SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERATOR SPILL AT TUPPERWARE …

SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERATOR SPILL

AT TUPPERWARE CAMPUS IT BUILDING AT THE

TUPPERWARE BRANDS CORPORATION 14901 SOUTH ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAIL

ORLANDO, FLORIDA

FDEP Facility I. D. No. 48‐8521966

OCTOBER 2017

Prepared for:

Tupperware Brands Corporation 14901 South Orange Blossom Trail Orlando, Orange County, FL 32837

Prepared by:

HSW Engineering, Inc. 605 E. Robinson St., Suite 308

Orlando, Florida 32801 (407) 872‐6893

HSW Project No: 6CN800101

(407) 872‐6893 ■ 605 E. Robinson St.., Suite 308 ■ Orland, FL 32801 ■ www.hsweng.com Engineering and Scientific solutions within your reach…

P:\6CN800101 Tupperware\08 Reports ‐ Submittals ‐ Permits\Site Assessment_JPC\Tupperware IT Bldg_2017 10 09.docx

October 9, 2017 Orange County Environmental Protection Department (OCEPD) Attn: Mr. Kevin Thornton Senior Environmental Specialist 3165 McCrory Place, Suite 200 Orlando, Florida 32803 Re: Site Assessment Report

Tupperware Brands Corporation 14901 South Orange Blossom Trail Orlando, Florida 32837 FDEP FAC ID No: 48‐8521966

HSW Project No: 6CN800101 Dear Mr. Thornton: HSW Engineering, Inc. (HSW) appreciates the opportunity to submit this Site Assessment Report (SAR) to OCEPD on behalf of Tupperware Brands Corporation (Tupperware) after conducting site assessment activities consisting of monitoring well installation, groundwater sampling, and diesel fuel spill recovery activities at the referenced facility. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, HSW Engineering, Inc. Andrew M. Lawn, M.S., P.G. Jason P. Cicchetti Senior Hydrogeologist Project Engineer 850‐765‐4480 407‐872‐6893 AML/JPC/kmr Attachments cc: Kimberly Bauman at [email protected] , Tupperware Brands Corporation

Tupperware Brands Corporation Generator Spill at Tupperware Campus IT Building

HSW Engineering, Inc. ■ www.hsweng.com 2 Engineering and Scientific solutions within your reach…



HSW Engineering, Inc. ■ www.hsweng.com ii Engineering and Scientific solutions within your reach…


This page intentionally left blank.


HSW Engineering, Inc. ■ www.hsweng.com iii Engineering and Scientific solutions within your reach…


CONTENTS

STATEMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REVIEW .............................................................. I

1. PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................................................. 1

2. FIELD ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................ 2 2.1 Soil Assessment ............................................................................................................... 2

2.2 Monitoring Well Installation ........................................................................................... 2

2.3 Groundwater Sampling ................................................................................................... 3

2.3.1 Groundwater Elevations ................................................................................................ 3

2.3.2 Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results .................................................................. 4

2.4 Multiphase and Soil Vapor Extraction Well Installation ................................................. 4

2.5 Dual Phase Extraction System Installation ...................................................................... 4

2.6 System Operation ............................................................................................................ 5

2.6.1 Emissions Monitoring .................................................................................................... 5

2.6.2 Free Product Gauging .................................................................................................... 5

2.6.3 Absorbent Socks ............................................................................................................ 6

2.6.4 Sub‐slab Vapor Exhaust System ..................................................................................... 6

2.6.5 Sub‐slab Vapor Exhaust System Air Monitoring ............................................................ 7

3. FINDINGS ....................................................................................................... 8

4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................... 10 TABLES 1. Soil Screening Summary 2A. Soil Analytical Summary – VOCs & TRPH 2B. Soil Analytical Summary – Non‐Carcinogenic PAHs 2C. Soil Analytical Summary – Carcinogenic PAHs 3. Well Construction Details 4. Groundwater Elevation Summary 5A. Groundwater Monitoring Well Analytical Summary – VOCs, EDB, & 8 RCRA Metals 5B. Surficial Groundwater Analytical Summary – PAHs and TRPH 5C. Surface Water Analytical Summary – VOCs 6. Air Sample Analytical Summary 7. Free Product Measurement Summary 8. Absorbent Sock Product Thickness Summary


HSW Engineering, Inc. ■ www.hsweng.com iv Engineering and Scientific solutions within your reach…


FIGURES 1. Aerial Map 2. Site Map 3. Soil Quality 4A. Groundwater Contour Map, April 20, 2017 4B. Groundwater Contour Map, June 5, 2017 5. Surface Water and Groundwater Quality (Feb. & June 2017) 6. Sub‐Slab Vapor Exhaust System Details APPENDICES A. FDEP Storage Tank Facility Discharge Site Inspection Report and SWS Incident Report B. Soil Boring Logs with Equipment Calibration Logs and Well Completion Logs and Permits C. Groundwater Sampling logs with equipment calibration logs D. Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Report E. Photolog – DPE System and Monitoring Well Installation F. Soil Disposal Laboratory Analytical Report G. PCW Waste Manifests H. Photolog – Absorbent Socks I. Exhaust Fan Laboratory Analytical Report




1. PROJECT BACKGROUND

The site assessment area, hereto referred as the “Site,” is located on the eastern side of the south wall of the IT Building associated with Tupperware located at 3175 N Orange Blossom Trail, Kissimmee, Osceola County, Florida. The Site is located along the southern boundary of the overall Tupperware campus and is bounded directly to the north by the IT building, to the south by a cypress wetland area, and to the west and east by ponds. An aerial map indicating the approximate Site location is provided as Figure 1. According to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Storage Tank Facility Discharge Site Inspection Report dated February 13, 2017, on February 10, 2017, approximately 750 gallons of diesel fuel spilled outside the generator room and impacted groundwater due to a failure of the generator day tank fill level device. Immediately following the release, on February 10, 2017, SWS Environmental Services (SWS) was contracted through Triumvirate Environmental, Inc. (TEI) to mobilize to the Site and perform emergency remedial response activities. These activities were summarized in an Incident Report dated April 21, 2017 prepared by SWS and submitted to TEI. Based on this report, from February 10 through 15, 2017, SWS removed approximately 36.96 tons of diesel impacted soil and approximately 155 gallons of diesel impacted water, including approximately 100 gallons of free floating diesel fuel. In addition, SWS collected three confirmatory side wall samples (CS‐1 through CS‐3) for laboratory analysis from the east, west, and south walls of the excavation prior to backfilling. Results of the confirmation soil samples indicated that no contaminants of concern were found to exceed Soil Cleanup Target Levels (SCTLs) for residential, commercial, or leachability standards, per Chapter 62‐777 F.A.C., Table II. On March 28, 2017, SWS transported this waste to Clark Environmental, Incorporated (Clark) for thermal treatment. A copy of the FDEP Inspection Report and Incident Report are provided in Appendix A. On February 17, 2017, HSW conducted a site visit and observed a portion of the soil source removal excavation along the building remained open to allow on‐going recovery of diesel fuel free product (which apparently spread beneath the building) that accumulated on the exposed groundwater surface. Free product floating on groundwater at a depth of approximately 3 to 4 feet below ground surface was observed at two areas where groundwater had been exposed near the wall of the building. Utility lines, including fiber optics, were also observed in the open excavation area. The objective of the site assessment activities was to evaluate the horizontal and vertical extent of diesel fuel contamination attributed to the generator day tank spill, as well as, the installation and implementation of a dual phase extraction (DPE) system designed to recover free product and petroleum contact water (PCW). Below is a summary of the completed assessment and recovery activities followed by conclusions and recommendations based on the assessment data.




2. FIELD ACTIVITIES

HSW developed a site‐specific health and safety plan (SSHASP) that was used by our personnel during field services. Prior to commencement of on‐site activities, HSW held a pre‐site entry meeting to review health and safety precautions for this project with field staff and subcontractors. HSW performed fieldwork in a United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Level D work uniform consisting of hard hats, safety glasses, protective gloves, and steel‐toed boots. All HSW field personnel assigned to the project have completed required Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) training in accordance with Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations (29 CFR) Part 1910.120. Utility locates were called in and were completed prior to the commencement of field services. 2.1 Soil Assessment On April 12, 2017, HSW oversaw the installation of five soil borings (DW‐1 and MW‐1 through MW‐4) by Groundwater Protection (GP), a Florida‐licensed drilling contractor. Prior to soil boring installation, HSW utilized Ground Penetrating Radar Systems, Inc. (GPRS) to locate underground utilities at each boring location. Following completion of the underground utility locate, HSW and GP began installing soil borings. Soil borings DW‐1, MW‐1 and MW‐2 were advanced using a three‐inch stainless‐steel hand auger bucket to five feet below land surface (ft BLS) followed by five‐foot MacroCore® samplers advanced via direct push technology to 20 ft BLS in DW‐1 and 12 ft BLS in MW‐1 and MW‐2. Soil borings MW‐3 and MW‐4 were advanced via hand auger to 7.5 ft BLS for MW‐3 and 11 ft BLS for MW‐4, as each of these locations were inaccessible for the DPT drill rig. During installation of each soil boring, soil samples were collected continuously from surface to termination depth to identify and log lithology, as well as determine the absence or presence of diesel fuel impacted soil by field screening each sample with an organic vapor analyzer equipped with a photo ionization detector (OVA/PID). Please note, samples for lithology and screening were not collected from soil boring MW‐1 as it was installed immediately adjacent to the west of DW‐1 (< two feet); therefore, the lithology and screening results from DW‐1 can accurately represent subsurface conditions in MW‐1. Based on the lithologic descriptions, the Site is predominately underlain with fine sand from surface to approximately 20 ft BLS. Based on the OVA/PID results, contaminated soil (OVA/PID between 10 parts per million (ppm) and 500 ppm) and excessively contaminated soil (OVA/PID >500 ppm), as defined by Chapter 62‐780 FAC, was not found in each soil boring installed, except for soil boring MW‐3 at depths of two and three ft BLS with OVA/PID readings of approximately 67.5 ppm and 123.2 ppm, respectively. Soil generated during soil boring installation was spread onsite, except for soil from two to three feet BLS in MW‐3; this soil was drummed. A soil boring location map showing the approximate confirmatory soil sample locations and soil boring locations is provided as Figure 2 and a soil quality map provided as Figure 3. The soil boring and OVA/PID calibration logs are provided in Appendix B and a table summarizing the lithology and OVA/PID screening results is provided in Table 1. The confirmation soil sample analytical result are summarized in Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. 2.2 Monitoring Well Installation On April 12, 2017, following the installation of the soil borings, HSW oversaw GP install four shallow groundwater monitoring wells, MW‐1 through MW‐4, and one deep groundwater monitoring well, DW‐




1. Monitoring well, MW‐1, serves as both a perimeter well to the east and a source area well due to its proximity to the source area, within 10 feet. Deep monitoring well, DW‐1, was installed as a vertical extent well to monitor potential vertical contaminant migration. Monitoring wells, MW‐2 through MW‐4 were installed as perimeter wells to the north, south, and west. Each monitoring well was constructed out of 1.5‐inch diameter, 0.006‐inch slotted sch 40 PVC pre‐packed well screen with 30/65‐graded fine sand coupled to a 1.5‐inch diameter sch 40 PVC riser. Additional 30/65‐graded fine sand was used to fill the annular space around each prepacked well screen and typically extend above the top of the well screen approximately one to two feet followed by Portland cement grout to just below the surface. Each well was then finished with a five‐inch manhole and bolt down cover set in a 1‐ft x 1‐ft concrete well pad except for MW‐3 that was finished with a 2.5‐foot metal stickup manhole set in a 2‐ft x 2‐ft concrete well pad. Monitoring wells MW‐1, MW‐2 and DW‐1 were installed via DPT to depths of approximately 12 ft BLS in MW‐1 and MW‐2 and 20 ft BLS in DW‐1. Monitoring wells MW‐3 and MW‐4 were installed by hand to depths of approximately 7.5 ft BLS in MW‐3 and 11 ft BLS in MW‐4 by advancing a three‐inch stainless‐steel hand auger bucket through temporary four‐inch PVC casing to 12’ BLS or refusal, whichever came first. A photolog documenting the well installation activities including monitoring well completion logs and the State of Florida well permits and completion reports are provided in Appendix B. A summary of the monitoring well construction details is provided in Table 3. 2.3 Groundwater Sampling On June 5, 2016, HSW mobilized to the Site and collected groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW‐1 through MW‐4 and DW‐1. Each monitoring well was purged with a peristaltic pump in general accordance with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Standard Operating Procedures for Field Activities, DEP‐SOP‐001/01, FS‐2200, and Groundwater Sampling Variances and Clarifications for Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems Sites, PCS‐005. Following purging, each groundwater sample was placed in laboratory supplied containers, stored on wetted ice and transported to TestAmerica under proper chain‐of‐custody documentation. Purge water generated during sampling was spread on an impervious surface for volatilization. Source area monitoring well, MW‐1, was sampled for the kerosene analytical group (KAG) parameters listed in Chapter 62‐780, FAC, Table C, which include: volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by EPA Method 8270‐sim, total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) by the FL‐PRO method, EDB by EPA Method 8011, and total lead by EPA Method 6010. Samples collected from perimeter monitoring wells, MW‐2 through MW‐4, including DW‐1, were analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes and methyl‐tert‐butyl ether (BTEX/MTBE) by EPA Method 8260, PAHs by EPA Method 8270D_SIM, and TRPH by the FL‐PRO Method. Groundwater sampling and equipment calibration logs are provided in Appendix C. 2.3.1 Groundwater Elevations

