Simulation of continuous and surge flow irrigation … · viabilite´ de la me´thode des deux...
Transcript of Simulation of continuous and surge flow irrigation … · viabilite´ de la me´thode des deux...
IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE
Irrig. and Drain. 54: 217–230 (2005)
Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/ird.168
SIMULATION OF CONTINUOUS AND SURGE FLOW IRRIGATION UNDERSHORT FIELD CONDITIONSy
SALEH M. ISMAIL1 AND HERMAN DEPEWEG2*1 Soil and Water Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
2 Department of Water Engineering, UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands
ABSTRACT
This paper describes the simulation results for continuous and surge flow irrigation under short field conditions by
the computer model SIRMOD III in order to evaluate the performance and applicability of the model for short
furrows and to investigate the viability of the two-point method for calculating infiltration parameters under
continuous and surge flow irrigation in short fields. These specific field conditions are found on farms smaller than
1 ha and with a furrow length of 70m. To evaluate the model a series of experiments has been carried out in two
locations in Egypt and in one site in the Netherlands. The experiments in Egypt were conducted on a field with clay
soil situated at the Agriculture Experimental Station, Assiut University, and on a sandy soil field located at the
Assiut University Experimental Station for Desert Land, El-Wadi El-Assuity, Assiut. The experiments in the
Netherlands were carried out at the Tunnel Experimental Setting of the Irrigation and Water Engineering Group of
Wageningen University. The tunnel was covered as a greenhouse to protect the investigations against the external
weather conditions, especially rainfall. Two soil types were available inside the tunnel, namely sandy clay and
sandy clay loam. All the experiments were carried out in furrows with a blocked end and their length and width
were 70 and 0.70m, respectively.
Measured field data were used to evaluate the computer model SIRMOD III. The results of the evaluation
indicated that the model can accurately simulate continuous and surge flow irrigation under short field conditions
for the measured infiltration parameters. These field data are very important for a good simulation of the advance
time and consequently the infiltration. The two-point method can be successfully used to obtain the infiltration
parameters for continuous and surge flow irrigation under short field conditions and for different soil types.
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
key words: SIRMOD; simulation; furrows; surge flow; short field conditions
RESUME
Cet article presente les resultats de simulation de l’irrigation en continu et par intermittence en situation de
parcelles reduites par le programme SIRMOD III (Surface Irrigation Computer Simulation Model). Le but est
d’evaluer les performances et l’applicabilite du modele dans le cas des raies d’irrigation courtes, et d’evaluer la
viabilite de la methode des deux points pour calculer les parametres d’infiltration en condition d’irrigation
gravitaire en continu et en intermittence sur de petites parcelles. Ces conditions specifiques sont rencontrees dans
des parcelles de moins d’un hectare et dont la longueur des raies est de 70m comme c’est le cas en Egypte. Afin
d’evaluer le modele, une serie d’experimentations a ete conduite dans deux sites en Egypte et dans un site aux
Pays-Bas. Les sites en Egypte sont la station d’experimentation agricole de l’Universite d’Asyut, avec un sol de
type argileux, et la station experimentale des zones arides de l’Universite El-Wadi El-Assuity, Asyut, avec un sol
Received 3 March 2004
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Accepted 10 February 2005
*Correspondence to: H. Depeweg, Department of Water Engineering, UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, PO Box 3015, 2601DADelft, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] simulation de l’irrigation en continu et par intermittence en situation de parcelles reduites.
de type sablonneux. Les experimentations au Pays-Bas ont ete conduites dans le tunnel experimental de
l’Universite de Wageningen, au Departement d’Irrigation. Le tunnel est couvert comme une serre pour l’isoler
des conditions climatiques exterieures, principalement la pluie. Deux types de sol, l’un a texture sablo-argileuse et
l’autre a texture sablo-argilo-limoneuse, ont ete utilises dans le tunnel.
Les raies, avec une longueur de 70m et une largeur de 0.70m, ont ete fermees a leurs bouts. Les donnees
mesurees sur les sites ont ete utilisees pour evaluer le modele.
Les resultats indiquent qu’a partir des donnees d’infiltration mesurees, SIRMOD III realise une bonne
simulation de l’irrigation en continu et par intermittence sur des parcelles de dimensions reduites. Il est
recommande d’utiliser les parametres d’infiltration mesures comme donnees pour le modele SIRMOD afin
d’obtenir la meilleure simulation du temps de progression de la lame d’eau et par consequent de l’infiltration. La
methode des deux points pourrait etre utilisee efficacement pour calculer les parametres d’infiltration pour
l’irrigation gravitaire en continu et en intermittence sur de petites parcelles et pour differents types de sol.
