Simulmedia Book of Reach Vol. 2
-
Upload
simulmedia -
Category
Documents
-
view
227 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Simulmedia Book of Reach Vol. 2
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
1
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
2
The Book Of Reach Volume 2Q3-Q4 2012the impact of audience fragmentation on tV
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
3
audience fragmentation is causing TV’s reach problem.
In the past 30 years, an exponential growth of new media products, channels and platforms has resulted in an extraordinary fragmentation of consumer attention. Television alone has seen a tenfold increase in the number of channels and a hundred-fold increase in the number of programs and episodes. The result is that TV advertisers across all industries are failing to achieve sufficient reach with their TV campaigns.
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
4
Source: Nielsen Cross-Platform Report Q3 2012
Problem: UPFroNT GrPs INClUDe FAr more FreQUeNCY THAN 20 YeArs AGo today, it takes 3x the number of impressions to reach 1/3rd as many people
reACH
FreQUeNCY
R
F
AbCCbsNbCFox
Total
7.87.77.15.8
A 18-49rating
# Ads to Deliver100 GrPs
1313141858
AbCCbsNbCFox
Total
3.74.65.13.2
A 18-49rating
# Ads to Deliver100 GrPs
27222032101
AbCCbsNbCFox
Total
2.12.52.12.5
A 18-49rating
# Ads to Deliver 100 GrPs
48404840176
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
5
fixing audience fragmentation still requires tV
Television is still the most engaging and powerful advertising medium available. on a weekly basis, the average American watches 35 hours of TV compared to only 1 hour of online video. even the lightest TV viewers watch more than double the amount of TV compared to online video. leveraging tools, planning, and data to find and reach specific audiences on TV is the most powerful way to combat audience fragmentation.
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
6
Table of Contents
AUTo INsUrANCe 9 Allstate Geico Progressive state Farm
bANkING 19Ally Financialbank of AmericaCapital oneCitigroup
beer 29bud lightCoors lightCorona extraHeineken
CANDY 39butterfingerHershey’s Chocolate barsnickers
CAsUAl DINING 47Applebee’sChili’solive Garden
CereAl 55Cheerios Frosted FlakesHoney bunches of oats
CreDIT CArDs 63American expressDiscover Visa
DePArTmeNT sTores 71kohl’smacy’sTargetWalmart
the reach problem on television is affecting TV advertisers across all industries
FINANCIAl serVICes 81e-TradePrudential FinancialTD Ameritrade
meN’s HYGIeNe 89Axe menDegree menold spice
oVer-THe-CoUNTer PHArmACeUTICAl 97AdvilAleveTylenol
PresCrIPTIoN PHArmACeUTICAl 105CentocorenbrelHumira
QUICk serVICe resTAUrANTs-PIzzA 113Domino’slittle CaesarsPapa John’s
QUICk serVICe resTAUrANT 121burger kingmcDonald’ssubway
seArCH eNGINes 129bingGoogle
soFT DrINks 135Coca-ColaDr Peppermountain Dew
WomeN’s HAIr ProDUCTs 143ClearGarnierPantene Pro-V
The charts on the following pages demonstrate the impact of audience fragmentation on campaign reach for all advertisers and industries, big and small.
