Shunt malfunction

44
Shunt malfunction Shunt malfunction

description

Shunt malfunction. Classification of shunt malfunction. Mechanism Mechanical vs Functional Time of occurrence Early vs Late Site of malfunction Causes of malfunction Surgeon, Patient, Shunt. 1.0. .9. P = posterior (60 cases). .8. A = anterior (61 cases). .7. .6. .5. .4. 0. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Shunt malfunction

Page 1: Shunt malfunction

Shunt malfunctionShunt malfunctionShunt malfunctionShunt malfunction

Page 2: Shunt malfunction
Page 3: Shunt malfunction

Classification of shunt malfunction

Mechanism

Mechanical vs Functional

Time of occurrence

Early vs Late

Site of malfunction

Causes of malfunction

Surgeon, Patient, Shunt

Page 4: Shunt malfunction

Oregon H S U(275 cases)

Toronto-Paris(1552 cases)

Denmark(884 cases)

P = posterior(60 cases)A = anterior(61 cases)

Chicago prospective study

Shunt Survival Function

DURATION

6 5 4 3210

Cum Survival

1.0

.9

.8

.7

.6

.5

.4

P

A

Page 5: Shunt malfunction

B & W plots - Follow-up/Event

DP Shunts (Toronto-Paris) - First insertion

Underdrainage

"Overdrainage"

Improper placement

Migration

Fracture

Obstruction XX

Follow-up

211568284288334N =

2800

2400

2000

1600

1200

800

400

0

Page 6: Shunt malfunction

Causes of shunt complications

Early shunt complications

Surgical technique

• Improper placement

• Disconnection

• Migration

• Skin problems

Debris in the CSF

• Early Obstructions

Shunt

• Acute overdrainage

Page 7: Shunt malfunction

Causes of shunt complications

Late shunt complications

Chronic overdrainage

• Hydrodynamic characteristics

Mechanical stress on the device

• Connectors

• Deterioration of the distal tubingMigration & fracture

Proximal obstruction

Page 8: Shunt malfunction
Page 9: Shunt malfunction

Delayed Proximal obstruction is Delayed Proximal obstruction is correlated with chronic overdrainagecorrelated with chronic overdrainage

Slit Normal Enlarged

None 55.7 78.3 63.9

S. Failure 44.344.3 21.7 36.1

Ventr. Obstr. 81.381.3 8.1 21.4

Page 10: Shunt malfunction
Page 11: Shunt malfunction
Page 12: Shunt malfunction

Consequences of overdrainage

Rare : « slit ventricle syndrome » Epstein 1980

Very common : proximal obstruction

Page 13: Shunt malfunction

« Slit ventricle syndrome »

Recurrent episodes of ICH despite a patent shunt

Rare > 0.5% (10/3000)

Loss of volumetric buffering reserve

Treatment

Increase the valve resistance

Cranial expansion

Page 14: Shunt malfunction

Proximal obstruction

Very frequent

ICH with small ventricles at the

beginning (Laplace’s law)

Shunt revision

Page 15: Shunt malfunction

Equivalence

Page 16: Shunt malfunction

Hypothetically….Prevention of late shunt malfunction by :

Prevention of deterioration of the distal

tubing

Prevention of chronic overdrainage

Page 17: Shunt malfunction

Prevention of deterioration of the distal tubing

Integral distal tubing - no

connectors

Striped distal tubing

Page 18: Shunt malfunction

The silent revolution

Past

Present

Page 19: Shunt malfunction

Hypothetically….Prevention of early shunt malfunction by :

?

Page 20: Shunt malfunction

Answer :Series of 946 new cases of hydrocephalus in

childhood (1987-2002)

15 years of hydrocephalus treatment at Necker

Thanks to Ricardo and Mercia

Page 21: Shunt malfunction

Series characteristics

Age

Median 184 day

Etiologies

Page 22: Shunt malfunction

Type of first treatment

Page 23: Shunt malfunction

Third V. - results

Success 66.5%

Factors correlated with success (Cox)

Variable in the equation : ETIOLOGY

• Tumors 84%

• Meningitis 20%

Not in the equation : SURGEON,

PATIENT’S AGE

Page 24: Shunt malfunction

Survival Function - Third ventriculostomy

Follow-up

3600

3240

2880

2520

2160

1800

1440

1080

720

360

0

Cum

Sur

viva

l1.0

.9

.8

.7

.6

.5

.4

.3

.2

.10.0

Page 25: Shunt malfunction

First shunt characteristics - all OSV -- all OSV -

Type

VP / VA 667 / 1

Right / Left 579 / 88 1 bilateral

Tip location

Correct 580

Questionable 88

Page 26: Shunt malfunction

“questionable” placement

Page 27: Shunt malfunction

Shunts - results

No complications 411 61.5%

Infection 49 7.3%

Mechanical complic. 208 31.1%

Page 28: Shunt malfunction

Survival Function - valve OSV

Follow-up

5400

5040

4680

4320

3960

3600

3240

2880

2520

2160

1800

1440

1080

720

360

0

Cum

Sur

viva

l

1.0

.9

.8

.7

.6

.5

.4

.3

.2

.1

0.0

50% at 12 yrs

=

2.5 M$ saved

Probability of survival 45.9% at 15 years

Page 29: Shunt malfunction

Follow-up

Cum

Sur

viva

l

4320

3960

3600

3240

2880

2520

2160

1800

1440

1080

720

360

0

1.0

.9

.8

.7

.6

.5

.4

.3

.2

.1

0.0

Survival Function - OSV vs. « DP shunts »

Log Rank 0.000

OSV

DP shunts

Dramatic decrease of late shunt complications,Dramatic decrease of late shunt complications,but number of early complications unchanged !but number of early complications unchanged !

Page 30: Shunt malfunction

Prevention of early shunt complications ?

Page 31: Shunt malfunction

Complication types

Page 32: Shunt malfunction

Follow-up

5400

5040

4680

4320

3960

3600

3240

2880

2520

2160

1800

1440

1080

720

360

0

Cum

Sur

viva

l1.0

.8

.6

.4

.2

0.0

Survival Functions - Ventricular tip location (correct vs questionable)

« correct »

« questionable »

Page 33: Shunt malfunction

From the Necker collectionFrom the Necker collection

Page 34: Shunt malfunction

“Z”

Page 35: Shunt malfunction

“Signature”

Page 36: Shunt malfunction

“Almost”

Page 37: Shunt malfunction

“Toreador”

Page 38: Shunt malfunction

“Down”

Page 39: Shunt malfunction

“More down”

Page 40: Shunt malfunction

“Up”

Page 41: Shunt malfunction

“More up”

Page 42: Shunt malfunction

“The lost ventricles”

Page 43: Shunt malfunction

“Subway”

Page 44: Shunt malfunction

Conclusions

Third ventriculostomy in 30% of the cases

Prevention of late shunt complications have been achieved by

limiting chronic overdrainage

using integral, “striped” distal tubing

Prevention of early shunt complications is largely up to us

Good surgical technique

Clean CSF

Appropriate hydrodynamic characteristics of the valve