Slide 11.6- 1 Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.
Slide Slide 1 Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley. Lecture...
-
Upload
griselda-caldwell -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
1
Transcript of Slide Slide 1 Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley. Lecture...
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 1
Lecture Slides
Elementary Statistics Tenth Edition
and the Triola Statistics Series
by Mario F. Triola
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 2
Chapter 13Nonparametric Statistics
13-1Overview
13-2Sign Test
13-3Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs
13-4 Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test for Two Independent Samples
13-5 Kruskal-Wallis Test
13-6 Rank Correlation
13-7Runs Test for Randomness
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 3
Section 13-1 Overview
Created by Erin Hodgess, Houston, TexasRevised to accompany 10th Edition, Jim Zimmer, Chattanooga State,
Chattanooga, TN
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 4
Definitions
Parametric tests have requirements about the nature or shape of the populations involved.
Nonparametric tests do not require that samples come from populations with normal distributions or have any other particular distributions. Consequently, nonparametric tests are called distribution-free tests.
Overview
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 5
Advantages of Nonparametric Methods
1. Nonparametric methods can be applied to a wide variety of situations because they do not have the more rigid requirements of the corresponding parametric methods. In particular, nonparametric methods do not require normally distributed populations.
2. Unlike parametric methods, nonparametric methods can often be applied to categorical data, such as the genders of survey respondents.
3. Nonparametric methods usually involve simpler computations than the corresponding parametric methods and are therefore easier to understand and apply.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 6
Disadvantages of Nonparametric Methods
1. Nonparametric methods tend to waste information because exact numerical data are often reduced to a qualitative form.
2. Nonparametric tests are not as efficient as parametric tests, so with a nonparametric test we generally need stronger evidence (such as a larger sample or greater differences) before we reject a null hypothesis.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 7
Efficiency of Nonparametric Methods
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 8
Definitions
Data are sorted when they are arranged according to some criterion, such as smallest
to the largest or best to worst.
A rank is a number assigned to an individual sample item according to its order in the sorted list. The first item is assigned a
rank of 1, the second is assigned a rank of 2, and so on.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 9
Handling Ties in Ranks
Find the mean of the ranks involved and assign this mean rank to each of the tied items.
Sorted Data
4
5
5
5
10
11
12
12
Rank
1
3
3
3
5
6
7.5
7.5
Mean is 3.
Mean is 7.5.
Preliminary Ranking
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 10
Section 13-2 Sign Test
Created by Erin Hodgess, Houston, TexasRevised to accompany 10th Edition, Jim Zimmer, Chattanooga State,
Chattanooga, TN
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 11
Key Concept
The main objective of this section is to understand the sign test procedure,
which involves converting data values to plus and minus signs, then testing for disproportionately more of either sign.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 12
Definition
Sign Test The sign test is a nonparametric (distribution
free) test that uses plus and minus signs to test different claims, including:
1) Claims involving matched pairs of sample data;
2) Claims involving nominal data;
3) Claims about the median of a single population.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 13
Basic Concept of the Sign Test
The basic idea underlying the sign test is to analyze the frequencies
of the plus and minus signs to determine whether they are
significantly different.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 14
Figure 13-1 Sign Test Procedure
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 15
Figure 13-1 Sign Test Procedure
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 16
Figure 13-1 Sign Test Procedure
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 17
Requirements
1. The sample data have been randomly selected.
2. There is no requirement that the sample data come from a population with a particular distribution, such as a normal distribution.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 18
Notation for Sign Test
x = the number of times the less frequent sign occurs
n = the total number of positive and negative
signs combined
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 19
Test Statistic
For n 25: x (the number of times the less frequent sign occurs)
Critical valuesFor n 25, critical x values are in Table A-7.
For n > 25, critical z values are in Table A-2.
z =For n > 25: n
(x + 0.5) – n
2
2
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 20
Claims Involving Matched Pairs
When using the sign test with data that are matched pairs, we convert the raw data to plus and minus signs as follows:
1. Subtract each value of the second variable from the corresponding value of the first variable.
2. Record only the sign of the difference found in step 1.
Exclude ties: that is, any matched pairs in which both values are equal.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 21
Key Concept Underlying This Use of the Sign Test
If the two sets of data have equal medians, the number of positive
signs should be approximately equal to the number of negative signs.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 22
Example: Yields of Corn from Different Seeds
Use the data in Table 13-3 with a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that there is no difference between the yields from the regular and kiln-dried seed.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 23
H0: The median of the differences is equal to 0.
