Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

download Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

of 16

Transcript of Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

  • 8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

    1/16

    Issue 230Copyright © 2011-2014 www.Propwise.sg. All Rights Reserved.

    http://www.propwise.sg/http://www.propwise.sg/

  • 8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

    2/16

    ContributeDo you have articles and insights and articles that you’d like to share

    with thousands of readers interested in the Singapore property

    market? Send them to us at [email protected] , and if they’re good

    enough, we’ll publish them here, on our blog and even on Yahoo!

    News.

    AdvertiseWant to get your brand, product, service or property listing out to

    thousands of Singapore property investors at a very reasonable

    cost? Head over to www.propwise.sg/advertise/ to find out more.

    CONTENTS

    p2 Why the Government Should Tweak

    the Property Cooling Measures

    p11 Singapore Property News This Week

    p15 Resale Property Transactions

    (September 29 – October 6 )

    Welcome to the 230th edition of the

    Singapore Property Weekly .

    Hope you like it!

    Mr. Propwise

    FROM THE

    EDITOR

    mailto:[email protected]://www.propwise.sg/advertise/http://www.propwise.sg/advertise/mailto:[email protected]

  • 8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

    3/16

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

    Page | 2Back to Contents

    By Paul Ho (guest contributor)

    Although Singapore runs a surplus almost

    every election cycle, this surplus does not

    include land sales. Hence Singapore runs a

    much larger   “surplus”   than reported in the

    budget. While the IMF treats Land Sales as

    revenues,   Singapore’s   Ministry of finance

    treats land sales as Capital Receipts. What

    this means is, any land sales are added into

    Singapore’s   past reserves as capital

    gains/losses.

    Why the Government Should Tweak the PropertyCooling Measures

  • 8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

    4/16

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

    Page | 3Back to Contents

    According to the URA, from Jan 2011 to Sep

    2015, the proceeds from just Commercial,

    Hotel, White, Industrial, Residential

    (excluding landed housing) and other sites

    amounted to some $24 billion in land sales.

    And this has not included land sales by the

    HDB for EC, BTO and DBSS sites.

    Still 40,000 unsold non-landed residential

    units in the pipeline

    According to the URA, there are 64,437private non-landed units and 2,774 Landed

    Units to be completed between 2H2015 and

    2019, based on the 2Q15 forecast.   Figure1: Pipeline Supply of Private

    Residential Units, Q2, 2015, Property Market

    information, URA.

  • 8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

    5/16

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

    Page | 4Back to Contents

    On the other hand, the actual demand over

    the past decade for private non-landed

    homes averaged only 8,000 units annually,

    based on the change in occupied stock for

    non-landed homes.

    This pipeline of supply is coming on the back

    of a vacancy rate of 7.9% (25,071 units) in

    2Q15.The Total Stock is 318,524 while

    Occupied Units are 293,453.

    As for sales, between Jan 2014 to Dec 2014,there were only about 8,000 units of new sale

    Private residential units being transacted with

    a subsale of 500 units (including EC).

    As of 2Q15, there were some 24,435 units of

    unsold uncompleted residential units versus64,437 (Non-landed Private residential   –

    Excluding EC).

    Figure 2: Number of Unsold Private

    Residential Units from Projects with PlanningApprovals, URA, 2Q 2015, URAAnnex B-1.

    In short, this means there are 40,002 of

    unsold private non-landed residential units in

    the pipeline competing to be sold.

  • 8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

    6/16

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

    Page | 5Back to Contents

    Who will be staying in all these upcoming

    units?

    Figure3: Population Change versus housing

    stock change (URA, Singstat, Century21,

    iCompareLoan.com)

    From 2005 to 2014,   Singapore’s   population

    increased by 1.3million and the housing stock

    increased by 171,870 units. This indicates

    7.58 people per household. This is more than

    double the average  Singaporean’s household

    size of 3.5 to 3.6. Part of the reason could be

    attributed to workers staying in dormitories,

    domestic helpers staying with their

    employers, or room rentals.

    Figure 4: Average Household size of

    Singaporeans and PR households (Singstat)

  • 8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

    7/16

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

    Page | 6Back to Contents

    If we are working on 64,437 units becoming

    ready from 2H 2015 through 2019. That

    means an average of 15,000 units a year

    while our current new unit sales trend is about

    8,000 to 10,000 units. This indicates a

    possible build-up of unsold units to the tune of

    25,000 to 30,000 units in fouryears’ time. This

    adds to the already elevated private

    residential unsold rate.

    Can foreigners fill up these units?Based on 7.58 people per household, 30,000

    vacant units will need about 227,000 in

    population growth (with the same foreigner

    mix) within the next three to four years to fill

    them up, either to rent and stay or simply to

    buy and stay.

    Foreigners will find it costly as the Additional

    Buyer Stamp Duty (ABSD) is punitive at 15%.

