Shawnigan Lake analysis report - British Columbia · at Shawnigan Lake: A Preliminary Report of the...

British Columbia Forest Science Program

Project Y081189: Analysis and Reporting of the Shawnigan Lake Fertilizer and Thinning Experiment

Fertilization and Thinning Effects on a Douglas-fir Ecosystem at Shawnigan Lake: A Preliminary Report of the SUB1 and

SUB3 Subsidiary Studies

Prepared By:

A.Y. Omule, PhD, RPF Agro Forestry Limited

1564 Granada Crescent Victoria, BC

V8N 2B8

31 March 2008

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The British Columbia Forest Science Program (BCFSP) funded Project Y081189, to analyze and document the 32-year growth response of coastal Douglas-fir to fertilization and thinning in the Shawnigan Lake Project (SLP) area, and to disseminate the results. The SLP study is composed of two components: a) the main experiment, and b) subsidiary studies. The main experiment established in 1971-72 (36 plots) investigated the effects of thinning and fertilization, and consisted of three levels of thinning and five levels of fertilization, including controls. The subsidiary studies include (1) a study established in 1972-1973 (14 plots) to investigate the effects of higher doses of nitrogen (N), and to compare the effects of ammonium nitrate and urea as nitrogen sources, on stand growth (SUB1), (2) a study established in 1983 (2 plots) to investigate the effects of thinning on water use and soil water (SUB2), and a study established in 1987 (8 plots) to investigate the additional growth response of thinned stands to fertilization with P and S along with N (SUB3). The BCFSP Y081189 project initially focused on the main experiment, as have past reports on the SLP project. However, additional funds were later provided by the BCFSP to edit, summarize and analyze the data from the subsidiary experiments (SUB1 and SUB3). (The SUB2 data are not available.) This report provides the plot data summaries and unadjusted treatment means for the SUB1 and SUB3 studies 32 years and 17 years after treatment, respectively. No statistical treatment comparisons were done due to insufficient funds. It is recommended that this analysis be done in the future using the plot data summaries provided in this report. The plot data summaries provided in this report can be used to calibrate growth models.

i

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the British Columbia Forest Science Program (BCFSP) for approving and funding this project; Dr. Al Mitchell of the Canadian Forest Service Pacific Forestry Centre (PFC) for his support during the project proposal preparation and implementation; and Paul Boudewyn also of PFC for editing and maintaining the Shawnigan Lake Project (SLP) database that we used in this report, and for testing the height-diameter model that we used in summarizing the data.

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................II ACRONYMS..................................................................VI 1. INTRODUCTION..........................................................1 2. STUDY AREA & EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN......................................2

2.1 STUDY AREA ............................................................2 2.2 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN .....................................................2

2.2.1 Basic design.....................................................2 2.2.2 SUB1 study.......................................................2 2.2.3 SUB3 study.......................................................3 2.2.4 Plot description.................................................4

3. TREE DATA AND PLOT SUMMARIES .........................................5 3.1 TREE DATA .............................................................5 3.2 ENTIRE-STAND PLOT SUMMARIES...............................................5 3.3 CROP-TREE PLOT SUMMARIES ................................................5

4. PRELIMINARY DATA ANALYSIS .............................................7 5. RESULTS...............................................................8

5.1 SUB1 STUDY: EFFECTS OF HIGH DOSES AND DIFFERENT NITROGEN SOURCES.................8 5.1.1 Mortality........................................................8 5.1.2 Stand diameter..................................................12 5.1.3 Height..........................................................13 5.1.4 Basal area......................................................15 5.1.5 Total volume....................................................17 5.1.6 Merchantable volume.............................................19

5.2 SUB3 STUDY: EFFECTS OF ADDING PHOSPORUS AND SULPUR ..........................21 5.2.1 Mortality.......................................................21 5.2.2 Stand diameter..................................................22 5.2.3 Height..........................................................24 5.2.4 Basal area......................................................26 5.2.5 Total volume....................................................28 5.2.6 Merchantable volume.............................................30

6. CONCLUSIONS .........................................................33 7. LITERATURE CITED .....................................................34 8. APPENDIX I: SUB1 STUDY PLOT SUMMARIES .................................35

8.1 STAND SUMMARIES ......................................................35 8.2 STAND AND STOCK TABLES .................................................49 8.3 250 CROP TREES........................................................75 8.4 500 CROP TREES........................................................83

9. APPENDIX I: SUB3 STUDY PLOT SUMMARIES .................................92 9.1 STAND SUMMARIES ......................................................92 9.2 STAND AND STOCK TABLES .................................................97 9.3 250 CROP TREES.......................................................105 9.4 500 CROP TREES.......................................................110

iii

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Original design: Levels of thinning and fertilization and number of plots per treatment

combination. ...............................................................2 Table 2. SUB1 design: Levels of thinning and fertilization and number of plots per treatment combination.3 Table 3. SUB1 design: effects of high doses of urea (treatment levels and plots). .................3 Table 4. SUB1 design: comparison of ammonium nitrate and urea as nitrogen source (treatment levels

and plots). .................................................................3 Table 5. SUB3 design: Levels of fertilization and number of plots per treatment combination. N stands for

Nitrogen, P for Phosporus and S for sulphur. ........................................4 Table 6. Number of stems/ha lost to mortality 32 years after treatment..........................8 Table 7. Mortality (stems/ha) by 5-cm initial DBH classes and treatment.........................8 Table 8. Number of live stems per hectare by treatment and years after treatment. ................9 Table 9. Periodic mortality (MORT), net growth (NETG) and cumulative growth (CUMG) in terms of basal

area per hectare (m2/ha) by treatment.............................................10 Table 10. Unadjusted quadratic mean DBH averages (cm) by treatment and year after treatment. ....12 Table 11. Quadratic mean DBH periodic annual increment means (cm/yr) by treatment and period. ...12 Table 12. Unadjusted arithmetic average height (m) by treatment and year after treatment. .........13 Table 13. Arithmetic average height periodic annual increment means (m/yr) by treatment and period. .14 Table 14. Unadjusted stand basal area averages (m2/ha) by treatment and year after treatment. .....15 Table 15. Stand basal area periodic annual increment means (m2/ha//yr) by treatment and period.....16 Table 16. Unadjusted stand total volume means (m3/ha) by treatment and year after treatment. ......17 Table 17. Stand total volume periodic annual increment means (m3/ha/yr) by treatment and period. ...18 Table 18. Unadjusted stand merchantable volume means (m3/ha) by treatment and year after treatment.19 Table 19. Stand merchantable volume periodic annual increment means (m3/ha/yr) by treatment and

period....................................................................20 Table 20. Number of stems/ha lost to mortality 17 years after treatment........................21 Table 21. Mortality (stems/ha) by 5-cm initial DBH classes and treatment.......................21 Table 22. Number of live stems per hectare by treatment and years after treatment. ..............22 Table 23. Unadjusted quadratic mean DBH averages (cm) by treatment and year after treatment. ....22 Table 24. Quadratic mean DBH periodic annual increment means (cm/yr) by treatment and period. ...23 Table 25. Unadjusted arithmetic average height (m) by treatment and year after .................24 Table 26. Arithmetic average height periodic annual increment means (m/yr) by treatment and period. .25 Table 27. Unadjusted stand basal area averages (m2/ha) by treatment and year after treatment. .....26 Table 28. Stand basal area periodic annual increment means (m2/ha//yr) by treatment and period.....27 Table 29. Unadjusted stand total volume means (m3/ha) by treatment and year after treatment. ......28 Table 30. Stand total volume periodic annual increment means (m3/ha/yr) by treatment and period. ...29 Table 31. Unadjusted stand merchantable volume means (m3/ha) by treatment and year after treatment.30 Table 32. Stand merchantable volume periodic annual increment means (m3/ha/yr) by treatment and

period....................................................................31

iv

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Unadjusted quadratic mean DBH means 32 years after treatment. ....................12 Figure 2. Unadjusted quadratic mean DBH periodic annual increment over the 32-year period. ......13 Figure 3. Unadjusted arithmetic average height means 32 years after treatment..................14 Figure 4. Unadjusted arithmetic average height periodic annual increment (PAI) over the 32-year period.15 Figure 5. Unadjusted stand basal area means 32 years after treatment. .......................16 Figure 6. Unadjusted stand basal area periodic annual increment (PAI) over the 32-year period. .....17 Figure 7. Unadjusted stand total volume means 32 years after treatment. ......................18 Figure 8. Unadjusted stand total volume periodic annual increment over the 32-year period. ........19 Figure 9. Unadjusted stand merchantable volume means 32 years after treatment. ...............20 Figure 10. Unadjusted average diameter periodic growth over the 32-year period.................21 Figure 11. Unadjusted quadratic mean DBH means 17 years after treatment. ...................23 Figure 12. Unadjusted quadratic mean DBH periodic annual increment over a 17-year period. .......24 Figure 13. Unadjusted arithmetic average height means 17 years after treatment. ................25 Figure 14. Unadjusted arithmetic average height periodic annual increment (PAI) over a 17-year period.26 Figure 15. Unadjusted stand basal area means 17 years after treatment. There was high mortality in the

T2F1 NP treatment. .........................................................27 Figure 16. Unadjusted stand basal area periodic annual increment (PAI) over a 17-year period. There

was high mortality in the T2F1 NP treatment. .......................................28 Figure 17. Unadjusted stand total volume means 17 years after treatment. There was high mortality in the

T2F1 NP treatment. .........................................................29 Figure 18. Unadjusted stand total volume periodic annual increment over a 17-year period. There was

high mortality in the T2F1 NP treatment. ..........................................30 Figure 19. Unadjusted stand merchantable volume means 17 years after treatment. There was high

mortality in the T2F1 NP treatment. ..............................................31 Figure 20. Unadjusted average diameter periodic growth over a 17-year period. There was high

mortality in the T2F1 NP treatment. ..............................................32

v

vi

ACRONYMS AAD Arithmetic Average DBH AAH Arithmetic Average Height BCFSP British Columbia Forest Sciences Program CFS Canadian Forest Service DBH Tree Diameter at Breast Height HTLC Tree Height to Live Crown PAI Periodic Annual Increment PFC Pacific Forestry Centre QMD Quadratic mean DBH SLP Shawnigan Lake Project

1. INTRODUCTION The British Columbia Forest Science Program (BCFSP) has established and funded Project Y081189. The objectives of this project are to analyze and document the 32-year growth response of coastal Douglas-fir to fertilization and thinning in the Shawnigan Lake Project (SLP) area, and to disseminate the results. This project was initiated and implemented by Agro Forestry Limited, a forestry consulting company based in Victoria, British Columbia, in cooperation with the Canadian Forest Service (CFS) Pacific Forestry Centre (PFC), Victoria, British Columbia. Dr. A.Y. Omule of Agro Forestry Limited conducted the data analysis and reporting in liaison with the CFS staff (Dr. Al Mitchell and Paul Boudewyn). The SLP study is composed of two components: a) the main experiment, and b) subsidiary experiments. The main experiment established in 1971-72 (36 plots) investigated the effects of thinning and fertilization, and consisted of three levels of thinning and five levels of fertilization, including controls. The subsidiary experiments include (1) a study established in 1972-1973 (14 plots) to investigate the effects of higher doses of nitrogen (N), and to compare the effects of ammonium nitrate and urea as nitrogen sources, on stand growth (SUB1), (2) a study established in 1983 (2 plots) to investigate the effects of thinning on water use and soil water (SUB2), and a study established in 1987 (8 plots) to investigate the additional growth response of thinned stands to fertilization with P and S along with N (SUB3) (Brix 1993). The BCFSP Y081189 project initially focused on the main experiment, as have past reports on the SLP project. However, additional funds were later provided by the BCFSP to edit, summarize and analyze the data from the subsidiary experiments (SUB1 and SUB3). (The SUB2 data are not available.) This report provides the plot data summaries and unadjusted treatment means for the SUB1 and SUB3 studies 32 years and 17 years after treatment, respectively. The results of the analyses of the main experiment are reported separately (Omule 2008). Section 2 describes the study area and experimental design for the SUB1 and SUB3; section 3 describes the database; section 4 outlines the analysis methods; section 5 provides the study results; and the last section provides some conclusions. Plot data summaries are given in Appendices I and II. Information in Sections 2 and 3 is reported elsewhere (Omule 2008), but it is summarized here for easy reference.

1

2

2. STUDY AREA & EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN 2.1 STUDY AREA The SLP study area is located approximately 5 km west of the north end of Shawnigan Lake on southeastern Vancouver Island. The study site, covering an area of about 50 ha, is located within the very dry maritime Coastal Western Hemlock biogeclimatic subzone (CWHxm) and consists of moderately dry, nutrient-poor to medium ecotopes. Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) is the dominant species, mixed with a minor component of western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla [Raf.] Sarg.), western redcedar (Thuja plicata Donn), western white pine (Pinus monticola Dougl.), and lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.). At the initiation of the establishment of the main experiment in 1971:

• The stand total age was 24 years old, for the stand component that originated from planting with two-year old Douglas-fir seedlings in the spring of 1948, and within 13 years for the naturals.

• The Douglas-fir site index was 25 m at breast height age 50 years, based on Bruce’s (1981) site index curves.

• The average stand density was approximately 3,950 stems/ha, and the average tree diameter and height were 7.6 cm and 8.6 m, respectively.

2.2 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

2.2.1 Basic design The basic design of the main experiment, as originally established in 1971-72, is a 3 x 3 factorial in a completely randomized design. There were three levels of thinning (T0, T1, T2) and three levels of fertilization (F0, F1, F2), resulting in 9 treatment combinations. The T0 and F0 levels are the controls; T1 stands for 1/3 of the basal area removed, and T2 2/3 of the basal area removed. The F1 and F2 represent fertilization with 224 kg N/ha and 448 kg N/ha, respectively. Each treatment combination was applied (replicated) to four plots for a total of 36 plots (Table 1). The 36 plots were established over a two-year period, in1971 (18 plots) and 1972. Table 1. Original design: Levels of thinning and fertilization and number of plots per treatment combination.

Fertilization levels Thinning levels F0 F1 F2

T0 4 4 4T1 4 4 4T2 4 4 4

This original design was later modified in 1987 to include re-fertilization treatments as described in Omule (2008). 2.2.2 SUB1 study This study investigated the effects of higher doses of urea and compared the response from two sources of nitrogen (urea and ammonium nitrate). There were three levels of urea fertilization at higher doses (F3, F4 and F6), two levels of fertilization with ammonium nitrate (F1* and F2*), and three levels of thinning (T0, T1 and T2). The F3, F4 and F6 levels corresponded to urea levels of 672 kg N/ha, 896 kg N/ha and 1334 kg

3

N/ha, respectively. The F1* and F2* treatments corresponded to application of ammonium nitrate at 224 kg N/ha and 448 kg N/ha, respectively. The thinning levels were the same as those of the main experiment. Each treatment combination was replicated twice (two plots), although not all treatment combinations were applied. Thus, the high-levels and ammonium nitrate levels form an unbalanced design (Table 2). Table 2. SUB1 design: Levels of thinning and fertilization and number of plots per treatment combination.

Fertilization levels Thinning levels F1* F2* F3 F4 F6

T0 2 2 - 2 -T1 - - - 2 -T2 - 2 2 2 2

The T0F1*, T0F2* and T2F3 plots were established in 1972, and the remaining plots were established in 1973. Merging the SUB1 design with the main experiment design can help answer the following two questions:

1. What are the effects of high doses of urea? 2. How do ammonium nitrate and urea compare as sources of nitrogen in growth

response? The resulting designs to answer questions 1 and 2 are shown in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. Table 3. SUB1 design: effects of high doses of urea (treatment levels and plots).

Fertilization levels Thinning levels F0 F1 F2 F3 F4 F6

T0 4 4 4 - 2 -T1 4 4 4 - 2 -T2 4 4 4 2 2 2

Table 4. SUB1 design: comparison of ammonium nitrate and urea as nitrogen source (treatment levels and plots).

Fertilization levels Thinning levels F0 F1 F2 F1* F2*

T0 4 4 4 2 2T2 4 4 4 - 2

2.2.3 SUB3 study This study investigated the growth response to fertilization with nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and sulphur (S). The question to be answered was: do P and S fertilization increase growth response to N? The fertilization treatment levels involved different combinations of N, P and S: 0 kg N/ha (F0), 224 kg N/ha alone (N), 224 kg N plus 100 kg P/ha (NP), and 224 kg N/ha plus 100 kg P/ha plus 100 kg S/ha (NPS). The fertilizer treatment

4

levels were randomly applied to two plots each, and all the plots were thinned to T2 level (2/3 basal area removed) (Table 3). Table 5. SUB3 design: Levels of fertilization and number of plots per treatment combination. N stands for Nitrogen, P for Phosporus and S for sulphur.