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
7
AuTo INSuRANCe
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
8
$18,942,543 $20,860,268 $18,909,074 $14,214,475TV SPEND
20.4MM 22.5MM 18.5MM31.6MM
3.6MM
95.9MM 96.1MM 99.2MM 87.7MM
1.3MM2.2MM
0.6MM
AuDIeNCe ReACH IN MILLIoNS
120.0m
100.0m
80.0m
60.0m
40.0m
20.0m
0
UnduplicatedReach
DuplicatedReach
Unreached
ComPeTITIVe sHAre oF VoICe For AUTo INsUrANCeTArGeT: A25-54 TImING: oCT 2012
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
of the tv impressions went to
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
40%of the target
9
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
0.4%
6.9 %
0.2
3.0
6.9
10.6
22.9
15.8%
24.2%
52.7%
78%
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY AllsTATe’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-54 TImING: oCT 2012
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 18,942,543
CAmPAIGN: oCT 2012AUTo INsUrANCe
of the tv impressions went to
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
40%of the target
10
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
75%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 20,860,268
CAmPAIGN: oCT 2012AUTo INsUrANCe
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY GeICo’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-54TImING: oCT 2012
0.1
3.1
7.6
11.7
20.9
17.5%
7.1%
48.2%
27.1%
0.2%
of the tv impressions went to
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
40%of the target
11
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
81%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 18,913,292
CAmPAIGN: oCT 2012AUTo INsUrANCe
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY ProGressIVe’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-54TImING: oCT 2012
0.4
4.6
11.5
20.6
50.8
0.4%
5.3%
13.1%
23.4%
57.8%
of the tv impressions went to
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
40%of the target
12
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 14,214,475
CAmPAIGN: oCT 2012 AUTo INsUrANCe
81%
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY sTATe FArm’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-54TImING: oCT 2012
0.0
0.7
4.3
7.9
15.7
0.0%
4.7%
14.6%
27.0%
53.7%
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
13
BANKINg
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
14
$2,097,356 $17,646,745 $8,224,918 $22,538,849TV SPEND
106.6MM
42.6MM
4.7MM
101.6MM
52.3MM 34.5MM
0.4MM
41.8MM
2.3MM
94.2MM
8.4MM
105.9MM
AuDIeNCe ReACH IN MILLIoNS
140.0m
120.0m
100.0m
80.0m
60.0m
40.0m
20.0m
0
ComPeTITIVe sHAre oF VoICe For bANkINGTArGeT: A18-54 TImING: DeC 2012
UnduplicatedReach
DuplicatedReach
Unreached
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
15
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
100%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 2,097,356
CAmPAIGN: DeC 2012rAIse YoUr rATe: CoNsUmer CDs
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY AllY FINANCIAl’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-54TImING: DeC 2012
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
2.9
0.0%
0.0%
83.3%
0.0%
16.4%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
16
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
79%
CAmPAIGN: DeC 2012bANkAmerICArD CAsH reWArDs: PersoNAl CreDIT CArD
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 17,646,754
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY bANk oF AmerICA’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-54TImING: DeC 2012
0.0
0.5
4.0
6.7
11.8
4.6%
50.2%
16.9%
28.4%
0.0%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
17
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
81%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 8,224,918
CAmPAIGN: DeC 2012CAPITAl oNe CAsH reWArDs:PersoNAl CreDIT CArD
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY CAPITAl oNe’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-54TImING: DeC 2012
0.0
0.3
2.9
5.3
9.9
3.7%
52.9%
15.4%
28.0%
0.0%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
18
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
76%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 22,538,849
CAmPAIGN: DeC 2012CITIbANk: PersoNAl CreDIT CArD
0.0
3.0
7.7
11.9
21.6
6.7%
48.9%
17.5%
0.1%
26.8%
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY CITIbANk’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-54TImING: DeC 2012
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
19
BeeR
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
20
$26,113,111 $17,295,898 $12,194,249 $7,675,216TV SPEND
11.0MM 11.9MM
0.4MM