    Except for the ultra-high-income expatriates,

    the likelihood of them being able to save an

    additional $180,000 for a $1m property to pay

    stamp duties is low. Many foreigners will most

    likely end up renting a place in Singapore,

    supporting the rental market.

    Will homeowners experience negative

    equity levels in the next 5 years?

    Singapore’s   housing prices have been

    gradually dropping at around three to five

    percent a year since 2014.

    Figure5: Price Change in Non-landed

    Properties, URA

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY I 230

  • 8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

    8/16

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

    Page | 7Back to Contents

    Let’s assume an annual price drop of 4% per

    year and a price drop of 20% in five years.

    Figure 6: Amortization using 1.7% mortgage

    rates for the first three years. (Assumption:

    interest rates are static)

    A property bought at $1.25million with a loan

    of $1million (at an 80% Loan To Valuation)

    would be worth $1m in five years. The loan

    balance will be ~$870,000 if interest rates

    stay at the same level. We would have aproperty valued at $1m and loan outstanding

    of $870,000. Loan to Value has increased to

    87%, but is still not in the dangerous negative

    equity zone, as long as the economy is not

    severely impacted and interest rates increase

    moderately.

    Why help the property developers?

    While we could argue that developers only

    have themselves to blame for bidding high

    prices for land only to be stuck with unsold

    stock, developers are merely proxy   “tax”  or

    “capital receipts”  collectors on behalf of the

    government who is the largest landlord andcontrols immigration policies.

    Perhaps the root cause is the over-eagerness

    of the Singapore government to release as

    much land supply as possible during

    attractive pricing to fill the reserves while

    constricting supply during periods of low land

    prices, when what was needed was a

    constant and measured supply to smooth out

    market volatility.

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY I 230

  • 8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

    9/16

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

    Page | 8Back to Contents

    The government should allow developers to

    delay their completion of the development

    without incurring penalties so as to shift some

    of these property supply to the later years in

    2017, 2018, 2019 and beyond. Or they couldallow developers to return the land to the

    government and indefinitely shelf the building

    plans with a penalty payable based on the

    number of years delayed, or simply cancel

    the contract outright with a penalty. This

    would enable developers to cut loss and

    move out of this difficult situation.

    The government should act to solve this

    problem

    As property prices are dropping and rentals

    weakening at the same time, there is a needto solve the vacancy challenge.

    The Singapore government is keen to bring in

    a higher population to solve many problems,

    but with the weakening economy,

    employment growth may be muted for

    foreigners as well as Singaporeans and PRs.

    At the very least the ABSD needs to be

    reduced for foreigners as well as for

    Singaporeans and PRs buying their second

    or greater property as long as they meet the

    TDSR guidelines.

    Ideas to tweak the Total Debt Servicing

    Ratio (TDSR)

    The TDSR is a good policy and should stay to

    ensure financial prudence. However, the

    TDSR is artificially reducing the demand for

    property not due to its limitation of

    indebtedness, but due to the huge paperwork

    burden it places on the property buyer just for

    the bank to check and comply with the TDSR.

    This includes obtaining car loan statements,

    credit card statements, etc.

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

  • 8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

    10/16

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

    Page | 9Back to Contents

    Banks and financial institutions do not

    necessarily print and deliver monthly

    statements and calling their hotline will set

    you back by thirty minutes, while printing a

    statement will cost you $20.

    Financial institutions are not helping to

    provide the timely release of statements

    required for housing loan applications.

    Perhaps the MAS could coordinate a bureau

    where such information are shared in a better

    manner so that banks can check with a

    central bureau to obtain the information they

    need instead of burdening the buyers to fulfill

    the onerous paperwork requirements. A

    suggestion could be that a Buyer simply signs

    an authorization form to a bank to allow abank to seek the information from the other

    banks to retrieve the statements, freeing up

    the burden on the home buyer.

    The MAS could also mandate all financial

    services providers to provide monthly

    statements within three days upon a request

    by customers who require this for bank

    financing purposes.

    The TDSR could potentially be relaxed for

    people with high income and/or small

    business owners to allow them greater

    flexibility in leveraging and having access to

    funds to create employment.

    Increasing transparency will help

    developers and consumers

    Developers need help too. Going forward, the

    government could make known its plans in

    immigration and regulation pertaining to any

    piece of land. By providing more transparency

    on the land parcels to be released five years

    ahead of schedule,

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

  • 8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

    11/16

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

    Page | 10Back to Contents

    developers will then know the five year land

    supply forecast and bid responsibly.

    End consumers will also likely end up with

    property prices that do not swing wildly. The

    government has the Reserves to do it and

    should not simply restrict land supplies to

    hold out for the highest prices, only to release

    massive parcels of land when it hit the price

    sweet spot, as this simply becomes a land tax

    which ripples across industries, raising

    business costs and making Singapore

    uncompetitive and home prices unaffordable.

