SME Development in Supporting Trade Liberalisation: The Malaysian Case K. Karunajothi SME...
-
Upload
justice-charles -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of SME Development in Supporting Trade Liberalisation: The Malaysian Case K. Karunajothi SME...
SME Development in Supporting Trade Liberalisation: The Malaysian Case
SME Development in Supporting Trade Liberalisation: The Malaysian Case
K. KarunajothiSME Corporation Malaysia
17 August 2011
Presentation covers
Trade liberalisation measures
1
2
Policies Going Forward3
SME Development in Malaysia
Conclusion4
2
• SMEs constitute bulk of businesses in Malaysia:
- 99.2% of establishments (2003: 548,267)
- Bulk (80%) micro enterprises, with less than 5 workers
- Mainly concentrated in services sector (87%)
SMEs are the backbone of the economy
1
3
National SME Development Council, high level body to chart SME policy direction
4
Developing progressive and resilient Bumiputera SMEs and entrepreneurs
-
III.Enhancing access
to financing
I.Strengthening enabling
infrastructure
II.Building capacity and
capability
Stra
tegi
c Th
rust
sO
bjec
tives
Promote development of competitive and resilient SMEs in all sectors towards increasing SME contribution to the economy
Economic Socio Economic
Promoting development of SMEs in knowledge-based
industries
Enhancing viability of SMEs across all sectors
A structured approach in SME Development since 2004
5
Policy formulationand
Research
“One-Referral” Information and Advisory
SME CORP. MALAYSIA
Secretariat to NSDC
MINISTRIES AND
AGENCIES
SMEs
PRIVATE SECTOR
NSDC
CoordinatePolicies
6
… and a dedicated Agency for SME development
10%(8 ~8.5%)e
-4%-2%0%2%4%6%8%
10%12%
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
GDP Growth SME Growth
Efforts have shown positive results….however contribution to GDP remains low
SME growth outperformed overall GDP growth during 2004 – 10:• NSDC was set up and SME development accorded national agenda • Other supportive policies
GDP annual change (2000 price)
Year
e- estimate
7
GDP & SME Growth
16%
39%
51%
31%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Low income
countries
Middle income
countries
High income
countries
Malaysia
SME GDP in Selected Countries
31% of GDP
• Access to market• Innovation and technology• Human capital management• Access to financing
SMEs face numerous challenges from changing business environment, includ. liberalisation pressures
8
…it also opens new opportunities for SMEs
9
Malaysia’s trade policy promotes & supports creation of a liberal & fair global trading environment
Malaysia’s trade liberalisation is anchored on rule-based multilateral trading system – WTO and complemented by regional and bilateral FTAs
STATUS REGIONAL BILATERAL
Concluded60% of Malaysia’s
global tradeunder preferential trade
ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA)ASEAN-China ASEAN-ROKASEAN-Japan Comprehensive Economic Partnership (AJCEP)ASEAN-India (Goods)ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand
Malaysia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (MJEPA)Malaysia-PakistanComprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (MPCEPA) Malaysia-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (MNZFTA)Malaysia-Chile Free Trade Agreement (MCFTA)Malaysia-India Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (MICECA)
Under Negotiations> 80% of Malaysia’s
global tradeunder preferential trade
ASEAN-Japan (Investment and Services)ASEAN-India (Investment and Services)Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement
Malaysia-Australia Malaysia-TurkeyMalaysia-EUGulf Cooperation Council (Framework Agreement)
For Consideration ASEAN+3 (Japan, China and Korea)ASEAN+6 (Japan, China, Korea, Australia, New Zealand and India)
