sld07

download sld07

of 32

Transcript of sld07

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    1/32

    Variable Costing:A Tool for Management

    Chapter

    7

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    2/32

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    3/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-3

    LEARNING OBJECTIVES

    4. Explainthe effect of changes in production on

    the net income reported under both variableand absorption costing.

    5. Explainthe advantages and limitations of both

    the variable and absorption costing methods.6. Explainhow the use of JIT reduces the

    difference in net income reported under the

    variable and absorption costing methods.

    After studying this chapter, you should be able to:

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    4/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-4

    Overview of Absorption and

    Variable Costing

    The only cost of driving my caron a 200 mile trip today is$12 for gasoline.

    VariableCosting

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    5/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-5

    Overview of Absorption and

    Variable Costing

    No! You must consider these costs too!

    AbsorptionCosting

    Cost Per month Per day

    Car payment 300.00$ 10.00$

    Insurance 60.00 2.00

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    6/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-6

    Overview of Absorption and

    Variable Costing

    Your wrong. I have the carpayment and the

    insurance payment even ifI do not make the trip.

    VariableCosting

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    7/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-7

    Overview of Absorption and

    Variable Costing

    Whos right?How should we treat the carpayment and the insurance?

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    8/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-8

    Absorption

    Costing

    Variable

    Costing

    Direct materials

    Direct labour Product costs

    Product costs Variable mfg. overhead

    Fixed mfg. overhead

    Period costs

    Period costs Selling & admin. exp.

    Overview of Absorption and

    Variable Costing

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    9/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-9

    Lets put some numbers to theissue and see if it will

    sharpen our understanding.

    Overview of Absorption and

    Variable Costing

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    10/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-10

    Harvey Co. produces a single product withthe following information available:

    Number of units produced annually 25,000

    Variable costs per unit:

    Direct materials, direct labour,and variable mfg. overhead 10$

    Selling & administrative expenses 3$

    Fixed costs per year:Manufacturing overhead 150,000$

    Selling & administrative expenses 100,000$

    Unit Cost Computations

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    11/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-11

    Unit product costis determined as follows:

    Selling and administrative expenses arealways treated as period expensesand

    deducted from revenue.

    Absorption

    Costing

    Variable

    Costing

    Direct materials, direct labour,

    and variable mfg. overhead 10$ 10$Fixed mfg. overhead

    ($150,000 25,000 units) 6 -

    Unit product cost 16$ 10$

    Unit Cost Computations

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    12/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-12

    Absorption CostingSales (20,000 $30) 600,000$

    Less cost of goods sold:

    Beginning inventory -$Add COGM (25,000 $16) 400,000

    Goods availa ble for sale 400,000

    Ending inventory (5,000 $16) 80,000 320,000

    Gross margin 280,000

    Less se lling & admin. e xp. Variable

    Fixed

    Net income

    Harvey Co. had no beginning inventory, produced

    25,000units and sold 20,000units this year.

    Income Comparison of Absorption

    and Variable Costing

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    13/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-13

    Harvey Co. had no beginning inventory, produced

    25,000units and sold 20,000units this year.Absorption Costing

    Sales (20,000 $30) 600,000$

    Less cost of goods sold:

    Beginning inventory -$Add COGM (25,000 $16) 400,000

    Goods availa ble for sale 400,000

    Ending inventory (5,000 $16) 80,000 320,000

    Gross margin 280,000

    Less se lling & admin. e xp. Varia ble (20,000 $3) 60,000$

    Fixed 100,000 160,000

    Net income 120,000$

    Income Comparison of Absorption

    and Variable Costing

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    14/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-14

    Variable CostingSales (20,000 $30) 600,000$

    Less variable expenses:

    Beginning inventory -$

    Add COGM (25,000 $10) 250,000

    Goods available for sale 250,000Ending inventory (5,000 $10) 50,000

    Variable cost of goods sold 200,000

    Variable selling & administrative

    expenses (20,000 $3) 60,000 260,000

    Contribution margin 340,000Less fixed expenses:

    Manufacturing overhead 150,000$

    Selling & administrative expenses 100,000 250,000

    Net income 90,000$

    Now lets look at variable costing by Harvey Co.