Fertilization levels Thinning levels F0 N NP NPS

T2 2 2 2 2 2.2.4 Plot description All plots in the main experiment and in SUB1 and SUB3 are square and 0.0405 ha in area, and are buffered. The plots established in 1971 and 1972 plots had a 15-m wide buffer and those established in 1973 and 1987 had a 10-m wide buffer. The thinning aimed to leave an even spacing of residual trees, which were adequately represented across a range of diameter classes. It eliminated advanced natural regeneration or “wolf” trees. Nitrogen was applied in the form of forest-grade urea or ammonium nitrate, phosphorus was applied in the form of triple superphosphate (20% P), and sulphur was applied in the form of 90% pelleted elemental sulphur. The fertilizers were uniformly applied within a plot by hand-broadcast after thinning.

5

3. TREE DATA AND PLOT SUMMARIES 3.1 TREE DATA The measured variables for growth and yield purposes included tree diameter at breast height (DBH), and total height. These variables were measured on all the core trees (trees within the 0.0405-ha plot) at 0, 3, 6, 9,12,15,18, 24 and 32 years after plot establishment in SUB1, and at 0,1,2,3,10 and 17 years after treatment in SUB3. The recent remeasurement in both SUB1 and SUB3 plots was completed in 2002/03. Tree heights were measured in only a sub-sample of core trees after the 9th year. These height sample trees were randomly chosen from diameter classes to ensure that the sample trees were taken across the full range of diameters. The individual tree measurements were summarized into plot averages, for the entire stand and for crop trees, as described in the next two sections. 3.2 ENTIRE-STAND PLOT SUMMARIES The CFS staff (Paul Boudewyn) assembled and edited the individual tree measurements. Tree records were edited to check for errors such as decreasing heights or diameters. Agro Forestry Limited staff (A.Y. Omule) re-checked and summarized the individual tree data into entire-stand per-hectare and average plot values as follows:

1. Checked the edited the individual tree measurements provided by CFS. 2. Unmeasured tree heights were estimated from appropriate height-diameter

curves fitted separately for each plot and measurement period. The Naslund model tested by Paul Boudewyn on the same dataset was the basis of the height-diameter equations.

3. Tree total volume (whole stem, inside bark) and merchantable volumes of all trees, including the minor species, were estimated from the existing Douglas-fir equations of Omule, et al. (1987). Merchantable volume is tree total volume less the volume of a 30-cm tall stump and a 10-cm diameter inside bark tree top. Trees of the minor species were very few (<1%) and small in diameter (on average < 15 cm at the last measurement). We considered using Kozak’s taper equations for estimating the volume of the minor species, as was done by McWilliams and Therien (1996). We, however, decided not to use the taper equations because, as noted by Omule et al. (1987), the database on which Kozak’s equations were based included almost no small trees. Thus, these taper equations are inappropriate for small trees.

4. Attribute summaries were produced using customized summary programs written in SAS. They were produced by study component, plot and measurement period, for all species, for thinned trees, dead (mortality) trees, and standing trees. The stand summary attributes included the variables top height (average height of 100 largest DBH trees/ha), mean height (arithmetic average height of all trees), total age, breast-height age, total volume, stem count, mean DBH (arithmetic average DBH of all trees), quadratic mean DBH, basal area, and merchantable volume. Stand and stock tables for number of stems/ha and merchantable volume/ha, respectively, by 5-cm diameter classes, were also produced.

These summaries are tabulated by plot in Appendices I (Sections 8.1 and 8.2) and II (Sections 9.1 and 9.2), for the SUB1 and SUB3 studies, respectively. 3.3 CROP-TREE PLOT SUMMARIES Agro Forestry Limited staff (A.Y. Omule) edited and summarized the individual-tree measurements of 250 and 500 crop trees per hectare. These crop trees represent the

6

typical number of residual trees after commercial thinning and juvenile spacing, respectively, in coastal British Columbia (Gardner 1990, p. 4). The crop trees also represent the larger-diameter cohort of trees. Thus, 10 and 20 crop trees were chosen per plot. The chosen crop trees were Douglas-fir alive at year 32 for SUB1 (and year 17 for SUB3) that had the largest DBH at the time of treatment (year 0). Then, as was done for the entire-stand summaries and using the same SAS summary programs, Agro Forestry Limited summarized the crop-tree individual-tree measurements by plot and measurement period, into crop-tree summaries. These crop-tree summary tables and plot summary variables were the same as those for the entire stand. That is, the tables included stand summaries, and stand and stock tables. These summaries are tabulated in Appendices I (Sections 8.3 and 8.4) and II (Sections 9.3 and 9.4), for the SUB1 and SUB3 studies, respectively.

7

4. PRELIMINARY DATA ANALYSIS A preliminary analysis of the SUB1 and SUB3 data was conducted. It involved tabulation of unadjusted treatment means for various entire-stand attributes. Formal statistical comparison of treatment means and calculation of treatment means adjusted for differences in pre-treatment conditions were not done due to lack of funds. This analysis should be done in the future, using the designs shown in Figures 3, 4 and 5, to answer the questions posed in Section 2. This analysis would be similar to that done by Barclay and Brix (1984) and Barclay and Brix (1985) for the SUB1 study 9 years after treatment. The tabulation focused on per-hectare and average mortality, diameter, height, basal area, total volume and merchantable volume growth and yield. The number of stems per hectare lost to mortality was tabulated by treatment, cause of mortality and initial 5-cm DBH classes. As well, the basal area per hectare mortality and net growth were tabulated by treatment. Stand basal area, and total and merchantable volume were tabulated for 32 years and 17 years after treatment, for SUB1 and SUB2, respectively. Stand basal area, and total and merchantable volume periodic annual increment (PAI) over a 32-year period (SUB1) and 17-year period (SUB3) were tabulated by treatment.

8

5. RESULTS 5.1 SUB1 STUDY: EFFECTS OF HIGH DOSES AND DIFFERENT NITROGEN SOURCES

5.1.1 Mortality Mortality was highest in the T0 and T1 treatments and lowest in the T2 treatment. The main cause of the mortality was suppression (Table 6). Snow damage was also prevalent, particularly in the T0 treatment. Mortality was highest in the 5-cm and 10-cm initial DBH classes (Table 7). Within the T0 treatment, fertilization increased mortality presumably by increasing the rate of suppression. The highest mortality was in the T0F2 AN treatment (59% of original stems/ha lost), and the lowest was in the T2F4 UREA treatment (3%). As a result of the mortality, the number of residual stems per hectare in the unthinned stands is now only about 41-47% of the original density 32 years after treatment (Tables 8 and 9). Table 6. Number of stems/ha lost to mortality 32 years after treatment.

Cause of mortality Treatment

Suppression Snow damage

White pine blister rust Root rot Unknown Other

Total

T0F1 AN 1469 235 12 62 37 0 1815T0F2 AN 2037 99 0 111 12 0 2259T0F4 UREA 1358 370 86 0 248 0 2062T1F4 UREA 259 74 37 0 62 0 432T2F2 AN 0 49 25 0 0 0 74T2F3 UREA 12 50 0 0 0 0 62T2F4 UREA 12 12 0 0 0 0 25T2F6 UREA 0 12 12 12 0 0 37 Table 7. Mortality (stems/ha) by 5-cm initial DBH classes and treatment.

5-cm initial DBH class Treatment 5 10 15 20

Total

T0F1 AN 1309 481 25 0 1815T0F2 AN 1679 568 12 0 2259T0F4 UREA 1420 617 25 0 2062T1F4 UREA 198 222 12 0 432T2F2 AN 25 49 0 0 74T2F3 UREA 12 50 0 0 62T2F4 UREA 0 25 0 0 25T2F6 UREA 12 25 0 0 37

9

Table 8. Number of live stems per hectare by treatment and years after treatment.

Years after treatment Treatment 0

(before) 0

(after) 3 6 9 12 15 18 24 32

T0F1 AN 3445 3445 3370 3148 3037 2729 2469 2074 1852 1630T0F2 AN 3852 3852 3617 3099 2765 2420 2149 1852 1753 1593T0F4 UREA 3580 3580 3445 2593 2259 2148 1901 1753 1679 1519T1F4 UREA 4259 1926 1902 1852 1803 1778 1716 1679 1655 1494T2F2 AN 3753 926 889 877 877 877 877 877 877 852T2F3 UREA 3630 865 865 865 865 852 852 852 852 803T2F4 UREA 3408 840 827 827 827 815 815 815 815 815T2F6 UREA 4408 840 828 828 828 815 815 815 815 803

Table 9. Periodic mortality (MORT), net growth (NETG) and cumulative growth (CUMG) in terms of basal area per hectare (m2/ha) by treatment.

TO T1 T2 Fertilization levels

Period (yrs) MORT NET G CUM G MORT NET G CUM G MORT NET G CUM G

F1 AN 0-3 0.20 7.00 7.00 3-6 0.60 3.85 10.85 6-9 0.35 3.95 14.80 9-12 0.90 5.60 20.40 12-15 1.65 2.75 23.15 15-18 2.15 1.40 24.55 18-24 1.80 4.05 28.60 24-32 3.50 3.05 31.65 0-32 11.15 31.65 F2 AN 0-3 0.35 7.90 7.90 0.50 6.75 6.75 3-6 1.65 4.80 12.70 0.40 5.95 12.70 6-9 1.25 4.10 16.80 0.00 6.05 18.75 9-12 1.35 5.75 22.55 0.00 4.7 23.45 12-15 1.90 3.20 25.75 0.00 3.95 27.40 15-18 2.45 2.10 27.85 0.00 3.45 30.85 18-24 0.95 5.85 33.70 0.00 5.7 36.55 24-32 1.95 5.55 39.25 1.50 6.95 43.50 0-32 11.85 39.25 2.40 43.50 F3 UREA 0-3 0.00 6.25 6.25 3-6 0.00 6.20 12.45 6-9 0.00 5.60 18.05 9-12 0.20 4.90 22.95 12-15 0.00 4.30 27.25 15-18 0.00 3.50 30.75 18-24 0.00 6.40 37.15 24-32 1.30 5.70 42.85

10

11

TO T1 T2 Fertilization levels

Period (yrs) MORT NET G CUM G MORT NET G CUM G MORT NET G CUM G

0-32 1.50 42.85 F4 UREA 0-3 0.40 8.20 8.20 0.2 8.55 8.55 0.20 6.45 6.45 3-6 3.05 3.75 11.95 0.9 7.1 15.65 0.00 6.35 12.80 6-9 1.20 5.75 17.70 0.15 7.3 22.95 0.00 6.60 19.40 9-12 0.45 4.60 22.30 0.2 5.5 28.45 0.20 5.05 24.45 12-15 1.50 2.55 24.85 0.5 3.65 32.10 0.00 4.10 28.55 15-18 1.30 1.65 26.50 0.3 3.05 35.15 0.00 3.35 31.90 18-24 0.80 4.90 31.40 0.25 5.65 40.80 0.00 5.50 37.40 24-32 2.85 4.60 36.00 2.8 4.65 45.45 0.00 7.30 44.70 0-32 11.55 36.00 5.30 45.45 0.40 44.70 F6 UREA 0-3 0.20 6.10 6.10 3-6 0.00 6.80 12.90 6-9 0.00 6.75 19.65 9-12 0.50 4.90 24.55 12-15 0.00 4.20 28.75 15-18 0.00 3.80 32.55 18-24 0.00 5.85 38.40 24-32 0.70 7.25 45.65 0-32 1.40 45.65

5.1.2 Stand diameter The quadratic mean DBH (QMD) and QMD PAI unadjusted treatment means are displayed in Tables 10 and 11, respectively, by year of treatment. The QMD ranged from 20.6 cm to 29.3 cm 32 years after treatment, and the 32-year QMD periodic annual increment (PAI) means ranged from 0.24 cm/yr to 0.30 cm/yr (Figures 1 and 2). Table 10. Unadjusted quadratic mean DBH averages (cm) by treatment and year after treatment.


(before) 0

(after) 3 6 9 12 15 18 24 32

T0F1 AN 8.3 8.3 9.9 11.0 11.9 13.8 15.0 16.7 18.5 20.6T0F2 AN 8.5 8.5 10.2 11.9 13.4 15.4 16.9 18.5 20.1 22.1T0F4 UREA 9.4 9.4 11.0 13.4 15.4 16.7 18.2 19.2 20.6 22.5T1F4 UREA 9.0 10.3 12.8 14.8 16.6 17.9 18.9 19.7 20.9 22.9T2F2 AN 9.2 11.0 15.0 17.8 20.1 21.8 23.1 24.2 25.8 28.1T2F3 UREA 8.8 10.8 14.4 17.3 19.6 21.5 22.9 24.0 26.0 28.4T2F4 UREA 9.5 11.5 15.3 18.2 20.8 22.8 24.1 25.2 26.8 28.9T2F6 UREA 8.8 11.4 15.0 18.2 20.8 22.8 24.2 25.4 27.1 29.3

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

T0F1 AN T0F2 AN T0F4UREA

T1F4UREA

T2F2 AN T2F3UREA

T2F4UREA

T2F6UREA

Treatment combination

Qua

d. m

ean

DB

H (c

m)

Figure 1. Unadjusted quadratic mean DBH means 32 years after treatment. Table 11. Quadratic mean DBH periodic annual increment means (cm/yr) by treatment and period. 12

13

Period (yrs after treatment) Treatment

0-3 6-9 9-12 12-15 15-18 18-24 24-32 0-32 T0F1 AN 0.53 0.37 0.30 0.62 0.40 0.57 0.30 0.26T0F2 AN 0.58 0.57 0.48 0.68 0.48 0.55 0.27 0.24T0F4 UREA 0.53 0.82 0.67 0.42 0.50 0.35 0.23 0.24T1F4 UREA 0.85 0.67 0.60 0.42 0.35 0.27 0.20 0.25T2F2 AN 1.33 0.93 0.77 0.57 0.43 0.35 0.28 0.28T2F3 UREA 1.22 0.97 0.75 0.63 0.48 0.37 0.33 0.30T2F4 UREA 1.27 0.98 0.87 0.65 0.45 0.35 0.28 0.26T2F6 UREA 1.22 1.05 0.88 0.65 0.47 0.40 0.29 0.28

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6


T1F4UREA

T2F2 AN T2F3UREA

T2F4UREA

T2F6UREA


Qua

d. m

ean

DB

H P

AI (

cm/y

r)

Figure 2. Unadjusted quadratic mean DBH periodic annual increment over the 32-year period. 5.1.3 Height The arithmetic average height (AAH) and AAH PAI unadjusted treatment means are displayed in Tables 112 and 13, respectively, by year of treatment. The AAH ranged from 21.5 m to 27.1 cm 32 years after treatment, and the 32-year AAH periodic annual increment (PAI) means ranged from 0.0.26 m/yr to 0.33 m/yr (Figures 3 and 4). Table 12. Unadjusted arithmetic average height (m) by treatment and year after treatment.


(before) 0

(after) 3 6 9 12 15 18 24 32

T0F1 AN 8.5 8.5 10.1 11.6 12.5 12.8 17.1 17.8 19.7 21.5T0F2 AN 8.6 8.5 10.1 11.6 12.5 12.8 17.1 17.8 19.7 21.5T0F4 UREA 9.5 8.6 10.4 12.1 13.6 15.9 17.5 18.7 20.9 22.8

14

T1F4 UREA 9.2 9.5 11.2 13.4 15.7 16.2 18.9 20.4 22.0 24.3T2F2 AN 9.1 10.4 12.3 13.8 15.9 16.4 18.5 20.1 21.6 23.4T2F3 UREA 9.0 10.6 12.8 14.5 16.7 17.2 20.1 21.4 23.4 26.0T2F4 UREA 9.4 10.9 13.0 14.7 17.0 17.7 21.0 22.6 24.6 27.1T2F6 UREA 9.1 11.2 12.8 14.5 16.9 17.5 20.6 22.0 24.4 26.5

15.0

18.0

21.0

24.0

27.0

30.0


T1F4UREA

T2F2 AN T2F3UREA

T2F4UREA

T2F6UREA


Mea

n he

ight

(m)

Figure 3. Unadjusted arithmetic average height means 32 years after treatment. Table 13. Arithmetic average height periodic annual increment means (m/yr) by treatment and period.