H1: The median of the differences is not equal to 0.
= 0.05
x = minimum(7, 4) = 4 (From Table 13-3, there are 7 negative signs and 4 positive signs.)
Critical value = 1 (From Table A-7 where n = 11 and = 0.05)
Example: Yields of Corn from Different Seeds
Use the data in Table 13-3 with a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that there is no difference between the yields from the regular and kiln-dried seed.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 24
H0: The median of the differences is equal to 0.
H1: The median of the differences is not equal to 0.
With a test statistic of x = 4 and a critical value of 1, we fail to reject the null hypothesis of no difference.
There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the median of the differences is equal to 0.
Example: Yields of Corn from Different Seeds
Use the data in Table 13-3 with a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that there is no difference between the yields from the regular and kiln-dried seed.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 25
Claims Involving Nominal Data
The nature of nominal data limits the calculations that are possible, but we can identify the proportion of the sample data
that belong to a particular category.
Then we can test claims about the corresponding population proportion p.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 26
Example: Gender SelectionOf the 325 babies born to parents using the XSORT method of gender selection, 295 were girls. Use the sign test and a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that this method of gender selection has no effect.
The procedures are for cases in which n > 25.
Note that the only requirement is that the sample data are randomly selected.
H0: p = 0.5 (the proportion of girls is 0.5)
H1: p 0.5
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 27
Example: Gender SelectionOf the 325 babies born to parents using the XSORT method of gender selection, 295 were girls. Use the sign test and a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that this method of gender selection has no effect.
Denoting girls by the positive sign (+) and boys by the negative sign (–), we have 295 positive signs and 30 negative signs.
Test statistic x = minimum(295, 30) = 30
The test involves two tails.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 28
Example: Gender SelectionOf the 325 babies born to parents using the XSORT method of gender selection, 295 were girls. Use the sign test and a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that this method of gender selection has no effect.
n(x + 0.5) –
z =n
2
2
(30 + 0.5) – z =
325
2
2325
= –14.64
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 29
Example: Gender SelectionOf the 325 babies born to parents using the XSORT method of gender selection, 295 were girls. Use the sign test and a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that this method of gender selection has no effect.
With = 0.05 in a two-tailed test, the critical values are z = 1.96.
The test statistic z = -14.64 is less than -1.96.
We reject the null hypothesis that p = 0.5.
There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the method of gender selection has no effect.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 30
Example: Gender SelectionOf the 325 babies born to parents using the XSORT method of gender selection, 295 were girls. Use the sign test and a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that this method of gender selection has no effect.
Figure 13.2
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 31
Claims About the Median of a Single Population
The negative and positive signs are based on the claimed value
of the median.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 32
Example: Body TemperatureUse the temperatures for 12:00 A.M. on Day 2 in Data Set 2 in Appendix B. Use the sign test to test the claim that the median is less than 98.6°F.
There are 68 subjects with temperatures below 98.6°F, 23 subjects with temperatures above 98.6°F, and 15 subjects with temperatures equal to 98.6°F.
H0: Median is equal to 98.6°F.
H1: Median is less than 98.6°F.
Since the claim is that the median is less than 98.6°F. the test involves only the left tail.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 33
Example: Body TemperatureUse the temperatures for 12:00 A.M. on Day 2 in Data Set 2 in Appendix B. Use the sign test to test the claim that the median is less than 98.6°F.
Discard the 15 zeros.
Use ( – ) to denote the 68 temperatures below 98.6°F, and use ( + ) to denote the 23 temperatures above 98.6°F.
So n = 91 and x = 23
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 34
Example: Body TemperatureUse the temperatures for 12:00 A.M. on Day 2 in Data Set 2 in Appendix B. Use the sign test to test the claim that the median is less than 98.6°F.
(x + 0.5) – z =
n
2
2n
(23 + 0.5) – z =
91
2
291
= – 4.61
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 35
Example: Body TemperatureUse the temperatures for 12:00 A.M. on Day 2 in Data Set 2 in Appendix B. Use the sign test to test the claim that the median is less than 98.6°F.
We use Table A-2 to get the critical z value of –1.645.
The test statistic of z = –4.61 falls into the critical region.
We reject the null hypothesis.
We support the claim that the median body temperature of healthy adults is less than 98.6°F.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 36
Example: Body TemperatureUse the temperatures for 12:00 A.M. on Day 2 in Data Set 2 in Appendix B. Use the sign test to test the claim that the median is less than 98.6°F.