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
mots cles: SIRMOD; simulation; raies; par intermittence; parcelles reduites
INTRODUCTION
Surge flow irrigation is the intermittent application of water to furrows in a series of relatively short on and off time
periods, which usually vary from about 5 minutes to several hours. With this technique water is applied
intermittently rather than with a continuous stream, as in conventional surface irrigation. The main objective of
surge flow irrigation is to improve the application efficiency by reducing deep percolation and runoff losses and to
obtain a uniform wetting of the root zone, with minor differences in the infiltration depth at the beginning and the
end of a furrow. Surge flow irrigation has been introduced in farms characterized by large sizes and long furrows.
Research indicates that surge flow irrigation helps to increase application efficiency and to improve crop
production. Guidelines about the proper stream size, initial on-time and cut-back phase for using surge flow
irrigation in long fields have been established (Ismail, 2003).
Computer models have been used for quite some time to simulate continuous irrigation in furrow, border and
basin irrigation. New versions of these models include the possibilities to simulate surge flow irrigation as they
consider the unique features of surge flow irrigation such as spatially and temporally varying infiltration, flow over
a wet–dry interface, simultaneous advance and recession, cycle time and cycle ratio of the surges. Blair et al.
(1984) compared two models based on the Kostiakov equation for predicting the surge flow phenomena, namely
the step function model and the cycle ratio time model. The main difference between the two surge flow models is
that the step function model assumes that the total reduction in effective infiltration resulting from surge flow
irrigation occurs during the first off-period; whereas the cycle ratio time model assumes that the reduction occurs
during each off-period, but the amount of reduction decreases with each successive off-period. Verification of the
models with field data shows that the step function model consistently underpredicts the cumulative infiltration;
while the cycle ratio time model is not a function of the basic infiltration rate. The results based on field data
indicate that the models appear to have general applicability in surge flow irrigation analysis.
Three other, but also general, models have emerged as being satisfactory, namely the zero inertia model (Purkey
and Wallender, 1988), the hydrodynamic model (Walker and Skogerboe, 1987) and the kinematic wave model
(Blair and Smerdon, 1987); the latter has become the standard for simulating surge flow irrigation in furrows
(Stringham, 1988). The SIRMOD III software package comprises all these three models and the viability of the
model to simulate surge flow irrigation with long furrows has been proven in the United States by Walker and
Humpherys (1983), for Bulgarian conditions by Popova (2000) and for Australian conditions by Hornbuckle et al.
(2003).
However, under short field conditions that are found on farms characterized by a small size (0.5–0.8 ha) and
short furrow length (less than 100m), the effects of surge flow irrigation are still not well known. The focus of
218 S. M. ISMAIL AND H. DEPEWEG
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Irrig. and Drain. 54: 217–230 (2005)
recent investigations has been the study of the applicability of surge flow irrigation for water saving and a uniform
wetting of the root zone under these short field conditions. The aim of this paper is to assess the viability of the
SIRMOD III model to simulate surge flow irrigation phenomena under short field conditions and to investigate the
viability of the two-point method for obtaining the infiltration parameters under continuous and surge flow
irrigation in short fields. The hydrodynamic model of SIRMOD III has been used to simulate surge flow irrigation
under the specific research conditions of short furrows with a blocked end, as the kinematic wave model in
SIRMOD III cannot simulate this type of surge flow irrigation.
THE SIRMOD MODEL
The SIRMOD III model (Walker, 2003) simulates the hydraulics of three surface irrigation methods, namely
border, basin and furrow irrigation. Moreover it can simulate furrow irrigation under surge flow conditions. The
simulation routine used in SIRMOD III is based on the numerical solution of the de Saint-Venant equations
(Hornbuckle et al., 2003), which consist of the conservation of mass (continuity) and the momentum equations.
