SIGSAND 2013 Descartes vs Heidegger

34
Descartes vs Heidegger: Ontological Perspec5ves in the Design of Learning Management Systems SIGSAND 2013 John S. Chapman [email protected] @chapmjs

description

Descartes vs Heidegger: Ontological Perspectives in the Design of Learning Management Systems

Transcript of SIGSAND 2013 Descartes vs Heidegger

  • Descartes vs Heidegger: Ontological Perspec5ves in the Design of Learning

    Management Systems

    SIGSAND 2013 John S. Chapman [email protected]

    @chapmjs

  • Instruc5on, Learning, Technology, Design

    Instructional Psychology & Technology

  • Grade Book Metaphor

    Transmit Course Content Syllabus, Assigned reading

    Grades

  • What would it be like?

    Is there an alterna2ve metaphor?

  • Descartes vs Heidegger: Ontological Perspec2ves in the Design of Learning

    Management Systems

    1.Cartesian Worldview 2.Heideggerian Worldview

    3. Implica5ons for LMS Design

  • Cartesian Worldview

    Res extensa (extended substances) Res cogitans (thinking substances)

  • Cartesian Worldview

    Representa5ons Correspondence Detachment

  • Cartesian Worldview

    Based on our mental representa5ons of the external world we are able to formulate inten5ons and plans, make decisions, and from these perform ac5ons in

    the world.

    Riemer, K., & Johnston, R. B. (2013). Rethinking the place of the artefact in IS using Heideggers analysis of equipment. European Journal of Information Systems.

  • Theories about Rela2onships

    Proper5es of material en55es (LMS) And

    Mental en55es (beliefs, norms, inten5ons)

  • Form follows func2on

    Shape of a building should be determined by its func5on

  • Technology Adop2on

    Match task requirements (mental en5ty) with

    Technology features (material en5ty)

    Riemer, K., & Johnston, R. B. (2013).

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartesian_theater

  • Heideggerian Worldview

  • Hammering

    "To the person doing the hammering, the hammer as such does not exist.

    Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

  • Hammering

    "As observers, we may talk about the hammer and reect on its proper5es, but for the person engaged in hammering, it does

    not exist as an en5ty."

  • "[The hammer] is not present any more than are the tendons of the hammerer's arm.

    Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986).

  • Learning to Walk

    "As I watch my year-old baby learn to walk and pick up objects, I may be tempted to say

    that she is 'learning about gravity.

    Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986).

  • But if I really want to deal with her ontology--with the world as it exists for her--

    there is no such thing as gravity." Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986).

  • Typing

    "As I [am typing], I am in the same situa5on as the hammerer. I think of words and they

    appear on my screen."

    Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986).

  • Typing

    "There is a network of equipment that includes my arms and hands, a keyboard, and many complex devices that mediate between

    it and a screen."

    Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986).

  • Driving

    In driving a car, the control interac5on is normally transparent. You do not think How far should I turn the steering wheel to go

    around that curve? In fact, you are not even aware (unless something intrudes) of using a

    steering wheel.

    Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986).

  • You cannot avoid ac5ng You cannot step back and reect

    The eects of ac5ons cannot be predicted You do not have a stable representa5on of

    the situa5on Every representa5on is an interpreta5on

    Language is ac5on (more than fact)

    Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986).

  • Ontology: What kinds of en22es exist in the world?

    Heidegger: What are the kinds of ways that en55es can be in the world?

  • Heideggers Being and Time

    The way of being for humans: Engagement in Prac5ces (Dasein)

  • Heideggerian Worldview

    "Objects and proper5es are not inherent in the world, but arise only in an event of breaking

    down in which they become unready-to-hand.

    Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986).

  • Object Proper2es In-order-to

    Towards-which (task at hand)

    For-which (of the prac2ce)

    For-the-sake-of (social iden2ty)

    Hammer Wooden

    shank, metal head

    To-put-nails-in

    Joining wood

    Building houses

    To-be-a-carpenter

    Word processor

    Blank screen,

    formaeng tools

    To-write-an-ar5cle

    To submit to a journal

    To publish research

    To-be-an-academic

  • Cartesian LMS Design

    Tradi5onally, research into LMS Design is an object with designed proper5es (the IT ar5fact) but at the same 5me it hides the

    par5cular nature of technology when it is in uent everyday use.

    Riemer, K., & Johnston, R. B. (2013).

  • Coupling

    Hammer is coupled with the hand and arm.

  • LMS Coupling

    Improve coupling between the learner the LMS and the prac5ce of learning.

  • Heideggerian LMS Design

    Research the uent, withdrawn use of LMS

    Riemer, K., & Johnston, R. B. (2013).

  • Thank you

    John S. Chapman [email protected]

    @chapmjs