HSW collected depth‐to‐water (DTW) from top‐of‐casing (TOC) measurements from each on‐Site monitoring well on April 20, 2017, and prior to sampling on June 5, 2017. Based on the April 20, 2017 groundwater elevation data, DTW fluctuated from 5.44 ft. below top‐of‐casing (ft. BTOC) in MW‐2 to 5.78 ft. BTOC in MW‐3 resulting in a groundwater flow direction towards the south/southwest. Based on the groundwater elevation data from June 5, 2017, DTW ranged from 4.06 ft. BTOC in MW‐3 to 4.64 ft. BTOC in MW‐4 resulting in a groundwater flow direction towards the west/southwest. The apparent component of flow to the west is believed to have been caused by recharge from the retention pond east of the source are, caused by recent rain that is directed from campus parking lots to the pond. Flow




to the east, toward the retention pond is likely during low precipitation seasons. DTW and water table elevation summaries are provided in Table 4 and groundwater flow direction from April and June 2017 are illustrated on Figures 4A and 4B, respectively. 2.3.2 Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results

Results of the June 5, 2017 groundwater sampling event indicated constituents in each monitoring well sample were below groundwater cleanup target levels (GCTLs) cited in Chapter 62‐777 F.A.C., Table I. Groundwater and surface water analytical results are summarized in Tables 5A, 5B, and 5C and illustrated on Figure 5. A copy of the laboratory analytical report is provided in Appendix D. 2.4 Multiphase and Soil Vapor Extraction Well Installation From April 7 through 12, 2017, Petrotech Southeast, Inc. (Petrotech) installed seven multiphase extraction (MPE) wells, MPE‐1 through MPE‐2, along the southeast edge of the IT building within the limits of the original source removal excavation area performed by SWS. Each MPE well was hand installed to approximately five ft. BLS and constructed of five feet of two‐inch diameter, 0.010‐inch slotted sch 40 PVC well screen coupled to two‐inch diameter sch 40 PVC riser that extended above the land surface approximately 0.5 feet to two feet. The annular space around the screened interval was backfilled with #57 stone from termination depth to the surface. To prevent short circuiting through the pervious land surface (i.e. pulling atmospheric air versus air from within the treatment zone) visqueen was installed at the surface to cover the area on top of each MPE well. In conjunction with the installation of the MPE wells, Petrotech installed three horizontal soil vapor extraction (SVE) wells, SVE‐1 through SVE‐3, directly under the foundation of the IT building within the limits of the excavation area. Each SVE well was hand installed using a three‐inch stainless‐steel hand auger advanced laterally under the foundation. The lateral distance of each SVE well was limited based on its location in the excavation area relative to underground utilities. SVE‐1 extended approximately eight feet under the foundation, SVE‐2 extended approximately seven feet under foundation, and SVE‐3 extended approximately six feet under the foundation. Each well was terminated with five‐feet of two‐inch diameter, 0.010‐inch slotted sch 40 PVC well screen coupled to one to three feet of two‐inch sch 40 PVC riser to outside of the foundation before extending vertically approximately two feet. A photolog documenting the location of each MPE and SVE well is provided in Appendix E and figure illustrating the approximate location of each MPE and SVE well is provided on Figure 2. Approximately eight drums of diesel impacted soil was generated during the installation of the MPE and SVE wells. On April 20, 2017, HSW collected one soil sample for drum disposal and had it sent to TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. (TestAmerica) to be analyzed for arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, selenium, silver and mercury according to EPA Method 6010B Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). Results indicated the soil was non‐hazardous and was disposed of off‐Site. A summary of the results is provided in Table 5A and a copy of laboratory analytical report is provided in Appendix F. 2.5 Dual Phase Extraction System Installation On April 12, 2017, Petrotech mobilized a dual phase extraction system trailer and holding tank to the Site for installation and operation. The system trailer included a diesel‐powered generator, knock‐out‐tank (KOT), two G‐1 granular activated carbon (GAC) vessels, and a blower capable of producing greater than 14‐inches of mercury (“Hg) vacuum and 20 standard cubic feet per minute (scfm) air flow per well.




The system was connected to each MPE well through a two‐inch suction hose connected from a male fitting on the outside of the trailer to a manifold with individual vacuum ports dedicated to each MPE well. Each vacuum port was connected from the manifold to a one‐inch sch 40 PVC drop tube installed in each MPE well through a compression fitting connected to the top of each MPE well. Each drop tube was installed just above the liquid level and was designed to capture free product, diesel impacted water (DIW), and vapors. The extracted free product and DIW was temporarily stored before being transferred to the 2,000‐gallon polytank. Extracted vapors were treated through a 55‐gallon GAC vessel connected to the outside of the trailer with four‐inch suction hose before being discharged to the atmosphere through a 10‐ft sch 40 PVC vent stack. Photographs of the system setup are provided in Appendix E. 2.6 System Operation The system was started on April 12, 2017 and operated for approximately 24 days before being shut off on May 12, 2017 and removed from the Site on May 24, 2017. The system operated at an initial vacuum and flow rate of 2” Hg at 150 scfm and was increased to a final vacuum and flow rate of 6” Hg at 160 scfm. The increase in vacuum was a result of a decrease in the groundwater elevation because of the drought conditions in the area. Approximately, 3,126 gallons of DIW was extracted and hauled offsite during the 24 days of operation. Copies of the waste manifests are provided in Appendix G. 2.6.1 Emissions Monitoring

In accordance with Chapter 62‐780.700.4(4)(a), Florida Administration Code (FAC), emissions treatment is required for the first 30 days of operation and can be discontinued if the total air emissions are less than 5.5 pounds per day (lbs/day) for any single Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) or 13.7 lbs/day for total HAPs. Based on this standard, the emissions were treated through one G‐1 GAC vessel throughout the system operation. In addition, a total of three air samples, startup, week 1, and week 2, were collected before (pre‐carbon) and after (post‐carbon) the GAC vessel, and submitted to TestAmerica for analysis of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes, and methyl tert‐butyl ether (BTEX/MTBE) per EPA Method 18. Based on the analytical results, the following detections were reported:

Pre‐carbon startup: Toluene (3.0 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3)), ethylbenzene (2.2 mg/m3), total xylenes (15.8 mg/m3), and total petroleum hydrocarbons [TPH] (430 mg/m3);

Pre‐carbon‐week 1: TPH at 59 mg/m3;

Pre‐carbon‐week 2: TPH at 16 mg/m3. Post‐carbon samples for the startup, week 1, and week 2 reported no detections for BTEX/MTBE and TPH indicating the system did not discharge emission greater than the permissible limit of 13.7 lbs/day. Based on mass recovery rates and system operation time (approximately 14 days total) an estimated mass of 12.68 lbs of TPH was recovered. A table summarizing results the air samples as well as the recovery rates and estimated mass recovered is provided in Table 6. 2.6.2 Free Product Gauging

On April 14, 2017, HSW collected baseline free product (FP) thickness measurements from each MPE well using an oil/water interface probe. Based on these measurements, FP, as defined by Chapter 62‐




780 F.A.C as non‐aqueous phase liquid in excess of 0.01‐foot thickness, was recorded in MPE wells MPE‐1, MPE‐2, MPE‐3, and MPE‐5 at thicknesses of 0.44 ft., 0.01 ft., 0.01 ft., and 0.58 ft., respectively. Following the baseline event, HSW gauged FP thickness in each MPE well on April 20, May 9, June 5, June 13, and June 30, 2017 to determine the effectiveness of the DPE system. FP was recorded in the following MPE wells as summarized in Table A below:

Table A

Date MPE‐2 MPE‐3 MPE‐4 MPE‐6 MPE‐7

FP Thickness (ft) 4‐20‐17 0.02 0.00 0.16 0.45 0.15 5‐9‐17 Dry Dry Dry 0.00 0.04 6‐5‐17 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 6‐13‐17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 6‐20‐17 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01

It should be noted that the readings collected in April and May were collected during the latter end of the dryer season, resulting in dry wells as evident by the 5/9/17 gauging event. Conversely, readings collected in June were collected during the start of the wet season following consecutive weeks of heavy rain, as evident with the rise of the groundwater table noted in each MPE well. As of the June 30, 2017 gauging event, free product does not exist in each of the MPE wells, indicating the DPE system was successful at reducing the amount of free product to below the standard. Results of each gauging event are tabulated in Table 7. 2.6.3 Absorbent Socks

Following shut down of the DPE system, Petrotech and HSW installed 1.5‐inch diameter x 18‐inch long PIG Monitoring Well Skimmer Socks in each MPE well. These PIGs are made of polypropylene and are specially designed to act as “skimmers” that float on top of the oil/water interface and absorb only oils and oil based liquids. These PIGs were deployed in each MPE well on 6/13 and 6/20 and removed approximately one week later, on 6/20 and 6/30. After removal, each PIG was observed for visual signs of staining, any staining observed was measured and recorded and each PIG was photographed with the MPE well number and date removed written on each. Each pig was then disposed of in a DOT approved drum provided by Petrotech and staged on Site for disposal off‐Site at a later date. According to the manufacturer, each sock can absorb approximately 17 ounces (oz.) or .13 gallons of oil equating to approximately 0.007 gallons per inch (gal/in). Based on this, a total of approximately 0.61 gallons of free product was absorbed from the MPE wells. A photolog of the PIGs collected on 6/13 and 6/20 is provided in Appendix H, with staining measurements and approximate adsorbed volume tabulated on Table 8 2.6.4 Sub-slab Vapor Exhaust System

Following shutdown of the DPE system, Petrotech installed a sub‐slab vapor exhaust system (SSVES) consisting of a 24‐inch solar powered exhaust fan connected to three two‐inch PVC sub‐slab vapor extraction laterals (SSVEL) through one main four‐inch PVC header pipe. The extraction system was installed as a semi‐passive system to reduce/prevent petroleum vapors from entering the building through the concrete slab. Each SSVEL was constructed of two‐inch sch 40 PVC solid pipe connected to five feet of 0.010‐inch slotted sch 40 PVC well screen and extended laterally under the building’s concrete slab approximately six (SSVE‐1), seven (SSVEL‐2), and eight feet (SSVEL‐3). Each lateral is




connected to a four‐inch sch 40 PVC header pipe that connected to the solar exhaust fan installed on the roof directly above the generator room. The solar panel used to power the exhaust fan was installed at an angle of approximately 18‐degrees from horizontal and at peak performance can produce enough power to generate air flow rates of up to 500 cubic feet per minute (cfm). A detailed figure illustrating the location of the sub‐slab vapor exhaust system is provided as Figure 6. 2.6.5 Sub-slab Vapor Exhaust System Air Monitoring

On June 30, 2017, HSW collected one air sample, Exhaust Fan‐1, from the effluent side of the sub‐slab vapor exhaust system. The sample was collected by extracting air at a rate of approximately 200 ml/min from a sample port installed on the effluent PVC pipe using a peristaltic pump. The air was collected in a 1‐liter Tedlar® bag and delivered to TestAmerica under proper COC documentation for analysis of VOCs per EPA Method TO‐18. Results of the air sample indicated a recovery rate of 5.84 lbs/day of TPH is being extracted. Results of the air sample is summarized on Table 8 and the laboratory analytical report is provided in Appendix I.




3. FINDINGS

Based on the initial emergency response interim source removal activities performed by SWS a subcontractor of TEI, follow‐up interim source removal activities performed by Petrotech, and soil and groundwater assessment activities performed by HSW at the Site, the following can be concluded:

Approximately 750 gallons of diesel fuel was released;

Approximately 36.96 tons of diesel impacted soil was removed and disposed of offsite;

Approximately 155 of diesel impacted groundwater, including approximately 100 gallons of product was removed and disposed of offsite;

Three confirmatory soil samples (CS‐1 through CS‐3) collected along the east, south, and west walls did not exceed residential, commercial, or leachability based SCTLs, per Chapter 62‐777 F.A.C., Table II, respectively;

Contaminated soil based on OVA readings greater than 10 ppm, but less than 500 ppm was only observed in one soil boring, MW‐3, at depths of two and three ft. BLS;

Five monitoring wells were installed to determine the vertical and horizontal extent of diesel impacted groundwater, DW‐1 (deep well), MW‐1 (source well/perimeter well to the east), MW‐2 (perimeter well to the north), MW‐3 (perimeter well to the south), and MW‐4 (perimeter well to the west);

Groundwater samples collected from each well indicated that constituents in each well sample were below their respective GCTLs per Chapter 62‐777 F.A.C., Table I;

Groundwater flow direction is generally to the south with components of flow to the west and east, depending on rainy or dry seasons; dry being to the east and rainy to the west, due to influence of hydraulic head in the adjacent storm water retention pond;

Seven MPE wells (MPE‐1 through MPE‐7) were installed directly along the southeast edge of the IT building within the source area to depths ranging from 4.83 ft. BLS to 5.93 ft. BLS;

In conjunction with the installation of the MPE wells, three SSVEL’s (SSVE‐1 through 3) were installed under the southeast corner of the IT Building’s concrete foundation;

Eight drums of diesel impacted soil was generated during installation of the MPE and SSVEL wells and were disposed of off‐Site;

A temporary diesel powered DPE system capable of producing a vacuum of greater than 14 “Hg and 20 scfm per well was installed and operated for approximately 24 days;

Approximately 3, 126 gallons of DIW was extracted from the MPE wells and hauled off‐Site;

An estimated mass of 12.68 lbs of TPH was recovered by the DPE system;

As of June 30, 2017, free product in excess of Chapter 62‐780 F.A.C.’s definition of free product of 0.01‐inches was not observed/recorded in MPE‐1 through MPE‐7;

An overall total of approximately 0.61 gallons of free product was absorbed during the 6/13/17 and 6/20/17 deployment;




A solar powered exhaust fan capable of producing enough power to generate air flow rates of up to 500 cfm was installed on the roof and connected to the three SSVELs; and

Air sampling results from the effluent of the SSES indicated a recovery rate of approximately 5.84 lbs/day of TPH.