Period (yrs after treatment) Treatment 0-3 6-9 9-12 12-15 15-18 18-24 24-32 0-32

T0F1 AN 0.52 0.50 0.30 0.10 1.43 0.23 0.33 0.22T0F2 AN 0.62 0.55 0.50 0.77 0.53 0.42 0.36 0.24T0F4 UREA 0.57 0.75 0.77 0.17 0.90 0.50 0.27 0.28T1F4 UREA 0.63 0.50 0.68 0.17 0.70 0.55 0.24 0.23T2F2 AN 0.72 0.58 0.73 0.17 0.95 0.43 0.33 0.33T2F3 UREA 0.70 0.47 0.60 0.57 0.60 0.40 0.58 0.31T2F4 UREA 0.68 0.58 0.75 0.23 1.12 0.53 0.33 0.31T2F6 UREA 0.55 0.57 0.80 0.20 1.02 0.47 0.41 0.26

15

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6


T1F4UREA

T2F2 AN T2F3UREA

T2F4UREA

T2F6UREA


Mea

n he

ight

PA

I (m

/yr)

Figure 4. Unadjusted arithmetic average height periodic annual increment (PAI) over the 32-year period. 5.1.4 Basal area The stand basal area and basal area PAI unadjusted treatment means are displayed in Tables 14 and 15, respectively, by year of treatment. The stand basal area ranged from 50.5 m2/ha to 61.5 m2/ha 32 years after treatment, and the basal area PAI means ranged from 0.38 m2/ha/yr to 0.91 m2/ha/yr (Figures 5 and 6) Table 14. Unadjusted stand basal area averages (m2/ha) by treatment and year after treatment.


(before) 0

(after) 3 6 9 12 15 18 24 32


16

35.0

45.0

55.0

65.0


T1F4UREA

T2F2 AN T2F3UREA

T2F4UREA

T2F6UREA


Stan

d ba

sal a

rea

(m2/

ha)

Figure 5. Unadjusted stand basal area means 32 years after treatment. Table 15. Stand basal area periodic annual increment means (m2/ha//yr) by treatment and period.



17

0.6

0.9

1.2

1.5


T1F4UREA

T2F2 AN T2F3UREA

T2F4UREA

T2F6UREA


Stan

d ba

sal a

rea

PAI (

m2/

ha/y

r)

Figure 6. Unadjusted stand basal area periodic annual increment (PAI) over the 32-year period. 5.1.5 Total volume The stand total volume and total volume PAI unadjusted treatment means are displayed in Tables 16 and 17, respectively, by year of treatment. The stand total volume ranged from 449.7 m3/ha to 590.3 m3/ha 32 years after treatment, and the total volume PAI means ranged from 6.99 m3/ha/yr to 14.35 m3/ha/yr (Figures 7 and 8) Table 16. Unadjusted stand total volume means (m3/ha) by treatment and year after treatment.


(before) 0

(after) 3 6 9 12 15 18 24 32


18

300

400

500

600

700


T1F4UREA

T2F2 AN T2F3UREA

T2F4UREA

T2F6UREA


Tota

l vol

ume

at 3

2 yr

s (m

3/ha

)

Figure 7. Unadjusted stand total volume means 32 years after treatment. Table 17. Stand total volume periodic annual increment means (m3/ha/yr) by treatment and period.



19

6.0

9.0

12.0

15.0

18.0


T1F4UREA

T2F2 AN T2F3UREA

T2F4UREA

T2F6UREA


Tota

l vol

ume

PAI (

m3/

ha/y

r)

Figure 8. Unadjusted stand total volume periodic annual increment over the 32-year period. 5.1.6 Merchantable volume The stand merchantable volume and merchantable volume PAI unadjusted treatment means are displayed in Tables 18 and 19, respectively, by year of treatment. The stand merchantable volume ranged from 378.4 m3/ha to 523.1 m3/ha 32 years after treatment, and the merchantable volume PAI means ranged from 21.43 m3/ha/yr to 37.00 m3/ha/yr (Figures 9 and 10) Table 18. Unadjusted stand merchantable volume means (m3/ha) by treatment and year after treatment.


(before) 0

(after) 3 6 9 12 15 18 24 32


20

300

350

400

450

500

550


T1F4UREA

T2F2 AN T2F3UREA

T2F4UREA

T2F6UREA


Mer

ch. V

olum

e (m

3/ha

)

Figure 9. Unadjusted stand merchantable volume means 32 years after treatment. The unadjusted arithmetic average diameter periodic growth is shown Table8. Average diameter growth over the 32-year period is higher in the thinned high-dose treatments (Figure 2). Table 19. Stand merchantable volume periodic annual increment means (m3/ha/yr) by treatment and period.



21

6.0

9.0

12.0

15.0

18.0


T1F4UREA

T2F2 AN T2F3UREA

T2F4UREA

T2F6UREA


Mer

ch. v

olum

e PA

I (m

3/ha

/yr)

Figure 10. Unadjusted average diameter periodic growth over the 32-year period. 5.2 SUB3 STUDY: EFFECTS OF ADDING PHOSPORUS AND SULPUR

5.2.1 Mortality There was very little or no mortality in most of the treatments (Table 18). Mortality was highest in the 10-20-cm initial DBH classes (Table 19). As a result of the little mortality, the number of residual stems per hectare has remained virtually unchanged over time among all the treatments, except the T2F0 and T2F1 NP treatments where mortality occurred (Table 20). Most of the mortality was in the T2F1 NP treatment (87%). The cumulative mortality over the period 0-17 years after treatment in T2F0 and T2F1 NP was 99 stems/ha and 136 stems/ha, respectively. Table 20. Number of stems/ha lost to mortality 17 years after treatment.

Cause of mortality Total Treatment Snow

damage White pine blister rust Root rot Unknown Other Suppression

T2F0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12T2F1 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0T2F1 NP 0 0 0 37 0 49 86T2F1 NPS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 21. Mortality (stems/ha) by 5-cm initial DBH classes and treatment.


Total

T2F0 0 12 0 0 12T2F1 N 0 0 0 0 0T2F1 NP 0 25 49 12 86

22


Total

T2F1 NPS 0 0 0 0 0 Table 22. Number of live stems per hectare by treatment and years after treatment.


(before) 0

(after) 1 2 3 10 17

T2F0 3753 889 877 877 877 877 840 T2F1 N 3655 902 902 902 902 902 902 T2F1 NP 3358 889 877 840 840 803 766 T2F1 NPS 3975 914 914 914 914 914 914 5.2.2 Stand diameter The quadratic mean DBH (QMD) and QMD PAI unadjusted treatment means are displayed in Tables 21 and 22, respectively. The QMD ranged from 22.8 cm to 24.3 cm 17 years after treatment. The QMD and QMD PAI do not appear to be affected by the addition of P or S (Figures 11 and 12). Table 23. Unadjusted quadratic mean DBH averages (cm) by treatment and year after treatment.


(before) 0

(after) 1 2 3 10 17

T2F0 12.2 16.3 16.6 16.9 17.2 19.9 22.8 T2F1 N 12.6 16.3 16.7 17.5 18.1 21.0 23.8 T2F1 NP 12.6 16.4 16.9 17.8 18.3 21.4 24.3 T2F1 NPS 12.1 16.1 16.5 17.2 17.8 20.8 23.7

23

15.0

20.0

25.0

T2F0 T2F1 N T2F1 NP T2F1 NPS


Qua

d. m

ean

DB

H (c

m)

Figure 11. Unadjusted quadratic mean DBH means 17 years after treatment. Table 24. Quadratic mean DBH periodic annual increment means (cm/yr) by treatment and period.

Period (yrs after treatment) Treatment 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-10 10-17 0-17

T2F0 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.39 0.41 0.38T2F1 N 0.45 0.75 0.60 0.42 0.39 0.44T2F1 NP 0.55 0.85 0.55 0.44 0.41 0.47T2F1 NPS 0.45 0.70 0.60 0.42 0.41 0.45

24

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5



Qua

d. m

ean

DB

H P

AI (

cm/y

r)

Figure 12. Unadjusted quadratic mean DBH periodic annual increment over a 17-year period. 5.2.3 Height The arithmetic average height (AAH) and AAH PAI unadjusted treatment means are displayed in Tables 25 and 26, respectively. The AAH ranged from 19.2 m to 20.3 m 17 years after treatment, and the AAH PAI ranged from 0.18 m/yr to 0.23 m/yr (Figures 13 and 14). Table 25. Unadjusted arithmetic average height (m) by treatment and year after treatment.


(before) 0

(after) 1 2 3 10 17

T2F0 16.1 16.1 16.3 16.4 16.5 17.9 19.2 T2F1 N 15.9 15.9 16.2 16.4 16.8 18.5 19.5 T2F1 NP 16.4 16.4 16.7 17.0 17.4 19.0 20.3 T2F1 NPS 15.6 15.6 15.8 16.1 16.4 17.8 19.5

25

15.0

18.0

21.0



Mea

n he

ight

(m)

Figure 13. Unadjusted arithmetic average height means 17 years after treatment. Table 26. Arithmetic average height periodic annual increment means (m/yr) by treatment and period.


T2F0 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.19 0.18T2F1 N 0.30 0.25 0.40 0.24 0.14 0.21T2F1 NP 0.25 0.35 0.35 0.23 0.19 0.23T2F1 NPS 0.25 0.30 0.30 0.19 0.24 0.23

26

0.1

0.2

0.3



Mea

n he

ight

PA

I (m

/yr)

Figure 14. Unadjusted arithmetic average height periodic annual increment (PAI) over a 17-year period. 5.2.4 Basal area The stand basal area and basal area PAI unadjusted treatment means are displayed in Tables 27 and 28, respectively. The stand basal area ranged from 34.0 m2/ha to 40.2 m2/ha 17 years after treatment, and basal area PAI ranged from 0.92 m2/ha/yr to 1.27 m2/ha/yr (Figures 15 and 16). The basal area is lower in the T2F1 NP treatment presumably because of the relatively high mortality in this treatment (Table 20). Table 27. Unadjusted stand basal area averages (m2/ha) by treatment and year after treatment.


(before) 0

(after) 1 2 3 10 17

T2F0 42.9 18.4 18.9 19.7 20.4 27.2 34.0 T2F1 N 45.5 18.7 19.8 21.6 23.0 31.2 39.9 T2F1 NP 41.2 18.7 19.7 20.8 22.1 28.9 35.6 T2F1 NPS 44.4 18.5 19.5 21.3 22.7 30.8 40.2

27

32.0

34.0

36.0

38.0

40.0

42.0



Stan

d ba

sal a

rea

(m2/

ha)

Figure 15. Unadjusted stand basal area means 17 years after treatment. There was high mortality in the T2F1 NP treatment. Table 28. Stand basal area periodic annual increment means (m2/ha//yr) by treatment and period.


T2F0 0.50 0.75 0.70 0.97 0.98 0.92T2F1 N 1.10 1.80 1.45 1.17 1.24 1.25T2F1 NP 0.95 1.15 1.25 0.97 0.96 0.99T2F1 NPS 1.00 1.80 1.40 1.16 1.34 1.27

28

0.6

0.9

1.2

1.5



Stan

d ba

sal a

rea

PAI (

m2/

ha/y

r)

Figure 16. Unadjusted stand basal area periodic annual increment (PAI) over a 17-year period. There was high mortality in the T2F1 NP treatment. 5.2.5 Total volume The stand total volume and total volume PAI unadjusted treatment means are displayed in Tables 29 and 30, respectively. The stand total volume ranged from 265.4 m3/ha to 330.0 m3/ha 17 years after treatment, and the total volume PAI ranged from 8.39 m3/ha/yr to 12.16 m3/ha/yr (Figures 17 and 18). Table 29. Unadjusted stand total volume means (m3/ha) by treatment and year after treatment.


(before) 0

(after) 1 2 3 10 17

T2F0 270.2 122.8 127.2 133.0 138.1 195.2 265.4 T2F1 N 289.0 124.5 133.2 147.4 160.1 235.4 327.0 T2F1 NP 267.8 128.3 136.4 146.8 158.0 219.2 296.1 T2F1 NPS 277.1 123.3 131.7 145.6 157.5 229.5 330.0

29

250

300

350



Tota

l vol

ume

(m3/

ha)

Figure 17. Unadjusted stand total volume means 17 years after treatment. There was high mortality in the T2F1 NP treatment. Table 30. Stand total volume periodic annual increment means (m3/ha/yr) by treatment and period.


T2F0 4.35 5.80 5.10 8.16 10.03 8.39T2F1 N 8.70 14.25 12.70 10.75 13.09 11.91T2F1 NP 8.05 10.40 11.20 8.75 10.98 9.87T2F1 NPS 8.45 13.90 11.85 10.29 14.36 12.16

30

6.0

9.0

12.0

15.0



Tota

l vol

ume

PAI (

m3/

ha/y

r)

Figure 18. Unadjusted stand total volume periodic annual increment over a 17-year period. There was high mortality in the T2F1 NP treatment. 5.2.6 Merchantable volume The stand merchantable volume and merchantable volume PAI unadjusted treatment means are displayed in Tables 31 and 32, respectively. The stand merchantable volume ranged from 236.7 m3/ha to 298.4 m3/ha 17 years after treatment, and the total volume PAI ranged from 8.55 m3/ha/yr to 12.17 m3/ha/yr (Figures 19 and 20). Table 31. Unadjusted stand merchantable volume means (m3/ha) by treatment and year after treatment.


(before) 0

(after) 1 2 3 10 17

T2F0 144.8 91.4 96.6 104.0 109.2 167.2 236.7 T2F1 N 166.8 94.1 102.6 117.3 130.8 206.2 295.9 T2F1 NP 152.2 94.7 106.1 118.9 130.1 192.5 268.4 T2F1 NPS 161.5 91.6 100.9 116.4 128.7 200.6 298.4

31

230

250

270

290

310



Mer

ch. V

olum

e (m

3/ha

)

Figure 19. Unadjusted stand merchantable volume means 17 years after treatment. There was high mortality in the T2F1 NP treatment. Table 32. Stand merchantable volume periodic annual increment means (m3/ha/yr) by treatment and period.


T2F0 5.25 7.35 5.20 8.29 9.94 8.55T2F1 N 8.55 14.70 13.45 10.77 12.81 11.87T2F1 NP 11.35 12.80 11.25 8.91 10.84 10.22T2F1 NPS 9.30 15.55 12.25 10.28 13.97 12.17

32

6.0

9.0

12.0

15.0



Mer

ch. v

olum

e PA

I (m

3/ha

/yr)

Figure 20. Unadjusted average diameter periodic growth over a 17-year period. There was high mortality in the T2F1 NP treatment.

33

6. CONCLUSIONS This report has provided the SUB1 and SUB3 plot data summaries and unadjusted treatment means. No statistical comparison of treatment means was done due to insufficient funds. The data summaries can be used by growth modelers to calibrate growth models and to compare and statistically adjust the treatment means in the future.

34

7. LITERATURE CITED Brix, H. 1993. Fertilization and thinning effect on a Douglas-fir ecosystem at Shawnigan Lake: A synthesis of project results. FRDA Rep. No. 196. Barclay, H. and H. Brix, 1984. Effects of urea and ammonium nitrate fertilizer on growth of a young thinned and unthinned Douglas-fir stands. Can. J. For. Res. 14:952-955. Barclay, H. and H. Brix, 1985. Effects of high levels of fertilization with urea on growth of thinned and unthinned Douglas-fir stands. Can. J. For. Res. 15:730-733. Brix, H. 1993. Fertilization and thinning effect on a Douglas-fir ecosystem at Shawnigan Lake: A synthesis of project results. FRDA Rep. No. 196. Bruce, D. 1981. Consistent height-growth and growth-rate estimates for remeasured plots. For. Sci. 27(4):711-725. Gardner, E.R. 1990. Fertilization and thinning effects on a Douglas-fir ecosystem at Shawnigan Lake: 15-year growth response. Information Report BC-X-319, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre. McWilliams, E.R.G. and G. Therien. 1996 (revised 1997). Fertilization and thinning effect on a Douglas-fir ecosystem at Shawnigan Lake: 24-year growth response. FRDA Rep. No. 269. Omule, A.Y. 2008. British Columbia Forest Science Program. Project Y081189: Analysis and reporting of the Shawnigan Lake fertilizer and thinning experiment. Fertilization and thinning effects on a Douglas-fir Ecosystem at Shawnigan Lake: 32-year growth response. Available at the British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range Library, Victoria, BC. Omule, S.A.Y., V.E. Fletcher, and K.R. Polsson. 1987. Total and merchantable volume equations for small coastal Douglas-fir. FRDA Rep. No. 010.

