Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay &...

94
Slide #1 Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates

Transcript of Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay &...

Page 1: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #1Slide #1©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

Teri Robertson

Workflow Analysis

©2006 Nan McKay & Associates

Page 2: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #2Slide #2©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING WORKFLOW ANALYSIS

Determine how my agency can operate• More efficiently

What existing processes are NVA (non-value added)?

Where is work duplicated, redundant, unnecessarily repetitive?

Page 3: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #3Slide #3©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING WORKFLOW ANALYSIS

Determine how my agency can operate• More effectively

How can we better ensure we meet HUD requirements?

Page 4: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #4Slide #4©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING WORKFLOW ANALYSIS

Determine what organizational structure / job assignments would work better for our PHA• Specialist model?• Generalist model?• Supervisor/worker ratio?

Page 5: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #5Slide #5©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING WORKFLOW ANALYSIS

Determine how to distribute assignments• Should supervisors also be responsible for

primary Quality Control activities in our PHA? Perform regular reviews?Perform SEMAP reviews?

Page 6: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #6Slide #6©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING WORKFLOW ANALYSIS

Where are we ‘out of step’ with requirements? Where are we doing great?

Page 7: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #7Slide #7©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING WORKFLOW ANALYSIS

How can we do better in meeting the needs of our clients, fulfilling HUD requirements, and keep our overall operation as simple as possible?

Page 8: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #8Slide #8©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

COMPONENTS OF A WORKFLOW ANALYSIS

1. Report Review2. Policy Review3. Document/Forms Review4. File Review5. Interviews with Key Staff6. Following Workflow (job shadowing)

Page 9: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #9Slide #9©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – REVIEW REPORTS

1. Report Review - Purpose Assess existing and past performance

issues Understand current / recent weaknesses

Page 10: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #10Slide #10©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – REVIEW REPORTS

1. Report Review – Documents to review RIM Reviews SEMAP Any independent auditor reports Internal QC reports PIC discrepancy reports

Page 11: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #11Slide #11©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – REVIEW REPORTS

1. Report Review – Pitfalls Failure to review objectively

• If the individual responsible for a stated weakness is reviewing the report, they may become defensive

• Information gathering is the goal

Page 12: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #12Slide #12©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – REVIEW REPORTS

1. Report Review – Pitfalls Discounting report findings Putting too much weight on report findings Only noting surface issues

• Look ‘beneath’ the issues• Note trends

Page 13: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #13Slide #13©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – REVIEW POLICY

2. Policy Review – Purpose Fresh eye approach Is appropriate guidance given to staff in key

areas?

Page 14: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #14Slide #14©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – REVIEW POLICY

2. Policy Review – Key areas to review Sections providing guidance on daily duties

• Rent calculation guidance How to annualize

• Earnings• Medical expenses• Child care expenses

Page 15: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #15Slide #15©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – REVIEW POLICY

2. Policy Review – How is this workflow analysis?

Can identify problems• Holes in policy• Inconsistencies• Conflicting guidance

Page 16: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #16Slide #16©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – REVIEW POLICY

2. Policy Review – How is this workflow analysis? Annualizing earnings

Individual conducting analysis needs to be current on what policy is for file review

Page 17: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #17Slide #17©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – REVIEW POLICY

2. Policy Review Annualizing earnings Medical expenses Child care

Identify log jams for staff in processing paperwork

Page 18: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #18Slide #18©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – REVIEW POLICY

2. Policy Review Annualizing earnings Verification requirements

Is policy consistent? Does it support staff efforts? Is it clear and logical?

Page 19: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #19Slide #19©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – REVIEW POLICY

2. Policy Review - Example PHA assets policy states that checking

account value is average 6 month’s balance To simplify process for staff, verification

policies allows current bank statement to be used (if original)

How do these two policies fit together?

Page 20: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #20Slide #20©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – REVIEW POLICY

2. Policy Review - Example• Do you conduct annual reexaminations

when a family moves? If yes, will not have to conduct annual until

move anniversary (be sure to code as 2) If no, will have to verify everything with the

move (be sure to code as 7)

Page 21: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #21Slide #21©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – REVIEW POLICY

2. Policy Review –

Keep alert, constantly analyzing, assessing, comparing

Page 22: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #22Slide #22©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FORMS REVIEW

3. Document/Forms Review - Purpose Look at forms with fresh eyes Are there any missing questions? Are questions complete? Clear? Do questions support the process?