13.5MM 13.2MM
0.8MM
16.2MM 15.7MM 14.3MM 12.9MM
0.3MM 2.0MM
25.0m
20.0m
15.0m
10.0m
5.0m
0
AuDIeNCe ReACH IN MILLIoNS
ComPeTITIVe sHAre oF VoICe For beerTArGeT: m21-34 TImING: seP 2012
UnduplicatedReach
DuplicatedReach
Unreached
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
21
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
88%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 26,113,111
CAmPAIGN: seP 2012bUD lIGHT: beer
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY bUD lIGHT’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: m21-34TImING: seP 2012
0.0
0.0
3.1
7.7
16.1 59.9%
0.0%
28.6%
11.3%
0.2%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
22
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
90%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 17,295,898
CAmPAIGN: seP 2012Coors lIGHT: beer
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY Coors lIGHT’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: m21-34TImING: seP 2012
0.0
0.0
0.6
5.4
11.0
0.0%
29.5%
10.5%
0.0%
60.0%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
23
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
92%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 12,194,249
CAmPAIGN: seP 2012CoroNA eXTrA: ImPorTeD beer
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY CoroNA eXTrA’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: m21-34TImING: seP 2012
0.0
0.0
0.4
4.4
9.5
28.7%
0.0%
62.9%
8.4%
0.0%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
24
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
90%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 7,675,216
CAmPAIGN: seP 2012HeINekeN: ImPorTeD beer
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY HeINekeN’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: m21-34TImING: seP 2012
0.0
0.0
0.4
2.9
6.4 61.6 %
10.4 %
0.0%
28.0 %
0.0%
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
25
CANDy
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
26
TV SPEND
80.0m
70.0m
60.0m
50.0m
40.0m
30.0m
20.0m
10.0m
0
31.8MM
6.4MM
30.7MM
52.8MM
1.1MM
15.1MM
AuDIeNCe ReACH IN MILLIoNS
28.4MM
8.5MM
32.0MM
ComPeTITIVe sHAre oF VoICe For CANDYTArGeT: A18-34 TImING: AUG 2012
UnduplicatedReach
DuplicatedReach
Unreached
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
27
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
100%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 492,317
CAmPAIGN: AUG 2012bUTTerFINGer: CANDY bAr
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY bUTTerFINGer’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-34TImING: AUG 2012
0.0%
0.0%
4.7%
0.0%
95.4%
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
4.2
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
28
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
89%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 2,464,001
CAmPAIGN: AUG 2012HersHeY bAr: CANDY bAr
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY HersHeY’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-34TImING: AUG 2012
0.0
0.0
0.4
2.9
6.4
0.0%
61.5%
0.0%
11.3%
27.3%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
29
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
87%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 3,311,626
CAmPAIGN: AUG 2012sNICkers: CANDY bAr
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY sNICkers’ CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-34TImING: AUG 2012
0.0
0.0
0.6
3.5
8.9
0.0%
62.6%
0.0%
12.8%
24.6%
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
30
CASuAL DININg
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
31
TV SPEND
160.0m
140.0m
120.0m
100.0m
80.0m
60.0m
40.0m
20.0m
0
$12,236,658
45.3MM
6.2MM
97.5MM
$5,627,394
57.3MM
2.8MM
88.9MM
$11,808,056
36.4MM
102.6MM
10.0MM
AuDIeNCe ReACH IN MILLIoNS
ComPeTITIVe sHAre oF VoICe For CAsUAl DINING resTAUrANTTArGeT: A18-54 TImING: seP 2012
UnduplicatedReach
DuplicatedReach
Unreached
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
32
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
84%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 12,236,658
CAmPAIGN: seP 2012APPlebees NeIGHborHooD GrIll & bAr: CAsUAl DINING resTAUrANT
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY APPlebee’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-54TImING: seP 2012
0.0
0.4
4.0
7.7
16.9
13.6%
2.8%
57.4%
26.2%
0.0%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
33
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
82%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 5,627,394
CAmPAIGN: seP 2012CHIlIs GrIll & bAr resTAUrANT: CAsUAl DINING resTAUrANT