    Income Comparison of Absorption

    and Variable Costing

    Variablecostsonly.

    All fixed

    manufacturingoverhead isexpensed.

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    15/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-15

    Cost of

    Goods

    Sold

    Ending

    Inventory

    Period

    Expense Total

    Absorption costing

    Variable mfg. costs 200,000$ 50,000$Fixed mfg. costs 120,000 30,000

    320,000$ 80,000$

    Variable costing

    Variable mfg. costs 200,000$ 50,000$

    Fixed mfg. costs - -

    200,000$ 50,000$

    Lets compare the methods.

    Income Comparison of Absorption

    and Variable Costing

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    16/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-16

    Cost of

    Goods

    Sold

    Ending

    Inventory

    Period

    Expense Total

    Absorption costing

    Variable mfg. costs 200,000$ 50,000$ -$ 250,000$Fixed mfg. costs 120,000 30,000 - 150,000

    320,000$ 80,000$ -$ 400,000$

    Variable costing

    Variable mfg. costs 200,000$ 50,000$ -$ 250,000$

    Fixed mfg. costs - - 150,000 150,000

    200,000$ 50,000$ 150,000$ 400,000$

    Lets compare the methods.

    Income Comparison of Absorption

    and Variable Costing

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    17/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-17

    Reconciliation

    Variable costing net income 90,000$

    Add: Fixed mfg. overhead costs

    deferred in inventory

    (5,000 units $6 per unit) 30,000

    Absorption costing net income 120,000$

    Fixed mfg. overhead $150,000Units produced 25,000

    = = $6.00 per unit

    We can reconcile the difference between

    absorption and variable income as follows:

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    18/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-18

    Extending the Example

    Lets look at thesecond yearof operations

    for HarveyCompany.

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    19/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-19

    Harvey Co. Year 2 In its second year of operations, Harvey Co.

    started with an inventory of 5,000 units,

    produced 25,000units and sold 30,000units.

    Number of units produced annually 25,000

    Variable costs per unit:

    Direct materials, direct laborvariable mfg. overhead 10$

    Selling & administrative

    expenses 3$

    Fixed costs per year:Manufacturing overhead 150,000$

    Selling & administrative

    expenses 100,000$

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    20/32

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    21/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-21

    Harvey Co. Year 2

    Now lets look at Harveys income statement

    assuming absorption costingis used.

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    22/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-22

    Absorption CostingSales (30,000 $30) 900,000$

    Less cost of goods sold: Beg. inventory (5,000 $16) 80,000$

    Add COGM (25,000 $16) 400,000

    Goods available for sale 480,000

    Ending inventory - 480,000

    Gross margin 420,000

    Less selling & admin. exp.

    Variable (30,000 $3) 90,000$

    Fixed 100,000 190,000

    Net income 230,000$

    Harvey Co. Year 2

    These are the 25,000 unitsproduced in the current period.

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    23/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-23

    Harvey Co. Year 2

    Next, well look at Harveys income statement

    assuming is used.

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    24/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-24

    Variable CostingSales (30,000 $30) 900,000$

    Less variable expenses: Beg. inventory (5,000 $10) 50,000$

    Add COGM (25,000 $10) 250,000

    Goods available for sale 300,000

    Ending inventory -

    Variable cost of goods sold 300,000

    Variable selling & administrative

    expenses (30,000 $3) 90,000 390,000

    Contribution margin 510,000

    Less fixed expenses: Manufacturing overhead 150,000$

    Selling & administrative expenses 100,000 250,000

    Net income 260,000$

    Harvey Co. Year 2Variablecostsonly.

    All fixedmanufacturing

    overhead isexpensed.

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    25/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-25

    Summary

    Income Comparison

    Costing Method 1st Period 2nd Period Total

    Absorption 120,000$ 230,000$ 350,000$

    Variable 90,000 260,000 350,000

  • 8/13/2019 sld07

    26/32

    McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited., 2001

    7-26

    SummaryRelation between Effect Rela tion betweenproduction on variable and

    Year and sa les iniventory absorption income

    Inventory Absorption

    1st Production > Sales increases by >

    year 25,000 > 20,000 5,000 units. Variable

    Inventory Absorption2nd Production < Sales decreases