Figure 13.3
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 37
Recap
In this section we have discussed:
Sign tests where data are assigned plus or minus signs and then tested to see if the number of plus and minus signs is equal.
Sign tests can be performed on claims involving:
Matched pairs
Nominal data
The median of a single population
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 38
Section 13-3 Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs
Created by Erin Hodgess, Houston, TexasRevised to accompany 10th Edition, Jim Zimmer, Chattanooga State,
Chattanooga, TN
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 39
Key Concept
The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test uses ranks of sample data consisting of matched pairs.
This test is used with a null hypothesis that the population of differences from the matched pairs has a median equal to zero.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 40
The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test is a nonparametric test that uses ranks of sample
data consisting of matched pairs.
It is used to test the null hypothesis that the population of differences has a median of zero.
Definition
H0: The matched pairs have differences that come from a population with a median equal to zero.
H1: The matched pairs have differences that come from a population with a nonzero median.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 41
1. The data consist of matched pairs that have been randomly selected.
2. The population of differences (found from the pairs of data) has a distribution that is approximately symmetric, meaning that the left half of its histogram is roughly a mirror image of its right half. (There is no requirement that the data have a normal distribution.)
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks TestRequirements
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 42
Notation
T = the smaller of the following two sums:
1. The sum of the absolute values of the negative ranks of the nonzero differences d
2. The sum of the positive ranks of the nonzero differences d
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 43
Test Statistic for the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test
for Matched Pairs
For n 30, the test statistic is T.
z =For n > 30, the test statistic is 4T – n(n + 1)
n(n +1) (2n +1)
24
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 44
Critical Values for the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test
for Matched Pairs
For n 30, the critical T value is found in Table A-8.
For n > 30, the critical z values are found in Table A-2.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 45
Procedure for Finding the Value of the Test Statistic
Step 1: For each pair of data, find the difference d by subtracting the second value from the first. Keep the signs, but discard any pairs for
which d = 0.
Step 2: Ignore the signs of the differences, then sort the differences from lowest to highest and replace the differences by the corresponding rank value. When differences have the same numerical value, assign to them the mean of the ranks involved in the tie.
Step 3: Attach to each rank the sign difference from which it came. That is, insert those signs that were ignored in step 2.
Step 4: Find the sum of the absolute values of the negative ranks. Also find the sum of the positive ranks.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 46
Step 5: Let T be the smaller of the two sums found in Step 4. Either sum could be used, but for a simplified procedure we arbitrarily select the smaller of the two sums.
Step 6: Let n be the number of pairs of data for which the
difference d is not 0.
Step 7: Determine the test statistic and critical values based on the sample size, as shown above.
Step 8: When forming the conclusion, reject the null hypothesis if the sample data lead to a test statistic that is in the critical region - that is, the test statistic is less than or equal to the critical value(s). Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Procedure for Finding the Value of the Test Statistic
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 47
Example: Does the Type of SeedAffect Corn Growth?
Use the data in Table 13-4 with the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and 0.05 significance level to test the claim that there is no difference between the yields from the regular and kiln-dried seed.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 48
Use the data in Table 13-4 with the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and 0.05 significance level to test the claim that there is no difference between the yields from the regular and kiln-dried seed.
Example: Does the Type of SeedAffect Corn Growth?
H0: There is no difference between the times of the first and second trials. H1: There is a difference between the times of the first and second trials.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 49
The ranks of differences in row four of the table are found by ranking the absolute differences, handling ties by assigning the mean of the ranks.
The signed ranks in row five of the table are found by attaching the sign of the differences to the ranks.
Example: Does the Type of SeedAffect Corn Growth?
The differences in row three of the table are found by computing the first time – second time.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 50
Example: Does the Type of SeedAffect Corn Growth?
Step 1: In Table 13- 4, the row of differences is obtained by computing this difference for each pair of data:
d = yield from regular seed – yield from kiln- dried seed
Step 2: Ignoring their signs, we rank the absolute differences from lowest to highest.
Step 3: The bottom row of Table 13- 4 is created by attaching to each rank the sign of the corresponding differences.
Calculate the Test Statistic
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 51
Example: Does the Type of SeedAffect Corn Growth?
Step 3 (cont.): If there really is no difference between the yields from the two types of seed (as in the null hypothesis), we expect the sum of the positive ranks to be approximately equal to the sum of the absolute values of the negative ranks.