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY CHIlI’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-54TImING: seP 2012
0.0
0.0
2.1
3.3
6.8
0.7%
55.1%
17.0%
27.2%
0.0%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
34
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
77%
CAmPAIGN: seP 2012olIVe GArDeN resTAUrANT: ITAlIAN resTAUrANT
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 11,808,056
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY olIVe GArDeN’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-54TImING: seP 2012
0.0
0.9
4.3
7.2
13.5 50.4%
27.0%
0.0%
6.4%
16.2%
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
35
CeReAL
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
36
TV SPEND
140.0m
120.0m
100.0m
80.0m
60.0m
40.0m
20.0m
0
49.8MM
61.6MM
8.5MM
$4,429,727
48.0MM
13.4MM
$1,246,816
68.0MM
3.7MM
AuDIeNCe ReACH IN MILLIoNS
58.6MM 48.3MM
ComPeTITIVe sHAre oF VoICe For CereAlTArGeT: A25-54 TImING: oCT 2012
UnduplicatedReach
DuplicatedReach
Unreached
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
37
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
87%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 2,617,145
CAmPAIGN: oCT 2012CHeerIos: CereAl
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY CHeerIos’ CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-54TImING: oCT 2012
0.0
0.0
0.6
3.4
8.6 62.2%
13.3%
24.4%
0.0%
0.0%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
38
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
83%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 4,429,727
CAmPAIGN: oCT 2012FrosTeD FlAkes: CereAl
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY FrosTeD FlAkes’ CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-54TImING: oCT 2012
0.0
0.0
0.6
3.0
6.6
16.6%
26.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
39
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
98%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 1,246,816
CAmPAIGN: oCT 2012HoNeY bUNCHes oF oATs: CereAl
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY HoNeY bUNCHes oF oATs’ CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-54TImING: oCT 2012
0.0
0.0
0.1
2.1
6.8 74.5%
0.0%
0.0%
23.4%
2.1%
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
40
CReDIT CARDS
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
41
TV SPEND $11,688,056
66.8MM
2.9MM
87.4MM
$7,102,115
35.3MM
16.5MM
105.3MM
$17,116,159
58.0MM
5.5MM
93.6MM
180.0m
160.0m
140.0m
120.0m
100.0m
80.0m
70.0m
60.0m
40.0m
20.0m
0
AuDIeNCe ReACH IN MILLIoNS
ComPeTITIVe sHAre oF VoICe For CreDIT CArDsTArGeT: A25-64 TImING: NoV 2012
UnduplicatedReach
DuplicatedReach
Unreached
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
42
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
89%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 11,688,056
CAmPAIGN: NoV 2012AmerICAN eXPress: PersoNAl CreDIT CArD
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY AmerICAN eXPress’ CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-64TImING: NoV 2012
0.0
0.0
0.6
3.1
10.4
0.0%
10.9%
0.0%
20.3%
68.8%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
43
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
79%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 7,102,115
CAmPAIGN: NoV 2012DIsCoVer CArD: PersoNAl CreDIT CArD
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY DIsCoVer’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-64TImING: NoV 2012
0.0
0.8
4.6
8.0
15.2
5.6%
15.7%
0.0%
27.2%
51.5%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
44
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
83%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 17,116,159
CAmPAIGN: NoV 2012VIsA: PersoNAl CreDIT CArD
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY VIsA’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-64TImING: NoV 2012
0.0
0.1
2.3
4.0
7.7
1.2%
15.9%
0.0%
28.3%
54.5%
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
45
DePARTMeNT SToReS
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
46
TV SPEND
120.0m
100.0m
80.0m
60.0m
40.0m
20.0m
0
AuDIeNCe ReACH IN MILLIoNS
$19,598,027$18,591,333
18.7MM
2.4MM
98.9MM
$25,104,558
25.1MM
93.4MM
1.5MM
$9,475,025
37.4MM
0.6MM
82.0MM
ComPeTITIVe sHAre oF VoICe For DePArTmeNT sToresTArGeT: A25-54 TImING: DeC 2012
UnduplicatedReach
DuplicatedReach
Unreached
19.1MM
2.6MM
98.3MM
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
47
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
81%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 25,104,558
CAmPAIGN: DeC 2012koHls DePArTmeNT sTore: sAles ANNoUNCemeNT