35

8. APPENDIX I: SUB1 STUDY PLOT SUMMARIES 8.1 STAND SUMMARIES THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1972) PLOT 23 TREATMENT T0F2 AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 100.2 21.2 22.5 13.2 3630 8.9 25 0 STANDING 100.2 21.2 22.5 13.2 3630 8.9 28 3 MORTALITY 1.3 0.0 0.4 15.7 148 5.6 28 3 STANDING 157.1 63.0 30.1 15.7 3481 10.5 31 6 MORTALITY 11.2 4.5 2.5 19.5 667 7.0 31 6 STANDING 203.7 116.6 34.0 19.5 2815 12.4 34 9 MORTALITY 9.2 3.7 1.9 21.1 444 7.4 34 9 STANDING 247.3 169.4 37.6 21.1 2370 14.2 37 12 MORTALITY 7.7 0.0 1.5 19.9 370 7.2 37 12 STANDING 304.8 230.6 43.2 19.9 2000 16.6 40 15 MORTALITY 10.8 6.4 1.5 21.8 123 12.5 40 15 STANDING 357.2 283.6 46.7 21.8 1877 17.8 43 18 MORTALITY 15.8 6.4 2.2 24.3 198 11.9 43 18 STANDING 408.5 339.6 48.9 24.3 1679 19.3 49 24 MORTALITY 8.5 1.7 1.1 27.2 99 12.1 49 24 STANDING 496.3 430.5 54.7 27.2 1580 21.0 56 32 MORTALITY 16.4 11.1 1.9 30.4 99 15.6 56 32 STANDING 595.1 529.8 60.1 30.4 1481 22.7 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1972) PLOT 26 TREATMENT T0F1 AN ----------------------------------------------------------------------

36

TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 67.3 5.8 16.5 12.5 3506 7.7 25 0 STANDING 67.3 5.8 16.5 12.5 3506 7.7 28 3 MORTALITY 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.7 25 4.1 28 3 STANDING 115.0 27.4 23.7 14.7 3481 9.3 31 6 MORTALITY 0.2 0.0 0.1 17.1 49 4.7 31 6 STANDING 154.1 52.2 28.3 17.1 3432 10.2 34 9 MORTALITY 0.3 0.0 0.1 18.5 49 5.5 34 9 STANDING 189.7 75.9 32.4 18.5 3383 11.0 37 12 MORTALITY 0.5 0.0 0.2 16.2 99 4.7 37 12 STANDING 222.8 118.8 39.3 16.2 3284 12.3 40 15 MORTALITY 4.8 0.0 0.9 21.7 272 6.5 40 15 STANDING 323.5 194.8 43.1 21.7 3012 13.5 43 18 MORTALITY 8.6 0.0 1.8 20.1 444 7.1 43 18 STANDING 313.1 207.2 45.2 20.1 2568 15.0 49 24 MORTALITY 11.2 1.3 1.7 22.5 247 9.4 49 24 STANDING 380.3 281.3 49.5 22.5 2321 16.5 56 32 MORTALITY 15.4 6.6 2.0 24.8 173 12.2 56 32 STANDING 454.6 359.5 54.2 24.8 2148 17.9 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1972) PLOT 27 TREATMENT T0F2 AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 88.0 18.5 20.5 14.6 4074 8.0 25 0 STANDING 88.0 18.5 20.5 14.6 4074 8.0 28 3 MORTALITY 0.3 0.0 0.3 16.8 321 3.5 28 3 STANDING 147.1 47.0 28.7 16.8 3753 9.9 31 6 MORTALITY 2.4 0.0 0.8 21.1 370 5.3 31 6 STANDING 200.1 91.5 34.4 21.1 3383 11.4 34 9 MORTALITY 1.9 0.0 0.6 22.6 222 5.9 34 9 STANDING 245.2 136.4 39.0 22.6 3160 12.5 37 12 MORTALITY 6.1 0.0 1.2 20.5 321 6.9

37

37 12 STANDING 307.6 198.9 44.9 20.5 2840 14.2 40 15 MORTALITY 13.5 0.0 2.3 22.5 420 8.3 40 15 STANDING 357.3 259.6 47.8 22.5 2420 15.9 43 18 MORTALITY 16.9 1.1 2.7 21.9 395 9.4 43 18 STANDING 373.7 293.5 49.8 21.9 2025 17.7 49 24 MORTALITY 5.3 0.0 0.8 24.5 99 10.0 49 24 STANDING 461.2 380.1 55.7 24.5 1926 19.2 56 32 MORTALITY 14.2 0.0 2.0 26.5 222 10.7 56 32 STANDING 544.0 474.3 61.4 26.5 1704 21.4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1972) PLOT 32 TREATMENT T2F3 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 84.4 14.8 19.6 13.3 3531 8.4 25 0 STANDING 37.1 8.2 7.8 13.3 840 10.9 25 0 THINNINGS 47.3 6.6 11.8 13.3 2691 7.5 28 3 STANDING 77.1 50.4 14.0 15.8 840 14.6 31 6 STANDING 116.8 93.7 20.1 17.1 840 17.5 34 9 STANDING 163.3 138.5 25.5 18.6 840 19.7 37 12 STANDING 210.6 184.9 30.4 19.7 840 21.5 40 15 STANDING 260.5 232.5 34.5 21.3 840 22.9 43 18 STANDING 302.3 272.6 37.9 22.7 840 24.0 49 24 STANDING 392.4 359.4 44.2 26.1 840 25.9 56 32 MORTALITY 10.8 8.6 1.2 27.7 49 17.8 56 32 STANDING 484.2 450.0 50.2 27.7 790 28.4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm.

38

6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1972) PLOT 36 TREATMENT T0F1 AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 95.6 27.1 21.2 15.0 3383 8.9 25 0 STANDING 95.6 27.1 21.2 15.0 3383 8.9 28 3 MORTALITY 1.3 0.0 0.4 17.8 123 6.2 28 3 STANDING 146.7 62.5 28.0 17.8 3259 10.5 31 6 MORTALITY 3.8 0.0 1.1 22.0 395 5.8 31 6 STANDING 186.3 99.6 31.1 22.0 2864 11.8 34 9 MORTALITY 2.4 0.0 0.6 23.8 173 6.6 34 9 STANDING 225.7 136.4 34.9 23.8 2691 12.8 37 12 MORTALITY 6.1 0.0 1.6 17.8 519 6.2 37 12 STANDING 233.5 159.2 39.2 17.8 2173 15.2 40 15 MORTALITY 16.8 7.8 2.4 24.2 247 11.0 40 15 STANDING 323.5 239.4 40.9 24.2 1926 16.4 43 18 MORTALITY 17.8 0.0 2.5 26.1 346 9.7 43 18 STANDING 348.6 278.4 41.6 26.1 1580 18.3 49 24 MORTALITY 13.9 1.3 1.9 28.5 198 10.9 49 24 STANDING 407.2 346.8 45.4 28.5 1383 20.4 56 32 MORTALITY 42.6 28.0 5.0 30.4 272 15.3 56 32 STANDING 444.8 397.2 46.8 30.4 1111 23.2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008.

39

THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1972) PLOT 46 TREATMENT T2F3 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 111.1 17.1 24.6 13.2 3728 9.2 25 0 STANDING 36.4 5.6 7.8 13.2 889 10.6 25 0 THINNINGS 74.7 11.5 16.8 13.2 2840 8.7 28 3 STANDING 74.0 45.6 14.1 14.8 889 14.2 31 6 STANDING 117.1 90.7 20.4 16.0 889 17.1 34 9 STANDING 166.5 140.6 26.2 17.7 889 19.4 37 12 MORTALITY 1.2 0.0 0.2 19.0 25 10.5 37 12 STANDING 215.2 188.9 31.1 19.0 864 21.4 40 15 STANDING 268.8 240.2 35.6 20.7 864 22.9 43 18 STANDING 312.4 282.2 39.2 22.0 864 24.0 49 24 STANDING 445.1 408.3 45.7 29.7 864 26.0 56 32 MORTALITY 13.6 11.5 1.4 29.5 49 19.1 56 32 STANDING 531.4 493.4 51.1 29.5 815 28.3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 47 TREATMENT T2F6 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 126.4 24.9 27.7 13.8 4642 8.7 25 0 STANDING 41.2 11.8 8.3 13.8 840 11.2 25 0 THINNINGS 85.2 13.1 19.4 13.8 3802 8.1 28 3 STANDING 77.4 50.6 14.3 15.7 840 14.7 31 6 STANDING 123.7 99.7 20.8 17.6 840 17.7 34 9 STANDING 184.4 159.3 27.3 19.7 840 20.3 37 12 STANDING 221.9 196.6 32.1 20.2 840 22.1 40 15 STANDING 290.9 261.4 36.1 23.3 840 23.4

40

43 18 STANDING 336.5 305.4 39.6 24.7 840 24.5 49 24 STANDING 423.0 388.4 45.0 27.3 840 26.1 56 32 MORTALITY 5.9 4.9 0.7 30.1 25 18.6 56 32 STANDING 518.1 481.4 51.3 30.1 815 28.3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 48 TREATMENT T2F2 AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 104.9 15.4 24.8 13.0 4864 8.1 25 0 STANDING 39.5 6.9 8.5 13.0 1012 10.3 25 0 THINNINGS 65.4 8.4 16.3 13.0 3852 7.3 28 3 STANDING 83.0 52.5 15.8 15.0 1012 14.1 31 6 STANDING 127.3 98.1 22.2 16.2 1012 16.7 34 9 STANDING 183.5 154.3 28.2 18.3 1012 18.8 37 12 STANDING 218.2 189.3 33.1 18.3 1012 20.4 40 15 STANDING 288.4 255.0 37.5 21.7 1012 21.7 43 18 STANDING 338.3 303.0 41.4 23.2 1012 22.8 49 24 STANDING 417.9 380.2 47.9 25.0 1012 24.5 56 32 MORTALITY 13.5 11.6 1.5 28.0 49 19.6 56 32 STANDING 536.3 495.8 55.2 28.0 963 27.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008.

41

THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 49 TREATMENT T1F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 129.9 34.7 26.8 15.3 3901 9.4 25 0 STANDING 78.5 15.6 15.9 15.3 1901 10.3 25 0 THINNINGS 51.4 19.1 10.9 15.3 2000 8.3 28 3 MORTALITY 0.7 0.0 0.2 15.4 25 8.8 28 3 STANDING 138.0 72.2 24.5 15.4 1877 12.9 31 6 MORTALITY 4.8 0.9 0.9 17.1 99 10.6 31 6 STANDING 193.2 129.1 31.2 17.1 1778 15.0 34 9 MORTALITY 0.5 0.0 0.1 19.7 49 6.0 34 9 STANDING 268.4 206.0 38.6 19.7 1728 16.9 37 12 MORTALITY 1.1 0.0 0.2 19.4 49 7.5 37 12 STANDING 308.3 247.9 43.8 19.4 1679 18.2 40 15 MORTALITY 1.8 0.0 0.2 21.8 25 11.3 40 15 STANDING 365.9 301.7 47.6 21.8 1654 19.1 43 18 MORTALITY 1.4 0.0 0.2 23.6 25 9.9 43 18 STANDING 427.5 360.9 50.5 23.6 1630 19.9 49 24 MORTALITY 1.6 0.0 0.2 25.4 25 10.4 49 24 STANDING 507.7 440.3 56.3 25.4 1605 21.1 56 32 MORTALITY 35.2 25.4 3.9 27.7 198 15.9 56 32 STANDING 582.6 520.7 59.9 27.7 1407 23.3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 50 TREATMENT T0F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH

42

(yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 125.7 41.5 24.9 14.1 3111 10.1 25 0 STANDING 125.7 41.5 24.9 14.1 3111 10.1 28 3 MORTALITY 0.9 0.0 0.2 16.5 74 6.5 28 3 STANDING 191.6 96.7 32.8 16.5 3037 11.7 31 6 MORTALITY 14.8 1.5 3.0 18.2 741 7.2 31 6 STANDING 234.3 152.4 36.3 18.2 2296 14.2 34 9 MORTALITY 6.0 0.0 1.1 20.2 247 7.5 34 9 STANDING 302.0 222.2 41.8 20.2 2049 16.1 37 12 MORTALITY 1.4 0.0 0.3 20.6 74 6.8 37 12 STANDING 339.7 264.3 46.3 20.6 1975 17.3 40 15 MORTALITY 8.5 0.0 1.3 23.2 173 9.8 40 15 STANDING 398.9 328.3 48.8 23.2 1802 18.6 43 18 MORTALITY 8.9 1.2 1.2 24.5 123 11.2 43 18 STANDING 433.0 367.2 50.4 24.5 1679 19.6 49 24 MORTALITY 2.9 1.8 0.4 26.1 25 13.6 49 24 STANDING 508.1 440.0 55.5 26.1 1654 20.7 56 32 MORTALITY 25.6 15.5 3.0 27.3 198 13.9 56 32 STANDING 595.0 532.4 59.8 27.3 1457 22.9 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 51 TREATMENT T2F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 106.1 32.4 22.2 13.6 2642 10.3 25 0 STANDING 42.1 11.3 8.6 13.6 815 11.6 25 0 THINNINGS 64.1 21.1 13.6 13.6 1827 9.7 28 3 MORTALITY 1.1 0.0 0.2 14.5 25 10.8 28 3 STANDING 80.9 57.1 14.5 14.5 790 15.3 31 6 STANDING 125.1 101.5 20.4 16.2 790 18.2 34 9 STANDING 184.0 159.5 26.6 17.7 790 20.7 37 12 MORTALITY 1.3 0.0 0.2 19.5 25 10.9 37 12 STANDING 220.3 196.7 31.2 19.5 765 22.8 40 15 STANDING 295.8 267.7 35.0 23.7 765 24.1 43 18 STANDING 342.7 312.5 37.9 25.6 765 25.1

43

49 24 STANDING 419.9 386.8 43.0 28.0 765 26.7 56 32 STANDING 537.1 499.8 49.7 31.2 765 28.8 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 52 TREATMENT T2F2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 106.8 35.3 22.8 13.9 3037 9.8 25 0 STANDING 40.2 13.1 8.3 13.9 815 11.4 25 0 THINNINGS 66.6 22.2 14.6 13.9 2222 9.1 28 3 STANDING 85.4 59.8 15.2 15.9 815 15.4 31 6 STANDING 132.0 107.8 21.2 18.1 815 18.2 34 9 STANDING 193.5 167.0 27.7 20.1 815 20.8 37 12 MORTALITY 1.3 0.0 0.2 20.2 25 10.8 37 12 STANDING 233.4 208.7 32.7 20.2 790 23.0 40 15 STANDING 308.2 279.0 36.7 23.6 790 24.3 43 18 STANDING 356.9 325.9 40.2 25.5 790 25.4 49 24 STANDING 446.1 411.6 45.6 28.0 790 27.1 56 32 MORTALITY 34.2 30.6 3.2 31.0 74 23.6 56 32 STANDING 537.6 502.1 49.6 31.0 716 29.7 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008.

