Sizes
-
Upload
ulysses-mccarthy -
Category
Documents
-
view
14 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Sizes
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s 2
Coulomb Fields of Finite Charge Distributions
|e|Z
e
z
r
r
r r r
r arbitrary nuclear charge distribution
with normalization 3 1d r r
Coulomb interaction
3( )e r
V r e dZ rr r
Expansion of 1
r r for r r
1 / 2 1 / 21 2 2 2
1 2
2 cos
11 ( 2cos )
r r r r r r rr
r rr r r
1 2 2
3
1 1 31 1
2 2 41 3 5
.....2 4 6
x x x
x
«1
for |x|«1:
221
0
1 11 cos 3cos 1 ...
21
(cos )r r r
r r Pr rr r r
20 1 1
11, cos cos , cos 3cos 1
2Legendre Polynomials P P P
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s 3
Multipole Expansion of Coulomb Interaction
|e|Z
e
z
r
r
r r r
3
2 2
2 23
3
3
3
2
3
2
2
1
cos
13
( )
...
c
.
o2
.
s 1
.
er r
e r d
e r
r r
er
V r e d rr r
e e Z
e e Z
e e Z
Z
Zd r r
Zd r r
Zd r r Q
r r
Monopoleℓ = 0
Dipole ℓ = 1 Quadrupole ℓ =2
Point Charges
Nuclear distribution
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s 4
A Quantal Symmetry
symmetric nuclear shape symmetric
invariance of Hamiltonian against space inversion
r
( ) (
1,
)
, 0
1E E E E
E
H r H r Parity Operator r r
H simultaneous eigen functions
evenH E
odd
3
:
( ) ( )(cos ) (cos )n nn n nel
Electrostatic multipole moments of r
M dr P r Pr r r
both even or odd
n even = +1n odd = -1
0elnM for n odd
If strong nuclear interactions parity conserving
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s 5
Restrictions on Nuclear Field
Expt: No nucleus with non-zero electrostatic dipole moment
Consequences for nuclear Hamiltonian (assume some average mean field Ui for each nucleon i):
2
11
2 22 2 2 2
2 2
11
1 11
ˆˆ ( ,...., ; ...)2
ˆ ˆ, 0
ˆˆ ˆ , 0( )
ˆ( ,...., ; ...), 0
( ,...., ; ...) ( , ....,
Ai
i Ai i
i i
A
i Ai
A
i A ii
pH U r r parity conserving
m
H
Since p px x
and U r r
U r r U r
1
11
; ...)
(| | , ....,| | ; ...)
A
Ai
A
i Ai
r
U r r
Average mean field for nucleons conserves inversion invariant, e.g., central potential
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s 6
Neutron Electric Dipole Moment
- + B 2
22
2n
n
n
n
n
nIntera
d
Bction d
B E
EB
E
d
qn =0, possible small dn ≠0. CP and P violation could explain matter/antimatter asymmetry
Measure NMR HF splitting for E B
Transition energies=4dnE
s
nd
B
E
B=0.1mG, tune with Bosc B. E = 1MV/m = 30Hz spin-flipof ultra-cold (kT~mK)EEkinkin=10=10-7-7eV, eV, =670Å =670Åneutrons in mgn.bottleguided in reflecting Ni tubes
PNPI (1996): dn < (2.6 ± 4.0 ±1.6)·10-26 e·cm
ILL-Sussex-RAL (1999): dn < (-1.0 ± 3.6)·10-26 e·cm
dn experimental sensitivity
From size of neutron (r0≈ 1.2fm): dn 10-15 e·m.So far, only upper limits for dn
Experimental Results for dn
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
7
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s 8
Intrinsic Quadrupole Moment
Consider axially symmetric nuclei (for simplicity), body-fixed system (’), z =z’ symmetry axis
’
z
r 3 2 2
0
2 20
( ) 3cos
3
1
cos Q
Q eZ d r
z
r
r r
r
z
Sphere: 2 2 2 2 2
0
3
0sph
r x y z z
Q
Q0 measures deviation from spherical shape.
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s 9
Collective and s.p. Deformations
Q0>0 “prolate” Q0<0 “oblate”
collectivedeformation
cigarsingle hole around core
zz z z
collectivedeformation
discsingle particle around core
z
b a
Planar single-particle orbit: 20 3spQ eZ z 2 2r eZ r
Ellipsoidprincipal axes a, b
2 2 20
; ; :2
2 45 5
coll
a b RR R b a
R
Q eZ b a eZ R
Deformation parameter
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s 1
0
Spectroscopic Quadrupole Moment
zbody-fixed {x’, y’, z’}, Lab {x, y, z}Symmetry axis z defined by the experiment
2 20 3Q eZ z r intrinsic
What is measured in Lab system?
2
0 2
2 20
13 ....... 3cos 1
cos( )
2
z
zQ eZ z r Q e
Q
Z
Q P
finite rotation through
Measured Q depends on orientation of deformed nucleus w/r to Lab symmetry axis. define Qz as the largest Q measurable.
How to control or determine orientation of nuclear Q?