    By Paul Ho, holder of an MBA from a 

    reputable university and editor of  

    www.iCompareLoan.com ,   Singapore’s   first 

    Cloud-based Home Loan reporting platform used by Property agents, financial advisors 

    as well as Mortgage brokers.

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

    http://www.icompareloan.com/http://propertymarketinsights.com/http://www.icompareloan.com/http://www.icompareloan.com/http://www.icompareloan.com/http://www.icompareloan.com/http://www.icompareloan.com/

  • 8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

    12/16

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

    Singapore Property This Week

    Page | 11Back to Contents

    Residential

    Condo resale price increase by 2.8% in 

    prime areas in September 

    In the core central region, non-landed private

    home resale prices have increased by 2.8%

    in September from the previous month. In the

    rest of central region and the outside central

    region, resale prices fell by 1.4% and 0.9%

    respectively over the same period of time.

    Not only so, the   SRX’s  overall resale price

    index for non-landed private homes also fell

    by 0.1% month-on-month in September.

    Eugene Lim from ERA Realty said that the

    increase in resale prices in the core central

    region could have been due to the lack of

    new launches within that region. Buyers may

    have thus entered the resale market to seek

    properties.

    (Source: Business Times)

    Condo rents fall by 0.3% in September 

    According to SRX Property, rents of private

    non-landed residential units have fallen by0.3% month-on-month in September. Rental

    volumes have also fallen by 4.1%. SRX

    Property estimates that there were 3,758

    rental transactions made in September, down

    from the 3,919 made in August. Year-on-year,

    there is a 17.7% increase in rentaltransactions in September. According to

    Eugene Lim from ERA Realty, this could be

    due to existing tenants taking advantage of

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

  • 8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

    13/16

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

    Page | 12Back to Contents

    lower rents by signing shorter leases and

    moving around.

    (Source: Business Times)

    341 private homes sold by developers in 

    September 

    Data from the Urban Redevelopment

    Authority showed that only 341 private homes

    were sold by developers in September this

    year. This makes it the lowest recorded figure

    since the start of the year. Excludingexecutive condominiums, the number of

    private homes sold by developers is 34%

    lower than in August. The slump in sales may

    be attributed to a reduction in developer

    launches, the Hungry Ghost month and other

    festivities during H2 of the year. Apart fromthat, market experts believe that the erratic

    stock market could have also dampened

    buying sentiments. Ong Teck Hui from JLL

    said that the softening of the economy and

    difficult business environment were likely

    factors that contributed to the slow sales.

    (Source: Business Times)

    Normanton Park up for collective sale 

    Located near Kent Ridge Park, the

    condominium, Normanton Park will be put up

    for collective sale after the requisite of 80%

    majority consent was secured from owners.

    Yet, due to the expansiveness of the site,

    developers may not be as keen to take up thissite, said market experts. This is because it

    may be difficult to sell off all units, in light of

    the additional buyers’ stamp duty which will be

    applied to unsold units five years after the

    land purchase date. Nicholas Mak from SLP

    International believes that the reserve price of$840 million may be high for developers. The

    site’s tender will close on Jan 19, added the

    Business Times.

    (Source: Business Times)

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

  • 8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

    14/16

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

    Page | 13Back to Contents

    More BTO flats to be released next year 

    To meet higher demand arising from recent

    policy changes, more HDB flats may be

    released next year. National Development

    Minister Lawrence Wong said that HDB will

    look into supplying more flats. Nonetheless,

    Wong said that the government will continue

    to taper the housing programme and make

    temporary adjustments to accommodate

    higher demand. He added that the

    government will take into consideration the

    responses of next   month’s   BTO sale

    exercise, when planning the supply of flats for

    the coming year. Not only so, he added that

    the cooling measures will be retained as price

    adjustments observed so far have been

    moderate.

    (Source: Business Times)

    Commercial

    Rental growth in business parks and 

    factories eases in Q3 

    Data from DTZ showed that the averagemonthly gross rents of first-storey and upper-

    storey conventional factory space have fallen

    by 2.3% and 2.9% respectively in Q3 from the

    previous quarter. Rental growth in business

    parks in Q3 remained constant at $5.10 psf

    quarter-on-quarter in Q3. For the past 13quarters, the monthly gross rents for business

    parks and high-tech sectors have increased

    by an average of 0.8% quarter-on-quarter

    and 0.7% quarter-on-quarter. Cheng Siow

    Ying from DTZ said that leasing activities are

    slower as occupiers are opting to renew theirleases or seek expansion space within the

    existing building.

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

  • 8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

    15/16

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

    Page | 14Back to Contents

    In addition, experts believe that overall, rents

    are unlikely to increase in 2016.