Step 4: We now find the sum of the absolute values of the negative ranks, and we also find the sum of the positive ranks.
Step 3 (cont.):
Calculate the Test Statistic
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 52
Example: Does the Type of SeedAffect Corn Growth?
Sum of absolute values of negative ranks: 51 (from 10 + 9 + 8 + 6 + 5 + 11 + 2)
Sum of positive ranks: 15 (from 1 + 3 + 4 + 7)
Step 5: Letting T be the smaller of the two sums found in Step 4, we find that T = 15.
Step 6: Letting n be the number of pairs of data for which the difference d is not 0, we have n = 11.
Calculate the Test Statistic
Step 4 (cont.):
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 53
Example: Does the Type of SeedAffect Corn Growth?
Step 7: Because n = 11, we have n ≤ 30, so we use a test statistic of T = 15. From Table A- 8, the critical T = 11 (using n = 11 and = 0.05 in two tails).
Step 8: The test statistic T = 15 is not less than or equal to the critical value of 11, so we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
It appears that there is no difference between yields from regular seed and kiln-dried seed.
Step 7:
Calculate the Test Statistic
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 54
Recap
In this section we have discussed:
The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test which uses matched pairs.
The hypothesis is that the matched pairs have differences that come from a population with a median equal to zero.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 55
Section 13- 4 Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test
for Two Independent Samples
Created by Erin Hodgess, Houston, TexasRevised to accompany 10th Edition, Jim Zimmer, Chattanooga State,
Chattanooga, TN
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 56
Key Concept
The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test (Section 13-3) involves matched
pairs of data.
The Wilcoxon rank-sum test of this section involves two independent samples that are not related or somehow matched or paired.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 57
Definition
The Wilcoxon rank-sum test is a nonparametric test that uses ranks of sample data from two independent populations. It is used to test the null hypothesis that the two independent samples come from populations with equal medians.
H0: The two samples come from populations with equal medians.H1: The two samples come from populations with different medians.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 58
Basic Concept
If two samples are drawn from identical populations and the individual values are all ranked as one combined collection of values, then the high and low ranks should fall evenly between the two samples.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 59
Requirements
1. There are two independent samples of randomly selected data.
2. Each of the two samples has more than 10 values.
3. There is no requirement that the two populations have a normal distribution or any other particular distribution.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 60
n1 = size of Sample 1
n2 = size of Sample 2
R1 = sum of ranks for Sample 1
R2 = sum of ranks for Sample 2
R = same as R1 (sum of ranks for Sample 1)
R = mean of the sample R values that is expected when the two populations have equal medians
R = standard deviation of the sample R values that is expected with two populations having equal medians
Notation for the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 61
Test Statistic for the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test
R – Rz = R
R = n1 n2 (n1 + n2 + 1)
12
n1 (n1 + n2 + 1)
2=R
where
n1 = size of the sample from which the rank sum R is found
n2 = size of the other sample
R = sum of ranks of the sample with size n1
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 62
Critical values can be found in Table A-2 (because the test statistic is
based on the normal distribution).
Critical Values for the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 63
Procedure for Finding the Value of the Test Statistic
1. Temporarily combine the two samples into one big sample, then replace each sample value with its rank.
2. Find the sum of the ranks for either one of the two samples.
3. Calculate the value of the z test statistic as shown in the previous slide, where either sample can be used as ‘Sample 1’.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 64
The data in Table 13-5 are from Data Set 1 in Appendix B and use only the first 13 sample values for men and the first 12 sample values for women.
The numbers in parentheses are their ranks beginning with a rank of 1 assigned to the lowest value of 17.7.
R1 and R2 at the bottom denote the sum of ranks.
Example: BMI of Men and Women
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 65
Example: BMI of Men and Women
Use the data in Table 13-5 with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the median BMI of men is equal to the median BMI of women.
The requirements of having two independent and random samples and each having more than 10 values are met.
H0: Men and women have BMI values with equal medians
H1: Men and women have BMI values with medians that are not equal
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 66
Use the data in Table 13-5 with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the median BMI of men is equal to the median BMI of women.
Example: BMI of Men and Women
Procedures .
1. Rank all 25 BMI measurements combined. This is done in Table 13-5.
2. Find the sum of the ranks of either one of the samples. For men the sum of ranks is
R = 11.5 + 9 + 14 + … + 15.5 = 187
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 67
Example: BMI of Men and Women
Procedures (cont.) .3. Calculate the value of the z test statistic.
