SLE-KEY™ RULE-OUT SERLOGIC TEST FOR SLE USING THE ... · Introduction SLE is associated with a...

1
Introduction SLE is associated with a large spectrum of autoantibodies, but currently there is no single adequate serologic diagnosis. Each autoantibody individually fails to discriminate with sufficient specificity and/or sensitivity SLE patients from healthy controls or from subjects afflicted with other autoimmune diseases. Currently a diagnosis of SLE is based on multiple criteria and can take years of concerned monitoring. SLE - KEY™ RULE - OUT SERLOGIC TEST FOR SLE USING THE IMMUNARRAY iCHIP ® I.R. Cohen 1 , C. Putterman 2 , N. Jordan 3 , K. Jakobi 4 , R. Sorek 4 , Y. Blumenstein 4 , S. Batty 5 (1) Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot , Israel, (2) Division of Rheumatology, Albert Einstein School of Medicine, (3) Montefiore Medical Center, New York City, NY, United States, (4) ImmunArray , Rehovot , Israel, (5) ImmunArray , Virginia , United States Method We collected serum samples from 246 SLE patients from four independent sources [Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Johns Hopkins University and Emory University] and compared them with sera of 252 healthy control samples independently sourced (clinical data is shown on tables 1,2). We tested these samples using the ImmunArray iCHIP® - a proprietary microarray that displays multiple antigens representing a range of SLE-associated biochemical pathways (figure 2). Training was performed on a subset of 150 SLE patients and 150 healthy controls using 4 independent classification methods: SVM, Logistic regression, QDA and LDA. Verification and validation were performed on additional sets of 50 SLE patients and 50 healthy control samples each. Results Based on comparing the ROC curves of the four models (figure 3) LDA was selected as it displayed the best balance between sensitivity and specificity. LDA classification method differentiated SLE patients from healthy subjects with a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 75% (table 3) using a selected subset of six auto-antigens. The informative antigens represented some known to be associated with SLE, as well as some proprietary antigens not previously known to have an association with the disease. SLE-Key TM test out put is presented in figures 4,5 and 6. Aim We developed the previously described iCHIP® (1) (figure 1) as an effective SLE rule-out diagnostic test by profiling with an antigen microarray multiple, distinct autoantibody reactivities in the sera of SLE patients compared to healthy controls and by using informatics analysis to rule out a diagnosis of SLE. An initial set of 200 antigens associated with SLE was selected from the literature bolstered with sets of proprietary markers developed by ImmunArray (figure 2). Here we report verification and validation of our SLE-Key TM Rule-Out Serologic Test. Figure 3: ROC curves for the four classification models on validation data set, indicating test performance at selected threshold (left panel). LDA model validation probability distribution (right panel). Table 3 : The LDA Validation performance Validation LDA Area under Curve (AUC) 0.94 Sensitivity 94% Specificity 75% Accuracy 84% Positive Predictive Value (PPV) 78% Negative Predictive Value (NPV) 93% Figure 2: ImmunArray’s SLE iCHIP ® antigen biochemical pathways representation Table 1 : Samples demographics Table 2 : Patient samples clinical data (n=498) SLE Patients (n=246) Healthy Controls (n=252) Age in years Mean (±SD) 34.8 (11.4) 36.8 (12.0) Race category African: Number (%) 130 (53.0) 113 (44.8) White non Hispanic: Number (%) 53 (21.5) 74 (29.4) Indian/Asian/middle eastern: Number (%) 5 (2.0) 20 (7.9) White Hispanic: Number (%) 49 (20.0) 42 (16.7) Other: Number (%) 9 (3.6) 3 (1.2) (n=246) SLE Patients ACR Range 4-11 Mean (±SD) 5.24 (1.2) SLEDAI score Range 0-25 Mean (±SD) 4.11 (4.8) Time post Diagnosis in years Mean (±SD) 1.00 (1) SAT 0590 Conclusion The SLE-Key TM Rule Out serologic test can be used as a decision support tool for physicians in ruling out a diagnosis of SLE with a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 75% and NPV of 93%. Work comparing this testing performance directly to standard serologic testing is ongoing. Figure 4: SLE-Key TM test output. LDA validation probability distribution. LDA threshold is shown as dotted horizontal purple line. The patient SLE- Key TM score is represented as a red “X”. Figure 5: LDA classifier antigens individual intensity histograms Figure 6: SLE associated antigens individual intensity histograms References (1) Fattal, I, et al; Immunology 2010, 130, 337-343 Figure 1: iCHIP ® - ImmunArray proprietary antigen micro-array platform Acknowledgements: The authors wish to acknowledge the invaluable contributions of Ornit Cohen-Gindi, Miriam Lerner, Naama Shefer, Ilana Gilkaite, Angela Turner and Nazanin Mishrani

Transcript of SLE-KEY™ RULE-OUT SERLOGIC TEST FOR SLE USING THE ... · Introduction SLE is associated with a...