An approximation of these equations was developed by rewriting them in an integral form and by a numerical
integration by using weighted averages. The integral can be defined in either the Lagrangian coordinate system,
which describes the flow by a cell that moves at an average flow velocity and deforms as it moves (Elliot et al.,
1982; Wallender and Rayej, 1990), or in the Eulerian coordinate system, which consists of a space-time
solution grid (Walker and Skogerboe, 1987; Bautista and Wallender, 1992; Tabuada et al., 1995). The last
approach was followed in the hydrodynamic model for the conservation of mass and momentum as described
by Walker and Skogerboe (1987). A detailed description of the mathematical model is presented by Walker
(2003).
The ability of the SIRMOD III model to predict the advance and performance of surge flow irrigation largely
depends on the input parameters. The most important parameters are the infiltration rate, field length, inflow rate
and cycle on-time; all these have been carefully measured in the field. Relatively large variations in these
parameters result in relatively big changes in performance. The other parameters include the furrow slope,
roughness and area of the cross-section. They have a relatively small influence on the performance of surge flow
irrigation.
The two-point method (Elliott and Walker, 1982) has been used to determine the infiltration parameters for the
SIRMOD III model. Several researchers (Elliott et al., 1982; Levien and Souza, 1987; Singh and He, 1988) employ
the Kostiakov-Lewis equation to calculate the amount of water infiltrated. In a furrow section where the discharge
is relatively constant from surge to surge, infiltration can be evaluated by the following two equations (Walker and
Humpherys, 1983):
Z ¼ k�a þ f0� ð1Þ
Zs ¼ k0�a0 þ f 00� ð2Þ
in which Z and Zs represent the volume of infiltrated water per unit furrow length (m3m�1) for dry, continuous and
wet, intermittent flow conditions, respectively. The parameters k; k0; a; a0; f and f 0 are the empirical parameters
that are specific for the soil type and the effect of cycled wetting and drying. For Equation (2) the opportunity time
� is cumulative over all the surges applied.
The flow rate in a dry furrow section wetted by the first surge is substantially lower than the flow that will occur
in that section during succeeding surges. Field observations indicate that the infiltration can be described by
Equation (1) for the dry section, Equation (2) for the third and succeeding surges, and by a transition equation
between Equations (1) and (2) for the second surge. Letting �xxi�2 and �xxi�1 be the advance distance of the ‘i� 2’ and
‘i� 1’ surges, the transition equation is written as
T ¼ �xxi�1 � x
�xxi�1 � �xxi�2
� ��
; �xxi�2 � x � �xxi�1; T ¼ 0; x < �xxi�2 or x > �xxi�1 ð3Þ
SIMULATION OF CONTINUOUS AND SURGE FLOW IRRIGATION UNDER SHORT FIELD CONDITIONS 219
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Irrig. and Drain. 54: 217–230 (2005)
in which x is the location of the computational point of interest during the current time step i and � is an empirical
nonlinear distribution constant. Then the infiltration coefficients for the transition infiltration equation can be
presented as
k00 ¼ k þ ðk � k0ÞT ð4Þ
d00 ¼ aþ ða� a0ÞT ð5Þ
f 00 ¼ f þ ðf � f 0ÞT ð6ÞIn order to provide a nonlinear transition, the value of the exponent � in Equation (3) can range from 2 to 5; a
value of 3 was used in this research. Infiltration equations such as Equation (1) are based on the cumulative
opportunity time. The infiltrated volume supplied by a particular surge must be computed as a difference. For
instance, if at point x the opportunity time prior to the ongoing surge is ��� and the opportunity time created by the
present surge is � , then the infiltration volume added during the present surge is
ZðtÞ ¼ Zð��� þ �Þ � Zð���Þ ð7Þ
DESCRIPTION OF THE EXPERIMENTS
Field experiments were carried out in Egypt and the Netherlands. One site in Egypt was at the Agriculture
Experimental Station of Assiut University and the soil was a clay soil. Another location was at the Assiut
University Experimental Station for Desert Lands, El-Wadi El-Assuity, Assiut. The area was newly reclaimed and
has never been irrigated; the soil at that site was a sandy soil. The experiments in the Netherlands were carried out
at the Experimental Tunnel of the Irrigation and Water Engineering Group, Wageningen University. The tunnel
was covered as a greenhouse to protect the experiments against the external weather conditions, especially rainfall.
Two soil textures were available inside the tunnel, namely sandy clay and sandy clay loam soil. A detailed
description of the soil characteristics is presented in Table I.