4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the findings above, HSW concludes that initial source removal efforts combined with operation of the DPE system were successful in removing the source and reducing the free product within the source area to below 0.01‐inches as of June 30, 2017, satisfying requirements of Chapter 62‐780.500(1) F.A.C. Additionally, HSW concludes that diesel‐impacted groundwater has been delineated both vertically and horizontally in the four cardinal directions based on the June 5, 2017 groundwater sampling analytical data from monitoring wells DW‐1 and MW‐1 through MW‐4 satisfying requirements of Chapter 62‐780.600(1). Although results of the source removal efforts and soil and groundwater assessment data have been favorable, HSW recommends the following:

Continued operation of the SSES with monthly, for one quarter, then quarterly, air sampling from the effluent sample port for laboratory analysis of EPA Method 18 until two consecutive, non‐detect results are obtained;

Free product gauging coupled with installation and removal/disposal of absorbent socks in MPE wells exhibiting presence of residual product, if any, monthly for six months and quarterly thereafter, thru seasonal changes of one year, or until product is no longer apparent, or a different remedy is devised, if necessary; and

Quarterly groundwater monitoring for a minimum of one year to prove residual contaminants are not migrating and are expected to naturally attenuate, followed by determination of closure with controls, or continued long‐term monitoring, or no further action.


HSW Engineering, Inc. ■ www.hsweng.com Engineering and Scientific solutions within your reach…

P:\6CN800101 Tupperware\08 Reports - Submittals - Permits\Site Assessment_JPC\Tupperware IT Bldg_2017 10 09.docx

TABLES

Florida Department of Environmental Protection -- Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems -- Preapproval Program

Facility Name: Tupperware Brands Corporation

Facility Address: 14901 S. Orange Blossom Trail, Orlando, Florida

Facility ID#: 49/8521966

BORING DATE SAMPLE PID

NO. COLLECTED INTERVAL READING ODOR LITHOLOGY (FBLS) (ppm)

1.0 1.4 Sand, fine-grained, light brown, very loose2.0 0.4 Sand, fine-grained, silty, dark gray, very loose3.0 0.1 Sand, fine-grained, light gray, loose4.0 0.7 "5.0 0.3 Sand, fine-grained, light gray w/dark gray stringers6.0 0.4 "8.0 1.6 "

10.0 2.0 Sand, fine-grained, light brown12.0 0.3 "14.0 2.3 "16.0 3.1 "17.0 -- Sand, fine-grained, olive gray, loose, medium dense18.0 2.0 "20.0 1.5 "1.0 See DW-1 boring log for lithological description.

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.01.0 0 Sand, fine-grained, very loose, light brown2.0 0 "3.0 0 Sand, fine-grained, silt, loose, olive gray4.0 0 Sand, fine-grained, loose, olive gray5.0 0 Sand, fine-grained, loose, light gray6.0 0.1 "7.0 0.5 "8.0 0.3 "9.0 0 "

10.0 0 "1.0 1.5 Sand, fine-grained, organic rich, dark gray2.0 67.5 Sand, fine-grained, light gray to dark gray, staining3.0 123.2 "4.0 2.6 "5.0 0.0 "7.0 0.0 "1.0 0 Sand, fine-grained, silty, dark gray, loose2.0 0 "3.0 0 "4.0 0 Sand, fine-grained, dark gray, loose5.0 0 "6.0 0 "8.0 0 "

NOTES:

FBLS = feet below land surfaceppm = parts per million

TABLE1:SOILSCREENINGSUMMARY

MW-1 4/12/2017

MW-2 4/12/2017

DW-1 4/12/2017

MW-3 4/12/2017

MW-4 4/12/2017

Soil & GW Analyticals.xlsx Page 1 of 1 Rev. 8/25/2017



Facility Address: 14901 S. Orange Blossom Trail, Orlando, Floridax


(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg)

Leachability Based on Groundwater Criteria (mg/kg) 0.007 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.09 340Direct Exposure Residential (mg/kg) 1.2 7,500 1,500 130 4,400 460

Boring/ Well No.

Date Collected Net OVA Reading (ppm)

CS-1 2/17/17 NA 0.0010 U 0.00083 U 0.00083 U 0.0017 U 0.0003 U 10.1

CS-2 2/17/17 NA 0.00096 U 0.00078 U 0.00078 U 0.0016 U 0.00078 U 10.5

CS-3 2/17/17 NA 0.0011 U 0.00089 U 0.00089 U 0.0019 U 0.00089 U 9.88

Notes: NA = Not Available.NS = Not Sampled.All results in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), unless otherwise noted * = Leachability value may be determined using SPLP.U = Compound was analyzed for, but not detectedI = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quantitiation limitBold = analyte exceeded the Leachability based SCTL

Laboratory Analyses

TABLE2A:SOILANALYTICALSUMMARY‐VOCs&TRPH

Benzene TolueneEthyl-

benzeneTotal

XylenesMTBE TRPHs






(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg)

Leachability Based on Groundwater Criteria (mg/kg) 1.2 3.1 8.5 2.1 27 2,500 32,000 1,200 160 250 880Direct Exposure Residential (mg/kg) 55 200 210 2,400 1,800 21,000 2,500 3,200 2,600 2,200 2,400

Boring/ Well No.


CS-1 2/17/17 NA 0.029 U 0.029 U 0.029 U 0.029 U 0.029 U 0.018 U 0.0036 U 0.018 U 0.029 U 0.018 U 0.018 U



Notes: NA = Not Available.NS = Not Sampled.U = Compound was analyzed for, but not detectedI = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quantitiation limit

TABLE 2B: SOIL ANALYTICAL SUMMARY - NON-CARCINOGENIC PAHs

Naph-thalene

1-Methyl-naph-

thalene

Fluor-ene

Phenan-threne

Pyrene2-Methyl-

naph-thalene

Acen-aph-

thene

Acen-aph-

thylene

Anthra-cene

Benzo(g,h,i)pery-lene

Fluoran-thene

Laboratory Analyses






(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg)

Leachability Based on Groundwater Criteria (mg/kg) 8 0.8 2.4 24 77 0.7 6.6 **Direct Exposure Residential (mg/kg) 0.1 # # # # # # 0.1

Boring/ Well No.


CS-1 2/17/17 NA 0.0036 U 0.0036 U 0.0036 U 0.0036 U 0.0036 U 0.0036 U 0.0036 U 0.0126 U

CS-2 2/17/17 NA 0.0037 U 0.0037 U 0.0056 I 0.0037 U 0.0037 U 0.0037 U 0.0037 U 0.0047

CS-3 2/17/17 NA 0.0036 U 0.0036 U 0.0036 U 0.0036 U 0.0036 U 0.0036 U 0.0036 U 0.0126 U

Notes: NA = Not Available.NS = Not Sampled.NC = Not Calculated ** = Leachability value not applicable. # = Direct Exposure value not applicable except as part of the Benzo(a)pyrene equivalent. a = Total Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalents calculated as per FDEP conversion table (Revised 11-26-07).U = Compound was analyzed for, but not detectedI = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quantitiation limit

TABLE2C:SOILANALYTICALSUMMARY‐CARCINOGENICPAHs

Benzo(a)

anthra-cene

Benzo(b)

fluoran-thene

Benzo(k)

fluoran-thene

Chry-sene

Dibenz(a,h)

anthra-cene

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)

pyrene

Benzo(a)

pyrene

Laboratory Analyses

Benzo(a)

pyrene equivalent

Soil & GW Analyticals.xlsx Page 1 of 1 Rev.8/25/2017




Top of A/G Riser Screened WellWell No. Date Drilled Installation Casing Length, if Total Well Interval Diameter Lithology of Screen Interval

Method Elevation Applicable Depth (ft) (fbls) (in)

MW-1 4/12/2017 DPT 100.00 N/A 12.00 2-12 1.5 Gray/Brown fine grained sand (SP)MW-2 4/12/2017 DPT 100.11 N/A 12.00 2-12 1.5 Gray/Brown fine grained sand (SP)MW-3 4/12/2017 DPT 99.84 N/A 7.50 2.5-7.5 1.5 Gray/Brown fine grained sand (SP)MW-4 4/12/2017 DPT 99.78 N/A 11.00 1-11 1.5 Gray/Brown fine grained sand (SP)DW-1 4/12/2017 DPT 100.10 N/A 20.00 15-20 1.5 Gray/Brown fine grained sand (SP)

TABLE3:WELLCONSTRUCTIONDETAILS


Facility Name: Tupperware Brands Corporation All Measurements = Feet

Facility Address: 14901 S. Orange Blossom Trail, Orlando, Florida Blank = No Data


Well No. DW-1 MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4Diameter (inches) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5Well Depth 20.00 12.00 12.00 7.50 11.00Screen Interval 15 - 20 2 - 12 2 - 12 2.5 - 7.5 1 - 11TOC Elevation 100.10 100.00 100.11 99.84 99.78

DATE ELEV DTWFP

DepthELEV DTW FP ELEV DTW FP ELEV DTW FP ELEV DTW FP

04/20/2017 - 94.50 5.50 94.67 5.44 94.06 5.78 94.24 5.5406/05/2017 95.49 4.61 95.76 4.24 95.77 4.34 95.78 4.06 95.14 4.64

TABLE4:GROUNDWATERELEVATIONSUMMARY

Soil & GW Analyticals.xlsx Page 1 of 1Rev 8/25/2017





See notes at end of table.

BenzeneEthyl-

benzeneMTBE Toluene

TotalXylenes

TotalVOAs

EDBTotal

ArsenicTotal

BariumTotal

CadmiumTotal

ChromiumTotalLead

Selenium Silver Mercury

Location Date (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L)

1 30 20 40 20 -- 0.02 10** 5** 100** 15

100 300 200 400 200 --

NS NS NS NS NS -- NS 120 U 46 I 18 U 50 U 40 U 150 U 50 U 0.50 U

6/5/2017 0.50 U 0.44 U 0.44 U 0.51 U 2.3 I 2.3 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

6/5/2017 0.50 U 0.44 U 0.51 U 1.45 U 0.01 U NS NS NS NS 2.2 U NS NS NS

6/5/2017 0.50 U 0.44 U 0.44 U 0.51 U 0.50 U 1.89 U NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS



Notes: Blank = No DataNA = Not Available.NS = Not Sampled.

GCTLs = Groundwater Cleanup Target Levels specified in Table I of Chapter 62-777, F.A.C. (NADCs = Natural Attenuation Default Source Concentrations specified in Table V of Chapter 62-777, F.A.C. ** = As provided in Chapter 62-550, F.A.C.I = Indicates a result greater than or equal to method detection limit but less than practical quanitation limit.U = Indicates a result less than method detection limit.Bold indicates exceedance of GCTLs. Shaded box indicates exceedance of NADCs

TABLE5A:GROUNDWATERMONITORINGWELLANALYTICALSUMMARY‐VOCs,EDB,&8RCRAMetals

MW-4

MW-1

MW-2

MW-3

Sample

DW-1

GCTLNADC

Drum Disposal






5,000 28 28 20 210 2100 0.05 0.2 0.05 210 0.5 4.8 0.005 280 280 0.05 14 210 21050,000 280 280 200 2,100 21,000 5 20 5 21,000 50 480 0.5 2,800 2,800 5 140 2,100 2,100

Location Date (mg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L)

2/14/2017 0.10 U 0.047 U 0.044 U 0.037 U 0.036 U 0.036 U 0.037 U 0.043 U 0.2 0.040 U 0.046 U 0.051 U 0.026 U 0.051 U 0.038 U 0.037 U 0.035 U 0.039 U 0.048 U

6/5/2017 0.16 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.045 U 0.22 U 0.045 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.032 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.045 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U

6/5/2017 0.20 I 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.045 U 0.22 U 0.045 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.032 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.045 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U

6/5/2017 0.16 U 0.22 U 0.22 I 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.045 U 0.22 U 0.045 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.032 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.045 U 0.37 I 0.22 U 0.22 U

6/5/2017 0.16 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 I 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.045 U 0.22 U 0.045 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.032 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.045 U 2.1 V 0.22 U 0.22 U

6/5/2017 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.045 U 0.22 U 0.045 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.032 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.045 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U

Notes: NA = Not Available. NS = Not Sampled.

GCTLs = Groundwater Cleanup Target Levels specified in Table I of Chapter 62-777, F.A.C.NADCs = Natural Attenuation Default Source Concentrations specified in Table V of Chapter 62-777, F.A.C. ** = As provided in Chapter 62-550, F.A.C.I = Indicates a result greater than or equal to method detection limit but less than practical quanitation limit.U = Indicates a result less than method detection limit.

