Sitewide Monitoring Programalaskacollection.library.uaf.edu/eafbsc/cd1/AR386-1.pdfMr. Mike McGee...

File: 18GD.B.

/"7X0 0 5 6,FINAL

Sitewide Monitoring Program

1995 Work Plan

Ejelso AFBAlask

NOVEMBER 1995~~-%

EA Engineering, Science, and Technology EA Fairbanks3532 lnternatpcna[ StreetFairbanks, AK G9701

Telephone 4907h 456-4751Fax SOP 456 1740

7 November 1995EA Project No. 12796.20Contract # P41 624-94-D-8052-0020

AFCEE/ERSMr. Mike McGee3207 North Road, Bldg. 532Brooks AFB, TX 78235-5363

Dear Mr. McGee:

Attached is the final version of the Work Plan for the 1995 Sitewide Monitoring Program(SWMP) at Eielson AFB, which incorporates both AECEE and RPM comments on the draftversion.

EA anticipates that the report of the 1995 SWMP results will include tables and figures thatpresent historical results for the source areas. EA and EAFB have discussed the future use of theBEAR system for producing comprehensive results tables and figures, and the use of existing baseCADD files for making figures. EA would like to establish the procedure for obtaining outputfrom the BEAR. EA anticipates that the BEAR system could be used to generate the map andtables containing this information.

This combination Work Plan, Field Sampling Plan, and Health and Safety Plan is submitted inaccordance with CDRL #s A002, A003, and A004 of our contract. If you have any questions,please contact either myself or EA's program manager, Mr. Ken Kilmer.

Sincerely,

David E. BeistelProject Manager

cc: Mike RaabeSteve McNeill

C AK22E.ORDrR21111w% R RE'

FINAL

Sitewide Monitoring Program

1995 Work Plan

o MCMXLVVL ~ o 1

Eielson AFB, Alaska

NOVEMBER 1995

SWMP 1995 Work Plan Eielson Air Force Base

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACRONYM S ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i

1.0 INTRODUCTION I.1.1I EIELSON AFB SITE SETTING...................I

1.1.1 Hydrogeology...... .................... ................ 21.1.2 Groundwater Quality ......... .................. .......... 21.1.3 Surface Water and Sediment Quality ..... ... ..... 3

1.2 OBJECTIVES OF 1995 SIThWIDE MONITORING ........... 41.3 REPORT ORGANIZATION ..................... 4

2.0 1995 HIELD SAMPLING PROGRAM RATIONALE AND PROPOSED WORK ...... 52.1 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MONITORING ............ 52.2 NORTH BOUNDARY WELLS............ . ...... 52.3 OPERABLE UNIT I ... . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. 6

2.3.1 ST2O Refueling Loop(E-7) Complex .............. 72.3.2 ST2O0 Refueling Loop(E-8) Complex ............. 82.3.3 ST20 Refueling Loop(E-9) Complex ............... 9

2.3.4 ST48 Power Plant Fuel Leak .. .. . . . .. . . . .. . . .102.35 ST49 Building 1300 Fuel Leak . .... ......... 1 22.3.6 SS50-52 Blair Lakes Facility ................................ 1 3

2.4 0U2 SUMMARY AND RATIONALE FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS .. 142.4.1 STIO0E-2 POL Storage Area/SS14 E-2 Railroad IN4 Spill .......... 142.4.2 STh 3/DP26 E-4 Diesel fuel spil/E- 10 fuel tank sludge burial pit . . .. 152.4. STI I fuel saturated area ................................... 1 6

2.4.4 STIS Oil Boiler Fuel Spill .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .172.4.5 ST19 3P4 Fuel Line Spill Area...................... ........ 18

2.5 0U3 SUMMARY AND RATIONALE FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS .. 192.5 I WP45/SS57 Photo Lab/ Fire Station Parking Lot.................19

2.6 0U4 SUMMARY AND RATIONALE FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS .. 202.6. 1 ST-27 E- I I Fuel storage tank area .. ........................ 202.6.2 SS36 Drum Storage Area ....................... 12.6.3 SS39 Asphalt Lake/SS63 Asphalt Lake Spill Site ................ 23

2.7 OU5 SUMMARY AND RATIONALE FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS .. 242.7.1 LFO3/FT09 Inactive Base Landfill] Fire Training Area ............ 242.7.2 LFO4 Old Army Landfill and Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) areas)

2.8 0U6 SKI LODGE WEL L CONTAMINATION.........................262.9 SER SITES ................................................... 28

2.9 I LFO I Original Base Landfill and Drum Storage Area ....... 282.9.2 LF05 Old Armyv Landfill................................... 292.9.3 ST]16 MOGAS Fuel Line Spill . ..... ........ .. 3 1


2.9.4 SS47 Commissary Parking Lot Fuel Spill................ ...... 322.9.5 DP55 Birch Lake Recreation Area ............................ 33

2. 10 UST AREAS ................................................. 34

3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN ................................. 353.1 PROJECT SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES ........................ ..... 353.2 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITY .................. 35

3. 1.1 Project Team Organization ................................. 353.1.2 Key EA Personnel Responsibilities ................... ....... 35

3.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE OBJECTIVES FOR MEASUREMENT DATA .... 383.3.1 Definition of Criteria ..................................... 38

3.3. 1.1 Accuracy ....................................... 393.3.1.2 Precision ............ ........................... 393.3.1.3 Representativeness ................................ 393.3.1.4 Completeness .................................... 393.3.1.5 Comparability .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40

3.3.2 Achievement of Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 403.4 SAMPLING PROCEDURES . . ................ 40

3.4.1 Sampling Protocols .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 403.4.2 Sample Handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 40

3.5 SAMPLE CUSTODY .... ........ .. ... ... .. 4 13.5.1 Field Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4 13.5.2 Laboratory Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4 1

3.5.2.1 Sample HandlingI. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I .413.5.2.2 Sample Receipt and Logging ............. 413.5.2.3 Sample Storage and Security ............. 423.5.2.4 Sample Tracking ................................. 423.5.2.5 Sample Identification and Custody Records ....... 42

3.6 CALIBRATION PROCEDURES FOR FIELD TEST EQUIPMENT ..... 433.7 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ................................. .. 43

3.7.1 Identification of Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 433.7.2 Detection and Quantitation Limits ... . . . . ... . . . ... 433.7.3 Method Calibration ...................................... 45

3.7.3 I Standard Receipt and Use Documentation ........ 453.7.3.2 Laboratory Calibration Procedures ........... 45

3.8 DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION, AND REPORTING ......... 463.8.1 Data Reduction . . . .. . . ........................... 46

3.8.1.1 Field Reportable Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 463.8.1 2 Laboratory Reportable Data ............. 46

3.8.2 Data Quality Assessment (Data Integrity) ............ 473.8.2.1 Field Activities ................... ............... 473.8.2.2 Laboratory Activities .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .48

ii


3.8.3 Data Validation and Data Reporting .................. ....... 483.8.3.1 Data Validation .................................. 483.8.3.2 Data Reporting and Storage ......................... 493.8.3.3 Data Storage .................................... 50

3.9 INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL CHECKS ............. 5 13.9.1 Field Quality Control ..................................... 513.9.2 Laboratory Quality Control Samples .......................... 5 1

3.9.2.1 Blanks ............ ............................ 523.9.2.2 Verification (Check) Solution ........................ 523.9.2.3 Laboratory Control Sample ........ ..... 523.9-2.4 Spikes ................................. ....... 533.9.2.5 Replicates ........ .............................. 533.9.2.6 Surrogates. .......................... .......... 533.9.2.7 Performance Evaluation Samples ........... 54

3.9.3 Control Limits ................................. ........ 543. 10 PERFORMANCE AND SYSTEM AUDITS .............. 54

3.10.1 System Audits .................. . . . . . . . . . . . .53.10.1.1 Internal System Audits . ... . . . . . . . . . ... 543.10.1.2 External System Audits . ... . . . . . . . . . ... 553.10.1.3 Performance Audits.............................. 553.10.1.4 Internal Performance Audits ........................ 563.10.1.5 External Performance Audits............ 56

3.11 LABORATORY PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE.......... .......... 563.12 PROCEDURES TO ASSESS DATA PRECISION. ACCURACY, AND

COMPLETENESS ............................................ 53.12.1 Form ulas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 573.12.2 Control Limits......... ................................ 573.12.3 Documentation and Review of QA/QC Activities ............... 57

3.13 CORRECTIVE ACTION ........................................ 583.14 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORTS ................ 59

3.14.1 Reporting Procedure .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 593.14.2 Report Content .... . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ... 59

4.0 FIELD SAMPLING PLAN....................... 604.1 FIELD OPERATIONS . . . ...... .. . . . . . . . . .. . 604.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING.................. 60

4.2.] Well Sampling Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 604.2. I . Well inspection .................................. 604.2.1.2 Determination of Water Level/Liquid Thickness .......... 6 14.2.1I.3 Well Purging and Sampling ......................... 61

4.2.2 Sample Handling . . . . . . . . .I. . . . . . . . . . . 624.2.3 Sample Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

iii


4.2.4 Quality Control Samples................... .............. 634.2.5 Sample Analysis Summary......... ...................... 63

4.3 FIELD MEASUREMENTS...................................... 634.3.1 Parameters ........................................... 634.3.2 Equipment Calibration................................... 644.3.3 Equipment Maintenance ................................. 644.3.4 Decontamination....................................... 64

4.4 FIELD QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM.......644.4.1 Control Parameters..................................... 644.4.2 Control Limits ........................................ 644.4.3 Corrective Actions.............. ....................... 64

4.5 RECORD KEEPING .......................................... 654.6 INVESTIGATIVE DERIVED WASTE ............................. 654.7 SITE MANAGEMENT.............. .......................... 65

5.0 REFERENCES.................................................... 66

APPENDIX A Site Safety and Health PlanAPPENDIX B Base Support Agreement

IV


LIST OF FIGURES

Number TiLe

1-1 Eielson Air Force Base Location Map

1-2 EAFB3 Water Table Elevation Contours, September 1992 (From EAFB SitewideRemedial Investigation Draft Report, Battelle-PNL, February 1995)

1-3 EAFB Water Level Hydrographs from Selected Wells (From EAFB3 SitewideRemedial Investigation Draft Report, Battelle-PNL, February 1995)

1-4 (3 pages) EAFB Map showing locations of selected source areas and monitoringwells in the developed portion of the base (from Sitewide Groundwater MonitoringProgram 1994 Report, Battelle PNL, January 1995)

1-5 EAFB Map showing locations of selected source areas and monitoring wells in the'1upland" portion of the base (from Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program1994 Report, Battelle PNL, January 1995)

2-1 ST20 Refueling Loop (E-7) Complex



2 -4 ST48 Power Plant Fuel Leak

2-5 ST49 Buildirg 1300

2 -6 SS50-52 Blair Lakes Facility

2-7 ST Il0/SSI14 E-2 POL Storage AreaIE-2 Railroad JP-4 Fuel Spill (from Eielson0132 Environmental Monitoring 1994 Field Activities Report, IT 1995)

2-8 ST Il3/DP26 Diesel Fuel Spill! Fuel Tank Sludge Burial (from Eielson 0U2Environmental Monitoring 1994 Field Activities Report, IT 1995)

2-9 STI I Fuel Saturated area (from 0132 Remedial Investigation Report (Final), PNL)

v


LIST OF FIGURES (continued)

Nuimber Tm~

2-10 STI18 Oil Boiler Fuel Spill (from Eielson 0U2 Environmental Monitoring 1994Field Activities Report, IT 1995.

2-li ST19 JP-4 Fuel Line Spill Area (from Eieison 0U2 Environmental Monitoring1994 Field Activities Report, IT 1995).

2-12 Cargain Road Fuel Spill results of microwell investigations (from Draft FinalReport on Microwell Investigations of Underground Storage Tanks and theCargain Road Spill at Eielson AFB, UNH, 1995)

2-13 WP45/SS57 Photo Lab/Fire Station Parking Lot (from 0U3,4,5 RemedialInvestigation Report (Revised Draft Final), PNL)

2-14 ST27 E-l II Fuel Storage Area (from 0U3,4,5 Remedial Investigation Report(Revised Draft Final), PNL)

2-I 55 S36 Drum Storage Area.(from 0U3,4,5 Remedial Investigation Report (RevisedDraft Final), PNL)

2-16 SS39 Asphalt Lake/SS63 Asphalt Lake Spill Site.(from OU3,4.5 RemedialInvestig-ation Report (Revised Draft Final). PNL)

2-17 LF03/FT09 Inactive Base Landfill/ Fire Training Area (from 0U3,4,5 RemedialInvestigation Report (Revised Draft Final). PNL)

2-18 LFC4 Old Army Landfill and EOD area (from 0U3,4,5 Remedial InvestigationReport (Revised Draft Final), PNL)

2 -19 0U6 Ski Lodge Area (from 0U6 ROD)

2-20 LFOI Original Base Landfill and Drum Storage Area (from Source EvaluationReport, Phase 2 Investigation, Battelle-PNL-)

2-2 LFO I Original Base Landfill and Drum StorageArea showing removal and cleanupdetail (from Source Evaluation Report, Phase 2 Investigation, Battelle-PNL)

Vi


LIST OF FIGURES (continued)

Numbe Lhk

2-22 LFO5 Old Army Landfill location (from SER Phase I Final Report, Battelle-PNL)

2-23 ST16 MOGAS Fuel Line Spill location (from SER Phase I Final Report, Battelle-PNL)

2-24 ST 16 MOGAS Fuel Line Spill sample locations (from SER Phase I Final Report,Battelle-PNL)

2-25 SS47 Commissary Parking Lot Fuel Spill location (from SER Phase I FinalReport, Battelle-PNL 1993)

2-26 SS47 Commissary Parking Lot Fuel Spill sample locations (from SER Phase IFinal Report, Battelle-PNL 1993)

2-27 DP55 Birch Lake Recreation Area location (from Source Evaluation Report,Phase 2 Investigation, Battelle-PNL)

2-28 UST at Building I1146

2-29 UST at Building 1307

2-30 UST at Building 2375

3-1 Groundwater Purging and Sampling Form

4-1 Low-flow Purge and Sample with Inertial Pump, Eielson AFB. Alaska

vii


LIST OF TABLES

NumbeTh

1-1 Average Metals Concentrations in Background Groundwater Samples

1-2 Sitewide Water Levels

2-1 Sampling Locations and Parameters

2-2 Total Metals in 1994 SWMP North Boundary Well Samples (from SitewideGroundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report, Battelle PNL, January 1995)

2-3 Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Samples from the 1994 SWM[P (fromSitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report, Battelle PNL, January1995)

2-4 Volatile Organic Compounds in OU/SER Groundwater Samples from the 1994SWMP (from Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report, BattellePNL, January 1995)

2-5 Total Metals in OU/SER Groundwater Samples from the 1994 SWMP (fromSitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report, Battelle PNL, January1995)

2-6 Historical Summary of Select VOC Results in 0U2 Groundwater Samples fromthe 1994 SWMP (from Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report,Battelle PNL, January 1995)

2-7 DRO and GRO Concentrations in OU/SER Groundwater Samples from the 1994SWMP (from Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report, BattellePNL, January 1995)

2-8 Lead Concentrations in OU/SER Groundwater Samples from the 1994 SWMP(from Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report. Battelle PNL,January 1995)

2-9 Gauging Data and Analytical Results, ST20 Refueling Loop (E-7) Complex


vii'


LIST OF TABLES (continued)

Numbe iil~Tk


2-12 Gauging Data and Analytical Results, ST48 Power Plant Fuel Leak

2-13 Gauging Data and Analytical Results, ST49 Building 1300

2-14 Gauging Data and Analytical Results, SS50-52 Blair Lakes Facility

2-15 Groundwater Analytical Results STIO/SS14 E-2 POL Storage AreaIE-2 RailroadJP-4 Fuel Spill (from 002 Remedial Investigation Report (Final), PNL)

2-16 Groundwater Analytical Results STi 31DP26 Diesel Fuel Spill! Fuel Tank SludgeBurial (from Eielson 002 Environmental Monitoring 1994 Field Activities Report.IT 1995)

2-17 Groundwater Analytical Results ST19 (from Ejelson 002 EnvironmentalMonitoring 1994 Field Activities Report. IT 1995)

2-IS WP45/SS57 Photo Lab/Fire Station Parking Lot Results of VOCs and Lead inGroundwater Samples (from 003,4.5 Remedial Investigation Report (RevisedDraft Final), PNL)

2-19 WP45/SS57 Photo Lab/Fire Station Parking Lot Results of TCE in GroundwaterSamples (from Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report, BattellePNL, January 1995)

2-20 LF03/FT09 Inactive Base Landfill/ Fire Training Area. Results of selectedchlorinated compounds in groundwater (from 003,4,5 Remedial InvestigationReport (Revised Draft Final), PNL)

2-21 006 Results of Organic Analytes in Groundwater (from 0U6 ROD)

2-22 006 Results of Organic Analytes in Groundwater (from EAFB Monitoring)

2-23 LFOI Original Base Landfill and Drum Storage Area Groundwater AnalyticalResults (from Source Evaluation Report, Phase 2 Investigation, Battelle-PNL-)

ix

SWMIP 1995 Work Plan Eielson Air Force Base


Number 111k

2-24 LFOI Original Base Landfill and Drum Storage Area Well ConstructionInformation (from Source Evaluation Report, Phase 2 Investigation, Batrelle-PNL)

2-25 LFG5 Old Army Landfill analyses completed (from SER Phase I Final Report,Battelle-PNL)

2-26 LF05 Old Army Landfill analytical results (from SER Phase I Final Report,Battelle-PNL)

2-27 STI6 MOGAS Fuel Line Spill analytical results (from SER Phase I Final Report,Battelle-PNL)

2-28 SS47 Commissary Parking Lot Fuel Spill analytical results (from SER Phase I FinalReport, Battelle-PNL)

2-29 DP55 Birch Lake Recreation Area groundwater analytical results summary (fromSource Evaluation Report, Phase 2 Investigation, Battelle-PNL)

3-1 Data Quality Characteristics Formulas

3-2 Quality Control Criteria for Precision & Accuracy for Surrogates, LaboratoryControl Samples (LCS), Matrix Spikes (MS), and Matrix Spike Duplicates (MSD)

3-3 Required Containers. Preservation Technique, and Holding Times for AqueousSamples

3-4 Analytical Methods

3-5 EA Laboratories Analytical Reporting Limits for Water Samples

3-6 Summary of Periodic Calibration Requirements

3-7 Sample Concentration Formulas

3-8 Summary of Laboratory Quality Control Criteria and Corrective Action Procedures

x

SWP1995 WrPlnEielson Air Force Base


Nunmhe Tle

3-9 Analytical Control Chart Calculations

3-10 Preventive Maintenance Requirements

4-1 SWMP Sample and Analysis Summary

4-2 Control Limits for Field Parameters

xi

SWMP 1995 Work Plan Ejelson Air Force Base

ACRONYMS

AFCEE (US) Air Force Center for Environmental ExcellenceBEARS Base-wide Environmental Analysis and Restoration SystemCAR Corrective Action RequestCDRL Contract Data Requirements ListCF Calibration FactorDO Delivery OrderEA EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.EDD Electronic Data DeliverableEPA (US) Environmental Protection AgencyEAFB Ejelson Air Force BaseFCR Field Change RequestFSP Field Sampling PlanFTL Field Team LeaderFTM Field Team ManagerGPS Groundwater Purging and SamplingHSP Health and Safety PlanIDL Instrument Detection LimitIDWP Investigation-Derived Waste PlanIRP Installation Restoration ProgramIRPLMS Installation Restoration Program Information

Management SystemITIR Informal Technical Information ReportLCS Laboratory Control SampleLIMS Laboratory Information Management SystemMDL Minimum Detection LimitNIP Management ProcedureMs Matrix SpikeMSD Matrix Spike DuplicateNIST National Institute of Standards and TechnologyPARCC Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness, Completeness, and

ComparabilityPCB Polychlorinated biphenylPE Performance EvaluationPM Project ManagerPNL Pacific Northern LabortoryPOL Petroleum Oil LubricantPRM Program ManagerPQL Practical Quantitation LimitQA Quality AssuranceQAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan

Xii


ACRONYMS (continued)

QC Quality ControlQM Quality ManagementRIIFS Remedial Investigation/Feasibility StudyRL Reporting LimitROD Record of DecisionRPD, Relative Percent DifferenceRSD Relative Standard DeviationSAP Sampling and Analysis PlanSOP Standard Operating ProcedureSVOC Semi-Volatile Organic CompoundUSAF United States Air ForceVOA Volatile Organics AnalysisVOC Volatile Organic Compound

xiii


1.0 INTRODUCTION

In November 1989, Eielson Air Force Base (EAFB) near Fairbanks, Alaska, was listed on theNational Priorities List of federal Superfund sites by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). The Federal Facilities Agreement (FFA) signed by the U.S. Air Force (USAF), EPA,and State of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC), specifies theframework and schedule for environmental cleanup efforts at EAFB.

The Sitewide Monitoring Program (SWMP) was established to provide and record informationabout groundwater and surface water quality during and after environmental restorationactivities at the base. The scope of the SWMP varies from year to year as wells or surfacewater samples or other sample locations are added to or removed from the program. Somemonitoring of source areas or surface water or sediment that was previously included in theSWMP may be completed under other contracts.

The SWMP will build on the records already established during the Remedial Investigationsand other field work at selected source areas. These records are stored in the BaseEnvironmental Restoration (BEAR) computer database system. The future reporting andrecording of information obtained in the SWIMP will make use of the EAFB BEAR system tothe extent practical. Ideally, all analytical data and sample locations will be stored in thesystem, and the system will be used to output relevant historical information and/or site mapsfor the final SWMP report for 1995. The BEAR system is capable of producing customizedoutput tables to show all historical results for a particular set of wells or analytes.

The SWMP was initiated in 1992 with the collection of groundwater samples from backg-roundwells and from wells located at the base boundary in a position hydraulically down gradient ofthe developed portion of the base and the source areas. In 1993 and 1994, the program wasexpanded to include selected wells from Operable Unit (OU) source areas and SourceEvaluation Report (SER) sites, and some surface water and sediment sample locations. In1995, the SWMP will encompass sampling of groundwater from monitoring wells at EAFB.In 1995, additional groundwater monitoring may also be completed at some source areas inOU I and 0U21 under the Remedial Design contracts for those areas.

1.1 EIELSON AFB SITE SETTING

The developed portion of Eielson AFB is located on the floodplain of the Tanana River,approximately 40 km southeast of Fairbanks, Alaska (Figure I - I ). The eastern portion of thebase is located in the Yukon-Tanana uplands. The hydrogeology of the base has been studiedand summarized in the Sitewide Remedial Investigation Draft Report (USAF 1995b) andassociated technical reports referenced in that document


1.1.1 Hydrogeology

Water levels have been manually measured at selected monitoring wells since September 1991.Groundwater gradient maps were plotted from this information. Figure 1-2 shows the watertable elevation map for the gauging information from September 1992.

Groundwater in the lowland portion of the base occurs in a sand and gravel aquifer underunconfined conditions. Groundwater in the upland area is perched on lenses of silt orpermafrost; a deeper aquifer is present in bedrock underlying the silt. Groundwater flow in thefloodplain sediments is to the north-northwest at a gradient of approximately 0.001 to 0.002(Figure 1-2). The vertical hydraulic gradient appears to be very small (USAF 1993a).

In the upland bedrock aquifer, groundwater flows to the west-southwest at a gradient ofapproximately 25 rn/km (Engineering Science 1994). The aquifers are primarily recharged inthe spring by runoff from snow melt. The water table in the lowland part of the base during thespring is approximately two feet higher than it is at other times of the year. Hydrographs werecreated from water level information from data loggers in certain wells. Figure 1-3 showssome typical hydrographs from wells at EAFB.

Comparison of the water elevation maps from different gauging rounds shows that the regionaldown gradient direction is consistently toward the north-northwest (USAF l995b). Localvariations are observed in certain areas because of the influence of nearby surface waterbodies, pumping from supply wells, and locally increased surface recharge from springtimemelting of large "disposal" piles from snow removal operations.

1.1.2 Groundwater Quality

Confirmed source areas of contamination at Eielson AFB3 have been grouped into six OUs.The locations of selected source areas and monitoring wells are shown in Fi-ures 1-4 and 1-5.Selected potential source areas are classified as "SER sites" (for Source Evaluation Report).The nature and extent of groundwater contamination at each OU is characterized in a remedialinvestigation (RI) report. Contaminants of concern (CsOC) identified in groundwater at thebase are primarily petroleum, oil, and lubricant (POL) products and solvents.

The North Boundary Wells are located hydraulically down gradient (north-northwest) of thedeveloped portion of the base (Figure 1-4). These five wells were sampled in 1988. 1989, and1992-1994 to monitor the quality of groundwater leaving the base (HLA 1 989, 1990; USAF1992. 1993e). To date, no contaminants have been detected in groundwater leaving the base.

Background groundwater quality at Eielson AFB3 has been characterized through the collectionand analysis of samples from 16 wells located in contamination-free areas in the lowland{de~elopecd) portion of the base. Results are reported in Background Ground-Water Qua/in',

'2


Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska (USAF 1993b) and Site-Wide Ground-Water Monitoring 1994Report (USAF 1995). No organic compounds have been detected in the background samples.Average concentrations of iron and manganese typically exceed the secondary maximumcontaminant levels (MCLs) for drinking water, and arsenic was measured at greater than theprimary MCL of 50 micrograms per liter (p~gfL) in one sample. Background concentrations ofmetals do not appear to exhibit seasonal variation.

Analytical results for background total metals (unfiltered samples) were higher in 1994 than inprevious years because the samples were acid-digested by the laboratory prior to analysis,which apparently leached metals from the sediment particles in the samples. Dissolved metals(filtered samples) concentrations in 1994 were similar to those from previous years.Background metals concentrations in groundwater samples are summarized in Table 1- 1.

1.1.3 Surface Water and Sediment Quality

Surface water and sediment quality at Eielson AFB were characterized in a 1993 investigation.Results are reported in Surface Water and Sediment Investigation Draft Report, Eielson AirForce Base (USAF 1994c). This study indicated that Garrison Slough is the surface waterbody most affected by base activities. The volatile organic compounds ( VOC), benzene,ethylbenzene. 1,2--dichloroethene (DICE), and trichloroethene (TCE), were detected in watersamples from Garrison Slough at a maximum concentration of 1.8 mg!L. The VOCs appear tooriginate from adjacent source areas.

The pesticides 4,4'-DDD and 4.4'-DDE were detected in Garrison Slough water samples at amaximum concentration of 0.052 g/.The pesticides 4,4'-DDD, 4,4'-DDE, and 4,4'-DDTwere detected in Garrison Slough sediment samples at a maximum concentration of 31 0micrograms per kilogram (pg,/kg-) These pesticide results were probably derived from theroutine application of pesticides at the base.

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were not detected in sediment samples collected fromGarrison Slough in 1993. However, PCBs were detected at an average concentration of 1.50milligrams per kilogram (mg/kga) in samples collected downstream of the water treatment plantinfiltration pond in 1990 (HLA 199 1).

Surface water and sediment samples were also collected and analyzed as part of the 1994SWMP. Results indicate that pesticides and PCBs were not detected in surface water samplesfrom Garrison Slough and French Creek: however, 1994 detection limits were higher than the4,4'-DDD and 4,4'-DDE concentrations measured in 1993. The 1994 pesticide concentrations(4,4'-DDD, 4,4'-DDT. and 4.4'-DDE) in sediment samples were generally higher than thosemeasured in 1993.

3

SWMP 1995 Work Plan Eiedsoni Air Force Base

The maximum concentration of I I mg/kg 4,4'-DDD was measured in the sample fromGarrison Slough and Quarry Road. An area of PCB contaminated sediment was delineatednear Arctic Avenue; the maximum concentration of Aroclor 1260 was 55 mg/kg. Sedimentresults are presented in the sitewide RI report (USAF 1995b).

TCE was detected in two Garrison Slough water samples at concentrations of 0.61 pig/L(Quarry Road) and 0.75 p~g/l_ (Kodiak Street). These results are comparable to thosemeasured in years prior to 1994 (USAF l993b). TCE is probably derived from contaminatedgroundwater at adjacent source areas (i.e., LF03IFT09).

1.2 OBJECTIVES OF 1995 SITEWIDE MONITORING

The overall objective of the SWMP is to develop a record of environmental conditions overtime at EAFB. As the Operable Unit source areas are remediated, the record will be used forperiodic review of the progress of remediation, and to make decisions about the scope offuture work at individual source areas. The objectives of the 1995 SWMP are as follows:

* monitor the groundwater elevations to record the down gradient direction and inferredflow patterns in the alluvial aquifer relative to prior results

* monitor the quality of groundwater in samples from the wells at the northern boundaryof the base as an indication of potential off-site migration

* monitor groundwater quality and groundwater elevations in selected areas, including:-source areas selected for remedial action-source areas recommended for no further action during the RI or SER process-source areas near drinking water supply wells-source areas that are landfills-UST areas that are being monitored under the Alaska UST regulations

1.3 REPORT ORGANIZATION

Section I of this report provides background information and identifies the objectives of the1995 SWMP at Eielson AFB. The rationale for selecting sampling locations and parametersand methods used to conduct the investigation are described in Section 2. Sampling andAnalytical procedures are presented and discussed in Section 3. The Quality Assurance ProjectPlan is presented in Section 4, and references are provided in Section 5. The Health and SafetyPlan (H-SP) for the field work is attached as Appendix A.

4


2.0 1995 FIELD SAMPLING PROGRAM RATIONALE AND PROPOSED WORK

The 1995 SWMP will involve gauging depth to water and sampling groundwater from selectedexisting well locations on EAFB. The groundwater samples will be analyzed at an off-siteanalytical laboratory. Analytical parameters will be selected based on a site-by-siteconsideration of the rationale for the 1994 SWMP and the recent historical results for eachsource area. The 1995 SWMP proposed field work is summarized in Table 2-I1, includingwells to be sampled and analytes specified for each source area. Well locations are shown inthe figures included in this section, and the rationale for selection of the wells and analytes foreach source area is discussed below. All information in this rationale section is obtained fromprevious reports written for the EAFB DERA program. The source of the most recentinformation for each of the source areas is referenced in this rationale section.

2.1 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MONITORING

Selected wells will be gauged manually using an ORS optical interface probe or equivalentelectric water sounding device. The wells to be gauged will be those that have beenperiodically gauged by the DERA field personnel to support the long-term groundwaterelevation investigation presented in the Sitewide RI (approximately 50 wells total). The list ofwells for routine gauging is shown in Table 1-2. The well gauiging task will be completed asquickly as possible to minimize the possibility of skewing of results in the event of a short-termrise or fall of water levels during the execution of the gauging task. Gauging will be performedonce, at the beginning of the SWMP field task. Wells to be sampled for groundwater qualitywill also be gauged during the sampling events.

Water table elevation results will be calculated by subtracting the depth to water informationfrom the most recent top of casing survey information. EA understands that some wells weresurveyed in Fall of 1994. Ideally the water elevation calculation will be completed using theBEAR system. All gauging information will be made available for entry into the BEARsystem.

2.2 NORTH BOUNDARY WELLS

Refer to:Figure 1--hz EAFB Map showing locations of selected source areas and monitoring wells

in the developed no rthern portion oft/he baseTable 2-2 Total Metals in 1994 SWMP North Boundary Well SamplesTable 2-3 Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Samples from the 1994 SWMP

Reference:Sitewvide Ground ht'ater Monitorin~g Pro grain 1994 Report. Battelle PIL. Jan uarv

5


1995

Site Setting

The five North Boundary Wells are located near the northern boundary of EAFB. Thewells are completed in the alluvial aquifer.

Summary of Previous Results

Samples collected during the 1994 SWMP were analyzed for metals, VOCs, and diesel rangeorganics. Total metals concentrations in the North Boundary Well samples were less than themaximum 1994 background value with the exception of those of barium and manganese in thesample from 51MB5, and of manganese in the sample from 08MOL. The North BoundaryWell data from 1992 through 1994 is discussed in detail in the sitewide RI report (USAF1995b).

Three organic compounds were detected at low concentrations in the sample from Well08MO I in August 1994: chloromethane (1.0 pg/L), 1,1,1 -trichloroethane (2.5 jggIL), andtoluene (5.2 pg[L). A second sample was collected from this well in September 1994 to verifythe presence of these compounds; however, they were not detected in the confirmation sample.Diesel range organics were not detected in any North Boundary Well sample. Based on theseresults, groundwater contamination from Elelson AFB does not currently appear to bemigrating off-base.

1995 Proposed Work

Samples will be collected from the North Boundary Wells to evaluate whether groundwatercontamination is present in the base aquifer at the down gradient edge of the base property.Table 2-I lists the wells where sampling is proposed and the proposed analytical methods.

2.3 OPERABLE UNIT 1

The OU I ROD was signed in September 1994 and Remedial Design is currently under way.The remedial design/remedial action will be based on the remediation equipment already inplace following the interim remedial action of 1992-1994. Monitoring of groundwater fromsome wells in the 01U11 source areas was completed on a quarterly schedule during 1994-1995.

OUl I includes the following source areas:ST20 Refueling loop (E-7) complexST2O Refueling loop (E-8) complexST20 Refueling loop (E-9) complex

6


ST48 Power plant fuel leakST49 Building 1300 fuel leakSS50-52 Blair Lakes facility

2.3.1 ST2O Refueling Loop (E-7) Complex

Refer to:Figure 2-1I ST2O Refueling Loop (E- 7) ComplexTable 2-9 Gauging Data and Analytical Results, ST20 Refueling Loop (E- 7)

Complex

Reference:OUJ Record of Decision; OUI Remedial Design documents, LA, in progress

Site Setting

Source area ST20 contains three refueling complexes (E-7, E-S, and E-9). Each complexconsists of an asphalt pad centered along the taxiway with adjacent unpaved areas of gravel and,grass. The complexes are served by a fuel pump house with three associated 190,000-L JP-4underground storage tanks (UST) and one 95,000-L defueling UST along with fueling anddefueling transfer pipes. The large area enclosed by the taxiway loop, north of the complex,contains surface water ponds. Garrison Slough is approximately 300 meters southwest of thecomplex.

The majority of aircraft refueling operations are conducted at the refueling loop, and numerousfuel spills occurred there in the past. The source of contamination at the E-7 Complex isbelieved to be leaks in the subsurface JP-4 fueling and defueling transfer pipes.Contaminants typically associated with JP-4 fuel include TP-H, VOCs (BTEX), and semi-volatile organic compounds (naphthalenes).