The furrows in all the experiments had a blocked end, their length was 70m and their width 0.70m. The slope
was 0.0024mm�1 in the clay soil, 0.004mm�1 in the sandy soil in Egypt and 0.0058mm�1 in the sandy clay and
sandy clay loam soils in the Netherlands. To monitor the advance and recession phase, five observation points were
established along the furrows, namely at 0L; 1=4L; 1=2L; 3=4L, and 1L. The distance between two consecutive
points was 17.5m.
Table I. Soil physical characteristics of the four soil types
Characteristic Egypt Netherlands
Soil (1) Soil (2) Soil (3) Soil (4)
Particle size distributionSand (%) 22.7 87.2 48.28 55.04Clay (%) 53.0 5.3 45.89 33.42Silt (%) 24.3 7.5 5.83 11.54Texture grade Clay Sandy Sandy clay Sandy clay loamWilting point (%) 27.8 1.9 12.5 2.3Field capacity (%) 46.3 15.2 31.3 24.2Saturation % 61.0 20.8 49.0 42.3Saturated hydraulic conductivity (m day�1) 0.04 1.8 0.03 0.05Bulk density (kgm�3) 1.20 1.60 1.20 1.30
220 S. M. ISMAIL AND H. DEPEWEG
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Irrig. and Drain. 54: 217–230 (2005)
Selection of the experiments
The experiments included the following variables: discharge (Q), cycle time and cycle ratio.
Discharge. For each soil type one discharge has been used and the discharge was 0.74 l s�1 for clay soil,
1.0 l s�1 for sandy soil and 0.76 l s�1 for sandy clay and sandy clay loam soil. The discharge was conveyed from an
open channel with a constant head to the furrows via calibrated siphons. In Egypt a PVC pipeline with a diameter
of 10 cm conveyed the flow to the furrows in the sandy soil. Special orifices were used to get the required discharge.
The applied amount of water was not the same for all tests, but the total amount depended on the number of surges
which was needed to bring the water to the end of the furrow.
Cycle time. The cycle time is the total on- and off-time of one cycle. It was the same for all soil textures: 16 and
24 minutes. The water supply was cut off at the end of the first surge that advanced the water to the end of the
furrow.
Cycle ratio. The cycle ratio is the ratio of the on-time to the total cycle time. For the cycle time of 16 minutes
the cycle ratio was 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 and for the cycle time of 24 minutes the cycle ratio was 1/3, 1/2 and 2/3. Not all
cycle ratios have been used during the tests as some would give either the same result as continuous flow or the
advance becomes so short that the whole test would take a long time with too many surges that would be outside the
general recommendations for surge flow irrigation.
DETERMINATION OF INFILTRATION PARAMETERS
Measured infiltration parameters
The measured infiltration parameters for each soil type have been obtained by measuring the inflow and outflow
in one furrow until the outflow becomes constant. From the inflow and outflow the basic infiltration rate f0 has been
estimated as follows (Walker, 1989):
f0 ¼ Qin � Qout
Lð8Þ
where f0¼ basic infiltration rate (m3min�1m�1), Qin¼ inflow (l s�1), Qout¼ outflow (l s�1) and L¼ furrow length
(m).
The basic infiltration rate from Equation (8) was 0.00018m3min�1m�1 for clay soil, 0.00055m3min�1m�1 for
sandy soil, 0.0000686m3min�1m�1 for sandy-clay soil and 0.000339m3min�1m�1 for sandy-clay loam soil. Use
of these values in the two-point method (Elliott and Walker, 1982) resulted in the exponent a and the k-value in
m3min�a. The two-point method depends on the time required to advance the water to half of the furrow length
ðt0:5LÞ as well as on the time required to advance the water to the end of the furrow ðtLÞ. The two-point method has
been developed to determine the exponent a and the k-value for continuous flow in long furrows (more than 300m).
A detailed description of the method is given by Elliott and Walker (1982).
The application of the two-point method in short furrows and for surge flow irrigation is a completely new aspect
that has been investigated as part of the present study. Due to the short furrow length, the times t0:5L and tL are
different for each case and each soil type and consequently the exponent a and the k-values are not the same for
each case, but fluctuate with the surge effects that depend on the discharge, cycle time and cycle ratio. Values of the
exponent a and the k-values for the various cases are presented in Table II.