1 1 2( 1) 13(13 12 1)169
2 2R
n n n
1 2 1 2( 1) (13)(12)(13 12 1)18.385
12 12R
n n n n
187 1690.98
18.385R
R
Rz
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 68
Example: BMI of Men and Women
Use the data in Table 13-5 with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the median BMI of men is equal to the median BMI of women.
A large positive value of z would indicate that the higher ranks are found disproportionately in Sample 1, and a large negative value of z would indicate that Sample 1 had a disproportionate share of lower ranks.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 69
Example: BMI of Men and Women
Use the data in Table 13-5 with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the median BMI of men is equal to the median BMI of women.
We have a two tailed test (with = 0.05), so the critical values are 1.96 and –1.96.
The test statistic of 0.98 does not fall within the critical region, so we fail to reject the null hypothesis that men and women have BMI values with equal medians.
It appears that BMI values of men and women are basically the same.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 70
The preceding example used only 13 of the 40 sample BMI values for men listed in Data Set 1 in Appendix B, and it used only 12 of the 40 BMI values for women. Do the results change if we use all 40 sample values for both men and women?
The null and alternative hypotheses are the same.
Example: BMI of Men and Women
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 71
In the Minitab display below ETA1 and ETA2 denote the medians of the first and second samples, respectively.
The rank sum for men is W = 1727.5
The P-value is 0.3032 (or 0.3031 after adjustment for ties).
Example: BMI of Men and Women
Minitab
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 72
Because the P-value is greater than α = 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that men and women have BMI values with equal medians.
Example: BMI of Men and Women
Minitab
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 73
Recap
In this section we have discussed:
The Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test for Two Independent Samples.
It is used to test the null hypothesis that the two independent samples come from populations with equal medians.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 74
Section 13-5 Kruskal-Wallis Test
Created by Erin Hodgess, Houston, TexasRevised to accompany 10th Edition, Jim Zimmer, Chattanooga State,
Chattanooga, TN
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 75
Key Concept
This section introduces the Kruskal-Wallis test, which uses ranks of data from three or more independent samples to test the null hypothesis that the samples come from populations with equal medians.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 76
Definition .• The Kruskal-Wallis test (also called the H
test) is a nonparametric test that uses ranks of sample data from three or more independent populations.
• It is used to test the null hypothesis that the independent samples come from populations with the equal medians.
Kruskal-Wallis Test
H0: The samples come from populations with equal medians.
H1: The samples come from populations with medians that are not all equal.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 77
• We compute the test statistic H, which has a distribution that can be approximated by the chi-square (2 ) distribution as long as each sample has at least 5 observations.
• When we use the chi-square distribution in this context, the number of degrees of freedom is k – 1, where k is the number of samples.
Kruskal-Wallis Test
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 78
Kruskal-Wallis Test
1. We have at least three independent samples, all of which are randomly selected.
2. Each sample has at least 5 observations.
3. There is no requirement that the populations have a normal distribution or any other particular distribution.
Requirements
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 79
• N = total number of observations in all observations combined
• k = number of samples
• R1 = sum of ranks for Sample 1
• n1 = number of observations in Sample 1
• For Sample 2, the sum of ranks is R2 and the
number of observations is n2 , and similar notation is used for the other samples.
Kruskal-Wallis TestNotation
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 80
Kruskal-Wallis Test
Test Statistic
Critical Values1. Test is right-tailed.
2. df = k – 1 (Because the test statistic H can be approximated by the 2 distribution, use Table A- 4).
22 21 2
1 2
12... 3( 1)
( 1)k
k
RR RH N
N N n n n
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 81
Procedure for Finding the Value of the Test Statistic H
1 Temporarily combine all samples into one big sample and assign a rank to each sample value.
2. For each sample, find the sum of the ranks and find the sample size.
3. Calculate H by using the results of Step 2 and the notation and test statistic given on the preceding slide.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 82
Procedure for Finding the Value of the Test Statistic H
The test statistic H is basically a measure of the variance of the rank sums R1 , R2 , … , R k.
If the ranks are distributed evenly among the sample groups, then H should be a relatively small number.
If the samples are very different, then the ranks will be excessively low in some groups and high in others, with the net effect that H will be large.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 83
Example: Effects of Treatments on Poplar Tree Weights
Table 13-6 lists weights of poplar trees given different treatments. (Numbers in parentheses are ranks.)