Page 23: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #23Slide #23©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FORMS REVIEW

3. Document/Forms Review Recent forms issues observed by NMA:

• Asking if any adults attend school; not asking if they attend full time

• Asking about medical expenses, but not including room / headers for necessary details

Page 24: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #24Slide #24©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

4. File Review - Purpose Identify errors and error trends Identify unnecessary steps taken by staff Identify true file organization Identify how overstuffed files may be

Page 25: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #25Slide #25©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

4. File Review Approach objectively YOU are HUD, OIG, IA Be brutal!

Page 26: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #26Slide #26©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

4. File Review Look for unnecessary actions

• Obtaining primary documents annually (birth certificates, drivers licenses, Dec 214, SS cards)

• Sending letters advising owners they can ask for a rent increase

Page 27: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #27Slide #27©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in family files Files contain data more than three years old Duplicate documents in files

• Multiple copies of birth certificates, social security cards, Declaration 214

Page 28: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #28Slide #28©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in family files

Is file organization standardized? Are tabs used for key areas? Are all documents for annuals/interims kept together?

Page 29: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #29Slide #29©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in file reviews How easy/difficult is it for owners to

understand your unit types? • Would a ‘magic de-coder ring’ attached to the

RTA help?

Page 30: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #30Slide #30©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in file reviews Do utility responsibilities match on file

documents? • RTA • Lease • HAPC• Utility Schedule

Page 31: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #31Slide #31©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in file reviews How difficult is it for staff to determine which

utility allowance schedule to use? • How many utility allowance schedules do you use?• As unit types vary on HUD documents (RTA,

inspection, UA Schedule), are your schedules clearly labeled?

Page 32: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #32Slide #32©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in file reviews Do unit bedroom sizes match? Or, if

discrepancies exist, have they been resolved with an audit trail left behind?• RTA, Inspection, Utility Schedule

Do inspectors understand the importance of bedroom size and unit type?

Page 33: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #33Slide #33©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in file reviews Are effective dates of utility schedules clear? Are changes in utility schedules dated far enough

in advance to prevent conflict with completed reexams?

Is policy clear as to when new utility schedules are to be used? (Annual, interims)

Page 34: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #34Slide #34©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in file reviews What proof of unit ownership is in file?

• Copy of recorded deed vs. Real estate tax bill• Do you require a copy of an owner’s social security

card? Just what is needed for proof of unit

ownership?

Page 35: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #35Slide #35©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in file reviews Does staff follow verification hierarchy?

• UIV/EIV• 3rd party written• 3rd party oral• Review of documents• Family certification

Page 36: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #36Slide #36©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in file reviews How does staff handle / document being

unable to obtain verification in the hierarchy order? Is there an audit trail?• What slows them down? What will help?

Page 37: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #37Slide #37©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

File Reviews Identify how calculation and verification

policies help or hinder staff

Page 38: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #38Slide #38©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in file reviews Verification

• Employment income – (helpful tips) Does policy allow staff to use the higher of EIV/family

provided documents when there is not a substantial difference (more than $200 a month) between EIV and family provided data?

Page 39: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #39Slide #39©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in file reviews Verification

• Bank accounts – (helpful tips)Does policy allow staff to use an original bank

statement to verify bank account balances?

Page 40: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #40Slide #40©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in file reviews Verifications

• Review of documents – (helpful tips)Have you provided self-inking stamps to staff

‘Original document viewed and copied by _(name)_____ on __(date)____’ ?

Page 41: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #41Slide #41©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in file reviews Do you conduct interim reexaminations of

income when a family reports an increase in income?• Is there an income increase threshold? • Only the change must be verified; how is this

handled?

Page 42: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #42Slide #42©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in file reviews How are medical expenses handled?

• One of the toughest rent calculation challenges• CAN BE much easier than PHAs make it, IF

Declaration asks the right questions Policy supports requirements Staff is clear on how to proceed

Page 43: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #43Slide #43©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Medical expenses – Start with asking the right questions• What medical expenses do you expect to incur / pay

over the coming 12 months? Give examples of allowable expenses Provide fields to gather as much data as possible

• Type, how much, how often• How much is out of pocket/reimbursed?

Page 44: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #44Slide #44©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Medical expenses• Only declared items require verification• May need to resort to review of documents• Cannot just roll over previous year expenses

Page 45: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #45Slide #45©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in file reviews Are you requiring local forms that duplicate

HUD forms?• Family obligations form• Release forms

Page 46: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #46Slide #46©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in file reviews Are you requiring unnecessary forms for

family self-certification?• If all questions are properly asked, declaration

form serves as self-certification

Page 47: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #47Slide #47©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

Things to watch for in file reviews Are you unnecessarily requiring documents to

be notarized?• Typically, what is a notary attesting?