Floating petroleum products were encountered in 1982 in a 6-in test hole at the E-7 pumphouse. In July 1987. a 30-cm-thick layer of floating product was observed in a ditch excavatedduring maintenance work on an underground defueling line immediately north of the E-7 pumphouse.

Three static recovery wells subsequently were installed in the leak area and operated untilFebruary 1988: 3.350 L of JP-4 fuel were recovered before flow to the system was restricted.Another static recovery wvell was installed in late 1988; as of December 1989, approximately40 of fuel had been recovered. This recovery well was abandoned some time before October1991.

Bioventing was selected as the interim remedial action for the ST20 E-7 Complex. A

7


bioventing treatability study was conducted by Battelle Columbus at the ST2O E-7 Complexand ran until December 1993. Four areas were tested for microbial degradation of fuelhydrocarbons in soil using three different methods to heat the vadose zone: ambient air wascirculated in one area as a control; solar heating was installed in a second area by covering theground surface with transparent plastic; heated groundwater was recirculated in a third area;and heat tracing tape was buried in a fourth area. The data available from this study indicatethat bioventing is successful in reducing contaminant concentrations.

Summraryt of Previous Results

Analytical results for ST2O E-7 indicate that dissolved BThX compounds are present in thegroundwater in the area where free product has been detected.

1995 Proposed Work

Groundwater from selected wells will be sampled and analyzed to monitor the hydrocarbonconcentrations in the dissolved plume. Wells will be gauged to monitor the presence of freeproduct. The selected wells and the analytical methods are shown in Table 2- 1.


Refer to:Figure 2-2 ST20 Refueling Loop (E-8) ComplexTable 21-10 Gauging Data and Analytical Results, ST2O0 Refueling Loop (E-8)

Complex

Reference:OUI Record of Decision; OUJ Remedial Design documents, EA, in progress

Site Setting

Source area ST2O contains three refueling complexes (E-7, E-S, and E-9). Each complexconsists of an asphalt pad centered along the taxiway with adjacent unpaved areas of gravel andgrass. The complexes are served by a fuel pump house with three associated 190,OO0-L- JP-4underground storage tanks (UST) and one 95,000-L defueling UST along with fueling anddefueling transfer pipes. The large area enclosed by the taxiway loop, north of the complex,contains surface water ponds. Garrison Slough is approximately 300 meters southwest of thecomplex.

The source of contamination at the E-8 Complex is believed to be surface spills of JP-4 jet fuelresulting from overfilling of storage tanks. No interim remedial action has been conducted atthe F-S facility.

8



Analytical results for ST2O E-8 indicate that dissolved BTEX compounds are present in thegroundwater in the area near well 20M06.

1995 Proposed Work

Groundwater from selected wells will be sampled and analyzed to monitor the hydrocarbonconcentrations in the dissolved plume. Two well points will be installed close to well 20M06to permit groundwater sampling from the aquifer near this well.

Wells will be gauged to monitor the presence of free product. The selected wells and theanalytical methods are shown in Table 2-1.


Refer to:Figure 2-3 ST20 Refueling Loop(E-9) Complex Figure(s):Table 2-11 Gauging Data and Analytical Results, ST2O Refiteling Loop(E-9)

Complex

Reference:OUI Record of Decision; OUI Remedial Design documents, EA, in progress

Source area ST20 contains three refueling complexes (E-7, E-8, and E-9). Each complexconsists of an asphalt pad centered along the taxiway with adjacent unpaved areas of grave! andgrass. The complexes are served by a fuel pump house with three associated 190,000-L JP-4underground storage tanks (UST) a nd one 95,000-L defueling UST along with fueling anddefueling transfer pipes. The large area enclosed by the taxiway loop, north of the complex,contains surface water ponds. Garrison Slough is approximately 300 meters southwest of thecomplex. The majority of aircraft refueling operations are conducted at the refueling loop, andnumerous fuel spills have occurred there in the past.

Eielson AFB Liquid Fuels Department records indicate three spills at the E-9 Refueling Loop.Leak I was detected August 1988 and repaired June 1989. The leak was extensive: theamount of fuel lost is unknown. After the leak was repaired, a leak test was conducted on thepiping. During this test, contractors noticed fuel farther out on the tarmac seeping up throughcracks (Leak 2). The age of this leak is unknown. This leak was repaired in June 1989. Thethird leak was discovered near the refueling building in June 1992 and repaired in July 1992. Itoccurred in the line to the defueling tank. The amount leaked is unknown.

Four test trenches were excavated in August 19921 to test the feasibility of removing free

9


product, and one extraction trench was built in September 1992. A single recovery well(20RW04) was installed. To date, no petroleum products have been recovered from either theextraction trench or the recovery well. The product is apparently at lower pore pressures thanatmospheric pressure and is not flowing into the recovery structures, A passive skimmerplaced in well 20M25 in 1989 has recovered approximately 5 gal of petroleum product as ofApril 1993.

A bioventing system was installed and operated in field season 1993. The system injects airinto seven PVC vadose wells and a number of well points and groundwater wells.

In addition to the ongoing interim remedial actions at the refueling loop, the U.S. Air Forceconducted a tank tightness and pipeline leak detection investigation of USTs and associatedtransfer piping in 1993. Leaks identified in the testing were fixed or the line was taken out ofservice


Analytical results for ST2O E-9 indicate that dissolved BTEX compounds are present in thegroundwater in the area where free product has been detected.

1995 Proposed Work


27.3.4 ST48 Power Plant Fuel Leak

Refer to.Figure 2-4 ST48 Power Plant Fuel LeakTable 2-12 Gauging Data and Anal ytical Results, ST48 Power Plant Fuel LeakTable 2-4 Volatile Organic Compounds in QUISER Groundwater Samples from

the 1994 SWMP (from Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program1994 Report, Battelle PNL, January 1995)


Site Setting

ST4S is an area of a fuel release to the south and east of the base power plant. It is believedthat the fuel was released from a buried multi-fuel pipeline in the area of well 48M01. Interim

I 0


remedial actions have been conducted since 1992 to investigate the recoverability of the freeproduct and to implement a bioventing system at the source area.

Base supply well D, located to the north of the power plant building, pumps groundwater fromapproximately 130 feet deep to supply potable water to the base drinking water distributionsystem. Monitoring wells 48M04, 48M05, and 48M06 are completed as nested wells atapproximately 15 ft bgs. 45 ft bgs, and 100 feet bgs respectively, to permit samplinggroundwater from discrete depths within the aquifer near the base supply well.

Per the OU I ROD, the selected remedy for ST48 is bioventing to reduce the fuel source in theupper aquifer.

Surmmary of Previous Results

Free product and dissolved BIEX compounds have been detected in the previous groundwatermonitoring rounds in the area of the fuel release to the southwest of the power plant. Resultsfrom the nested monitoring wells near the supply Well D indicate that BTEX compounds insamples from these wells are below MCL concentrations.

1995 Proposed Work

Groundwater from selected wells will be sampled and analyzed to monitor the hydrocarbonconcentrations in the dissolved plumne. Wells will be gauged to monitor the presence of freeproduct. The selected wells and the analytical methods are shown in Table 2-I1.


2.3.5 ST49 Building 1300 Fuel Leak

Refer to:Figure 2-5 ST49 Building 1300Table 2-13 Gauging Data and Analytical Results, ST49 Building 1300Table 2-4 Volatile Organic Compounds in OUISER Groundwater Samples from

the 1994 SWMP (from Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program1994 Report, Battelle PNL, January 1995)

Reference:OUI Record of Decision; (JUl Remedial Design documents, EA, in progress

Site Setting

Building 1300 is the Alert Hangar, a large hangar at the south end of the main runway that isused for readiness exercises and missions. The hangar is in a restricted area on the flight line.ST49 includes the area under Building 1300 and the area north of the building. It is thoughtthat fuel was accidentally released from either the fuel tanks at the south end of the building orfrom piping in the vicinity of the utility room. Free product has been detected in the past inwells 49GMW, 49M0O2 and 49RWO01 (located close to 49M02). Product has been recoveredfrom 49GMW and 49RWO0I using air lift pumps or passive skimmers that are periodicallyemptied by hand. Recovered fuel is disposed of by the base HazMat facility. Less than I100eallons of fuel have been recovered from the two wells since 1992. The skimmers in the wellsare prone to fouling with a black slime.

As detailed in the 0O.1I ROD, the selected remedy for ST49 is groundwater monitoring.


Analytical results for ST49 indicate that BTEX compounds in the area of the free product aregenerally below 50 u~g/l . Chlorinated compounds have been detected at concentrations lessthan IO 1-g/I in the area north of the building.

1995 Proposed Work


1 2

SWMIP 1995 Work Plan Eielson Air Force Base

2.3.6 SS50-52 Blair Lakes Facility

Refer to:Figure 2-6 SS5O-52 Blair Lakes FacilityTable 2-14 Gauging Data and Analytical Results, SS50-52 Blair Lakes Facility


Site Setting

SS50-52 Blair Lakes Facility is a remote facility inside a bombing target range approximately40 miles east of the base. The buildings of the facility are constructed on a gravel padapproximately 8 feet thick that was constmucted over the wet muskeg natural surface in thearea. Fuel releases have occurred in the past from several sources along the supply lines fromthe large ASTs to the generators, heaters, and day tanks at the facility buildings. Free productis present in the area of well 50MO I.

Product has been recovered from a I12-inch diameter steel recovery well near 50MOI1. Morethan 400 gallons of product have been recovered from this well using air-lift pumps poweredby a compressor inside the facility.

Per the OU I ROD, the selected remedy for SS50-52 is continued free product removal andbioventing.


Analytical results for SS50-52 indicate that BTEX compounds are present in the area of thefree product.

1995 Proposed Work

Groundwater from selected wells will be sampled and analyzed to monitor the hydrocarbonconcentrations in the dissolved plume. Wells will be gauged to monitor the presence of freeproduct. The selected wells and the analytical methods are shown in Table 2-I1.

1 3


2.4 0U2 SUMMARY AND RATIONALE FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

0U2 consists of source areas in the developed portion of the base where POL compounds havebeen released to the soil and groundwater. The 0U2 ROD was signed in September 1994.Four source areas were selected for active remediation (STIO/SS14 and ST13/DP26). Othersource areas were selected for continued monitoring under the SWMP.

0U2 includes the following source areas:

ST]IC E-2 POL Storage Area/SSl14 E-2 Railroad JP4 SpillST13 E-4 Diesel fuel spill/DP26 E-1O fuel tank sludge burial pitSTI I Fuel Saturated AreaST18 Oil Boiler fuel-saturated areaSTI9 .JP4 Fuel Line Spill

2.4.1 ST1O E-2 POL Storage Area/SS14 E-2 Railroad JP4 Spill

Refer to:Figure 2-7 STIO/SSI4 E-2 POL Storage Area/FE-2 Railroad JP-4 Fuel Spill (from

Eielson 0U2 Environmental Monitoring 1994 Field Activities Report,IT 1995

Table 2-15 Groundwater Analvtical Results STIO/SSJ4 E-2 POL Storage Area/E-2 Railroad JP-4 Fuel Spill (from 0U2 Remedial InvestigationReport (Final), Battelle-PNL,

Reference:0U2 Environmental Monitoring 1994 Field Activities Report. IT 19950U2 Remedial Investigation Report (Final), PAIL

Site Settinc

STIOISS 14 includes the bulk fuel storage facility, Hardfill Lake, and the railroad area, locatedin the southeast portion of the developed area of the base. The combined source areas includeareas of free phase product and dissolved fuel compounds released from the tanks andassociated piping.

The Remedial Design and field work to implement substantial continuous remediation is underway in field season 1995. A bioventing system will be constructed at STIO/SSI14 in the area ofthe free product.

1 4

SWMP 1995 Work Plan Ejedson Air Force Base


Wells from source area ST IO were not sampled in the 1994 SWMP. Selected wells weresampled by IT in field season 1994 and results were reported in the IT Field Activities report(USAF 1994).

IT personnel installed well IOMWI2 in field season 1994. The screened interval of wellIOMW12 is located between 25 and 40 feet bgs. IT personnel collected groundwater samplesfrom well I10MW 1 2. Benzene was measured at concentrations of 9.0 and 9.2 Pg/I in a fieldsample and a field duplicate.

Analytical results from the RI/ES (Table 2-15) indicate that BTEX compounds have beenfound in groundwater samples in the area of the free product.

1995 Proposed Work


2.4.2 STI3IDP26 E-4 Diesel fuel spillIE-1O fuel tank sludge burial pit

Refer to:Figure 2-8 ST1I/DP26 Diesel Fuel Spidl/ Fuel Tank Sludge Burial (from Eielson

0U2 Environmental Monitoring 1994 Field Activities Report, IT 1995.

Table 2-16 Groundwvater Analytical Results ST73/DP26 Diesel Fuel Spill/FuelTank Sludge Burial (from Eielson 0U2 Environmental Monitoring1994 Field Activities Report, IT 1995).

Table 2-4 Volatile Organic Compounds in OU/SER Groundwater Samples fromthe 1994 SWMP (from Sitewvide Groundwater Monitoring Program1994 Report, Battelle PNL, Januarv 1995)

Reference.SWMP 1994 Report, Battelle-PNL 1995Etelson 0U2 Environmental Monitoring 1994 Field Activities Report. IT 1995

Site Setting

ST13 is a diesel spill near the fuel outlets along the southeast end of the main taxiway. Therewere 10 underground tanks of jet fuel and one tank of diesel fuel prior to upgrading of thefacilities begun in 1994. DP26 is located directly east of ST) 3, and has been used for fuel

1 5

SWIMP 1995 Work Plan Eielson Air Force Base

dispersal since the base was established. Spills and leaks from the fueling equipment haveresulted in free product and dissolved fuel compounds in the groundwater. These combinedsource areas in the southwest portion of the developed area of the base include areas of freephase product and dissolved fuel compounds.

Remedial design and field work to implement substantial continuous remediation is under wayin field season 1995. A natural attenuation study by University of Utah personnel is underwayduring field season 1995.


Analytical results from the RI/ES and the field season 1995 sampling by IT (Table 2-16)indicate that BTEX compounds are present in groundwater samples in the area of the freeproduct.

Well 26-6 was sampled and the samples analyzed for VOCs during the 1994 SWMP. NoVOCs were detected in the sample from Well 26-6, which is on the lateral edge of the plume ofbenzene contamination emanating from DP'26.

1995 Proposed Work

Groundwater from selected wells will be sampled and analyzed to monitor the hydrocarbonconcentrations in the dissolved plume. Wells will be gauged to monitor the presence of freeproduct. The selected wells and the analytical methods are shown in Table 2-l1

2.4.3 ST11 fuel saturated area

Refer to:Figure 2-9 SThJ Fuel Saturated area (frfom 0U2 Remedial Investigatzon Report

(Final), PNL)Table 2-6 Historical Summary of Select VOC Results in 0U2 Groundwater

Samiples from the 1994 SWM~P (from Sitewide GroundwaterMonitoring Program 1994 Report, Battelle PNL, January 1995)

Reference:SWMWP 1994 Report. Battelle-PNL 1995

Site Setting

ST I I is now a dog training facility adjacent to Garrison Slough. The area was once the basebakery where diesel-fueled ovens were fed by an underground pipeline. Leaks believed to befrom the pipeline resulted in a fuel layer on the groundwater and in Garrison Slough. In the

1 6


late 1970's, the pipeline was removed and the residual fuel was removed from the top of thewater, The groundwater flows away from Garrison Slough for most of the year.


BTEX compounds were not detected in the samples from STI I (Well 11 -3) in the 1994SWMIP work,

1995 Proposed Work

Groundwater from well 11 -3 will be sampled and analyzed to monitor for the presence ofcontaminants. The proposed analytical methods are shown in Table 2-I

2.4.4 ST18 Oil Boiler Fuel Spill

Refer to:Figure 2-10 ST18 Oil Boiler Fuel Spill (firom Eielson 0U2 Environmental

Monitoring 1 994 Field Activities Report, IT 1995.Table 2-6 Historical Summary of Select VOC Result's in 01.12 Groundwater

Samples from the /994 SWMP (from Sitewide GroundwaterMonitoring Program 1994 Report, Ba~ttelle PNL, January 1995)

Table 2-12 Gauging Data and Analytical Results, ST48 Power Plant Fuel Leak

Reference:SWMP 1994 Report, Battelle-PNL 1995

Site Setting

ST IS8 consists of three buildings in an industrial pant of the base, southwest of the base powerplant. The buildings house several emergency generators that are fueled by two 215000-gallonUSTs. Petroleum products were detected during an excavation project in the mid- 1970's. Thesource is believed to be the USTs. The tanks failed a tightness test in August 1993, and theywere slated to be removed in 1994.


BTEX were not detected in the samples from STI 8 (Well 18-3) in the 1994 SWMP work.Wells 18-3, 18-5, and 18-6 have also been sampled as part of the quarterly monitoring forST48 (Table 2-12). Low concentrations of fuel contaminants have been detected in thesesamples.

IT personnel sampled groundwater from four existing wells (I18-3, 18-7, I 8MW051, and

1 7


48MW07) and analyzed the samples for VOCs by EPA Method 8240. No VOCs weredetected in any of the samples (IT 1995).

1995 Proposed Work

Groundwater from well 18-3 will be sampled and analyzed to monitor for the presence ofcontaminants. The proposed analytical methods are shown in Table 2-I1.

2.4.5 ST19 JP4 Fuel Line Spill Area

Refer to:Figure 2-11 STJ9 JP-4 Fuel Line Spill Area (from Eielson 0U2 Environmental

Monitoring 1994 Field Activities Report, IT 1995).Figure 2-12 Cargain Road Fuel Spill results of microwell investigations (from

Draft Final Report on Microwell Investigations of UndergroundStorage Tanks and the Cargain Road Spill at Eielson AFB, UNH-,1995)

Table 2-17 Groundwater Analytical Results ST19 (from Eielson 0 U2Environmental Monitoring 1994 Field Activities Report, IT 1995).

Reference:0U2 Proposed PlanDraft Final Report on Microwell Investigations of Underground Storage Tanks andthe Cargain Road Spill at Eielson AFB, UNH, 1995Eielson 0U2 Environmental Monitoring 1994 Field Activities Report, IT 1995

Site Setting

STl19 is located along buried fuel pipelines in an undeveloped part of the base along CargainRoad. A fuel spill was caused in the 1950's when a snowplow broke a pipeline valve. The0132 ROD selected remedy for this area is groundwater monitoring.

After the RUES was complete, a second fuel spili occurred in the area of STI9, in August1994, when a part of the fuel pipeline failed. Product recovery efforts were underway in the1994 field season, and more than 14,700 gallons of fuel had been removed from a manholealong the pipeline as of December 1994 (UNH, 1995). The Environmental Compliance sectionof the base Civil Engineering Squadron is overseeing the product recovery efforts.


BTEX compounds were not detected in the samples from STI 9 (Well 19MW06) during the1994 SWMP.

1 8

SWMP 1995 Work Plan Eiedson Air Force Base

IT installed one monitoring well in 1994 (19MW07), and abandoned well 19-2A because itwas broken off at 3 ft bgs. Four wells were sampled by IT in 1994; the results indicate thatfuel compounds are present in groundwater at the source area (Table 2-17).

UNH- personnel installed numerous microwells and collected product thickness measurementsand groundwater samples from the new wells. A summary figure of the UNH results is shownin Figure 2-12. Free-phase product and dissolved fuel compounds are present in the aquifersouth of the location of the STI 9 wells.

1995 Proposed Work

Groundwater from wells 1 9M06 and 1 9M07 will be sampled and analyzed to monitor for thepresence of contaminants. The proposed analytical methods are shown in Table 2-I1.

2.5 003 SUMMARY AND RATIONALE FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

The source areas in 0U3 will be addressed by a ROD scheduled for signature in September1995. Only source area 45/57 in 003 will be sampled during 1995 sitewide monitoring.

2.5.1 WP45/SS57 Photo Lab/ Fire Station Parking Lot

Refer to:Figure 2-13 IVP45S/S57 Photo Lab/Fire Station Parking Lot (from 0U3,4,S

Remedial In vestigation Report (Revised Draft Final), PNL)Table 2-18 WP45/SS57 Photo Lab/Fire Station Parking Lot Results of VOCs and

Lead in Groundwater Samples (from 0U3,4,S Remedial InvestigationReport (Revised Draft Final), PNL)

Table 2-19 WP45S/S57 Photo Lab/Fire Station Parking Lot Results of TCE inGroundwater Samples (from Sitevwide Groundwater MonitoringProgram /994 Report, Battelle PNL, January 1995)

Reference:0U3,45 Remedial Investigation Report (Revised Draft Final), PNLSitewvide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report, Battelle PNL, Januaryv1995

Site Setting

WP45/SS57 Photo Lab! Fire Station ParkinQz Lot are two source areas located adjacent to oneanother near the main taxiway along the west side of Flightfine Avenue. Solvent contaminationhas been found in the groundwater but not in the soils at WP45. Fuel contamination has beenfound at SS57, the source is uncertain.

1 9



A study of natural attenuation of the contaminants at the two source areas is under way duringfield season 1995. The 1994 SWMP involved sampling and analysis to confirm the analysesseen in the sampling completed for the natural attenuation study. The previous results (Tables2-18 and 2-19) indicate that TCE is present in the groundwater at concentrations below 10ugh1.

Groundwater from wells 45M04 and 45MW08 will be sampled and analyzed to monitor forthe presence of chlorinated VOC and fuel contaminants. The proposed analytical methods areshown in Table 2-1.

2.6 0134 SUMMARY AND RATIONALE FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

The source areas in 0U4 will be addressed by a ROD scheduled for signature in September1 995.

0U4 includes the following source areas:

ST47 E-lI I Fuel storage tank areaSS36 Drum storage areaSS39 Asphalt lake / SS63 Asphalt spill site

2.6.1 ST27 E-11 Fuel storage tank area

Refer to:Figure 2-14 ST27 E-1Il Fuel Storage Area (from 0U3,4,5 Remedial Investigation

Report (Revised Draft Final), PNL)Table 2-7 DRO and GRO Concentrations in OUISER Groundwater Samples

from the 1994 SWMP (from Site wide Groundwater MonitoringProgram 1994 Report, Battelle PNL, January' 1995)

Table 2-8 Lead Concentrations in QUISER Groundwater Samples from the 1994SWMP (fromt Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994Report, Battelle PNL, Januaryv 1995)

Reference:Sitewvide Groundwater Monitoring Pro grain 1994 Report, Battelle PNL. January1995

20


Site SettinQ

ST27 is a fence-enclosed complex of five fuel tanks on the south side of Quarry Roadapproximately 2000 feet southeast of Hardfill Lake. The area is actively used for storage ofJP8. The tank facility is being upgraded under a project begun in 1994. Before 1980, thissource was identified as a location where sludge from tank cleaning operations was buried inshallow trenches in the tank area. The RI/FS results indicate that no fuel contamination ispresent in the groundwater.


In the 1994 SWMP, groundwater samples were collected from wells B-8, B-il1, and B-19 atST27 to verify the absence of fuel-related contamination and to monitor lead concentrations.Diesel and gasoline range organics were not detected in the ST27 samples (Table 2-7). Totallead concentrations ranged from 38 1ag/]_ to 54 pg/L (Table 2-8). In June 1992, total leadconcentrations were measured at 12 pig/L to 22 M~g/L in groundwater samples from this sourcearea however, these values are not directly comparable with the 1994 data because of differentsample digestion procedures. The 54 4ig/L value in the sample from Well B-S slightly exceedsthe maximum 1994 total lead background value of 48 pzigfL.

1995 Proposed Work

Groundwater from the wells at the source area will be sampled and analyzed to monitor for thepresence of fuel contaminants and lead. The proposed wells and analytical methods are shownin Table 2-I1.

SWMP 1995 Work Plan Eielsoni Air Force Base

2.6.2 SS36 Drum Storage Area

Refer to:Figure 2-15 SS36 Drum Storage Area.(from 0U3,4,5 Remedial Investigation

Report (Revised Draft Final), PNL)Table 2-4 Volatile Organic Compounds in QUISER Groundwater Samples from

the 1994 SWMP (from Site wide Groundwater Monitoring Program1994 Report, Battelle PNL, January 1995)

Table 2-5 Total Metals in QUISER Groundwater Samples from the 1994 SWMP(from Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report,Battelle PNL, January 1995)

Reference:Site wide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report, Battelle PNL, January1995

Site Setting

5536 Drum Storage Area was used ats a mixing area for asphalt cement and road oilingoperations from the late 1960s to the mid 1970s. As of 1982, approximately 100 drumscontaining materials such as waste oils, jet fuel, diesel fuel, hydraulic fluid, Stoddard solvent,and methyl ethyl ketone were stored at the site. The drums were removed under the Air Forcehazardous materials program. Soil contaminated by a paint spill was removed in 1992.


Three wells at SS36 were sampled during the 1994 SWMP (36-1, 36-2, 36M03) to confirm theabsence of VOC and metals contamination in groundwater, and to monitor lead concentrations.VOC results (Table 2-4) show that 1, 1, I-trichloroethane, TCE, tetrachioroethene, and toluenewere detected at SS36 at a maximum concentration of 3.1 pg/L. Chloromethane was alsodetected at a concentration of 1.2 pg/L. Sample concentrations are below the MCLs for 1, 1,I -trichloroethane and TCE, and below risk-based screening levels listed in EPA's SupplementalGuidance for Superfund Risk Assessments in Region 10 ( EPA 1991 ) for tetrachloroethene,toluene, and chloromethane. Metals concentrations at SS36 are comparable to averagebackground values.

1995 Proposed Work

Groundwater from three wells (36-1, 36-2, 36M03) at the source area will be sampled andanalyzed to monitor for the presence of fuel contaminants. TCE. and lead. The proposed wellsand analytical methods are shown in Table 2-I1.

22


2.6.3 SS39 Asphalt Lake/SS63 Asphalt Lake Spill Site

Refer to:Figure 2-16 SS39 Asphalt Lake/S563 Asphalt Lake Spill Site.('fromn 0U3,4,5

Remedial Investigation Report (Revised Draft Final), PNL)Table 2-7 DRO and GRO Concentrations in OUISER Groundwater Samples

from the 1994 SWMP (from Sitewide Groundwater MonitoringProgram 1994 Report, Battelle PNL, January 1995)

Table 2-8 Lead Concentrations in OU/SER Groundwater Samples from the 1994SWMP (from Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Pro grain 1994Report, Battelle PNL, January 1995)

Reference:Site wide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report, Battelle PNL, January1995

Site SettinQ

These adjacent source areas are located approximately one mile south of the Eielson main gate.SS39 was a disposal area for drums of asphalt cement after runway construction in the 1950's.Drums, asphalt, and debris were removed from the area in May and June 1992. Siteinvestigations and analysis of soil and groundwater after the removal shows no contaminationthat poses a risk to human health or the environment.


Five wells at SS39/63 were sampled under the 1994 SWMP (39M01, 39M03, 39M04, 39M05.53M02) to verify the absence of fuel-related groundwater contamination. Diesel rangeorganics were detected in the sample from 39M0 I at a concentration of 0.30 milligrams perliter (mg/IL.) (Table 2-7). The chromatogramn peaks matched the pattern for diesel. Gasolinerange organics were not detected in any sample. The maximum lead concentration was 2.8.ig/L (Table 2-8). Based on these results, evidence of fuel contamination was found in thesample from one well (39M01).

1995 Proposed Work

Groundwater from five wells (39M01, 39M03, 39M104, 39M05, 53M02) will be sampled andanalyzed to monitor for the presence of fuel contaminants and lead. The proposed wells andanalytical methods are shown in Table 2-I1.

23


2.7 OUS SUMMARY AND RATIONALE FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

The source areas in GU5 will be addressed by a ROD scheduled for signature in September1995. OU5 includes the following source areas:

LFO3IFT09 Inactive base landfill I Fire training areaLFO4 Old army landfill and explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) area

2.7.1 LF03/FT09 Inactive Base Landfill/Fire Training Area

Refer to:Figure 2-17 LF03/FTO9 Inactive Base LandfillblFire Training Area (from 0U3,4,5

Remedial Investigation Report (Revised Draft Final), PNL)Table 2-20 LFO3/FTO9 Inactive Base Landfill!/Fire Training Area, Results of

selected chlorinated compounds in groundwater (from 0U3,4,5Remedial Investigation Report (Revised Draft Final, PNL)

Reference:0U3,4,5 Remedial Investigation Report (Revised Draft Final, PNL)

Site Setting

LF03IFTO9 occupies approximately 100 acres of the base near the south end of the runway andnorth of the refueling loop. LF03 was used as the main base landfill from 1967 to 1987, andFT09 was a major fire training area from 1955 to 1989.

During landfill operations, waste materials were reportedly dumped into standing water as thelandfill excavations reportedly extended below the depth to water. The landfill received baserefuse, including household garbage, construction debris, and empty cans and drums from theflightline industrial shops. LF03 also reportedly received waste oils and solvents, and paintresidues and thinners. The majority of the landfill received wastes before 1980. After 1980,long trenches in the northern end of the landfill area were excavated to receive waste.

Ff09 was used for fire training exercises from 1972 to 1979. Fuel and waste oils and solventwere burned in the fire training area.

The present land surface over the buried debris is approximately level with the natural grade atthe base. Some of the surface of the landfill area is currently used as a land farm to store,segregate and treat contaminated soil that is encountered during ongoing constructionoperations at the base. Piles of clean soil and asphalt debris have also been stored in the area ofLF03 since 1992.

24


The Proposed Plan for 0U3,4,5 indicates that the preferred alternative for the area ofLFO3/FTO9 is to install a landfill cap as required under RCRA Subtitle C.


LF03 was not sampled during the 1994 SWMP. A summary table from the RI showing selectsolvent compounds is shown in Table 2-20. The results indicate that wells 03M08, 03M04, andO3Ml15 all contained TCE at less than 10 ug/l during prior sampling rounds.

1995 Proposed Work

Three wells at LF03/I`TO9 are proposed for sampling (03M01, 03M08, and 03Ml13) tomonitor groundwater down gradient from the landfill for contaminants. The proposed wellsand analytical methods are shown in Table 2-1. The analytical methods were chosen to identifycontaminants that might be present in the landfill, and the list of landfill monitoring analytesshown in 40 CFR258.53, Subpart E.

2.7.2 LFO4 Old Army Landfill and Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) area

Refer to:Figure 2-18 LF04 Old Army Landfill and SOD area (from 0U3,4,5 Remedial

Investigation Report (Revised Draft Final), PNL)Table 2-3 Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Samples from the 1994 SWMPTable 2-4 Volatile Organic Compounds in OU/SER Groundwater Samples from

the 1994 SWMVPTable 2-5 Total Metals in QUISER Groundwater Samples from the 1994 SWMPTable 2-7 DRO and GRO Concentrations in OU/SER Groundwater Samples

from the 1994 SWMP (all from Sitewide GroundwvaterlMonitoringProgram 1994 Report, Battelle PNL, January 1995)

Reference:0U3,4,5 Proposed PlanSitevwide Groundwater Monitoring Pro grain 1994 Report, Battelle PNL, JanuarY1995

Site Settinu

LFO4 is located approximately 1.5 miles east-northeast of the south end of the runway. LF04is an old Army landfill where general refuse was disposed. The landfill reportedly receivedsmall quantities of waste oil and spent solvents, and may have received small amounts ofmunitions and spent cartridges. The Army originally used the area to store ammunition inbunkers. Currently, access to the area is restricted because of its potential use as an emer~gency

25


EOD area. The Proposed Plan for OU 3,4,5 indicates that the landfill will be regulated underRCRA 3008a.


During the 1994 SWMP, four wells at LF04 were sampled to verify the absence of organiccontaminants and to monitor metals concentrations. Diesel range organics were detected atconcentrations ranging from 0.38 mgIL to 1.30 mgIL in all of the samples (Table 2-7). Theanalyses quantified chromatogram peaks for compounds with 10 to 24 carbons; however, thepeaks did not match the diesel pattern, and the origin of the hydrocarbons is not known.Gasoline range organics were detected at a concentration of 1.9 mg/L in the sample from well04MW07. The chrornatogram peaks do not match the gasoline pattern, but appear to betoluene. Toluene was detected in the sample from this well at a concentration of 290 p,~/L(Table 2-4). The compound 3.4-methylphenol was detected in all samples at estimatedconcentrations of I pig/L to 42 Hg/L . 2-methylphenol was also detected in the sample from04MW07 at 10 4ggL. Metals concentrations at LF04 with the exception of those of arsenic andiron, and barium in several samples, were generally within the range of the 1994 backgroundvalues for the lowland area.

1995 Proposed Work

No work is proposed for this landfill under the 1995 SWMP. Work is ongoing during fieldseason 1995 to sample soils in support of closure of the landfill under RCRA. A separateproject to remove drums and debris is also being conducted.

2.8 01)6 SKI LODGE WELL CONTAMINATION

Refer to:Figure 2-19 0U6 Ski Lodge Area (from 0U6 ROD)Table 2-4 Volatile Organic Compounds in OU/S ER Groundwater Samples from

the 1994 SWMP (from Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program1994 Report, Battelle)

Table 2-5 Total Metals in QUISER Groundwater Samples from the 1994 SWMPrfroin Site wide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report,Battelle PNL)

Table 2-21 0U6 Results of Organic Anal ytes in Groundwater (from 0U6 ROD)Table 2-22 0U6 Results of Organic Anal yres in Groundwater (from EAFB

Monitoring)

26

SWMP [995 Work Plan Eielson Air Force Base

Reference:0(16 ROD; 1994 Site wide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report

Site Setting

0U6 is a single source area at the ski hill facility in the southeast portion of the base. Fuelstorage tanks were formerly located at the top of the ski hill; the tanks were removed in 1977.Dissolved fuel compounds are present in groundwater samples collected from monitoring wellson the hillside and from supply wells and monitoring wells near the bottom of the hill.Groundwater movement in the aquifer at 0U6 is difficult to characterize because of thegeologically complex setting. The higher elevations of the ski hill area are underlain by schistbedrock, and the alluvial aquifer at the base of the hill contains discontinuous permafrost

The ROD for 0U6 was signed in September 1994. The selected remedy for 0U6 was to supplysafe drinking water to the ski lodge facility and to use institutional controls to prevent access tothe groundwater in the area of the CU. Groundwater monitoring will be conducted to recordconcentrations of fuel contaminants in the aquifer.