Bold indicates exceedance of GCTLs. Shaded box indicates exceedance of NADCs

DW-1

Pond #1

NADCs

GCTLs

MW-1

MW-2

MW-3

MW-4

TABLE5B:SURFICIALGROUNDWATERANALYTICALSUMMARY‐PAHsandTRPH

Fluorene

Indeno[1,2,3-

cd]pyrene

Naphthalene

Benzo[g,h,i]peryle

ne

Benzo[k]fluoranthe

neChrysene

Dibenz(a,h)anthrac

ene

Phenanthrene

2-Methylnaphthalene

PyreneBenzo[a]anthrace

neSample TRPHs

1-Methylnaphthalene

V = Indicates that the analyte was detected at or above the method detection limit in both the sample and the associated method blank and the value of 10 times the blank value was equal to or greater than the associated sample value.

Benzo[a]pyrene

Acenaphthylene

Anthracene

Fluoranthene

Acenaphthene

Benzo[b]fluoranthe

ne






BenzeneEthyl-

benzeneMTBE Toluene

TotalXylenes

TotalVOAs

Location Date (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L)

1 30 20 40 20 --

100 300 200 400 200 --

2/14/2017 0.71 U 0.69 U 0.60 U 0.80 I 1.3 U 0.8

Notes:

SW CTLs = Surface Water Cleanup Target Levels specified in Table I of Chapter 62-777, F.A.C.NADCs = Natural Attenuation Default Source Concentrations specified in Table V of Chapter 62-777, F.A.C.I = Indicates a result greater than or equal to method detection limit but less than practical quanitation limit.U = Indicates a result less than method detection limit.

TABLE5C:SURFACEWATERANALYTICALSUMMARY‐VOCs

Sample

SW CTLNADC

Pond #1





Sample Sample Sample Estimated

Cumulative

Mass

Recovered

I.D. Date Time Air Flow (scfm) Unfiltered Filtered Net Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes Total BTEX MTBE TPH (lb/hr) (lb/day) (lbs)

Pre-Carbon-Startup 4/13/2017 5:20 PM 150 - - - 1.0 U 3.0 2.2 15.8 21.0 1.0 U 430 0.24 5.80 5.80

Post Carbon-Startup 4/13/2017 5:30 PM 150 - - - 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 3.0 U 0.0 1.0 U 10 0.01 0.13

Pre-Carbon-Week 1 4/20/2017 8:35 AM 150 - - - 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 3.0 U 0.0 1.0 U 59 0.03 0.80 11.07

Post Carbon-Week 1 4/20/2017 8:40 AM 150 - - - 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 3.0 U 0.0 1.0 U 10 0.01 0.13

Pre-Carbon-Week 2 4/27/2017 8:45 AM 160 - - - 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 3.0 U 0.0 1.0 U 16 0.01 0.23 12.68

Post Carbon-Week 2 4/27/2017 8:55 AM 160 - - - 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 3.0 U 0.0 1.0 U 10 0.01 0.14

Exhaust Fan-1 6/30/2017 10:50 AM 500 - - - 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.3 1.3 NS 260 0.2 5.84

- - -

Notes:

Total BTEX - Sum of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenesMTBE - methyl tert-butyl etherTPH - total petroleum hydrocarbons via US EPA Method TO3scfm - standard cubic feet per minute

TABLE6:AIRSAMPLEANALYTICALSUMMARY

OVA Reading (ppm) Hydrocarbon Concentrations (mg/m3) TPH Emissions

Z:\6CN800101 Tupperware\08 Reports - Submittals - Permits\Site Assessment_JPC\Tables\Soil & GW Analyticals.xlsx rev. 8/25/2017


Facility Name: Tupperware Brands Corporation All Measurements = Feet

Facility Address: 14901 S. Orange Blossom Trail, Orlando, Florida Blank = No Data


E PRODUCT MEASUREMENT SUMMARY

Well No. MPE-1 MPE-2 MPE-3 MPE-4Diameter (inches) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00Well Depth (ft BLS) 5.87 5.37 5.06 4.83Screen Length (ft) 5 5 5 4.83

DATE DTW DTPFP

Thickness (ft)

DTW DTPFP

Thickness (ft)

DTW DTPFP

Thickness (ft)

DTW DTPFP

Thickness (ft)

4/14/2017 5.89 5.45 0.44 5.03 5.02 0.01 4.52 4.51 0.01 4.41 NP 04/20/2017 5.60 -- 0.00 5.24 5.22 0.02 4.72 -- 0.00 4.36 4.20 0.165/9/2017 Dry @ 5.87 (TD) Dry @ 5.37 (TD) Dry @ 5.06 (TD) Dry @ 4.83 (TD)6/5/2017 4.14 -- 0.00 4.02 -- 0.00 5.02 -- 0.00 3.12 2.99 0.136/13/2017 3.09 -- 0.00 2.68 -- 0.00 2.20 -- 0.00 1.69 -- 0.006/20/2017 2.19 -- 0.00 1.82 1.81 0.01 1.34 1.33 0.01 0.85 -- 0.006/30/2017 1.65 -- 0.00 1.72 -- 0.00 1.43 -- 0.00 0.90 -- 0.00

Well No. MPE-5 MPE-6 MPE-7 TankDiameter (inches) 2.00 2.00 2.00Well Depth 5.55 5.93Screen Length 5 5 5

DATE DTW DTPFP

Thickness (ft)

DTW DTPFP

Thickness (ft)

DTW DTPFP

Thickness (ft)

DTW DTPFP

Thickness (ft)

4/14/2017 5.20 4.62 0.58 4.75 -- -- 4.73 -- --

4/20/2017 4.72 -- 0.00 5.65 5.2 0.45 5.25 5.1 0.15 4.59

5/9/2017 5.47 -- 0.00 5.91 -- 0.00 5.79 5.75 0.046/5/2017 3.45 -- 0.00 3.72 -- 0.00 3.68 -- 0.006/13/2017 2.20 -- 0.00 2.49 -- 0.00 2.45 2.43 0.026/20/2017 1.30 -- 0.00 1.59 -- 0.00 1.56 1.55 0.016/30/2017 1.43 -- 0.00 1.93 -- 0.00 2.28 -- 0.00

Notes: FP = Free ProductNP = No ProductDTP = Depth to productDTW = Depth to waterft = feetft BLS = feet below land surface

TABLE7:FREEPRODUCTMEASUREMENTSUMMARY

Visible product but not enough to measure

Z:\6CN800101 Tupperware\08 Reports - Submittals - Permits\Site Assessment_JPC\Tables\Soil & GW Analyticals.xlsx\RW Product Page 1 of 1

Rev 8/25/2017





Well No.Diameter (inches) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00

Well Depth 5.87 5.37 5.06 4.83

Screen Interval 5 5 5 4.83

DATEThickness (Inches)

Thickness (Inches)

Thickness (Inches)

Thickness (Inches)

06/13/2017 7.00 2.00 9.00 17.0006/30/2017 7.00 4.00 4.00 8.00

Well No.Diameter (inches)Well DepthScreen Interval

DATEThickness (Inches)

Thickness (Inches)

Thickness (Inches)

06/13/2017 1.00 0.50 7.0006/30/2017 0.00 0.00 3.00

MPE-2 MPE-3

Volume (gallons)

0.050.05

Volume (gallons)

0.010.03

0.300.31

TABLE8:ABSORBENTSOCKPRODUCTTHICKNESSSUMMARY

0.05

Volume (gallons)

0.060.03

Volume (gallons)

0.120.06

MPE-4

MPE-5 MPE-6 MPE-7

Volume Absorbed(gallons)

MPE-1

2.0 2.0 2.05.55 5.93

5 5 5

0.00 0.00 0.150.01 0.00

Volume (gallons) Volume (gallons) Volume (gallons)

Soil & GW Analyticals.xlsx Page 1 of 1Rev 8/25/2017




FIGURES

Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GISUser Community

.0 450225

Ft

Tupperware Brand CorporationSouth Orange Blossom Trail

Orlando, Florida

FIGURE 1Aerial Map

LEGENDApproximate Site Location (IT Building)

Approximate Property Boundary

N O

range Blossom

Trail

Mary Louis LN

Profile View

IT Building

5' of 4" Ø0.010" SlottedPVC Screen

36"x36"x12"Wood Plenumtilted 18° fromHorizontal

4" Ø PVCVertical Riserto Roof AlongExterior Wall

Exhaust FanSolar Panel

IT Building Footing

Compacted Backfill

1/8" SS cableattached to heavySS gutter system

1/8" SS cableattached to heavysteel diesel tankbracket

Plan View

24" Ø Fan

36"x36"x12"Wood Plenumtilted 18° fromHorizontal

4" Ø PVC Riser

IT Building Roof

Solar Panel1/8" SS cableattached to heavySS gutter system

1/8" SS cableattached to heavysteel diesel tankbracket

SSVEL-1

SSVEL-2

SSVEL-3 Plan View

IT Building

8'

7'

6'

4" Ø PVC Cap

4" Ø PVCVertical Riser to Roof

45°

BuildingExterior

Z:\6

CN

8001

01 T

uppe

rwar

e\11

CAD

D\V

apor

Miti

gatio

n Sy

stem

.dw

g |

LAST

SAV

ED B

Y:N

BAR

NES

Tupperware Brand CorporationSouth Orange Blossom Trail

Orlando, Florida

FIGURE 6

Sub-Slab Vapor Exhaust System Details

FEET

0 1 2

Approximate Scale

FEET

0 1.5 3

Approximate Scale

FEET

0 1.25 2.5

Approximate Scale

LEGENDSSVEP - Sub-Slab Vapor

Extraction Lateral




APPENDIX A FDEP Storage Tank Facility Discharge Site Inspection Report

and SWS Incident Report

Florida Department of Environmental ProtectionTwin Towers Office Bldg. 2600 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida, 32399-2400

Division of Waste ManagementPetroleum Storage Systems

Storage Tank Facility Discharge Site Inspection Report

Facility Information:8521966C - Fuel user/Non-retailTUPPERWARE CORP3175 N ORANGE BLOSSOM TRLKISSIMMEE, FL 34744-113728° 20' 41.6436''81° 23' 48.5339''DPHO

County: OSCEOLA Inspection Date: 02/13/2017

# of Inspected ASTs: 1USTs: 0

Mineral Acid Tanks: 0

Facility ID:Facility Type:Facility Name:

Latitude:Longitude:LL Method:

Inspection Result:Result: In Compliance

Also Performed:

INSURANCE

ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

Financial Responsibility:

Financial Responsibility:

Insurance Carrier:

Effective Date: Expiration Date:07/27/2016 07/27/2017

Findings:

Signatures:

TKOREP - ORANGE CNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION

Storage Tank Program Office

(407) 836-1499

Storage Tank Program Office Phone Number

Activity Opened 02/13/2017 Glen BeckerPage 1 of 4

Facility ID: 8521966

Glen Becker Kim Bauman

INSPECTOR NAME REPRESENTATIVE NAME

REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATUREINSPECTOR SIGNATURE

Owners of UST facilities are reminded that the Federal Energy Policy Act of 2005 and 40 CFR 280 SubpartJ, requires Operator Training at all facilities by October 15, 2018. For further information please visit:http://www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/categories/tanks/pages/op_train.htm

System Tests

DateCompleted

Results Reviewed Next Due CommentDate

Completed Tests

Type

Annual Operability 04/06/2016 Passed 04/06/2016 04/06/2017

02/13/2017

Inspection performed after receipt of notice from the State Watch Office that a diesel spill of 750gallons occurred that impacted groundwater on February 10, 2017.According to facility personnel, the diesel release occurred due to a failure of the generator daytank fill level device. The device failed which kept the 1,000-gal diesel AST pumping fuel to theday tank which subsequently released the diesel fuel. The fuel released from the day tank througha vent pipe to the outside of the generator room.Triumvirate Environmental and SWS responded to the spill to initiate remediation actions. Soil andgroundwater impacts were observed on the south side of the generator room. No surface watersappear to have been impacted.

Site Visit Comments

Inspection Comments

02/13/2017

A FDEP Discharge Report Form (DRF) was received by OCEPD via email on February 13, 2017.Please provide to OCEPD all documentation relating to the discharge including waste/soil/waterremoval and disposal work orders and manifests, and work orders for the repair to the Day Tank



level switch mechanism.

Also, please maintain the coating on the 1,000-gal generator AST's fill port containment as corrosionis starting to occur.

Please send all documentation to Glen Becker, OCEPD: [email protected], 321-689-8389.

Inspection Photos

02/13/2017

1K-gal DW AST involved with discharge

Added Date 02/13/2017

Diesel spill impacted area adjacent to generatorroom

Added Date

02/13/2017

Diesel spill impacted area adjacent to generatorroom

Added Date 02/13/2017

Vent where diesel fuel released from

Added Date



02/13/2017

Fill port spill containment-corrosion forming

Added Date





APPENDIX B Soil Boring Logs with Equipment Calibration Logs and Well Completion Logs and Permits




APPENDIX C Groundwater Sampling Logs with Equipment Calibration Logs




APPENDIX D Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Report

ANALYTICAL REPORTTestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.TestAmerica Tampa6712 Benjamin RoadSuite 100Tampa, FL 33634Tel: (813)885-7427

TestAmerica Job ID: 660-81098-1Client Project/Site: Tupperware

For:HSW Engineering, Inc.605 E. Robinson St.Suite 308Orlando, Florida 32801

Attn: Andrew Lawn

Authorized for release by:6/14/2017 8:13:48 AM

Matt Jones, Project Manager I(850)[email protected]

The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNI requirements for accreditedparameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full,and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Managerat the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page.

This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature isintended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.

Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

https://secure.testamericainc.com/TotalAccess/login.aspx

http://www.testamericainc.com/AskTheExpert/Expert_index.htm

http://www.testamericainc.com

mailto:[email protected]

Table of Contents

Client: HSW Engineering, Inc.Project/Site: Tupperware

TestAmerica Job ID: 660-81098-1

Page 2 of 32TestAmerica Tampa

6/14/2017

Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Definitions/Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

Detection Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

QC Association Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

Field Data Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

Receipt Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Sample SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 660-81098-1Client: HSW Engineering, Inc.

Project/Site: Tupperware

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix

660-81098-1 DW-1 Water 06/05/17 11:00 06/07/17 09:00

660-81098-2 MW-1 Water 06/05/17 12:21 06/07/17 09:00

660-81098-3 MW-2 Water 06/05/17 13:06 06/07/17 09:00

660-81098-4 MW-3 Water 06/05/17 13:54 06/07/17 09:00

660-81098-5 MW-4 Water 06/05/17 14:42 06/07/17 09:00

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 3 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Case NarrativeClient: HSW Engineering, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 660-81098-1Project/Site: Tupperware

Job ID: 660-81098-1

Laboratory: TestAmerica Tampa

Narrative

Job Narrative

660-81098-1

Comments

No additional comments.

Receipt

The samples were received on 6/7/2017 9:00 AM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice. The temperatures of the 2 coolers at receipt time were 0.9º C and 1.9º C.

GC/MS VOA

No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.

GC/MS Semi VOA Method(s) 8270D SIM: The method blank (MB) associated with batch 660-183770 contained Naphthalene and Phenanthrene above the

method detection limit. These target analyte concentrations were less than the practical quantitation limit (PQL); therefore, re-extraction and/or re-analysis of samples was not performed. The associated sample detections for Naphthalene and Phenanthrene within 10 times the amount in the MB were qualified with a "V".

No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page.

GC Semi VOA Method(s) FL-PRO: Two surrogates are used for this analysis. The laboratory's SOP allows one of these surrogates to be outside acceptance criteria without performing re-extraction/re-analysis. The following samples contained an allowable number of surrogate

compounds outside limits: DW-1 (660-81098-1), MW-2 (660-81098-3), MW-3 (660-81098-4), MW-4 (660-81098-5), (LCS 660-183777/2-A), (LCSD 660-183777/3-A), (MB 660-183777/1-A) and (680-139576-B-1-A). These results have been reported and qualified.


Metals No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.

Organic Prep No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.

TestAmerica TampaPage 4 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Definitions/GlossaryTestAmerica Job ID: 660-81098-1Client: HSW Engineering, Inc.


Qualifiers

GC/MS VOA

Qualifier Description

U Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected.

Qualifier

I The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quantitation limit.

J3 Estimated value; value may not be accurate. Spike recovery or RPD outside of criteria.

GC/MS Semi VOA



Qualifier


V Indicates that the analyte was detected at or above the method detection limit in both the sample and the associated method blank and the

value of 10 times the blank value was equal to or greater than the associated sample value.

GC Semi VOA


J1 Estimated value; value may not be accurate. Surrogate recovery outside of criteria.

Qualifier



Metals



Qualifier

Glossary

These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.

¤ Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis

Abbreviation

%R Percent Recovery

CFL Contains Free Liquid

CNF Contains No Free Liquid

DER Duplicate Error Ratio (normalized absolute difference)

Dil Fac Dilution Factor

DL Detection Limit (DoD/DOE)

DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample

DLC Decision Level Concentration (Radiochemistry)

EDL Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin)

LOD Limit of Detection (DoD/DOE)

LOQ Limit of Quantitation (DoD/DOE)

MDA Minimum Detectable Activity (Radiochemistry)

MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry)

MDL Method Detection Limit

ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)

NC Not Calculated

ND Not Detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)

PQL Practical Quantitation Limit

QC Quality Control

RER Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry)

RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)

RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points

TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)

TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 5 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 660-81098-1Client: HSW Engineering, Inc.


Client Sample ID: DW-1 Lab Sample ID: 660-81098-1

m-Xylene & p-Xylene

PQL

2.0 ug/L

MDL

0.60

Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type

Total/NA1I1.7 8260B

o-Xylene 1.0 ug/L0.50 Total/NA10.55 I 8260B

Xylenes, Total 3.0 ug/L0.50 Total/NA12.3 I 8260B

Client Sample ID: MW-1 Lab Sample ID: 660-81098-2

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

(C8-C40)

PQL

0.94 mg/L

MDL

0.16


Total/NA1I0.20 FL-PRO


2-Methylnaphthalene

PQL

0.45 ug/L

MDL

0.22


Total/NA1I0.22 8270D SIM

Naphthalene 0.45 ug/L0.22 Total/NA10.37 I 8270D SIM


Acenaphthene

PQL

0.45 ug/L

MDL

0.22


Total/NA1I0.22 8270D SIM

Naphthalene 0.45 ug/L0.22 Total/NA12.1 V 8270D SIM


No Detections.

TestAmerica Tampa

This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.

Page 6 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 660-81098-1Client: HSW Engineering, Inc.


Lab Sample ID: 660-81098-1Client Sample ID: DW-1Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 06/05/17 11:00

Date Received: 06/07/17 09:00

Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)PQL MDL

Benzene 0.50 U 1.0 0.50 ug/L 06/10/17 13:32 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

1.0 0.44 ug/L 06/10/17 13:32 1Ethylbenzene 0.44 U

1.0 0.44 ug/L 06/10/17 13:32 1Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.44 U

2.0 0.60 ug/L 06/10/17 13:32 1m-Xylene & p-Xylene 1.7 I

1.0 0.50 ug/L 06/10/17 13:32 1o-Xylene 0.55 I

1.0 0.51 ug/L 06/10/17 13:32 1Toluene 0.51 U

3.0 0.50 ug/L 06/10/17 13:32 1Xylenes, Total 2.3 I

4-Bromofluorobenzene 106 70 - 130 06/10/17 13:32 1

Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery

Dibromofluoromethane 102 06/10/17 13:32 170 - 130

Toluene-d8 (Surr) 97 06/10/17 13:32 170 - 130

Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM)PQL MDL

Acenaphthene 0.22 U 0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 1


0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 1Acenaphthylene 0.22 U

0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 1Anthracene 0.22 U

0.45 0.045 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 1Benzo[a]anthracene 0.045 U

0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 1Benzo[a]pyrene 0.22 U

0.45 0.045 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.045 U

0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.22 U

0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.22 U

0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 1Chrysene 0.22 U

0.45 0.032 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.032 U

0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 1Fluoranthene 0.22 U

0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 1Fluorene 0.22 U

0.45 0.045 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.045 U

0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 11-Methylnaphthalene 0.22 U


0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 1Naphthalene 0.22 U

0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 1Phenanthrene 0.22 U

0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 1Pyrene 0.22 U

Fluoranthene-d10 48 35 - 140 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 1


2-methylnaphthalene-d10 50 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:11 119 - 110

Method: FL-PRO - Florida - Petroleum Range Organics (GC)PQL MDL


(C8-C40)

0.16 U 0.95 0.16 mg/L 06/09/17 07:55 06/09/17 23:05 1


o-Terphenyl 47 J1 82 - 142 06/09/17 07:55 06/09/17 23:05 1


n-C39 57 06/09/17 07:55 06/09/17 23:05 142 - 193

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 7 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15



Lab Sample ID: 660-81098-2Client Sample ID: MW-1Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 06/05/17 12:21



Acrolein 3.8 U 5.0 3.8 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1


10 4.5 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1Acrylonitrile 4.5 U

1.0 0.50 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1Benzene 0.50 U

1.0 0.63 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1Bromoform 0.63 U

1.0 0.43 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1Carbon tetrachloride 0.43 U

1.0 0.63 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1Chlorobenzene 0.63 U

1.0 0.31 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1Chlorodibromomethane 0.31 U

5.0 2.5 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1Chloroethane 2.5 U

5.0 0.95 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 12-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 0.95 U

1.0 0.90 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1Chloroform 0.90 U

1.0 0.44 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1Dichlorobromomethane 0.44 U

1.0 0.52 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 11,1-Dichloroethane 0.52 U

1.0 0.57 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 11,2-Dichloroethane 0.57 J3 U

1.0 0.67 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 11,1-Dichloroethene 0.67 U

1.0 0.52 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 11,2-Dichloropropane 0.52 U

1.0 0.39 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.39 J3 U

1.0 0.27 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.27 U


5.0 2.5 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1Bromomethane 2.5 U

4.0 1.0 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1Chloromethane 1.0 U

10 5.0 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1Methylene Chloride 5.0 J3 U

1.0 0.17 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.17 U

1.0 0.50 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1Tetrachloroethene 0.50 U

1.0 0.51 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1Toluene 0.51 U

1.0 0.67 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.67 U

1.0 0.47 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 11,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.47 U

1.0 0.47 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 11,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.47 U

1.0 0.61 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1Trichloroethene 0.61 U

1.0 0.71 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 1Vinyl chloride 0.71 U

1.0 0.58 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.58 U

1.0 0.65 ug/L 06/10/17 13:10 11,1-Dichloropropene 0.65 U




Toluene-d8 (Surr) 100 06/10/17 13:10 170 - 130





0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:31 1Anthracene 0.22 U






0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:31 1Chrysene 0.22 U



TestAmerica Tampa

Page 8 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15





Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM) (Continued)PQL MDL

Fluorene 0.22 U 0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:31 1







0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:31 1Pyrene 0.22 U

Fluoranthene-d10 68 35 - 140 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:31 1



Method: 8011 - EDB, DBCP, and 1,2,3-TCP (GC)PQL MDL

Ethylene Dibromide 0.010 U 0.020 0.010 ug/L 06/12/17 15:21 06/13/17 10:28 1


1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 110 70 - 130 06/12/17 15:21 06/13/17 10:28 1




(C8-C40)

0.20 I 0.94 0.16 mg/L 06/09/17 07:55 06/09/17 23:25 1


o-Terphenyl 84 82 - 142 06/09/17 07:55 06/09/17 23:25 1


n-C39 87 06/09/17 07:55 06/09/17 23:25 142 - 193

Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total RecoverablePQL MDL

Lead 0.0022 U 0.010 0.0022 mg/L 06/08/17 07:14 06/08/17 13:12 1


TestAmerica Tampa

Page 9 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15






Benzene 0.50 U 1.0 0.50 ug/L 06/10/17 15:03 1




2.0 0.60 ug/L 06/10/17 15:03 1m-Xylene & p-Xylene 0.60 U

1.0 0.50 ug/L 06/10/17 15:03 1o-Xylene 0.50 U

1.0 0.51 ug/L 06/10/17 15:03 1Toluene 0.51 U

3.0 0.50 ug/L 06/10/17 15:03 1Xylenes, Total 0.50 U




Toluene-d8 (Surr) 99 06/10/17 15:03 170 - 130





0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 09:31 1Anthracene 0.22 U






0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 09:31 1Chrysene 0.22 U



0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 09:31 1Fluorene 0.22 U



0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 09:31 12-Methylnaphthalene 0.22 I

0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 09:31 1Naphthalene 0.37 I


0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 09:31 1Pyrene 0.22 U

Fluoranthene-d10 70 35 - 140 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 09:31 1





(C8-C40)

0.16 U 0.95 0.16 mg/L 06/09/17 07:55 06/09/17 23:46 1


o-Terphenyl 74 J1 82 - 142 06/09/17 07:55 06/09/17 23:46 1


n-C39 83 06/09/17 07:55 06/09/17 23:46 142 - 193

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 10 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15






Benzene 0.50 U 1.0 0.50 ug/L 06/10/17 15:25 1





1.0 0.50 ug/L 06/10/17 15:25 1o-Xylene 0.50 U

1.0 0.51 ug/L 06/10/17 15:25 1Toluene 0.51 U





Toluene-d8 (Surr) 100 06/10/17 15:25 170 - 130


Acenaphthene 0.22 I 0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 09:51 1



0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 09:51 1Anthracene 0.22 U






0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 09:51 1Chrysene 0.22 U



0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 09:51 1Fluorene 0.22 U




0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 09:51 1Naphthalene 2.1 V


0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 09:51 1Pyrene 0.22 U

Fluoranthene-d10 86 35 - 140 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 09:51 1





(C8-C40)

0.16 U 0.94 0.16 mg/L 06/09/17 07:55 06/10/17 00:06 1


o-Terphenyl 74 J1 82 - 142 06/09/17 07:55 06/10/17 00:06 1


n-C39 84 06/09/17 07:55 06/10/17 00:06 142 - 193

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 11 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15






Benzene 0.50 U 1.0 0.50 ug/L 06/10/17 15:47 1





1.0 0.50 ug/L 06/10/17 15:47 1o-Xylene 0.50 U

1.0 0.51 ug/L 06/10/17 15:47 1Toluene 0.51 U





Toluene-d8 (Surr) 99 06/10/17 15:47 170 - 130





0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:51 1Anthracene 0.22 U






0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:51 1Chrysene 0.22 U



0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:51 1Fluorene 0.22 U






0.45 0.22 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:51 1Pyrene 0.22 U

Fluoranthene-d10 87 35 - 140 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 10:51 1





(C8-C40)

0.22 U 1.3 0.22 mg/L 06/09/17 07:55 06/10/17 00:26 1


o-Terphenyl 57 J1 82 - 142 06/09/17 07:55 06/10/17 00:26 1


n-C39 60 06/09/17 07:55 06/10/17 00:26 142 - 193

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 12 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 660-81098-1Client: HSW Engineering, Inc.


Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)

Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 660-183822/7

Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA

Analysis Batch: 183822

PQL MDL

Acrolein 3.8 U 5.0 3.8 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1

MB MB

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier

4.5 U 4.510 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Acrylonitrile

0.50 U 0.501.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Benzene

0.63 U 0.631.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Bromoform

0.43 U 0.431.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Carbon tetrachloride

0.44 U 0.441.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Methyl tert-butyl ether

0.63 U 0.631.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Chlorobenzene

0.60 U 0.602.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1m-Xylene & p-Xylene

0.31 U 0.311.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Chlorodibromomethane

0.50 U 0.501.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1o-Xylene

2.5 U 2.55.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Chloroethane

0.95 U 0.955.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 12-Chloroethyl vinyl ether

0.90 U 0.901.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Chloroform

0.50 U 0.503.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Xylenes, Total

0.44 U 0.441.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Dichlorobromomethane

0.52 U 0.521.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 11,1-Dichloroethane

0.57 U 0.571.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 11,2-Dichloroethane

0.67 U 0.671.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 11,1-Dichloroethene

0.52 U 0.521.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 11,2-Dichloropropane

0.39 U 0.391.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

0.27 U 0.271.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

0.44 U 0.441.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Ethylbenzene

2.5 U 2.55.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Bromomethane

1.0 U 1.04.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Chloromethane

5.0 U 5.010 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Methylene Chloride

0.17 U 0.171.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

0.50 U 0.501.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Tetrachloroethene

0.51 U 0.511.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Toluene

0.67 U 0.671.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene

0.47 U 0.471.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 11,1,1-Trichloroethane

0.47 U 0.471.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 11,1,2-Trichloroethane

0.61 U 0.611.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Trichloroethene

0.71 U 0.711.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 1Vinyl chloride

0.58 U 0.581.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

0.65 U 0.651.0 ug/L 06/10/17 12:41 11,1-Dichloropropene


MB MB

Surrogate Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery

104 06/10/17 12:41 1Dibromofluoromethane 70 - 130

100 06/10/17 12:41 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 70 - 130

Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 660-183822/4



Acrolein 50.0 52.4 ug/L 105 26 - 150

Analyte

LCS LCS

DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec

Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Acrylonitrile 100 99.1 ug/L 99 68 - 131

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 13 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15



Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)




Benzene 10.0 11.1 ug/L 111 71 - 131

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Bromoform 10.0 9.28 ug/L 93 68 - 130

Carbon tetrachloride 10.0 9.86 ug/L 99 70 - 134

Methyl tert-butyl ether 10.0 12.2 ug/L 122 67 - 130

Chlorobenzene 10.0 11.2 ug/L 112 71 - 121

m-Xylene & p-Xylene 10.0 10.8 ug/L 108 71 - 131

Chlorodibromomethane 10.0 9.72 ug/L 97 58 - 130

o-Xylene 10.0 9.65 ug/L 96 69 - 130

Chloroethane 10.0 9.63 ug/L 96 46 - 150

2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 20.0 20.2 ug/L 101 42 - 132

Chloroform 10.0 11.1 ug/L 111 73 - 133

Dichlorobromomethane 10.0 10.7 ug/L 107 70 - 131

1,1-Dichloroethane 10.0 10.9 ug/L 109 72 - 130

1,2-Dichloroethane 10.0 10.1 ug/L 101 71 - 131

1,1-Dichloroethene 10.0 11.2 ug/L 112 56 - 141

1,2-Dichloropropane 10.0 11.3 ug/L 113 72 - 132

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10.0 8.45 ug/L 84 68 - 130

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10.0 8.15 ug/L 82 57 - 130

Ethylbenzene 10.0 12.0 ug/L 120 71 - 131

Bromomethane 10.0 11.4 ug/L 114 10 - 150

Chloromethane 10.0 9.72 ug/L 97 52 - 150

Methylene Chloride 10.0 10.4 ug/L 104 68 - 142

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 10.0 10.3 ug/L 103 67 - 130

Tetrachloroethene 10.0 9.62 ug/L 96 66 - 143

Toluene 10.0 11.0 ug/L 110 72 - 132

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 10.0 11.6 ug/L 116 74 - 139

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 10.0 10.0 ug/L 100 69 - 132

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 10.0 10.1 ug/L 101 70 - 130

Trichloroethene 10.0 11.0 ug/L 110 74 - 139

Vinyl chloride 10.0 10.0 ug/L 100 59 - 147

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10.0 10.9 ug/L 109 73 - 133

1,1-Dichloropropene 10.0 9.93 ug/L 99 70 - 136

4-Bromofluorobenzene 70 - 130

Surrogate

100

LCS LCS

Qualifier Limits%Recovery

95Dibromofluoromethane 70 - 130

97Toluene-d8 (Surr) 70 - 130

Client Sample ID: MW-1Lab Sample ID: 660-81098-2 MS



Acrolein 3.8 U 50.0 51.4 ug/L 103 26 - 150

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

Acrylonitrile 4.5 U 100 74.9 ug/L 75 68 - 131

Benzene 0.50 U 10.0 8.50 ug/L 85 71 - 131

Bromoform 0.63 U 10.0 7.42 ug/L 74 68 - 130

Carbon tetrachloride 0.43 U 10.0 7.36 ug/L 74 70 - 134

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 14 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15




Client Sample ID: MW-1Lab Sample ID: 660-81098-2 MS



Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.44 U 10.0 8.04 ug/L 80 67 - 130

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

Chlorobenzene 0.63 U 10.0 8.40 ug/L 84 71 - 121

m-Xylene & p-Xylene 0.60 U 10.0 8.17 ug/L 82 71 - 131

Chlorodibromomethane 0.31 U 10.0 7.85 ug/L 78 58 - 130

o-Xylene 0.50 U 10.0 6.94 ug/L 69 69 - 130

Chloroethane 2.5 U 10.0 7.89 ug/L 79 46 - 150

2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 0.95 U 20.0 13.9 ug/L 69 42 - 132

Chloroform 0.90 U 10.0 8.72 ug/L 87 73 - 133

Dichlorobromomethane 0.44 U 10.0 8.17 ug/L 82 70 - 131

1,1-Dichloroethane 0.52 U 10.0 8.43 ug/L 84 72 - 130

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.57 U J3 10.0 6.83 J3 ug/L 68 71 - 131

1,1-Dichloroethene 0.67 U 10.0 8.76 ug/L 88 56 - 141

1,2-Dichloropropane 0.52 U 10.0 8.64 ug/L 86 72 - 132

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.39 U J3 10.0 6.67 J3 ug/L 67 68 - 130

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.27 U 10.0 5.99 ug/L 60 57 - 130

Ethylbenzene 0.44 U 10.0 8.60 ug/L 86 71 - 131

Bromomethane 2.5 U 10.0 9.13 ug/L 91 10 - 150

Chloromethane 1.0 U 10.0 7.46 ug/L 75 52 - 150

Methylene Chloride 5.0 U J3 10.0 6.39 I J3 ug/L 64 68 - 142

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.17 U 10.0 7.91 ug/L 79 67 - 130

Tetrachloroethene 0.50 U 10.0 7.71 ug/L 77 66 - 143

Toluene 0.51 U 10.0 8.52 ug/L 85 72 - 132

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.67 U 10.0 8.48 ug/L 85 74 - 139

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.47 U 10.0 7.41 ug/L 74 69 - 132

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.47 U 10.0 8.33 ug/L 83 70 - 130

Trichloroethene 0.61 U 10.0 8.68 ug/L 87 74 - 139

Vinyl chloride 0.71 U 10.0 8.30 ug/L 83 59 - 147

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.58 U 10.0 7.86 ug/L 79 73 - 133

1,1-Dichloropropene 0.65 U 10.0 7.57 ug/L 76 70 - 136


Surrogate

100

MS MS




Client Sample ID: DW-1Lab Sample ID: 660-81098-1 DU



Acrolein 3.8 U 3.8 U ug/L NC 30

Analyte

DU DU

DUnitResult Qualifier

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier LimitRPD

RPD

Acrylonitrile 4.5 U 4.5 U ug/L NC 30

Benzene 0.50 U 0.50 U ug/L NC 30

Bromoform 0.63 U 0.63 U ug/L NC 30

Carbon tetrachloride 0.43 U 0.43 U ug/L NC 30

Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.44 U 0.44 U ug/L NC 30

Chlorobenzene 0.63 U 0.63 U ug/L NC 30

m-Xylene & p-Xylene 1.7 I 1.74 I ug/L 4 30

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 15 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15




Client Sample ID: DW-1Lab Sample ID: 660-81098-1 DU



Chlorodibromomethane 0.31 U 0.31 U ug/L NC 30

Analyte

DU DU


Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier LimitRPD

RPD

o-Xylene 0.55 I 0.543 I ug/L 2 30

Chloroethane 2.5 U 2.5 U ug/L NC 30

2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 0.95 U 0.95 U ug/L NC 30

Chloroform 0.90 U 0.90 U ug/L NC 30

Xylenes, Total 2.3 I 2.28 I ug/L 1 30

Dichlorobromomethane 0.44 U 0.44 U ug/L NC 30

1,1-Dichloroethane 0.52 U 0.52 U ug/L NC 30

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.57 U 0.57 U ug/L NC 30

1,1-Dichloroethene 0.67 U 0.67 U ug/L NC 30

1,2-Dichloropropane 0.52 U 0.52 U ug/L NC 30

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.39 U 0.39 U ug/L NC 30

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.27 U 0.27 U ug/L NC 30

Ethylbenzene 0.44 U 0.44 U ug/L NC 30

Bromomethane 2.5 U 2.5 U ug/L NC 30

Chloromethane 1.0 U 1.0 U ug/L NC 30

Methylene Chloride 5.0 U 5.0 U ug/L NC 30

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.17 U 0.17 U ug/L NC 30

Tetrachloroethene 0.50 U 0.50 U ug/L NC 30

Toluene 0.51 U 0.51 U ug/L NC 30

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.67 U 0.67 U ug/L NC 30

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.47 U 0.47 U ug/L NC 30

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.47 U 0.47 U ug/L NC 30

Trichloroethene 0.61 U 0.61 U ug/L NC 30

Vinyl chloride 0.71 U 0.71 U ug/L NC 30

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.58 U 0.58 U ug/L NC 30

1,1-Dichloropropene 0.65 U 0.65 U ug/L NC 30


Surrogate

104

DU DU




Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM)

Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 660-183720/1-A


Analysis Batch: 183770 Prep Batch: 183720

PQL MDL


MB MB


0.25 U 0.250.50 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 1Acenaphthylene

0.25 U 0.250.50 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 1Anthracene

0.050 U 0.0500.50 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 1Benzo[a]anthracene

0.25 U 0.250.50 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 1Benzo[a]pyrene

0.050 U 0.0500.50 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene

0.25 U 0.250.50 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene

0.25 U 0.250.50 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 16 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15



Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM) (Continued)




PQL MDL

Chrysene 0.25 U 0.50 0.25 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 1

MB MB


0.036 U 0.0360.50 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

0.25 U 0.250.50 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 1Fluoranthene

0.25 U 0.250.50 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 1Fluorene

0.050 U 0.0500.50 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene

0.25 U 0.250.50 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 11-Methylnaphthalene

0.25 U 0.250.50 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 12-Methylnaphthalene

0.321 I 0.250.50 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 1Naphthalene

0.386 I 0.250.50 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 1Phenanthrene

0.25 U 0.250.50 ug/L 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 1Pyrene

Fluoranthene-d10 88 35 - 140 06/09/17 07:34 1

MB MB

Surrogate

06/08/17 09:08

Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery

80 06/08/17 09:08 06/09/17 07:34 12-methylnaphthalene-d10 19 - 110

Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 660-183720/2-A



Acenaphthene 20.0 15.2 ug/L 76 35 - 110

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Acenaphthylene 20.0 15.4 ug/L 77 35 - 110

Anthracene 20.0 14.9 ug/L 75 34 - 110

Benzo[a]anthracene 20.0 16.8 ug/L 84 43 - 110

Benzo[a]pyrene 20.0 16.3 ug/L 82 36 - 109

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 20.0 16.4 ug/L 82 40 - 110

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 20.0 16.4 ug/L 82 35 - 111

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 20.0 14.4 ug/L 72 40 - 108

Chrysene 20.0 17.2 ug/L 86 40 - 113

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 20.0 16.9 ug/L 84 35 - 111

Fluoranthene 20.0 17.4 ug/L 87 36 - 110

Fluorene 20.0 16.4 ug/L 82 37 - 110

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 20.0 17.0 ug/L 85 36 - 111

1-Methylnaphthalene 20.0 13.2 ug/L 66 34 - 110

2-Methylnaphthalene 20.0 13.3 ug/L 66 33 - 110

Naphthalene 20.0 14.4 ug/L 72 33 - 110

Phenanthrene 20.0 15.4 ug/L 77 37 - 110

Pyrene 20.0 16.3 ug/L 81 39 - 105

Fluoranthene-d10 35 - 140

Surrogate

78

LCS LCS


682-methylnaphthalene-d10 19 - 110

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 17 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15



Method: 8011 - EDB, DBCP, and 1,2,3-TCP (GC)




PQL MDL

Ethylene Dibromide 0.010 U 0.020 0.010 ug/L 06/12/17 15:21 06/13/17 09:36 1

MB MB


1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 115 70 - 130 06/13/17 09:36 1

MB MB

Surrogate

06/12/17 15:21





Ethylene Dibromide 0.474 0.537 ug/L 113 44 - 150

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 70 - 130

Surrogate

108

LCS LCS


Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample DupLab Sample ID: LCSD 660-183886/11-A



Ethylene Dibromide 0.474 0.523 ug/L 111 44 - 150 3 30

Analyte

LCSD LCSD


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 70 - 130

Surrogate

112

LCSD LCSD


Method: FL-PRO - Florida - Petroleum Range Organics (GC)




PQL MDL


(C8-C40)

0.17 U 1.0 0.17 mg/L 06/09/17 07:55 06/09/17 20:04 1

MB MB


o-Terphenyl 75 J1 82 - 142 06/09/17 20:04 1

MB MB

Surrogate

06/09/17 07:55


83 06/09/17 07:55 06/09/17 20:04 1n-C39 42 - 193





(C8-C40)

1.70 1.28 mg/L 75 55 - 118

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 18 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15



Method: FL-PRO - Florida - Petroleum Range Organics (GC) (Continued)




o-Terphenyl J1 82 - 142

Surrogate

77

LCS LCS


90n-C39 42 - 193

Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample DupLab Sample ID: LCSD 660-183777/3-A




(C8-C40)

1.70 1.24 mg/L 73 55 - 118 3 20

Analyte

LCSD LCSD


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

o-Terphenyl J1 82 - 142

Surrogate

74

LCSD LCSD


88n-C39 42 - 193

Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)


Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total Recoverable


PQL MDL

Lead 0.0022 U 0.010 0.0022 mg/L 06/08/17 07:14 06/08/17 12:47 1

MB MB



Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total Recoverable


Lead 1.00 0.947 mg/L 95 80 - 120

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 19 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 660-81098-1Client: HSW Engineering, Inc.