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY koHl’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-54TImING: DeC 2012
0.0
1.2
6.5
11.5
25.5
5.2%
14.2%
0.0%
25.0%
55.6%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
48
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
76%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 18,591,333
CAmPAIGN: DeC 2012mACYs DePArTmeNT sTore: sAles ANNoUNCemeNT
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY mACY’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-54TImING: DeC 2012
0.3
4.0
8.6
13.7
27.0
7.5%
16.0%
0.6 %
25.5%
50.4%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
49
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
80%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 9,475,025
CAmPAIGN: DeC 2012TArGeT DIsCoUNT DePArTmeNT sTore:sAles ANNoUNCemeNT
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY TArGeT’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-54TImING: DeC 2012
0.0
0.4
4.3
7.2
13.5
3.2%
16.5%
0.0%
27.9%
52.4%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
50
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
74%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 19,598,027
CAmPAIGN: DeC 2012WAlmArT DIsCoUNT DePArTmeNT sTore: PHoNes & eQUIPmeNT
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY WAlmArT’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-54TImING: DeC 2012
0.3
3.8
7.6
11.6
22.3
8.3%
16.7%
0.6%
25.4%
49.0%
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
51
FINANCIAL SeRVICeS
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
52
TV SPEND
100.0m
90.0m
80.0m
70.0m
60.0m
50.0m
40.0m
30.0m
20.0m
10.0m
0
AuDIeNCe ReACH IN MILLIoNS
$8,100,314
34.3MM
17.7MM
40.8MM
$5,497,134
57.3MM
3.4MM
32.0MM
$4,185,840
60.8MM
2.5MM
29.4MM
ComPeTITIVe sHAre oF VoICe For FINANCIAl serVICesTArGeT: A25-50 TImING: seP 2012
UnduplicatedReach
DuplicatedReach
Unreached
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
53
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
82%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 8,100,314
CAmPAIGN: seP 2012e TrADe: FINANCIAl: oNlINe
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY e-TrADe’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-50TImING: seP 2012
0.0
0.1
2.1
3.3
7.0
1.0%
17.1%
0.0%
26.3%
55.6%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
54
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
93%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 5,497,134
CAmPAIGN: seP 2012PrUDeNTIAl FINANCIAl: reTIremeNT PlANNING serVICes
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY PrUDeNTIAl FINANCIAl’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-50TImING: seP 2012
0.0
0.0
0.2
2.6
6.4
0.0%
7.5%
0.0%
26.9%
65.6%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
55
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
97%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 4,185,840
CAmPAIGN: seP 2012TD AmerITrADe brokerAGe: reTIremeNT PlANNING serVICes
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY TD AmerITrADe’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-50TImING: seP 2012
0.0
0.0
0.1
1.8
4.9
0.0%
2.8%
0.0%
26.2%
70.9%
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
56
MeN’S HygIeNe
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
57
TV SPEND
70.0m
60.0m
50.0m
40.0m
30.0m
20.0m
10.0m
0
AuDIeNCe ReACH IN MILLIoNS
$1,119,984
45.5MM
2.5MM
15.3MM
$1,394,696
41.8MM
5.3MM
$3,312,615
33.6MM
10.8MM
16.2MM 18.9MM
UnduplicatedReach
DuplicatedReach
Unreached
ComPeTITIVe sHAre oF VoICe For AUTo INsUrANCeTArGeT: A25-54 TImING: oCT 2012
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
58
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 1,119,984
100%
CAmPAIGN: oCT 2012AXe: DANDrUFF sHAmPoo
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY AXe’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: m18-49TImING: oCT 2012
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
3.2
15.2%
84.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
59
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 1,394,696
100%
CAmPAIGN: oCT 2012DeGree: ClINICAl ProTeCTIoN: solID ANTIPersPIrANT/DeoDorANT
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY DeGree’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: m18-49TImING: oCT 2012
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
3.8
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
23.3%
76.7%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
60
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