Page 1: SLE-KEY™ RULE-OUT SERLOGIC TEST FOR SLE USING THE ... · Introduction SLE is associated with a large spectrum of autoantibodies, but currently there is no single adequate serologic

IntroductionSLE is associated with a large spectrum of autoantibodies, but currently there is no single adequate serologic diagnosis. Each autoantibody individually fails to discriminate with sufficient specificity and/or sensitivity SLE patients from healthy controls or from subjects afflicted with other autoimmune diseases. Currently a diagnosis of SLE is based on multiple criteria and can take years of concerned monitoring.

SLE-KEY™ RULE-OUT SERLOGIC TEST FOR SLE USING THE IMMUNARRAY iCHIP®

I.R. Cohen 1, C. Putterman 2, N. Jordan 3, K. Jakobi 4, R. Sorek 4, Y. Blumenstein 4, S. Batty 5

(1) Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel, (2) Division of Rheumatology, Albert Einstein School of Medicine, (3) Montefiore

Medical Center, New York City, NY, United States, (4) ImmunArray, Rehovot, Israel, (5) ImmunArray, Virginia, United States

MethodWe collected serum samples from 246 SLE patients from four independent sources [Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Johns Hopkins University and Emory University] and compared them with sera of 252 healthy control samples independently sourced (clinical data is shown on tables 1,2). We tested these samples using the ImmunArray iCHIP® - a proprietary microarray that displays multiple antigens representing a range of SLE-associated biochemical pathways (figure 2). Training was performed on a subset of 150 SLE patients and 150 healthy controls using 4 independent classification methods: SVM, Logistic regression, QDA and LDA. Verification and validation were performed on additional sets of 50 SLE patients and 50 healthy control samples each.

ResultsBased on comparing the ROC curves of the four models (figure 3) LDA was selected as it displayed the best balance between sensitivity and specificity. LDA classification method differentiated SLE patients from healthy subjects with a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 75% (table 3) using a selected subset of six auto-antigens. The informative antigens represented some known to be associated with SLE, as well as some proprietary antigens not previously known to have an association with the disease. SLE-KeyTM test out put is presented in figures 4,5 and 6.

AimWe developed the previously described iCHIP®(1) (figure 1) as an effective SLE rule-out diagnostic test by profiling with an antigen microarray multiple, distinct autoantibody reactivities in the sera of SLE patients compared to healthy controls and by using informatics analysis to rule out a diagnosis of SLE. An initial set of 200 antigens associated with SLE was selected from the literature bolstered with sets of proprietary markers developed by ImmunArray (figure 2). Here we report verification and validation of our SLE-KeyTM Rule-Out Serologic Test.

Figure 3: ROC curves for the four classification models on validation data set,

indicating test performance at selected threshold (left panel). LDA model

validation probability distribution (right panel).

Table 3 : The LDA Validation performance

Validation LDA

Area under Curve (AUC) 0.94

Sensitivity 94%

Specificity 75%

Accuracy 84%

Positive Predictive Value (PPV) 78%

Negative Predictive Value (NPV) 93%

Figure 2: ImmunArray’s SLE iCHIP® antigen biochemical pathways representation

Table 1 : Samples demographics Table 2 : Patient samples clinical data

(n=498)SLE Patients

(n=246)Healthy Controls

(n=252)

Age in years Mean (±SD)

34.8 (11.4) 36.8 (12.0)

Race category

African: Number (%) 130 (53.0) 113 (44.8)

White non Hispanic: Number (%) 53 (21.5) 74 (29.4)

Indian/Asian/middle eastern: Number (%) 5 (2.0) 20 (7.9)

White Hispanic: Number (%) 49 (20.0) 42 (16.7)

Other: Number (%) 9 (3.6) 3 (1.2)

(n=246) SLE Patients

ACR

Range 4-11Mean (±SD) 5.24 (1.2)

SLEDAI score

Range 0-25

Mean (±SD) 4.11 (4.8)

Time post Diagnosis in years

Mean (±SD) 1.00 (1)

SAT0590

Conclusion

The SLE-KeyTM Rule Out serologic test can be used as a decision support tool for physicians in ruling

out a diagnosis of SLE with a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 75% and NPV of 93%. Work

comparing this testing performance directly to standard serologic testing is ongoing.

Figure 4: SLE-KeyTM test

output. LDA validation

probability distribution.

LDA threshold is shown as

dotted horizontal purple

line. The patient SLE-

KeyTM score is represented

as a red “X”.

Figure 5: LDA classifier antigens individual intensity histograms

Figure 6: SLE associated antigens individual intensity histograms

References (1) Fattal, I, et al; Immunology 2010, 130, 337-343

Figure 1: iCHIP® - ImmunArray proprietary antigen micro-array platform

Acknowledgements: The authors wish to acknowledge the invaluable contributions of Ornit Cohen-Gindi, Miriam Lerner, Naama Shefer, Ilana Gilkaite, Angela Turner and Nazanin Mishrani