Monitoring wells and former supply wells in the ski hill area have been used to collect samplesto monitor the contaminants in groundwater. Sample collection from the wells at 0U6 islogistically difficult because of the permafrost conditions in the alluvial aquifer and the deepunsaturated zone in the bedrock aquifer. A submersible pump was stuck in the well casing at38M01 during the August 1994 sampling event.

EA previously scoped the effort required to rehabilitate two damaged supply wells (8621 and8626) to make them available for sampling,. This work is proposed for the field season 1995.


During the 1994 SWMP, seven wells at WP38 (the ski lodge) were sampled to monitorcontaminant concentrations. Benzene was detected in two of the samples, at 400 pig/L at Well38M01I and 20 ~ig/L at 38SLW (the former water supply well). Benzene was detected in thesewells in 1993 at concentrations of 910/,ggL and 140 H/jL, respectively. The benzeneconcentrations in wells 38M0 I and 38SLW exceed the MCL of 5 pug/L. Metals concentrationswere generally higher than the 1994 background range for the lowland area, particularly insamples from wells 38M02, 38M06, and 38M 1 6. However, these samples were extremelysilty.

Quarterly monitoring of seven wells was planned for the period from August 1994-August1995. Some of the results to date are shown in Table 2-22. TCE was detected in well 38M07in March of 1995.

27


1995 Proposed Work

Selected wells in the lower elevations of the ski hill area will be sampled and the samplesanalyzed for fuel compounds and solvents. The proposed wells and analytical methods areshown in Table 2- 1.

Wells 8626 and 8621 were drilled and completed as supply wells; both contain supply pumpsthat have been disabled but are thought to be intact. The pumps will be wired and the supplylines replumbed to permit sample collection while still preventing unauthorized access to thegroundwater. Well 8626 is frozen, but it contains a loop of heat tape. The heat tape will beoperated to attempt to thaw the well.

2.9 SERl SITES

Samples were collected from five SER sites as part of the 1994 SWrMP. Two of these sites(LFO I and DP55) underwent a limited field investigation (LFI) in 1993. Results are reportedin Source Evaluation Report, Phase 2 Investigation, Limited Field Investigation (USAF1994b). The other three sites (LFO5, ST16, and SS47) were assessed in Source EvaluationReport, Phase L, Final (USAF 1993 Q.

2.9.1 LFO1 Original Base Landfill and Drum Storage Area

Refer to:Figure 2-20 LFOI Original Base Landfill and Drum Storage Area (from Source

Evaluation Report, Phase 2 Investigation, Battelle-PNL)Figure 2-21 LEO! Original Base Landfill and Drum Storage area showing removal

and cleanup detail (from Source Evaluation Report, Phase 2Investigation, Battelle-PNL)

Table 2-5 Total Metals in OU/SER Groundwater Samples from the 1994 SWMP(from Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report,Battelle PNL, Januarv 1995)

Table 2-23 LFOI Original Base Landfill and Drum Storage Area GroundwaterA nalvtical Results (from Source Evaluation Report, Phase 2Investigation, Battelle-PNL)

Table 2-24 LEO! Original Base Landfill and Drum Storage Area WellConstruction Information (from Source Evaluation Report. Phase 2Investigation, Battelle-PNL)

28

SWMP 1995 Work Plan Nielson Air Force Base

Reference:OU 3,45 Proposed PlanSource Evaluation Report, Phase 2 Investigation, Battelle-PNL

Site Settin2

The LF0l site is located between the Richardson Highway and Piledriver Slough. LFO Iincludes an abandoned landfill and a drum disposal area. The landfill was used throughout the1950's and received domestic and base operations waste, including garbage, lumber, metal,construction debris, and empty cans. Waste oil, solvents, and paint residues were alsoreportedly disposed in the landfill. The landfill was covered with a cap in 1960, but somerefuse is still visible.

There is no historical record of use of the drum storage area. In 1992, approximately 2500open, rusting drums were removed from the area and disposed of in the Borough landfill.


Limited investigations of contaminants in the soil and groundwater at the site have found nocontaminants that pose unacceptable risks to human health or the environment.

Groundwater contamination was not identified at LFO I (Landfill 01) during the SERinvestigation. One groundwater sample was collected in 1994 and analyzed for metals tomonitor water quality down gradient of the landfill.

Metals concentrations are comparable to the 1994 background values. The results from Well01M04 are similar to or less than those at adjacent background wells OIMOI and 01M02. TheLFO I source area was recommended for no further action in the OU 3,4,5 Proposed Plan.

1995 Proposed Work

No work is proposed for this landfill under the 1995 SWMIP.

2.9.2 LFOS Old Army Landfill

Refer to:Fig tre 2-22 LFO5 Old Armyv Landfill location (from SER Phase!I Final Report.

Battelle-PNL)Table 2-5 Total Metals in OU/SER Groundwater Samiples from the 1994 SWMP

(from Sitevwide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report,Battelle PNL, January 1995)

29


Table 2-25 LFOS Old Army Landfill analyses completed (from SER Phase I FinalReport, Battelle-PNL)

Table 2-26 LF0S Old Army' Landfill analytical results (from SER Phase I FinalReport, Battelle-PNL)

Reference:SER Phase I Final Report, Battelle-PNL

Site Setting

LFO5 is located approximately on EAFB property, 1.5 miles south-southeast of the south endof the base runway, 0.4 mile east of Richardson Highway. The source area is an old Armylandfill used by the Army battery station from 1956 to 1959. Information about the landfill islimited; the landfill probably received small quantities of waste oils and spent solvents, inaddition to general debris and scrap materials. Previous site reconnaissance indicated that as of1989 there were 650 to 950 drums at the site in shallow ponds. EAFB removed surfacematerials in 1993 to minimize potential for future unauthorized dumping.


Limited investigations of contaminants in the soil and groundwater at the site have found nocontaminants that pose unacceptable risks to human health or the environment. Concentrationsof chlorinated compounds and metals have been detected in the past in groundwater from thewells at LFO5. Lead was detected at 15 uig/l_ in a 1988 sample collected from well O5MOLILead was not detected in a 1993 sample from this well (USAF 1993e). LFO5 has beenrecommended for no further action.

Groundwater from one well (05MOI) was sampled during the 1994 SWMP. The sample wasanalyzed for metals. Metals concentrations in the sample are comparable to the 1994background values.

1995 Proposed Work

Groundwater from one well (05MO I) is proposed for sampling during the 1995 SWMIP. Thesample will be analyzed for metals. The proposed wells and analytical methods are shown inTable 2-1.

30


2.9.3 ST16 MOGAS Fuel Line Spill

Refer to:Figure 2-23 ST16 MOGAS Fuel Line Spilt location (from SER Phase I Final

Report, Battelle-PNL)Figure 2-24 ST16 MOGAS Fuel Line Spill sample locations (from SER Phase I

Final Report, Battelle-PNL)Table 2-4 Volatile Organic Compounds in QUISER Groundwater Samples from

the 1994 SWMP (from Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program1994 Report, Battelle PNL, January' 1995)

Table 2-27 STI6 MOGAS Fuel Line Spill analytical results (from SER Phase IFinal Report, Battelle-PNL)

Reference:SER Phase I Final Report, Battelle-PNL 1993

Site Setting

ST]16 is located 100 ft east of Industrial Drive near Building 6214. A MOGAS fuel line isburied 5 to 6 ft below grade and runs along Industrial Drive. The line carries product from theE-2 fuel storage facility to the BX gas station.

A release of MOGAS estimated to be 5000 gallons occurred at the carpenter shop circa 1954.No other spills of fuel have been recorded. A RCRA inspection in 1986 found improperlylabeled drums at the carpenter shop. The drums probably contained paint and solvents; theyhave since been removed.


Results of groundwater sample analysis conducted in 1986 indicated that some fuelcontaminants were present in the groundwater samples. The narrative in the SER Phase I FinalReport indicates that the field QC blanks for this sampling event contained contaminants atleast as high as those measured in the environmental sample at STI 6. The results for theenvironmental samples may not be valid.

One groundwater sample was collected during the 1994 SWMIP and analyzed for VOCs toverify the absence of fuel-related contamination. Toluene was detected at a concentration of1.8 pg/Ll in the sample from Well 16-2.

Source area ST 16 has been recommended for no further action.

3 1


1995 Proposed Work

Groundwater from one well is proposed for sampling during the 1995 SWMP. The proposedwells and analytical methods are shown in Table 2-1.

2.9.4 SS47 Commissary Parking Lot Fuel Spill

Refer to:Figure 2-25 SS47 Commissary' Parking Lot Fuel Spill location (from SER Phase I

Final Report, Battelle-PNL 1993)Figure 2-26 SS47 Comm issary Parking Lot Fuel Spill sample locations (from SER

Phase I Final Report, Battelle-PNL 1993)Table 2-28 SS47 Commissary Parking Lot Fuel Spill analytical results (from SER

Phase I Final Report, Battelle-PNL)

Reference:SF1? Phase I Final Report, Battelle-PNL 1993

Site Settin2

The Commissary parking lot fuel spill was identified in October 1987 during a preconstructionsoil investigation related to an addition to the Commissary building. The nature and source ofthe release is not known. No spills or leaks have been found or reported from any of threenearby fuel storage tanks.


Lead was detected above the MCL of 15 Agg/L in groundwater samples collected at SS47 in1988. Elevated lead was not confirmed in a sample collected from Well 47M05 in 1993(USAF 1993e). During the 1994 SWMP, groundwater samples were collected from wells47MG I (located at the up gradient edge of the parking lot), 47M03, and 47M05. The sampleswere analyzed for lead to verify lead concentrations and identify a possible up gradient sourceof lead. The sample from Well 4'7M05 was also analyzed for VOCs to verify the absence ofBTEX.

No fuel-related VOCs were detected in the 1994 groundwater samples from the wells at SS47.Lead was detected at a maximum concentration of 16 pg/L at SS47, which is within the rangeof 1994 background values.

32


1995 Proposed Work

Groundwater from three wells are proposed for sampling during the 1995 SWMP. Theproposed wells and analytical methods are shown in Table 2-1

2.9.5 DP55 Birch Lake Recreation Area

Refer to:Figure 2-27 DP55 Birch Lake Recreation Area location (from Source Evaluation

Report, Phase 2 Investigation, Battelle-PNL)Table 2-29 DP55 Birch Lake Recreation Area groundwater analytical results

summary (from Source Evaluation Report, Phase 2 Investigation,Battelle-PNL)

Reference:SER Phase 2 Final Oct 94

Site Setting

DP55 is a refuse pile directly adjacent to the maintenance yard at the recreation site at BirchLake. Birch Lake and DP55 are located approximately 36 miles south of EAFB, close to theRichardson Highway. The refuse area has been used in the past to dispose of wastes generatedin the maintenance and operation of the recreation area. Based on historical information,materials used at the area include vehicle maintenance supplies, including fuel and solvents,insecticides for mosquito control, paint, wood preservatives, and varnish, and householdrefuse.

SER site DP55 (Birch Lake Recreation Area) has been recommended for no further action inthe 01J3.4,5 Proposed Plan.


No contamination has been found at DP55 that poses an unacceptable risks to human health orthe environment. EAFB Bioenvironmental personnel collected monthly water quality samplesfrom the drinking water supply at DP55 during the period from August 1989 to August 1990.The results of the analysis are summarized in Table 2-29. BTEX compounds were detected inthe water samples at concentrations lower than 10 ug/l.

One water sample from the supply well was collected and analyzed for VOCs during the 1994SWMP. Three VOCs, chloroform (17 pg/l-). bromodichloromethane (5.8 agLanddibromochloromethane (1.2 ug/L), were detected in the sample from the water supply well at

33


the Birch Lakes Recreation Area. These compounds were probably derived from the watertreatment system at the wellhead.

-1995 Proposed Work

One sample from the drinking water well will be collected and analyzed for metals and VOCsto monitor for the possible presence of contamination. The proposed wells and analyticalmethods are shown in Table 2-I1.

2.10 UST AREAS

Three UST areas will be monitored under the SWMP contract and work scope. The USTs aresubject to regulation under the ADEC UST regulations. Groundwater samples will becollected from monitoring wells and from at least one microwell, if the microwell can berelocated and reoccupied.

Background information about any previous investigation results is not included here.

The UST sites are:

UST at Building II146, Figure 2-28UST at Building 1307, Figure 2-29UST at Building 2375, Figure 2-30

The selected wells and groundwater analytical methods are shown in Table 2-1.

34

SWMP 1995 Work Plani Eielson Air Force Base

3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN

3.1 PROJECT SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES

Annual groundwater sampling and analysis is being performed at Eielson AFB to monitor siteconditions over time at EAFB. A thorough discussion is in Section 1 of this SAP.

3.2 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITY

3.1.1 Project Team Organization

The project team consists of USAF and EA personnel. An organization chart is shown below.

3.1.2 Key EA Personnel Responsibilities

The project will require a field investigative team and on- and off-site analytical support froman AFCEE approved laboratory. The following key individual assignments have been selectedto govern work efforts in this project:

Program Manager: Ken Kilmer

Project Manager: David Beistel

Corporate Quality Assurance Officer: David Santoro

Senior Technical Review: Gloria McCleary/Doug Oramn

Laboratory Quality Assurance Coordinator: Mimi Uhlfelder

Laboratory Project Manager: Thomas Randall

Health and Safety Manager: Clayton Bock

Site Safety and Health Officer: Olubunmi Ogunsola

Site Manager: Richard Gore

The Program Manager (PRM) is a senior business/technical manager who is responsible forproject oversight including assurance of client satisfaction, business and technical guidance tothe project manager and resource management within the EA project management system. Heserves as a resource and liaison with senior line and corporate management for both the USAFand the Delivery Order Manager (DOM) in problem solving, resource allocation, and qualitymatters. The PRM's responsibilities include direct communication and liaison with the PM andthe UTSAF.

35


The Project Manager (PM) has overall responsibility for the successful, timely, andcost-effective completion of the field investigation. These responsibilities specifically include:

* Management of all technical and quality control activities;* Preparation of work-flow diagrams, schedules, staff allocations, survey plans;

work plans, health and safety plans, and QAPPs;* Management of all project funds for labor and materials procurement;* Review and administration of all work order changes;* Establishment of a project records system;* Supervision of the performance of the delivery order team members toward

unified and productive goals;* Successful accomplishment of all contractual obligations including costs;

schedules, and technical performance under the assigned task;* Review and approval of all documentation and reports;* Formal and quality control of all documents and data reports.

The Corporate Oualitv Assurance Officer (CQAO) has overall responsibility for maintaining allaspects of EA's QA program including sampling, laboratory analysis, data processing, dataquality review, and audits. The CQAO has the authority and the responsibility to verifyconformance of technical disciplines to project requirements. The CQAO is independent of thedlelivery order team and has no direct responsibility for the technical aspects of studies subjectto his review. The principal duties and responsibilities are as follows:

* Develops and submits quality assurance policies;* Provides a program to orientate and train EA personnel in the implementation

of the Corporate Quality Assurance Program (CQAP);* Provides for the review of controlled quality-related documents for each

technical discipline to insure all applicable quality requirements are addressed;* Selects, supervises, and trains individuals to perform the audit function;* Periodically audits each engineering or environmental program, technical

service area;* Provides requested assistance to vice presidents, directors, managers and

supervisors on matters affecting quality of work:* Identifies the requirements of client. federal, state, and corporate QA policies

that are relevant to the project.

The Senior Technical Reviewers (STR) provide senior technical review for the implementationof the project. They are responsible for reviewing draft and final deliverables and areindependent of the day-to-day project work.

36


The Laboratory Quality Assurance Coordinator (LQAC) provides oversight of the qualityassurance function for all analytical work for this project. The LQAC is independent of theproduction responsibilities and has authority to enforce QC and corrective action procedures.Additional duties include:

* Manage AFCEE laboratory approval and applicable state laboratorycertifications;

* Coordinates with project team in development of the QAPP;* Oversees all external PE (Performance Evaluation) programs, following up with

corrective action plans for unacceptable scores;* Maintains EA Laboratories QA, SOP and Methods manuals;

* Responsible for review and approval of Nonconformance Reports (NCRs);* Conducts performance, systems and data audits;* Coordinates all inspections, provides written response to findings, and maintains

audit records;* Trains personnel on QC requirements and procedures, distributes quality related

information, procedural changes, and guidance to departmental personnel;* Assures subcontractor laboratories are compliant with the AECEE approved

QA program.

The Laboratory Proiect Manager (LPM) is responsible for the following tasks:

* Establish the first line of communication between the laboratory and projectpersonnel;

* Function as the laboratory representative on the project team;* Obtain, file, and distribute pertinent project information to the laboratory staff;

The Health and Safety Manager is responsible for approval of the Project Health and SafetyPlan (H-SP) and each amendment of the HSP, reviewing all health and safety documentation,providing technical support to the Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO), particularly: in themodification of site health and safety requirements or workplans, and establishing heat andcold stress prevention measures.

The Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO) is responsible for the following tasks:* Review and confirm personal protective clothing or respiratory protection

requirements;*1 Review all health and safety documentation;* Ensure that field personnel have the necessary health and safety training;* Provide site-specific training, as required, to all employees assigned to work at

the site;* Provide technical support to the Health and Safety Manager, particularly in the

modification of site health and safety requirements or work plans.

3.7


The Site Man~ager (SM) will be responsible for coordinating the field team for the collection ofsoil, sediment, surface water, and ground-water samples during the field investigation and thequalitative assessment of environmental conditions at the site as follows:

* Provide orientation and any necessary training to field personnel as to therequirements of the H-SP, SAP and WP prior to the start of work;

* Monitor sampling operations to ensure that sampling team members adhere tothe SAP and WP;

* Ensure the use of calibrated measurement and test equipment;* Establish and maintain a field records management system;* Coordinate activities with the DOM;* Oversee field data documentation and conduct quality checks on the

interpretative work product;* Check and validate completed field data collection forms;

* Review reports for compliance with relevant Federal, state, local, and USAFrequirements;

3.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE OBJECTIVES FOR MEASUREMENT DATA

The purpose of this QAPP is to ensure compliance with the objectives of the SWIMP, andprovide a standard for control and review of measurement data collected to ensure they arescientifically sound. defensible, and of known acceptable documented quality. Projectobjectives are:

* Scientific data generated will be of sufficient quality to withstand scientific andlegal scrutiny.

* Data will be gathered or developed in accordance with procedures appropriatefor their intended uses in the evaluation of health and environmental risksassociated with chemicals in the ground water, potential identification of thesource(s) of contamination, and remedial engineering feasibility evaluations.

* Data will be of sufficient quality for the intended use of the data which is tocreate a conceptual model of each site describing suspected source areas ofchemicals of concern, pathways of chemical migration, potential ecologic orhuman receptors, and any risk present to potential receptors.

* Data reporting limits will be sufficient to meet project ARAR requirements.

3.3.1 Definition of Criteria

The PARCC (precision, accuracy. representativeness, completeness and comparability)parameters are the characteristics of data quality. Table 3-1 lists the formulas used to calculateprecision, accuracy, and completeness.

38


3.3.1.1 Accuracy

Accuracy is the degree of agreement of a measured value with the true or expected value of themeasured quantity. It is a measure of the bias or systematic error of the entire data collectionprocess. Sources of these errors include the sampling process, field and laboratorycontamination, sample preservation and handling, sample matrix, sample preparation methods,and calibration and analysis procedures. Sampling accuracy is assessed by evaluating theresults of field/trip blanks, analytical accuracy through the use of calibration and methodblanks, calibration verification samples, laboratory control samples, and matrix spikes.

3.3.1.2 Precision

Precision is the mutual agreement among individual measurements of the same property and isa measure of the random error component of the data collection process. The overall dataprecision is a function of the sampling precision and the analytical precision. The samplingprecision is assessed by collecting field duplicates. The analytical precision is determined bypreparing and analyzing duplicate subsamples. Precision can be expressed in several differentways, each of which has its uses; for multiple measurements these include the standarddeviation, the relative standard deviation, and the range. For duplicates the precision isexpressed as the Relative Percent Difference (RPD).

3.3.1.3 Representativeness

Data representativeness is the degree to which data accurately and precisely represent acharacteristic of a population, parameter variations at a sampling point, or an environmentalcondition. Representativeness is a quantitative parameter that is most concerned with theproper design of the sampling program. The sampling program has been designed so that thesamples collected are as representative as possible of the medium being sampled and that asufficient number of samples will be collected. Representativeness is addressed by thedescription of the sampling techniques and the rationale used to select sampling locations.Representativeness is evaluated using RPD between field duplicates and collected samples.

3.3.1.4 Completeness

Completeness is defined as the percentage of measurements made that are judged to be validdata. To achieve this objective, every effort is made to avoid sample loss through accidents orinadvertence. Accidents during sample transport or lab activities which cause the loss of theoriginal sam pie will result in irreparable loss of data. Collection of sufficient sample allowsreanalysis in the event of an accident involving a sample aliquot. The assignment of a set ofcontinuous laboratory numbers to a batch of samples which have undergone chain-of-custodyinspection makes it more difficult for the analyst to overlook samples when setting up a batchof samples for analysis. The continuous laboratory numbers also make it easy during the data

39

SWMF 1995 Work Plan Eieison Air Force Base

compilation stage to pick out the samples which have not been analyzed and to order theiranalysis before the data are reported and before holding times have been exceeded. Thecompleteness of each batch of samples can be calculated by dividing the total number ofanalyses completed by the number that should have been performed on that batch times 100.

3.3.1.5 Comparability

Data comparability is a measure of the confidence with which one data set can be compared toanother. It cannot be described in quantitative terms, but must be considered in designing thesampling plans, analytical methodology, quality control, and data reporting. The use ofstandard sampling techniques and validated, EPA-approved analytical methods assure that theparameters being measured are comparable with data generated from other sources. Reportingof data in units used by other organizations also assures comparability.

3.3.2 Achievement of Goals

Table 3-2 identifies numerical goals for precision and accuracy for matrix spikes, matrix spikeduplicates, surrogates and laboratory control samples for the various parameter groups. Thecompleteness goal for measurement data is 90%.

3.4 SAMPLING PROCEDURES

The proposed tield activities will include:

* Collection of soil samples* Collection of ground-water samples from existing and new wells.* Geophysical surveys over selected locations.* Soil vapor surveys at selected locations.* Digging of test pits/trenches at selected locations.

3.4.1 Sampling Protocols

Protocols for sample collection, transport, and storage will be in accordance with the federal,state, and USAF Guidance Documents set forth in the FSP, presented in Section I of this SAP.

3.4.2 Sample Handling

Groundwater samples will be collected in accordance with the applicable documents listed inSection I of this SAP. A listing of sample containers, sample volumes, method ofpreservation, and holding times for groundwater samples are presented on Table 3-3.

40


3.5 SAMPLE CUSTODY

3.5.1 Field Operations

The environmental sampling that will be conducted during the field investigation is discussedin greater depth in the FSP.

3.5.2 Laboratory Operations

3.5.2.1 Sample Handling

After samples have been collected, labeled and the chain-of-custody forms initiated, the projectmanager completes the right side of the chain-of-custody form. This form provides sample-specific information and a listing of the parameters required on each sample, along with therequired analytical sensitivity. The chain-of-custody and appropriate field data sheets aresealed in a water-tight plastic envelope and shipped with the samples to the laboratory.

3.5.2.2 Sample Receipt and Logging

Upon receipt at the laboratory, the Sample Management Officer or designate custodian inspectsthe samples for integrity and checks the shipment against the chain-of-custody / analytical taskorder form. Cooler temperatures are checked and documented on the chain-of-custody. ThepH of preserved samples (except volatile organics) is measured and documented in the SamplepH Logbook which is maintained in the Sample Management Office (EAL-SOP-204). The pHof sample vials submitted for volatile organics determinations are checked by the analyst duringanalysis, and the pH is recorded in the instrument run logbook.

Discrepancies are addressed at this point, and documented on the chain-of-custody form andmust be resolved before samples are released to the laboratory for analysis. When theshipment and the chain-of-custody are in agreement, the custodian enters the samples into theAnalytical Custody and Preservation Log and assigns each sample a unique laboratory number.

This number is affixed to each sample bottle. The custodian then enters the sample andanalysis information into the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMIS). Theoriginal of the chain-of-custody form is given to the data management group, with a copy tothe laboratory operations manager. These log-in procedures are documented in EAL-SOP-035and EAL-SOP-036.

Samples. extracts, or digestates that are sent to another laboratory are transmitted using achain-of-cuistody form which includes: collection date and time, field and laboratoryidentification numbers, and requested analyses. In addition, copies of the sample preparationlogas are included for extracts and digestates to provide information on the preparation dates

4 1


and weights and volumes used.

3.5.2.3 Sample Storage and Security

While in the laboratory, the samples and aliquots that require storage at approximately 40 C aremaintained in a locked refrigerator unless they are being used for analysis. Samples forpurgeable organics determinations are stored in a dedicated refrigerator, separate from othersamples, sample extracts, and standards. The Sample Management Officer is responsible forsample storage and security. Specific tasks include:

* Samples and extracts are stored in a secure area. The sample custodian controlsaccess to the storage area. (Duplicate keys for locked storage areas are maintainedonly by the appropriate personnel.)

* Samples are removed from the shipping container and stored in their originalcontainers unless damaged. Damaged samples are disposed in an appropriatemanner after notifying the EA Project Manager and this disposal is documented.

* Whenever samples are removed from storage, this removal is documented. Alltransfers of samples are documented on internal chain-of-custody records.

* Samples and extracts are stored after completion of analysis in accordance with thecontract or until instructed otherwise by the Project Manager.

* VOA samples are stored separately from other samples.* Samples are not stored with standards or sample extracts,

3.5.2.4 Sample Tracking

Laboratory Managers/Supervisors use the LIMS and copies of the chain-of-custody records togenerate 'backlist" reports of unanalyzed samples. The information in these reports is sortedby analysis and laboratory sample number and includes the collection times along with theproject name, field sample identifications, and matrix. The supervisor prioritizes the samplesbased on holding times and assigns them on a daily basis to the analysts.

3.5.2.5 Sample Identification and Custody Records

The National Enforcement Investigations Center (NEIC) of U.S. EPA defines -custody ofevidence in the following ways:

* It is in your actual possession; or* It is in your view, after being in your physical possession; or* It was in your possession and then you locked or sealed it up to prevent tampering;

or* It is in a secure area.

4 2

SWMP 1995 Work Plan Fielson Air Force Base

So that the laboratory may satisfy sample chain-of-custody requirements, the followingstandard operating procedures for laboratory / sample security are implemented:

* Samples are stored in a secure area.* Access to the laboratory is through a monitored area. Other outside-access doors to

the laboratory are kept locked.* Visitors sign a visitor's log and are escorted while in the laboratory.* Refrigerators, freezers, and other sample storage areas are securely maintained or

locked.* Only the designated sample custodian and supervisory personnel have keys to

locked sample storage area(s).* Samples remain in secure sample storage until removed for sample preparation or

analysis.* All transfers of samples into and out of storage are documented.• Custody records are maintained in the Sample Management Office.

Samples, extracts, and digestates are routinely retained at the laboratory for 60 days after thefinal analytical data report has been forwarded to the client so that any analytical problems canbe addressed. The samples, extracts, and digestates are then discarded in accordance withguidance specified in EAL-SOP-072.

3.6 CALIBRATION PROCEDURES FOR FIELD TEST EQUIPMENT

Field instruments will be calibrated daily prior to the start of field sampling. Calibrationprocedures and frequency for field test equipment are discussed in the FSP.

3.7 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

3.7.1 Identification of Methods

The analytical methods (Table 3-4) for this project were selected to ensure data comparabilitywith previous monitoring data.

3.7.2 Detection and Quantitation Limits

A detection limit has been defined by the Committee on Environmental Improvement of theAmerican Chemical Society (ACS) (Anal. Chem. 55:2210-2218 (1983)) as "the lowestconcentration that can be determined to be statistically different from a blank." Variousmethods are available for determining detection limits; most of them are based on the standarddeviation of measurements in the region near the blank responses. The following detection

43


limits are determined routinely in the laboratory:

Instrument detection limits (IDL) are determined using the protocols given in the inorganic andorganic statements of work for the U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program; the procedures andcalculations are detailed in EAL-SOP-047 and -048. A standard deviation is calculated fromreplicate measurements of a low-level standard and multiplied by three to give the IDL. IDLsare used as an index of instrument performance that does not include sample effects and,therefore, represent the lowest detection limit achievable. IDLs can vary between instrumentsof the same type and can change when redetermined.

Method detection limits (MDL) are determined using the U.S. EPA procedure published in 40CFR 136 Appendix B (EAL-SOP-049). The MDL is defined as "the minimum concentrationof a substance that can be measured and reported with 99%7 confidence that the analvteconcentration is greater than zero and is determined from analysis of a sample in a givenmnatrix containing the anal yte. " This procedure requires that "all sample processing steps ofthe analytwical method be included in the determination of the method detection limit.'" MDLstherefore are influenced by the sample matrix and sample preparation process as well as theanalytical instrumentation. A minimum of seven replicates spiked at one to five times theexpected MDL are analyzed. The MDL is calculated by multiplying the standard deviation ofthe measurements by the Student t-value for a 99% confidence level. Because of the widevariety of matrix types analyzed by the laboratory, MDLs are routinely determined only inreagent water. These MDLs represent, therefore, the optimum values, and the MDLs foractual sample matrices are likely to be higher. When interpreting data and detection limits it isimportant to remember that, wh~en a measured concentration is greater than the detection limit,the analyte has the specified probability of actually being present (i.e., of having a trueconcentration greater than zero); however, the detection limit cannot be used to say anythingabout the presence or absence of an analyte that has a measured concentration less than thedetection limit. From the definition of the MDL there is only a 1% chance that a sample withno analyte will produce a concentration greater than or equal to the MDL (false positive). Theprobability is 50%, however, that a sample with a concentration at the MDL will be measuredas less than the MDL (false negative).

It is also important when interpreting low-level data to consider the precision of measurementsclose to the detection limit The relative standard deviation (six) of a value at the NIDL is 32%17,and the 3o; limits are the MDL ± MDL. For a sample with an analyte concentration at theMDL. 50% of the time the measured value will be less than the MDL and 50%7 of the timebetween the MDL and 3 x MDL.

Reporting Limits: While MDLs define the level at which a target compound can be detected,reporting limits (RL) are defined as the level at which a compound can be qualified with anacceptable degree of confidence. Also called practical quantitation limits, PQLs, RLs are usedby EA Laboratories when reporting data. RLs are established based upon the MDL and the

44

SWIMP 1995 Work Plan Eielson Air Force Base

sensitivity of the analytical technique. Per AFCEE TAP requirements, the RL is verified with alow level calibration standard at a concentration less than the AFCEE PQL. The laboratoryRI-s for this project are listed in Table 3-5.

3.7.3 Method Calibration

Instruments and equipment used by EA are controlled by a formal calibration program. Theprogram verifies that equipment is of the proper type, range, accuracy, and precision to providedata compatible with specified requirements. All instruments and equipment that measure aquantity, or whose performance is expected at a stated level, are subject to calibration.

3.7.3.1 Standard Receipt and Use Documentation

Primary standards are obtained as either neat materials, which are used to prepare stockstandard solutions or as prepared solutions, which are used as the stock standards. Records aremaintained on the primary standards that include date of receipt. source, purity, compositionalinformation, storage conditions, and expiration date. All primary standards are traceable toNIST or vendor certified. The preparation of stock, intermediate, and working standardsolutions is recorded in standards preparation logbooks, which are specified to therequirements of each operational group. Each stock, intermediate, and working standard isassigned a number that is used to trace the preparation from stock to working standards and toreference the analysis of the standards. The logbooks are completed by the appropriateanalysts as they prepare the standards and are reviewed by the supervisor. Working standardsare labeled with complete information on preparation date, concentration of each compound,solvent, preparer's name, expiration date, and logbook where information on the standard isrecorded. Measurements made during standards preparation (e.g-., from weighing operations)are also recorded.

3.7.3.2 Laboratory Calibration Procedures

Two types of calibrations are performed by EA Laboratories: physical and chemical. Physicalcalibration refers to physical measurements that are made on apparatus or equipment to verifyor provide corrections to the observed data. The physical calibrations performed on laboratoryequipment are given in Table 3-6. Physical calibrations are documented on data sheets that aredesigned for each specific application. The information recorded includes, as a minimum:date, analyst, instrument identification, identification of reference standard, expected values,measured values, and correction factors (if applicable).

Chemical calibration or standardization refers to those operations in which instrument response(in its broadest interpretation) is related to analyte concentration.

45


3.8 DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION, AND REPORTING

3.8.1 Data Reduction

Data reduction includes all processes that change either the values or numbers of data items.Data reduction processes include the calculation of sample concentrations from instrumentresponses and computation of quality control and statistical parameters (Table 3- 1).

3.8.1.1 Field Reportable Data

Entry of raw field data into computer or onto paper records is performed by field personnel ora data coordinator for large projects.

3.8.1.2 Laboratory Reportable Data

Raw laboratory data are converted to sample concentrations using the formulas in Table 3-7.The calculations are either performed by computerized data systems interfaced to theinstruments, manually using calculators, or using programs on stand-alone computers.

The analysts are responsible for the reduction of the raw data that they generate. The specificduties of the analysts include:

* Reduce all raw data generated to reportable values.* Initial review of analytical and quality control data.* Manual calculations and transfer onto forms and into LIMS data base.* Prepare computer files for instrumental calculations.* Generate data package* Copy relevant forms and logs for inclusion in data package.* Submit the data package to supervisor for review.

For non-instrumental methods and instruments without computerized data systems that requiremanual calculations, the analyst per-forming the analysis enters the bench-g-enerated data into abound laboratory workbook with form-specific instrumental responses (absorbances, percenttransmittances, etc.), standard and spike concentrations, sample numbers, and any otherpertinent information. The workbooks are under the control of the group supervisors who areresponsible for their security.I

For instruments that are directly coupled to computerized data systems. the raw data areinstrument responses in the form of printer output, chromatograms, integrator output, orcomputer-generated data files. The chromatograms and printer output are filed by samplebatch. The data files are archived on disk or magnetic tape. Computer data files are identifiedby unique, sequential descriptors which are cross-referenced in the run logs to the analysissequence.

46


Chromnatogramns and strip chart recordings are labeled with the following information, at aminimum:

* sample identification (laboratory sample number, standard or QC sampledescription)

* date and time of analysis* instrument identification* analyst* operational parameters (e.g.. temperatures, volumes, columns) when applicable* data file identification (for computerized systems)* positively identified compounds (for manual chromatograms)

3.8.2 Data Quality Assessment (Data Integrity)

Data integrity refers to how well the data produced represent the process of interest. Integrityis assured if the data are reported as the result of procedures that ensured that proper samplingand analysis methods were selected, the methods were followed correctly, the results were notcompromised as a result of intentional or accidental reporting of incorrect values, and recordswere maintained so as to document the procedures used.