44

THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 53 TREATMENT T0F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 101.4 24.7 23.3 12.2 4049 8.6 25 0 STANDING 101.4 24.7 23.3 12.2 4049 8.6 28 3 MORTALITY 2.2 0.0 0.6 14.5 198 6.2 28 3 STANDING 164.3 65.4 31.8 14.5 3852 10.2 31 6 MORTALITY 13.0 0.0 3.1 16.1 963 6.4 31 6 STANDING 209.2 118.0 35.8 16.1 2889 12.6 34 9 MORTALITY 5.7 0.0 1.3 18.2 420 6.2 34 9 STANDING 275.2 185.4 41.8 18.2 2469 14.7 37 12 MORTALITY 3.0 0.0 0.6 18.7 148 7.1 37 12 STANDING 312.1 228.8 46.5 18.7 2321 16.0 40 15 MORTALITY 10.1 0.0 1.7 21.5 321 8.1 40 15 STANDING 379.5 298.9 49.1 21.5 2000 17.7 43 18 MORTALITY 10.5 2.6 1.4 23.0 173 10.2 43 18 STANDING 420.4 341.6 50.8 23.0 1827 18.8 49 24 MORTALITY 9.4 1.4 1.2 25.1 123 11.2 49 24 STANDING 493.1 419.1 55.5 25.1 1704 20.4 56 32 MORTALITY 25.1 18.2 2.7 27.8 123 16.7 56 32 STANDING 585.5 513.8 60.4 27.8 1580 22.1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 54 TREATMENT T2F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ----------------------------------------------------------------------

45

25 0 PRE-THIN 107.6 14.6 24.9 12.8 4173 8.7 25 0 STANDING 41.0 6.0 8.7 12.8 864 11.3 25 0 THINNINGS 66.6 8.6 16.2 12.8 3309 7.9 28 3 STANDING 84.1 59.0 15.7 14.3 864 15.2 31 6 STANDING 132.7 109.6 22.5 15.8 864 18.2 34 9 STANDING 196.7 171.7 29.5 18.2 864 20.9 37 12 STANDING 238.8 213.4 35.0 19.0 864 22.7 40 15 STANDING 313.9 284.3 39.4 22.2 864 24.1 43 18 STANDING 368.0 336.1 43.2 23.9 864 25.2 49 24 STANDING 448.8 414.2 49.1 26.3 864 26.9 56 32 STANDING 561.2 523.2 57.0 28.4 864 29.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 55 TREATMENT T2F2 AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 102.9 32.4 21.4 13.4 2642 10.2 25 0 STANDING 44.8 13.3 9.0 13.4 840 11.7 25 0 THINNINGS 58.1 19.1 12.4 13.4 1802 9.4 28 3 MORTALITY 2.3 0.0 0.5 15.8 74 9.4 28 3 STANDING 87.0 64.1 15.2 15.8 765 15.9 31 6 MORTALITY 0.7 0.0 0.2 17.4 25 9.1 31 6 STANDING 130.6 109.4 20.7 17.4 741 18.9 34 9 STANDING 188.7 165.8 26.8 19.7 741 21.4 37 12 STANDING 224.3 201.2 31.3 19.7 741 23.2 40 15 STANDING 285.4 259.0 34.8 22.7 741 24.5 43 18 STANDING 327.1 299.1 37.8 24.2 741 25.5 49 24 STANDING 406.4 375.3 42.7 27.0 741 27.1 56 32 STANDING 510.1 475.6 49.3 30.2 741 29.1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm.

46

4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 57 TREATMENT T2F2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 103.7 34.1 20.9 13.1 2444 10.4 25 0 STANDING 41.4 11.2 8.2 13.1 741 11.8 25 0 THINNINGS 62.3 22.9 12.7 13.1 1704 9.7 28 3 STANDING 79.8 57.9 13.8 15.3 741 15.4 31 6 STANDING 115.6 93.6 18.4 17.0 741 17.8 34 9 STANDING 161.6 137.6 23.0 19.3 741 19.9 37 12 STANDING 190.7 167.7 26.8 19.1 741 21.5 40 15 STANDING 241.9 215.9 29.9 22.2 741 22.7 43 18 STANDING 277.2 249.8 32.6 23.4 741 23.7 49 24 STANDING 339.1 309.6 37.1 25.2 741 25.3 56 32 STANDING 433.0 400.3 43.4 30.4 741 27.3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 58 TREATMENT T2F6 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN

47

AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 116.0 20.9 25.2 13.4 4173 8.8 25 0 STANDING 43.9 10.2 8.8 13.4 840 11.5 25 0 THINNINGS 72.2 10.7 16.4 13.4 3333 7.9 28 3 MORTALITY 0.6 0.0 0.2 14.8 25 8.9 28 3 STANDING 81.9 56.6 15.0 14.8 815 15.3 31 6 STANDING 132.0 109.8 22.1 16.5 815 18.6 34 9 STANDING 197.2 173.1 29.1 18.8 815 21.3 37 12 MORTALITY 3.4 2.7 0.5 18.9 25 16.6 37 12 STANDING 234.5 211.0 34.1 18.9 790 23.4 40 15 STANDING 306.5 279.1 38.5 21.8 790 24.9 43 18 STANDING 360.7 331.3 42.6 23.2 790 26.2 49 24 STANDING 454.0 421.3 48.9 25.4 790 28.1 56 32 STANDING 574.6 538.2 57.1 28.4 790 30.3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 59 TREATMENT T1F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 117.4 13.3 27.1 12.4 4617 8.6 25 0 STANDING 74.0 11.6 16.1 12.4 1951 10.2 25 0 THINNINGS 43.4 1.7 11.0 12.4 2667 7.2 28 3 MORTALITY 0.8 0.0 0.2 14.6 25 9.6 28 3 STANDING 129.7 62.3 24.6 14.6 1926 12.7 31 6 STANDING 184.9 120.9 32.1 16.2 1926 14.6 34 9 MORTALITY 1.1 0.0 0.2 18.2 49 7.5 34 9 STANDING 253.6 188.4 39.3 18.2 1877 16.3 37 12 STANDING 294.0 231.8 45.1 17.9 1877 17.5 40 15 MORTALITY 5.3 1.2 0.8 21.0 99 10.4 40 15 STANDING 364.2 299.2 48.6 21.0 1778 18.7 43 18 MORTALITY 2.5 0.0 0.4 22.6 49 10.0 43 18 STANDING 414.7 348.7 51.8 22.6 1728 19.5 49 24 MORTALITY 2.0 0.0 0.3 24.6 25 12.0 49 24 STANDING 488.0 421.0 57.3 24.6 1704 20.7

48

56 32 MORTALITY 13.3 6.4 1.7 26.5 123 13.3 56 32 STANDING 570.6 506.9 63.0 26.5 1580 22.5 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 60 TREATMENT T2F2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 0 PRE-THIN 103.5 15.7 23.7 12.0 3679 9.1 25 0 STANDING 37.9 5.7 8.2 12.0 840 11.1 25 0 THINNINGS 65.6 10.1 15.5 12.0 2840 8.3 28 3 STANDING 79.2 55.4 15.2 13.6 840 15.2 31 6 STANDING 116.9 95.0 20.7 15.0 840 17.7 34 9 STANDING 165.1 141.6 26.1 17.1 840 19.9 37 12 STANDING 195.8 172.4 30.6 17.1 840 21.5 40 15 STANDING 254.0 227.1 34.4 19.6 840 22.8 43 18 STANDING 300.0 270.7 37.4 20.8 840 23.8 49 24 STANDING 355.7 325.2 42.4 24.0 840 25.4 56 32 STANDING 455.4 421.7 50.0 27.1 840 27.5 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008.

49

8.2 STAND AND STOCK TABLES THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1972) PLOT 23 TREAT T0F2 AN ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 3.0 0.0 1457 25 PRE-THIN 10 13.7 0.0 1827 25 PRE-THIN 15 5.1 17.5 321 25 PRE-THIN 20 0.8 3.7 25 25 STANDING 5 3.0 0.0 1457 25 STANDING 10 13.7 0.0 1827 25 STANDING 15 5.1 17.5 321 25 STANDING 20 0.8 3.7 25 28 MORTALITY 5 0.2 0.0 123 28 MORTALITY 10 0.1 0.0 25 28 STANDING 5 2.4 0.0 1160 28 STANDING 10 12.3 0.0 1457 28 STANDING 15 12.6 48.0 765 28 STANDING 20 2.9 15.0 99 31 MORTALITY 5 0.8 0.0 494 31 MORTALITY 10 0.8 0.0 123 31 MORTALITY 15 1.0 4.5 49 31 STANDING 5 1.5 0.0 642 31 STANDING 10 8.2 0.0 938 31 STANDING 15 14.8 58.9 914 31 STANDING 20 8.4 48.7 296 31 STANDING 25 1.2 8.2 25 34 MORTALITY 5 0.8 0.0 346 34 MORTALITY 10 0.4 0.0 49 34 MORTALITY 15 0.8 3.7 49 34 STANDING 5 0.8 0.0 296 34 STANDING 10 5.1 0.0 617 34 STANDING 15 17.1 74.7 1012 34 STANDING 20 11.3 69.6 370 34 STANDING 25 3.5 25.1 74 37 MORTALITY 5 0.7 0.0 247 37 MORTALITY 10 0.8 0.0 123 37 STANDING 5 0.0 0.0 25 37 STANDING 10 3.5 0.0 420 37 STANDING 15 15.2 73.2 864 37 STANDING 20 14.9 91.9 494 37 STANDING 25 9.5 64.4 198 40 MORTALITY 10 0.4 0.0 74 40 MORTALITY 15 0.4 1.8 25 40 MORTALITY 20 0.7 4.6 25 40 STANDING 5 0.0 0.0 25 40 STANDING 10 2.9 0.0 321 40 STANDING 15 13.5 71.5 741 40 STANDING 20 13.3 87.7 444 40 STANDING 25 13.7 99.5 296 40 STANDING 30 3.3 24.8 49

50

43 MORTALITY 10 1.2 0.0 148 43 MORTALITY 15 0.4 1.6 25 43 MORTALITY 20 0.7 4.8 25 43 STANDING 5 0.0 0.0 25 43 STANDING 10 1.8 0.0 173 43 STANDING 15 12.9 74.8 667 43 STANDING 20 13.1 94.4 420 43 STANDING 25 15.9 126.6 321 43 STANDING 30 5.2 43.9 74 49 MORTALITY 10 0.8 0.0 74 49 MORTALITY 15 0.4 1.7 25 49 STANDING 5 0.0 0.0 25 49 STANDING 10 0.8 0.0 74 49 STANDING 15 6.9 40.2 395 49 STANDING 20 16.9 126.8 568 49 STANDING 25 14.5 123.0 296 49 STANDING 30 13.3 118.6 198 49 STANDING 35 2.3 21.8 25 56 MORTALITY 10 0.3 0.0 25 56 MORTALITY 15 0.8 4.1 49 56 MORTALITY 20 0.8 7.0 25 56 STANDING 5 0.0 0.0 25 56 STANDING 10 0.5 0.0 49 56 STANDING 15 6.5 40.7 346 56 STANDING 20 13.0 105.2 420 56 STANDING 25 15.8 143.1 321 56 STANDING 30 15.3 147.8 222 56 STANDING 35 6.4 64.3 74 56 STANDING 40 2.8 28.7 25 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1972) PLOT 26 TREAT T0F1 AN ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 5.1 0.0 2000 25 PRE-THIN 10 9.6 0.0 1383

51

25 PRE-THIN 15 1.8 5.8 123 25 STANDING 5 5.1 0.0 2000 25 STANDING 10 9.6 0.0 1383 25 STANDING 15 1.8 5.8 123 28 MORTALITY 5 0.0 0.0 25 28 STANDING 5 3.4 0.0 1259 28 STANDING 10 12.8 0.0 1753 28 STANDING 15 6.8 24.2 444 28 STANDING 20 0.6 3.2 25 31 MORTALITY 5 0.1 0.0 49 31 STANDING 5 2.4 0.0 889 31 STANDING 10 13.7 0.0 1827 31 STANDING 15 10.2 40.1 642 31 STANDING 20 2.0 11.2 74 34 MORTALITY 5 0.1 0.0 49 34 STANDING 5 1.9 0.0 716 34 STANDING 10 14.7 0.0 1827 34 STANDING 15 12.3 54.7 716 34 STANDING 20 3.5 21.2 123 37 MORTALITY 5 0.2 0.0 99 37 STANDING 5 1.6 0.0 568 37 STANDING 10 10.9 0.0 1358 37 STANDING 15 17.8 68.5 1062 37 STANDING 20 7.9 41.3 272 37 STANDING 25 1.1 6.4 25 40 MORTALITY 5 0.7 0.0 247 40 MORTALITY 10 0.2 0.0 25 40 STANDING 5 0.8 0.0 296 40 STANDING 10 10.4 0.0 1259 40 STANDING 15 16.4 86.6 963 40 STANDING 20 14.2 98.1 469 40 STANDING 25 1.3 10.1 25 43 MORTALITY 5 0.6 0.0 247 43 MORTALITY 10 1.2 0.0 198 43 STANDING 5 0.1 0.0 25 43 STANDING 10 8.4 0.0 963 43 STANDING 15 17.1 80.9 988 43 STANDING 20 15.0 93.4 494 43 STANDING 25 4.6 31.8 99 49 MORTALITY 5 0.1 0.0 25 49 MORTALITY 10 1.3 0.0 198 49 MORTALITY 15 0.3 1.3 25 49 STANDING 10 5.1 0.0 568 49 STANDING 15 17.1 89.6 988 49 STANDING 20 16.4 110.6 543 49 STANDING 25 9.2 67.8 198 49 STANDING 30 1.7 13.2 25 56 MORTALITY 10 0.8 0.0 99 56 MORTALITY 15 1.2 6.6 74 56 STANDING 10 3.8 0.0 420 56 STANDING 15 10.4 55.0 642 56 STANDING 20 23.1 166.3 765 56 STANDING 25 13.3 106.7 272 56 STANDING 30 3.7 31.5 49 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm.

52

4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1972) PLOT 27 TREAT T0F2 AN ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 5.0 0.0 2173 25 PRE-THIN 10 10.8 0.0 1654 25 PRE-THIN 15 3.0 9.9 198 25 PRE-THIN 20 1.7 8.6 49 25 STANDING 5 5.0 0.0 2173 25 STANDING 10 10.8 0.0 1654 25 STANDING 15 3.0 9.9 198 25 STANDING 20 1.7 8.6 49 28 MORTALITY 5 0.3 0.0 321 28 STANDING 5 3.3 0.0 1235 28 STANDING 10 14.7 0.0 1975 28 STANDING 15 6.7 22.6 420 28 STANDING 20 1.8 8.7 74 28 STANDING 25 2.2 13.1 49 31 MORTALITY 5 0.5 0.0 321 31 MORTALITY 10 0.3 0.0 49 31 STANDING 5 2.0 0.0 667 31 STANDING 10 14.1 0.0 1827 31 STANDING 15 11.3 46.4 691 31 STANDING 20 4.3 24.8 148 31 STANDING 25 1.2 8.7 25 31 STANDING 30 1.5 11.6 25 34 MORTALITY 5 0.3 0.0 173 34 MORTALITY 10 0.3 0.0 49 34 STANDING 5 1.5 0.0 444 34 STANDING 10 11.7 0.0 1506 34 STANDING 15 15.7 66.9 938 34 STANDING 20 6.9 43.3 222 34 STANDING 25 1.4 10.6 25 34 STANDING 30 1.7 13.8 25 37 MORTALITY 5 0.6 0.0 198 37 MORTALITY 10 0.6 0.0 123 37 STANDING 5 0.7 0.0 198 37 STANDING 10 8.6 0.0 1111 37 STANDING 15 17.4 80.5 1037 37 STANDING 20 10.1 61.9 346 37 STANDING 25 4.4 29.2 99

53

37 STANDING 30 1.6 11.3 25 37 STANDING 35 2.1 15.0 25 40 MORTALITY 5 0.6 0.0 148 40 MORTALITY 10 1.7 0.0 272 40 STANDING 5 0.1 0.0 49 40 STANDING 10 5.9 0.0 741 40 STANDING 15 17.6 88.2 1012 40 STANDING 20 13.7 91.2 444 40 STANDING 25 6.1 45.0 123 40 STANDING 30 1.8 14.0 25 40 STANDING 35 2.4 19.1 25 43 MORTALITY 5 0.1 0.0 49 43 MORTALITY 10 2.3 0.0 321 43 MORTALITY 15 0.3 0.0 25 43 STANDING 10 3.5 0.0 395 43 STANDING 15 16.2 84.4 889 43 STANDING 20 15.4 100.8 494 43 STANDING 25 8.2 58.5 173 43 STANDING 30 1.6 13.1 25 43 STANDING 35 2.1 15.2 25 43 STANDING 40 2.8 21.5 25 49 MORTALITY 10 0.8 0.0 99 49 STANDING 10 2.5 0.0 272 49 STANDING 15 12.1 66.8 667 49 STANDING 20 18.0 126.5 593 49 STANDING 25 11.0 84.6 247 49 STANDING 30 6.5 54.5 99 49 STANDING 35 2.3 19.5 25 49 STANDING 40 3.2 27.0 25 56 MORTALITY 10 2.0 0.0 222 56 STANDING 10 0.5 0.0 49 56 STANDING 15 8.8 50.8 494 56 STANDING 20 17.7 130.3 593 56 STANDING 25 18.7 153.9 395 56 STANDING 30 7.0 58.9 99 56 STANDING 35 2.3 22.2 25 56 STANDING 40 2.7 24.1 25 56 STANDING 45 3.7 34.0 25 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1972) PLOT 32 TREAT T2F3 UREA