Selecting infiltration parameters from the SIRMOD default data
As explained previously, the two-point method mainly depends on the time required to advance the water to half
of the furrow length and to the end of the furrow. Hence, the values of the infiltration parameters for the same soil
are different for each case as the advance time fluctuates with the surge effects. From a practical point of view it is
SIMULATION OF CONTINUOUS AND SURGE FLOW IRRIGATION UNDER SHORT FIELD CONDITIONS 221
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Irrig. and Drain. 54: 217–230 (2005)
obvious that farmers or designers are not able to simulate and evaluate various surge flow irrigation cases on the
same soil as they do not have the required infiltration parameters from field measurements. Therefore, the present
research has also used the default values of the infiltration parameters given in SIRMOD for further evaluation.
These parameters are given by the United States Department of Agriculture for each intake family and they can be
found from the measured advance time for continuous flow for each soil type and discharge.
To select the proper infiltration parameters for a soil type, equations for furrow design as developed by the Soil
Conservation Service of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-SCS, 1986) were used. These
equations describe the relationship between furrow length, inflow rate, deep percolation, surface runoff and field
application efficiency for design values of application depth, soil intake rate, furrow slope and spacing. The water
intake per unit length is related to the wetted perimeter (the furrow surface in contact with the water). The intake
from a furrow is in both vertical and horizontal directions and the wetted perimeter has to be increased by an
empirical constant to account for the horizontal intake caused by the lateral component of the soil moisture
gradient (the adjusted wetted perimeter):
P ¼ 0:265� Q�n=S0:5� �0:425þ 0:227 ð9Þ
where n¼Manning coefficient, S¼ slope (mm�1), P¼wetted perimeter (m) and Q¼ inflow (l s�1).
The measured advance time, being the time required for the water to flow from the inlet to the end of the furrow,
was used to find the intake family by trial and error. For each furrow the following parameters were derived:
� Adjusted wetted perimeter P according to the SCS equations (Equation 9);
� Advance coefficient �, used in the SCS equations (Equation 10 or 11).
� ¼ gx
QS1=2ð10Þ
� ¼ gL
QS1=2ð11Þ
Table II. Measured infiltration parameters (f, a and k) for all tests
Soil type The Netherlands Soil type Egypt
Discharge Cycle time Cycle Exponent k-value Discharge Cycle time Cycle Exponent k-value(l s�1) (min) ratio a (m3min�a) (l s�1) (min) ratio a (m3min�a)
Sandy clay f¼ 0.0000686 Clay soil f¼ 0.000183soil
0.76 Continuous 0.45731 0.00444 0.74 Continuous 0.52649 0.00427
16 16 1/4 0.19472 0.013551/2 0.47284 0.00395 1/2 0.57596 0.002893/4 0.40583 0.00517 3/4 0.38398 0.00589
24 1/3 0.35560 0.00451 24 1/3 0.10189 0.009811/2 0.38565 0.00420 1/2 0.31616 0.00863
2/3 0.51322 0.00370
Sandy clay f¼ 0.000339 Sandy soil f¼ 0.00055loam soil
0.76 Continuous 0.30858 0.00474 1.0 Continuous 0.44340 0.00435
16 1/2 0.24784 0.02030 16 1/2 0.39622 0.004903/4 0.21013 0.00804 3/4 0.55383 0.00315
24 1/3 0.30153 0.01388 24 1/3 0.35361 0.005181/2 0.20006 0.00839 1/2 0.30915 0.00543
2/3 0.40396 0.00459
222 S. M. ISMAIL AND H. DEPEWEG
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Irrig. and Drain. 54: 217–230 (2005)
The time for the water to advance to successive points along the furrow is a semi-logarithmic relationship of
length, inflow rate and slope:
TT ¼ L
f� e� for x ¼ L ð12Þ
where f and g¼ advance coefficient varying with intake family, e¼ 2.7, TT¼advance time (min), x¼ distance
from furrow inlet to point x (m) (x maximum is L) and L¼ furrow length (m).
Based on the measured advance time for continuous flow for each soil type and for each discharge the
intake family was obtained. The intake family was 0.25 for clay soil, 1.0 for sandy soil and 0.60 for sandy clay
and sandy clay loam, respectively. The a, k and f coefficients for those intake families are presented in
Table III.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The SIRMOD III model has been calibrated by two different methods. In the first method the model has been
calibrated by using the measured infiltration parameters (a, k and f) as presented in Table II. The second calibration
method is based on the selected infiltration parameters from SIRMOD III default data, which is presented in
Table III. The two methods are discussed below.
