Signs of Neanderthals Mating With Humans -...
Transcript of Signs of Neanderthals Mating With Humans -...
RSS Feed
Get Science News From TheNew York Times »
The New York Times
Max-Planck-Institute EVA
The Neanderthal DNA that SvantePääbo analyzed came from thesethree bones.
Signs of Neanderthals Mating With Humans
Johannes Krause MPI-EVA
The Vindija cave in Croatia where three small Neanderthal bones were found.
By NICHOLAS WADEPublished: May 6, 2010
Neanderthals mated with some modern humans after all and left their
imprint in the human genome, a team of biologists has reported in the
first detailed analysis of the Neanderthal genetic sequence.
The biologists, led by Svante Paabo of
the Max Planck Institute for
Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig,
Germany, have been slowly
reconstructing the genome of
Neanderthals, the stocky hunters that
dominated Europe until 30,000 years
ago, by extracting the fragments of
DNA that still exist in their fossil
bones. Just last year, when the biologists first announced
that they had decoded the Neanderthal genome, they
reported no significant evidence of interbreeding.
Scientists say they have recovered 60 percent of the
genome so far and hope to complete it. By comparing that
genome with those of various present day humans, the
team concluded that about 1 percent to 4 percent of the
genome of non-Africans today is derived from
Neanderthals. But the Neanderthal DNA does not seem to
have played a great role in human evolution, they said.
Experts believe that the Neanderthal genome sequence will
be of extraordinary importance in understanding human
evolutionary history since the two species split some
600,000 years ago.
So far, the team has identified only about 100 genes —
surprisingly few — that have contributed to the evolution of
modern humans since the split. The nature of the genes in
humans that differ from those of Neanderthals is of
particular interest because they bear on what it means to be human, or at least not
Neanderthal. Some of the genes seem to be involved in cognitive function and others in
bone structure.
“Seven years ago, I really thought that it would remain impossible in my lifetime to
RECOMMEND
SIGN IN TOE-MAIL
REPRINTS
SHARE
MORE IN SCIENC
Amish Farming DrawGovernment ScrutinRead More »
Signs of Neanderthals Mating With Humans - NYTimes.com http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/07/science/07neanderthal.htm...
2 of 4 6/9/10 4:48 PM
sequence the whole Neanderthal genome,” Dr. Paabo said at a news conference. But the
Leipzig team’s second conclusion, that there was probably interbreeding between
Neanderthals and modern humans before Europeans and Asians split, is being met with
reserve by some archaeologists.
A degree of interbreeding between modern humans and Neanderthals in Europe would
not be greatly surprising given that the species overlapped there from 44,000 years ago
when modern humans first entered Europe to 30,000 years ago when the last
Neanderthals fell extinct. Archaeologists have been debating for years whether the fossil
record shows evidence of individuals with mixed features.
But the new analysis, which is based solely on genetics and statistical calculations, is more
difficult to match with the archaeological record. The Leipzig scientists assert that the
interbreeding did not occur in Europe but in the Middle East and at a much earlier period,
some 100,000 to 60,000 years ago, before the modern human populations of Europe and
East Asia split. There is much less archaeological evidence for an overlap between modern
humans and Neanderthals at this time and place.
Dr. Paabo has pioneered the extraction and analysis of ancient DNA from fossil bones,
overcoming daunting obstacles over the last 13 years in his pursuit of the Neanderthal
genome. Perhaps the most serious is that most Neanderthal bones are extensively
contaminated with modern human DNA, which is highly similar to Neanderthal DNA. The
DNA he has analyzed comes from three small bones from the Vindija cave in Croatia.
“This is a fabulous achievement,” said Ian Tattersall, a paleontologist at the American
Museum of Natural History in New York, referring to the draft Neanderthal genome that
Dr. Paabo’s team describes in Thursday’s issue of Science.
But he and other archaeologists questioned some of the interpretations put forward by Dr.
Paabo and his chief colleagues, Richard E. Green of the Leipzig institute, and David Reich
of Harvard Medical School. Geneticists have been making increasingly valuable
contributions to human prehistory, but their work depends heavily on complex
mathematical statistics that make their arguments hard to follow. And the statistical
insights, however informative, do not have the solidity of an archaeological fact.