3.8.2.1 Field Activities

Field records are evaluated by the field supervisor for the following, at a minimum:

* completeness* identification of valid samples* identification of anomalous field test data* accuracy and precision of the field data and measurements

The review of field record completeness checks that all requirements for field activities in thestudy plan have been fulfilled, that complete records exist for each field activity, and that theprocedures specified in the study plan have been implemented. Field documentation mustensure sample integrity and provide sufficient information to recreate each field event. Theresults of the completeness check are documented, and any data affected by incomplete recordsare identified in the technical report.

The identification of valid samples involves interpreting and evaluating the field records todetect problems affecting representativeness of field samples. For example, field records canindicate whether a well is properly constructed; pumping records can indicate properstabilization of measured water parameters. Field audits are another source of data for review.The judgements concerning sample validity will be documented in the technical report andfield data associated with poor or incorrect field work identified.

47


Anomalous field data will be identified and explained to the extent possible in the technicalreport. Examples of such data include a well temperature that is higher than that in any otherwell, or widely differing aquifer characteristics from test data obtained at several wells.Similarly, differences in well depths from construction records compared to fieldmeasurements are evaluated and explained. The assessment of the quality of fieldmeasurements is based on the instrument calibration records and any corrective action reports.

3.8.2.2 Laboratory Activities

Data assessment is initially performed by the responsible analyst. The data are checked forerrors in transcription, calculations, and dilution factors and for compliance with quality controlrequirements. Failure to meet method performance quality control criteria results in reanalysisof the sample or lot. After the initial review is completed, the data are collected from summarysheets, workbooks, or computer files and assembled into a data package.

The next level of data review is the prime responsibility of the laboratory QC Chemists whoreview all data packages against method and project performance criteria. The areas addressedinclude the following:

* Proper chain-of-custody and sample handling procedures followed* Parametric holding times met* Samples prepared and analyzed according to specified methods* Instrumentation calibrated according to specified methods* Spike (surrogate or standard) recoveries within specified ranges* Blanks prepared and analyzed as required* Calculations performed correctly and verified* Transcription of raw and final data correct* Sample detection limits determined correctly and within required limit.

A checklist is completed and signed by the analyst, QC Chemist and Laboratory Supervisor.Any problems discovered during the review and the correction actions necessary to resolvethem are communicated to the responsible laboratory manager, who discusses the findings withthe LQAC for final approval.

3.8.3 Data Validation and Data Reporting

3.8.3.1 Data Validation

Data validation is a systematic process of reviewing data against a set of criteria to identifyoutliers or errors and to delete suspect values or to flag them. The data review is performedfrom the perspective of the end-users, and is evaluated against the intended use as defined byproject specific Data Quality Objectives.

48

SWMP 1995 Work Plan Eielson Air Force Ease

Field Data Validation: Validation of the field data is the prime responsibility of the ProjectManager and project QA officer, who address the following areas:

* Proper Chain-of-Custody, sample handling, and decontamination proceduresfollowed.

* Samples collected according to specified methods.* Field instrumentation calibrated according to specified methods.* Quality control samples (e.g., blanks, replicates) collected as required.* Field data sheets and logbooks completed and in agreement with sample container

labels and Chain-of-Custody forms.

The data collected in the field is reviewed to qualitatively characterize its representativeness.Wells that were not fully purged or wells with poor well conditions are identified in thesummary report. Any suspect field measured data are flagged.

Lahoratory Data Validation: No third party data validation will be performed for this project.The DOM is responsible for assessing the usability of the data set as defined by project specificData Quality Objectives.

3.8.3.2 Data Reporting and Storage

Laboratory Reports: Completed data packages are approved for release by the LaboratoryManagers. They are then submitted to the laboratory Reports Group and included in the reportfile. After all data packages have been received by the Reports Group, a draft report isformatted to be consistent with the requirements of the project and is reviewed by the ReportsSupervisor to ensure compliance with format and content specifications. The draft report isthen submitted to the appropriate Laboratory Managers for certification of the results. Ifapproved, the LM will sign the analytical narrative.

The draft is then sent to the Laboratory Project Manager who review the report against allproject requirements. If acceptable, the cover letter is signed, and returned to the ReportsSupervisor who forwards the report to the Project Manager.

Electronic Data Reporting Electronic data deliverables will meet the requirements of theEielson AFIB BEAR GIS software.

Project Reports: Project technical reports vary greatly, depending on the size and nature of theproject. A report can include any of the following, as required:

* title and signature page* project backgroundlprevious work* summary of field and laboratory data

49


* discussion of results* site maps and photographs* conclusions/recommended actions* suggestions for future work

3.8.3.3 Data Storage

Within EA. all data and records are maintained in a secure manner. Project related hard copyinformation is maintained in the central files, which are the responsibility of the EA OfficeAdministrator.

The DOM is responsible for maintaining the project records in a secure and organized manner.Project personnel may maintain a working file (copies of the originals) for their daily use. Alloriginal documentation is indexed and cataloged for easy retrieval and inventory. Original datanot under the Control of the project manager (e.g., analytical, subcontractor) will be referencedas to location and the individual responsible for maintaining the data. A typical project filecould include the following:

* financial/insurance records* contractual agreements, including modifications* statement of work* correspondence (internal and external)* subcontractor agreements* proposal* project reports (progress, status, final)* work/sampling/QA plans* drawings and specifications* computer disks/tapes* QA and QC reports* construction requirements* field records (e.g., logbooks, boring logs, data sheets, photographs)* reference log (location of other data, i.e., analytical data)

Analytical data are maintained in a secure manner either within EA Laboratories or in an off-site location. Project-related hard copy information is maintained in the Central Project Files,which are the responsibility of the Office Administrator. The procedures used to organize,maintain, and archive the Central Project Files are detailed in EAL-SOP-196.

The central files include project statements of work or proposals, correspondence to and fromthe client, chain-of-custody records, quality assurance plans, final data reports, and referencesas to where laboratory backup data can be located in the laboratory or in archives. Theanalytical data reports are filed by report number in a separate section of the central files and

50


contain all documentation sent to the client as well as all backup information on the analyses.The central files do not include laboratory notebooks, strip charts, instrument logbooks, orcomputer disks/tapes, which are stored within the responsible operational groups. When aproject is complete, the project files and other related data are checked, inventoried, and putinto the archive system. A unique box number is assigned to each archive box and entered intothe archive file on the LAN system; the contents of each box are also listed in the file. Unlesssuperseded by program, project, or client specific requirements, the disposal date of thearchived files is seven years from the archive date. Archives are maintained in a secure off-sitewarehouse.

Electronic data on magnetic tapes or disks are maintained for a period of three years. Theproject and laboratory managers are responsible for ensuring that all electronic data is stored toprevent deterioration and that records are maintained identifying the tape/disk, archive date,and discard date.

When the project is completed, it is the responsibility of the DOM to review the files forcompleteness and to prepare the files to be placed in the office archives, which is a secure areawithin the office or a warehouse Standard, one cubic-foot archive boxes are used for packingfiles. When a box has been packed, a preprinted, pre-numbered label is filled in and attachedto it for cataloging purposes. Each box has the same kind of files and the same scheduleddestruction date. The unique box numbers are the primary mechanism for identifying andretrieving archived files. An inventory of the contents of each box is created which is cross-referenced to the box number. Three copies of the inventory are made: one copy goes into thebox; one into the department inventory file; and one to the Facilities Services Group, foraddition to the archive database.

The office administrators are responsible for maintaining the archives and for handling requestsfor archived files,

3.9 INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL CHECKS

3.9.1 Field Quality Control

Field quality control is discussed in Section 4 of this SAP.

3.9.2 Laboratory Quality Control Samples

An important part of analytical quality control is quality control samples, which are introducedinto the measurement process to evaluate laboratory method performance and samplemeasurement bias. Control samples can be prepared from environmental samples or beLenerated from standard materials in the laboratory. QC samples for this project are discussed

5 1


below, and Table 3-8 lists the quality control requirements.

3.9.2.1 Blanks

Blanks are materials that are as free of target analytes as possible and that are introduced atvarious stages during sample processing to monitor possible contamination introduced by thevarious operations.

A calibration blank is an organic or aqueous solution that contains all the reagents andsolvents in the same proportions as those used to prepare the calibration standards. Calibrationblanks are used in the preparation of calibration curves.

A method blank is a volume of deionized laboratory water for water samples or a purified solidmatrix for soil/sediment samples that is carried through the entire sample preparation andanalysis scheme as if it were an environmental sample. The method blank volume or weightwill be approximately equal to the sample volumes or sample weights being processed.Method blanks are used to monitor interferences caused by contaminants in solvents, reagents,glassware, and other sample processing hardware. They are also called reagent blanks andpreparation blanks.

Amethod blank is prepared and analyzed with each analytical batch of 20 or less samples.

3.9.2.2 Verification (Check) Solution

A calibration verification solution (quality control check standard) is a standard solution,prepared independently of the calibration standards, that is used to verify the accuracy of thecalibration standards.

3.9.2.3 Laboratory Control Sample

A laboratory control sample (LCS) is an aqueous or solid control sample of knowncomposition which is analyzed using the same sample preparation, reagents, and analyticalmethods employed for field samples. An LCS is obtained from an outside source or isprepared in the laboratory by spiking reagent water or a clean solid matrix from a stocksolution that is different than that used for the calibration standards. The LCS is used todemonstrate whether the sample preparation and analytical steps are in control, apart fromsample matrix effects. LCSs are also called quality control reference samples. method blankspikes and laboratory fortified blanks. The LCS contains the project specific analytes ofconcern for multi-analyte methods. For methods, such as the determination of ammonia inaqueous samples by automated colorimetry, in which the samples are not subjected to anyprocessing steps that are not done to the standards, the laboratory control sample andverification standard are the same and are not separately prepared.

52

SWM1P 1995 Work Plan Eielson Air Force Base

3.9.2.4 Spikes

A spike is a sample to which is added a known amount of analyte(s) before analysis. From theconcentrations of the analyte in the spiked and unspiked samples a percent recovery iscalculated. Many samples exhibit matrix effects in which other sample components interferewith the determination of the analyte. The value of the percent recovery indicates the extent ofthe interference.

A matrix spike is prepared by adding an analyte to a subsample of a field sample before samplepreparation and analysis. Matrix spikes indicate the performance of the entire method in thegiven matrix. For multi-analyte methods a representative suite of the analytes is used in thematrix spike.

An analivucal spike is prepared by adding analyte to an aliquot of a processed sample prior toanalysis. They are used to determine whether the analysis system is in control when a matrixspike is outside its limits.

3.9.2.5 Replicates

Replicate samples are divided into two or more portions at some step in the measurementprocess. Each portion is then carried through the remaining steps of the process. Replicatesamples provide information on the precision of the operations involved.

Method duplicates are a pair of subsanmples from a field sample that are taken through theentire preparation and analysis scheme. They indicate the precision of the entire method in thegiven matrix. Under AFCEE QA protocols, organic methods, the matrix spike is duplicated,providing a matrix spike duplicate. Matrix spike duplicates are prepared for every analyticalbatch of 20 or fewer samples.

Analytical duplicates are prepared by taking two aliquots of a processed sample and analyzingthem in the same manner. They are used to monitor the precision of the analysis system for theprocessed matrix.

3.9.2.6 Surrogates

Surrogates are organic compounds that are similar to the analytes of interest in chemicalcomposition, extraction, and chromatography, but are not normally found in environmentalsamples. These compounds are spiked into all blanks, standards, samples, and spiked samplesprior to purging or extraction in order to monitor preparation and analysis of samples.Generally, surrogates are used in chromatographic organic analyses but not in inorganicanalyses. Surrogate spike recoveries must fall within the control limits specified in the methodor program. Surrogate recoveries are not calculated if sample dilution causes the surrogate

53


concentration to fall below the quantitation limit.

3.9.2.7 Performance Evaluation Samples

Performance evaluation (PE) samples are standard reference materials or QC samples ofknown concentration obtained from the EPA, or a commercial source. The analysis of PEsamples monitors method accuracy.

Blind performance samples (quality control check samples) are PE samples for which theanalyte concentrations are unknown to the analysts. They are used as part of external andinternal performance audits. The laboratory analyzes blind PE samples as part of its laboratorycertification efforts. Samples from the EPA water supply and water pollution studies areanalyzed semiannually for laboratory certification programs. The results of the analysis of PEsamples are maintained by the QA manager. The laboratory supervisors are required toinvestigate and response to any results that are outside the control limits.

Known performance samples are obtained from the same sources as those described above,but are used by the analyst to check the accuracy of an analytical procedure prior to analysis ofsamples. These are particularly applicable when a minor revision has been made to ananalytical procedure or instrument.

3.9.3 Control Limits

Control limits for accuracy and precision are calculated from LCS recoveries to monitormethod performance. The limits are updated annually or when the method is changedsignificantly. Table 3-9 gives the formulas for the calculation of accuracy and precision limits.

3.10 PERFORMANCE AND SYSTEM AUDITS

Audits are systematic checks to determine the quality of operation of some activity or function.Audits are of two types: system and performance.

3.10.1 System Audits

ISystem audits are onsite qiwualiatve inspection and reviews of the quality assurance systemused by some part of or the entire measurement system.

3.10.1.1 Internal System Audits

Internal system audits of field activities are conducted by the Corporate Quality AssuranceOfficer. The audits are performed against a set of requirements, which may be the SAP, an

54


SOP, or the project statement of work. A checklist is generated from these requirements andbecomes the basis for the audit. The results of any deficiencies noted during the audit aresummarized in an audit report.

System audits of general laboratory operations are conducted by teams that consist of, at aminimum, an audit team leader and an auditor. The audit team leader, usually the LQAC, isresponsible for all the activities of a specific audit including organization, implementation,completion. and reporting. The audit team may also include a technical assistant who providestechnical expertise and assistance to the team on a specific task or function.

First, the scope of the audit is established; for example, whether to review a certain project or aparticular operation group, or to investigate a problem or an ongoing problem area. To ensurethat the scope of the audit is accomplished and that the audit follows established procedures, achecklist is developed before each audit.

The audit checklist is used to identify compliance of sample handling, analysis, testing, andmanagement of the resulting data. Questions are developed to establish the degree to whichprescribed quality control procedures are being implemented. The checklist is reviewed withthe appropriate project staff who supply evidence that procedures are followed as stated. Theresponses to each checklist item during the audit is noted as satisfactory, unsatisfactory, or notapplicable with explanations of the notation made, as applicable.

Following each audit, the lead auditor prepares an Audit Finding Report. Identifyingdeficiencies and recommending corrective actions. The report is submitted to the DOM,CQAO, and LQAC, as appropriate, and the Manager of the audited group. The completedreport for each audit is maintained by the DOM and a copy is placed in project files.

3.10.1.2 External System Audits

External system audits may be conducted by representatives of oversight agencies tosupplement the quality assurance record for a project. Such audits are arranged with EA,approved by the client, and result in an audit report provided to EA. EA responds to requiredremedial actions identified in external audit reports with a corrective action plan. The resultsof these audits are included in the QA summary for the project.

3.10.1.3 Performance Audits

Performance audits are independent sample checks made to arrive at a quantitative measure ofthe quality of the data produced by one section or the entire measurement process.Performance audits are conducted by introducing control samples, in addition to those usedroutinely, into the data production process. These control samples may include:

55

SWMP 1995 Work Plan Eielson Air Force Ease

* EPA and state Performance Evaluation (PE) samples* field samples spiked with known amounts of analyze* split field samples that are analyzed by another laboratory* single-blind QC samples (concentrations unknown to analysts)* double-blind QC samples (identity and concentrations unknown to analysts)

3.10.1.4 Internal Performance Audits

The LQAC is responsible for conducting all internal performance audits. Audits are conductedat appropriate intervals for each operational and support group but at a minimum on an annualbasis. The results of performance audits are summarized and maintained by the LQAC anddistributed to the supervisors who must investigate and respond to any results that are outsidethe control limits.

3.10.1.5 External Performance Audits

EA Laboratories regularly participates in external performance audits as part of its laboratorycertification efforts. PE samples from the EPA water supply and water pollution studies areanalyzed twice yearly for the state certification programs requiring participation. In addition,PE samples are analyzed annually for other states and agencies that supply their own samples.

The results of external performance audits are summarized and maintained by the laboratoryQA staff and distributed to the Laboratory Managers who must investigate and respond to anyresults that are outside the control limits.

3.11 LABORATORY PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE

Within EA, preventive maintenance is an organized program of actions (such as equipmentcleaning, lubricating, reconditioning, adjustment. and/or testing) taken to maintain properinstrument and equipment performance and to prevent instruments and equipment from failingduring use. An adequate preventive maintenance program increases reliability of ameasurement system. The preventive maintenance program considers the following:

* The instruments, equipment, and parts thereof that are subject to wear,deterioration, or other change in operational characteristics without periodicmaintenance.

* The spare parts that should be available to minimize downtime.* The frequency that maintenance is required.

The implementation of a preventative maintenance program is dependent upon the specificinstruments and equipment used.

56


Within EA Laboratories, the managers are responsible for preparation and documentation ofthe preventative maintenance program. The supervisors implement the program, and the QAmanager reviews implementation to verify compliance.

For each operational group, the preventive maintenance program includes the following, as aminimum:

* A list of the instruments and equipment that are included in the program.* The frequency of maintenance considering manufacturer's recommendations

and/or previous experience with the equipment.* A file for each instrument in the program containing a list of spare parts, external

service contracts (if applicable), items to be checked and/or serviced duringmaintenance, and directions for performing maintenance (if external service is notprovided or if not stated in manufacturer's instrument manuals).

The preventative maintenance activities performed by EA Laboratories are given in Table 3-IC0. Laboratory preventive maintenance is conducted by qualified laboratory personnel oroutside vendors and documented in instrument logbooks. Date of service, person performingservice, type of service performed, reason for service, and replacement pants are recorded.Copies of service records from outside vendors are maintained by the laboratory supervisorwith the instrument file.

3.12 PROCEDURES TO ASSESS DATA PRECISION, ACCURACY, AND

COMPLETENESS

3.12.1 Formulas

The formulas used to calculate accuracy, precision and completeness are given in Table 3-I1.


Laboratory control limits are calculated using the formulas in Table 3-9.

3.12.3 Documentation and Review of QA/QC Activities

Laboratory Quality Control is evaluated in the narrative section of each laboratory report whichcontains observations made during sample analysis. summarizes the results of quality controlmeasurements, and addresses the impact on data usability based upon project Data QualityObjectives. For each fractional analysis the narrative includes:

* Sample chronology: This section summarizes the sample history by fractionincluding the sample preparation method and date, analytical method, and analysis

57

SWMP 1995 Work Plan Fielson Air Force Base

date. Anything unusual about the samples, digestates, or extracts is identified.Holding time compliance is evaluated in this section.

0 Laboratory method performance: All quality control criteria for methodperformance must be met for all target analytes for data to be reported. Thesecriteria generally apply to instrument tune, calibration, method blanks, andLaboratory Control Samples (LCS). In some instances where method criteria fail,useable data can be obtained and are reported with client approval. The narrativewill then include a thorough discussion of the impact on data quality.

* Sample performance: Quality control field samples are analyzed to determine anymeasurement bias due to the sample matrix based on evaluation of matrix spikes(MS), matrix spike duplicates (MSD), and laboratory duplicates (D). Ifacceptance criteria are not met, matrix interferences are confirmed either byreanalysis or by inspection of the LCS results to verify that laboratory methodperformance is in control. Data are reported with appropriate qualifiers ordiscussion.

3.13 CORRECTIVE ACTION

Field corrective action procedures including procedures for repeating or stopping work arediscussed in Section I of this SAP. Corrective action is necessitated by the failure of a givenquality control measure to produce results that are within prescribed acceptance limits.Corrective action may also be necessary as a result of internal or external audits, performanceevaluation samples, s plit samples, or other regulatory review

Table 3-8 presents the quality control criteria and the specific corrective action to be taken foreach type of quality control measure. A summary of laboratory corrective action procedures isalso included.

The field supervisor, project QA officer, laboratory managers and supervisors, and laboratoryQA manager are responsible for assessing the QC measures and initiating and/or approvingcorrective actions. If previously reported data are affected by the situation requiring correctionor if the corrective action will impact the project budget or schedule, the project manager andthe client project officer are directly involved.

The Nonconformance Report and Laboratory Nonconformance Record are used to notifyproject and/or laboratory personnel of the problem and the corrective action and to documentthe implementation and approval of the corrective action.

Any corrective action recommended by the AFCEE as a result of system or performanceaudits, splits samples, or data validation review will be documented and implemented.

58

SWMP 1995 Work Plan Elelson Air Force Base

3.14 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORTS

3.14.1 Reporting Procedure

Internal QA audit reports will be prepared by the CQAO, submitted to the DOM and includedin project reports. If no project audits are performed and no significant QA/QC problemsoccur for a specific project, a letter stating this fact will be submitted in lieu of a QA report.

3.14.2 Report Content

These reports will include the following:

* summary of field QC data* summary of laboratory QC data and assessment of data quality objectives

(precision, accuracy, and method detection limits)* results of any system or performance audits* significant QA problems and their resolution* progress/outcome of any corrective action.

59


4.0 FIELD SAMPLING PLAN

This Field Sampling Plan (FSP) contains the requirements and procedures for the collection ofgroundwater samples for sitewide monitoring at Eielson Air Force Base. The purpose of theFSP is to provide enough written detail so an experienced field team unfamiliar with the projectwould be able to collect high quality groundwater samples at the required sites. This FSP isformatted to be consistent with the AFCEE Handbook (AFCEE 1993) and with previousEAFB field sampling plans.

4.1 FIELD OPERATIONS

The sampling of all monitoring wells at the base under the sitewide program is scheduled tobegin in August 1995. Table 2-1 details the wells to be sampled.

EA will conduct the field program from the EA Fairbanks office on Van Horn Road atInternational Way. The office is fully equipped with communication and document productionIsystems and is attached to a warehousing space suitable for storing equipment required for the

project.

EA will maintain a trailer on the base, equipped with copies of relevant project documents andplans, field supplies and tools, safety equipment, and potable water.

Groundwater sampling will be the primary task performed under this year's sitewide program.Notes chronicling daily field activities will be kept in a bound field notebook. Samplingprocedures are described in the following section.

4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING

4.2.1 Well Sampling Procedures

Specific procedures for sampling of monitoring/supply wells are discussed below.

4.2.1.1 Well inspection

The outer protective monument, well casing, and the well cap/seal will be inspected for anysigns of damage or tampering. If there is evidence of damage or tampering, or if a lock ismissing, this will be recorded in the Groundwater Purge and Sample (GPS) form described inSection 4.5 and/or in the bound field log book. This form will be used at each well to recordinformation described below.

60

SWMIP 1995 Work Plan Ejelson Air Force Base

4.2.1.2 Determination of Water Level/Liquid Thickness

The well cap or expandable seal will be removed and wells will be gauged to measure waterdepth and any apparent thickness of product. Measurements will be read to the nearest 0.01feet with an electric sounder such as an ORS Interface Probe or equivalent. Water depth,product depth and measuring point description (top of casing, if possible) will be recorded onthe sample purge forms. Water level indicator probes will be decontaminated before and aftermeasuring each monitoring well by rinsing with dleionized or distilled water.

4.2.1.3 Well Purging and Sampling

The samples will be collected by first purging the wells. Purging will be accomplished using alow-flow purging method with a submersible pump or by purging three to five well volumes ofstanding water using a clean bailer, or peristaltic pump, or submersible pump. Dedicatedpumps will be used where they are present in three former supply wells at 0U6. Ski Hill.Parameters of pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and temperature will be measured in thepurged water using hand-held field instruments. Samples will be collected after the measuredparameters have stabilized. The field crew will record the values of the parameters forinclusion in the report. In wells where the only COCs are petroleum hydrocarbons, the intakeof the purging and sampling equipment will be located approximately I foot below the staticwater level. In wells where the COCs are chlorinated hydrocarbons, the intake of the purgingand sampling equipment will be located approximately in the middle of the screened interval ofthe well that is below the static water level.

Low-flow procedures may be used for purging wells. Low flow purging is recommended bythe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA 1995) because of the loss of volatiles thatmay occur during conventional hig-h-rate purging of three casing volumes of groundwater(Barcelona 1994, Puls and Paul 1995). Low-flow purging also minimizes the production ofpurge water that must be stored and treated before disposal. Low-flow purging and samplingis normally executed with dedicated sampling pumps inside the well. If the low flowprocedure yields good purging results as indicated by stabilization of groundwater parameters,the low flow purging will be considered to be an effective method of obtaining samples that arerepresentative of the aquifer.

Low flow purging procedures will consist of purging a well with either a 2-inch submersiblepump or an inertial pump connected to dedicated polyethylene tubing at a rate ofapproximately I liter per minute (I l/m)(Barcelona, et al. 1994). During purging, dissolvedoxygen and specific conductivity will be measured at approximately three minute intervals.When the indicator parameters have stabilized (within +/- 0.2 mg-OC: and +/- IO us/cm), theVOC containers will then be filled using a flow rate between 0.1I and 0.3 I/min.

61I


Wells that contain free phase product may not be purged or sampled because of the nuisance ofhandling the product in the purge water and the increased potential for contamination ofsampling equipment. Wells that have been damaged by frost heaving or surface impacts willbe inspected to estimate the possibility of contamination from the surface. A decision will bemade in the field after contacting the project manager as to whether to sample damaged wellsor wells containing product. Wells with product may be sampled without purging dependingon the site-specific sampling objectives.

If the low flow sampling method is used, samples will be collected using a low flowsubmersible pump with virgin polyethylene discharge tubing replaced between wells or a footvalve (inertial pump) with dedicated polyethylene tubing. Samples will be poured directlyfrom the tubing into clean sample containers.

lIfthe traditional three well-volume purging and sampling procedure is used, groundwaterrepresentative of the surrounding aquifer will be considered to have been obtained when pHand conductivity have stabilized to within 10 percent on three consecutive measurements andthree well volumes have been removed. Samples will then be collected using a submersiblepump, a foot valve with dedicated tubing, a clean Teflon bailer, or a plastic disposable bailer.suspended on unused nylon line or clean monofilament line. At a minimum, the traditionalmethod of purging and sampling will be used to sample the three deep nested wells at ST-48and the three former water supply wells at 0U6.

If a well goes dry during purging, the well will be allowed to recharge before collecting thesample.

4.2.2 Sample Handling

Field samples will be labeled, recorded on a chain-of-custody, packaged. iced and, shipped byovernight courier to EA Analytical Laboratories in Sparks, Maryland. Samples may be storedin a designated refrigerator at 40 C in the Fairbanks office until final packing for shipment.Individual sample bottles will be wrapped in bubble wrap or placed in foam packs, sealed inziploc plastic bags, and immediately placed in coolers until shipment. Coolers will containdouble wrapped bag-s of ice to ensu re that samples reach the laboratory near 40 C.Immediately after coolers are delivered to the air courier company, field personnel will notifythe analytical laboratory to expect cooler arrival. The samples will be analyzed for selectedconstituents specified on the accompanying chain-of-custody. The types of sample containers,minimum volumes, preservations, holding times, and method of analyses are described inTable 3-3 of the QAPP.

Each sample will be assigned a unique identification number, using the following generalformat:

62


(source area number) (station type) (station number) (sample depth, if applicable)

For example, the coding ST2OMWOI represents a sample collected at well MWOI at SiteST20. Samples will also be labeled with the date and time sampled. The labeling system isdesigned to be compatible with the Basewide Environmental Analysis Restoration (BEAR)geographical information system used at Eielson AFB.

4.2.3 Sample Custody

Sample numbers will be recorded on the chain-of-custody (COC) along with the time thesample was collected. The COC will be sealed in a clear plastic bag and attached to the insidelid of the cooler. Coolers will be sealed securely with a duct or clear tape, and COC seals willbe attached to the lid. Chain-of-custody forms will be signed and filled out for each cooler.The samples for duplicate analysis will be selected by the field crew and indicated on thechain-of-custody. Copies of the COC record and the shipping air bill will be maintained by thefield manager and faxed to the project manager or designee for review. The air bill numberwill also be recorded on the COC. The COCs will be kept as part of the permanent samplingrecord.

4.2.4 Quality Control Samples

Quality control (QC) samples will be collected and analyzed. The following defines theminimum QC sample requirements. The field crew will have the authority to collect additionalsamples if deemed important for quality control:

* One duplicate will be collected for approximately every 10 samples.* One trip blank will be sent with every shipment for volatile compound analyses.* One field equipment blank will be collected for every 10 samples.

4.2.5 Sample Analysis Summary

Table 4-1 summarizes the types and approximate numbers of each sample type to be collected.

4.3 FIELD MEASUREMENTS

4.3.1 Parameters

The parameters to be measured during purging include pH, temperature, specific conductance(us/cm) and dissolved oxygen using field instruments.

63


4.3.2 Equipment Calibration

Calibration will be checked on all field equipment at the beginning of each day of useaccording to the manufacturer's instructions. Calibration data will be recorded in the boundfield log book.

4.3.3 Equipment Maintenance

All field equipment will be stored or maintained in proper working condition at either theFairbanks office or the site trailer.

4.3.4 Decontamination

The exterior surfaces of the non-dedicated equipment contacting groundwater will bedecontaminated after sampling each well. Reusable sampling equipment will bedecontaminated between wells by scrubbing with an Alconox detergent solution, then rinsingwith tap water and then distilled or deionized water. Decontamination procedure for the Redi-FloTNI pump Will consist of removing the dedicated discharge tubing, except for a 10-footleader, inserting the pump into a clean drum filled with base-supplied water, and pumping aminimum of 5 gallons through the pump body. New polyethylene discharge tubing will be thenbe attached before inserting the pump into the next well.

Purge and decontamination water will be contained in drums or poly bottles by the field crewsand may be disposed of by the base Hazmat facility staff.

4.4 FIELD QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM

4.4.1 Control Parameters

The only parameters to be controlled in the field are those collected during well purging. See

Table 4-2 for a list of the field parameters.


The control limits for field parameters must be met prior to collection of a sample. The controllimits are given in Table 4-2.

4.4.3 Corrective Actions

If the control parameters do not stabilize within a reasonable amount of time, the pH-, dissolvedoxygen, temperature. or conductivity probes will be recalibrated. If, following recalibration,

64

SWMP 1 995 Work Plan Eielson Air Force Base

the field parameters are still not stable enough to collect a sample, the well shall continue to bepurged. If the field parameters are still not stable, the sample shall be collected and thiscondition recorded on the field form and in the bound field log book. The project managershall be notified and, depending on his or her judgernent, the well will be resampled anotherday or sample results will be reported with a qualifier.

4.5 RECORD KEEPING

Field personnel will maintain field notes in a bound log book documenting sampling dates andlocations as well as daily events, weather conditions, observations, field measurements, and anyother pertinent information relating to field activities. All data collected during the sampling ofwells will be entered on the GPS form, (Figure 3-1)

4.6 INVESTIGATIVE DERIVED WASTE

All investigative derived wastes will be coordinated through the Eielson AFB3 HAZMATfacility as instructed by the facility supervisor Randy Smith.

4.7 SITE MANAGEMENT

The HQ AFCEE Contractor's Representative and base point of contact are given below.

HQ AFCEE COR: Mr. Mike McGee, AFCEE/ERD, Brooks AEB, TXPhone: (210) 536-5392

Eielson AFB3 POC: Mr. Mike Raabe, 354 CES/CEV, Eielson AFB, AKPhone: (907) 377-1164

Eielson AFI3 SGMP Coordinator: Mr. Steve McNeil, 354 CES/CEV, Eielson A-FB, AKPhone: (907) 377-3835

Eielson Air Force Base responsibilities will include those outlined in the Base SupportAgreement dated 20 November 1993 and provided in Appendix B.

65


5.0 REFERENCES

Barcelona, M.J, HA. Wehrmann, arid M.D. Valjen. 1994. Reproducible Well-Purging andVOC Stabilization. Groundwater, 32 No. 1: 12-22

Engineering Science. 1994. Operable Unit 6 Remedial Investigation Report, Eielson AirForce Base, Alaska. Prepared for HQ AFCEE/ES Environmental Services Directorate byEngineering Science, Richland, Washington.

Harding Lawson Associates (HLA). 1989. Installation Restoration Program RemedialInvestigation/Feasibility Study, Stage 3. Draft Report for Eielson Air Force Base, Fairbanks,Alaska, Volume II, Draft Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (July 1988 to April 1989),Chapter IV. Prepared by HLA for the Alaska Air Command, Elmendoif Air Force Base,Alaska.

Harding Lawson Associates (HLA). 1990. Installation Restoration Program RemedialInvestigation/Feasibiliry Study, Stage 4. Draft Report for Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska,Volume III. Prepared by HLA for the Alaska Air Command, Elmendorf Air Force Base,Alaska.

Harding Lawson Associates (HLA). 199 1. Installation Restoration Program RemedialInvestigation/Feasibilit'v Studyv, Stage 4. Draft Report for Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska,Volume IV. Prepared by HLA for the Alaska Air Command, Elmendorf Air Force Base,Alaska.

IT Corporation (IT), 1995. Eielson 0U2 Environmental Monitoring 1994 Field ActivitiesReport, Prepared for AFCEE, Brooks AFB, TX. February.

Kearl, P.M., N.E. Korte, M. Stites, and J. Baker. 1994. Field Comparison of Micropurgingvs. Traditional Ground Water Sampling. Groundwater Monitoring Review. Vol. 14, No. 4,pp. 183-190

Puls, R.W. and C.J. Paul. 1995. Low-Flow Purging and Sampling of GroundwaterMonitoring Wells with Dedicated Systems. Groundwater Monitoring Review. Vol. 15, No.4, pp. 116-123

University of New Hampshire, 1995. Draft Final Report on Microwell Investigations ofUnderground Storagze Tanks and the Cargain Road Spill at Eielson AFB, AK, Prepered for theUSACOE Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRRZEL), January.

U.S. Air Force (USAF). 1992. Sampling and Anal ysis Results frr the North Boundary'Wells, Lie/son Air Force Base, Alaska. Prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory,Environmental Management Operations. Richland, Washington.

66


U.S. Air Force (USAF). I1993a. Automatic Water-Level Measurements, Eielson Air ForceBase, Alaska. Prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Environmental ManagementOperations, Richland, Washington.

