the person is at emulating the model the better
the person feels about him/herself. Transference refers to the tendency of people to replace the
identification once directed toward the parental figure with the identification
now directed toward a central authority figure (leader).
If a number of people transfer identification to the same person a
group is formed.
Groups are the way people replace the original family group.
Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation (FIRO)
William Schultz suggests that there are three basic needs satisfied
through group formation. Inclusion
Control
Affection
Inclusion
People have a basic need to be accepted by others and to accept
others.
People want to be accepted by the people they accept.
Control
People who have a high need for control, want to control the members
and directions of the groups.
People who are low need for control, want to be controlled by others.
Affection
-
8/22/2019 Soc334e1notes
8/11
People need to establish and maintain emotional relations.
A desire to love others and be loved by others.
FIRO and the Formation of Groups Groups will form and be effective when there is Originator
compatibility and Interchange compatibility.
Originator compatibility means that there has to be some
complementary quality among the potential group members.
The members share a need for inclusion, control, and/or affection.
Interchange means there must be agreement about how much control,
inclusion, and affection should exist between the group. Someone may want
to be controlled but not want to be controlled all the time
SOCIAL THEORIES
Social Comparison Theory
The main tenet of the theory is that humans form groups because they
need information about themselves and their environment.
Information about the self and the environment can only be acquired
from other people.
The Human Need for Information
Belief Confirmation
In some cases we form groups because we want to feel that the waywe believe and our attitudes about things are right.
Reality Test
Sooner or later we must test the reality of our attitudes, in order for
adult personality development.
The reality test can only be done through other people.
Self Esteem
Our attitudes are judged to be good if they correspond to the attitudes
of significant others.
Social Comparison People come together because they want information and we get that
information through social comparison.
Social Comparison Propositions
1. Individuals will affiliate when their attitudes and beliefs are shaken.
2. Un-interpretable events provoke people to seek reality information.
-
8/22/2019 Soc334e1notes
9/11
3. Affiliation with others is the only successful method to satisfy the need
for information.
Birth Order Effect
Those who are first born receive more close attention from parents.
First born and only children develop a greater need for socialcomparison cues.
The first born has stronger need for affiliation.
Social Exchange Theory
The main principle of the theory is that people carry out their social
interaction in the very same way that businesses carry out economic
exchange.
People make decisions about whether or not to engage in social
interaction with someone on the basis of the judged value (or desirability) ofthat interaction.
The value of any social interact is determined by the persons mental
calculation (cognitive calculus) of the costs and rewards.
Value = Anticipated Rewards Expected Costs
Minimax Principle maintains that people will join groups that provide
them with the maximum number of valued rewards while incurring the
fewest numbers of costs.
Comparison Levels Determine Group Membership
Operates on two interrelated levels of comparison:
The comparison level refers to the standard by which the individualevaluates group membership.
Heavily influenced by past experience with the most similar groups.
The CL is the lowest level of reward acceptable for the person.
The CL is determined by assessing all the known costs and rewards
incurred with the membership.
The alternative comparison level (AC) refers to the comparison of
one specific group to other available groups.
The AC is really the best rewards available to someone given the
available alternatives. The AC is the main factor determining group membership.
The CL is the main factor determining satisfaction with group
membership.
Individuality V. Collectivity
Personal Identity
-
8/22/2019 Soc334e1notes
10/11
The part of self concept that is derived from individualistic qualities
like traits, beliefs, and skills.
Social Identity
The part of self concept that is derived from belonging to social
groups. Self conceptions that are shared by members of the same group. i.e.
Americans
Which identity type is most preferable?
Individualism V. Collectivism
Individualism refers to an orientation that places greater emphasis on
the individual (rights, independence) and less emphasis on the rights of the
group.
Examples included the USA, Great Britain, Australia
Collectivism refers to an orientation that places greater emphasis on
the similarities of the group rather than the individual characteristics of the
members.
Examples include Costa Rica, Panama, Venezuela
Variations in Individualism and Collectivism
Just as nations vary on the emphasis of individualism and
collectivism, so do individuals.
Some people are interdependent.
Dispositionally predisposed to place greater emphasis on group goal
rather than their personal needs. Some people are independents.
Dispositionally predisposed to place greater emphasis on their
personal needs rather than group goals.
What situational and/or environmental factors influence a person to be
interdependent or independent?
Group Serving V. Self Serving Bias
Group Serving Bias refers to the tendency to highlight the groups
responsibility for a success. We all did well! We all worked hard for the
success! Further, the bias downplays the group responsibility for failure,
blaming external situational factor for failure.
Self Serving Bias refers to the tendency to claim individual
responsibility for success, while blaming negative outcomes on external
social forces beyond individual control.
-
8/22/2019 Soc334e1notes
11/11
People who do well on a test give credit to themselves for the success,
but people who do poorly on a test blame the professor, the test, their
friends, their family, the class, etc.