Sicilia Perumalsamy¹, Papanin Putsathit and Thomas V Riley · 2018-09-12 · 2. Moono P, Lim SC,...

1
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Figure 1. PCR ribotypes of C. difficile in external surroundings of four WA hospitals 1 The University of Western Australia, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Nedlands, Western Australia; 2 School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia; 3 PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Department of Microbiology, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia; 4 School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia. In 2018, a total of 145 samples consisting of soil, mulch, lawn and sand were collected from the outdoor surroundings of four different old and new hospitals in Perth, WA. All samples were incubated in C. difficile selective enrichment broth (BHIB supplemented with cycloserine and cefoxitin) for at least 5 days, followed by alcohol shock and culture on C. difficile selective media (ChromID, bioMerieux). Any putative C. difficile colonies were sub-cultured onto pre-reduced blood agar to be identified based on the distinctive horse dung odour, ground-glass colony morphology and the characteristic chartreuse fluorescence under long-wave UV light (360nm). PCR toxin gene profiling and ribotyping was performed, and PCR ribotypes (RTs) identified by comparing banding patterns to our reference library 4,5,6 . C. difficile was isolated from 90 out of 145 (62.0%) samples (Table 1). Overall, 19.8% (20/101) of the isolates were toxigenic (A+B+CDT-, n=18; A-B+CDT-, n=1; A+B-CDT-, n=1 [identified as a novel strain]). A total of 24 RTs were novel non-toxigenic strains followed by UK 010 (A-B-CDT-), UK 014/020 (A+B+CDT-), QX189 (A-B-CDT-), QX298 (A-B-CDT-), QX284 (A-B-CDT-) and UK 051 (A+B+CDT-) (Figure 1). 24 different previously identified PCR ribotypes were found (Table 1). UK 017 (A-B+CDT-), a strain that is endemic to the Asia-Pacific region, was also found from a newly laid lawn around one of the older hospitals. UK 027 and UK 078 (hypervirulent strains) were not isolated. This is the first study to identify C. difficile in outdoor environment of various hospitals. The presence of highly diverse strains in hospitalised patients suggests the possibility of patients acquiring infections from sources/reservoirs external to the hospital (Table 1). Even though C. difficile is commonly found ubiquitously in soil, the presence of toxigenic strains especially UK 014/020, UK 103 and the Asian strain of much interest, UK 017, is of concern. It is possible that individuals from nearby Asian countries such as Thailand could have imported the strain on the soles of their shoes. Another plausible means of transmission might be vegetables imported from Asia. Despite this, the actual risk of disease remains unclear. Prominent ribotypes identified were UK 014/020 and 010 (Figure 1). UK 014/020 is a common strain identified among both CA and HA cases and the high prevalence of this particular strain in this study (especially from the entrances of the hospitals) further suggests the movement of C. difficile from community sources into the hospital setting (Figure 1). Figure 2 illustrates the common sources of CA-CDI in WA. CDI is fast becoming a One Health issue that requires a comprehensive approach to improving and safeguarding the health of human beings, animals and the environment (external and internal to hospitals). It is prudent for healthcare professionals, policy makers, veterinarians and researchers to be aware of the changing epidemiology of CDI. Checking for antimicrobial resistance in the C. difficile isolates and conducting comparative genomic studies (such as WGS, MLST, SNV analysis) to determine strain relatedness, between patients with CDI admitted in the respective hospitals included in this study. Examining the prevalence of C. difficile on shoes of healthcare staff in old and new WA hospitals Table 1. Prevalence and toxin profile of C. difficile isolates Acknowledgements Many thanks to all members of the Riley Clostridium difficile research laboratory and PathWest Media. 1. Slimings C, Mahé C, Riley TV. The epidemiology of C. difficile infection in Western Australia, 2011&2013;2012. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection. 2015;48(2):S113. 2. Moono P, Lim SC, Riley TV. High prevalence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in public space lawns in Western Australia. 2017;7:41196. 3. Lim SC, Foster NF, Elliott B, Riley TV. High prevalence of Clostridium difficile on retail root vegetables, Western Australia. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2018;124(2):585-90. 4. Kato N, Ou CY, Kato H, Bartley SL, Brown VK, Dowell VR, et al. Identification of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by the polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1991;29(1):33-7. 5. Stubbs S, Rupnik M, Gibert M, Brazier J, Duerden B, Popoff M Production of actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase (binary toxin) by strains of Clostridium difficile. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;186:30712 6. Stubbs SLJ, Brazier JS, O’Neill GL, Duerden BI. PCR Targeted to the 16S-23S rRNA Gene Intergenic Spacer Region of Clostridium difficile and Construction of a Library Consisting of 116 Different PCR Ribotypes. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1999;37(2):461-3. References Clostridium difficile is a Gram positive, anaerobic, spore forming enteropathogen that is responsible for causing a wide spectrum of diseases from mild diarrhoea to toxic megacolon and fulminant colitis. To prevent outbreaks, interventions commonly implemented include patient isolation, environmental cleaning and disinfection in hospitals. Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) have been encountered in increasing numbers in patients without previous healthcare contact, despite being a well established hospital pathogen. Community-acquired CDI (CA-CDI) represents a significant proportion of CDI diagnosed in WA hospitals. In 2011, CA-CDI cases comprised 26% of all hospital-acquired (HA) CDI cases in Australia and the rates have increased consistently since then 1 . Non-human reservoirs of CDI include animals, food and the environment. Examples of common environmental sources are contaminated soil, lawn, mulch, sand, compost and water 2,3 . Background This study reports the prevalence of C. difficile in the immediate outdoor environment of different hospitals, providing further insight into potential sources of CA-CDI. Objective Materials and methods Results Discussion and conclusions Future studies Number of isolates Figure 2. Common sources of CA-CDI transmission Sicilia Perumalsamy¹ , Papanin Putsathit 2 and Thomas V Riley 1,2,3,4 Sicilia Perumalsamy [email protected] Main collection sites No. of samples and prevalence (%) Toxin profiles of known RTs isolated Front of hospital (main and emergency entrances) 48 (33.1%) 16 0 7 Back of hospital 35 (24.1%) 7 1 2 Sides of hospital 23 (15.9%) 6 0 1 Parks and patient sitting areas 30 (20.7%) 13 0 7 Carparks 9 (6.2%) 5 0 1