Model calibration based on measured infiltration parameters
The results of the measured and simulated advance for continuous and surge flow irrigation under the
Netherlands and Egyptian field conditions are presented in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. The model gave a
very good fitting of the simulated advances with the measured ones for sandy clay and sandy clay loam under the
Netherlands conditions (Figure 1). The simulated advances for all the continuous and surge flow cases in both soil
types were exactly the same as those measured over the full length. Only a small deviation can be noticed in the
case of 16-min cycle time and half cycle ratio in sandy soil; the simulated advance was identical to the measured
advance over the first 95% of the furrow length (Figure 1).
Therefore it can be concluded that the simulation results based on the measured infiltration parameters fully
represent the actual infiltration under continuous and surge flow irrigation in sandy clay and sandy clay loam soils.
Moreover, the step change in infiltration rate that occurs between surges on previously wetted sections as presented
by the relatively simple approximation as well as the transition equation for the second surge in Equations
Table III. Required input data for model simulation
Egypt NetherlandsSandy clay and
Clay soil Sandy soil sandy clay loam soil
Infiltration parametersa 0.4150 0.5980 0.5290k (m3min�a) 0.0034 0.0033 0.00320f (m3min�1) 0.000068 0.000212 0.000136Manning coefficient nFirst irrigation 0.06 0.04 0.04Second irrigation 0.05 0.03 0.03Inflow rate (l s�1) 0.74 1.0 0.76Slope (mm�1) 0.0024 0.004 0.0058Furrow length (m) 70 70 70Furrow width (m) 0.70 0.70 0.70
SIMULATION OF CONTINUOUS AND SURGE FLOW IRRIGATION UNDER SHORT FIELD CONDITIONS 223
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Irrig. and Drain. 54: 217–230 (2005)
Figure 1. Measured and calculated advance phase in continuous and surge flow irrigation for 0.76 l s�1 and for different cycle times and ratios insandy clay and sandy clay loam soils (A and B respectively) under the Netherlands conditions (based on measured infiltration parameters)
224 S. M. ISMAIL AND H. DEPEWEG
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Irrig. and Drain. 54: 217–230 (2005)
Figure 2. Measured and calculated advance phase in continuous and surge flow irrigation for a discharge of 0.74 l s�1 in clay soil (A) and for adischarge of 1.0 l s�1 in sandy soil (B) with different cycle times and ratios under Egyptian conditions (based on measured infiltration
parameters)
SIMULATION OF CONTINUOUS AND SURGE FLOW IRRIGATION UNDER SHORT FIELD CONDITIONS 225
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Irrig. and Drain. 54: 217–230 (2005)
(3–6) fully represent the investigated soil types. Similar results have been reported by Walker and Humpherys
(1983).
Good simulation results were also obtained in both sandy and clay soil types under Egyptian conditions
especially with continuous flow (Figure 2). The simulated advance for continuous flow exactly matches the
measured one in both soil types. The simulated advance for all the surge flow cases in both soil types was the same
as the measured advance over the first 80% of the furrow length, and in some cases it was the same over the full
length of the furrow (Figure 2). The results indicated that the simulated advances based on the measured infiltration
parameters in sandy and clay soils can represent the actual infiltration rate under continuous and surge flow
irrigation but the special variability in soil intake properties has more impact on the model performance for surge
flow than for continuous flow.
The infiltration is influenced by the surge effects and it is different from one case to the other due to the
impact of cycle ratio and cycle time as well as discharge. The exponent a is different for each case due to these
factors, but it does not show a specific trend as follows from Table II. Any small change in the exponent results
in a change in the k-value; the latter has the greatest effect on the infiltration. The simulated advance for
clay soil under surge flow irrigation did not reach the end of the furrow (Figure 2). This may be due to an
overestimation of the basic infiltration rate. In clay soil the infiltration is slow and a longer time is needed
for the outflow to reach a constant value, which is used for the estimate of the basic infiltration rate f0. It
may also be related to the step change in infiltration that occurs between surges on previously wetted
sections as presented by the relatively simple approximation in Equations (3–6). For correct results the value
of the exponent � in Equation (3) should be changed according to the soil type. In this study �¼ 3 was
used.
Model calibration based on modified infiltration parameters
The infiltration parameters of the intake families (Table III) together with the number of surges and cycle on-
time have been used in the SIRMOD III model to simulate the advance for all cases of continuous and surge flow
irrigation and for all soil types under the Egyptian and the Netherlands conditions (Figures 3 and 4 respectively).