U.S. Air Force (USAF). 1993b. Background Ground-Water Quality, Eielson Air Force Base,Alaska. Prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Environmental Management Operations,Richland, Washington.

U.S. Air Force (USAF). 1993c. Eielson Air Force Base Operable Unit 2 RemedialInvestigation/Feasibility Study: Remedial Investigation Report. Prepared by PacificNorthwest Laboratory for the U.S. Air Force, Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska.

U.S. Air Force (USAF). I1993d. Operable Units 3, 4, and 5 Draft Remedial InvestigationReport. Prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Environmental Management Operations,for the U.S. Air Force, Fielson Air Force Base, Alaska.

U.S. Air Force (USAF). 1993e. 1993 Site-Wide Ground-Waiter Monitoring Program DraftWork Plan, Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. Prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory,Environmental Management Operations, Richland, Washington.

U.S. Air Force (USAF). 1993f. Source Evaluation Report Phase!I Prepared by PacificNorthwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

U.S. Air Force (USAF). 1994a. Operable Unit I Remedial Investigation Report, Eielson AirForce Base, Alaska. Prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

U.S. Air Force (USAF). 1994b. Source Evaluation Report, Phase 2 Investigation, LimitedField Investigation. Prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland. Washington.

U.S. Air Force (USAF). I1994c. Surface Water and Sediment Investigation Draft Report,Eielson Air Force Base. Prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

U.S. Air Force (USAF). 1995. Site-Wide Ground-Water Monitoring Program 1994 Report.Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. Prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory, EnvironmentalManagement Operations, Richland, Washington. January.

U S. Air Force (USAF). 1995b. Sitewvide Remedial Investigation Draft Report, Eielson AirForce Base, Alaska. Prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Environmental ManagementOperations. Richland, Washington. February.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1991. Supplemental Guidance for SuperjitndRisk Assessments in Region 10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle, Washington.

67


U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1994a. U.S. EPA Contract LaboratoryProgram National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review. EPA 50OIR-94-O013.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1994b. U.S. EPA Contract LaboratoryProgram National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review. EPA 500[R-94-O012.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1995. Groundwater Sampling WorkshopSummary, Dallas, Texas. EPA Publication 600/R-94/205

68

FIGURES

H I~~~~~~~~~~~EIL~i~

r BLALR tro LAKES

FO FACILITY -h

Figue 1 .EilnAr oceBseLcain a

LI-P.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-

11\0~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~L600~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I

Z

C~~~~~~~~~~~I

la

C I I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I

. . . . . . ... .. . .

0 0 0 a la~~~~~~

oew w-*qv w) UOPAOG I*Ag-rA;SM~~~~~~~U

I~~LM

NORTH BC~~~flARY TZIZSCC

a 000 1000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~00

~rnu * s~iin51MB4 a3on

Figur 1-4 3 pags) EAEMapshowig loctionsof seectedsouc ra n

monito aringwlsi h dvlpdprio ftebs

(frm it WMd rudae oioigPorm19 eotBtel

PNL. January 1995)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

391m4~~~~~~~~~~~~

53UC2

0 ~~500 loco

L MEMM 2~~~~~~*S~pdlng Uzo.Uoa

Figure 1.4 (3 pages) EAFB Mlap showing locations of selected source areas andmonitoring wells in the developed portion of the base(from Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report. BattellePNL. January 1995)

01 ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~~0 sc1000

Figure 1-4 13 pages) EAFB Map showing locations of selected source areas andmonitoring wells in the developed portion of the base(from Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report. BattellePNL. January 1995)

04MLFO

IdrrERS - amlngLcatlon

Figure 1-5 EAFB Map showing locations of selected source areas and monitoring wells inthe "'upland" portion of the base(from Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Program 1994 Report. BattellePNL. Januarv 1995)

LEGEND4 Groudwater mctrfbring well - di n wA1ftLP has beut

M=Groundwater elevation (ft msfl July 1 994/Septwibec 1994

-Approx~inate exteeit of area to be refmediated - (afbia for ama to be rmnedatadbasad an 100 1&9I. disolvd bemmne concwasdon vAn hitrcal Wesmoe d NAPtJt v

Jutf S4 sm S4Juky94 Sep.14PUMPHOUS

TPM-WO (S-s.f0 cm4PC- WO ITPKOPO - A) TPHOF-UE0L4

/WW 2 5300)Sie, i c

<I 1$doa 90 174-.1 .20 6TdHOP f-L750 2 S40IW.0

20A410 -~~~~~~~nmn

J~~dy '94 Sam lu 20MO9 PPI~~~4GAO - 2~.C0 .5

Th'4.ORC- 30 20~~TH-OO-1-00 25

(54Q-W ~ ~ ~ ~ wo7= : .60 <50 M9.65) (W I~~~~~~~440O ApproximateMOD

Groundwater a 2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.00 4.00

Acorcx Scal (fet)

Figure 21. STZO efuelingLoofrE-7 Comple

E -6 ~~~~~~~~E LU2.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t

gL 00

0~~~~~~~~.~~0

.2~~~~~~~~~~9

- C -

co a oZ C

LLI ~ ofrE w~~~~~~~~~ V~~~;

0 ~~~~~ -, ~ ~ ~

goo

~~~~~

~~~~~~~c

C ~~~~~~~~CYIcs0

S O!

CLC.<

.0~~ a-~~L -Co 0 .

00 0Vs' or- *C

0.~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~

I -~~~~~I

0 0~~~~

-cL

v OCv

OM ledi

M0d0

,=m 223

a a-~'U It

Z v~~~~~~~~~~~- I

* 0

2 - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~CL

CD -0 1~~~~~~~~

0 am~~~~~~~ 3 0C 0 ac 00

a~~~~~ 0-CDI < at 0a

* I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I

~~ fli' ; --0 O -

0 -o ...So.

C C - wO C.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N -

* a I* c0 =~ a ;

CO .myi~'~~: JZ~~-

'S ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C UCL

CDC

IC Cn EŽ3Efn

Z. -6~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I

=cn~~~e

73~~~~~~~

14 Dec. G1un4semu"- <1 FoDctn

TPHRom- soTPI4-O - 4100

SEWAGETPFO- MPOND

TO

PASSENGER

/ HEUJPAD

CONTROLGeero14 4TOWER ~ I \/Btr. <

TPH4-GRO - so

VEHICLE TPH-OR - 200

MAINTENANCE soPsioSHOP Old FuelUna Ae¶

somi .TPH4-GRZ- S

(testaed) New ~I~e4 Une- pj BLAfDDERSOP. ~~' / APEA

SOMO4 aSOW 1O 72S

0 so~~~ca 24Dec.14s 66C Bnwe~~~~rS-A- S9

LEGEND

4- ® Gmoundwater monitoring wai - creindkwsm >001 7 ,AL as be~deteced in gauging pint aff(eas xce

+ Destroyed groundwater monitoring well

(KUa) Groundwater elevation (ft msfl(NS Not sampled - free Phase Product 0 100 200

e Approxmmate wentl of area to be remediated - (aftra tor are to be1', mmrdjatd based an 100 44. aiisolved beormne corcrtrawnand Ap prox. Scale (feet)

histrical puseenc a NAPI4

Figure 2-6 SS50-52 Blair Lakes Facility

a * "a

C"C

C-

*/ \

I-* 47 (\�\7 a-4

4747

K.

4-. -�

k�s±M& i-a.'I

I- -

CL-LI C-

92..Th -

Z/ rjz -

oA '

- -* / I - LS.--

- K INri

5-

__' 1 f

2 MI MS -* ro. a /

_____________________ r.YIWI>

I

/

/ L

it �/V I*6 C

1 -a/ I

I-- / - -

isH I I-

/7 -l36' j"/7 tI � -I;

C 'C �"/7 ( '5 I-

S

CL -

�n i'

I;II *� I - a-0

-/ 0 7-, grmFl N

II4 II

itt I U

i�I ILi I

- * :- ii

.� SI: ¶1! r- a *:�III1'� I� I ill I I �'

I �A�i II

4'KV I

I C-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~L

I I, I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r

Ire.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1k-Ile 1 1 OW s~~~~~~~~~~~ourH~~~

all~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a

V~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0 .

/ U

-)I 'Pe~~~~~'4K)'

0 c~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~01

Oj - 0~~~~~I-

LU 05~* 0a: 0 LO)~~~~~~~~~~'

cr u~~~0.GP~S

a C~~~~~~~~~~~~N/> -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C

'I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a ~~~~ r>~~~~~- a - -~~~~~0

*~~~~~~~~~~~:-~~~~~~~- ~

'I 5-.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~uo

C.~~~~~~~~

(AMOGASO'O

CABDMOCND)

I 34 09

3386 ,2Z5.800GAI I [ff~~~OICSZL TAWES S8-

I U 3405

0AaON.3 ACbnofled Sold Wes

SCA.. S-.v We

Figure 2-10 STiS Oil Boiler Fuel Spill(from Elelson OUZ Environmental Mjonitoring 1994 Field Activities

Report, IT 1995)

/~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~J

:~~~~~~~~~M ~ ~ ~

T.. A. I ~ - ,.

,SMWO6~~~~~~~QWOI01ECIICUOF

I' / i7>~~~~~~~~~~RUOW~q ;O

G(04,110.11ar mwaurl4

Well~~~~~~N

Ab400Ga*ae eMors

24 ~ Znamam Cncw'9 o

a ISM O7 DDoCtfl O

Figure-11 S19J-P4Fueline -pAreGCUOah .O

(from ielso OU2 nviromenta Moioig19&FedAtvte

ReportITf199r

(0

U)~~~~~~~~LU~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~F

C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

C N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

- n -

16-

r40Mc COL~~~~~~~~~~~~

0 'p = a-Z 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ =

o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

S C -~Ui

WO U, h.U C

U ~ C '0 0 N

-g 3 u 0 ._ 0 CC.r

C<k' C c. 00I C- 'tCQU ~a a C,

Zr- N Fn t in

-� -

- C - kjo L. 0

-� ... '..jU b0 -J -.

- -- -d

C *� C C. N. - C Ia �-

�tS� To � �iC

�JzS________________________ -

U

-I- o (N

I -

/ C/ � I.

07/,

0)0� . I- (A,

o

.- 0)

N C

�; 7�4tt"'. 6./ .�UA$j$v:.-.�' CC../�K4K�tt' W ' � 0":tp5$ri�'W, o j

'�:.$5$. 4 c,1 - Ca

0)N fit

C22 =

C �-0)

rn

NV2�- -

* III 0�

ri6.

-

SI.

,- -

-,-- U0- ZE- c

ID~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~ ~~~I

a -- [--- -- --

i/i IIL. - iiI�u Z�'o-

f, I--- �ijt--- - - - � w- - --

-- 00N Es; �N e� I

-% -'

01 CC

I-

2

C Co _______ C.rr �.-' -

- N.C

- --S.-Ic 'S

9% - -- -L

U2 I I' :... I -

- I-

- 6...

K-. -

- '�CN I -

I '� CtNI _ -In_____ I- Cl

4% A-ie a en,.--

C, U,

ri

6U

:1:�

I -c

V :�

rz.uj .c

£ ~~LAIMS iDEA

303 / SS39

39MC5 ~ ~ ~ ~~~~910

I ~~APPROMMATE16.4 G ROUNDWATER

M 9104 3FLOW DIRECTION

Coo 1~~~~~~~~~~~r 60.29'Wae al

Veil 1oca~~~~~nj urv~~~wt -' ____Wei

Water table

- ~~~elevation

Water Table Meva~~~~~~~~~~/Watr tbl

(frm O3,,5 emdia Inesigaio Reor (RviedDats Fma

PNL)~~~~~~~

031d3U3/

03M 1 6MW21

09MO2ateia

03M 15~~~~~~~~~~~~Pteta

z>4e!,%, ~~~~~~~~~~~ me~~~~~mcL

D2isosa a<LO3EO

Fiur7-17 LF3F0UncieBs anfl!Fr riigAe(fo U,. emda netgtinRpr Rvse rf ia)

PNL)~~~~~~~~ikGondae

It I -

I2 -� -. 4 -

- C -

- - - - - 4

kr - .3�..-. 4�o �e,-. - - IrQ/ :� n- -- - .'s� -

/ :� ".A � - - U-- ' -- r@ S-: �: ±.�A -� -

OC -

o

ao - CS 3 �- I

aLw

C

V. -

Lw-Cr C

-

- I

_______ 2 a- - -a

,-, -

- 4. " -�- - - a /

- H- -. / -

- 2

- '-4 (24. -. '- - -�

- - 'S '-sI

--�

I Iii0

@4%

'S

'-4 .�. f

-, - C�JI -

.4-

- r. N

>-r.Cr. -

V. - -

- K

: aIMRlUS

/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C

//~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1

K ,/// r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-

=(A=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

6J~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

00~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1

go

mi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.

* 'C.-p=&t*14khm AFS C-AMDep~Pu

a~~~~~DtoVblft S= iwt

'A~~p=TfE-e d7ru

ct LandfiH Ideritfied~~~Efiito~nm

'L1~ ~ ~ ~ ~~0

'I ~ ~ ~ 01G

" tiIS9O m

I'~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~MSRPae WSmi

'I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E hae2GwwtrSmi

I' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H..woo e

U~ ~ ~~~~~~3CmsadMoeMnaigWlI'o1020rees AHASneWae n eietSmigLaa

(fromSourc Evalatio Repot Phase 2 Investiatariaon.Brell-

A Pit 4

DOnU LabdsA W l 4~palitW d o

Pit 3 KAZWAT 9K Pit

Pit2~~~~

(twy) Pin~~~~~~~~~~~~TO0 i

Pft 1~~~~~~~~~~Pi

A Ss we 2.

- ~~~~~~Onrw Wins Ama

Ac~~~~~~~~~a ~~~~I 7

Figure 2-21 LFOI1Original Base Landfilland Drum StorngeArea showing removaland cleanup detail (from Source Evaluation Report. Phase 2Investigation, Battelle-PNL)

PND

GRAVEL- RO3AD

SHLA MONITORING WELL1

C ICC 2C0 ACCSCAMS IN

Figure 2'22 LFO5 Old Army Landfill location(from SER Phase I Final Report, Battelle-PNL)

i~~~~~~5~~~~~i

a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r S -cC0

-- CL

C3

= C

oirc~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~c

At>-

CU

Liz7

C)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~< <~~~~~~~~I

* - <

N~~~~~~U

LO~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a

ON

-A8go LU~~~

I LI

Hr- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

= ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Z E- Vfr~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~nni ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t

-: >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Jr .

&ARMISON SLOUCH

COMMISSARY __ ____

3310 4~~~~~.7~ 7S 4 07~

0.~~~~

a -~~~~0OS l 4SG

4759092447S01

- .~~~~-64704 .7 rOrwrCH-~~~~~~ z

-N7hAL AVENLIE

UNICN - ARKtNG L-OT

S HLA MCNrtORING 'NE..

e HL) ECRINGW

o SOIL GAS 75 *c 2CC

0 GRCUNCWA-h, RO8 SCALZ N-

Figure 2-26 SS47 Commissary Parking Lot Fuel Spill sample locations(from SER Phase I Final Report, Battelle-PNL 1993)

.N-

Figure 2-27DPSS Birch Lake ReraWnAe oation(frm oure vauatonReort Pase2 nvstiaton Ba Refuse~t

U'C ~~z

co -

U~~~~~~~

cwLICn *.

U a~~~~0 mrwz~. - OS-oI

z

o~~~~~~~~~~oie~~~~~~~~~d~e

0 wzizw

co

2 -~~~~~~~~~L

U')~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C.

L~~~~~ CN L)~~~~~~~~hi C

< LO -i~~~~~~~< t.U2 m LL.1

LJ z < Z LLLJVL1C j0

+EAFB-1 307-tdW5 EF-.o

1506~~~~~~J51C

EXCAVAflON AREA

4F~ ~~~- CNtCMwc ~j Figure 2-29 UiST at Building 1307

7~E3ThIJATE CRCUNOWAT;,

FOWI0RECrGN

C RECCMMENOED ACOIThCNALMOMN TORINO 'ALL

GARRSON SLOUG

0~~~* A' CE L4AJ~~~~~~~MNT.SHOP

0~~~~~ S 9 ~~~~~~~~~02350

4 DEC0

U SOIL BOREHOLEASO

PZ~~~~~e P!EOMETER ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OMRON

FORE-STED AREA NT

(DASHED WHERE INFERRED

=

CI. UrIDat

0C >2

�. IID

'0

ir I

�� I

.�e. -,2tJ

.t .,

a

U II -

C C- � 'aC L.Q 0 5

C SC a z

1.2C>

-C � *II - -

0 0

- - Cz .�- 3 6

- CZ I---------------------------------------------------.- .C

a 5I - -d -Cz - a -C C- N S :

0I > �I--------------------------------------------------- - C

- I-

--C -a

-0

2 A

C-:

I-

a

Sz

6 ZI, 5

0 C

2 a

-i - a -4

-( -

-4Li> ___ _______________ ______

�1 -t a.

DISPOSABLE FLEXIBLE PCLYETHYLENE TUJBING

MONITORING WELL

GROUND SUJRFACE

SLIP CONNECTION BETWEENDISPOSABLE AND DEDICATED TUBING '2-4' WELL CASINO

1/2" POLYETHYENE TUBING (DEDICATED) 4 IPV EDCT)

STATIC #A TER LEVEL - ---- ---- ----

1/4" WATER INLETS

INERTIIAL PUMP (DEDICATED)PVCA(NCENT

I.WATER IS PUMPED AT A RATE OF APPROX- 1 LITER/MINBY MOVING THE POLYETHYLENE TUBING UP AND DOWNWITH A PERIODIC MOTION CF 2-5' AMPLITUDE.

2. WATER INLETS ARE 1 FT. BELOW STATI WATER LEVEL ANDARE APPROXIMATELY 1 FT. ABOVE THE PVC CAP

3, WELL MUST BE SCREENED IN AREA OF WATER ~NLETS FORLOW-PTLCW NOT TO SCALEa ~~EA ENGINEERING,

SCIENCE. ANDFigure 4-1 Low-flow purge and sample withTECNLG

inertial pump, Eielson AFBI Alaska K MIKE WC-TRICH 2 L-LC

TABLES

Table 1-1 Average Metals Concentrations in Background Groundwater Samples

I ~~~~Conlcentrltion (is4-)[Metal j Jun-92 Jun-93 i93 SpW

Auminum NA 142 129 7538Arsenic 8.9 8 7 9.7 25

Barium 107 107 ias 269Calidum 49000 47813 49750 58525Chromium <20 <5.42 <5.42 20Capper <20 <2.65 <2.65 75Iron 2374 24201 2218 16938Lead '5 c1 <0.6 21Magnesium 10588 10006 9938 17375Manganese 1457 1545 1604 3875Nickel C30 <17.9 <17.9 31Potassium 3175 3125 3213 5650Sodium 14619 3675 384 8383Vanadium '30; <3.841 '3.84 24Zinc I<101 <3.441 <3.441 63DISSOLVED _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Aluminum NA <32.5 <32.5! 43Arsenic NA 6.91 8.81 8.3Barium 100 1001 106! l1llCalcium 48494 475631 496881[ 517501Chromium <20 <5.42t <5.421 <1.01Copper <20 <2.851 <2.651 2.41Iron 1694 17901 18251 17361Lead NA <if <0.61 <1.01Magnesium 10319 998Sf 98691 10450Manganese 1409 1542 15771 17891Nickel <Z30 <17.91 <17-91 2.31Potassiuim 31751 28291 31501 34001Sodium 44381 36191 38381 45631,Vanadium <301 <3.841 <3.8'41 < 101Zinc <101 <3.441 <3.44 St5

Table 1-2. Sitewide Water Levels

MINIMUM LIST Additional wells if possible

Wells DTW DTP Well *DTW DTP

I-I ~~~8.90 03M08 frozen at 7.55

2-I 9 65 03M06 13.71

2-2 9 44 03MI6 9 81

3-10 7 36 6-6 8 28

6-5 7.14 10-4 7.11

9-2 $.10 10-6 10 2

11-7 lid stuck in July, can substitute lI -I 18-2 10.98

13-I 11.05 20M21 7.32 7.33

13-3 10 36 44MG4 7.73

14-3 6 27 53M01 6.12

16-2 9 60 60M01 10.58

17-2 9 14 60M04 It(36

19-4 7 34 IOMW II 4 26

20-2 8.17 lI-1 10 26

20-6 7,39 46-I 6 83

20-24 5.43

25-3 4 52

25-5 broken. trv 10MW-IlI instead

26-5 10 2$

26- 1 9 88

32-2 9 55

32-C 11 42

35-6 9.65

35-7 8 64

37-1 1052

39-4 II 12

-44-I II 34 Note proper well nannes were not used

44-9 forzen at 3 74 ~~~~~~~~~~~i . 35-7 is really 35.M07

45-4 9 28

416-2 heaved. ti- 46-I instead Data collected by T77 Cole and Linda Kuoley 09- 10 MaY 1995

48 3 15 65

49-i 8 41

53-2 12 48

884

5-1-5 880o

6(3-3 ~~~0 72

00

(U - - C~~~~~~~~~~0E-

o6 'S '5' ZsL) 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4

02W 4,-~~~~0 0 -OC

~~ E~~~ 00 g4, 0:0 E

Co

<0ooogqoo _

4, 00 0-N w G o

c ~ ~ c

0C

0)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ,0 (Ii

LU-I -~~ LI)>a

cc)L--~0C00- i-~-

w 0-0-0-0- 0 - 0 0 0 - i 0-0-0-0- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0-0-0- ~~~~E

cc- 2 00 0 0 0 0 0 0dUdO~lid~i 0

C <_ __

z MO a a0 -i

C~~~~~~~~0 .C 0= a in>>u a, 0

0 0 3- =-. c02

5

E >0> 2Fo_>?SE > C=- "CŽC E-, C3 C5i -- cO

>- inS>00 0C 0C >* 0 Ca6

< COCC

0 CC CC C 0 CC 00 0 0 0C0 oCC C 0V I~~~~ ~~ ~~ C~~ ~~ m micCW ~~~~ 04C 0 NCC 04(50 c'C 0451- CC. o4Z~ , OrYCr OcY c 0 0 0NO 0NCO -aNCD

C < ro<< ~~~c< ~<< ~~<< ~ << W,,<< c<<a. ~~<<~

C n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~LC.) Lii & C~~~~~~~~~~~~~

0J - CCC

m ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~

ui CC -

i I C C6

'M 0 ~ ~ ~ - 400

.a

0 0<

0 <(

0 -a - C~~~~~~~~~~~~

0)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~U

-0 0~00 E o

C) - c-..

_ C _ - 0

(30 ~~~I06zw oom p co ,omoa 0 0a Ma

0~~~~~~~~

-C) CA

m E co~~~~~

00-00 00 0 000 -

0 0<2 ~~~~~~~~~ U)0 ~ ~ ~ ~~~EU

C - ~~~~~~~~~C.0) C = 0)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

0 C

m)a:< U 0

IC

2 0~~~H

C 0 0 00MM c0 O Ma

00 o 0 B00"c

&, 0S ; NCD0 >CO0

0 B~~~~00 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

U 0~~~~~~ 0-. 0 c c 0-

ui m~0 EoM M M z

cU)

00 a

x0 0 0 00

C~~~~~~E 0 0.o E~~~

* a~~~ a

n

E

C�* -

� Fl �2�.�

L-.coini �

U

C n OCQ4fl-�

-4-

- - - - - - - -

C-a

2�2S

L & (NW-- C

- C --� 0��

-0'-- E-5

--

E �

- (Nzoa 1-

-

2-cn6 -o

0' C, _

CCVC

- -

C

-C

C *-c

-o 'S I

I� 0 t5N Cc ZW S0J-

mm0

2

Ca

n

**~~0000000000000000000000, 00000000000 0a0 00 000

>1 .0.00 .0.0 ..0000.000000000008o . 0200 00000000 000. 000. 0

a =

Ca -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

6 -~~~~~~~~~.....

S&~ o o o o o o o o o o o c o o o o o o o o cso 0000 0 0 00 0 c ~ 00 00

00000 Oco 0 0 0 000 000 0 0a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --------- --

- 0. 00~~~~ .

- - -22. ~~~~~~~~~~~- ----------- - -

-U'- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~.....

~~~~~ I-~~~~~~~~~~~ - 2 - - - - -- - - 2- - 2--2- -2

- dt2 oooocoocoooooO 5 v 4 . ,A~oooooooo2 5 Rooooo0 0 0 0 0 0 22 5ts

-~~~~~ C ~ ~

000 00 0 0 0o 0 00 0 0 0 000 ......

.9 . 5 . S.92 2 1,S 1 '.S 9 t 25iCnent 9 2l9nnn.n9nnr,".95'

OOOOOOO OO2o oo o 000C 2 2R 2O22OOOCOOCO 2 2-oooo2 ooco

~~ 0 0 0 C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00. 0

Cr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~00...... o... 0. .0

a 00 00 00 00 00. 0 00000...0 000 0 0 0 0

~~ 22~~S~S22.. 0: ..... ......550 -~o~ 50

a coocoocoococ~~~oc 000000 0 0

000 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0.O 0

oO4-- ~~~ ~I,un n nnnnnn:fnif nn

C -2 c - 0 0 S S 0 .z98

~~~.cu~~~ ~ . M 00C00000.0.9.0.00 9002 00000000000

ci.: 0*-~~~~i o O 0 OO c 0

E-: 2~ ~

- a- nnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnn-n-n-f-l- l - - -n-- -

- ,.~~~~~~~~~~~~~

- ~ o~n~o6666oo 00000 ooc666oo2 26

E 2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!

C .

'ah~S - ~ r~ 6 r

eno).-nwin

I-~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~ 4~~~~~~~~~~ - -~~~~~~~~~~~C

* COO~~~~~Otfl.O~~~~OO.-ac~~~tO..

~~ 1- 2 2.:af- jr t l ~ , N

IDI N- N'5~~~~ cn ci~ ~~Cr~ ~ ~~~~~

fO

N ~~~I- 2 22 22nnnn2~~~~U

c., ID 'fNOcfl-DLIOoncO C'- ~a CN *

0-0 0' m

- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~CD0)

C cq I~~~~~~~

0)C 0)

- a,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-U

>. (n0oo0.)0SR000c o00 (mEEv0r

4 ) C)

N 0) WVE~CNO

-c~~~~~~~~-

c -~~~~~~~c

Z Zn n

ON E Q OOCOOO6OOr C

Cj >1~~~~~~~~~~~~

-- Zn 02~~~~~~~~n I -Cd, C~~~~0

M Mr Ln rt

en C

CD03

- - 03 N L 0cM cq -T~~~~~

C30

ejen~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c

C) C- -~ ~ ~ Cl n I C3 O

accocc~~o cc 03

Iz~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~IC30 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C

C3~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0

C5 V~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C

V 0~~~~~~~~~~~~0

H

o v0 C 0'n'n r-rn 'nun~~~~~~~~VV eflO~~~~~~~~~ Vv~~

Con, v c V~~~~~~~~~~~~~U

0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ en 6~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~VV ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~tLF-

L ~ -- 'nO Nt~- 00 0 ~'n- ~ 'n -en

o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x

VO 0104 en ~~. tr~~: 6~ cd~~ V Cfl~fl O'cfl V V1

U ~ ~ ~ ~ tI 11 ,I 4" tI tI 1I i1 ' 41 4I

0 CC C 8VV

C-5

V~~~~~ de

0V V N V C C

C VO - !fl 6 V V u~~~~~~~~~~r, CIQ%~~u

LL:~~~~~~~~~~~~n

N 14~~~~sr N-

£ SnV--. Sn~~~~Z ---Z Sn -- 4 C6tVV 6 VVV 6 VV Cl~~~~~~n CCCv v -C~~~~1 1

CCC CC ~~CO 0 0 O go00

C~~~

V V VV Vv CV

' ~ ~ z C A a vv

co CI'00 C VV C v C 5vV C v v

C -=~~~~~~~~

C~~~~~~~~~-

-C +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~E

~) ~ ' -C - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - -

C C ac� C

o N-

- '0

HC

a 0 cca oa3 cca C'0

en- vv

C.� N� � on a -- E

0',0 �flOO 4�

- � � riLA'� � a�. � 6 � rim v A4 )

N -v - ci

- ?�. 4C 4)t .4 .C

< � -4) -�

.4'.0 '� I,o a.�. C - r-'r ccc �. � .�

� o-� rW" mY �6 � � v�v a vv- �- V V C- �

- U-. LU _ C.

0' C4)a. C C 0,0 �aa 'c en" a- ci � � '-a- 6 --o � '.0c. � �c'� vvv vv

N c.., '.�O oN� - V- HCr - -,

Ct 1)* .4- C � en ci

- 4) � en C �,0 . C.Cr - �.venvmv �a'.0t-enc'� -� V vvv

4) en

-t

H=C

z �2'tO �4 -t r-ci�m -hr

- - - -. 4C- -, ,0C' c2 5 mnenmn en en rnencn mm .4-C hr N-t *�.4

'-4--CC .�

-� I C

- 4) -)

CC. 'C

-4

- - 'tiren h 0'3, C moo C'hr C- C.- = ciCCr I- . . . . .

I .4 - - 3,3,N

C

2-4- 4,- - .t-t

-'In Inn In LflIn4)

4) .4.4 >�..A C..4 >'2. .44 >,4 � C-ti >,Z C...j 4) �1 44- .4 .4- -, � 4t4Ž COC�'Cr .44)- -- C A

ci--� 3,0 .4enen.cIE -en� � - � *'t--N3 � t�

- r-r-r-r-t-�-- ,03,3,,0�3, 00000ci c-i c-I c-I ci

.4� 2:

cicic-loicici C'lciciN ci c-i c-ic-ICIciOICI ctcitIc-ic-l 2:

aa Ca Ca ao V Ccci -� a= -- C- v�- 2

a.a

CCQ C CC CC CC cc CC'Cv, Cv,V VY vv - vVa.

F-

� c''9 --� v 6 a vv a -v v v civ �

=

Suz '� - 'C c -- --ov a vv vv

C VLL2

ci- N V

6 a �;V - CH

- 0)C- C) "' c�'C= ', �-- - U,VV C yy -- ci Ccl N�V c'iVV � -,t VVV

"C

- C"C

Ca. � C',? !tX C' CU,- - 0000 .rC' CC' N C'?- � 0000 C'00 C'00 - CC'Z CflCfl mm '1'

'CU, U,'C H� 02- z"C-. 0�

- -. U

z- C);� 00.="CQ � U, mci 't-a 00,? 2'

'C- c.�* C) 00 N00 Cr- 00

'a.

"C- '� 00 00 00 (1 00 00 '? !?= C CC 0-N CC �0 000000 CC 'CC CC CC 'CV-t 'tT .rU¶

'Cv,C)

-, �CC � 2NO� � � C'C'

C. 3:- -� � C) C) C):,� � � C):, � C) -6 � �nZ�-�c � cn

KOCrL *3:, 0 -

r- vA00 0 - cZAoCR 0-� '0-'�-c. 2g�cic� -rr�j-c. m�i-co (N0 4 -

CJO4CIC'ICI �fl0*'.rflCfl fl 't-t LOU, 'CCC4 c-Jr-Oct r'lr'Ic'Jc'lci ciclr'oroc-j olciriroci c'aci ricic',

-C�-CIOIC'I 00 000000 0100O10000 ('400010404 ('400 (Nc-tOO

-Vo o U U U

W 0'- N - - 0'O .2V(N AV VVV V2V

'0o 00 0

0 00 '0' '0 0 0o vd, 0' - V 000' (�0(N C.