95%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 3,312,615
CAmPAIGN: oCT 2012olD sPICe: olD sPICe: CHAmPIoN
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY olD sPICe’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: m18-49TImING: oCT 2012
0.0
0.0
0.2
2.7
6.6
0.0%
4.7%
0.0%
27.4%
68.0%
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
61
oVeR-THe-CouNTeR PHARMACeuTICALS
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
62
ComPeTITIVe sHAre oF VoICe For oVer-THe-CoUNTer PHArmACeUTICAlsTArGeT: A18-54 TImING: DeC 2012
TV SPEND
160.0m
140.0m
120.0m
100.0m
80.0m
60.0m
40.0m
20.0m
0
AuDIeNCe ReACH IN MILLIoNS
$4,250,458
61.4MM
11.6MM
75.8MM
$3,081,816
66.3MM
12.0MM
70.5MM
$2,073,697
69.1MM
8.2MM
71.5MM
UnduplicatedReach
DuplicatedReach
Unreached
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
63
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
87%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 3,081,816
CAmPAIGN: DeC 2012ADVIl: PAIN relIeVer TAbleTsADVIl Pm: PAIN relIeVer CAPleTs
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY ADVIl’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-54TImING: DeC 2012
0.0
0.0
0.4
2.8
6.2
0.0%
12.8%
0.0%
27.0%
60.3%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
64
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
88%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 4,250,458
CAmPAIGN: DeC 2012AleVe: PAIN relIeVer CAPleTs
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY AleVe’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-54TImING: DeC 2012
0.0
0.0
0.6
3.8
9.8
0.0%
12.2%
0.0%
24.5%
63.3%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
65
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
91%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 2,073,697
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY TYleNol’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-54TImING: DeC 2012
0.0
0.0
0.4
2.9
8.0
0.0%
9.4%
0.0%
24.2%
66.3%
CAmPAIGN: DeC 2012TYleNol: ColD mUlTI-sYmPTom NIGHTIme: ColD remeDY lIQUIDTYleNol: ColD mUlTI-sYmPTom: WArmING lIQUID
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
66
PReSCRIPTIoN PHARMACeuTICAL
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
67
ComPeTITIVe sHAre oF VoICe For PresCrIPTIoN PHArmACeUTICAlsTArGeT: A25-54 TImING: DeC 2012
TV SPEND
140.0m
120.0m
100.0m
80.0m
60.0m
40.0m
20.0m
0
AuDIeNCe ReACH IN MILLIoNS
$9,857,436
51.6MM
8.2MM
60.1MM
$2,041,767
79.4MM
1.9MM
38.7MM
UnduplicatedReach
DuplicatedReach
Unreached
$11,407,406
39.7MM
15.9MM
64.4MM
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
68
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
100%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 2,041,767
CAmPAIGN: DeC 2012sTelArA: PlAQUe PsorIAsIs rX
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY CeNToCor’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-54TImING: DeC 2012
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
4.9
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
19.8%
80.2%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
69
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
87%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 9,857,436
CAmPAIGN: DeC 2012 eNbrel: PlAQUe PsorIAsIs rXeNbrel: PsorIATIC ArTHrITIs rX
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY eNbrel’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-54
0.0
0.0
0.5
3.0
8.0
0.0%
12.6%
0.0%
24.0%
63.4%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
70
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
82%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 11,407,406
CAmPAIGN: DeC 2012HUmIrA: CroHNs DIseAse rXHUmIrA: PlAQUe PsorIAsIs rXHUmIrA: rHeUmAToID ArTHrITIs rX
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY HUmIrA’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A25-54
0.0
0.2
2.6
4.9
9.4
2.6%
15.0%
0.0%
28.3%
54.1%
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
71
QuICK SeRVICe ReSTAuRANTS - PIZZA
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
72
ComPeTITIVe sHAre oF VoICe For QUICk serVICe resTAUrANTs – PIzzATArGeT: A18-49 TImING: oCT 2012
TV SPEND
160.0m
140.0m
120.0m
100.0m
80.0m
60.0m
40.0m
20.0m
0
AuDIeNCe ReACH IN MILLIoNS
29.4MM
16.1MM
80.1MM
53.1MM
2.5MM
$3,641,461$5,393,992
52.9MM
2.9MM UnduplicatedReach
DuplicatedReach
Unreached
69.7MM 69.9MM
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
73
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 14,663,307
CAmPAIGN: oCT 2012DomINos HAND mADe PAN PIzzA: PIzzA ProDUCT
89%
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY DomINo’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-49TImING: oCT 2012
