Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

16
Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms Kadziolka K, Estrade, Leautaud A., W. Mustafa, Pierot L. CHU REMIS Interventional Neuroradiology Department France

description

Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Kadziolka K, Estrade, Leautaud A., W. Mustafa, Pierot L. CHU REMIS Interventional Neuroradiology Department France. Primary experience with two types of FD stents. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Page 1: Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular

treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Kadziolka K, Estrade, Leautaud A., W. Mustafa,Pierot L. CHU REMIS Interventional Neuroradiology Department France

Page 2: Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Primary experience with two types of FD stents

Beetwen January 2009 and September 2010

10 patients harboring 12 aneurysms were treated with 13 FD stents.

3 patients were treated with 3 Pipeline ED 7 patients were treated with 10 Silk ED

Page 3: Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Aneurysm morphology

SILK

Fusiform 6

Saccular 2

PIPELINE

Saccular 4

Page 4: Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

SILK and Pipeline

Flexible, microcatheter-delivery, self-

expanding endovascular stent-like

Page 5: Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Silk versus Pipeline metalic alloy

• 48 braided nitinol and platinium microfilaments

• 35-55% metal surface area coverage when fully deployed with proper stent/artery size(Kulcsar et al, Lubicz et al)

• pore size110-250 μm

• 48

• 48 braided cobalt chronium and platinium microfilaments

• 30-35% metal surface area coverage when fully deployed with proper stent/artery size

(Fiolrella et al, Lylyk et al, Szikora et al)

• pore size 0,02-0,05 mm2

Page 6: Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Chalenging and difficult deployment technique. Combination of major forward pressure on the

delivery wire and retraction of the microcatheter with „push and pull”of the whole system to improve correct stent opening and wall apposition in curved vessel.

Oversizing result in additional deployment problems. It is recomended to undersize stent.

Foreshortening must be taken into account during the selection of adequate stent lenght.

Deployment technique - Silk

Page 7: Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Once protecting coil realeased combination of

forward pressure on the delivery wire and retraction of the microcatheter.

It is recomended to oversize stent.

Foreshortening must be taken into account during the selection of adequate stent lenght.

Deployment technique – Pipeline

Page 8: Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Silk versus Pipeline

• Low radial force

• 48

• Important radial force

Page 9: Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Silk versus Pipeline

• Low resistance to twisting and folding the stent lumen

• 48

• Important resistance to narrowing stent lumen

Page 10: Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Silk versus Pipeline visibility

• Very good visibility• Sinusoidal systems

of markers

• Poor visibility during deployment under fluoroscopy

Page 11: Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Silk versus Pipeline recapturability-repositioning

• Can be resheated, removed or repositioned up to 80% of stent been deployed

• No retrival system

• Once partially opened can not be resheated, can be removed.

Limited repositioning.

• Aligator retrival system

Page 12: Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Silk versus Pipeline size selection

• Many lengths 15-40 mm

• Many diameters 2-5 mm

• Single stent treatment available to reconstract wide neck or large fusiform aneurysm

• Limited lengths up to 20 mm

• Many diameters 2-5 mm

• Multi-stent strategy overlapping for wide neck or large fusiform aneurysm

Page 13: Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

SFD or PED?Where to use?

PED for reconstruction of curved parent vessels (small radius)

but we should be prepared for telescopic strategy

Retreatmen of previously treated aneurysms with coil and stent

Page 14: Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

SFD or PED?Where to use?

SFD for remodeling of wide neck or long fusifom or circumferential aneurysms rather in more

straight vessels

Advantages of single stent strategy Possibility of increasing metal surface area

coverage during deployment

Page 15: Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Conclusion

From technical point of view the deployment of Silk seems more demanding and more operator dependent

Page 16: Silk versus Pipeline for reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Conclusion

Knowlage of same diferences, adventages and disadventages of two FD may play a role in patient and strategy selection as well as in decreasing deployment related complications.