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 84
Use the data in Table 13-6 with the Kruskal-Wallis test to test the claim that the four samples come from populations with equal medians.
Are requirements met?
There are three or more independent and random samples.
Each sample size is 5. (Requirement is at least 5.)
Example: Effects of Treatments on Poplar Tree Weights
H0: The populations of poplar tree weights from the four treatments have equal medians.
H1: The four population medians are not all equal.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 85
Use the data in Table 13-6 with the Kruskal-Wallis test to test the claim that the four samples come from populations with equal medians.
Example: Effects of Treatments on Poplar Tree Weights
The following statistics come from Table 13-6:
n1 = 5, n2 = 5, n3 = 5, n4 = 5
N = 20
R1 = 45, R2 = 37.5, R3 = 42.5, R4 = 85
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 86
Use the data in Table 13-6 with the Kruskal-Wallis test to test the claim that the four samples come from populations with equal medians.
Evaluate the test statistic. .
Example: Effects of Treatments on Poplar Tree Weights
22 21 2
1 2
12... 3( 1)
( 1)k
k
RR RH N
N N n n n
2 2 2245 37.5 8512 42.53(20 1)
20(20 1) 5 5 5 5
8.214
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 87
Use the data in Table 13-6 with the Kruskal-Wallis test to test the claim that the four samples come from populations with equal medians.
Find the critical value. .
Because each sample has at least five observations, the distribution of H is approximately a chi-square distribution.
Example: Effects of Treatments on Poplar Tree Weights
df = k – 1 = 4 – 1 = 3 α = 0.05
From Table A-4 the critical value = 7.815.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 88
Use the data in Table 13-6 with the Kruskal-Wallis test to test the claim that the four samples come from populations with equal medians.
Example: Effects of Treatments on Poplar Tree Weights
The test statistic 8.214 is in the critical region, so we reject the null hypothesis of equal medians.
At least one of the medians appears to be different from the others.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 89
Recap
In this section we have discussed:
The Kruskal-Wallis Test is the non-parametric equivalent of ANOVA.
It tests the hypothesis that three or more populations have equal means.
The populations do not have to be normally distributed.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 90
Section 13-6 Rank Correlation
Created by Erin Hodgess, Houston, TexasRevised to accompany 10th Edition, Jim Zimmer, Chattanooga State,
Chattanooga, TN
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 91
Key Concept
This section describes the nonparametric method of rank correlation, which uses paired data to test for an association between two variables.
In Chapter 10 we used paired sample data to compute values for the linear correlation coefficient r, but in this section we use ranks as a the basis for computing the rank correlation coefficient rs .
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 92
Rank CorrelationDefinition
The rank correlation test (or Spearman’s rank correlation test) is a non-parametric test that uses
ranks of sample data consisting of matched pairs.
It is used to test for an association between two variables, so the null and alternative hypotheses are
as follows (where ρs denotes the rank correlation coefficient for the entire population):
Ho: ρs = 0 (There is no correlation between the two variables.)
H1: ρs 0 (There is a correlation between the two variables.)
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 93
1. The nonparametric method of rank correlation can be used in a wider variety of circumstances than the parametric method of linear correlation. With rank correlation, we can analyze paired data that are ranks or can be converted to ranks.
2. Rank correlation can be used to detect some (not all) relationships that are not linear.
Advantages
Rank correlation has these advantages over the parametric methods discussed in Chapter 10:
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 94
Disadvantages
A disadvantage of rank correlation is its efficiency rating of 0.91, as described in Section 13-1.
This efficiency rating shows that with all other circumstances being equal, the nonparametric approach of rank correlation requires 100 pairs of sample data to achieve the same results as only 91 pairs of sample observations analyzed through parametric methods, assuming that the stricter requirements of the parametric approach are met.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 95
Figure 13-4 Rank Correlation for Testing H0: s = 0
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 96
Figure 13-4 Rank Correlation for Testing H0: s = 0
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 97
Requirements
1. The sample paired data have been randomly selected.
2. Unlike the parametric methods of Section 10-2, there is no requirement that the sample pairs of data have a bivariate normal distribution. There is no requirement of a normal distribution for any population.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 98
Notation
rs = rank correlation coefficient for sample paired data (rs is a sample statistic)
s = rank correlation coefficient for all the population data (s is a population parameter)
n = number of pairs of data
d = difference between ranks for the two values within a pair
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 99
Rank CorrelationTest Statistic
No ties: After converting the data in each sample to ranks, if there are no ties among ranks for either variable, the exact value of the test statistic can be calculated using this formula:
Ties: After converting the data in each sample to ranks, if either variable has ties among its ranks, the exact value of the test statistic rs can be found by using Formula 10-1 with the ranks:
2
2
61
( 1)s
dr
n n
2 2 2 2
( )( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )s
n xy x yr
n x x n y y
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 100
Critical values:
If n 30, critical values are found in Table A-9.