�000 00 00 00

r3 '.fl 00- (N VV

C-- C

cc 00

C-- U- o�rw, t--�. �VIn -- -- 00 In� CA� VVV c.�V VVV VV VV VV C 00

- -. U 0'rlC - - CV -�U -- V --

0z .o � 00C,, '� � mnu�� -- C InrrO -- -- 00 w�CVVV VVA VVV VV VV VVUN

V00

- U- .4--,- -C

F- W C,r.InIn -C v�Inv� -- In� -- 004 rr,

- � VVV VVA VVV VV VV VV Cl 00�

V- Fcc unu-,v, --- C U�W�In r.u� (N COO �t(N

VVV VV. VVV VV VV VVV .0C Cfl0 -C Z'0''C 6A

- N VC

- -o

-Cz0

,. � - �cq-t xrn rt >z � - �0�0' N� �fl%-C hnru-C nr� cr - -,

- =

-

'*0' in 04z -- -0 -- t 'aC-' I 00'- = -�-2

- 0�0 --- 0- 0-C -J

Ca. �. a

- 0-r -to Ir.(NCl 0 - NC Inc Olin

- -0 C'0� -0'

- C- 0 -- � -J

- -'> I) - �- (N

-- -N -- 04- InIInV, CC 0�'n C'0' 0'' 'C

C C- -' In" U,.,, tflin a Cl �'1 = 0 'a

0-�

U � 0 U C-AZ 00 C->�L >1'� 0�lC)ofu � C) C) C)U=� C) 0010.1 � C-) U a 0� 0 *�

o �-,G�'o 2 C�'� 0 CC�'��'c o cc�Z�N ZZ�6, 5 C r-

- rnrrrn"� .��CCl-t 0'r4�t

'--.0 00 �-V��UIn C'CCCC IC I)

-t-t-t vr

o C co 00 co coo gooI I I- C1 ~ I 0 Ccci

v v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~t~

00 0000 00a mnv~~~~~

~V V V V V V-c C~~~~~~r~~~ V

vvcv v rCV~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Z

~~~~~~~

-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Cl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;7

~--- --- --- --- ou-1 -- CC r-i or-

- -- '.0 ooc'j~ ~ ~ ~~~rnv 1 0

o S

C '"?, 0vC q6 CR v Niv

C '0C C , C

o 0 IVtv C

o V V --v 0V

C~~~~~~~~~Cz Hq- n nf C.r ' u ~ ~ -

o , 6 C~.. ~ r .

0.)

r-� 'C ON 0N-rflU enH

0 en

H

o a 0 NONo en 'Cr-en

0�

z Ho --a - 6� VY

V VeIN03

ON

'0 '.0 VtN --

F- 60 cr3 6�t VVC en Va

:3 43ccF-

U. 0�flcc 0N - CINVt -�

- V -�c'� V..:V VO

0 V�0-

VtC' - >VtN�t Z.

rn.� V s�r-Vp.-. - 000- V�.043 43

Cz.0030C0�: .�

- 0 S' ONO' �.... en mm

�Vt VtVt -H &9

HC0 Z

Z ON

5 �C�Z13 � C-�0�

0 - 43en r- 'or- B- C .4 Vtc-i -� C

- -. 0

C� -� 0

1< N -�

F- 6VtVt VtVt -O

:3

4343

'4�0

� ONON��? C=

0 'j 43 43 � 0 43

=

- 'C'C'CC VtVtVtVt- - o00� -- ccc

C'ONONON enmINetmINmnt- r t It Vt Lit Vt Lit

6 W N~~~~~~O- 0~ v

C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v

0- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V

0 ~ ~ ~ ~ '

C.C

z~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c

C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C

U)~~~~~~~~~(

a0~~~~~~~~~~~~~a

Cten '5 r C'

* - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~W- CD0.

6 0 0~~~ 0'EcL o ~~~~0 0 rca)0

- :0:~~~~~~~~r D

U,0 I- no~~~~~~0r_ Co

IC? l ~'n- D~)

* < < << < <C C < <<C <* *- zZ Zzr r Z zr Z Z

< << C ' <CCC'-z z z z -Z~ Zr Z

I- ~' - C w zN zr z

C.... >' oh z- -zrz z z rr z

- - - ~ ~ z z z

6~~~~~~~~~~

:0% ~ ~ ~ z zzzzz

r~~~~~~~~~

V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

-~~~ ->' - C C - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z

m I0�

C - � 2: z -

CCU

-I. -S � '-Ia- - -t -t

eI..

- '1'- '4 0' *¶ 0 0 -

- 0'o - � 7 ,-;

o - U ------------ � -1)

- 0.- - 0a 0. C-. x 0' Li Li < C

_ 0'?Ifl C Inr'I

� -

- - 0 0 -I 0'I 0' od 7. �

I- � C -�'�'3- 0 -z-CI >' -

- .C 0' t'I 0 Q < 0C - 0' t 7 -w -w

Ct- '4 W - '. '. -� U- '4r� U,- - - 0.- .- -

c' 0 0 0-- C - It� 7 � Z * CC

'..J 4) 0'a'0 - 0

- - I-. 0' -, 0 0 a0% t 7 , 0 .0- - - 0

- C)

4"' - 0

CcJ o' In 00 N

� 0' 2: 2: cii IC

MC-

-,

* 3" Z

-

N-*7' U 4) U � 0'

____ .0'_______-------------. 70w o.Z.

3 ~ ~ ~ZZ0

;zn-fn n

0~~- t~ox c o t o t o i

N C

-- fl N 0 NN N N N N N

Z o co 0

-- (N~~ -r-~~ ~ U,

C~~~~~ -------------- C ~ ~ o 0 0

C m Z mZ

1c

C

cCC ~ C ~ Ci c

Ln Lo LOV~~~~~C

C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~S

C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~cC~~~~~~~~~~~~

-C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c

0~~~~:

cue~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c

-- C~~~~~~~~~~0C

X ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~

C

U~~

.0 ci ~ ~

a~~~~~~~~~~~L

S ~~~CO

CC~~~~~~~.

- C~~~~~~~~~~~ZC

di 0 0c3 C

C2

: r- co6 -~ ~ ~~1

* 6

Ut )

~~ 3-r~~~ i

E~~~~~~~~~~

0 vZ v v v.. z-

~z z z z 2 z z

* V2 V 2 V 2222z

-VVV Z V V 0-'" 6

0 0 io < <

00 - 0002 2ZZ zC- vNvV V0

0 2 vZ * In vI- * V V

CO 4~~~~

'C~~~~~~~~~~O

>.0 0 ..0 N 0 ,

N -

0, 0, N ~ v N ''E

- 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

N L i~~~~~~~~~~>00 - >.~3o O lo o;oI

CC-------------------------------------------

- .i ziiiE z zz z *"r r zz

* - I C C a C

3 ernrnCCrnrn .¶ 1u ~ :Cr a uI ~Z~rZJ~r zzZZa z

C5 C C CIl CC CI cCC 1C VC usC

* "*9~~~~~~ g ~~~~~e cio cc CC C

OC C* C ec e 0 z:. z

- - - - - - - - - - --- -

0 _____~0 2 ZC~~~~l

6 r v - a

4)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,

-t~~~~~~~t

>~~4J Cl Cl Cl 00 CIaN~~~~~~~~~o

6 Z

cq ~ V a v

Table 2-23 LFOI Original Base Landfill and Drum Storage Area Groundwater AnalyticalResults (from Source Evaluation Report, Phase 2 hnvestigation, Batteile-PNL)

LMI &am VWso" aflmp -M"

plwmnnn $a. in 11- - Guatm

ML7M pot. MS LI MO IMO uaat FOO

7= 1VL ~i la -J II~. fl Mx)4

M U O:

___ I ~~~~L 34 ND 1 0 3 71 MI Dckm~ MLiCA NO D 0366 M %A GAZ -uUzhai~ wat M: N XD NDM&M W OUMOI

M& 0,4 M IND 2U S

-~ 114- ML ND am '

ND NDIND

A~~ 4010.06 W. LA j NO ~~~~~~~~~~54A MA)40

'-4 4~~~~~~~M m I mu

Ian wI.. IA J~~~~~~~~N ?lj MS 'M D i Ci0 0)

MA- 30 7fl 590 lazaa 4 9401alO MORA.S MA- 4 Li '~ 17 U~ , 146It 3101

tin~a WI. LA 10 M = g 313,01

M'3 ND No~ 31 ND 31auQka~ Om ~ t 144a U' 6100a sic0 s1UmNciCn ouc

L~ 3 MS 5 =I MCC A465U 31MIC...a~~~ar~mj ~~t6 =.i min ,M 24-191 0Ij40MC~~=; ~ Wt 6 Is- CS nA U; ' - 1)4C

Mit 3 MA m = -- I01)40!aM&4 M ZIN I=-d l-woaa 3114(c

'544 M CQ 304 3IWOA&~~ 30 M xO IM . ~~~~D M0 -1ML=

I )~ MAO .' ,,, lo Si100 SClOQW MA)01

M& LI am gm Q~4 :* I~ 01401

'Wt at ua =M o ' 0.- "~M I

AUL 12 ?71 II I'm 141W .1IVn mmaz~~. WI~~". r. I=4 n OO 'MM 'Ma 3S"Ii 0W

W C la I= Sla MD I 'Z.- OW.

Alt. u1g6 =q (IC7 : in 1167-54 3IMO:nit 50 j nA~~ ~~ flh~ l14~ 10.ft3 3U4CI

V No VDtS.- A

* S

.2=

'--4- .-

N0.-

- z�1 _____

ri0'

U,

*1cC '0-- flu I�Cr-z- - g � -l�c U �T Wi

In

� .� 4"

A4- 'C

9�a-Cl- H - -. -

0'

�, -

=0 UI-C

-c ,.�

U i.N�0 s Nil- l-�

o0�

--- j -I-RS

r4 --

0S S -

*.0

C Z

*L 0

an,: x : * )

SE

to I 0 f Xn r X XXX )rn V n to V nC ~ ~

C. - -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(

C~~~~~~~~~~

6 N~~~~! - 6 - 3

L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~L

CL

60 E

0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4: X X : *~~~~~~~~~~~0

I-------------------------~~~~>C~~~~~~~~

7 m U2 0 m a1lb~~~0w w I XXX xx 2u, 0cnw ( (

- I -~0 -L

J = =- - --- - aa ~ ~ z z

* s 4 4 4 4~~~~~O 4 ON 4 4 4 4

- U.~~~~~

a * * 0 C '. a m0 0- . - w a 6 6 0 0 00~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

C: a U 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0

0 4. fl 4 0 '0 , 4

0 0 0 0 N 4 . - 47: a 0 0 0 0 0~~~0 0 0 0 0 0

U 0 - C a V I

-4 C, C '0 a 2 2 CO I U CN 0m U z 0 *I ........ ... ........................... do1L I . - 0

C

oo3 coal0I, If _D ,L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C

rA >15r a~~~~

~~d o~~ '=Q 0 *r -o

CNS

N ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~C

E 2

'5 0~~ ~~~~~~~~w NCE

- 0)~~~~M0 02a00 NC Q C

cn z z z :2 2 IzC~~~~~~~L0

1 0 Oh..~~~~~~~~~~~~C *CD a * a02a r

aO 0 0 00~~~~~~~~~~ O nCD0

IC, la, IC c C re 00U) r4. 4 IND 4. 4' v

N" .. -60 C

eN~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~e aU'-S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

a- -~~8

5 <~~0

a- ~ ~ ~ ~

S 0 ~LJ

S ~~z

I-~~~~7 CY0

S~~~~~~~~~~~~~d ~~~ ~ C

< 4.. j0000 0 00 a1~

- ~~o'-,C,S cn~~~~3 Or0

a-Cd~~~~~~~~~~

0�

- 0-C,, -

LL.O � C.C C

C 2� 0 0 5Cu C (flO - - -

C zC '30 4) euC� o

V 2 C�2 S 00Cu cu = U 2 U U

Cj� > 0 � Cu

Cu C)>.Cu 1)2C Ca

0. .� 0�-, .� '�0

C C)eII CE

IN Cu 20ci' '4

I) ii Ii p 'p 'p 'p

Ct -�Q 0000xxCr +

xx 0 0- - C C- 0 HQ LI x

-4 S0

- 0 V x< 2 H I I H- '- II HZ 2:x

dO-�

- f-i 60X (N �fl

- 60I z

+

1< -xII

- Ccr�7..'

20) -

I-C 00-

zC) &

Cu C a '� �-,t* C C C C � A VC� C CuI.. Cut

Cu C)I. I- C)* .� C

C- to U-. �>70� C�)

a�2

V - -, U

9C) C )�4 Zto -� -) -

72Ž-' f-I

Eielson AFB SAP

Section 3 0Table 3-2Revision: 0Date: July 28. 1995Page I of 5

TABLE 3-2 QUALITY CONTROL CRITERIA FOR PRECISION & ACCURACY FOR SURROGATES,LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLES (LCS), MATRIX SPIKES (MS), AND MATRIXSPIKE DUPLICATES (MSD)

Spike Concentration Accuracy (%R) precision (a)QC Samiple Spiking_____________ I Cornpounds Waternug(L) Water Water

ADEC 8O15-M TI'! as Gasoline _______ ______

Sammoiae Spike BFB 50 50-150 _________

LCS. MSIMSD Gaisoline 500 72-126 <20

ADEC 8100-M 7TH as Diesl ____________________

Surrogate Spike Ortho-terphenyl 20 50-150

LCS. MSIMSD Diesel 500 38-116 I <35

SW5030O8010 Porgeabl halocarbona

Surrocate Spike Bromnofluorobenzene 50 70-130

LCS, MS/MSD Carbosnetr-achlonde 50 69-129 <25

____________________ Chloroform 50 85-Ill <25

____________________ I -D hicloroetharte 50 61C-129 <25

____________________ 2-Dichloroetharie 50 '9-1[17 <25

cis- I2Dichlorochene 50 '8-1 17 <25

_____________________ rarit- 2-Dichlorisethene 50 78-117 <25

____________________ Mebhsiene chlonde 1 5 '0-110 <25

____________________ Tetrachloroetherne 50 82-;06 <25

1 -TrichIoroethane ~0 7'- [29 <25

I 1 2-Tnchloroethane 50 69-124 <25

_________________ Trichloroethene 50 81-113 <25

____________________ Vinyl Chlonde 50 62-143 <21

SW503OmO020 Purgeable Aromatics

Surr oewe Spike BFB 100 69- 126 _________

LCS MS/MSD Benzene 100 51-155 <20

____________________ I4-Dtchlorobenzene Too 71-112 <30

Eth,,lbcnzene 100 71-1133 <30

_____ _____ _____ ____ Toluene ICC 78-126 <30

IXvlene%.total 300 59-137 1 <30

S5WX150 HerbIcidesi by GC/ECD

a) Precisi on r main, spkes, is lised oarrelatie %difference i %RPD). for Labsorator, Conirol Sample, the value s he prcso alc alated is[he moving ranige r.ijcs LCS recovenes

(1,Laboratory Control [Lirmit- t.C1 are based on histoncal performance and updated anocaily(C) Recovery cmetea is the samne as the ics only 'he spike concentrations vatd) [CS is commercial], p~repard reterence standrd, therefore concentrations vvI 1r

I -96 20 30() Stew ide SAP

Ejelson AFB SAP

Section 3 0Table 3-2Revision: 0Date, July 28, 1995Page 2 of 5


ISpike Concentgration Accuracy MR) Precison (aQC Samrple Spiking

________________ ~~~~Compounds Water(ug/L) Water Water

Surrogate Spike DCAA 2 0 50-130 ________

LCS. MS/MSD 2.4- D 2 0 19-113 <40

_________________ 2.4 5- TP 2 0 38-129 <40

SwR2SO Volatge Organic Compound _ ____ ______

Surrogate Spike Dibromoftuoromerhane 50 86-118

4-Bromoflurobenzene (BPW() 50 86-115 ________

______ ______ ______ Toluene-d8 50 88-110

LCS MS/MSD Benzene 50 83-119 <I

__________ _________ Toluene 50 86-119

Chlorobenzene 50 83-122' <13

lI-Dlchloroelhene 50~~~~~i 84-il? 1

_____________________ Tnchioroethene 50 84- 17 <I

SWS27 SemtivolatIe annic

Surrogtate Spike Nmtobenzene :15 100 35-114 __________

____________________ 2-Fluorobivirenvl 00n 43-116

_______ _______ ______ Terphenvl-dI4 100 33-I-I -

_______ ______ ______ 2-Fuorophenol 200 21- M(0-

____________________ Phenol-di 200 10-94

_____ _____ _____ ____ 2.4 6-Thbromoohenol 200 10-123 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

LCS, MS/M4SD Phenol 200 21-lI17 <IS1

___________________ 2-Chloroihenol 200 23-119 <I5

____________________ IA-Dichlorobenzene 100 24-92 <15

_____________________ N-Namroo-di-n-prolvlantnre 100 41-100 <I5

2 4-Tnchlorobenzene 100 39-9% <Iq

4-Chloro-1-methvlnhenol z0oo-9 <15

___________________ Acenphthene 100 46-I IS <IS

4-Nitroohenol 200 1-S <15

2 4-Dtiniotoluene 100 24-0h I <V,

Precivion ) mft infu Nptke, it-tied for relative %. difference- 1 %RRD . for Ltabor~ior Control Surples the ii u is the precision oakc ii id ithe momtug rarte for 'c- LCS recoveries

iS Laboramor Control Limits I LCS1 are bised on husuonct.i performance: and updated -unuallsIC Reo,,, riteriAi the sae s the Ics. only the spike cortcenritations al

J)LCS t, commercially prepared reference tandrdd thererore. concertruuons wil1ar

12796 1330 00 Suie'lide SAP

Eielson AFB SAPSection 3 0Table 3-2Revision: 0Date: July 28. 1995Page 3 of 5


Spike Concentiratin Acucy(R Precision (a)QC Samnple Spiking

_______________ ~~~~~Compounds W2IeT(ugWL) Water Water

____________________ Pentachlarophenol 200 9-103 <15

Pvrene 100 26-127 <15

nodilonnen ch vestcklm msad PM._______

Surrogate Smike DCB 0 2 30-150

TCX 02 30-150

LCS. MS/MSD gammna-BHC (Lindane) 0 2 32-127 <20

_____________________ Heptachlor 0 2 34-Ill <20

________________ _ A dmno 0 2 - 42-122 <20

_______ _______ ____ _ Dwiedoni 0 5 36-146 <20

Endrnn 05 30-147 <20

4,4-DDT 0 5 26-160 <20

SWEO!O Metals by Inductively coupled plasma atomic emirzion S~zocp ________ _______

M[SIS D JAnumonv 500 (CI <20

__________ _________ Barium 2000 tcC <20

Be-liMP 50 tc) <20

______ ______ ______ CAdmium 50 c) - <20

______ ______ ______ Chromium 200 cC) - <21)

__________ _________ Cobalit 500 (C) <20

Copper 150 (C) <20

______ _____ _____ _____ Iron 0o0 (c) <20

Mmnganese 500 (I<20

______ _____ _____ _____ Nickel 500 Ic0

Silver so (C) <20

Tin c)<2

Vanadium 500 (C) <20

_______ _______ ____ _ Zinc 500 (C)< 0

LCS ib) Antmonv' 2000 7 5-1i2 5<I

,R~u 40 9'-t04 I

I) Precision for na spike,, is lited for relative % difrneI'TRPD) or, Laboraor Conirol Samoles the vau i e prc ciL.dclaedjsthe cr05 rg ranto cco1r .uccessive LCS recoveres

Ib Labraiorv C,,mrcl Lmtmir C LCSI are bacd onhsoiOpcrforoxce ad updated annuallyIC) Recovery crmena i the varte as the Ccs. oniy the spte tofcenraitonts varid) LCS is commerc.a~ly prepared reterence' sandard hrcoe cocetrtions vvil san

2791,6 20 3000 5ites~ide SAP

Eielson AFB SAP

Section 3.0Table 3-2Revision: 0Date July 28, 1995Page 4 of 5

TABLE 3-2 QUALITY CONTROL CRITERIA FOR PRECISION & ACCURACY FOR SURROGATES,LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLES (LCS), MATRIX SPIKES (MS), AND MATRIXSPIKE DUPLICATES (MISD)

Spike Concentradon Acuav%) PrcZ o aQC Sample Spiking

________________ ~~~Compounds Water~ugfL) Watter Water

_________ ________ Beryllium 100 88-lID <[5

__________________ Cadmium 1000 90-101 <15

Calcium 10000 91-107 <15

__________________ Chronarmum 400 92-103 <I5

Cobalt 1000 90-106 <15

Copper 500 94-105 <15

_________________ Ion 2000 96-105 <15

MAaenesium 10000 88-114 <IS

Manganese I1000 91-108 <I5

Nickel 1000 92-106 <15

____________________ Potassium MO0W '5- 125 <15

_________________ Silver [000 81-101 <15

______ ______ ______ Sodiumi 1000 38-110 <15

Tin 88-109 <[5

Vanadiumn 1000 88-101 C IS

Zinc 1000 89-1 03 <I5

5W7060 ARSENIC by Graphiue Furnatce Atomic Absorpton Sp rometrv

LCs. MS/mSDO Aerteic 1 25 76-120 <IS

Sw'7421 Led bv Gra thie Furnace Atomic Absorpton Spectirometry

-LCS. MS/MSD ILead 25 75-117 <26

£300.0 Common Anionts by [on Chromatography

LCS. MS/MSD Fluonide 5000 92-Ill <I5

Nitrate 5000 90-I10 <I5

S'W7196 ilnavaicrt Chromium by Manual ColorimnefryI N e~~~~Choolm 90-i: I

I Prec io n for 'rins spikes iv lIs~ted for rel ative % di fference % ,R P D Ifor Lbora~tory ControlI Samples h e 'atuei he precis,,,in Ia laled a,the mo' tng rance for succesive LCS recoveries

(b) Labor-ators Control Lirnus (LCS) are based on hisoncal performrance and updated annuiallyC) Recose c ,-v rien, is he same as the Ic,. only the spike corcentrationts va

(dl LCS is commenrcial Is preparrid reference standard. zheretove concentrations will ir

12796 20 3001) Sitewide SAP

Eielson AFB SAP

Section 3.0Table 3-3Revision 0Date October 26, 1995Page 1 of I

TABLE 3-3 REQUIRED CONTAINERS, PRESERVATION TECHNIQUE, ANDHOLDING TIMES FOR AQUEOUS SAMPLES*a

VolumeRequired Recommended

Parameter (mnL) Container"~ Preservative Holding Timne("i

Metals

Chromium (VI) 200 P. G Cool. 4 C 24 hours

Mercury 250 P. G H-N0 3 to pH <2 `d 28 days

Other Metals, Total 100 P, G HNO, to pH <2 6 months"',

Inorganics, Nonmetallic

Fluoride 300 P None required 28 days

Nitrate 100 P. O Cool. 4 C 48 hours

Organics

Pesticides/PCBs 2,000 G. teflon- Cool, 4 C 7days untilmied cap pH 5-9 extraction

40 days afterextraction

Volatile organics s0 G. teflon- Cool. 4 C Id dayslined septum HC I to pH- <2"'

Sernivolatile extractables" 2.000 G. teflon- Cool. 4 C" '7days untilIlined cap extraction

40 days afterextraction

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as 80 G. teflon- Cool, 4 C"I I" daysGasoline lined septum HCI to pH <2

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as lOGO0 G. teflon- Cool, 4 C 7 days untilD Iee lined cap extraction

40 days atr

El-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~extraction

(a) From time of sample collection (40 CFR Part 136 3)(b) Polyethylene (P) or glass (G) For metals, polyethylene with apolvpropylene cap (no liner)is preferred(c) Where shipping regulations prevent the use of the proper preservation technique or the holding time is exceeded.

such as the case of a 24-hour composite. the final reported data for these samples should indicate the specificvarialnce

(d) Where HNO, cannot be used because of shipping restrictions, the sample may be initially preserved by icing andimmediately shipped to the laboratory Upon receipt in the laboratory. the sample must be acidified to a pH <2 withHN'O, (normally 3 mL 1:I HNO3/L is sufficient)

(e) Use 0 008% Na,S,03 in the presence of residual chionine(f) Samples receiving no pH adjustment must be analyzed within seven days of sampling

g) Includes phthalates. nitrosamines, organochlonnme pesticides. PCBs. nitroarormatics. isophorone polynuclear aromatichydrocarbons. haloethers. chloonnated hydrocarbons, and phenols

12'796 20 00 SlteWidt SAP

06~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0

o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~T

0~~~~~~~~~ -~~~~~~~

ci,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~

C,,

CUCC U

C

C

It

0� 'C

'I, C

C"

L.0 C>,r.

C C r 0 -,Cl

g

CC�CC 000- --

-� E CZCCCCCCCC

Zn

-r - -. - -A A A A A AA A A A A A

- - Q t) J .) J .J .J J J J JJ U - -

z - - -

U

z

- E zU - - A

U 7- - - - - -t� A -

--- 4-.---ZIZ u..2- ;�z 'C

- - �.Ž.aZzz&,r >N Z Z 6 cI

7

C -C�2 W rylo - - -

< <o Ca

eJen

CC � C & �S A - - en

-C > � C0 0.) CC= (N � 4 Ca

LLO C,., C -C U �

C Cr' C - 0 - Cen:� � � 0�

fl -, $ .�, Ca- n �' � 0

= -

, (N- C 2� .�

2 - r E 0.) *�4't C -�

U -

UC --4 A <

- -Cw >,

-o *' CC

o 0 0 - E

- 4C - C- ltvi, 50

- -z

-� - A

U 0�)

z 0- 5

-J - en

C" 2

U4 0.) 4 -�4 -o-t -it -C -C

-C

4 0.) -J< 0.)

C-

-3 C

C

A *4

-- C -'-C

4 2 5

000

C

0

004 en

Eielson AFB SAPSection 3.0Table 3-5Revision: 0Date: July 28. 1995Page I of 5

TABLE 3-5 EA LABORATORIES ANALYTICAL REPORTING LIMITS FOR WATER SAMPLES (a)

Parameter Units ReportingLimit

Herbicides GC/ECD - chlorinated compounds (SW846 8150)Dicaiba ug/L 2.7Dalapon ughi. 58MCPP' ug/L 1900MCPA ug/L 2500Dichloroprop ug/L 6.52,4-D ugh. 122.A5-TP ug/L 1.72,4.5-T ut/I. 2.0

2.4--DB ugh. 9.1Dinoseb ug/L 2.0

Inorganic nonmetalsigeneral organicsChromium. hexavaienc (SW846 7196) mgui. 0 01Fluionde (EPA 300.0) rng/L 0.10Niroogen.-niwaue (EPA 300.0) mg/I. 0.10

Metals - Cold Vapor (SW846 7470)

Mercurv ug/L 0.20

Metals - Furnace (SW846 3020fl000 series)

Andnaorv utiJL 6.0Asserlc uvYL 10 0Lead uc/L 30

metals - ICP' tSW8.46 30 10/6010)Barium uzJL SO0Bervtlium ugh; 50Caautmum uef/. 50Calcium ugh. 1000Chrormum uVJt 10.0Cobalt MLi SOCopper ug/I. 10 0[ron ut/iL IOUMlatresium uV't 10(0Mlanganese ue/IL 10Mlolybdenum upiL 5O0Nickel ug't 40 0Potassium ut'L 1000silver Ut/I 10 0Sodium ut/. 1000

Tin ue/i.1 .0Vanadium ugiL i 00

L.Zic ug/L 10 0

ax E.ALboaoe s established.Repo rrng Lmnizi tRJ-s) as laborauror quannitanon levels. These are the minimum

tancennmaonls to be reponed for routne laboratorv manases in clean cn',ironenuil nmamces wnh known presicison aind accuracy

The Rl; are denved from the MDL and the sensinivuv of the malnatcalJ technique.

Eielson AFB SAPSection 3.0Table 3-5Revision: 0Darte July 28, 1995Page 2 of 5

TABLE 3-5 EA LABORATORIES ANALYTICAL REPORTING LIM[ITS FOR WATER SAMPLES (a)

Pararreier Units ReportingLimit

Sermivob~tile organics CC/M[S . (SW846 3520/8270)Acenaphthene ug/L 10Acenaphthylene ug(L tOAndurre-ne ug/L 10Benzo[ajanrihracene uag/I. 10Benzo~b]fluoranthene uag/L. 10Bernzo(alpyrene uag/I. 10Berizo~ghilperyiene ug/L 10Benzoic Acid ug/L 25Benzvl alcohol uag/L. 10Bis2-chloroethyl) ether uag/L. 10BisC'-chloroethoxv)mnethane ug/L 10B3ist2-ethvlhexvl) phthaiate ug/L ICBis2:-chloroisopropyl) ether ug/L 10-L-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ag/iL 10Bur' lbenzvilphrhaiate uag/L 10-4--Chioroanilinc ug[L tO-4-Chloro-3-mneihvt phenol uag/I. 102-Chioronaphthalene ug/L 102-C'dorcohenol ug/L 10-I--Cblorophenvl phenyl ether uag/I. 10Chrvsene ug/L 10Di beazo(a.h jarnhracene utI. 10Dihenzofijrarn ug/L 10Di-n-hutvl plhthaiace ug'L 10I .2-DIChIorohenzene UQYL ICI 3-Dicnilorobernzene uv/L tO!..L-Dichilorobenzene Ug/L tO

.3-Dichlorobenndine ug./L IC2.-Z-Dichlorophenoi uag/I. to

Di~%Iphthalaie uci.L 102.4- Dimedhvlphenoi Iug'L 10Dimetlhvl phthalate ug/t 104.6-Din:cro-2-merhyl phenol ug'L 25

2% Di nirophenol tgIL 2524--iDi mrrotoluene ug/L 102.6- Dinrurotoluene uv/L 10Di-n-ocrl phthaiate ugiI. 10F uoran thene ug/L tOFlucrenie ug/. 10Hexachiorobenzenc ug/. I(Hex~:n crobuiadiene uag/I. 10Hetachlorocvciopentadiene u gI-L 10HcN xc nloroethane uviL I10Inuenof I .2-c.,djpvrene ugi' 10

oi iE L~aooratones t~a established Repormru Lmus (RLsi as labomuor' 4uantitzon levels. These are the minimumnconmoanons to be reooned for routine iaboncorv analyses in clean en' ironmentnJ mamrees wdh mnown presicison and ziccuicvThe RL- are denved From the M4DL and ihe sensitvity of the analytical technique.

Eielson AFB SAPSection 3.0Table 3-5Revision: 0Date: July 28. 1995Page 3 of 5



Isophorone ug/tL 102-Methvlnaphdialeme ug/L JO2-.Methylphenol ug/L 10,4-,Methylphenol ug/L 10Naphthalene ug/L 102-Nitroaniline ug/L 253-Nitroaniline ug/L 25

4-Nitroaniline ug/L 25Nitrobenzene ug/L 102-Nirrophenoil uWL 104-Nitrophenol oWL-;N-Nitrosodiphenvlamnne u wL I10

Pentachlorophenol ug'L 2Phenanthirene ug/L I10Phenol uzYL I OPvrene uvL I10

12.4-Tnch lorobenzene uL102.4.5~-Thchloronhenol u ZiL

24.6-Trichlorophenol ugiL I 0

Volatile organics GCIELCD - halogenated compounds (SW 846 5030/8010)Carboni ieumchionde uiJLChlorotorm uvWLI :-Dchloroedhae tacit

.'-Dichloroerhane ugiLl-Dichloroethene taci

Ms-. .>Dtchioroethene MwLirans-:-.>Dichlorcoethene tacit\IJerbvlrene chlonide oW/LTemachloroiethene ugiL

1.1. 1 -Tnchloroediane MwL1. 1.:-Tnchloroediane UPit

Tmnlnoroer~hene u P/LV'v:OV cnlonde uvwL

Vojatile organics GC`PID - aromatic compounids (SW846 5030/8020)Benzene tacit

Chlorooenzene uqwL1.2-Dichliorobenzene owLII3-Dicnlorobenzene tacitL-'-Dicnlorobenzene owL

ERh% benzene owLToiuene ow9Lx' enes. :otal MwL

'a E~ Lzn oraton es h as estab lished Reporting L~mitis (RLs) as l aboratcn uuanotaon levelIs These ire the inmumccment~uons to be reported For routine laboratory analvsesiIn clean en' ironmenul mamces 'vth k-nown presiceson and amccucT he RL, ae dered oem the MADL and the ~tensitvirvi of the analvocal :ecrnmque

Eielson AFB SAPSection 3.0Table 3-5Revision: 0Date: July 28, 1995Page 4 of 5



Volatile organics GCUMS -5 nIL purge (5W846 50301 8260) -Appendix I compounds (40 CFR 258)Acetone ug/L. 10Acrvlonirile ug/L 50Benzene uS/L 5Bromochloromethane uz/I. 5Bromnodichloromethanse ug/L 5Bromotorm ug/L 52-Butanone ust/il toCarbon disulfide ug/L 5Carbon tetrachloride uztL SChlorobenzene u1giL 5Chloroerhane ug/L 5Chloroform ugiL 5Dibromochloromeffiane ue/L. 51.2-D)rhromno-3-chloropropane ug/L 5I .2-Dibromoeffhane ugJL 5Dibromomethane ug/L 5:rans-i. 4-dichloro-2-burene ug/L 100Il-Dichioroethanie uzL 5i .- Dichloroedtane UWL1.1 -Dictrloroethene uLt/L 5cis-i '-Dichloroethene uvt

1rnsi2-Dc r ehlorooropa ne Ucis .-Dichloroopropne u2IL5

trails-i .-3-Dicriloropropene u2/LEhmilbenzene uviL52-Hexanorie L1Isobur' alcohol LIwL 100Methacrvlonirnle u PiL 100\4erh% bromide u PLMert' I ctilonde uowLMe'~ lene bromide owiLMeW' iene chionide uviLMern'r iodide owjL

i-e~-2 -peniarnone ugIL 10SINre're owJL

I .:._-Tetrachloroetharie Ut/I.1.1 L:.:-Terrachloroethane owJLTeormcflluroethene ogwLToluene owjL

1. 1 -T nchloroediarne uwl,1.1 .'-Tn7chloroethare UZ/1-Tri c niroethenie owL-T-m c ,I c r o flu oro me thare owL

in' EA __crarones has established Repounmi Lmnrs (RLs) as Iaboratcr quanottacon levels These~ the minmurniconcerwrunor, ro be reported for rounne laborator, analses it clean rn~ircnmenta1 mameies ,vrrh nmown presicison and accuracyThe RLU ar Jenyed from the MD)L and the senisiovirty of the maNalvcal technique.

Eielson AFB SAPSection 3.0Table 3-5Revision: 0Date: July 28, 1995Page 5 of 5

TABLE 3-5 EA LABORATORIES ANALYTICAL REPORTING LIMIITS FOR WATER SAMPLES (a)


I1.2.3-Trichloropropane ug/L 5Vinyl acetate ug/L 10Vinyl chloride ug/L 5Xylenes (total) ug/L

Total petroleum hydrocarbons CC (ADEC 8O15-M)TPH as gasoline (GC) ug/L 100

Total petroleum hydrocarbon GCCFl]) (ADEC 8100-M)TPH- as diesel (GC) ug/t. 500

a, ENi L~tboratones has established Reporrtnq Limis, (RL-) ais laboracoar, quonotnon levels. These are thenminimumtooncentruons to be reported for routine laboratorv analyses in clean envtrrnmental mames '%rh known presicison and accune'

The R, are denived from the.%IDL and the sensloivlty of the analyncal technique.

'I,

0

CA

0�0'

'I, - 43.z

Cl .z C U

� A 2c enC - -�oo�; . Cd' 0 .C � V -U

U 0) - 0Q U --U I I .� - I --

-� U U - 6.U'-Zn - z

-

-

- CC) U

- C -J

C)

z >0�

- -

- - VI

UU

- -z -- U -

- 4, - - -

- C) I 4, �- - . U

- C) -

- � -�

- - , 0-- -�S - - -z -- - tO -' - -

- J �1 Z- - U- o..

- I Zn -�-c

C-)

- KU

- z 2 -c -'

UC)

I C - U

-t - UC -- U - I

U

Eielson AFB SAPSection 3.0Table 3-7Revision: 0Date: July 28. 1995Page 1 of I

TABLE 3-7 SAMPLE CONCEN[TRATION FORMULAS

Application Formula Symbols

Linear rearession C = (ft - a,/,C = analytical concenrationcaiibration curves R = insorument response

a, = wrtercept of rearession curve (instrumentresponse when concenration is zero)

a, = slope of rearesslon curve (change in response perchange in concentration)

Caiibratoon factors! = A, Vf C = concennration (ugIL)CF V, CF = calibraton factor

A-, = peak size of target compound in sample extinctVr = final volume of extracted sample (ml-

V = imnaon volume of sample exuacted (rnL)

Response factors c C, A, V. C = concentration iuzL,RF A, V, RF = internal sitiandad response tactor

C, =ccnicencraoon of the nrternai standard (uv`LJ-k= area of the characteristic ion for the t-r~et

corn ocundV, = ftinal volume or i:Ntacred samole (mL

=area of the charactensuc ion for the internalstandard

V=initial volume ci sarrile extaicted iniL

I . Lsed ror quanotation by the external standard technique2.Used for quarrotation by the internal standard technique

i ?96% :o :coo Sicewide 541'

>3:(1

'4 C

n C.E

C Ca,C - A - - . o

U '1 0.Ct) - - U

U= U 60 - �cx�a C)%-. A� C 6-

S 0 -- .�

J uu C - - c �C =

00 � -- ± 4�U 2�2- C. cia ,� -, . - 8. �

�. 2 8. 'U12 >. - C

0. = - '4 a, -

6 - A* - 0u to

- NO C *Z U =

- 02- - 06 - 1� - = -- 21= U

- z -J c -� 4� C

C CU C C 4 U

- - �CU � 2" 0 �

U - - -�

U.j. �., '1 -

2 U = C a, �.± C.- 1) 5 0=

.0 C C = -�.2 -z c �C.2�== U

U�4U .00.0 '25 .2.

*� .�.; i-2C 5 Cu -- - *4=', - - >,

- 4 .0� 24 u � .Z�U � CUUS4U 0 0 = - - - It 4--- t�-� UZ 4:

- >zZ XUC 0oZ >5>>Z >a>u�z2 - � .tt

'.2 4-� U

5 >2 '4

21U

- I -

I 2.4

7

- - -s 4 N

2 -

.-±.� 2t

-7 r -

- .

-� 44-t

-C

'C

>2>4'-

-d

- -1I - -

'I 4

I -,

I .� U

U - 5 5 I - - - -- I - -

'C -

=

-'2;

.� ¾½ = :'

E- A 44 :4 -

:4 -CJ2 - - U =

- - .3 --.- Ct,- =

- VLL.C C>.,�. - - -

-J -C ' - � .3 - -

- 4.4 -.4 - V a- = .� :4 'I

U 14 -

-' 4 -- 0 tJ -- 44 z -� 4

14 - 0�- 4) -� A E- 44 -, 14

:414 a

- - - = 44- A -- o - a.' :4- �

- - - .- A r- - a -. 14

- 0 '4- I.

- '� -, -, 14 5 .4- 44 .-.. , 44 a 2

I-,00

--U

7.4" =-�-- .C A a

- A - - A A� � -, :4:4 .4"C -� 4 - "3 4 >,14 i-� -0 -:4fl-�

-� :4

-, 4140 0 :4-4:4

>1

.4

C -'7 4- -, �-4

:4

- :4

* -- C .4

- - -C

.4 -,

- :1- I- I - .4 .4-4

-. - -4-fl-1

- 0� :4

- - -I - -2' -- C2'zt -- J :4-14

- 14 .4 --

____ _________ 1-- I - - - - --

-C I- I -

I - -

- J *4 r- I -.4

1> .4 -4

f AM -

-5I � -c

-H-

= w -� -�-L

-C

- 01)r *� -�A - - 0

- 00� - 6. *4- - - - V & Ct�.0 -c = 0- '4-- >

.c2 (3 - - 6.C >,. � - = .c 90. r, j- �

.4' -- �'4 �.c =0-' - g = C �--� -J4) 0 - dl 144 C> CC no�.

C�0 2 CC C =fl

*4 4 ,-c, -� -dl± - *1 -'� �41 4 �-4 -U -U 4 '3 � j- '- t - c'- 4 A* 6 -

- - dl -± ; � 1) C- CA.�= �

- N U6 � u- - 13 C4

0. -

c dl0 -, 4 u �- c'4-0 tO-..' � �C.4 , =- .j - dl dl -�

� - C-�

z 0(3', -U A�- 4"

*44) dl-- �- 'o� �dl dl C- 4

13 *4 �0�=-C � .C-C.

4,.',

1A 4

C-nlr�r � - - -J -�

- - 6 .4- � 4

.4- N! A-A4

IC 'C

IC

- .4

'N - -

Z .� .AZ-Cl -

4 -J

-I:-C 13 44-4

4).� 4

13--

c-I 4

IC

- �0

444

IC

�1 -4 -

- "3' -4

-C

in -U

13

-C - -i

'91

- I Zn� -n __________.________________

- 0

CaS �- a

- a Ca

- 1) Ca - - U

Cd, :0 0 - -,

-� - 2 t�LLC - .4±3 -' 0 ii- - -,-- - .2 S a,

C tfl C - -- Ca

� ±3±3 S . '3-

- C --

�0 'U

*0 0- --J¶3 'a -S.

- -. �30� ±3 .3 --� -, 0 � .3 - -33 C-

6 -, Z

z �.-

- >. -; C - ICa- - - - ..,L. - .3% �j Au- - =3'.�� .,- 3 �1 .1� C �c.s- 1- 0 C-C- .± C=-c.�� -'a .� -

� -> C0

.� Ca'a 20

- - - 'a 2'a.zZ- a.. E A .3 -J �

- .4AA�- 330--

.4...±3� a� 1 -Ca - -S.

� - N -- ,a,.0 0-. � a:- '.3 C - CCa

'.3 - - � uCa -J Ca�3'

- -r1 �t'n Z < -cj-,-r - r'r1- -

* - CaCa Z Ca-) .- .5 -J

� �1 -- '.3

Ca

z

- = - Ca

I -,

- -, , -) -a- -

- S. -

.3 -.3- .3

-�: Ca

-, - - - - -; � -� .2-aC, -J Ca*2 .3

C - -i Ca

-C

-C

-C

j -

-S.; 3

.4 C 4

z

- IS. �oj-, a-- I

C

� 2. .4C' � 0a, 0 � CA 'U- = � A . =

S c � A - -� C.�j *4 .4

C > � � - -, - 0.� -�OC

<eroo **t- C. C 0 - - = Ia�0 � '� - . 0

.4 -Un �.C .4

-.Ctt�.4 -- - .4 - .4

*�= � x -4

n4- --0 .4

-� t� �2 .4C J...�'.0C .4 0 C.

�4 =� 0 � >,'U 0 -J.� *�.4 >.�-0.4,*u� >�A -

= .. fli> 4 .4A�'� 2 -�'C '- S�fl 0

' S� �UC-3C- - _ - >0 - CIa C- - 0 za"- 0 A0�o� .�0 -- �" -

- � 1 C�3

��*±�*d4 C�C. � Uo '*�4= --

-- AC -

- - �0�AoUd",�- - - � -� �&�'--�- C -, '-- - - C. C >0 -�

- - -s - - -, -.

Adto"z C" -;

-� � -- 4 -a�.4 -"4 OJjj a .� -j

- a - - -a - � >� �L'� ri .4 -� C

0�'� �C> - - ---C �E�-�i � -�,;b>"-� A�}.. �it.4 0 J .4.4 -0 0-4.: .40 >,

- �-0--c

-rJ e� c r- -o�r�. Z

-4

z-4

-C -4

- 4

- 0

- C7 -s .4-- - -, 0

- �o- -0�� j�

- A.,

-C- -� = - - - -� - - 4'N .4-, I - - -

I 0-A-,I A-tI - -- 4

- I 4

____________ _____ ___J -

C-

A

4 4.,>

o

I ________________ I ____

I4'

____ -jjt -c C,,

- t- 00) - - &

I, � -=

CA0. - = �- A.5 - 0) 'C- '3 - - o

2 �X Cd,Cd, '-' -, 001 0 > Y 0 CCNrTh - U -C - --, A = C 0)

C - 0 S ., -C - �0 - a =dCrr�o- -

0A . -, 0a - -�z� �0 d 0 0'0 '1 0 - (3

o e - o C V.- c S - 0) 0 0� - 0)0)t 2 o - -,'C E � -

- a � -Co

0) 0) -o - = - - CI.. C

0'3 A .3 0

I- - - -2.;- C C - C..� (3z C -� C

fl u S Z.- >&, = ..- � S a

0'� 0) C

- z � =)�' - - -S

- �.* = >-' C C -0)-

A a4 -0j� C.� - � 0.. a a.� -�0. -,

- U 0)003 �

Z - - A� -Ct) 0� g 0- A ti - - >-' --c - =: to � � r� oo

�c. �..'C A,.c IA �

- 'N N

-S

z-

'C

�0

�0

z .3.' 'C

*1 �

- A

.3 -z2 3- .3

-: 'C

3' 3'

-C *' -

.3 3

-' -z

:0

CA -

'C .3-

12

U-. C-C *� V L)

(.5 - 'C12 C U

(Nr' . u�C

<rtCC 4)�'� C C, � C,- - - Vr�

- .= C- Cs',

CL -� - cZ 'o e� 4),5� .5

C

C) -C12 Ct dr 12

C) '4) C�C 4)- C. 1) C C-5- c- - N -(.5Cr 4) .2 - C

Z C �

- 12=- CL - (.5t2 CIt

5- 5'

V � 4)"4) C)-

-� - � C 4)

C"Z 4) C-C5- - (.5 0-

4)4) 125,- a -

- .Th- £ - - - -U �;siYZ �

C 4). 4) C >., 4) - OCt C

-r4vut Z -- -5- 4)-

rN� '.2

t 'CL �.4

S - 4)',-

-C I 12-C

4)

- 4 ),,u-' I

4)4)

- .2' .4)Z 4)'C

- C t1 ..2

-C - C� (4

4) 0< - 4) .4C - - - + 4)1.5�� C, 00-

0,5CC 4)(IC (4 *�4)>.� 5.2 4)

- H 12 - .0 '.2- (.2 *.� -- 12 C ES

(2 - (2 - 04- Ct�Q

- - r U.0 -�-- >'-'-CCl-.

- CC',

- �'.J CS C

- -� �'C _ 4)- Cd C�

t .�- .Cs --

- (.5�.U - 25

Cr 0� �

� * -z

r- C

Ca

Mt. .4

Cr CL =- (C- C-

- .a 02

Cu -C

-s E &- C', =- � E k 6- C

0 '16 CCa.- -�g.C

00 .-

6--

- -�C- � I

C -

* -

>

-

o

-�

C-

CCC - 0

r. C. *� - U

C C U

C

00 C -

uU �

_ _ _ o C r 6 >� � �t -� -- V6 U *Z

C 5U ',*=

6sCt�� e -'

u-C>- 00 U Q j.� £CC�C-- -2

C - - -

6.;>' Li CtC 6-.6 *��- C

- U

V CV � a C 6>6-

.6 � C', � E oz -ZUz-' -

*� �6- -- - C

r .4 � V- - �C-U 6 - � 6

V -r 6

U - V

� �r v - --,

4�e� J 0 �

.c- 0000 - r --

- U -

"C Z,Th - U ?N

U

C

- U -

U

C- .4

J- -CU -J

at

'-V--

UU -=

to00-z =

-� -C- V U

-

.6'-

'C 5w,

acMU I- -0�U

=C -� t 6 al.-

Sw 6'C - U- 6-

-�C >,

6

'C C .,

,-� muC-0 --S

C C

____________ _________________ _______ �6.

-el U NU

enno

to toCV C

-' 'C- 'C',E.

4) U. 4)Ut U - 4)"

- C C - == - E j �erZ4) - C -= - �o C - C---cc - - - 0 U- -, -

O>�- -� = �., a . � U- - = = C r

C - C - - - -�C� -'u-- �r. C-' - 4) - - C. C '� C � . -C - - . 4, � C 4) �U 'C

4) Ca S -U 4) - � CU. CU v-a- 4)Cr I t4) .- 4) -, 4) (4 Z 4)4)

C V -J (4 � C -�C C CcJ -� sact.L� tOa .� T E 0

C "�!9

-� C4) tO >��C4)>�*- 4) a - u

-o

- r � =e�t - �O 2 z 0 . r�--, U. �-) �-Q '- -- �-'-t - C�= a = � c�C -

a - 4) � OO�� C 4 ) C0.C

a.. -- � C'-a - t = -

- C C J- -. �4)= 02uU. C

rC C�,-J U- . a-� -, U -- S

- C �>�- aaCaCa4) � '�4,4) C� -

- z a � -- - -- �� *= 4) Cu

C �=4) _ � -

=

- Z -N4�� -OJr.�rJr- t Ut -� r C

U'C

a - - a

a0

az C

-C C

- . - 4)

- -a

Z a 4)r4

4) C C�N

(4 .-' 4)4)4) - = 4)

C

a-

-� V

-C,a j

- - C

4) C

C a

-U cc

-

-JO

- > C--C- a

4)a.. �. = C

C -VS.C C

-C4 u

4 Ca C

C C C.

<U.> -

-� a

fs = 4)

C 44)- 04)

u

C - 00c - ag z - V

'C

CC,]- 3 r

- >,� - - aen" -,

- a

6'. 5 - = - U- - �) &J 0 '-c - - C -

-� - 0.) -

V -�

- a..QJ6 cc-- '

- 0�

- 6- 0 CA%.

a- C 0.�

- 6* - C- C � C a a - -

S > � CLW

- -��= -J -s-- c. at.�- -r afl -

UCC .� rC-- -

- -"---� -8 - � �V - a

- 0.oaoa ,� >'- ' C0)

- - a�n -z

- �<?A Ac2..x =

- 04 � - r -

C)

cc, %

�0

'C

z U J- 04 - -� -

C)

- - .�z- -.

z -

-� 2 - >'

- -,

00.] N

-C C s-'5 -- - a C)

60.) -'.6

a U- -- - -J >' 'U

a =- - C

-C -

4- - ________

-C -�

U

'I

- - C

- - C

- ta S U U- - C

- - 0 C -- 6 o r V - -� ;;. a, -

C)Co J -� 0'

0.) -C-> �

- -C r

'CAt

0% C

en - 0' oN

2C. -_____________ __________________ _________

00

00- a

0.. C� C r - 4)

� Q0 0

N. C U = C

- - - -a .� J�0 = -

0 4) C - -cCr, 2-.- a - .0>.CC o V - -�

00- o. � 0 - -

4) r o?� >�,. ->

V E U-

4) �C *-=C 0 =2

= C - Ca) 1:4)� C� -� e - - a- -

2 � r -'� � a 0 -

r � 0 N- = r >. N

- 00�t0 at.J

-- 1� C- C I:

.4 U. - 4-1:00 cA - ..� Cc,,

* -'C 0�U. 0

cs.C C

= 4)- 0 ar-

- c - >0o 0 �0 C -

- - - - - 0 C �-�4)

- � .-"�

=0 *-�---�� -, C.-

- tL --Y

- 0 0

z U

z -

C a

- 1: �- - -

- ., C) 4)

4) 00

- = .4

,.,.c� a., a00C

- - 0'-4 - -plo 4.4

a 00C

- 0'.

- 4)* 0'

- � 0)

'C 0 C)- 0'-'S V

at

C

'C

'a -�a. = -J

'C- Uc a.., '9

C

0 0

'C Va .0

- I- -

2: a<U. - < <C

1�

-� C .2

- 00 -00 Cl '0

- -- V'C

m 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - 04

* Z v S U

o M -: K

(N .c -~~~~~~~~~~~~~9

- -C' '~~~~~~~~~ U..

C * I)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 - -

C w) 4)

C .~~~~~~ - 'C~~~~mb

£ ~~~~ ~~~ *E~~~~~ .'~~~~~ -

C - .~~~~~~C. 6~f

UI ~ a r - *'.