The clay soil under the Egyptian conditions gave relatively large differences between the measured and calculated
advance. The calculated advance for both continuous and surge flow irrigation reached the end of the furrow in a
short time compared with the measured one (Figure 3). In sandy soil the simulation results are better than in clay
soil especially for the surge cases, but they still show a large difference between the simulated and measured
advance especially in the last quarter of the furrow length. In sandy clay and sandy clay loam under the
Netherlands conditions (Figure 4) the simulated advance does not always reach the end of the furrow for both soil
types except for the continuous flow. The simulated advance in continuous flow for both soil types resembles the
measured one.
These results may be due to the values of a, k and f of the selected intake families which maybe do not correctly
represent the actual infiltration of the investigated soil types under the conditions of this field experiment. The
constant a has an effect on the shape of the cumulative infiltration curve, thus on the profile of the advance curve.
An increase in a leads to an increase in the slope of the advance curve (Strelkoff and Souza, 1984). Since the slope
of the presented advance curves is the same for all the simulations, the main effect on the advance might be due to
the k coefficient. An increase in k for a constant a and f will increase the cumulative infiltration and as a
consequence the advance along the furrow will be slower (Strelkoff and Souza, 1984). A decrease in kwill show the
opposite behaviour. The results of the simulation show that the advance reaches the end of the furrow faster than
the measured one, which might be attributed to a not fully correct value of the k coefficient. The results of the
simulations that are based on the default parameters as given by SIRMOD indicate that it is difficult to choose the
most proper infiltration parameters, which present the actual infiltration in a correct way, especially for clay soils.
In some cases, for example for surges with a short on-time (4min), SIRMOD did not correctly simulate the
advance. For example Figure 5 shows a large difference between the measured and simulated advance, especially
when the on-time is so short that the individual surges coalesce (merge together) along the furrow. The software
does not include the possibility to simulate this phenomenon.
226 S. M. ISMAIL AND H. DEPEWEG
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Irrig. and Drain. 54: 217–230 (2005)
Figure 3. Measured and calculated advance phase in continuous and surge flow irrigation for a discharge of 0.74 l s�1 in clay soil (A) and for adischarge of 1.0 l s�1 in sandy soil (B) with different cycle times and ratios under Egyptian conditions (based on one intake family)
SIMULATION OF CONTINUOUS AND SURGE FLOW IRRIGATION UNDER SHORT FIELD CONDITIONS 227
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Irrig. and Drain. 54: 217–230 (2005)
Figure 4. Measured and calculated advance phase in continuous and surge flow irrigation for 0.76 l s�1 and for different cycle times and ratios insandy clay and sandy clay loam soil (A and B respectively) under the Netherlands conditions (based on one intake family)
228 S. M. ISMAIL AND H. DEPEWEG
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Irrig. and Drain. 54: 217–230 (2005)
The simulation results of all the experiments indicate that the most critical input parameters are the infiltration
coefficient a, k and f (basic infiltration rate). As explained before, the coefficient a mainly affects the slope of the
advance curve, while the basic infiltration rate f has almost no effect on the advance as indicated by Figure 6.
Hence, the coefficient k is the most critical infiltration parameter as it has a direct impact on the infiltration. It has to
be noted that it is very difficult to predict or assume these coefficients as they may be different for each furrow, are
affected by the surging mechanisms and change from one irrigation to another. Several efforts have been made to
describe the values of these parameters as a function of the soil types. Among the first attempts was that by the US
Department of Agriculture (1974), followed by an effort of Utah State University (Walker, 1989).
Another important factor in irrigation design is the roughness coefficient n. Values of 0.04, 0.06 and 0.08 have
been assumed for the simulation of the advance for some cases of this study. The sensitivity of the model in view of
changes in roughness n is presented in Figure 7, which indicates that a change in roughness will increase the
Figure 5. Simulated advance for a short on-time (4min on and 12min off) for a discharge of 0.74 l s�1 in clay soil under Egyptian conditions
Figure 6. Sensitivity of simulated advance to basic infiltration rate f, in m3min�1
Figure 7. Sensitivity of the Manning’s coefficient n on the advance
SIMULATION OF CONTINUOUS AND SURGE FLOW IRRIGATION UNDER SHORT FIELD CONDITIONS 229
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Irrig. and Drain. 54: 217–230 (2005)
advance by almost 5% in relation to the measured one. Similar results are reported by Bautista and Wallender
(1992).