Page 48: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #48Slide #48©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

How does staff track / ‘tick’ • Activities• Verification receipt• Deadlines?

Page 49: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #49Slide #49©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – FILE REVIEW

What happens AFTER a file review?• How are errors communicated to staff?• How are errors/error trends tracked?• How is it ensured that errors are fixed?• How is it ensured that staff is coached on

errors?

Page 50: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #50Slide #50©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – STAFF INTERVIEWS

5. Staff interviews – Purpose Understand staff perception of workflow Identify staff perceived weaknesses and

strengths

Page 51: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #51Slide #51©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – STAFF INTERVIEWS

Plan aheadA. What process is being analyzed?

Intake? Annual Reexaminations? Inspections?

Page 52: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #52Slide #52©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – STAFF INTERVIEWS

Plan ahead• Will you analyze all actions, or only focused

elements? For example: Intake Application process Waiting list maintenance Selection from the waiting list Eligibility determination Briefings

Page 53: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #53Slide #53©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – STAFF INTERVIEWS

Plan ahead• If there is a specific area ‘hurting’, may want

to start there• If general analysis, may want to start at the

beginning

Page 54: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #54Slide #54©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – STAFF INTERVIEWS

Plan aheadB. Determine who will be interviewed

Key players in key positions Not everyone needs to be interviewed Enough employees to get the picture

Page 55: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #55Slide #55©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – STAFF INTERVIEWS

Plan aheadC. Have tools ready

Understand program requirements Be prepared to establish ground rules Have basic questions prepared How will you document the information?

Page 56: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #56Slide #56©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – STAFF INTERVIEWS

Plan aheadD. Schedule interviews

Calendar Conduct in a quiet space

• NEUTRAL ground• Allow enough time

Page 57: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #57Slide #57©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – STAFF INTERVIEWS

Conducting the Interview – establish ground rules• Explain purpose

This is only about gathering information in order to identify ways we can streamline the work process

I will also ask your opinion on how we can do things better

Page 58: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #58Slide #58©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – STAFF INTERVIEWS

Conducting the Interview – ground rules• Explain flow

I will be asking questions to understand how work is really processed

The only right answer is the real answer I will need to capture your answers, so ask

you to be patient while I do so

Page 59: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #59Slide #59©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – STAFF INTERVIEWS

Conducting the Interview - ground rules Explain flow

I may ask questions multiple times to ensure I understand

“I don’t know” is an acceptable answer

Page 60: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #60Slide #60©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – STAFF INTERVIEWS

Conducting the Interview • Ask questions in an objective, professional,

respectful manner• Listen listen listen• Watch your body language

Non judgmental

Page 61: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #61Slide #61©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – STAFF INTERVIEWS

Conducting the Interview • Query to ensure you understand• Do not add your opinions

This is about gathering information• Ask questions until you run out!

Page 62: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #62Slide #62©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – STAFF INTERVIEWS

Conducting the Interview • Document pertinent information• Make note of unanswered questions

Who else do I need to ask what?

Page 63: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #63Slide #63©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – STAFF INTERVIEWS

Conducting the Interview • At the end of the interview, ask

‘What else would you like to share?’ ‘How would you like to see things change?’ ‘What do you think is working well?’

Page 64: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #64Slide #64©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – JOB SHADOWING

6. Job shadowing – Purpose Learn what really happens Don’t be surprised when what you see is

different than what you heard

Page 65: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #65Slide #65©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – JOB SHADOWING

6. Job shadowing – Preparation is similar to that of interviews

Be prepared Schedule – advising all relevant staff they

may be involved Job shadowing means follow the work –

takes place at the work station

Page 66: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #66Slide #66©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – JOB SHADOWING

6. Job shadowing Full work analysis of a function (annual

reexaminations) means that you cannot observe the workflow all the way through on a given family

• An annual takes months to complete

Page 67: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #67Slide #67©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – JOB SHADOWING

6. Job shadowing So, use questions and observe work on files

at a given point in the process

Page 68: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #68Slide #68©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – JOB SHADOWING

Examples of questions Annual reexam process – specialist

• Where does your process begin? Give examples: You are planning for the April

reexaminations…where does your process begin? Be ready to ask clarifying questions to get things

started: Do you receive a printout of families to process? From whom?