54

----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 4.1 0.0 1679 25 PRE-THIN 10 11.6 0.0 1630 25 PRE-THIN 15 3.3 12.0 198 25 PRE-THIN 20 0.6 2.8 25 25 STANDING 5 0.1 0.0 49 25 STANDING 10 5.5 0.0 667 25 STANDING 15 1.6 5.4 99 25 STANDING 20 0.6 2.8 25 25 THINNINGS 5 3.9 0.0 1630 25 THINNINGS 10 6.1 0.0 963 25 THINNINGS 15 1.8 6.6 99 28 STANDING 5 0.1 0.0 25 28 STANDING 10 1.5 0.0 148 28 STANDING 15 9.9 36.6 593 28 STANDING 20 2.5 13.0 74 31 STANDING 10 0.4 0.0 49 31 STANDING 15 7.9 32.0 420 31 STANDING 20 9.3 46.3 321 31 STANDING 25 2.6 15.4 49 34 STANDING 10 0.4 0.0 49 34 STANDING 15 4.7 21.8 222 34 STANDING 20 13.0 71.1 420 34 STANDING 25 4.2 24.8 99 34 STANDING 30 3.2 20.8 49 37 STANDING 10 0.2 0.0 25 37 STANDING 15 2.5 12.7 123 37 STANDING 20 12.5 73.5 395 37 STANDING 25 11.4 72.9 247 37 STANDING 30 3.8 25.7 49 40 STANDING 10 0.2 0.0 25 40 STANDING 15 0.9 5.0 49 40 STANDING 20 12.0 76.6 370 40 STANDING 25 15.6 108.5 321 40 STANDING 30 1.6 11.2 25 40 STANDING 35 4.2 31.2 49 43 STANDING 10 0.2 0.0 25 43 STANDING 15 0.4 1.9 25 43 STANDING 20 10.7 72.1 321 43 STANDING 25 15.8 115.3 321 43 STANDING 30 6.2 47.1 99 43 STANDING 35 4.6 36.3 49 49 STANDING 10 0.2 0.0 25 49 STANDING 15 0.4 2.0 25 49 STANDING 20 4.9 36.1 148 49 STANDING 25 16.5 132.7 346 49 STANDING 30 16.8 141.1 247 49 STANDING 35 5.3 47.5 49 56 MORTALITY 10 0.2 0.0 25 56 MORTALITY 25 1.0 8.6 25 56 STANDING 15 0.4 2.2 25 56 STANDING 20 4.5 36.1 123 56 STANDING 25 12.9 112.4 247 56 STANDING 30 19.4 178.2 272

55

56 STANDING 35 6.7 62.8 74 56 STANDING 40 6.2 58.2 49 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1972) PLOT 36 TREAT T0F1 AN ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 3.3 0.0 1457 25 PRE-THIN 10 10.8 0.0 1531 25 PRE-THIN 15 5.1 15.6 346 25 PRE-THIN 25 2.1 10.7 49 25 STANDING 5 3.3 0.0 1457 25 STANDING 10 10.8 0.0 1531 25 STANDING 15 5.1 15.6 346 25 STANDING 25 2.1 10.7 49 28 MORTALITY 5 0.2 0.0 99 28 MORTALITY 10 0.2 0.0 25 28 STANDING 5 2.7 0.0 1111 28 STANDING 10 11.1 0.0 1432 28 STANDING 15 9.5 35.5 593 28 STANDING 20 2.0 10.5 74 28 STANDING 25 2.7 16.5 49 31 MORTALITY 5 0.7 0.0 321 31 MORTALITY 10 0.4 0.0 74 31 STANDING 5 1.8 0.0 716 31 STANDING 10 9.9 0.0 1235 31 STANDING 15 12.6 53.7 741 31 STANDING 20 3.7 22.0 123 31 STANDING 30 3.1 23.8 49 34 MORTALITY 5 0.3 0.0 123 34 MORTALITY 10 0.3 0.0 49 34 STANDING 5 1.5 0.0 568 34 STANDING 10 9.3 0.0 1111 34 STANDING 15 10.4 45.4 617 34 STANDING 20 8.0 46.7 296 34 STANDING 25 2.1 14.6 49

56

34 STANDING 30 3.6 29.7 49 37 MORTALITY 5 1.0 0.0 420 37 MORTALITY 10 0.5 0.0 99 37 STANDING 5 0.4 0.0 148 37 STANDING 10 6.8 0.0 790 37 STANDING 15 12.0 48.2 716 37 STANDING 20 12.1 63.8 395 37 STANDING 25 3.6 21.1 74 37 STANDING 30 2.0 12.4 25 37 STANDING 35 2.2 13.8 25 40 MORTALITY 5 0.3 0.0 99 40 MORTALITY 10 0.9 0.0 99 40 MORTALITY 15 0.3 1.4 25 40 MORTALITY 20 0.9 6.5 25 40 STANDING 5 0.2 0.0 49 40 STANDING 10 5.3 0.0 617 40 STANDING 15 12.5 65.6 716 40 STANDING 20 11.9 84.4 370 40 STANDING 25 4.6 35.1 99 40 STANDING 30 1.6 13.1 25 40 STANDING 35 4.8 40.2 49 43 MORTALITY 5 0.2 0.0 49 43 MORTALITY 10 2.4 0.0 296 43 STANDING 10 2.7 0.0 296 43 STANDING 15 10.6 58.6 617 43 STANDING 20 13.2 95.5 420 43 STANDING 25 8.0 61.2 173 43 STANDING 30 1.9 15.6 25 43 STANDING 35 2.5 22.3 25 43 STANDING 40 2.8 25.3 25 49 MORTALITY 10 1.5 0.0 173 49 MORTALITY 15 0.3 1.3 25 49 STANDING 10 1.1 0.0 123 49 STANDING 15 9.1 54.1 519 49 STANDING 20 10.3 78.2 346 49 STANDING 25 12.8 105.0 272 49 STANDING 30 3.2 26.5 49 49 STANDING 35 2.3 21.5 25 49 STANDING 40 6.4 61.5 49 56 MORTALITY 10 1.1 0.0 123 56 MORTALITY 15 1.7 9.6 99 56 MORTALITY 20 0.7 5.1 25 56 MORTALITY 30 1.5 13.3 25 56 STANDING 15 6.0 35.3 346 56 STANDING 20 9.4 72.0 321 56 STANDING 25 12.3 106.7 247 56 STANDING 30 6.3 56.9 99 56 STANDING 35 2.0 17.2 25 56 STANDING 40 3.0 30.8 25 56 STANDING 45 7.7 78.3 49 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm.

57

6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1972) PLOT 46 TREAT T2F3 UREA ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 2.9 0.0 1160 25 PRE-THIN 10 16.5 0.0 2222 25 PRE-THIN 15 5.2 15.6 346 25 STANDING 5 0.2 0.0 49 25 STANDING 10 6.0 0.0 741 25 STANDING 15 1.6 4.9 99 25 THINNINGS 5 2.7 0.0 1111 25 THINNINGS 10 10.5 0.0 1481 25 THINNINGS 15 3.6 10.7 247 28 STANDING 10 2.4 0.0 247 28 STANDING 15 9.7 35.8 568 28 STANDING 20 2.0 9.8 74 31 STANDING 10 1.0 0.0 99 31 STANDING 15 7.4 30.1 395 31 STANDING 20 10.8 54.5 370 31 STANDING 25 1.1 6.2 25 34 STANDING 10 0.2 0.0 25 34 STANDING 15 5.1 22.5 272 34 STANDING 20 13.1 71.7 420 34 STANDING 25 7.7 46.4 173 37 MORTALITY 10 0.2 0.0 25 37 STANDING 15 2.9 13.7 148 37 STANDING 20 11.5 67.3 370 37 STANDING 25 15.1 97.1 321 37 STANDING 30 1.6 10.9 25 40 STANDING 15 1.9 9.9 99 40 STANDING 20 9.3 59.5 296 40 STANDING 25 18.0 124.8 370 40 STANDING 30 6.4 46.0 99 43 STANDING 15 1.4 7.5 74 43 STANDING 20 8.9 59.6 272 43 STANDING 25 15.8 115.2 321 43 STANDING 30 13.2 99.9 198 49 STANDING 15 1.5 9.6 74 49 STANDING 20 4.8 37.7 148 49 STANDING 25 15.9 139.4 321 49 STANDING 30 21.4 198.5 296 49 STANDING 35 2.1 23.2 25 56 MORTALITY 15 0.4 2.4 25 56 MORTALITY 25 1.0 9.1 25 56 STANDING 15 0.6 4.5 25

58

56 STANDING 20 4.9 41.2 148 56 STANDING 25 8.6 79.7 173 56 STANDING 30 19.0 186.2 272 56 STANDING 35 18.0 181.7 198 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 47 TREAT T2F6 UREA ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 4.3 0.0 1975 25 PRE-THIN 10 16.2 0.0 2222 25 PRE-THIN 15 6.3 20.0 420 25 PRE-THIN 20 0.8 4.2 25 25 STANDING 5 0.3 0.0 74 25 STANDING 10 4.4 0.0 519 25 STANDING 15 3.7 11.0 247 25 THINNINGS 5 4.0 0.0 1901 25 THINNINGS 10 11.8 0.0 1704 25 THINNINGS 15 2.7 9.0 173 25 THINNINGS 20 0.8 4.2 25 28 STANDING 10 2.1 0.0 222 28 STANDING 15 8.6 31.9 494 28 STANDING 20 3.6 17.8 123 31 STANDING 10 0.3 0.0 25 31 STANDING 15 7.6 30.1 420 31 STANDING 20 9.5 49.9 321 31 STANDING 25 3.4 19.7 74 34 STANDING 15 4.3 19.3 222 34 STANDING 20 12.3 71.4 395 34 STANDING 25 7.6 47.3 173 34 STANDING 30 3.1 21.4 49 37 STANDING 15 2.5 11.7 123 37 STANDING 20 12.4 71.7 395 37 STANDING 25 11.8 76.3 247 37 STANDING 30 5.3 37.0 74 40 STANDING 15 2.1 11.9 99 40 STANDING 20 10.2 68.3 321 40 STANDING 25 16.1 120.4 321 40 STANDING 30 3.3 26.2 49 40 STANDING 35 4.3 34.6 49

59

43 STANDING 15 1.7 10.3 74 43 STANDING 20 9.6 67.1 296 43 STANDING 25 10.8 84.4 222 43 STANDING 30 12.7 103.1 198 43 STANDING 35 4.8 40.6 49 49 STANDING 20 7.4 54.2 247 49 STANDING 25 14.2 120.1 296 49 STANDING 30 15.4 139.4 222 49 STANDING 35 5.0 47.7 49 49 STANDING 40 2.9 26.9 25 56 MORTALITY 20 0.7 4.9 25 56 STANDING 20 5.4 41.4 173 56 STANDING 25 12.1 106.4 247 56 STANDING 30 16.2 154.7 222 56 STANDING 35 8.4 83.2 99 56 STANDING 40 9.3 95.7 74 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 48 TREAT T2F2 AN ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 5.6 0.0 2568 25 PRE-THIN 10 15.3 0.0 2099 25 PRE-THIN 15 2.4 8.3 148 25 PRE-THIN 25 1.4 7.0 25 25 STANDING 5 0.5 0.0 123 25 STANDING 10 6.0 0.0 741 25 STANDING 15 2.0 6.9 123 25 THINNINGS 5 5.1 0.0 2444 25 THINNINGS 10 9.3 0.0 1358 25 THINNINGS 15 0.4 1.4 25 25 THINNINGS 25 1.4 7.0 25 28 STANDING 10 2.2 0.0 247 28 STANDING 15 10.7 38.5 642 28 STANDING 20 2.9 14.0 99 31 STANDING 10 0.8 0.0 74

60

31 STANDING 15 8.2 31.8 469 31 STANDING 20 11.1 54.7 395 31 STANDING 25 2.1 11.6 49 34 STANDING 15 5.3 23.2 296 34 STANDING 20 16.1 88.3 543 34 STANDING 25 6.9 42.8 148 37 STANDING 15 4.8 22.0 247 37 STANDING 20 18.2 104.1 543 37 STANDING 25 7.1 43.4 148 37 STANDING 30 3.1 19.8 49 40 STANDING 15 4.1 23.0 198 40 STANDING 20 11.3 74.7 346 40 STANDING 25 17.1 119.9 370 40 STANDING 30 5.0 37.5 74 43 STANDING 15 2.6 15.5 123 43 STANDING 20 10.3 71.3 321 43 STANDING 25 18.4 136.5 395 43 STANDING 30 8.0 63.1 123 43 STANDING 35 2.1 16.5 25 49 STANDING 15 2.2 14.4 99 49 STANDING 20 8.3 60.3 247 49 STANDING 25 22.4 179.5 444 49 STANDING 30 10.3 86.2 148 49 STANDING 35 4.7 39.8 49 56 MORTALITY 20 1.5 11.6 49 56 STANDING 20 5.0 38.8 173 56 STANDING 25 13.1 111.9 272 56 STANDING 30 24.7 228.2 370 56 STANDING 35 9.2 87.7 99 56 STANDING 40 3.1 29.1 25 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 49 TREAT T1F4 UREA ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 3.6 0.0 1506

61

25 PRE-THIN 10 14.1 0.0 1852 25 PRE-THIN 15 6.8 20.9 469 25 PRE-THIN 20 2.4 12.2 74 25 STANDING 5 0.8 0.0 247 25 STANDING 10 10.4 0.0 1333 25 STANDING 15 4.7 14.8 321 25 THINNINGS 5 2.8 0.0 1259 25 THINNINGS 10 3.6 0.0 519 25 THINNINGS 15 2.1 6.1 148 25 THINNINGS 20 2.4 12.2 74 28 MORTALITY 10 0.2 0.0 25 28 STANDING 5 0.2 0.0 74 28 STANDING 10 6.9 0.0 815 28 STANDING 15 14.8 58.7 889 28 STANDING 20 2.6 13.5 99 31 MORTALITY 10 0.6 0.0 74 31 MORTALITY 15 0.3 0.9 25 31 STANDING 5 0.2 0.0 74 31 STANDING 10 4.9 0.0 519 31 STANDING 15 15.3 66.4 815 31 STANDING 20 10.8 60.7 370 34 MORTALITY 5 0.1 0.0 49 34 STANDING 5 0.1 0.0 25 34 STANDING 10 2.4 0.0 272 34 STANDING 15 12.1 57.5 691 34 STANDING 20 17.7 105.7 593 34 STANDING 25 6.4 42.8 148 37 MORTALITY 5 0.1 0.0 25 37 MORTALITY 10 0.1 0.0 25 37 STANDING 10 2.1 0.0 222 37 STANDING 15 7.6 34.2 469 37 STANDING 20 22.6 137.9 741 37 STANDING 25 11.4 75.7 247 40 MORTALITY 10 0.2 0.0 25 40 STANDING 10 1.6 0.0 173 40 STANDING 15 8.4 42.9 494 40 STANDING 20 19.7 129.7 617 40 STANDING 25 16.4 117.3 346 40 STANDING 30 1.5 10.7 25 43 MORTALITY 10 0.2 0.0 25 43 STANDING 10 1.1 0.0 123 43 STANDING 15 8.5 46.2 494 43 STANDING 20 19.6 144.0 593 43 STANDING 25 18.2 143.6 370 43 STANDING 30 3.2 25.9 49 49 MORTALITY 10 0.2 0.0 25 49 STANDING 10 0.7 0.0 74 49 STANDING 15 7.5 41.3 444 49 STANDING 20 12.5 95.9 395 49 STANDING 25 24.0 200.3 519 49 STANDING 30 11.6 101.5 173 56 MORTALITY 10 0.3 0.0 25 56 MORTALITY 15 1.7 7.5 123 56 MORTALITY 20 0.9 7.3 25 56 MORTALITY 25 1.1 9.4 25 56 STANDING 10 0.4 0.0 49 56 STANDING 15 6.0 38.1 321 56 STANDING 20 9.9 81.4 296 56 STANDING 25 21.7 193.5 444 56 STANDING 30 17.7 166.9 247