If n > 30, use Formula 13-1.
Rank Correlation
1s
zr
n
Formula 13-1
where the value of z corresponds to the significance level. (For example, if = 0.05, z – 1.96.)
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 101
Example: Rankings of CollegesUse the data in Table 13-7 to determine if there is a correlation between the student rankings and the rankings of the magazine.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 102
Example: Rankings of CollegesUse the data in Table 13-7 to determine if there is a correlation between the student rankings and the rankings of the magazine.
Since neither variable has ties in the ranks:
2
2 2
6 6(24)1 1
( 1) 8(8 1)s
dr
n n
1441 0.714
504
H0: s = 0 H1: s 0
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 103
Example: Rankings of CollegesUse the data in Table 13-7 to determine if there is a correlation between the student rankings and the rankings of the magazine.
H0: s = 0 H1: s 0
From Table A-9 the critical values are 0.738.
Because the test statistic of rs = 0.714 does not exceed the critical value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
There is not sufficient evidence to support a claim of a correlation between the rankings of the students and the magazine.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 104
Assume that the preceding example is expanded by including a total of 40 colleges and that the test statistic rs is found to be 0.300. If the significance level of = 0.05, what do you conclude about the correlation?
Example: Rankings of CollegesLarge Sample Case
Since n = 40 exceeds 30, we find the critical value from Formula 13-1
1.960.314
1 40 1s
zr
n
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 105
Assume that the preceding example is expanded by including a total of 40 colleges and that the test statistic rs is found to be 0.300. If the significance level of = 0.05, what do you conclude about the correlation?
Example: Rankings of CollegesLarge Sample Case
The test statistic of rs = 0.300 does not exceed the critical value of 0.314, so we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim of a correlation between students and the magazine.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 106
The data in Table 13- 8 are the numbers of games played and the last scores (in millions) of a Raiders of the Lost Ark pinball game.
We expect that there should be an association between the number of games played and the pinball score.
Example: Detecting a Nonlinear Pattern
H0: s = 0 H1: s 0
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 107
There are no ties among ranks of either list.
Example: Detecting a Nonlinear Pattern
2
2 2
6 6(6)1 1
( 1) 9(9 1)s
dr
n n
361 0.950
720
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 108
Example: Detecting a Nonlinear Pattern
Since n = 9 is less than 30, use Table A-9
Critical values are ± 0.700
The sample statistic 0.950 exceeds 0.700, so we conclude that there is significant evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no correlation.
There appears to be correlation between the number of games played and the score.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 109
Example: Detecting a Nonlinear Pattern
If the preceding example is done using the methods of Chapter 9, the linear correlation coefficient is r = 0.586.
This leads to the conclusion that there is not enough evidence to support the claim of a significant linear correlation, whereas the nonlinear test found that there was enough evidence.
The Excel scatter diagram shows that there is a non-linear relationship that the parametric method would not have detected.
Excel
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 110
Recap
In this section we have discussed:
Rank correlation which is the non-parametric equivalent of testing for correlation described in Chapter 10.
It uses ranks of matched pairs to test for association.
Sometimes rank correlation can detect non-linear correlation that the parametric test will not recognize.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 111
Section 13-7 Runs Test for Randomness
Created by Erin Hodgess, Houston, TexasRevised to accompany 10th Edition, Jim Zimmer, Chattanooga State,
Chattanooga, TN
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 112
Key Concept
This section introduces the runs test for randomness, which can be used to determine whether the sample data in a sequence are in a random order.
This test is based on sample data that have two characteristics, and it analyzes runs of those characteristics to determine whether the runs appear to result from some random process, or whether the runs suggest that the order of the data is not random.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 113
Runs Test for Randomness
Definitions
A run is a sequence of data having the same characteristic; the sequence is preceded and
followed by data with a different characteristic or by no data at all.