Transcript of Sicilia Perumalsamy¹, Papanin Putsathit and Thomas V Riley · 2018-09-12 · 2. Moono P, Lim SC,...

Page 1: Sicilia Perumalsamy¹, Papanin Putsathit and Thomas V Riley · 2018-09-12 · 2. Moono P, Lim SC, Riley TV. High prevalence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in public space lawns

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Figure 1. PCR ribotypes of C. difficile in external surroundings of four WA hospitals

1The University of Western Australia, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Nedlands, Western Australia; 2School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University,

Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia; 3PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Department of Microbiology, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia; 4School of Medical and

Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.

• In 2018, a total of 145 samples consisting of soil, mulch, lawn and sand were collected

from the outdoor surroundings of four different old and new hospitals in Perth, WA.

• All samples were incubated in C. difficile selective enrichment broth (BHIB

supplemented with cycloserine and cefoxitin) for at least 5 days, followed by alcohol

shock and culture on C. difficile selective media (ChromID, bioMerieux).

• Any putative C. difficile colonies were sub-cultured onto pre-reduced blood agar to be

identified based on the distinctive horse dung odour, ground-glass colony morphology

and the characteristic chartreuse fluorescence under long-wave UV light (360nm).

• PCR toxin gene profiling and ribotyping was performed, and PCR ribotypes (RTs)

identified by comparing banding patterns to our reference library4,5,6 .

• C. difficile was isolated from 90 out of 145 (62.0%) samples (Table 1).

• Overall, 19.8% (20/101) of the isolates were toxigenic (A+B+CDT-, n=18; A-B+CDT-,

n=1; A+B-CDT-, n=1 [identified as a novel strain]).

• A total of 24 RTs were novel non-toxigenic strains followed by UK 010 (A-B-CDT-), UK

014/020 (A+B+CDT-), QX189 (A-B-CDT-), QX298 (A-B-CDT-), QX284 (A-B-CDT-) and

UK 051 (A+B+CDT-) (Figure 1).

• 24 different previously identified PCR ribotypes were found (Table 1).

• UK 017 (A-B+CDT-), a strain that is endemic to the Asia-Pacific region, was also found

from a newly laid lawn around one of the older hospitals.

• UK 027 and UK 078 (hypervirulent strains) were not isolated.

• This is the first study to identify C. difficile in outdoor environment of various hospitals.

• The presence of highly diverse strains in hospitalised patients suggests the possibility of

patients acquiring infections from sources/reservoirs external to the hospital (Table 1).

