Smith AGU

33
Greenland supraglacial rivers during the extreme 2012 melt season Laurence C. Smith 1 , Asa K. Rennermalm 2 , Carl J. Legleiter 3 , Alberto E. Behar 4 , Vena W. Chu 1 , Richard R. Forster 5 , Colin J. Gleason 1 , Adam LeWinter 6 , Samiah E. Moustafa 2 , Brandon T. Overstreet 3 , Lincoln H. Pitcher 1 , Marco Tedesco 7 , Kang Yang 1 1 UCLA, 2 Rutgers, 3 U. Wyoming, 4 NASA JPL, 5 U. Utah, 6 CRREL, 7 CUNY American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

description

Here is my overview of project results so far. Please do not disseminate as none of these maps or data are submitted yet

Transcript of Smith AGU

Page 1: Smith AGU

Greenland supraglacial rivers during the extreme 2012 melt seasonLaurence C. Smith1, Asa K. Rennermalm2, Carl J. Legleiter3, Alberto E. Behar4, Vena W. Chu1, Richard R. Forster5, Colin J. Gleason1, Adam LeWinter6, Samiah E. Moustafa2, Brandon T. Overstreet3, Lincoln H. Pitcher1, Marco Tedesco7, Kang Yang1

1 UCLA, 2Rutgers, 3U. Wyoming, 4NASA JPL, 5U. Utah, 6CRREL, 7CUNY

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 2: Smith AGU

Greenland supraglacial rivers during the extreme 2012 melt seasonLaurence C. Smith1, Asa K. Rennermalm2, Carl J. Legleiter3, Alberto E. Behar4, Vena W. Chu1, Richard R. Forster5, Colin J. Gleason1, Adam LeWinter6, Samiah E. Moustafa2, Brandon T. Overstreet3, Lincoln H. Pitcher1, Marco Tedesco7, Kang Yang1

1 UCLA, 2Rutgers, 3U. Wyoming, 4NASA JPL, 5U. Utah, 6CRREL, 7CUNY

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 3: Smith AGU

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 4: Smith AGU

Ice margin melt insufficient to explain Watson River flooding

[C43C-0616 Asa Rennermalm]

Simultaneious flooding in the Isortoq River

[H31E-1162 Colin Gleason]

6/13/11

7/13/12

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 5: Smith AGU

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 6: Smith AGU

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 7: Smith AGU

Acoustic Doppler Current Profile (ADCP) measurements for velocity, bathymetry, water surface slope, roughness coefficient

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 8: Smith AGU

Manual radar and field surveysof flow velocity, width, depth,slope, roughness coefficient

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 9: Smith AGU

EMPIRICAL HYDRAULICS

[C43C-0618 Vena Chu]

Parameter Units Min Mean Max

Discharge (Q) m3s-1 0.01 3.75 28.78

Width (w) m 0.20 4.62 19.06

Avg depth (d) m 0.03 0.48 1.950

Avg surface velocity (v) ms-1 0.24 1.09 2.59

Cross-sectional area (A) m2 0.01 5.76 29.00

Wetted perimeter (P) m 0.21 6.01 31.14

Width/Depth Ratio (F) 1.27 11.23 42.17

Hydraulic radius (R) m 0.02 0.36 1.63

Froude number (Fr) 0.06 0.89 3.12

Manning's resistance coefficient (n) 0.01 0.14 1.28

Water surface slope (S) 0.001 0.032 0.088

Manual radar and field surveysof flow velocity, width, depth,slope, roughness coefficient

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 10: Smith AGU

“Drone-boat” measurements of water column spectra and attenuation (ASD), and depth (echo sounder)

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 11: Smith AGU

Sacrificial GPS drifters(3 velocity, 1 depth sounder)

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 12: Smith AGU

Sacrificial GPS drifters(3 velocity, 1 depth sounder)

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 13: Smith AGU

Sacrificial GPS drifters(3 velocity, 1 depth sounder)

Typical flow velocities ~ 0.5-2 m/s

Max 6.6 m/s with supercritical flow (Fr = 3.6)d super

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 14: Smith AGU

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 15: Smith AGU

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 16: Smith AGU

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 17: Smith AGU

32 WorldView-2 scenes acquired simultaneously with field campaigns (July 18-23)

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 18: Smith AGU

(Yang and Smith, in press)

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 19: Smith AGU

[C43C-0619 Kang Yang]

(Yang and Smith, in press)

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 20: Smith AGU

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 21: Smith AGU

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 22: Smith AGU

For this July 18-23 WV2 mosaic:-5,514 km2 mapped with WV2 (~1100m to 1600m a.s.l.)

-5,928 km total length “blue-water” rivers

-Typical survival length scale ~10-20 km

-596 actively flowing moulins

-100% of mapped rivers terminate in moulins, including lateral breaches from all remaining lakes

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 23: Smith AGU

Modeled potentiometric depressions- GIMP DEM(Howat et al, 2012)- basal topography(Bamber et al, 2012)

C43C-0614 (Lincoln Pitcher)

C43C-0623 (Samiah Moustafa)

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 24: Smith AGU

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 25: Smith AGU

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 26: Smith AGU

Can supraglacial water fluxes be estimated from space?

- “Universal” supraglacial river hydraulic geometry relationships holds promise using an empirical approach

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 27: Smith AGU

Can supraglacial river bathymetry be estimated from space?

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 28: Smith AGU

Can supraglacial river bathymetry be estimated from space?

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 29: Smith AGU

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 30: Smith AGU

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 31: Smith AGU

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 32: Smith AGU

Conclusions & future work

Greenland’s supraglacial rivers are large, extensive, and hydraulically efficient.

During July 18-23, 2012, these rivers were transporting large fluxes of meltwater over and into the ice sheet, with virtually no depression storage and 100% termination into moulins.

This observation, combined with proglacial discharge measurements at the ice edge, suggests that record terrestrial floods downstream received significant meltwater inputs from the ice sheet interior.

Field spectral and hydraulic measurements hold promise for calibrating remote sensing WorldView-2 data for estimating supraglacial river fluxes. This goal, together with “closing” the water balance (from ADCP discharge measurements in the Isortoq and Watson rivers) are key future objectives.

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco

Page 33: Smith AGU

Logistics support:CH2MHill Polar Field ServicesKISSAir Greenland

Special thanks to:Paul Morin (Polar Geospatial Center)Claire Porter (Polar Geospatial Center)Ian Howat (OSU)Jonathan Bamber (U. Bristol)Ian Joughin (U. Washington)

Supported by the NASA Cryosphere Program Program Manager Thomas Wagner (grant NNX11AQ38G)

Poster session this afternoon:

C43C-0614 Lincoln PitcherC43C-0616 Asa RennermalmC43C-0618 Vena ChuC43C-0619 Kang YangC43C-0623 Samiah Moustafa

American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2012, San Francisco