Silvicultural systems Peter Savill (University of Oxford) Department of Agriculture University of...
-
Upload
vanessa-mackay -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Silvicultural systems Peter Savill (University of Oxford) Department of Agriculture University of...
Silvicultural systemsPeter Savill
(University of Oxford)
Department of Agriculture
University of Reading
1 February 2000
Silvicultural systems are:
The processes by which the crops that constitute a forest are tended, removed and replaced by new crops, resulting in the production of woods of a distinctive form.
Name of a system is based on:
• number of age classes (e.g. even-aged, uneven-aged), or
• regeneration method (e.g. shelterwood, selection)
A silvicultural system involves:
• method of regeneration (e.g.
coppice, planting, natural
regeneration, direct seeding)
• form of the crop produced (e.g.
“regular” or “irregular”)
• arrangement of the crops over
the forest (a form of
“normality” usually aimed at)
A sustainable 70 year-rotation in a 700 ha
even-aged forest
Area notcontributingto production
Area being thinnedon a cycle 70 year
old, clearfelled
Annual planting or felling areas
Forecast production from British forests
Intensive versus extensive forestry
Features Intensive forests
Age distribution Even aged
Rotation Short (45-60 years)
Species composition Pure, exotic, clonal
Management Cheap
Establishment In open, by planting
Scale of operations Large, concentrated
Production 15-30 m3ha-1yr
Conservation value Low
Intensive versus extensive forestry
Features Extensiveforests
Age distribution 0 to rotation
Rotation Long (150-200 years)
Species composition Many, indigenous
Management Expensive
Establishment Under canopy, natural regeneration
Scale of operations Small, scattered
Production 3-4 m3ha-1yr
Conservation value High
Classification of silvicultural systems
1. coppice systems
2. high forest systems
a) regeneration over whole forest which is
uneven-aged polycyclic or selection systems
b) regeneration concentrated in one part of
forest at any one time
i) old crop removed in several fellings over
years shelterwood systems
ii) old crop removed by a single felling
monocyclic or clear felling system
Intensive versus extensive systems
Intensive (monocyclic) systems
coppicecoppice with standardsclear felling(shelterwood)Extensive (polycyclic)
systemsselectiongroup systems
Application of coppice systems
• Where small dimensioned material is required (fuel wood Salix and Populus, pulp Eucalyptus)
• Generally only with broadleaved trees
• Where some forms of nature conservation are important
• Formerly for basket willows, farm and household implements, etc
A sustainable 70 year-rotation in a 700 ha
even-aged forest
Selectionsystem
Size distributions in tropical rain forest
Number of trees per hectare at different ages in an even-aged stand
Douglas fir, yield class 24
Application of selection systems
• On steep sites for protection against soil erosion and avalanches
• Where landscape continuity is required (urban forests)
• Where wood production and profit are not major motives
• Mainly appropriate for shade bearers (beech and silver firs)
Uniform shelterwood system
Application of shelterwood systems
• Usually on rather similar sites to clear felling—where soil deterioration is not a serious risk
• In environments where species grown produce viable seed regularly (oak and beech in parts of Europe, sycamore and ash in UK, Dipterocarps in SE Asia)
Clear felling system:a typical plantation life history
for spruce (oak)
Year
Obtain seed -3
Raise plants -2
Prepare ground -0.5
Planting 0
Tending 4-15 (0-20)
Thinning 20-45 (30-100)
Clear felling 55 (120)
Replanting second rotation
Application of clear felling system
• On sites where forest clearance will not cause erosion or other problems
• Where profit is a major motive for planting
• With light-demanding species that have evolved in monocultures (often pines, spruces, eucalypts)
Group system
Choice of system depends on:
Regeneration ecology of trees
Site, topography, soil
Wildlife
Pests and diseases
Fire
Climatic risks
Size, age, vigour of existing stand
Introduction of new genotypes
Financial constraints
Patterns of volume increment for an even-
aged stand
maximumM.A.I.
= Yield Class
Mean annual increment curves for
different species
Mean annual increment curves for a
single species