62

56 STANDING 35 4.3 40.8 49 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 50 TREAT T0F4 UREA ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 2.5 0.0 988 25 PRE-THIN 10 10.6 0.0 1333 25 PRE-THIN 15 10.6 34.1 716 25 PRE-THIN 20 1.2 5.8 49 25 STANDING 5 2.5 0.0 988 25 STANDING 10 10.6 0.0 1333 25 STANDING 15 10.6 34.1 716 25 STANDING 20 1.2 5.8 49 28 MORTALITY 5 0.1 0.0 49 28 MORTALITY 10 0.2 0.0 25 28 STANDING 5 1.7 0.0 691 28 STANDING 10 9.8 0.0 1185 28 STANDING 15 17.2 74.3 988 28 STANDING 20 4.2 22.4 148 31 MORTALITY 5 1.1 0.0 519 31 MORTALITY 10 1.5 0.0 198 31 MORTALITY 15 0.4 1.5 25 31 STANDING 5 0.6 0.0 173 31 STANDING 10 6.2 0.0 741 31 STANDING 15 18.4 87.6 988 31 STANDING 20 9.2 51.9 321 31 STANDING 25 2.1 12.9 49 34 MORTALITY 5 0.4 0.0 123 34 MORTALITY 10 0.7 0.0 123 34 STANDING 5 0.1 0.0 49 34 STANDING 10 4.4 0.0 494 34 STANDING 15 11.2 55.8 642 34 STANDING 20 23.6 148.8 790 34 STANDING 25 2.5 17.6 49 37 MORTALITY 5 0.1 0.0 49

63

37 MORTALITY 10 0.1 0.0 25 37 STANDING 10 3.5 0.0 395 37 STANDING 15 9.7 46.0 568 37 STANDING 20 25.2 162.2 815 37 STANDING 25 7.9 55.0 173 40 MORTALITY 10 1.3 0.0 173 40 STANDING 10 1.4 0.0 148 40 STANDING 15 10.6 54.5 617 40 STANDING 20 22.0 156.5 691 40 STANDING 25 11.9 90.8 272 40 STANDING 30 3.0 24.2 49 43 MORTALITY 10 0.9 0.0 99 43 MORTALITY 15 0.3 1.2 25 43 STANDING 10 0.4 0.0 49 43 STANDING 15 9.5 53.4 543 43 STANDING 20 20.6 152.4 642 43 STANDING 25 16.7 134.1 370 43 STANDING 30 3.2 27.2 49 49 MORTALITY 15 0.4 1.8 25 49 STANDING 10 0.4 0.0 49 49 STANDING 15 7.8 45.8 444 49 STANDING 20 17.5 136.4 543 49 STANDING 25 26.3 225.6 543 49 STANDING 30 3.5 32.1 49 56 MORTALITY 10 0.4 0.0 49 56 MORTALITY 15 1.8 9.7 123 56 MORTALITY 20 0.7 5.8 25 56 STANDING 15 6.2 41.0 321 56 STANDING 20 11.3 93.6 346 56 STANDING 25 25.4 233.2 519 56 STANDING 30 14.9 144.1 222 56 STANDING 35 2.1 20.5 25 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 51 TREAT T2F4 UREA ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha)

64

----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 2.0 0.0 667 25 PRE-THIN 10 11.0 0.0 1407 25 PRE-THIN 15 8.5 29.2 543 25 PRE-THIN 20 0.7 3.2 25 25 STANDING 5 0.1 0.0 25 25 STANDING 10 4.7 0.0 519 25 STANDING 15 3.7 11.3 272 25 THINNINGS 5 1.9 0.0 642 25 THINNINGS 10 6.3 0.0 889 25 THINNINGS 15 4.8 18.0 272 25 THINNINGS 20 0.7 3.2 25 28 MORTALITY 10 0.2 0.0 25 28 STANDING 10 1.1 0.0 123 28 STANDING 15 10.1 41.5 543 28 STANDING 20 3.2 15.6 123 31 STANDING 10 0.8 0.0 74 31 STANDING 15 4.4 19.5 222 31 STANDING 20 14.3 76.5 469 31 STANDING 25 1.0 5.4 25 34 STANDING 10 0.2 0.0 25 34 STANDING 15 1.5 6.4 99 34 STANDING 20 13.7 83.1 420 34 STANDING 25 11.2 70.0 247 37 MORTALITY 10 0.2 0.0 25 37 STANDING 15 1.7 7.6 99 37 STANDING 20 8.5 51.6 247 37 STANDING 25 17.8 116.3 370 37 STANDING 30 3.1 21.2 49 40 STANDING 15 1.9 10.0 99 40 STANDING 20 3.4 23.9 99 40 STANDING 25 23.1 179.1 469 40 STANDING 30 6.7 54.7 99 43 STANDING 15 1.3 7.2 74 43 STANDING 20 3.2 23.5 99 43 STANDING 25 18.5 152.3 370 43 STANDING 30 12.8 111.2 198 43 STANDING 35 2.0 18.3 25 49 STANDING 15 1.4 8.7 74 49 STANDING 20 2.5 20.1 74 49 STANDING 25 11.3 98.4 222 49 STANDING 30 23.3 216.5 346 49 STANDING 35 4.5 43.1 49 56 STANDING 15 1.5 9.8 74 56 STANDING 20 0.8 6.4 25 56 STANDING 25 8.6 81.7 173 56 STANDING 30 29.2 299.4 395 56 STANDING 35 6.8 71.3 74 56 STANDING 40 2.9 31.2 25 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter.

65

7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 52 TREAT T2F2 ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 2.6 0.0 1111 25 PRE-THIN 10 10.7 0.0 1383 25 PRE-THIN 15 8.0 27.4 494 25 PRE-THIN 20 1.5 7.2 49 25 STANDING 5 0.2 0.0 49 25 STANDING 10 4.4 0.0 543 25 STANDING 15 3.7 12.4 222 25 THINNINGS 5 2.4 0.0 1062 25 THINNINGS 10 6.3 0.0 840 25 THINNINGS 15 4.3 15.0 272 25 THINNINGS 20 1.5 7.2 49 28 STANDING 10 1.6 0.0 173 28 STANDING 15 8.3 32.3 469 28 STANDING 20 5.3 27.5 173 31 STANDING 10 0.5 0.0 49 31 STANDING 15 6.9 30.5 370 31 STANDING 20 10.3 55.6 321 31 STANDING 25 3.5 21.8 74 34 STANDING 10 0.5 0.0 49 34 STANDING 15 2.9 14.4 148 34 STANDING 20 9.8 57.6 321 34 STANDING 25 12.8 83.0 272 34 STANDING 30 1.7 12.1 25 37 MORTALITY 10 0.2 0.0 25 37 STANDING 15 2.4 11.4 123 37 STANDING 20 8.8 52.5 272 37 STANDING 25 14.7 97.3 296 37 STANDING 30 6.8 47.5 99 40 STANDING 15 2.0 11.9 99 40 STANDING 20 8.3 60.0 247 40 STANDING 25 12.6 96.6 247 40 STANDING 30 11.6 92.5 173 40 STANDING 35 2.2 17.9 25 43 STANDING 15 0.9 5.2 49 43 STANDING 20 7.2 53.5 222 43 STANDING 25 10.7 85.2 222 43 STANDING 30 16.7 141.8 247 43 STANDING 35 4.6 40.2 49 49 STANDING 15 0.3 1.5 25 49 STANDING 20 5.7 46.2 173 49 STANDING 25 10.7 94.2 222 49 STANDING 30 19.3 176.9 272

66

49 STANDING 35 6.9 66.5 74 49 STANDING 40 2.7 26.3 25 56 MORTALITY 15 0.3 1.7 25 56 MORTALITY 25 1.1 10.0 25 56 MORTALITY 30 1.9 18.9 25 56 STANDING 20 4.3 39.2 123 56 STANDING 25 9.9 95.1 198 56 STANDING 30 15.0 152.7 198 56 STANDING 35 11.5 120.6 123 56 STANDING 40 8.9 94.5 74 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 53 TREAT T0F4 UREA ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 4.5 0.0 1951 25 PRE-THIN 10 10.8 0.0 1556 25 PRE-THIN 15 8.1 23.9 543 25 STANDING 5 4.5 0.0 1951 25 STANDING 10 10.8 0.0 1556 25 STANDING 15 8.1 23.9 543 28 MORTALITY 5 0.2 0.0 123 28 MORTALITY 10 0.4 0.0 74 28 STANDING 5 3.4 0.0 1383 28 STANDING 10 12.4 0.0 1605 28 STANDING 15 13.6 52.2 765 28 STANDING 20 2.5 11.5 99 31 MORTALITY 5 1.4 0.0 716 31 MORTALITY 10 1.7 0.0 247 31 STANDING 5 1.5 0.0 543 31 STANDING 10 9.1 0.0 1160 31 STANDING 15 14.5 62.7 815 31 STANDING 20 10.6 55.3 370 34 MORTALITY 5 0.9 0.0 370 34 MORTALITY 10 0.3 0.0 49 34 STANDING 5 0.6 0.0 173

67

34 STANDING 10 7.0 0.0 889 34 STANDING 15 12.1 52.5 716 34 STANDING 20 17.8 104.7 593 34 STANDING 25 4.2 26.1 99 37 MORTALITY 5 0.3 0.0 99 37 MORTALITY 10 0.3 0.0 49 37 STANDING 5 0.3 0.0 74 37 STANDING 10 5.6 0.0 716 37 STANDING 15 12.8 58.2 741 37 STANDING 20 18.1 107.9 568 37 STANDING 25 9.8 62.6 222 40 MORTALITY 5 0.3 0.0 74 40 MORTALITY 10 1.4 0.0 247 40 STANDING 10 3.2 0.0 370 40 STANDING 15 12.0 58.6 716 40 STANDING 20 15.8 105.7 519 40 STANDING 25 18.1 132.3 395 43 MORTALITY 10 0.8 0.0 123 43 MORTALITY 15 0.6 1.4 49 43 STANDING 10 2.4 0.0 247 43 STANDING 15 10.7 59.5 617 43 STANDING 20 16.1 114.7 519 43 STANDING 25 17.2 131.7 370 43 STANDING 30 4.5 35.7 74 49 MORTALITY 10 0.9 0.0 99 49 MORTALITY 15 0.3 1.4 25 49 STANDING 10 1.3 0.0 123 49 STANDING 15 8.4 48.3 494 49 STANDING 20 15.9 120.1 519 49 STANDING 25 21.7 179.7 444 49 STANDING 30 8.2 71.0 123 56 MORTALITY 10 0.5 0.0 49 56 MORTALITY 15 0.4 2.1 25 56 MORTALITY 20 0.8 6.8 25 56 MORTALITY 25 1.1 9.3 25 56 STANDING 10 0.5 0.0 49 56 STANDING 15 8.1 49.5 469 56 STANDING 20 13.3 108.4 420 56 STANDING 25 14.4 128.2 296 56 STANDING 30 19.9 185.6 296 56 STANDING 35 4.3 40.9 49 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008.

68

THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 54 TREAT T2F4 UREA ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 3.9 0.0 1728 25 PRE-THIN 10 16.5 0.0 2148 25 PRE-THIN 15 3.9 11.1 272 25 PRE-THIN 20 0.6 2.8 25 25 STANDING 10 6.6 0.0 716 25 STANDING 15 2.0 6.0 148 25 THINNINGS 5 3.9 0.0 1728 25 THINNINGS 10 9.9 0.0 1432 25 THINNINGS 15 1.8 5.1 123 25 THINNINGS 20 0.6 2.8 25 28 STANDING 10 0.8 0.0 74 28 STANDING 15 12.4 46.8 691 28 STANDING 20 2.6 12.2 99 31 STANDING 15 6.9 29.1 346 31 STANDING 20 14.6 75.1 494 31 STANDING 25 1.0 5.4 25 34 STANDING 15 2.2 10.9 99 34 STANDING 20 16.3 91.7 519 34 STANDING 25 11.0 69.1 247 37 STANDING 15 0.6 2.8 25 37 STANDING 20 13.9 79.9 420 37 STANDING 25 19.0 120.6 395 37 STANDING 30 1.5 10.2 25 40 STANDING 20 8.9 59.4 272 40 STANDING 25 22.5 163.8 469 40 STANDING 30 8.0 61.0 123 43 STANDING 20 7.7 54.4 222 43 STANDING 25 20.7 160.1 420 43 STANDING 30 14.8 121.6 222 49 STANDING 20 4.4 32.2 123 49 STANDING 25 18.4 149.8 370 49 STANDING 30 22.1 193.8 321 49 STANDING 35 4.2 38.4 49 56 STANDING 20 2.8 21.9 74 56 STANDING 25 12.3 105.3 247 56 STANDING 30 24.1 222.9 346 56 STANDING 35 17.9 173.1 198 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment.

69

9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 55 TREAT T2F2 AN ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 1.7 0.0 741 25 PRE-THIN 10 10.5 0.0 1333 25 PRE-THIN 15 8.6 29.5 543 25 PRE-THIN 20 0.6 3.0 25 25 STANDING 5 0.1 0.0 25 25 STANDING 10 5.0 0.0 568 25 STANDING 15 3.9 13.3 247 25 THINNINGS 5 1.6 0.0 716 25 THINNINGS 10 5.5 0.0 765 25 THINNINGS 15 4.7 16.2 296 25 THINNINGS 20 0.6 3.0 25 28 MORTALITY 10 0.5 0.0 74 28 STANDING 10 0.9 0.0 99 28 STANDING 15 9.2 38.3 494 28 STANDING 20 5.0 25.8 173 31 MORTALITY 10 0.2 0.0 25 31 STANDING 15 4.6 20.1 247 31 STANDING 20 13.9 76.3 444 31 STANDING 25 2.1 13.0 49 34 STANDING 15 1.9 9.1 99 34 STANDING 20 11.0 65.5 346 34 STANDING 25 13.9 91.2 296 37 STANDING 15 1.6 8.1 74 37 STANDING 20 9.1 55.4 272 37 STANDING 25 17.5 116.1 346 37 STANDING 30 3.2 21.6 49 40 STANDING 15 0.5 2.8 25 40 STANDING 20 7.1 48.1 222 40 STANDING 25 16.0 120.3 321 40 STANDING 30 11.2 87.7 173 43 STANDING 15 0.5 3.0 25 43 STANDING 20 5.6 39.7 173 43 STANDING 25 13.4 104.4 272 43 STANDING 30 18.3 152.0 272 49 STANDING 15 0.5 3.4 25 49 STANDING 20 4.1 32.1 123 49 STANDING 25 11.0 92.0 222 49 STANDING 30 18.7 169.7 272 49 STANDING 35 8.3 78.0 99 56 STANDING 15 0.5 3.7 25 56 STANDING 20 2.5 20.5 74 56 STANDING 25 8.3 74.6 173 56 STANDING 30 19.7 191.3 272 56 STANDING 35 18.2 185.5 198

70

----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 57 TREAT T2F2 ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 2.1 0.0 765 25 PRE-THIN 10 9.3 0.0 1111 25 PRE-THIN 15 8.9 30.6 543 25 PRE-THIN 20 0.6 2.6 25 25 STANDING 5 0.1 0.0 25 25 STANDING 10 4.7 0.0 494 25 STANDING 15 3.4 10.4 222 25 THINNINGS 5 2.0 0.0 741 25 THINNINGS 10 4.6 0.0 617 25 THINNINGS 15 5.5 20.3 321 25 THINNINGS 20 0.6 2.6 25 28 STANDING 10 0.4 0.0 49 28 STANDING 15 10.1 41.3 568 28 STANDING 20 3.3 16.6 123 31 STANDING 10 0.2 0.0 25 31 STANDING 15 5.4 25.2 272 31 STANDING 20 11.8 62.6 420 31 STANDING 25 1.0 5.8 25 34 STANDING 10 0.3 0.0 25 34 STANDING 15 3.3 18.2 148 34 STANDING 20 15.0 90.3 469 34 STANDING 25 4.4 29.2 99 37 STANDING 15 0.8 3.5 49 37 STANDING 20 16.7 102.7 494 37 STANDING 25 7.9 51.5 173 37 STANDING 30 1.5 9.9 25 40 STANDING 15 0.9 4.4 49 40 STANDING 20 9.1 63.0 272 40 STANDING 25 18.3 135.9 395 40 STANDING 30 1.6 12.6 25 43 STANDING 15 0.9 5.1 49