“This is probably not the authors’ last word, and they are obviously groping to explain
what they have found,” Dr. Tattersall said.
Richard Klein, a paleontologist at Stanford, said the authors’ theory of an early
interbreeding episode did not seem to have taken full account of the archaeological
background. “They are basically saying, ‘Here are our data, you have to accept it.’ But the
little part I can judge seems to me to be problematic, so I have to worry about the rest,” he
said.
In an earlier report on the Neanderthal genome, the reported DNA sequences were found
by other geneticists to be extensively contaminated with human DNA. Dr. Paabo’s group
has taken extra precautions but it remains to be seen how successful they have been, Dr.
Klein said, especially as another group at the Leipzig institute, presumably using the same
methods, has obtained results that Dr. Paabo said he could not confirm.
Dr. Paabo said that episode of human-Neanderthal breeding implied by Dr. Reich’s
statistics most plausibly occurred “in the Middle East where the first modern humans
appear before 100,000 years ago and there were Neanderthals until 60,000 years ago.”
According to Dr. Klein, people in Africa expanded their range and reached just Israel
during a warm period some 120,000 years ago. They retreated during a cold period some
80,000 years ago and were replaced by Neanderthals. It is not clear whether or not they
overlapped with Neanderthals, he said.
These humans, in any case, were not fully modern and they did not expand from Africa, an
episode that occurred some 30,000 years later. If there was any interbreeding, the flow of
genes should have been both ways, Dr. Klein said, but Dr. Paabo’s group sees evidence for
MORE IN SCIENC
Amish Farming DrawGovernment ScrutinRead More »
Signs of Neanderthals Mating With Humans - NYTimes.com http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/07/science/07neanderthal.htm...
3 of 4 6/9/10 4:48 PM
A version of this article appeared in print on May 7, 2010, on page A10of the New York edition.
Neanderthal Man Get E-Mail Alerts
DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid) Get E-Mail Alerts
Archaeology and Anthropology Get E-Mail Alerts
Reproduction (Biological) Get E-Mail Alerts
Related Searches
gene flow only from Neanderthals to modern humans.
The Leipzig group’s interbreeding theory would undercut the present belief that all human
populations today draw from the same gene pool that existed a mere 50,000 years ago.
“What we falsify here is the strong out-of-Africa hypothesis that everyone comes from the
same population,” Dr. Paabo said.
In his and Dr. Reich’s view, Neanderthals interbred only with non-Africans, the people
who left Africa, which would mean that non-Africans drew from a second gene pool not
available to Africans.
Times Reader 2.0: Daily delivery of The Times - straight to your computer.Subscribe for just $4.62 a week.
Ads by Google what's this?
Resurrection of JesusDid Jesus Rise From the Dead? Discover the Facts From Scholarswww.y-Jesus.com/Resurrection
ENVIRONMENT »
Amish Farming DrawsGovernment Scrutiny
GREAT HOMES »
What You Get for ...$300,000
OPINION »
The CyprusModel?On his blog, RossDouthat exploreswhether Israel andPalestine could agree ona Cyprus-style détente.
MOVIES »
An Auteur Sprint: On YourMark, Get Set, Film!
OPINION »
Op-Ed: The ClimateMajority
DINING & WINE »
Restaurant Review: TorrisiItalian Specialties
Home World U.S. N.Y. / Region Business Technology Science Health Sports Opinion Arts Style Travel Jobs Real Estate Autos Back to Top
Copyright 2010 The New York Times Company Privacy Terms of Service Search Corrections RSS First Look Help Contact Us Work for Us Advertise SiteMap
SIGN IN TOE-MAIL
REPRINTS
INSIDE NYTIMES.COM
MORE IN SCIENC
Amish Farming DrawGovernment ScrutinRead More »
Signs of Neanderthals Mating With Humans - NYTimes.com http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/07/science/07neanderthal.htm...
4 of 4 6/9/10 4:48 PM