CONCLUSIONS
This study has shown that the SIRMOD III model can accurately simulate continuous and surge flow irrigation
under short field conditions when the appropriate infiltration parameters are used. The measured data resulted in
the most optimal simulation of the advance time and consequently of the infiltration. When the infiltration
parameters are selected from the SIRMOD III default data set, they failed to provide a reliable simulation of the
advance phase in each soil. The study has also revealed that the two-point method can be successfully used to
compute the infiltration parameters for continuous and surge flow irrigation under short field conditions and for
different soil types.
REFERENCES
Bautista E, Wallender WW. 1992. Hydrodynamic furrow irrigation model with specified space steps. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage
Engineering 118(3): 450–465.
Blair AW, Smerdon T, Rutledge J. 1984. An infiltration model for surge flow irrigation. In Proceedings of Irrigation and Drainage, Special
Conference, American Society of Civil Engineering: Flagstaff, Arizona; 691–700.
Blair AW, Smerdon T. 1987. Modelling surge flow irrigation infiltration. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE 113(4): 497–
515.
Elliott RL, Walker WR. 1982. Field evaluation of furrow irrigation and advance functions. Transactions of ASAE 25(6): 396–400.
Elliott RL, Walker WR, Skogerboe GV. 1982. Zero-inertia modelling of furrow irrigation advance. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division
ASCE 108(3): 179—195.
Hornbuckle JW, Christen EW, Faulkner RD. 2003. Improving the efficiency and performance of furrow irrigation using modelling in South-
Eastern Australia. Workshop on improved irrigation technologies and methods: R&D and testing. In Proceedings of the 54th Executive
Council of ICID and 20th European Regional Conference, Montpellier, France, 14–19 September.
Ismail SM. 2003. Surge flow irrigation: field experiments under short field conditions in Egypt. Workshop on improved irrigation technologies
and methods: R&D and testing. In Proceedings of the 54th Executive Council of ICID and 20th European Regional Conference, Montpellier,
France, 14–19 September.
Levien SLA, Souza F. 1987. Algebraic computation of flow in furrow irrigation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 113(3): 367–
377.
Popova Z. 2000. Evaluation of furrow irrigation under continuous and surge flow conditions in agro-ecosystems. Journal of Balkan Ecology
3(4): 41–49.
Purkey DR, Wallender WW. 1988. Surge flow infiltration variability. Transactions of ASAE 32(3): 894–900.
Singh VP, He Y. 1988. Muskingum model for furrow irrigation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering ASCE 114(1): 89–103.
Strelkoff T, Souza F. 1984. Modelling effect of depth on furrow infiltration. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 110(4): 374–387.
Stringham GE. 1988. Surge Flow Irrigation. Final report of the Western Regional Research Project W-163, Utah Agricultural Experimental
Station, Utah State University: Logan, Utah, Research Bulletin 515; 92 pp.
Tabuada MA, Rego ZJC, Vachaud G, Pereira LS. 1995. Modelling of furrow irrigation. Advance with two-dimensional infiltration. Agricultural
Water Management 28: 201–221.
USDA. 1974. Border irrigation. In National Engineering Handbook, ch. 4, sect. 15. Soil Conservation Services, USDA: Washington, DC.
USDA. 1986. Surge Flow Irrigation Field Guide. Soil Conservation Services, USDA: Washington, DC; 32 pp.
Walker WR. 1989. Guidelines for designing and evaluating surface irrigation system. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 45, FAO, Rome.
Walker WR. 2003. SIRMOD III—Surface Irrigation Simulation, Evaluation, and Design. Guide and Technical Documentation. Biological and
Irrigation Engineering. Utah State University: Logan, Utah, USA.
Walker WR, Humpherys AS. 1983. Kinematic-wave furrow irrigation model. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering ASCE 109(4):
377–382.
Walker WR, Skogerboe GV (eds). 1987. Surface Irrigation: Theory and Practice. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs.
Wallender WW, Rayej M. 1990. Shooting method for Saint Venant equations of furrow irrigation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage
Engineering ASCE 116(10): 114–122.
230 S. M. ISMAIL AND H. DEPEWEG
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Irrig. and Drain. 54: 217–230 (2005)