0.0
1.0
5.4
9.3
18.6
5.6%
15.4%
0.0%
26.4%
52.7%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
74
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 3,641,467
CAmPAIGN: oCT 2012lITTle CAesArs HoT-N-reADY PIzzA: PIzzA ProDUCT
89%
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY lITTle CAesArs’ CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-49TImING: oCT 2012
0.0
0.0
0.6
4.2
10.5
0.0%
11.1%
0.0%
25.4%
63.5%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
75
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
86%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 5,393,992
CAmPAIGN: oCT 2012PAPA JoHNs PIzzA resTAUrANT: oNlINe
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY PAPA JoHN’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-49TImING: oCT 2012
0.0
0.0
0.6
3.6
7.8
0.0%
13.8%
0.0%
26.9%
59.3%
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
76
QuICK SeRVICe ReSTAuRANT
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
77
TV SPEND
140.0m
120.0m
100.0m
80.0m
60.0m
40.0m
20.0m
0
AuDIeNCe ReACH IN MILLIoNS
$15,708,499
26.6MM
2.9MM
120.9MM
$14,857,557
30.3MM
2.7MM
117.4MM
$30,415,407
25.8MM
3.4MM
121.2MM
ComPeTITIVe sHAre oF VoICe For QUICk serVICe resTAUrANTsTArGeT: A18-54 TImING: JUl 2012
UnduplicatedReach
DuplicatedReach
Unreached
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
78
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
79%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 14,857,557
CAmPAIGN: JUl 2012bUrGer kING bk CroWN meAl: kIDs meAlbUrGer kING CArolINA bbQ CHICkeN sANDWICH & TX bbQ CHICkeN sANDWICHbUrGer kING CHICkeN sANDWICHbUrGer kING ICeebUrGer kING ICee & bUrGer kING sWeeT PoTATo FrIes sIDe orDerbbQ PUlleD Pork sANDWICHbUrGer kING sWeeT PoTATo FrIes sIDe orDer& TX bbQ WHoPPer bUrGer GeNerAl PromoTIoNmUlTI Qsr ProDUCTs
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY bUrGer kING’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-54TImING: JUl 2012
0.0
1.6
8.7
14.5
30.0
5.6%
15.3%
0.0%
25.8%
53.3%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
79
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
74%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 30,415,407
CAmPAIGN: JUl 2012CorPorATe PromoTIoNGeNerAl PromoTIoN – QsrmCDoNAlDs FAVorITes UNDer 400 meNU: VAlUe meNUmCDoNAlDs mCCAFe FrAPPemCDoNAlDs mCCAFe reAl FrUIT smooTHIesmUlTI Qsr ProDUCTs
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY mCDoNAlD’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-54TImING: JUl 2012
0.2
3.9
8.6
12.9
23.0
8.0%
17.7%
0.4%
26.5%
47.4%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
80
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
78%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 15,708,499
CAmPAIGN: JUl 2012 - GeNerAl PromoTIoN – Qsr - sUbWAY bACoN eGG & CHeese FlATbreADsUbWAY bUFFAlo CHICkeN - sUbWAY CHIPoTle CHeese sTeAk sANDWICH - CHIPoTle sTeAk & CHeese - sUbWAY ClUb, sUbWAY ClUb & UlTImATe VeGGIe - sUbWAY FooTloNG sUbs, sUbWAY FresH FIT meAls For kIDs, sUbWAY FUze FresH breWeD ICeD TeA - sUbWAY TUrkeY AVoCADo sANDWICH - sUbWAY TUrkeY AVoCADo & UlTImATe VeGGIe - sUbWAY TUrkeY & bACoN AVoCADo, sUbWAY TUrkeY breAsT sUb, VArIoUs sANDWICH ProDUCTs
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY sUbWAY’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-54TImING: JUl 2012
0.2
3.7
8.8
14.4
29.6
6.5%
15.5%
0.3%
25.4%
52.4%
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
81
SeARCH eNgINeS
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
82
71.9MM
42.6MM
13.4MM
TV SPEND
140.0m
120.0m
100.0m
80.0m
60.0m
40.0m
20.0m
0
AuDIeNCe ReACH IN MILLIoNS
$1,762,338
105.6MM
8.8MM
13.4MM
UnduplicatedReach
DuplicatedReach
Unreached
ComPeTITIVe sHAre oF VoICe For seArCH eNGINesTArGeT: A18-49 TImING: DeC 2012
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
83
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
100%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 1,762,338
CAmPAIGN: DeC 2012bING.Com: oNlINe
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY bING’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-49TImING: DeC 2012
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
84
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
96%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 6,366,506
CAmPAIGN: DeC 2012GooGle CHrome: soFTWAre
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY GooGle’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A18-49TImING: DeC 2012
0.0
0.0
0.1
1.9
3.9
0.0%
3.5%
0.0%
31.1%
65.4%
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