~~~~ >, -C -- a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

cc ~ ~ ~ ~<~~ ;,&'.-

0' . CC0' C-

� C.

L; cc V.a

.� UtC C r� o r,

U me.. metC �me -rc

CJCUU.a-c -•

me-' -o

Cr .� 5V 0 �.cme

V � z� C

a S C. � C� a - SiC

- �

- r

L -o � �z 2 =-- -Ia -' c� -

me�.- :- -V....GOGO C C

V =

fl

'-S

- Cci

CC-d C. -

U

2

U

- V UC

- _ e- .. C

- C C

- - aU ci

- t5 L..a � C-' C

S - :C.

- .-� :0

- ci-me c� .ZO�

* meC C

= � ��*a.s -�C VOci -

S -J aC -.

- C .......U Co aciz a:

- U

-C -C

C-)o 0C

'D.C meSa -- me

cm -C C CC. .0- - - - C- a.e �. U U - =

U� a

CL C C =a

a a �- -�- e.J

cc

0'

G,

-� = 0 = -Li cp

-; Li�= 0' �

.3 C-) U:S -J

V

C0 to - -

0 C - -- Co - - to V

Vt '4 -

- 0 -cC- -

- - to - U- C - " I- --

C, - - 0 00 00� > = I-

�C - -

<rflO� �t..- -

C C r, C - -

- 0 V II IIV �0Q II II II

�0�>tL H 0.2

-- 0 0 -

.2 .2 --

Cr

z

D

r

04- -

-- CCI- I

Q'C -,

- - C- --- - U

-. '2 -

z - -,

tao -

Q I,� 0- r-. -

�- N -

'C01 -Q it + 4- 01 -

N'- 0-

-� 'C

II II ++

- * -

-J - -� - II

V 0F-

o 0 r Or

r r0 - V 0U - �- 0)o

- - - CO* - 0, �J 0 4

- On

- - C�J - -� �. o >2 00

_ - -

- 6 0)- - > 0

04 - C- >C2 O4�C�On c

L 00C- '�0

- 0± .�> �- I- '40 .-�& -U 0 04t 2 > 04 040 4 �

=0 00

0± 0V � -�

'40 '-Ct 0 0 0'�C

Ejelson AFB SAPSection 3.0Table 3-10Revision: 0Dare: July 30, 1995Page I of 3

TABLE 3-10 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS

Insbrarnent Item Checked/Serviced Feuny

Gas Chromatograph EC (Ni-633) wipe test Semiuannuall%Change columrn As neededChange gas wool plug As neededRepiace- septum As neededGases punt> checks Each new cylinderChangec fusesS As neededReacaNvate external carrier gas filler dryers WeeklyReacovate flow controller filler divers Senuirinuall'Clean and silarlize or replace glass liners or injectors As needed or quarterlNClean detectors ECD). FED/NPD As needed or annuallyClean purge v essel DailvBake trp Between each analysisReplace tamp As neededRetIlace carmine eas filters As needed .

GC/MS GCC/MS maintenance is the same asGC wi-i the following additions

Mechanical pump oil QuarterlyVacuum cnaff filter SemianinuallyTurbo pump oil AnnuallyWater filter tif applicable) SemniannuallNCompute-r air filter Sermuarmuali'Card ca2e air filter SemiuannuallNSource-clean cerarrucs. polish lenses As neededClean Doles and ceramics As neededClean contacts on the component boards As neededVacuum the component boards As neededReplace quar-tz injection port insert -As neededReplace septum As neededInjection port liner checked DailvColumn maintenance As neededDisk drive SemiuannuallvPrinter Quarterly

H-PLC Pressure WeeklyOil levels WeeklyFilters As neededPump drives Anal

________________________Fluorescence detector/deuterium lamps -Bwel

127962:0 300 Sitewide SAP

Eileson AFB SAPSection 3.0Table 3- ICRevision. 0Date: July 30. 1995Page 2 of 3


Instrument ~~~~~~~I tern CbeckedJSerieiFireur

Atomic Absorption 3-porn: calibration performed Wen serviced bySpectrophotometer repairman

Burner- head Each parameterElecmzaj

Each shiftLamrs Each parameter

Nebuitzer Each shift

Opucs Quarterly

Pumr Each shift

T~ygon aiing Each shiftClear. windows Each shiftReplace _zraphite rube As needed. or 80- 100

samplesReplace contact rings Quarterly, or asneededReplace acuariz windows Sermannuallk

Clean. furnace windows DailyAliv: - -ksround lamp QuarterlyCheca 7,aN length drive Quarterlv

lnductivelv Coupled Samje introduction system Dail%Plasma Specn-oohotometer Cshecrk Dlumps DadsCheck t=ecronjcsDaNClean. reahgi, torch Monthlv, or as neededClean netuize Monthly. orl as neededClean nuMxn chamber Monthly, or as neededCheck neinulizer press Monthly'Replace Diump rubine Daily, or as neededClean air Filters Monthly

Ion Chromatom'aph ~Change2 Diugri seals Six monthsCheck Diumbing DailyOil pumps

Weekly (leak ceck

monthlyCheck filter (inlet) WeekiyChange coluom Replaced 6 months oras neededCheck bed support Change when pressuredropsChange- fuses As neededChange Dump motor As neededReplace Diunger seals Semiannually

Clean check valve SemianinuallyClean, replace solvent reservoir filler SemiannuallyDegras pump head As neededClean, replace cell packing, degas flow cell As needed or quarterly

I'7 79620 3000 SITewide SAP

Eielson AFB SAP

Section 3.0Table 3- 10Revision: 0Date: July 30. 1995Page 3 of 3


Instimnent Item Checked/erviced Frequency

infrared Spectroohotometer Clean cells Dailv

Total Organtic Carbon Check oxvygen punr\ Each new cylinderInstrument Check heater

Add acid Monthly

UV/Vis Specnrophotomerer Clean zells and windows DailyLamp As neededWavelength checked QuarterlyServiced As needed

Refrnterators/Freezers Temperatiure checked and logged Each work da\Comoartment cleaned Quarterly

Walk-in Coolers Temperature checked and logged Each work dayUnit cleaned Quarterly

Balanices Service representative calibranon AnnuallyInternal weight train, gears. electronics Annual servce

Thermometers Calibrated jAnnualiv(lass S Weights Calibrated Annuallv

Deionized/Organopure Conducuivitv check Weeklv

Water Ion-exchange bed changed WeekldReclace filters As needed

Vacuum Pumps and Air Check performanrce WeeklyComoressor Lubncanoin. belts. etc. As needed

Water Baths Water level }Added as neededBath cleaned ]Sermannually

2 796 20 130 Sitewide SAP

Table 4-1 SWMP Sample and Analysis Summary

Parameter Analytical Well Fil Fed_____________ Method Samples DulctsBak

VOCs (GC) EPA 8OIO 22 3 3BTEX EPA 8020 66 7 7ADEC GRO EPASO015M 66 7 7ADEC DRO EPA 8 100M 66 7 7VOCs (GCIMS) EPA 8260 3 1 1SVOCs EPA 8270 9 1 1PEST.IPCB EPA 8080 9 1 1ICP metals EPA 6010 20 2 2LEAD EPA 7421 32 4 4ARSENIC EPA 7060 20 2 2

Notes: 1. sample quantities are approximate2. approximately 6 additional water samples

for 8010O and 27 water samples 8020, GRO,and DRO with appropriate QC willbe collected under RD contract

Li

'I

2 t --- zzL

2�- S:� '32-I- -o �

'-. C� UC

L U- QC- C- Li -U U

- =62

I-

- U

APPENDIX A

Site Safety and Health Plan

FINAL

SITE SAFETY AND HEALTH PLAN ADDENDUM FORSitewide Monitoring Program

0~~~~~~~-

Eielson AFB, Alaska

November 1995 12796.20

FINAL

SITE SAFETY AND HEALTH PLAN ADDENDUM FORSitewide Monitoring Program

Prepared for:

Air Force Center for Environmental ExcellenceEnvironmental Restoration Division (AFCEE/ERD)

Brooks Air Force Base, Texas 78235-5328

Prepared by:

EA Engineering, Science, and Technology3532 International St.

Fairbanks, Alaska 99701

November 1995 12796 20

David BeisterProject Manager

12796 2QEAFBSWSHP I I

PREFACE

This report presents guidance for environmental monitoring to be conducted at Eielson Air ForceBase near Fairbanks, Alaska.

This report was prepared in July 1995. Mr. Mike McGee, Air Force Center for EnvironmentalExcellence, Environmental Restoration Division was the ERD Contracting Officer'sRepresentative.

Approval:

Kenneth KilmerProgram DirectorEA Engineering, Science, and Technology

21796 D0EAI BSWSIIP I I

NOTICE

This report has been prepared for the United States Air Force by EA Engineering, Science, andTechnology to aid in the implementation of a final remedial action plan under the Air ForceInstallation Restoration Program. The limited objectives of this report and the ongoing nature ofthe IRP, along with the evolving knowledge of site conditions and chemical effects on theenvironment and health, must be considered when evaluating this report, since subsequent factsmay become known which may make this report premature or inaccurate.

Governiment agencies and their contractors registered with the Defense Technical InformationCenter should direct requests for copies of this report to the: Defense Technical InformationCenter, Cameron Station, Alexandria, VA 22304-6 145.

Non-Government agencies may purchase copies of this document from National TechnicalInformation Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22 16 1.

I 996 2`)FAFBSW SNHP I iv

Public reporting burden for this collectico of ,nformaticn is estimated to average I hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,searching existing data sources, gathenng and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information Senacomments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggesting for reducing this burden, IWashington Headquarters Services, Directorate for information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Da vis Highway, Suite 7204, Arlington,VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction project (0704-0 188), Washington D C. 20403

I AGENCY USE ONLY Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE November1995 1 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED Final

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE S. FUNDING NUMBERSSite Safety and Health Addendum for Sitewide Monitoning at Eielson Air Force Base, F4 1625-D-94-8052Fairbanks, Alaska

Delivery Order 20

6 AUTHOR(S)

OlubunmiOgunsola(EA) ______________

7 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDSESS(ES) S. PERFORMING ORGANI7ATION

EA Engineening, Science and Technology Inc REPORT NUMBER3532 International StreetFairbanks, AK 99701 N/A

9. SPONSORINGSONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORINGi)IONITORING AGENCY

REPORT NUMBER

Air Force Center for Environmental ExcellenceHO AFCEFEIERD N/A80071 Inner Circle Drive, Suite 2Brooks Air Force Base, Texas 78235-5328

ii SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

12a. DISTRIBUTIONIAVAILABILITY STATEMEmT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE

HO AFCEE/ERD, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas354 CES/CEVR Eielson Air Force Base, AlaskaAlaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Fairbanks, AlaskaUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle, Washington

13. ABSTRACT (Ma.imu. 200 word)

This document provides Safety and Health information for personnel working on the Eielson Air Force Base long term monitoning project

14 SUBJECT TERMS 1S. NUMBER OF PAGES

25

-Health and Safety Plan 16. PRICE CODE- ielson Air Force Base - Site wide Mandoting ______________

17 SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF IS SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACTREPORT THIS PAGE ABSTRACT

Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified

I12796, 'E [FB SW/SI I' V

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACRONYMS ............................................................ viii

I. INTRODUCTION

2. SITE INFORMATION....... ... ........................................ 22.1 SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION ................. 22.2 ORGANIZATION ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2

2.2.1 Project M anager .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.2.2 Corporate Safety and Health Manager ............... 32.2.3 Site Safety and Health Supervisor .. . . . . . . . . . . ... ... 3

2.3 EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN ..................... 32.3.1 Procedures for Handling Emergency Incidents ............ 42.3.2 Medical Emergencies .................................. .... . 5

3. SITE BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS .. ... ............. 63.1 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS .................... 6

4. HAZARD EVALUATION ...... ......... .......... 74.1 GENERAL SITE HAZARDS....................... .. 74.2 PROJECT SPECIFIC CHEMICAL HAZARDS ............... 74 3. CHEMICAL HAZARDS DESCRIPTIONS ... .......... 74.4 FLAMMABILITY AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS ............. 94.4.1 EXPOSURE LIMITS AND WARNINGS...... ........ ...... ........ 1 0

5. PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT (PPE) ................ II1

6. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD MONITORING .......... .. .... 1 2

7. DECONTAMINATION .. . .... . ... .. ...... 1 3

8. SAFETY EQUIPMENT AND SAFE WORK PRACTICE............. 148.1 SAFETY EQUIPMENT....... ....... .. .. .. .. . 148.2 COMMUNICATION .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148.3 GENERAL SAFE WORK PRACTICES ........ ... .. 14

REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 16

ATTACHMENT A Site Safety & Health Plan Review RecordATTACHMENT B Hospital Location MapsATTACHMENT C EA Accident Investigation/Incident ReportsAITACHMENT D Project Specific Hazards

12796 '0EAFBSWSHAP I V

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Exposure Limits and Warnings....................................1I0

12796 20EAFBSWSIIP Ivii

ACRONYMS

ACGIH American Conference of Governmental Industrial HygienistsAFCEE Air Force Center for Environmental ExcellenceASTs Aboveground StorageTanksBTEX Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and XyleneCOR Contracting Officer's RepresentativeCPR Cardio Pulmonary ResuscitationEA EA Engineering, Science, and TechnologyEAFB Eielson Air Force BaseNPL National Priority ListOSHA Occupational Safety & Health AdministrationPEL Permissible Exposure LimitPPE Personal Protection Equipmentsow Statement of WorkSSHP Site Safety and Health PlanSSHS Site Safety and Health SupervisorSTEL Short Term Exposure LimitSWIMP Sitewide Monitoring ProgramTLV Threshold Limit ValueTOV Total Organic VaporTPH Total Petroleum HydrocarbonsTWA Time-Weighted AverageUSEPA United States Environmental Protection AgencyUSTs Underground Storage Tanks

I 796 ZOEAFBSWSIIP I Viii

1. INTRODUCTION

This document is a draft Site Safety and Health Plan (SSHP) for the sitewide monitoring at theEielson Air Force Base (EAFB). This document was prepared as authorized in Delivery Order 210of Contract Number F41 625-D-94-8052. The purpose of this plan is to provide hazardinformation and safety procedures for employees and subcontractors involved in sitewidemonitoring operations at EAFB. All site employees and subcontractors are to be informed ofpotential hazards and site safety procedures before starting work. Subcontractors shall also abideby this SSHP or incorporate the information from this plan into their own site-specific plan. Tothis end, site employees and subcontractors will fully familiarize themselves with the contents ofthis Plan. Any questions should be addressed to either the Site Safety and Health Supervisor(SSHS) or the Project Manager listed in Section 2. After reviewing the documents, siteemployees and subcontractors must sign the Review Record (Attachment A) prior to entering anywork areas. These signatures shall indicate workers' consent to abide by the safety requirementsdescribed herein. A daily Safety and Health briefing will occur prior to each day of field activities.

'2796 'OFAFBSWVSHP II

2. SITE INFORMATION

2.1 SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION

Site: Base wide

Location: Ejelson Air Force Base

Base Point of Contact: Mike Raabe Phone: (907)377-1164

EA Project Number: 12796.20

EA Project Manager: David Beistel Office: (907) 456-4751

Home: (907) 488-6299

Client Project Manager: Steve Mc-Neil Office: (907) 377-3835

Hazardous Waste David Beistel Office: (907) 456-4751

Operations Coordinator: Home: (907) 488-6299

Site Safety & Health Senior person on site or projectSupervisor (SSHS): manager designee

EA Employees: David Beistel, John Ford, Rich Gore, Joe Muehleck, OlubunimOgunsola, Doug 0ram, Alec Winters, Melinda Wilson, JasonTurner

Corporate Safety &Health Representative: Clavton Bock, CIR Phone: (410) 584-7000

EA Corporate AccidentReporting: Toni Sircely Phone: (41/0) 584-7000

2.2 ORGANIZATION

The chain of command for safety and health-related issues will be as follows.

2.2.1 Project Manager

The responsibilities of the project manager will include the following:

* Approving the SSHP and each amendment.

* Providing overall supervisory control for all safety and health protocols ineffect for the project.

* Assigning the Site Manager and SSHS and ensuring that the assigned onsitestaff will enforce all provisions of the approved SSHP.

2 '796 2LEAF B S~ SuI I P12

2.2.2 Corporate Safety and Health Manager

The responsibilities of the Corporate Safety and Health Manager will include the following:

* Approving the SSHP and each amendment.* Providing technical support to the SSHS, particularly in the modification

for site safety and health requirements or work plans.

2.2.3 Site Safety and Health Supervisor

The SSHS will be onsite at all times throughout the project and will be responsible for dailycompliance with site safety and health requirements. The SSHS responsibilities include thefollowing:

* Implementing the SSHP.

* Stopping work when unacceptable safety and health risks exist.

* Providing an initial safety and health briefing to all site workers andvisitors, and providing weekly safety and health meetings during the projectperformance. (Daily meetings will be conducted during intrusiveactivities.)

* Conducting or delegating any necessary monitoring.

* Establishing and ensuring compliance with site control areas andprocedures.

* Supervising decontamination to ensure complete decontamination of allpersonnel, tools, and equipment.

* Investigation of incidents/accidents and preparing any incident reports, asnecessary.

* Addressing all safety and health related issues in the field.

2.3 EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN

The following telephone numbers should be called in case of emergency:

Police: On-base: 911 Off-base: 911

Ambulance: On-base: 911 Off- base: 91 1

Nearest on-base hospital or clinic: Eielson AFB Clinic (military personnel only except for lifeor death emergencies)

12796 ZOFA[ BSWSIIP I 3

Address and Phone: 3349 Central Avenue Phone: (907) 377-2259Eielson AFB

Driving directions: Driving directions to Eielson Clinic will be determined at each site.

Off-base hospital or clinic: Fairbanks Memorial Hospital Off Base: 9111650 Cowles Street Emergency: (907) 452-8 181Fairbanks, Ak 99801

Ambulance Phone: 911

Poison Control Center: Phone: (907) 456-7182

Driving Directions: From EAFB go north on the Richardson Highway turn right on the ParksHighway exit (see map Attachment B). Turn right at Lathrop Street exit that is the first trafficlight. The hospital is approximately 1/4 mile on the right-hand side of the road.

2.3.1 Procedures for Handling Emergency Incidents

In the event of an emergency, the information available at that time must be properly evaluatedand the appropriate steps taken to implement the emergency response plan. The SiteManager/Safety and Health Supervisor shall assume command of the situation, call theappropriate emergency services, and take other steps necessary to gain control over theemergency. If obtrusive work is expected then predesignated evacuation locations will beidentified during the daily Safety and Health meetings.

In the event of an accident/incident, SSHS and the Corporate Safety and Health Manager will benotified immediately. The base point of contact and the Air Force Center for EnvironmentalExcellence (AECEE), Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) will also be notifiedimmediately via telephone, by the project Manager. Written notification of any results thatindicate an imminent health risk, incidents, or accidents, as required by the Statement of Work(SOW) will follow.

Give the following information when reporting an emergency:

I . Name and location of person reporting;2. Location of accident/incident;3 . Name and affiliation of injured party;4. Description of injuries, fire, spill, or explosion;5. Status of medical aid and/or other emergency control efforts;6. Details of any chemicals involved;7. Summary of accident, including suspected cause and time the accident occurred;S. Temporary control measures taken to minimize further risk.

This information is not to be releasedlunder any circumstances to parties other than those listed inthis section and emergency response team members Once emergency response agencies have

I12296 2(}FAl BSWSHP 4

been notified, the EA Project Manager, Site Manager/Safety and Health Supervisor, andCorporate Safety and Health Manager or Human Resources must be notified immediately.

