©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy...

17
1 ©SJA 2007 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell Stack Temperature

Transcript of ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy...

Page 1: ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell.

1

©SJA 2007

Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær

Aalborg UniversityInstitute of Energy Technology

Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell Stack Temperature

Page 2: ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell.

2

©SJA 2007

Presentation outline

∙ HTPEM features∙ Experimental fuel cell system setup∙ Previous work

▫ Stack temperature profile identification

∙ Governing equations▫ Energy balance▫ Fuel cell power input▫ Convection▫ Conduction

∙ Model definitions∙ Model assumptions∙ HTPEM FC stack temperature control

▫ Current feedforward▫ PI controller

∙ Model validation▫ Heating▫ Operation▫ Pulsating air flow

Page 3: ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell.

3

©SJA 2007

HTPEM PBI(H3PO4)-membrane features

Operating conditions▫ FC operating conditions 120-200oC, preferred range (160-180oC)▫ Allowable CO content 1-3% (10000-30000 ppm)▫ No humidification of anode- and cathode flows▫ Fast response to load changes due to high temperatures (even with CO)

Advantages▫ No humidification of cathode or anode => Very simple FC system and stack design▫ No liquid water should be present in FC membranes => Simple stack design▫ Large CO-tolerance (1-3%), LTPEM is typically 10-100ppm▫ Possible system integration with simple reformer, due to high CO tolerance▫ Storing hydrogen as a liquid hydrocarbon => methanol, ethanol etc.▫ Avoiding and extra cooling circuit, by using extra cathode air

Disadvantages (Challenges)▫ Lower cell voltage = Lower efficiency (not as low as DMFC though)▫ Start-up time is often long because of high operating temperatures (min 100oC) to avoid water condensation.▫ High demands for materials at these elevated temperatures

Page 4: ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell.

4

©SJA 2007

Performance of HTPEM fuel cell

©SJA 2007

Page 5: ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell.

5

©SJA 2007

HTPEM FC System- pure hydrogen

Page 6: ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell.

6

©SJA 2007

Previous work – Initial experimental results

Stack temperature profile identification

Page 7: ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell.

7

©SJA 2007

Fuel cell stack energy balance

Energy balance :

Fuel cell heat input :

External heat input :

Forced Convection :

Heat Conduction :

Natural Convection :

PWMtotalexternalin DPQ ,

Page 8: ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell.

8

©SJA 2007

Manifold and gas channel temperature

T

xmanifold

endmiddle

front

Tmanifold,in,front

Tmanifold,in,middle

Tmanifold,in,end

T

xchannel

Tmanifold,in,front + Tmanifold,in,middleTchannel,in,front =

2

Texit,channel,middleTexit,channel,front Texit,channel,end

Page 9: ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell.

9

©SJA 2007

Model assumptions

∙ Quasi-steady-state : Constant surface temperature.∙ Fuel cell stack modelled as three lumps.

∙ Constant Urev of 1.2V.

∙ Fuel cell heat generation calculated at steady-state.∙ No axial and in-plane heat conduction between lumps.∙ Additional heating in inlet plate and BPP junction modelled as small

constant gain.∙ Heat transfer in the MEA is neglected.∙ Hydrogen heating and cooling effects neglected.∙ Constant air mass flow in channels, consumption subtracted.∙ Small natural convection term added.

Page 10: ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell.

10

©SJA 2007

HTPEM FC stack temperature control

SystemController

TmeasuredTreference

Ublower

Ireference

I->mAir

FC air flow – PI controller with Current feedforward

Stack temperature 160-180 oC, what Tmeasured should be used?

+

+-

+

Page 11: ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell.

11

©SJA 2007

Typical stack temperature control case

Middle temperature controlled End temperature controlled

Initial heating followed by 20 A load step.

Page 12: ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell.

12

©SJA 2007

Model validation - Electrical heating

Experiment :

400 W heating

Simulation :

350 W heating

Page 13: ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell.

13

©SJA 2007

Model validation – Constant current

Experiment :

20 A load

Simulation :

1500 W heating,

20 A load

Page 14: ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell.

14

©SJA 2007

Model validation – Pulsating air flow

Operation :

small current ramp,

20 A load

air flow pulsing

no controls

Page 15: ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell.

15

©SJA 2007

Example of experimental data

Page 16: ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell.

16

©SJA 2007

Conclusions and future work

Conclusions∙ Developed model can with good agreement predict fuel cell stack temperature

dynamics.∙ Developed model can within acceptable ranges predict the steady-state values

of the fuel cell stack temperatures.∙ The modelled exhaust temperature must be improved for use as a direct

control feedback.∙ Minimization of measured temperatures should be examnied using model

based control.Furture Work∙ Manifold and channel temperature dynamics∙ Air flow subtraction along the channel∙ Discrete (at cell level) model∙ Model validation on 1 kW HTPEM stack with other geometry

Page 17: ©SJA 2007 1 Søren Juhl Andreasen and Søren Knudsen Kær Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology Dynamic Model of High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell.

17

©SJA 2007

Thank you for your attention!