85
SoFT DRINKS
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
86
TV SPEND
200.0m
180.0m
160.0m
140.0m
120.0m
100.0m
80.0m
60.0m
40.0m
20.0m
0
AuDIeNCe ReACH IN MILLIoNS
89.6MM
25.7MM
59.2MM
$3,437,621
89.6MM
13.0MM
71.9MM
$2,751,063
93.4MM
9.1MM
72.1MM
ComPeTITIVe sHAre oF VoICe For soFT DrINksTArGeT: A12-54 TImING: JUl 2012
UnduplicatedReach
DuplicatedReach
Unreached
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
87
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
94%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 10,296,780
CAmPAIGN: JUl 2012CoCA-ColA ClAssIC: soFT DrINk
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY CoCA-ColA’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A12-54TImING: JUl 2012
0.0
0.0
0.2
2.8
6.3
0.0%
6.5%
0.0%
28.4%
65.1%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
88
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
94%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 2,751,063
CAmPAIGN: JUl 2012Dr PePPer: soFT DrINk
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY Dr PePPer’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A12-54TImING: JUl 2012
0.0
0.0
0.1
2.0
4.7
0.0%
5.6%
0.0%
28.6%
65.8%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
89
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
CAmPAIGN: JUl 2012moUNTAIN DeW: soFT DrINk
95%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 3,437,621
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY moUNTAIN DeW’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: A12-54TImING: JUl 2012
0.0
0.0
0.2
2.9
7.8
0.0%
5.5%
0.0%
25.5%
69.0%
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
90
WoMeN’S HAIR PRoDuCTS
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
91
TV SPEND
120.0m
100.0m
80.0m
60.0m
40.0m
20.0m
0
AuDIeNCe ReACH IN MILLIoNS
$1,370,660
68.5MM
43.1MM
4.7MM
$3,696,562
49.9MM
15.0MM
51.4MM
$1,726,390
60.3MM
8.0MM
CLeAR
48.0MM
ComPeTITIVe sHAre oF VoICe For WomeN HAIr-ProDUCTsTArGeT: W18+ TImING: AUG 2012
UnduplicatedReach
DuplicatedReach
Unreached
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
92
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
CAmPAIGN: AUG 2012sCAlP & HAIr THerAPY: sHAmPoo & CoNDITIoNer
99%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 1,726,390
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY CleAr’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: W18+TImING: AUG 2012
0.0
0.0
0.2
2.3
6.6
0.0%
5.5%
0.0%
24.6%
69.8%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
93
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
CAmPAIGN: AUG 2012GArNIer FrUCTIs FAll FIGHT: sHAmPoo
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 1,370,660
99%
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY GArNIer’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: W18+TImING: AUG 2012
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.8
4.7
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
27.8%
71.3%
Average Frequency per Viewer Quintile
Percent of Impressions per Viewer Quintile
80%60%40%20%
100%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
40%
94
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
oF THe TV ImPressIoNs WeNT To
40%oF THe TArGeT
CAmPAIGN: AUG 2012PANTeNe Pro-V moIsTUre reNeWAl: sHAmPoo & CoNDITIoNer
85%
TV CAmPAIGN sPeND
$ 3,696,562
AUDIeNCe reACHeD bY PANTeNe Pro-V’s CAmPAIGN TArGeT: W18+TImING: AUG 2012
0.0
0.0
0.5
2.6
6.0
0.0%
0.0%
14.8%
25.5%
59.8%
Source: Nielsen, Kantar Media Intelligence and Simulmedia a7 ® July-Dec 2012
95
All trademarks, logos, or brands referenced herein are registered to and are the property of their respective owners. “The book of reach” is an independent publication of simulmedia and has not been authorized, sponsored, endorsed, or approved by, and simulmedia is not affiliated with the respective owners of such trademarks, logos, and brands.
About Simulmediasimulmedia, Inc. operates the simulmedia Audience Network, the world’s first data-driven audience network for television. The company’s targeting platform leverages predictive technologies and anonymous viewing data from more than 50 million Us TV viewers to help national advertisers and their agencies better reach their target audiences and better measure the results. simulmedia aggregates TV audiences through partnerships with TV system operators and national networks reaching all 115 million Us TV households. by using simulmedia to extend reach, clients ensure their message is seen and understood by more potential clients.
To learn more visit www.simulmedia.comor e-mail us at [email protected]