2.3.2 Medical Emergencies

Employees and subcontractors should always be alert for signs and symptoms of illnesses relatedto chemical, physical, and disease factors onsite. Severe injuries resulting from accidents must berecognized as emergencies and treated as such.

In a medical emergency, the Site Manager/SSHS will stop all work and employees andsubcontractors must move to safe conditions. Employees and subcontractors currently trained infirst aid will evaluate the nature of the injury and initiate first aid assistance, First aid shall beadministered only to limit further injury and stabilize the victim. The local Emergency MedicalServices must be notified immediately. No persons shall re-enter the area until the cause of theinjury or symptoms has been determined. A fellow EA worker must accompany injured workersto the hospital. Site employees and subcontractors should not attempt to transport victims havinga life-threatening illness or injury.

The Site Manager/SSHS must complete an EA Accident Investigation Report (Attachment 3) andsubmit it to Corporate Human Resources (Toni Sircely, Fax 410-711-1780). Types of incidentsinclude:

* Job-related injuries and illnesses;

* Accidents resulting in loss or damage to property.

* Accidents involving vehicles and/or vessels, whether or not they result in damageto property or employees and subcontractors.

* All accidents in which there may have been no injury or property damage, butwhich have a high probability of recurring with at least a moderate risk to EAemployees and subcontractors or property.

* Any accident which results in a fatality or the hospitalization of 3 or moreemployees and subcontractors must be reported within 8 hours to the U.S. Dept. ofLabor via the Corporate Safety and Health Manager.

12796 ZCEAFBSWSIfP 1 5

3. SITE BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS

Eieison AFB (EAFB) a major flying and training military installation near Fairbanks Alaska, hasbeen in operation for more than 50 years. EAFB; was listed on the National Priorities List (NPL)in 1989. As part of the environmental restoration activities at the base, ground water and surfacewater quality is monitored under the Sitewide Monitoring Program (SWMP). This SWMPinvolves extensive collection of ground water samples from existing monitoring wells at sourceareas throughout the base. Details of the SWMP are given in the work plan for this project.

3.1 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS

Ground water monitoring will be performed at the sites described in the work plan (sections I and2). In addition, EA will assess the well condition, and if needed, perform minor or routine wellmaintenance activities. Depending on the condition of the existing wells, some wells may need tobe abandoned or reinstalled.

12796 20EAFBSWSIIP I 6

4. HAZARD EVALUATION

4.1 GENERAL SITE HAZARDS

Hazards anticipated at the sites as described in Section 3 are listed below. Discussion of thesehazards are located in Attachment D.

* Biological Hazards (i.e., moose, insects)* Chemical Hazards* Drilling Hazards* Fire/Explosive Hazards* General Physical Hazards (i.e., slip/fall hazards)* Material Handling/Moving/Lifting Hazards* Noise Hazards (i.e.,flight line)* Traffic Hazards* Weather and Temperature Hazards

4.2 PROJECT SPECIFIC CHEMICAL HAZARDS

Chemicals that have been detected during previous monitoring are described in section 2 of theSWMP Work Plan.

4.3. CHEMICAL HAZARDS DESCRIPTIONS

Diesel range organics (DRO), gasoline range organics (GRO) and metals such as lead arebelieved to be the most likely chemicals of concern (COC) in most of the sites that will beencountered. Although variable in composition, these petroleum products can be characterized ina general manner. Gasoline is approximately 80 percent paraffins in the C, to C,4 range. 6 percentolefins, and 14 percent aromatics; additives (e.g., ethylene dichioride, ethylene dibromide,tetraethyl lead, and tetramethyl lead) are sometimes present in small amounts. Diesel containsparaffins and cycloparaffins in the C11 to C,4 range and very low levels of aromatic hydrocarbons.

Although the composition of gasoline varies, the acute health effects of exposure are reported tobe similar for all blends. Exposure to gasoline can occur by inhalation and dermal contact.Inhaled gasoline generally acts as an anesthetic and mucous membrane irritant. Intoxication,headaches, blurred vision, dizziness, and nausea are the most commonly observed symptoms ofoverexposure to gasoline. Diesel fuel is not sufficiently volatile to constitute an acute inhalationhazard in unconfined spaces. It is not readily absorbed through intact skin, but it can penetrateabraded skin. Dermal contact with gasoline, or diesel can dry the skin, which can lead to skinirritation, infection, and dermatitis.

The risks and hazards associated with the major classes of petroleum hydrocarbons present ingasoline and diesel are described below

PARAFFINS (alkanes) include n-butane, n-hexane, isobutane, isopentane andcyclopentane. There is no evidence that these compounds are mutagenic (i.e.,

22196 hL)FAFBSWS iFP i 7

chemicals which cause changes of the genetic material in reproductive cells,resulting in deformed offspring), teratogenic (substances which cause deformitiesin unborn offspring that have already been conceived), or carcinogenic (substanceswhich cause cancer). Exposures to hexane can cause peripheral nerve damage. Ingeneral, these compounds have low human toxicity and the potential toxicity tendsto decrease with increasing carbon chain length. Cycloparaffins are less toxic thantheir equivalent straight-chain paraffins.

* OLEFINS (alkenes) include trans-2-pentene and 2-methyl-2-butene. Thesecompounds have little inherent human toxicity, although adverse health effects canresult from exposure to high levels of some olefins.

* ALKYBENZENES (Aromatics) of greatest concern are benzene, toluene, xylenes,and ethylbenzene. Benzene is a human carcinogen, but the others have not beenidentified as carcinogens. Adverse effects of the aromatics include renal failure,liver damage, central nervous system damage, and respiratory tract damage.Benzene and other aromatics can be absorbed through the respiratory tract and theskin, so both inhalation and dermal contact are potential routes of exposure.

Other potential contaminants contained in used oils are cadmium, chromium, lead and gasolineadditives.

CADMIUM: The symptoms of overexposure to cadmium are chest painand tightness, headache, muscle aches, nausea, diarrhea, coughing,chills, and difficulty in breathing. Inhalation is the major route ofexposure.

* CHROMIUM: The symptoms of overexposure to chromium arerespiratory irritation and skin irritation. Both dermal contact andinhalation are potential routes of exposure.

* LEAD: Overexposure to lead can result in central nervous system damage,kidney and blood damage, and other effects. The symptoms ofoverexposure to inorganic lead are lassitude, insomnia, abdominal pain,and constipation. Inhalation is the major route of exposure.

Gasoline additives may be present in small amounts at some contaminated sites, but are mostlikely not a concern in most sites. The following additives are the ones most likely to beencountered:

Tetraethyl Lead (TEL)

Tetraethyl lead is used as an anti-knock gasoline additive. Symptoms of overexposure include:dermatitis, headache, dizziness, sleeplessness and restlessness, disorientation, depressed appetite,nausea and vomiting, low blood pressure, delusions, hallucination, mania and depression.

12796 2OEAFBSWSf HPI

Tetramethvl Lead

Tetramethyl lead is used as an anti-knock gasoline additive. It is fatal by lead-poisoning uponswallowing, vapor inhalation, or skin absorption.

Ethyknv Dibromide

Ethylene dibromide is toxic by inhalation, ingestion or contact with skin and eyes. Symptoms ofoverexposure include skin infections, nausea, stomach ache, and jaundice.

Isopropanol

Isopropanol is used as an antifreeze agent and in decontamination procedures, and is toxic by skinabsorption, inhalation, or ingestion. It is a colorless liquid with the odor of rubbing alcohol.Symptoms of overexposure can include: conjunctivitis, corneal ulcerations, skin irritation,irritation of the respiratory tract, headache, nausea, dizziness, decreased blood pressure, vomiting,hematemesis, anuria, uremia, hepatomegaly, and anemia.

First Aid- In general, if direct skin contact with any of these chemicals occurs, immediatelywash the contaminated skin with water. If these chemicals penetrate the clothing,immediately remove the clothing and wash the skin with water. If symptoms occurafter washing, get medical attention immediately.

When these chemicals contact the eyes; immediately wash the eyes with largeamounts of water, occasionally lifting the lower and upper lids. Get medicalattention immediately.

If a person breathes large amounts of these chemicals, move them to fresh air atonce. Get medical help as soon as possible, and keep the affected person warmand at rest. Should the person lose consciousness, monitor their breathing andpulse and if needed assist breathing or give cardio pulmonary resuscitation (CPR)until help arrives. If these chemicals are swallowed get medical attentionimmediately.

4.4 FLAMMABILITY AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS

Flammability is a primary hazard associated with petroleum hydrocarbons but is expected to be ofminimal concern during this project. The lower explosive limits of gasoline, diesel, and methaneis 1.4 percent (14,000 ppm), 0.9 percent (9,000 ppm), and 5.5 percent (55,000 ppm) respectively,

1 2796 20EAFBSWSHP I 9

4.4.1 EXPOSURE LIMITS AND WARNINGS

The exposure limits for the chemicals discussed in Section 4.3 are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Exposure Limtits and Warnings. _________

OSHA ACGIH' Carcinogens/Contaminant *]PEl "TLV Suspected Carcinogens

Benzene 10 ppm 10 ppm Suspected carcinogen

Cadmium 0.2 mg/rn3 0.01 mg/rn3 Suspected carcinogen

Chromium 0.5 mg/rn3 soil - 0 05 mng/rin3 acngn*______________________________ ~w ater - 0 5 mng/rn3 a c no e

Ethylbenzene I00 ppm 1 00 ppm -

Lead 0 05 mg/rn 3 0 15 rnglm3 Suspected carcinogen

Phenol 5 ppm 5 ppm ---

Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 100 ppm 25 ppm ______________

Toluene 20ppm 50 ppm ---______________

Trichloroethylene (TCE) I100 ppm 50 ppm Suspected carcinogen

Vinyl Chloride I ppm 5 ppm Carcinogen (5 ppm STEL)

Xylene 100 pm 10 pp -M

* The Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) Permissible Exposure Limits (PEL s) arefederal standards for an 8 hour work peniod.

The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACCIH) Threshold Limit Values(TLV's) are recommended limits for an 8 hour work period

Certain water insoluble compounds are carcinogenic

STEL Short term exposure limit not to be exceeded for longer than IS minutes 4 times/day

Amrericatn Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygenienists

I1-96 2UEAFBSWSFIP I 10

5. PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT (PPE)

Level D PPE and Clothing should be used at all of the sites. The following equipment ismandatory:

* Nitrile gloves when sampling groundwater

* Steel toed boots

* Safety glasses with side shield or face shield when working near heavy equipmentor around splash hazards (i.e. sampling wells)

* Orange traffic vest when working near traffic or drilling operations

* Hearing protection (either ear plugs or ear muffs) when working near drilling

equipment and the flight line

1 2796 20EAFBSWSNP I I

6. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD MONITORING

The SHSS will measure or assign someone to measure the total organic vapor (TOV)concentration in the breathing zone (the breathing zone is defined by OSHA to be a hemisphereforward of the shoulders with a radius of approximately 6 to 9 inches) before sampling begins. Ifthe TOV level increases above 10 ppm or levels approach the TLV or PEL for any of thesuspected contaminants, the SSHS must determine whether the level of PPE should be increased,and must notify site personnel immediately.

12796 2OEAFBSWSTP I 12

7. DECONTAMINATION

Contaminated PPE will be placed in appropriate containers for disposal. Nondisposable PPE willbe washed with detergent and rinsed with water. Monitoring equipment will be cleaned accordingto instrument instructions. Personnel will wash hands before eating and before leaving the site.

12796 2UEAFBSWSfIP I 13

8. SAFETY EQUIPMENT AND SAFE WORK PRACTICE

8.1 SAFETY EQUIPMENT

The following safety equipment must be present at each site at all times:

* ABC-type fire extinguisher;

* Eye wash kit;

* Drinking water; and

* Soap and water.

8.2 COMMUNICATION

A cellular phone will be provided in each work area during the sampling.

8.3 GENERAL SAFE WORK PRACTICES

* The buddy system must be used (at minimum two people working together) whensampling in remote areas.

* Avoid skin contact with Permanone and DEFT bug repellant, it should be appliedonly on articles of clothing. These compounds may cause allergic and toxic effectson children and adults with repeated use;

* Smoking, eating, drinking, and chewing either tobacco or gum is prohibited in theexclusion zone;

* Prior to initiating work at the site, the SSH-S must identify the nearest sanitationfacility for site personnel in each area;

* Potential ignition sources must be minimized. EA and subcontractor vehicles mustnot be parked in locations which block fire hydrants, access to emergencyequipment, or exits from buildings;

* Site personnel must wash hands and face pnior to leaving the site. If drinking wateris not available at the site, potable water must be provided;

* Prescription drugs must not be taken unless specifically approved by a physicianwho understands the nature of the work exposure;

* First aid treatment will be administered only by trained personnel;

* When respirators are required, facial hair that interferes with the face-to-facepieceseat must be trimmed or removed;

12796 20[AFBSWSHP I 14

* Use of contact lenses are not permitted when wearing a respirator;

* During hot or cold weather, regular rest breaks should be taken to avoidtemperature-related stress. Non-alcoholic beverages, preferably water, should beconsumed regularly to avoid dehydration; and

* Prior to work startup the SSHS must identify and demarcate work zones ifnecessary. The general public should be excluded from the work area.

12796 2,OEAFBSWSH-P I 15

REFERENCES

AFCEE. 1993. AFCEE Handbook for Installation Restoration Program. RemedialInvestigations and Feasibility Studies (RUEFS). September.

12796 2CEAFBSWSHP 1 16

Attachment A

Site Safety & Health Plan Review Record

12796 :rJE.AnSWSHP I

SITE SAFETY AND HEALTH PLAN REVIEW RECORD

SITE: Eielson AFB

I have read the Site Safety and Health Plan for this site and have been briefed on the nature, level,and degree of exposure likely as a result of participation in this project. I agree to conform to allthe requirements of this plan.

Prim NaM= intr fiitoD

12796 'OEAFBSWSHPI

Attachment B

Hospital Location Maps

12796 2OEAFBSWSMP I

-� Ii-J

34)C

�

z

K

2

___ IC

U,C.C

?A RIG~~~~~?3

is~ ~ ~~~~~s i tviir

Nq PH~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

&Ovy '~~~~~H1

Attachment C

EA Accident Investigation/Incident Reports

12796 Z0EAFBSWSHP I

ACCIDENT/LOSS REPORT

THIS REPORT MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE INJU7RED EMPLOYEES SUPERVISORAND FAXED TO EA CORPORATE HUMAN RESOURCES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ANY

ACCIDENT. THE FAX NU-MBER IS (410) 771-1780.

*NOTE* WHENEVER AN EMPVLOYEE IS SENT FOR MEDICAL TREATME-NT FOR A

WORK RELATED INJURY OR ILLNESS, PAGE 4 OF THIS REPORT MUST ACCOMPANYTHAT INDIVIDUAL TO ENSURE THAT ALL INVOICES/BILLS/CORRESPONDENCE ARESENT TO CORPORATE CENTER FOR TIMELY RESPONSE.

DATE OF ACCIDENT:_______ TIME OF ACCIDENT:______EX-ACT LOCATION WHERE ACCIDENT OCCURRED (including- street, citv and stare):

NAME OF TNJTJEED EMiPLOYEE:__________________HOME ADDRESS:_____________________HOME PHONE:_________ DATE OF BIRTH:_______AGE:_____SEX: M F M.ARITAL STATUS:________SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER:_________ DATE OF HIRE:____NUMBER OF DEPENDENTS:___________________EMPLOYEES JOB TITLE:___________________DEPARTMENT IN WHICH REGULARLY EMPLOYED:___________EXPLAIN WHAT HAPPENED (include what the employee was doing at the time of the accident

and how the accident occurred):_________________________

DESCRIBE THE INJURY AND THE SPECIFIC PART OF THE BODY AFFECTED (i.e.

laceration, right hand, third finger. second joint):

OBJECT OR SUBSTANCE THAT DIRECTLY INJURED EMPLOYEE:_______

NA-vffIE AND ADDRESS OF THE PHYSICIA.N (if medical attention was administered):

PLEASE ATTACH THE PHYSICIANS WRITTEN RETURN TO WORK SLIP*NOTE* A PHYSICIANS RETURN TO WORK SLIP IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ALLOWINGTHE WORKER TO RETURN TO WORK

IS THE EMPLOYEE EXPECTED TO LOSE AT LEAST ONE FULL DAY OF WORK?-WAS TEIE EMPLOYEE ASSIGNED TO RESTRICTED DUTY?_________NU-M[BER OF DAYS AN D HOURS EM[PLOYEE USUALLY WORKS PER WEEK:____LIST ALL PPE EMPLOYEE WAS WEARING AND ALL SAFETY DEVICES IN4 USE ATTHE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT:__________________

DESCRIBE THE PREVENTIVE MEASURES TAKEN TO AVERT A RECURRENCE OF THISTYPE OF INCIDENT:____________________

DATE WHEN MEASURES WERE IMIPLEMNENTED AND BY WHOM:_______

AUTOMOBILE ACCHDENT INFORMATION

AUT7HORITY CONTACTED AND REPORT #nu _____________

EA EMPLOYEE VEHICLE YEAR, MAKE AND MODEL___________V.I.N.__________PLATE/rAG#_____________OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS:_________________

DRIVER'S NAMEAND ADDRESS:________________

RELATION TO IN4SURED:______ DRIVER'S LICENSE#______DESCRIBE DAMAGE TO YOUR' PROPERTY:______________

DESCRIBE DAIVLAGE TO OTHER VEHICLE OR PROPERTY __________

2

OTHER DRIVER'S NAME AND ADDRESS: ______________

OTHER DRIVER'S PHONE:________

OTHER DRIVER'S INSURANCE COMPANY AND PHONE:_________

LOCATION OF OTHER VEHICLE:__________________

NAME, ADDRESS AND PHONE OF OTHER INJURED PARTIES:________

WITNES SESNAME:_________PHONE:____________ADDRESS:_______________________STATEMENT:_____________________

_________________SIGNATURE: ___________

NAME:________ PHONE:_____________A DDRESS:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

STATE-M ENT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_________________SIGNATURE: ___________

NAMEOFSUPERVISOR:____________________

DATE OF THIS REPORT: ____ REPORT PREPARED BY:________

I have read this report and the contents as to how the accident/loss occurred is accurate to the

best of my knowledge

Signature: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D ate: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Injured Employee

3

I am seekins medical treatment for a work related injury/illness.

Please forward all bills/invoices/correspondence to:

EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AN]) TECHNOLOGY. INC.

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

11010 MCCORMICK ROAD

HIJNT VALLEY, MD 21031

ATTENTION: TOMI SLIRCELY

(410) 584-7000

INCIDENT REPORT

THIS REPORT IS TO BE COMPWLETED WHEN A NETAR. MISS OCCURS THAT COULDHAkVE POTE-NT-IALLY RESULT IN SERIOUS PHYSICA-,L HARM. PLEASE F.AX THISFORM TO EA CORPORATEE HEALTH AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT7 AT ('10) 7/71 1780.

EXPLAIN WHAT HLAPPr=E (inciude what the employee was doing aE the dine the near missand how it occurred:) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

REPORT PREPARED BY:___________ DATE:_______

Attachment D

Project Specific Hazards

12796 U0EAYBSWSHP I

Physical Hazard Information Sheet: Biological Hazards

Insect Bit~es/Sjtngs. Protective outer clothing such as gloves, hard hats, and coveralls can helpreduce the potential for insect bites and stings. Insect bite symptoms may include redness, rash,swelling, chills, fever, diarrhea, and vomiting. Any worker who has been bit or stung and showssymptoms of a severe reaction should seek medical assistance immediately. Workers who knowof allergies they may have to insects must advise their employer prior to engaging in fieldactivities, and they may want to carry antidote kits.

To prevent contact with disease-carrying ticks, wear long-sleeved shints, long pants, and boots thatextend above the ankle with socks pulled over pants cuffs. Permanone insecticide may used to killdisease-bearing ticks and may be sprayed only on the outside of clothing (not directly on skin).Frequently check clothing, skin, and hair for the presence of ticks at the end of the work day. If atick attaches to the body, remove by gently tugging with tweezers where the mouth parts enter theskin. Do not kill the tick prior to removal.

Wildlife is abundant at Eielson AFB, moose in particular. Avoid wildlife if possible and do notprovoke them in any way. Wildlife, especially mothers with offspring can be dangerous. Bearsshould be avoided by at least one quarter mile, If any wildlife displays aggressive behavior, basesecurity should be notified.

12796 2OFAFBSWSHP 4-1

Physical Hazard Information Sheet: Cold Stress

Cold stress hazards are most likely to occur at low temperatures or low wind chill factors, withwet, windy conditions also contributing to risks. All personnel should be familiar with cold stresssymptoms, which include:

* Hypothermia: Cold-induced decreasing of the core body temperature that produces shivering,numbness, drowsiness, and muscular weakness. If severe enough, it can lead tounconsciousness and death.

* Frostbite: Constriction of blood vessels in the extremities, decreasing the supply of warmingblood. May result in formation of ice crystals in the tissues, causing tissue damage. Conditionmay range from frostnip which is a numbing of extremities, to deep-freezing tissue beneath theskin. Symptoms include white or grayish skin, blisters, numbness, mental confusion, failingeyesight, fainting, shock, and cessation of breathing. Death may occur from heart failure.

Pain in the extremities may be the first warning of cold stress, and precautions (see below) shouldbe taken to reduce exposure. Maximum severe shivering must be taken as a sign of immediatedanger to the worker, and exposure to cold must be immediately terminated. Personnel exhibitingsigns and symptoms of cold stress must be removed from the site, decontaminated, and givenappropriate first aid. Emergency medical services must be contacted if symptoms are severe (e.g.,more than numbness of the extremities or shivering). When air temperatures are less than 360 F(including wind chill), workers who become immersed in water or whose clothing becomes wetmust be immediately provided a change of clothing and be treated for hypothermia.

To prevent cold stress when air temperature is less than 400 F (including wind chill), personnelshould wear layers of loose-fitting clothing including insulated coveralls, head covering, andboots. Protection of the hands, feet, and head is particularly important because these are likely tobe injured first by cold. However, actual inj~ury to hands, feet, and head is not likely to occurwithout prior development of early signs of hypothermia such as numbing and shivering. Bareskin contact with cold surfaces (below 20'F) must be avoided. Personnel should wearwind-resistant outer shell to decrease wind chill effects. No continuous exposure to cold ispermitted when the air speed and temperature results in an equivalent chill temperature of 260F orless.

A temperature-dependent work regimen limiting lengthy periods of outdoor activity may benecessary. Workers entering heated shelters should remove the outer layer of clothing and loosenremaining clothing to permit sweat evaporation. Dehydration must be avoided by drinking warmdrinks or soups.

'27,06 '21,AF[ MSWSHP I 4-2

Physical Hazard Information Sheet: Drilling

The selection of locations for each drilling activity site will take into account buried utility pipes,wires, conduits, and tanks, or other potentially dangerous structures. Overhead power lines andobstructions will also be surveyed. Prior to raising the mast, the area overhead and surroundingthe rig will be checked by the drilling foreman and the SSHS. The longest conductive object onthe drill rig will be located with a minimum of 10-ft clearance from overhead lines with voltagesless than or equal to 50 kV. For lines with voltages exceeding 50 kV, the longest drill rig objectmust be at least I10 ft plus 4 in. for every 10 kV over 50 kV (e.g., for 250 kV line, clearance mustbe at least 16.7 ft). The client will inform EA of the voltages of any overhead lines in the vicinityof drilling operations.

When rotary drilling/sampling, drill rods will not be racked more than 1.5 times the height of themast. During drilling operations and rig setup and takedown, all persons who enter the ExclusionZone will wear hard hats, safety shoes/boots, and safety glasses/face shields to protect personnelfrom the physical hazards.

If during drilling there is any indication that underground tanks, drums, or other containers arebeing encountered, the drilling will be halted immediately and the SSHS shall notify the ProjectManager and Corporate Safety and Health Officer (CSHO). Indications that a waste containermay have been encountered include (I) change in the speed or momentum of the auger, (2) visualexamination of auger cuttings, (3) odor noted in the cuttings, and/or (4) the presence of airbornetotal volatile organics as measured with a direct-reading instrument.

Work around drilling equipment also involves basic safety hazards (e.g-., snapping cables, slings,ropes, moving heavy equipment, slip and trip hazards, etc.). Accidents may include head injuriesfrom falling tools and equipment, hand and feet injuries due to moving equipment, and crushinginjuries from unstable equipment or careless moving of equipment. If possible, EA personnelmust remain outside the turning radius of any large moving equipment. If this is not feasible then,at a minimum, EA personnel must maintain visual contact with the equipment operator at alltimes when equipment is active.

I 2796 2OEAFBSWk iIP 14-3

Physical Hazard Information Sheet: Fire/Explosion Hazards

Explosion and fire hazards may be present at various sites due to ignition of chemicals, agitationof shock-sensitive compounds, the sudden release of materials under pressure, etc. All siteoperations must be conducted in accordance with local fire codes and regulations. Continuousmonitoring for combustible gases is required at sites where such gases may be present duringspark-generating operations. Fire extinguishers and other fire-fighting provisions may also benecessary. Site employees and subcontractors must be trained in the use of such fire-fightingequipment prior to the start of work operations. Site-specific requirements for monitoring and fireemergency equipment must be specified in the SSHP.

127% (2(IEAFBSWSHP 14-4

Physical Hazard Information Sheet:General Physical Hazards

Hazardous waste and other field operation sites include many basic safety hazards, such as:

* Holes, ditches, etc., posing fall, cave-in, and other hazards;

* Precariously positioned objects, which may cause crushing or other injuries;

* Sharp objects (e.g., nails, metal shards, glass), which may cause cuts, injection, orother injuries;

* Slippery surfaces, posing slip and fall hazards;

* Steep grades and/or uneven terrain, posing slip, trip, and fall hazards;

* Unstable surfaces (e.g., walls that may cave-in, unstable underground structures)which may pose fall, crushing, or other injuries.

Basic safety hazards can directly injure workers and create additional hazards. For example, aperson may trip due to uneven terrain, fall and be cut on rusty metal shards, and becomeinoculated with contaminants adhering to the metal.

Site personnel should look constantly, closely, and carefully for these basic safety hazards andimmediately inform the SSHS of any conditions that they feel may be hazardous.

12796 2OEAFBSWSIIP I 4-5

Physical Hazard Information Sheet: Heat Stress

Personnel working under high-temperature conditions or wearing protective clothing whileworking in warm temperatures are subject to heat stress. Symptoms of heat stress may include:

Heat Cramps:Muscle spasms in the abdomen or limbs. Frequent rest periods and fluidintake are appropriate measures to prevent or reduce heat cramps.

Heat Exhaustion:Severe dehydration; pale, clammy skin; profuse sweating; dizziness,light-headedness; slurred speech; rapid pulse; confusion; fainting;fatigue; cool skin; nausea. Affected personnel should be escorted fromthe site, decontaminated promptly, set in cool, shaded area, and givenfluids slowly.

Heat Stroke:Life-threatening condition occurring when the body'stemperature-regulating system improperly functions. Hot dry skin; rapid,deep breathing; lack of perspiration; delirium; high fever (often 1060F ormore), nausea; unconsciousness. Brain damage and/or death may occur,if body temperature is not reduced. Provide fluids, use cooling devices(hose-down or shower), call emergency medical services or transport tohospital immediately.

Prevent heat stress by resting frequently in a shaded area and consuming large quantities of freshpotable water (more than amount needed to simply "quench thirst"). Drink at least S oz of wateror Gatorade every 2 hours when temperatures exceed '75 0F.

If heat stress symptoms are wide-spread among workers or observed frequently, the SSHIS shouldimplement an appropriate work-rest period so that after 1 minute of rest, a person's heart rate(HR) does not exceed 1 10 beats per minute (bpm) based on pulse. If the HR exceeds 1 10 bpm,the next work period should be shortened by 33 percent, while the length of the rest periodremains the same. If the HR is I110 bpm at the beginning of the next rest period, the followingwork cycle should be reduced by 33 percent. A healthy individual's resting HR is usually 60-72bpm.

27,06 Y}PAFRSW SHP I 4-6

Physical Hazard Information Sheet:Material HandlinglMovinglLifting

Improper materials handling accounts for a large number of occupational injuries. Materialshandling at hazardous waste sites can vary from heavy equipment handling to manually handlingitems. Hazards associated with materials handling include physical injury, detonation, fire,explosion, and vapor generation.

When using equipment to move materials, proper work practices must be followed. Equipmentused must be designed for the task to be performed. Equipment must be inspected regularly bythe SSHS and the Site Manager, and damaged or defective equipment must be removed fromservice. Planning is critical when handling materials. The Site Manager, in conjunction with theProject Manager, must plan where the materials are to be moved, taking into consideration thecurrent location of such materials and hazards associated with moving them. Routes for movingmaterials must be clearly outlined, with paths cleaned of all obstructions so materials may betransported.

Injuries to the back and abdominal muscles from improper lifting of loads is one of the mostcommon occupational injuries reported. Such injuries can range from relatively mild strains tomajor permanently disabling injuries. Before lifting any load, employees and subcontractorsshould consider the overall weight, distribution of weight, unwieldiness or awkwardness of theload, distance to be carried, obstacles to be negotiated, site conditions, and visibility Loadsshould be inspected for slivers, sharp edges, slippery surfaces, etc. prior to lifting.

Loads should be lifted using the power of the leg muscles rather than the back, stomach, or armmuscles. Approach the item to balance the load evenly. Never bend over when lifting. The backshould be kept straight and the arms nearly parallel with the body, The knees should be bent tograsp the load. Lifting should be done by straightening the legs, holding the load as close to thebody as possible and the back remaining as straight as possible.

Bulky, heavy loads should be handled by at least two people, ensuring that the load is level andevenly distributed between all employees and subcontractors helping to carry it. All carriersshould know the destination and path for the load.

1 ̀16 'OEAFB SW ~Hp I -

Physical Hazard Information Sheet: Noise Hazards

Work around large equipment often creates excessive noise. The effects of noise can include:

* Workers being startled, annoyed, or distracted;

* Physical damage to the ear, pain, and temporary and/or permanent hearing loss;

* Communication interference that may increase potential hazards due to the inabilityto warn of danger and provide for proper safety precautions to be taken.

If workers are subjected to noise exceeding an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) sound levelof 85 dBA (decibels on the A-weighted scale), feasible administrative or engineering controlsshall be instituted to reduce noise levels to or below the permissible values. All personnelexposed to excessive noise levels shall be provided with and shall wear a hearing protectiondevice which effectively protects the workers. OSHA regulations on noise can be found in 29CFR Part 1910.95.

12796 2CIFAVBSWSIIP I 4-8

Physical Hazard Information Sheet:Vehicle and Pedestrian Traffic Hazards

The traffic hazards section discusses potential hazards associated with work in areas with traffic.Precautions and safety measure when working in traffic areas, specially areas with heavyequipment traffic are also discussed.

1 279 2OEAFBSWSHP I

APPENDIX B

Base Support Agreement

F41624-94-D 80 2 1/1=1AtaChffent 4

4I17Z~~~~A DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCEPae2o3PACIFIC AIR FORCES

FROM: 254 CES/CC2258 Central Ave, Ste I oEielson AFE AK 99702-2225 t u G

SUBlJ: Base Support Agreement

TO: AZCEE/ESRATTN: Mr. Mike McGhee5001 Thnier Circle Dr, Ste 2Brooks APE TX 78235-5328

I. in support of the FY794 In1stallation Restoration procram (ZEP)effort to be conducted at Eielson ATBIE, Selson agrees to -provide orarrange for the following:

a. Provide access to any available= 2xisting 1RI/FSdocumentation, engineering plans, drawings, diagraMs, aerialphotocranhs, digitized man flies, etc.

b. Provide office symbols and points Of contact f or allrecuirec canerdork.

c. Assign accumulaticon -cints withi4n the -install-ation to whIchthe contractor- can deliver any drill Cuttizcs or 'deliinstallation/develocment fluids generatec f:m the required workwhich are susnected to be hazardous.

c. :eronnel derr ''-':n acces, er:± :asses, and/crentry. ze=r-:s within :~ne week :f w-r:::en notzfz=a::on. Thecontractor shall provide the names, social security 7nlmner.verniclerecistration infcniation, and citi4-ensru:.

e. A staging area (aipproximate-ly ,QCC scuare fe-et) forstorina ecuit-ment and supplies. The security; of the equipmentShall be the contractor's resvonsibili-4v.

f. A supply (e.g., fIre hydrant, stand ;ipe, etc.) of largecuantities Cf potable water for equi~menz cleaning, etc. Ulse off Ire hydrant will be coordinated by base POC within ten workingdays of written notification of first day Of antizi_'ated use.

g. A paved area where driilinai ecuirment can be cleaned anddecontaminnated. A source of potable water (i. e., ord-inary outdoorwater fAucet) and a 110/111! VAC electri4cal cutlet must be availablewithin 25 -feet of the paved area for steam c:leaner hookun.Drainage from this area should be thro-ugh an oil/water separator toa sanitary sewer. The contractor shall be responsible formaintaining the oil/water separator and removing any and allsediments that may clog the dra-,ns or rendler the selnaratorinoperable.

F41624-94.DaW/002AdaChMent 4

Page 3 of 3

h. A set of keys to the locks on any existing test ormonitoring wells.

2. A contractor shall be responsible for making any requ.ests foradditional support in writing to the Environmental Managementoffice (354 CES/CEV). Additional support requests will beevaluated on a case-by-case basis.

3. Any quest ions may be referred to Capt Merrymon, at (907) 377-1164.

STEvflI C. BOYCE, Lt Cal, USAFCommander, 354th Civil Engineering Squadron

F41624-944-840521/0021Aflachment 4

Page I of 3

DE-PARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCEPACIIC AIR FORCESS JO. ~~~~~~~~MAY 195

Mlema for Re.-ora

Subiect:- Adendum to the Base Support Lcaer

I, L Col Steven C. Boyce, have been deiegazed authonry by the Eieiscn msnjJa~daaCommnder, Cal Thonmas 0. Flemmg& Jr, to obligate bas resources in suDpart of theEe~son lnsn2iann Resrtionn Prwnam as detailed in the antsched Base Sunport Lenr,dated 30 Nov 93.

Sina C- EOYCELLRCOL USAFBa2 Civii Engsneor-conmmand.,

Sitewide Monitoring Programalaskacollection.library.uaf.edu/eafbsc/cd1/AR386-1.pdfMr. Mike McGee...

Documents

Transcript of Sitewide Monitoring Programalaskacollection.library.uaf.edu/eafbsc/cd1/AR386-1.pdfMr. Mike McGee...