Slow Capacity Addition – Challenges and Way Forward

Anil Rawal, Reliance Infrastructure Ltd

Contents

• Capacity Addition – Generation

• Capacity Addition – Transmission

• Capacity Additoin - Distribution

• Power Dream gone wrong ??

• Way Forward

Capacity Addition Generation Capacity addition of 54,962 MW in XI

Plan, Jump of 51% in one plan Period, Private sector with a share of 42%

Currently at 232 GW 12th plan targets more than 88000

MW, more than 50% to be contributed by private sector.

Low interest level of investor, lenders and other stakeholdersIssues

Performance of Current InvestmentsPower shortages coexisting with stranded power assetsCoal based generation capacities rising, PLFs are fallingGrowth in peak demand is 27% in last 4 years compared to growth in gen by 55%

Fuel Shortage, domestic coal can not support the targets, import- uncertainties

Inadequate transmission capacity, not matching the generation capacities and load requirements.

long term PPA is a precondition for signing FSA Regulatory risk of cancellations/de-allocations of the some of the blocks

allocated to private sector looming large Approvals, clearances and Licenses 44ooo MWs of power plants stuck due to fuel or financial problems (BL

17th Dec ‘12). More than 15000 MW of plants stuck due to insufficient gas supply Financial health of Discoms, lenders not enthused

9th 10th 11th

105

132

200

Generation in GWs

Is 88000 MW addition target rightly placed sustainable?

Capacity Addition Transmission Capacity addition of 53000 Ckt Kms

in XI Plan, Jump of 27% in last plan Period,

Currently at 243,000 Ckt Kms 12th plan targets more than 109000

Ckt Kms line length and 2,70,000 MVA transformation capacity

Layout of about $ 35 Billion, about 45% from private sectorIssues Private interest dying down, bidders fallen from 20s to 3 or 4. SBDs not reflecting the changed realities after PoC mechanism -

uncertainities Assets not coming up with desired speed

Despite more than 230 GW installed power, peak demand of 141 Gw, peak deficit exists of about 9%, impacting 0.4% of GDP

In 2012-13, domestic power exchanges failed to execute deals of about worth Rs.1,350 Crores, amounting to 15% of total traded volume of power, due to transmission constraints. (Financial Express)

Under long term PPAs, lost 1.93 billion units of generation due to transmission capacity bottlenecks (Financial Express)

In resource rich states like Chattisgarh, Jindal and Sterlite plants could not despatch about 3000 MW (ET)

Transmission Constraint because of a Pocket of High Demand – SR, N2, N3

Transmission Constraint because of a Pocket of High Generation – W3, NER

9th 10th 11th

146

190

243

Capacity in '000 Ckt Kms

Transmission is the real bottleneck?

Capacity Addition

Distribution Per Capita consumption has risen

steadly over last many years. Despite problem in sector, rise in

per capita is sustained in recent past due to subsidies

An addition of 1.73 million circuit km of new lines at 33 kV, 11 kV and low voltage levels targeted in 12th plan. Issues Inner ring is not sustainable, ISTS capacities unutilized due to

lack of downstream evacuation Thumb rule - for every rupee invested in power generation, a

rupee should be invested in the Transmission and Distribution (T&D) sector.

Paying capacities and financial health vulnerable – politics vs economics

Funding by lenders not forthcoming 4 states have responded well to FRP, but many not coming

forth due to terms of conditions which enforce discipline AT & C losses still in range of 26% More than 20% payments delayed more than 90 days Power cuts and backup gensets galore, 40,000 MW of such

backup sets exist across India, eating into diesel subsidy of more than 5000 Crs - Ethiopia

631 671717 733

778 818917

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Per Capita Consumption (KwH)

Devil is in Distribution?

Power Dream Gone Wrong!!

Lack of Holistic Thinking

Over-enthusiasm by players and turn of events

Trust Deficit and Scepticism

Different cylinders firing non-synchronous • Reforms in Generation , Transmission and Distribution

• Approach of Center and State• Different segments of government not working coherently

• Clearances and approvals by ministries• Slow Decision making process

No level playing field

Private versus Public sector

Approach and Attitude

Skewed Risk Sharing and Flawed Documents

Operational, technological and Construction risk to borne by Private party

Legal, regulatory and demand risk to be borne by government

Documents being corrected

Way ForwardAddress the complete power supply chain, Competition and

opening up left to generation only leaving out the other parts of supply chain.

Regulatory and Statutory framework Bring in the Coal Regulator to reign in the monopoly and introduce

reforms Effective implementation of open access in transmission

multiple charges non-transparency regarding Available Transmission Capacity (ATC) Mis- use of Sec 11 orders by States Procedural complications

State level operations regulator to be made independent in line with POSOCO to make open access meaningful

State Utilities in problem due to poor managerial and operational practices compounded by irrational tariffs fixed by regulators, regulator to be independent.

Amendments in Electricity Act – address the changing needs

Clearances & redressal mechanism Delay in approvals / clearances as a ground for force majeure & relief Grant of an authorization under section 164 Central Projects Status to all ISTS and ISGS for Forest Clearance Redressal mechanism for unforeseen events Key clearances & authorizations to be in place before financial bid

Level Playing Field between private developers and state owned entities

Award of clearances like forest and environmental clearances Preferential Access to Confidential Information and ability to influence

bidding decisions Unfair Commercial Advantages for PSUs All projects through competitive bidding

Way ForwardCompetitive bidding framework

Amend SBDs to reflect the leanings – Transmission an example Benchmarking costs and tariffs while accepting bids Distribution Franchise model is emerging as a preferred model for PPP

Generation - Manage Current Capacities- Thousands of MWs of generation, More than 100 transmission projects

stuck -- Restore confidence Work on congestion management and implementation of OA in letter

and spirit Manage the counter-party credit risks pertaining to state-owned

distribution utilities continue to remain significantly high Need restructuring of loans for power sector projects Simplified exit norms to allow for asset churning

Transmission National Power beltway for transmission to enable nation wide plug and

play of evacuation system Integrating the states with the National Transmission System

Distribution Bring maximum states to financial discipline Build regulatory capacity Open Access in Distribution for 1 MW and above to be implemented Separate Carriage and Content Regulator be guided by Cost and less by political considerations on

tariff increase and loss reduction targets. Monitoring of FRP conditions to be tightened

Every body has to see the problem to resolve it

• Subgroup on Power Transmission - APP

• India Infrastructure Outlook 2011 by Fitch Ratings

• Power T&D Sector–The catch up game begins… CARE Ratings

• Power Transmission – the real bottleneck – FICCI

• The future of power analytics – presentation by IEE

• Executive Summary for the Month of November 2013 by CEA

• ICRA report on Power Sector – Sep 2012

• Ensuring electricity to All - Report by MS. BHAWNA GULATI, RESEARCH ASSOCIATE, JINDAL GLOBAL LAW SCHOOL

References and Acknowledgements

anil.rawal@relianceada.com

Certainly ! Thanks a lot