GC/MS VOA


Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch

Water 8260B660-81098-1 DW-1 Total/NA

Water 8260B660-81098-2 MW-1 Total/NA




Water 8260BMB 660-183822/7 Method Blank Total/NA

Water 8260BLCS 660-183822/4 Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Water 8260B660-81098-2 MS MW-1 Total/NA

Water 8260B660-81098-1 DU DW-1 Total/NA

GC/MS Semi VOA

Prep Batch: 183720


Water 3510C660-81098-1 DW-1 Total/NA

Water 3510C660-81098-2 MW-1 Total/NA




Water 3510CMB 660-183720/1-A Method Blank Total/NA

Water 3510CLCS 660-183720/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA



Water 8270D SIM 183720MB 660-183720/1-A Method Blank Total/NA

Water 8270D SIM 183720LCS 660-183720/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA



Water 8270D SIM 183720660-81098-1 DW-1 Total/NA

Water 8270D SIM 183720660-81098-2 MW-1 Total/NA




GC Semi VOA

Prep Batch: 183777


Water 3510C660-81098-1 DW-1 Total/NA





Water 3510CMB 660-183777/1-A Method Blank Total/NA

Water 3510CLCS 660-183777/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Water 3510CLCSD 660-183777/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 20 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15



GC Semi VOA (Continued)



Water FL-PRO 183777660-81098-1 DW-1 Total/NA

Water FL-PRO 183777660-81098-2 MW-1 Total/NA




Water FL-PRO 183777MB 660-183777/1-A Method Blank Total/NA

Water FL-PRO 183777LCS 660-183777/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Water FL-PRO 183777LCSD 660-183777/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA

Prep Batch: 183886


Water 8011660-81098-2 MW-1 Total/NA

Water 8011MB 660-183886/9-A Method Blank Total/NA

Water 8011LCS 660-183886/10-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Water 8011LCSD 660-183886/11-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA



Water 8011 183886660-81098-2 MW-1 Total/NA

Water 8011 183886MB 660-183886/9-A Method Blank Total/NA

Water 8011 183886LCS 660-183886/10-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Water 8011 183886LCSD 660-183886/11-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA

Metals

Prep Batch: 183712


Water 3005A660-81098-2 MW-1 Total Recoverable

Water 3005AMB 660-183712/1-A Method Blank Total Recoverable

Water 3005ALCS 660-183712/2-A Lab Control Sample Total Recoverable



Water 6010B 183712660-81098-2 MW-1 Total Recoverable

Water 6010B 183712MB 660-183712/1-A Method Blank Total Recoverable

Water 6010B 183712LCS 660-183712/2-A Lab Control Sample Total Recoverable

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 21 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Lab ChronicleClient: HSW Engineering, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 660-81098-1


Client Sample ID: DW-1 Lab Sample ID: 660-81098-1Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 06/05/17 11:00


Analysis 8260B 06/10/17 13:32 K1P1 183822 TAL TAM

Type

Batch Batch

MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun

Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA

Prep 3510C 183720 06/08/17 09:08 RCB TAL TAMTotal/NA

Analysis 8270D SIM 1 183771 06/09/17 10:11 MWJ TAL TAMTotal/NA

Prep 3510C 183777 06/09/17 07:55 JAB TAL TAMTotal/NA

Analysis FL-PRO 1 183814 06/09/17 23:05 JAB TAL TAMTotal/NA

Client Sample ID: MW-1 Lab Sample ID: 660-81098-2Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 06/05/17 12:21



Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA



Prep 8011 183886 06/12/17 15:21 JAB TAL TAMTotal/NA

Analysis 8011 1 183887 06/13/17 10:28 JAB TAL TAMTotal/NA



Prep 3005A 183712 06/08/17 07:14 GAF TAL TAMTotal Recoverable

Analysis 6010B 1 183717 06/08/17 13:12 GAF TAL TAMTotal Recoverable




Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA








Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA





TestAmerica Tampa

Page 22 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15






Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA





Laboratory References:

TAL TAM = TestAmerica Tampa, 6712 Benjamin Road, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33634, TEL (813)885-7427

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 23 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Method SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 660-81098-1Client: HSW Engineering, Inc.


Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol

SW8468260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) TAL TAM

SW8468270D SIM Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM) TAL TAM

SW8468011 EDB, DBCP, and 1,2,3-TCP (GC) TAL TAM

FL-DEPFL-PRO Florida - Petroleum Range Organics (GC) TAL TAM

SW8466010B Metals (ICP) TAL TAM

Protocol References:

FL-DEP = State Of Florida Department Of Environmental Protection, Florida Administrative Code.

SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.



TestAmerica Tampa

Page 24 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Accreditation/Certification SummaryClient: HSW Engineering, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 660-81098-1


Laboratory: TestAmerica TampaThe accreditations/certifications listed below are applicable to this report.

Authority Program EPA Region Identification Number Expiration Date

Florida E842824NELAP 06-30-17 *

TestAmerica Tampa

* Accreditation/Certification renewal pending - accreditation/certification considered valid.

Page 25 of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

of 32 6/14/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Login Sample Receipt Checklist

Client: HSW Engineering, Inc. Job Number: 660-81098-1

Login Number: 81098

Question Answer Comment

Creator: Moccia, Vanessa M

List Source: TestAmerica Tampa

List Number: 1

N/ARadioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey

meter.

TrueThe cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.

TrueSample custody seals, if present, are intact.

TrueThe cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or

tampered with.

TrueSamples were received on ice.

TrueCooler Temperature is acceptable.

TrueCooler Temperature is recorded.

TrueCOC is present.

TrueCOC is filled out in ink and legible.

FalseCOC is filled out with all pertinent information. Analyses listed on COC; individual samples not

designated for specific analyses

TrueIs the Field Sampler's name present on COC?

FalseThere are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC. Received Trip Blank(s) not listed on COC.

TrueSamples are received within Holding Time (excluding tests with immediate

HTs)

TrueSample containers have legible labels.

TrueContainers are not broken or leaking.

TrueSample collection date/times are provided.

TrueAppropriate sample containers are used.

TrueSample bottles are completely filled.

TrueSample Preservation Verified.

TrueThere is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested

MS/MSDs

FalseContainers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is

<6mm (1/4").

TrueMultiphasic samples are not present.

TrueSamples do not require splitting or compositing.

N/AResidual Chlorine Checked.


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15




APPENDIX E Photolog – DPE System and Monitor Well Installation

Z:\6CN800101 Tupperware\08 Reports - Submittals - Permits\Site Assessment_JPC\Appendix E Photolog_System Install\Photo Log_Tupperware_Well Install.docx

Site Name – Tupperware Brands Corporation 14901 South Orange Blossom Trail Orlando, Florida 32837 Project #- 6CN800101

Photo 1

Dat

e: 4

/12/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti

Location / Orientation Facing west of installation of DW-1. Remarks Well Installation

Photo 2

Dat

e: 4

/12/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti

Location / Orientation Facing west of the installation of MW-4 by hand.

Remarks Well Installation



Photo 3

Dat

e: 4

/12/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti

Location / Orientation Facing south of the completion of MW-3. Remarks Well Installation

Photo 4

Dat

e: 4

/12/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti

Location / Orientation Facing east illustrating MW-4 well completion.




Photo 5

Dat

e: 4

/12/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti

Location / Orientation Facing west illustrating MW-1 and DW-1 well completion.


Photo 6

Dat

e: 4

/12/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti

Location / Orientation Facing North of MPE-1, 2, & 3 (right to left) and SSLEV-3 & 2 (right to left).

Remarks Duel Phase Extraction System



Photo 7

Dat

e: 4

/12/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti

Location / Orientation Facing north of MPE-5, 6, &7 (right to left) and SSVEL-1.

Remarks Duel Phase Extraction System

Photo 8

Dat

e: 4

/12/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti

Location / Orientation Facing north of DPE manifold. Remarks Duel Phase Extraction System



Photo 9

Dat

e: 4

/12/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti

Location / Orientation Facing northeast of DPE system trailer. Remarks Duel Phase Extraction System

Photo 10

Dat

e: 4

/12/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti

Location / Orientation Facing south of PCW holding tank. Remarks Duel Phase Extraction System



Photo 11

Dat

e: 4

/12/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti

Location / Orientation Extracted free product in DPE manifold site glass.

Remarks

Duel Phase Extraction System

Photo 12

Dat

e: 6

/5/1

7 P

hoto

grap

her:

J. C

icch

etti

Location / Orientation View west at south side of IT building. Remarks 7 RWs and 3 sub-slab vent wells.




Photo 13

Dat

e: 6

/5/1

7 P

hoto

grap

her:

J. C

icch

etti

Location / Orientation Roof of IT building. Remarks Solar-powered fan for sub-slab venting from three

lateral slotted pipes.


Dat

e:

Pho

togr

aphe

r:

Location / Orientation Remarks




APPENDIX F Soil Disposal Laboratory Analytical Report




Attn: Andrew Lawn

Authorized for release by:4/27/2017 11:48:50 AM





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Table of Contents




4/27/2017

Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1


Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4






Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12


Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




660-80284-1 Soil Disposal Solid 04/20/17 11:00 04/22/17 09:30

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 3 of 15 4/27/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14


Job ID: 660-80284-1


Narrative

Job Narrative

660-80284-1

Comments


Receipt

The sample was received on 4/22/2017 9:30 AM; the sample arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice. The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 3.5º C.

Metals

No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Qualifiers

Metals



Qualifier


Glossary



Abbreviation

%R Percent Recovery


CNF Contains no Free Liquid

DER Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference)



DLC Decision level concentration

MDA Minimum detectable activity

EDL Estimated Detection Limit

MDC Minimum detectable concentration



NC Not Calculated

ND Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)


QC Quality Control

RER Relative error ratio





TestAmerica Tampa

Page 5 of 15 4/27/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Client Sample ID: Soil Disposal Lab Sample ID: 660-80284-1

Barium

PQL

500 ug/L

MDL

30


TCLP1I46 6010B

TestAmerica Tampa


Page 6 of 15 4/27/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Lab Sample ID: 660-80284-1Client Sample ID: Soil DisposalMatrix: SolidDate Collected: 04/20/17 11:00


Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPPQL MDL

Arsenic 120 U 1000 120 ug/L 04/25/17 14:00 04/26/17 08:57 1


500 30 ug/L 04/25/17 14:00 04/26/17 08:57 1Barium 46 I

500 18 ug/L 04/25/17 14:00 04/26/17 08:57 1Cadmium 18 U

1000 50 ug/L 04/25/17 14:00 04/26/17 08:57 1Chromium 50 U

1000 40 ug/L 04/25/17 14:00 04/26/17 08:57 1Lead 40 U

500 150 ug/L 04/25/17 14:00 04/26/17 08:57 1Selenium 150 U

500 50 ug/L 04/25/17 14:00 04/26/17 08:57 1Silver 50 U

Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPPQL MDL

Mercury 0.50 U 0.70 0.50 ug/L 04/26/17 12:40 04/26/17 17:29 1


TestAmerica Tampa

Page 7 of 15 4/27/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)


Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA


Arsenic 5000 5000 ug/L 100 75 - 125

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Barium 5000 4920 ug/L 98 75 - 125