• Even though C. difficile is commonly found ubiquitously in soil, the presence of toxigenic

strains especially UK 014/020, UK 103 and the Asian strain of much interest, UK 017, is

of concern.

• It is possible that individuals from nearby Asian countries such as Thailand could have

imported the strain on the soles of their shoes. Another plausible means of transmission

might be vegetables imported from Asia.

• Despite this, the actual risk of disease remains unclear.

• Prominent ribotypes identified were UK 014/020 and 010 (Figure 1).

• UK 014/020 is a common strain identified among both CA and HA cases and the high

prevalence of this particular strain in this study (especially from the entrances of the

hospitals) further suggests the movement of C. difficile from community sources into the

hospital setting (Figure 1).

• Figure 2 illustrates the common sources of CA-CDI in WA.

• CDI is fast becoming a One Health issue that requires a comprehensive approach to

improving and safeguarding the health of human beings, animals and the environment

(external and internal to hospitals).

• It is prudent for healthcare professionals, policy makers, veterinarians and researchers

to be aware of the changing epidemiology of CDI.

• Checking for antimicrobial resistance in the C. difficile isolates and conducting

comparative genomic studies (such as WGS, MLST, SNV analysis) to determine strain

relatedness, between patients with CDI admitted in the respective hospitals included in

this study.

• Examining the prevalence of C. difficile on shoes of healthcare staff in old and new WA

hospitals

Table 1. Prevalence and toxin profile of C. difficile isolates

AcknowledgementsMany thanks to all members of

the Riley Clostridium difficile

research laboratory and

PathWest Media.

1. Slimings C, Mahé C, Riley TV. The epidemiology of C. difficile infection in Western Australia, 2011&2013;2012. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and

Infection. 2015;48(2):S113.

2. Moono P, Lim SC, Riley TV. High prevalence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in public space lawns in Western Australia. 2017;7:41196.

3. Lim SC, Foster NF, Elliott B, Riley TV. High prevalence of Clostridium difficile on retail root vegetables, Western Australia. Journal of Applied Microbiology.

2018;124(2):585-90.

4. Kato N, Ou CY, Kato H, Bartley SL, Brown VK, Dowell VR, et al. Identification of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by the polymerase chain reaction. Journal of

Clinical Microbiology. 1991;29(1):33-7.

5. Stubbs S, Rupnik M, Gibert M, Brazier J, Duerden B, Popoff M Production of actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase (binary toxin) by strains of Clostridium

difficile. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;186:307–12

6. Stubbs SLJ, Brazier JS, O’Neill GL, Duerden BI. PCR Targeted to the 16S-23S rRNA Gene Intergenic Spacer Region of Clostridium difficile and

Construction of a Library Consisting of 116 Different PCR Ribotypes. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1999;37(2):461-3.

References

• Clostridium difficile is a Gram positive, anaerobic, spore forming enteropathogen that is

responsible for causing a wide spectrum of diseases from mild diarrhoea to toxic

megacolon and fulminant colitis.

• To prevent outbreaks, interventions commonly implemented include patient isolation,

environmental cleaning and disinfection in hospitals.

• Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) have been encountered in increasing numbers in

patients without previous healthcare contact, despite being a well established hospital

pathogen.

• Community-acquired CDI (CA-CDI) represents a significant proportion of CDI diagnosed

in WA hospitals. In 2011, CA-CDI cases comprised 26% of all hospital-acquired (HA)

CDI cases in Australia and the rates have increased consistently since then1.

• Non-human reservoirs of CDI include animals, food and the environment. Examples of

common environmental sources are contaminated soil, lawn, mulch, sand, compost and

water2,3.

Background

This study reports the prevalence of C. difficile in the immediate outdoor environment of

different hospitals, providing further insight into potential sources of CA-CDI.

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Discussion and conclusions

Future studies

Nu

mb

er

of

iso

late

s

Figure 2. Common sources of CA-CDI transmission

Sicilia Perumalsamy¹, Papanin Putsathit2 and Thomas V Riley1,2,3,4

Sicilia Perumalsamy

[email protected]

Main collection sites

No. of samples

and prevalence

(%)

Toxin profiles of known RTs isolated

Front of hospital (main and

emergency entrances)

48 (33.1%) 16 0 7

Back of hospital 35 (24.1%) 7 1 2

Sides of hospital 23 (15.9%) 6 0 1

Parks and patient sitting areas 30 (20.7%) 13 0 7

Carparks 9 (6.2%) 5 0 1