    (Source: Business Times)

    Prime-office rents may fall by 3% in next 3 years 

    According to market experts, prime-office

    rents may fall by 3% over the next 3 years

    due to a 7.6 million sq ft increase in supply of

    gross floor area. The new supply of office

    spaces planned especially in the centralbusiness district, is likely to limit rental

    growth, said Alice Tan from Knight Frank.

    Premium-grade offices with large floor plates

    of over 10,000 sq ft are most likely to suffer

    the largest cut in terms of rental growth.

    According to Tan, an estimated 10% drop in

    rents for large premium-grade office space

    next year is expected.

    (Source: Business Times)

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

    http://www.moneymatters.sg/

  • 8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 230

    16/16

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 230

    Page | 15Back to Contents

    Non-Landed Residential Resale Property Transactions for the Week of Sep 30  – Oct 6

    NOTE: This data only covers non-landed residential resale propertytransactions with caveats lodged with the Singapore Land Authority.Typically, caveats are lodged at least 2-3 weeks after a purchasersigns an OTP, hence the lagged nature of the data.

    Postal

    DistrictProject Name

    Area

    (sqft)

    Transacted

    Price ($)

    Price

    ($ psf)Tenure

    1 MARINA BAY SUITES 2,691 6,500,000 2,415 99

    1 THE SAIL @ MARINA BAY 614 1,070,000 1,744 99

    5 THE VISION 904 1,190,000 1,316 995 THE MAYLEA 969 1,200,000 1,239 FH

    5 FLYNN PARK 2,024 2,420,000 1,196 FH

    5 BLUE HORIZON 1,152 1,120,000 972 99

    8 MERA SPRINGS 1,044 1,370,000 1,312 FH

    9 THE VERV @ RV 1,130 1,838,000 1,626 FH

    9 OLEANAS RESIDENCE 1,238 1,860,000 1,503 FH

    9 UE SQUARE 1,959 2,650,000 1,353 929

    9 TRIBECA 3,907 5,000,000 1,280 FH

    10 VALLEY PARK 1,356 2,090,000 1,541 999

    10 THE MARBELLA 1,464 2,180,000 1,489 FH

    10 THE LEGEND 1,464 1,850,000 1,264 FH

    11 ROCHELLE AT NEWTON 1,012 1,488,000 1,471 99

    11 TEN @ SUFFOLK 1,206 1,600,000 1,327 FH

    12 BLISS LOFT 452 650,000 1,438 FH

    12 DE PARADISO 1,238 1,370,000 1,107 FH

    12 AVA TOWERS 1,227 1,038,000 846 FH

    13 LEICESTER SUITES 484 788,000 1,627 FH

    13 WOODSVILLE 28 1,195 1,300,000 1,088 99

    13 THE ACACIAS 1,378 1,420,000 1,031 FH

    14 MELOSA 506 678,000 1,340 FH

    14 ATRIUM RESIDENCES 1,001 970,000 969 FH

    15 SILVERSEA   1,518 2,500,000 1,647 99

    15 THE MAKENA   1,636 2,050,000 1,253 FH

    Postal

    DistrictProject Name

    Area

    (sqft)

    Transacted

    Price ($)

    Price

    ($ psf)Tenure

    15 RIVEREDGE 1,335 1,600,000 1,199 99

    15 BLU CORAL 1,087 1,140,000 1,049 FH

    16 CASA MERAH 990 1,200,000 1,212 9916 COUNTRY PARK CONDOMINIUM 1,313 1,420,000 1,081 FH

    16 TANAMERA CREST 1,195 1,000,000 837 99

    19 A TREASURE TROVE 775 850,000 1,097 99

    19 THE YARDLEY 1,270 1,380,000 1,086 FH

    19 CASA RIVIERA 1,378 1,375,000 998 FH

    19 RIO VISTA 2,454 1,720,000 701 99

    20 SKY HABITAT 1,066 1,717,920 1,612 99

    20 SEASONS VIEW 1,141 1,070,000 938 99

    20 BRADDELL VIEW 1,615 1,350,000 836 99

    21 THE CASCADIA 1,916 1,850,000 966 FH

    21 PINE GROVE 1,765 1,239,800 702 99

    22 THE CENTRIS 1,884 1,785,000 948 99

    23 THE MADEIRA 1,055 995,000 943 99

    23 HILLINGTON GREEN 1,356 1,262,000 930 999

    23 MI CASA 1,259 1,120,000 889 99

    23 CASHEW PARK CONDOMINIUM 1,475 1,288,000 873 999

    23 THE WARREN 1,238 1,035,000 836 99

    23 REGENT HEIGHTS 1,173 900,000 767 99

    25 PARC ROSEWOOD 431 528,000 1,226 99

    26 CASTLE GREEN   947 833,000 879 99

    28 SELETAR SPRINGS CONDOMINIUM 1,302 870,000 668 99