Cadmium 5000 4940 ug/L 99 75 - 125

Chromium 5000 5100 ug/L 102 75 - 125

Lead 5000 4870 ug/L 97 75 - 125

Selenium 5000 5200 ug/L 104 75 - 125

Silver 5000 4920 ug/L 98 75 - 125

Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 660-182109/1-B

Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP


PQL MDL

Arsenic 120 U 1000 120 ug/L 04/25/17 14:00 04/26/17 08:48 1

LB LB


30 U 30500 ug/L 04/25/17 14:00 04/26/17 08:48 1Barium

18 U 18500 ug/L 04/25/17 14:00 04/26/17 08:48 1Cadmium

50 U 501000 ug/L 04/25/17 14:00 04/26/17 08:48 1Chromium

40 U 401000 ug/L 04/25/17 14:00 04/26/17 08:48 1Lead

150 U 150500 ug/L 04/25/17 14:00 04/26/17 08:48 1Selenium

50 U 50500 ug/L 04/25/17 14:00 04/26/17 08:48 1Silver

Client Sample ID: Soil DisposalLab Sample ID: 660-80284-1 MS



Arsenic 120 U 5000 4900 ug/L 98 75 - 125

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

Barium 46 I 5000 4990 ug/L 99 75 - 125

Cadmium 18 U 5000 4910 ug/L 98 75 - 125

Chromium 50 U 5000 5000 ug/L 100 75 - 125

Lead 40 U 5000 4810 ug/L 96 75 - 125

Selenium 150 U 5000 5100 ug/L 102 75 - 125

Silver 50 U 5000 4920 ug/L 98 75 - 125

Client Sample ID: Soil DisposalLab Sample ID: 660-80284-1 MSD



Arsenic 120 U 5000 4950 ug/L 99 75 - 125 1 20

Analyte

MSD MSD


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

Barium 46 I 5000 5010 ug/L 99 75 - 125 0 20

Cadmium 18 U 5000 4980 ug/L 100 75 - 125 1 20

Chromium 50 U 5000 5070 ug/L 101 75 - 125 1 20

Lead 40 U 5000 4880 ug/L 98 75 - 125 1 20

Selenium 150 U 5000 5150 ug/L 103 75 - 125 1 20

Silver 50 U 5000 4970 ug/L 99 75 - 125 1 20

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 8 of 15 4/27/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA)


Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA


Mercury 1.40 1.43 ug/L 102 80 - 120

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 660-182109/1-C



PQL MDL

Mercury 0.50 U 0.70 0.50 ug/L 04/26/17 12:40 04/26/17 17:28 1

LB LB


Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 660-182159/1-C



PQL MDL

Mercury 0.50 U 0.70 0.50 ug/L 04/26/17 12:40 04/26/17 17:16 1

LB LB


TestAmerica Tampa

Page 9 of 15 4/27/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Metals

Leach Batch: 182109


Solid 1311660-80284-1 Soil Disposal TCLP

Solid 1311LB 660-182109/1-B Method Blank TCLP

Solid 1311LB 660-182109/1-C Method Blank TCLP

Solid 1311660-80284-1 MS Soil Disposal TCLP

Solid 1311660-80284-1 MSD Soil Disposal TCLP

Prep Batch: 182134


Solid 3010A 182109660-80284-1 Soil Disposal TCLP

Solid 3010A 182109LB 660-182109/1-B Method Blank TCLP

Solid 3010ALCS 660-182134/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Solid 3010A 182109660-80284-1 MS Soil Disposal TCLP

Solid 3010A 182109660-80284-1 MSD Soil Disposal TCLP



Solid 6010B 182134660-80284-1 Soil Disposal TCLP

Solid 6010B 182134LB 660-182109/1-B Method Blank TCLP

Solid 6010B 182134LCS 660-182134/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Solid 6010B 182134660-80284-1 MS Soil Disposal TCLP

Solid 6010B 182134660-80284-1 MSD Soil Disposal TCLP

Leach Batch: 182159


Solid 1311LB 660-182159/1-C Method Blank TCLP

Prep Batch: 182167



Solid 7470A 182109LB 660-182109/1-C Method Blank TCLP


Solid 7470ALCS 660-182167/14-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA






Solid 7470A 182167LCS 660-182167/14-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 10 of 15 4/27/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Client Sample ID: Soil Disposal Lab Sample ID: 660-80284-1Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 04/20/17 11:00


Leach 1311 04/24/17 19:00 GH1182109 TAL TAM

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP

Prep 3010A 182134 04/25/17 14:00 GH1 TAL TAMTCLP

Analysis 6010B 1 182154 04/26/17 08:57 GAF TAL TAMTCLP

Leach 1311 182109 04/24/17 19:00 GH1 TAL TAMTCLP

Prep 7470A 182167 04/26/17 12:40 GH1 TAL TAMTCLP

Analysis 7470A 1 182178 04/26/17 17:29 GH1 TAL TAMTCLP



TestAmerica Tampa

Page 11 of 15 4/27/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




SW8466010B Metals (ICP) TAL TAM

SW8467470A Mercury (CVAA) TAL TAM


SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.



TestAmerica Tampa

Page 12 of 15 4/27/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Laboratory: TestAmerica TampaUnless otherwise noted, all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each accreditation/certification below.


Florida E842824NELAP 06-30-17

Analysis Method Prep Method Matrix Analyte

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 13 of 15 4/27/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

of 15 4/27/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Login Number: 80284


Creator: Moccia, Vanessa M


List Number: 1


meter.




tampered with.

TrueSamples were received on ice.



TrueCOC is present.


TrueCOC is filled out with all pertinent information.


TrueThere are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC.


HTs)








MS/MSDs

N/AContainers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is

<6mm (1/4").





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




APPENDIX G PCW Waste Manifests




APPENDIX H Photolog – Absorbent Socks

Z:\6CN800101 Tupperware\08 Reports - Submittals - Permits\Site Assessment_JPC\Appendix H Photolog_Absorbant Socks\Photo Log_Tupperware_Sox 2017 08.docx


Photo 1

Dat

e: 6

/13/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti

Location / Orientation Remarks Approx. 7” of staining measured on MPE-1

Photo 2

Dat

e: 6

/13/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti




Photo 3

Dat

e: 6

/13/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti


Photo 4

Dat

e: 6

/13/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti




Photo 5

Dat

e: 6

/13/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti


Photo 6

Dat

e: 6

/13/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti

Location / Orientation Remarks Approx. 0.50” of staining measured on MPE-6



Photo 7

Dat

e: 6

/13/

17

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti


Photo 8

Dat

e: 6

/30/

217

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti




Photo 9

Dat

e: 6

/30/

217

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cicc

hett

i


Photo 10

Dat

e: 6

/30/

217

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti




Photo 11

Dat

e: 6

/30/

217

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti


Photo 12

Dat

e: 6

/30/

217

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti




Photo 13

Dat

e: 6

/30/

217

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti


Photo 14

Dat

e: 6

/30/

217

Pho

togr

aphe

r: J.

Cic

chet

ti





APPENDIX I Exhaust Fan Laboratory Analytical Report




Attn: Andrew Lawn

Authorized for release by:7/6/2017 4:41:49 PM





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Table of Contents




7/6/2017

Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1


Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4






Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11


Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




660-81540-1 Exhaust Fan-1 Air - Tedlar Bag 06/30/17 10:50 07/01/17 09:10

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 3 of 14 7/6/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14


Job ID: 660-81540-1


Narrative

Job Narrative

660-81540-1

Comments


Receipt

The sample was received on 7/1/2017 9:10 AM; the sample arrived in good condition. The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 23.6º C.

GC/MS VOA

Method(s) EPA-18: The sample duplicate (DUP) precision for analytical batch 660-184692 was outside control limits.



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Qualifiers

Air - GC/MS VOA



Qualifier

J3 Estimated value; value may not be accurate. Spike recovery or RPD outside of criteria.

Glossary



Abbreviation

%R Percent Recovery


CNF Contains No Free Liquid

DER Duplicate Error Ratio (normalized absolute difference)


DL Detection Limit (DoD/DOE)


DLC Decision Level Concentration (Radiochemistry)

EDL Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin)

LOD Limit of Detection (DoD/DOE)

LOQ Limit of Quantitation (DoD/DOE)

MDA Minimum Detectable Activity (Radiochemistry)

MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry)



NC Not Calculated

ND Not Detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)


QC Quality Control

RER Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry)





TestAmerica Tampa

Page 5 of 14 7/6/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Client Sample ID: Exhaust Fan-1 Lab Sample ID: 660-81540-1

o-Xylene

PQL

1.0 mg/m3

MDL

1.0


Total/NA11.3 EPA-18

Total Hydrocarbons 10 mg/m310 Total/NA1260 EPA-18

TestAmerica Tampa


Page 6 of 14 7/6/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Lab Sample ID: 660-81540-1Client Sample ID: Exhaust Fan-1Matrix: Air - Tedlar BagDate Collected: 06/30/17 10:50


Method: EPA-18 - Volatile Organic CompoundsPQL MDL

Benzene 1.0 U 1.0 1.0 mg/m3 07/01/17 13:53 1


1.0 1.0 mg/m3 07/01/17 13:53 1Ethylbenzene 1.0 U

1.0 1.0 mg/m3 07/01/17 13:53 1Methyl tert-butyl ether 1.0 U

2.0 2.0 mg/m3 07/01/17 13:53 1m-Xylene & p-Xylene 2.0 U

1.0 1.0 mg/m3 07/01/17 13:53 1o-Xylene 1.3

1.0 1.0 mg/m3 07/01/17 13:53 1Toluene 1.0 U

10 10 mg/m3 07/01/17 13:53 1Total Hydrocarbons 260

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 7 of 14 7/6/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Method: EPA-18 - Volatile Organic Compounds

Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 660-184692/8

Matrix: Air - Tedlar Bag Prep Type: Total/NA


PQL MDL

Benzene 1.0 U 1.0 1.0 mg/m3 07/01/17 13:26 1

MB MB


1.0 U 1.01.0 mg/m3 07/01/17 13:26 1Ethylbenzene

1.0 U 1.01.0 mg/m3 07/01/17 13:26 1Methyl tert-butyl ether

2.0 U 2.02.0 mg/m3 07/01/17 13:26 1m-Xylene & p-Xylene

1.0 U 1.01.0 mg/m3 07/01/17 13:26 1o-Xylene

1.0 U 1.01.0 mg/m3 07/01/17 13:26 1Toluene

10 U 1010 mg/m3 07/01/17 13:26 1Total Hydrocarbons




Benzene 20.0 19.0 mg/m3 95 50 - 150

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Ethylbenzene 20.0 20.2 mg/m3 101 50 - 150

Methyl tert-butyl ether 20.0 15.9 mg/m3 79 50 - 150

m-Xylene & p-Xylene 40.0 43.1 mg/m3 108 50 - 150

o-Xylene 20.0 21.4 mg/m3 107 50 - 150

Toluene 20.0 17.4 mg/m3 87 50 - 150




Total Hydrocarbons 900 836 mg/m3 93 50 - 150

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Client Sample ID: Exhaust Fan-1Lab Sample ID: 660-81540-1 DU



Benzene 1.0 U 1.0 U mg/m3 NC 30

Analyte

DU DU


Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier LimitRPD

RPD

Ethylbenzene 1.0 U 1.0 U mg/m3 NC 30

Methyl tert-butyl ether 1.0 U 1.0 U mg/m3 NC 30

m-Xylene & p-Xylene 2.0 U 2.0 U mg/m3 NC 30

o-Xylene 1.3 1.0 U mg/m3 NC 30

Toluene 1.0 U 1.0 U mg/m3 NC 30

Total Hydrocarbons 260 155 J3 mg/m3 49 30

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 8 of 14 7/6/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Air - GC/MS VOA



Air - Tedlar Bag EPA-18660-81540-1 Exhaust Fan-1 Total/NA

Air - Tedlar Bag EPA-18MB 660-184692/8 Method Blank Total/NA

Air - Tedlar Bag EPA-18LCS 660-184692/4 Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Air - Tedlar Bag EPA-18LCS 660-184692/6 Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Air - Tedlar Bag EPA-18660-81540-1 DU Exhaust Fan-1 Total/NA

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 9 of 14 7/6/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Client Sample ID: Exhaust Fan-1 Lab Sample ID: 660-81540-1Matrix: Air - Tedlar BagDate Collected: 06/30/17 10:50


Analysis EPA-18 07/01/17 13:53 ECC1 184692 TAL TAM

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA



TestAmerica Tampa

Page 10 of 14 7/6/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




EPAEPA-18 Volatile Organic Compounds TAL TAM


EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency



TestAmerica Tampa

Page 11 of 14 7/6/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Laboratory: TestAmerica TampaUnless otherwise noted, all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each accreditation/certification below.


Florida E842824NELAP 06-30-18

Analysis Method Prep Method Matrix Analyte

The following analytes are included in this report, but are not accredited/certified under this accreditation/certification:

EPA-18 Air - Tedlar Bag Benzene

EPA-18 Air - Tedlar Bag Ethylbenzene

EPA-18 Air - Tedlar Bag Methyl tert-butyl ether

EPA-18 Air - Tedlar Bag m-Xylene & p-Xylene

EPA-18 Air - Tedlar Bag o-Xylene

EPA-18 Air - Tedlar Bag Toluene

EPA-18 Air - Tedlar Bag Total Hydrocarbons

TestAmerica Tampa

Page 12 of 14 7/6/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

of 14 7/6/2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Login Number: 81540


Creator: Southers, Kristin B


List Number: 1


meter.




tampered with.

N/ASamples were received on ice. Thermal preservation not required.



TrueCOC is present.


TrueCOC is filled out with all pertinent information.


TrueThere are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC.


HTs)








MS/MSDs

N/AContainers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is

<6mm (1/4").





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERATOR SPILL AT TUPPERWARE …

Documents

Transcript of SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERATOR SPILL AT TUPPERWARE …