Shifting the CalWORKs Welfare-to-Work Service Delivery Paradigm€¦ · “Innovative Model with...

16
Shifting the CalWORKs Welfare-to- Work Service Delivery Paradigm Innovative Model with Amazing Results” San Francisco Human Services Agency CalWORKs Program 10/7/2016 CW WtW Service Delivery Paradigm 1

Transcript of Shifting the CalWORKs Welfare-to-Work Service Delivery Paradigm€¦ · “Innovative Model with...

  • Shifting the CalWORKs Welfare-to-Work Service Delivery Paradigm

    “Innovative Model with Amazing Results”San Francisco Human Services Agency

    CalWORKs Program

    10/7/2016

    CW WtW Service Delivery Paradigm 1

  • Lessons Learned

    Next StepsNew Vision

    CW WtW Service Delivery Paradigm 2

    New Paradigm!

  • Taking a whole-family to a two-generation approach that will serve to strengthen family outcomes and serve parents and children together.

    In addition to regulatory changes in CalWORKs, the passage of AB74 in 2013 gave counties ability to deliver additional services to serve CW families to help participants make progress toward their self-sufficiency goals that includes employment.

    Housing Support Program HSP

    3

    CalWORKs in Transition

    Expanded Subsidized Employment ESE

    Family Stabilization Program FSP

    CW WtW Service Delivery Paradigm

    Online CalWORKs Assessment Tool OCAT

  • Significant changes that added layer of complexityUn-engaged, dis-engaged, under-engaged

    participantsCrisis as a barrier and its impact to adults, children,

    and family as a wholeChildren and parents need for services are differentFamily support must be constant Families are uninformed of servicesStaff were focus on process and handoffAchieve above 50% WPR for entire WtW Caseload

    Strategic Shift

    CW WtW Service Delivery Paradigm 4

    https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.hyperlean.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/light-bulb-idea-815690.jpeg&imgrefurl=http://www.hyperlean.eu/?page_id%3D1296&docid=RdqdpMiD0_TCCM&tbnid=9z_4xt-bGwLKYM:&w=350&h=350&bih=934&biw=1920&ved=0ahUKEwjJgajb5qDPAhUOzGMKHUy0A1MQxiAIBSgD&iact=c&ictx=1

  • Outcome measures: Reports, Dashboards, and Metrics (generated by Analysts for management and line staff)

    2-Parent =laser-like focus Technology Assisted activities Staffing Realignment – Social Work Competencies added to the

    WTW Case Management. SW Specialist as broker of CW services + comprehensive case management

    100% Engagement and full work participation E2Lite WPR strategy that expanded to entire WtW

    caseload

    CW WtW Service Delivery Paradigm 5

    Solutions that led to Dramatic Improvements

  • CW WtW Service Delivery Paradigm 6

    Coordinated Entry to CalWORKs CEC“Same-day process to access entire CW benefits and services”

  • Job Match Process – immediate employment model

    Tier 0 –first job is looking for a job; short-term; work experience; includes braided services.

    Tier 1 – placed at CBO w/supportive environment (CJP/VIP) Tier 2 – independent work placement w/ minimal coaching (ITIP/PST) Tier 3 – subsidized private employers Tier 4 – unsubsidized private employers

    Entire WtW caseload engagement: Across the board WPR

    CW WtW Service Delivery Paradigm 7

    A True Jobs Program

  • 1. WPR Analysis: E2Lite, RADEP and WINS

    2. CW WtW: Achieving Full Caseload WPR

    CW WtW Service Delivery Paradigm 8

    Reports and Measures

  • WPR Analysis: E2Lite, RADEP and WINS

    CW WtW Service Delivery Paradigm 9

    Federal WPR (RADEP & WINS) = 66.7% E2Lite Sample (all families) WPR = 56.6%

    E2Lite Sample 2-Parent WPR = 61.9%

    2-Parent cases = 8% of caseload but 23% of E2Lite sample!

    Chart1

    FFY 2010

    FFY 2011

    FFY 2012

    FFY 2013

    FFY 2014

    FFY 2015

    FFY 2016 (to April)

    Average WPR

    Average FFY WPR from 2010 - 2016 (to April)

    0.2

    0.271

    0.327

    0.308

    0.377

    0.544

    0.566

    Sheet1

    FFY 2010FFY 2011FFY 2012FFY 2013FFY 2014FFY 2015FFY 2016 (to April)

    20.0%27.1%32.7%30.8%37.7%54.4%56.6%

    Sheet1

    Average WPR

    Average FFY WPR from 2010 - 2016 (to April)

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • CW WtW Service Delivery Paradigm 10

    WPR Analysis: E2Lite, RADEP and WINS cont.

    90% of the cases that met WPR did so through employment!

  • CW WtW Service Delivery Paradigm 11

    WPR Analysis: E2Lite, RADEP and WINS cont.

    Biggest Challenges: Exempt, Sanction, and Non-compliance

  • CW WtW: AchievingFull Caseload WPR

    CW WtW Service Delivery Paradigm 12

  • CW WtW Service Delivery Paradigm 13

    CW WtW: Achieving Full Caseload WPR cont.

  • CW WtW Service Delivery Paradigm 14

    Evidence-based Improvements of the New Model

    61% of CW clients were still earning wages 18-months after completing the program

  • Long Term Success for families on the Self-sufficiency Path

    CW WtW Service Delivery Paradigm 15

    18-months after completing the program, 66% of CW clients were off cash aid and 43% were completely off public benefits!

  • CW WtW Service Delivery Paradigm 16

    Thank You

    Contacts for additional info:∗ [email protected][email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]

    Shifting the CalWORKs Welfare-to-Work Service Delivery Paradigm�“Innovative Model with Amazing Results”New Paradigm!CalWORKs in Transition Strategic ShiftSolutions that led to �Dramatic ImprovementsCoordinated Entry to CalWORKs CEC�“Same-day process to access entire CW benefits and services”A True Jobs ProgramReports and MeasuresWPR Analysis: E2Lite, RADEP and WINSWPR Analysis: E2Lite, RADEP and WINS cont.WPR Analysis: E2Lite, RADEP and WINS cont.CW WtW: Achieving�Full Caseload WPRCW WtW: Achieving �Full Caseload WPR cont.Evidence-based Improvements of the New ModelLong Term Success for families on the Self-sufficiency PathThank You