Six Sigma 2003

download Six Sigma 2003

of 20

Transcript of Six Sigma 2003

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    1/20

    What is Six Sigma?What is Six Sigma?

    Six Sigma is a business strategy that usesstatistical and non-statistical tools andtechniques, change management tools,

    project management skills, teamwork skillsand a powerful roadmap to maximize anorganization's return on investment (ROI)through the elimination of defects inprocesses.

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    2/20

    What makes Six Sigma differentWhat makes Six Sigma different

    from other quality managementfrom other quality managementinitiatives?initiatives?y Clear focus on achieving measurable and quantifiable financial

    returns

    y Importance on strong and passionate leadership

    y Integrates human elements (culture change, customer focus,

    belt system infrastructure, etc.) and process elements(process management, statistical analysis of process data,

    measurement system analysis, etc.) of improvement

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    3/20

    y Utilizes the tools and techniques for fixing problems in business

    processes in a sequential and disciplined fashion

    y Creates an infrastructure of Champions, Master Black Belts

    (MBBs), Black Belts (BBs) and Green Belts that lead, deploy and

    implement the approach

    y Utilizes the concept of statistical thinking and encourages the

    application of well-proven statistical tools and techniques for

    defect reduction through process variability reduction methods

    What makes Six Sigma differentWhat makes Six Sigma different

    from other quality managementfrom other quality managementinitiatives?initiatives?

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    4/20

    Benefits of Six SigmaBenefits of Six Sigma

    y Effective management decisions due to heavy reliance

    on data and facts instead of gut-feelings and

    y Increased understanding of customer needs and

    expectations

    y Increased cash flow by making processes more

    efficient and reliable

    y Improved knowledge across the organization on

    various tools and techniques for problem-solving

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    5/20

    y Reduced number of non-value-added operations

    through systematic elimination, leading to faster

    delivery of service, faster lead time to production,

    faster cycle time

    y Reduced variability in process performance, product

    capability and reliability, service delivery and

    performance

    y Transformation of organizational culture from being

    reactive to proactive thinking or mindset

    Benefits of Six SigmaBenefits of Six Sigma

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    6/20

    Six Sigma MethodologySix Sigma Methodology

    Five-stage methodology:

    y Define phase - involves identifying a project's CTQ (critical-to-

    quality) characteristics driven by the voice of the customer

    y Measurement phase - identify the key internal processes that

    influence CTQ characteristics and measures the defects currently

    generated

    y Analysis phase - establish process capability and define

    performance objectives by benchmarking and identifying the

    sources of variation

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    7/20

    Five-stage methodology:

    y Improvement phase - confirm the key

    variables or causes and quantifies their

    effects on the CTQs

    y Control phase - develop corrective actions,

    new standards and procedures, finalizedocumentation and share the key lessons

    learned from the project

    Six Sigma MethodologySix Sigma Methodology

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    8/20

    ASPIRE and Six Sigma at TataASPIRE and Six Sigma at Tata

    SteelSteely Until 2002, Tata Steel was following a modular framework

    that used numerous tools and techniques to bring about

    process improvements

    y Numerous process/performance improvement techniques

    and models, such as VE, ISO, QIP, TBEM, etc., were adopted

    over the years. But they did not have a perspective or

    organized framework that would guarantee that the problem

    solutions developed were the best or most optimal ones.Also, due to the localized and contextual nature, the leverage

    of solutions developed for one problem was not available for

    other similar problems

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    9/20

    y In order to address this issue and providean integrated framework Six Sigma

    methodology was started in June 2002

    y It was later merged with other initiativeslike total productive maintenance (TPM),

    5S, value engineering (VE), Poka-Yoka,theory of constraints and named asASPIRE (Aspirational Initiatives to RetainExcellence).

    ASPIRE and Six Sigma at TataASPIRE and Six Sigma at Tata

    SteelSteel

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    10/20

    ASPIRE DMAIC methodology (DMAIC, DefineASPIRE DMAIC methodology (DMAIC, Define--MeasureMeasure--AnalyzeAnalyze--ImplementImplement--Control) was deployed atControl) was deployed atTata SteelTata Steel

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    11/20

    Need for ASPIRE DMAIC approachNeed for ASPIRE DMAIC approach

    y For the production of 1 ton of hot metal

    400500 kg of coke is required

    y Coke is produced by carbonization of

    coal at about 10001100C

    y The coke so produced then undergoes a

    quenching process.

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    12/20

    y A need was felt to bring about improvementin the average levels of residual cokemoisture achieved as well as keeping its

    standard deviation low

    y A large number of improvement projectstaken in the past but these projects had not

    been able to make a permanent impact onthe intended objectives. Therefore, thisprocess was chosen for ASPIRE DMAICapproach for improvement

    Need for ASPIRE DMAIC approachNeed for ASPIRE DMAIC approach

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    13/20

    ASPIRE DMAIC approach forASPIRE DMAIC approach for

    improvementimprovement in the average levelsin the average levelsof residual coke moistureof residual coke moisturey Define phase - the CTQ identified was

    moisture % in coke and moisture content in

    coke should never be more than 3.5%y Measure phase

    a) Measurement of coke moisture was carriedout every shift by recording the loss in weight

    of the sample during testingb) A Gage R&R study was used to validate themeasurement system

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    14/20

    Average coke moisture from yearAverage coke moisture from year

    1999 February to 2002 February1999 February to 2002 February

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    15/20

    y Analyze phase -a) The upper specification limit of cokemoisture was defined as 3.5%

    b) A target was taken to improve thesigma level of moisture up to3 (corresponding to 6.7% defect)

    c) To improve the coke moisture someproblem areas were identified afterbrainstorming and these were analyzedwith the help of a failure modes andeffects analysis' (FMEA)

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    16/20

    FMEA performed onFMEA performed on

    quenchingquenchingProcess/operation/function

    Failure

    mode

    Effect of

    failureSeverity Causes Occurrence Control Detectability

    Quenching Inconsisten

    cy in flow

    rate

    Different

    amount of

    water used

    4 Different water

    level in quenching

    tank

    7 No control 8

    Leakage of

    water

    Extra water

    added

    6 Leakage from dry

    fog nozzles, flap

    sealing, sprayingvalve

    5 Time-to-time

    maintenance

    5

    Double

    quenching/s

    potquenching

    Excess

    moisture in

    coke

    8 Initial quenching

    not proper, faulty

    parameter design

    9 By experience 6

    Non-

    uniformdistributionof coke on

    quenching

    car

    Hot coke in the

    wharf

    7 No

    synchronizationof speed betweenloco and pusher

    ram

    8 Controlled by

    skill level ofoperator

    7

    Water

    carry over

    in thewharf by

    quenching

    car

    Higher

    moisture

    7 Improper drain-

    out, improper

    parameter design

    5 By experience 6

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    17/20

    d) Factors that impact the moisture level incoke were identified. After a detailed analysis,

    three critical parameters were shortlisted: Quenching time

    Crack opening time

    Drain-out time

    y Improve phase

    Once the parameters were finalized theoptimal combinations of these parametersfor getting lower average value and standarddeviation of the coke moisture weredetermined.

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    18/20

    Control phase

    a) After implementing the best possiblecombination the challenge was to make theperformance of coke moisture consistent

    b) the average value of coke moistureimproved from a base value of 3.432.7%.Standard deviation of coke moisture alsoimproved from 0.9 to 0.44

    c) To sustain the improvement in the longrun a rigorous automated controlmechanism was followed

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    19/20

    THANK YOU

  • 8/7/2019 Six Sigma 2003

    20/20