The runs test uses the number of runs in a sequence of sample data to test for randomness in the order of the data.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 114
Fundamental Principles of the Run Test
Reject randomness if the number of runs is very low or very high.Example: The sequence of genders FFFFFMMMMM is not random because it has only 2 runs, so the number of runs is very low.
Example: The sequence of genders FMFMFMFMFM is not random because there are 10 runs, which is very high.
It is important to note that the runs test for randomness is based on the order in which the data occur; it is not based on the frequency of the data.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 115
Figure 13-5 Procedure for Runs Test for Randomness
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 116
Figure 13-5 Procedure for Runs Test for Randomness
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 117
Requirements
1. The sample data are arranged according to some ordering scheme, such as the order in which the sample values were obtained.
2. Each data value can be categorized into one of two separate categories (such as male/female).
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 118
Notation
n1 = number of elements in the sequence that have one particular characteristic
(The characteristic chosen for n1 is arbitrary.)
n2 = number of elements in the sequence that have the other characteristic
G = number of runs
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 119
Test Statistic
Test statistic is the number of runs G
Critical Values
Critical values are found in Table A-10.
Runs Test for Randomness
For Small Samples (n1 ≤ 20 and n2 ≤ 20)
and = 0.05:
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 120
Decision criteria
Reject randomness if the number of runs G is:
• less than or equal to the smaller critical value found in Table A-10.
• or greater than or equal to the larger critical value found in Table A-10.
Runs Test for Randomness
For Small Samples (n1 ≤ 20 and n2 ≤ 20)
and = 0.05:
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 121
Test Statistic
G
G
Gz
1 2
1 2
21G
n n
n n
where
1 2 1 2 1 22
1 2 1 2
(2 )(2 )
( ) ( 1)G
n n n n n n
n n n n
and
For Small Samples (n1 ≤ 20 and n2 ≤ 20)
and = 0.05:
Runs Test for Randomness
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 122
Critical Values
Critical values of z: Use Table A-2.
Runs Test for Randomness
For Large Samples (n1 > 20 or n2 > 20) or ≠ 0.05:
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 123
Example: Small SampleGenders of Bears
Listed below are the genders of the first 10 bears from Data Set 6 in Appendix B. Use a 0.05 significance level to test for randomness in the sequence of genders.
M M M M F F M M F F
Separate the runs as shown below.
M M M M F F M M F F
2nd run 3rd run 4th run1st run
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 124
Example: Small SampleGenders of Bears
M M M M F F M M F F
2nd run 3rd run 4th run1st run
n1 = total number of males = 6
n2 = total number of females = 4
G = number of runs = 4
Because n1 ≤ 20 and n2 ≤ 20 and = 0.05, the test statistic is G = 4
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 125
Example: Small SampleGenders of Bears
M M M M F F M M F F
2nd run 3rd run 4th run1st run
From Table A-10, the critical values are 2 and 9.
Because G = 4 is not less than or equal to 2, nor is it greater than or equal to 9, we do not reject randomness.
It appears the sequence of genders is random.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 126
Refer to the rainfall amounts for Boston as listed in Data Set 10 in Appendix B. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that rain on Mondays is not random?
D D D D R D R D D R D D R D D D R D D R R R D D D D R D R D R R R D R D D D R D D D R D R D D R D D D R
H0: The sequence is random. H1: The sequence is not random.
n1 = number of Ds = 33 n2 = number or Rs = 19 G = number of runs = 30
Example: Large SampleBoston Rainfall on Mondays
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 127
Since n1 > 20, we must calculate z using the formulas:
Example: Large SampleBoston Rainfall on Mondays
1 2
1 2
2 2(33)(19)1 1 25.115
33 19G
n n
n n
1 2 1 2 1 22
1 2 1 2
(2 )(2 )
( ) ( 1)G
n n n n n n
n n n n
2
(2)(33)(19)[(2(33)(19) 33 19]3.306
(33 19) (33 19 1)
30 25.1151.48
3.306G
G
Gz
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 128
The critical values are z = -1.96 and 1.96.
The test statistic of z = 1.48 does not fall within the critical region, so we fail to reject the null hypothesis of randomness.
The given sequence does appear to be random.
Example: Large SampleBoston Rainfall on Mondays
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.SlideSlide 129
Recap
In this section we have discussed:
The runs test for randomness which can be used to determine whether the sample data in a sequence are in a random order.
We reject randomness if the number of runs is very low or very high.