Malaysia-Bangladesh
10
2
11
The trade agreements covers a broad scope
Lower Import tariffs
Equity liberalisation
Services AFAS Timeline (equity)SME
share, %No.Subsectors Year 2010 Year 2015
1. Distributive Trade 51% 70% 99.6
2. Business Services 51% 70% 99.3
3. Healthcare 70% 70% 99.0
4. Communications 70% 70% 98.7
5. Logistics 51% 70% 98.7
6. Education 51% 70% 98.4
7. ICT 100% 100% 92.3
8. Tourism 70% 70% 91.3
9. Construction 51% 70% n.a.
10. R&D 49% 70% n.a
Services sector liberalisation is ongoing which affects particularly SMEs
12
April 2009: 27 specific services sub-sectors fully liberalised and more to go…
April 2009: 27 specific services sub-sectors fully liberalised and more to go…
Quantum leap in GDP via innovation &
productivity-led growth
Reduction in income
disparity through
support for
microenterprise
Creating national/ regional/ international
champions
Going forward, SMEs important to achieve growth targets to become a developed nation by 2020
SMEs in NEM & RMK10
High Income Economy
Increasing microenterprises’ contribution to the
economy
13
3
•Entrepreneur Development •Retraining and Skills Upgrading•National Dual Training System•Content Industry Development•Franchise Development•Taste of Malaysia•Training for Furniture Design & Making•Craft Entrepreneur Development
•Automotive Centre Development Project•Cottage Retail Shop•Permanent Food Production Park•Products Collection and Marketing Centre•Incubation & Technopreneur Development•Integrated Aquaculture Zone
Strengthening Enabling Infrastructure
19 programmmes
Strengthening Enabling Infrastructure
19 programmmes
• Business Quality & Enhancement
• SME-Brand Development• SME-University Internship• Market Development Grant • Exporters Training• SME Expert Advisory Panel • Biopreneur Clinic
Building Capacity and Capability
150 programmmes
Building Capacity and Capability
150 programmmes
• Franchise Financing Scheme• Micro Enterprise Fund • Soft Loan Scheme for
Service Sector• Soft Loan Scheme for Automation and Modernisation• Soft Loan for SMEs • Business Accelerator Programme
• Tourism Infrastructure Fund• Maritime Fund• ICT, Biotechnology and
Technology Development Project Financing
• Green Technology Financing Scheme
Enhancing Access to Financing
50 programmmes
Enhancing Access to Financing
50 programmmes
In 2011, 219 SME Development programmes worth RM5.9 bil are being implemented
14
15
Key mechanism to upgrade SMEs to the next level
• Diagnostic tool to rate and enhance competitiveness of SMEs based on their performance and capabilities.
• Developed in-house in Aug 2007
What is SCORE?
• Identify strengths and weaknesses for improvements; and
• Facilitate linkages.Function
• Business Performance• Financial Capability• Management Capability• Production Capability
Parameter
Characteristics
• Work with partner agencies on the various SCORE models
Implementation Channel
Implementation Channel
Example of Radar Diagram for 3-Star company
Analysis: Weak in financial capability
Assistance: Require financial management training
• Technical Capability• Quality System• Innovation
• 0 – 2 Stars : Very basic business operation
• 3 – 5 Stars : Some degree of sophistication and can be groomed for export
SCORE a tool to rate capability of SMEs
16
SMEsSMEs
BusinessPerformance
Financial Capability
Technical Capability
Management Capability
Quality System
Innovation
Production
Capacity
• Corporate Planning• Technology & Innovation Management• Human Capital Development • IT Adoption
• Sales • Average Growth• Export• Marketing • Customer Satisfaction
• Current Assets• Current Liabilities • Gearing Ratio• Profit
• Capital Investment per Employee (CIPE)• Factory Automation Level• Machine Utilisation
• Intellectual Property Rights• Product & Process
Improvement • Capability of Products & Process Improvement
Activities
• Practice of Continuous Improvement• Certification• Awards
The assessment is comprehensive covering various parameters
17
• No. of Trained Personnel• MTS Ratio• Types of Technology Utilised
Starting Point
• National Innovation Action Plan – Strategic Thrust 4
• Adaption of Korean Innobiz Innovation Evaluation System
Objective Foster innovative companies to become profitable global ‘blue-chip’ companies
Current Available Sectors
Maf & Non-Maf, Biotech, Expert Industrial Design, Software/ ICT, Agriculture, Environment and Construction.
Cost • Standard on-site audit fee −SMEs: RM5,000 −Non-SMEs: RM10,000 • Additional logistics charges for
companies outside Klang Valley
18
Assessment Process
1-InnoCERT programme to rate innovative companies
IITechnology Technology innovationinnovation
abilityability
IIIITechnologyTechnology
commercializationcommercialization abilityability
IIIIIITechnology Technology innovationinnovation
management management abilityability
IVIVTechnology Technology innovation innovation
resultresult
R&D activity indexTechnology Innovation SystemTechnology Innovation AdministrationTechnology Accumulation SystemTechnology Analysis Ability
Technology manufacturing abilityAbility to develop products using TechnologyMarketing ability
Management’s innovation abilityAbility to respond to changesManager’s sense of values
Outcome of TechnologyCompetitiveness ProgressTechnology management resultTechnological Achievements (forecasting)
SMEs will be assessed using 4 Main Criteria:
19
1-InnoCERT assessment criteria
Branding Malaysia through the National Mark
20
21
Assessment of the National Mark
Top management’s guidance & direction towards brand
success
Allocation of company resources to maintain brand &
business sustainability
Systematic management of customer to ensure constant
delivery of brand promise
Ensuring processes to deliver brand promise established, implemented
& maintained
Plan action to consistently meet/exceed standards or
brand promise
Maintain, control & improve processes towards improving
brand equity
Contribution to stakeholders, society & environment in
brand excellence
Mgt. Commitment & Capability
Financial Capability
Brand Management & Marketing
Operation Management
Quality & Standard
Social Responsibility
Management Best Practices
CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT BASED ON:
Conclusion
Vision
SME growth consistently outperformed overall
economy in last 7 years
SME development to change to higher gear to
accelerate SME growth amidst challenging environ.
Comprehensive SME Masterplan outlining bold
measures for quantum leap in GDP and to reach
developed nation by 2020
Focus on building capacity and enhancing
competitiveness of SMEs
Creating national, regional and global
champions
22
Targeted approach and shift towards outcome-
based approach in monitoring programmes
4