Nuclear spin to symmetry axis, no quantal rotation about z’
z’
x’
y’
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s 1
1
Angular Momentum and Q
Qz =maximum measurable maximum spin (I) alignment
2 2 2 2
32
ˆˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ3 3
( ) (cos ) ( ) . .
z m II I I
I I I
I IQ eZ z r z r Q
m I m I
d r r P r nucl wave funct
Legendre polyn. complete
basis set
2
0( , ) ( , ) (cos )
I
I Id P
23 32 2
0( ) (cos ) ( ) (cos ) (cos )
I
z I IQ d r r P r d r P P
2
0
0 2 2 0, 1 2zQ for I I
for any Q
Spins too small to effect alignment of Q in the lab.
z I
I
I couples with I to L =2
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s 1
2
Vector Coupling of Spins
mI=I
z
1I I
I 2
01ˆ 3cos 12z
I I
I IQ Q Q
m I m I
I≠0:
1 cos cos1
II
m I I II I
0 (2 1
20 ,1 2)
10z for I
IQ Q
I
23 ( 1)
( )2 1
Iz I z I
m I IQ m Q m I
I I
Any orientation
quadratic dependence of Qz on mI
“The” quadrupole moment
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s 1
3
Electric Multipole Interactions
z
E+E
E
F+F
F
Inhomogeneous external electric field exerts a torque on deformed nucleus. orientation-dependent energy WQ
Examples: crystal lattice, fly-by of heavy ions
E U
Taylor expansion of scalar potential U:
2 2 2
2 2 20 2 2 20
0 0 0
1( ) ...
2U U U
U r U r U x y zx y z
0r center of nucleus
2 2
2, ,ij i
i j
U Ux x y z
x x x
Axial symmetry of field assumed:
3
2 2 22 2 2
0 2 2 200 0 0
( ) ( )
...2
W eZ d r r U r
eZ U U UeZU eZ U r x y z
x y z
monopole WIS
dipole
0 quadrupole WQ
no mixed dervs.
WIS: isomer shift, WQ: quadrupole hyper-fine splitting
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s 1
4
Electric Quadrupole Interactions
2 22 2 2
2 20 0
2QeZ U U
W x y zx z
Maxwell equs. 4 (0) 0U
2 2
2 20
2
200
12
U U U
zx y
2 2 2
2 2 20
U U U
x y z
No external charge
22 2 2
20
22 2 2
20
24
24
QeZ U
W x y zz
eZ Ur z z
z
2
20
4( )Q z I
eZ UmW Q
z
Field gradient x spectroscopic quadrupole moment mI
2
axial symm=Uzz
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s 1
5
Quadrupole Hyper-Fine Splitting
Use external electrostatic field, align Q by aligning nuclear spin I,Measure interaction energies WQ (I >1/2 ) Quadrupole hyper-fine splitting of nuclear or atomic energy levels
Slight “hf” splitting of nuclear and atomic levels in Uzz≠0
splitting of emission/absorption lines
dN/dE
E
Uzz=0
Estimates: atomic energies ~ eVatomic size ~ 10-8cmpotential gradient Uz ~ 108V/cmfield gradient Uzz ~ 1016V/cm2
Q0 ~ 10-24 e cm2
WQ ~ 10-8 eVsmall !
mI=±2
mI=±1
I=0
I=2
mI=0
mI=0E2
ground stateUzz=0 Uzz≠0
excitedstate
isomer shift
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s 1
6
Experimental Methods for Quadrupole Moments
Small “hf” splitting WQ of nuclear and atomic levels in Uzz≠0
splitting of X-ray/ emission/absorption lines
Measurable for atomic transitions with laser excitations
nuclear transitions with Mössbauer spectroscopy
muonic atoms:
107 times larger hf splittings WQ with X-ray and spectroscopy
scattering experiments Uzz(t)
Nuclear spectroscopy of collective rotations model for moment of inertia 2
0
2
1
2
(10 20)2
I
I IE
Q
keV
I=0I=2I=4
I=6
I=8
. .
. .
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s 1
7
Collective Rotations
20 0
4( , ) 1 ( , )
3 5R
R R YR
z
b a : deformation parameter
20
2
0
20
20
31 0.16
5
12
. . :
21 0.31
5:
98
I
rig
irr
eZR
Rotational and inversion
symmetry even I
E I I
rigid body mom o inertia
MR
hydro dynamical
MR
Q
Nuclei with large Q0 consistent w. collective rotations lanthanides, actinides
Wood et al.,Heyde
2
15 182
keV
;2
a bR R a b
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s 1
8
Systematics of Electric Quadrupole Moments
2
Q R
RZR
odd-Nodd-Z
Q(167Er) =30R2
Prolate
Oblate
8 20 28 50 82 126
Q<0 : e.g., extra particle around spherical core. pattern recognizable
1729 5163 123
8209
8 3, , ,O Cu Sb Bi
Q>0 : e.g., hole in spherical core pattern not obvious. If such nuclei exist, weak effect of hole for Q
27 55 115 176 16713 25 49 71 68, , , ,Al Mn In Lu Er
Tightly bound nuclei are spherical: “Magic” N or Z = 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126, …
Tightly bound nuclei are spherical: “Magic” N or Z = 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126, …
Mostly prolate (Q>0) heavy nuclei
W. Udo Schröder, 2007
Nu
clear
Defo
rmati
on
s 1
9
Q0 Systematics
Møller, Nix, Myers, Swiatecki, LBL 1993
Q0 large between magic N, Z numbersQ0≈0 close to magic numbers