Page 69: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #69Slide #69©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – JOB SHADOWING

Questioning: ‘Then what do you do?’ So, your supervisor gives you a print out of

families that you must process for reexamination, is that correct?…Then what do you do?

You go into your software and do what? Then what do you do? Then what happens? Who do you give that to? Who mails those out? How long does that take?

Page 70: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #70Slide #70©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – JOB SHADOWING

Questioning: ‘Connect the dots’

• Do not skip steps; make sure things ‘connect’

• Make notes of peripheral questions to ask later, but don’t break the train of thought

Page 71: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #71Slide #71©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – JOB SHADOWING

Questioning: Question down to specifics; to minutiae Ask about triggers, when necessary

• How long do you wait before sending out the 2nd 3rd party verification?

• How do you know to do that? What is your tickler system?

Page 72: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #72Slide #72©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – JOB SHADOWING

6. Job shadowing Whenever possible, observe work on files at

a given point in the process Observe interviews Walk from point to point with specialist as

necessary

Page 73: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #73Slide #73©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – JOB SHADOWING

6. Job shadowing Ask questions to the point responsibility

passes to another person….then go to that person, if possible

Page 74: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #74Slide #74©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – JOB SHADOWING

Have basic questions ready How will you document the information?

• See Handout• Ours is a sample only of what NMA uses to

gather information• Multi page document

Page 75: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #75Slide #75©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – JOB SHADOWING

Documenting information Word format Put together in ‘anticipated’ format, but easy

to cut and paste to move flow around

Page 76: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #76Slide #76©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

HANDOUT

Page 77: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #77Slide #77©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

HANDOUT

Page 78: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #78Slide #78©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS – The Hard Part

Review work flow process to eliminate unnecessary steps

Document work flow from the application process through termination

Review processing times

Page 79: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #79Slide #79©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS

Workflows are a map of processing steps conducted by various staff

Literally draw maps Visio is a good tool

Page 80: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #80Slide #80©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS

Page 81: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #81Slide #81©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS

Now that you have collected information, what do you do with it?

• Share information with appropriate people Involve staff wherever you can

• Search for ways to improve Ask for input, ideas

Page 82: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #82Slide #82©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS

Effective workflows increase efficiency among the various departments

• So bring departmental players into the discussions

• Make sure everyone is aware of everyone else’s goals

Page 83: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #83Slide #83©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORKFLOW ANALYSIS

Workflows must address the responsibilities of all disciplines to facilitate optimal program management and functioning

Page 84: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #84Slide #84©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORK FLOW – Things to consider

In redesigning workflow, take advantage of technological advancements

• Is it time to consider paperless?• What about call centers? • Software system should be loaded with

standard form letters

Page 85: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #85Slide #85©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORK FLOW – Things to consider

Today, all specialists should have computers, email

Are there enough printers? Fax machines? Is the phone system adequate?

Page 86: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #86Slide #86©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORK FLOW – Things to consider

Establish a web-site to provide access to:

• Frequently used forms• Special PHA announcements and bulletins• Frequently asked questions

Page 87: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #87Slide #87©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORK FLOW – Things to consider

Use of automated rent reasonableness technology (e.g., Gosection 8)

Take advantage of solutions available in the market

Page 88: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #88Slide #88©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORK FLOW – Things to consider

Review the lines of communications between program specialists

If a team approach is used make sure the teams communicate

Page 89: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #89Slide #89©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORK FLOW – Things to consider

Watch for customer service issues• When are customers required to come in?

Owners – multiple trips to the PHA Families – long waits at the office

• How soon are telephone calls returned?

Page 90: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #90Slide #90©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORK FLOW – Things to consider

How does staff track or ‘tick’ • Activities• Verification receipt• Deadlines?

Page 91: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #91Slide #91©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORK FLOW – Things to consider

How does management track results? Schedule activities?• Make the best use of available technology• Make your software work for you in generating

reports

Page 92: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #92Slide #92©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

WORK FLOW – Purpose

Workflows are essential for effective program management

Workflows assure all processing requirements are met

Page 93: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #93Slide #93©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

THE REST IS UP TO YOU

Questions and Answers

?

Page 94: Slide #1 © 2007 Nan McKay & Associates Teri Robertson Workflow Analysis © 2006 Nan McKay & Associates.

Slide #94Slide #94©2007 Nan McKay & Associates

PICK SIX & SAVE

Pick any six Lunch ‘n’ Learn sessions from our

Jan - March calendar for just $528!*

*PIH Alert subscriber price. Non-PIH Alert subscriber price is $688.