71

43 STANDING 20 7.8 57.2 222 43 STANDING 25 22.1 173.2 444 43 STANDING 30 1.7 14.4 25 49 STANDING 15 0.3 1.7 25 49 STANDING 20 5.3 41.0 148 49 STANDING 25 21.6 180.4 420 49 STANDING 30 9.9 86.5 148 56 STANDING 15 0.4 1.9 25 56 STANDING 20 0.7 5.5 25 56 STANDING 25 14.4 128.3 296 56 STANDING 30 25.5 239.4 370 56 STANDING 35 2.4 25.2 25 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 58 TREAT T2F6 UREA ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 4.8 0.0 2049 25 PRE-THIN 10 14.6 0.0 1778 25 PRE-THIN 15 5.8 20.9 346 25 STANDING 5 0.1 0.0 25 25 STANDING 10 5.8 0.0 642 25 STANDING 15 2.8 10.2 173 25 THINNINGS 5 4.7 0.0 2025 25 THINNINGS 10 8.8 0.0 1136 25 THINNINGS 15 2.9 10.7 173 28 MORTALITY 10 0.2 0.0 25 28 STANDING 10 1.3 0.0 123 28 STANDING 15 10.2 39.8 568 28 STANDING 20 3.4 16.8 123 31 STANDING 15 5.2 21.6 272 31 STANDING 20 14.8 76.2 494 31 STANDING 25 2.1 11.9 49 34 STANDING 15 2.0 10.2 99 34 STANDING 20 13.6 78.2 420 34 STANDING 25 13.4 84.7 296

72

37 MORTALITY 15 0.5 2.7 25 37 STANDING 15 0.5 2.7 25 37 STANDING 20 9.0 52.4 272 37 STANDING 25 21.3 134.6 444 37 STANDING 30 3.2 21.3 49 40 STANDING 20 6.6 45.1 198 40 STANDING 25 23.5 171.0 469 40 STANDING 30 8.4 63.1 123 43 STANDING 20 3.2 23.5 99 43 STANDING 25 20.7 159.8 420 43 STANDING 30 16.6 131.6 247 43 STANDING 35 2.0 16.3 25 49 STANDING 20 2.6 20.4 74 49 STANDING 25 15.3 130.2 296 49 STANDING 30 22.1 193.0 321 49 STANDING 35 8.8 77.7 99 56 STANDING 20 1.9 16.6 49 56 STANDING 25 6.3 56.5 123 56 STANDING 30 25.6 239.0 370 56 STANDING 35 20.6 198.3 222 56 STANDING 40 2.8 27.8 25 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 59 TREAT T1F4 UREA ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 4.2 0.0 1877 25 PRE-THIN 10 18.5 0.0 2444 25 PRE-THIN 15 4.4 13.3 296 25 STANDING 5 0.7 0.0 222 25 STANDING 10 11.4 0.0 1457 25 STANDING 15 3.9 11.6 272 25 THINNINGS 5 3.4 0.0 1654 25 THINNINGS 10 7.1 0.0 988 25 THINNINGS 15 0.5 1.7 25 28 MORTALITY 10 0.2 0.0 25

73

28 STANDING 5 0.2 0.0 49 28 STANDING 10 7.9 0.0 914 28 STANDING 15 15.1 55.0 914 28 STANDING 20 1.3 6.5 49 31 STANDING 5 0.1 0.0 25 31 STANDING 10 4.4 0.0 519 31 STANDING 15 17.3 67.2 1012 31 STANDING 20 10.3 51.9 370 34 MORTALITY 5 0.1 0.0 25 34 MORTALITY 10 0.1 0.0 25 34 STANDING 10 3.0 0.0 346 34 STANDING 15 16.0 72.4 889 34 STANDING 20 18.0 100.9 593 34 STANDING 25 2.2 14.2 49 37 STANDING 10 2.3 0.0 272 37 STANDING 15 14.3 66.3 765 37 STANDING 20 19.8 112.6 642 37 STANDING 25 8.7 52.9 198 40 MORTALITY 10 0.5 0.0 74 40 MORTALITY 15 0.3 1.2 25 40 STANDING 10 1.6 0.0 173 40 STANDING 15 10.5 53.9 568 40 STANDING 20 21.5 138.6 716 40 STANDING 25 13.3 93.4 296 40 STANDING 30 1.6 12.2 25 43 MORTALITY 10 0.4 0.0 49 43 STANDING 10 1.2 0.0 123 43 STANDING 15 9.3 51.6 494 43 STANDING 20 20.9 142.8 691 43 STANDING 25 18.6 140.3 395 43 STANDING 30 1.8 14.0 25 49 MORTALITY 10 0.3 0.0 25 49 STANDING 10 0.9 0.0 99 49 STANDING 15 7.5 43.5 395 49 STANDING 20 20.7 149.2 667 49 STANDING 25 24.5 197.4 494 49 STANDING 30 3.6 30.9 49 56 MORTALITY 10 0.7 0.0 74 56 MORTALITY 15 0.4 1.7 25 56 MORTALITY 20 0.7 4.7 25 56 STANDING 10 0.3 0.0 25 56 STANDING 15 4.6 27.4 247 56 STANDING 20 20.1 151.9 642 56 STANDING 25 19.4 164.0 395 56 STANDING 30 16.2 141.3 247 56 STANDING 35 2.4 22.3 25 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008.

74

THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 60 TREAT T2F2 ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 25 PRE-THIN 5 3.3 0.0 1432 25 PRE-THIN 10 14.9 0.0 1852 25 PRE-THIN 15 5.5 15.0 395 25 STANDING 10 6.2 0.0 691 25 STANDING 15 2.0 5.7 148 25 THINNINGS 5 3.3 0.0 1432 25 THINNINGS 10 8.8 0.0 1160 25 THINNINGS 15 3.5 9.3 247 28 STANDING 10 0.8 0.0 74 28 STANDING 15 13.1 48.9 716 28 STANDING 20 1.3 5.7 49 31 STANDING 15 6.7 27.9 346 31 STANDING 20 14.0 67.1 494 34 STANDING 15 2.5 11.4 123 34 STANDING 20 18.4 100.5 593 34 STANDING 25 5.1 29.7 123 37 STANDING 15 1.6 7.9 74 37 STANDING 20 14.5 80.1 444 37 STANDING 25 14.4 84.4 321 40 STANDING 15 0.5 3.2 25 40 STANDING 20 13.5 86.7 395 40 STANDING 25 18.8 126.3 395 40 STANDING 30 1.6 10.9 25 43 STANDING 20 10.1 72.5 296 43 STANDING 25 24.0 174.7 494 43 STANDING 30 3.2 23.6 49 49 STANDING 20 3.0 20.5 99 49 STANDING 25 24.9 188.7 519 49 STANDING 30 12.5 98.9 198 49 STANDING 35 2.1 17.1 25 56 STANDING 20 2.5 19.1 74 56 STANDING 25 22.1 183.6 420 56 STANDING 30 22.8 195.0 321 56 STANDING 35 2.5 24.0 25 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter.

75

7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. 8.3 250 CROP TREES GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 47 TREATMENT T2F6 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 18.5 10.7 3.6 12.1 247 13.6 29 3 STANDING 33.4 27.0 5.9 13.7 247 17.4 32 6 STANDING 52.0 45.4 8.4 15.5 247 20.8 35 9 STANDING 76.0 68.6 10.9 17.8 247 23.7 38 12 STANDING 92.1 84.4 12.8 18.6 247 25.7 41 15 STANDING 119.8 110.7 14.4 21.8 247 27.3 44 18 STANDING 138.7 129.0 15.9 23.1 247 28.6 49 24 STANDING 174.8 163.8 18.1 25.7 247 30.6 56 32 STANDING 217.9 205.7 21.0 27.8 247 32.9 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 48 TREATMENT T2F2 AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH

76

(yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 16.9 6.9 3.4 11.6 247 13.3 29 3 STANDING 33.5 27.1 6.0 13.8 247 17.5 32 6 STANDING 49.4 42.9 8.2 15.3 247 20.5 35 9 STANDING 69.6 62.5 10.3 17.4 247 23.1 38 12 STANDING 81.6 74.4 12.1 17.6 247 25.0 41 15 STANDING 107.7 99.3 13.7 20.7 247 26.6 44 18 STANDING 125.9 116.8 15.1 22.1 247 27.9 49 24 STANDING 156.3 146.3 17.4 24.1 247 30.0 56 32 STANDING 207.4 195.8 20.9 27.0 247 32.8 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 49 TREATMENT T1F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 20.3 13.0 3.8 12.8 247 13.9 29 3 STANDING 35.0 27.8 5.7 15.1 247 17.1 32 6 STANDING 49.8 42.6 7.5 16.6 247 19.7 35 9 STANDING 69.5 61.8 9.5 18.7 247 22.1 38 12 STANDING 79.5 71.8 10.9 18.9 247 23.7 41 15 STANDING 92.2 84.1 12.1 19.7 247 24.9 44 18 STANDING 113.0 103.6 12.9 22.9 247 25.8 49 24 STANDING 137.0 126.8 14.7 24.8 247 27.5 56 32 STANDING 173.1 161.8 17.2 27.0 247 29.7 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter.

77

7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 50 TREATMENT T0F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 26.8 20.0 4.8 13.4 247 15.8 29 3 STANDING 40.6 33.5 6.4 15.7 247 18.2 32 6 STANDING 53.9 46.6 7.9 17.1 247 20.2 35 9 STANDING 71.2 63.2 9.5 19.2 247 22.1 38 12 STANDING 80.5 72.3 10.5 19.8 247 23.2 41 15 STANDING 96.9 87.8 11.4 22.0 247 24.2 44 18 STANDING 107.4 98.0 12.1 23.1 247 25.0 49 24 STANDING 127.8 117.6 13.5 24.9 247 26.4 56 32 STANDING 155.8 144.7 15.3 27.0 247 28.1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 51 TREATMENT T2F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 17.6 10.5 3.4 12.1 247 13.3 29 3 STANDING 34.2 27.7 6.0 14.2 247 17.5 32 6 STANDING 52.8 46.1 8.4 15.9 247 20.9 35 9 STANDING 76.5 69.1 11.1 18.0 247 23.9

78

38 12 STANDING 95.2 87.5 13.2 19.0 247 26.1 41 15 STANDING 128.8 119.4 14.8 23.0 247 27.6 44 18 STANDING 150.1 139.8 16.1 24.8 247 28.9 49 24 STANDING 184.2 172.8 18.3 27.2 247 30.7 56 32 STANDING 237.2 224.1 21.4 30.3 247 33.2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 52 TREATMENT T2F2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 19.9 11.7 3.8 12.2 247 14.0 29 3 STANDING 40.4 33.7 6.7 14.8 247 18.6 32 6 STANDING 60.4 53.5 9.2 16.6 247 21.8 35 9 STANDING 87.2 79.5 12.0 18.8 247 24.9 38 12 STANDING 105.4 97.4 14.4 19.4 247 27.2 41 15 STANDING 138.9 129.3 16.1 23.0 247 28.8 44 18 STANDING 162.0 151.7 17.7 24.6 247 30.2 49 24 STANDING 201.2 189.6 20.1 27.1 247 32.2 56 32 STANDING 256.9 243.6 23.4 30.1 247 34.7 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008.

79

GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 53 TREATMENT T0F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 19.7 13.4 4.0 11.7 247 14.4 29 3 STANDING 32.0 25.4 5.6 13.9 247 17.1 32 6 STANDING 45.1 38.4 7.3 15.5 247 19.4 35 9 STANDING 62.6 55.3 9.1 17.5 247 21.7 38 12 STANDING 74.2 66.7 10.5 18.2 247 23.3 41 15 STANDING 94.1 85.6 11.7 21.0 247 24.5 44 18 STANDING 106.8 97.7 12.6 22.2 247 25.4 49 24 STANDING 131.8 121.9 14.4 24.2 247 27.2 56 32 STANDING 170.1 158.9 17.0 26.7 247 29.6 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 54 TREATMENT T2F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 15.4 5.1 3.2 11.4 247 12.8 29 3 STANDING 31.2 24.8 5.6 13.6 247 17.0 32 6 STANDING 47.9 41.3 7.9 15.3 247 20.1 35 9 STANDING 70.2 62.9 10.3 17.6 247 23.0 38 12 STANDING 84.4 77.0 12.1 18.2 247 25.0 41 15 STANDING 110.4 101.6 13.6 21.4 247 26.4 44 18 STANDING 128.7 119.2 14.8 23.0 247 27.6 49 24 STANDING 156.2 145.8 16.6 25.0 247 29.3 56 32 STANDING 193.8 182.2 19.1 27.2 247 31.4 ---------------------------------------------------------------------

80

NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 55 TREATMENT T2F2 AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 20.2 13.3 3.9 12.3 247 14.2 29 3 STANDING 40.0 33.4 6.7 14.9 247 18.6 32 6 STANDING 58.5 51.6 9.0 16.5 247 21.5 35 9 STANDING 83.2 75.6 11.5 18.7 247 24.4 38 12 STANDING 97.8 90.0 13.4 19.2 247 26.3 41 15 STANDING 124.3 115.1 14.8 22.2 247 27.6 44 18 STANDING 141.8 132.0 16.0 23.7 247 28.7 49 24 STANDING 175.5 164.5 18.0 26.2 247 30.4 56 32 STANDING 218.1 205.7 20.5 28.8 247 32.5 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 57 TREATMENT T2F2

81

---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 19.0 11.2 3.7 12.3 247 13.8 29 3 STANDING 35.5 28.8 6.0 14.6 247 17.6 32 6 STANDING 50.5 43.6 7.9 16.1 247 20.2 35 9 STANDING 69.6 62.1 9.7 18.3 247 22.4 38 12 STANDING 81.5 73.9 11.3 18.7 247 24.1 41 15 STANDING 103.0 94.2 12.5 21.5 247 25.4 44 18 STANDING 116.9 107.7 13.5 22.7 247 26.4 49 24 STANDING 141.9 131.8 15.3 24.6 247 28.1 56 32 STANDING 183.5 172.0 17.9 27.5 247 30.4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 58 TREATMENT T2F6 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 19.5 10.2 3.7 12.4 247 13.8 29 3 STANDING 35.5 28.9 6.1 14.3 247 17.8 32 6 STANDING 54.2 47.5 8.6 16.0 247 21.1 35 9 STANDING 79.5 72.0 11.3 18.3 247 24.1 38 12 STANDING 93.8 86.3 13.4 18.4 247 26.3 41 15 STANDING 120.2 111.5 15.1 21.1 247 27.9 44 18 STANDING 141.0 131.6 16.7 22.6 247 29.3 49 24 STANDING 178.1 167.4 19.2 25.2 247 31.4 56 32 STANDING 225.9 213.8 22.3 27.8 247 33.9 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm.

82

4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 59 TREATMENT T1F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 17.4 10.8 3.6 11.4 247 13.6 29 3 STANDING 29.7 23.2 5.3 13.6 247 16.6 32 6 STANDING 41.8 35.3 7.0 14.9 247 19.0 35 9 STANDING 57.6 50.5 8.7 16.8 247 21.1 38 12 STANDING 67.0 59.8 10.0 17.3 247 22.7 41 15 STANDING 85.7 77.4 11.0 20.1 247 23.8 44 18 STANDING 98.5 89.6 11.9 21.6 247 24.7 49 24 STANDING 118.2 108.6 13.3 23.3 247 26.2 56 32 STANDING 142.1 131.9 15.2 24.7 247 28.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 60 TREATMENT T2F2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm)

83

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 15.2 5.7 3.1 11.3 247 12.7 29 3 STANDING 29.8 23.6 5.6 13.1 247 17.0 32 6 STANDING 42.5 36.3 7.4 14.4 247 19.6 35 9 STANDING 59.3 52.5 9.3 16.4 247 21.9 38 12 STANDING 70.2 63.3 10.8 16.8 247 23.6 41 15 STANDING 89.4 81.5 12.1 19.3 247 25.0 44 18 STANDING 103.8 95.4 13.1 20.8 247 26.0 49 24 STANDING 125.2 116.0 14.8 22.4 247 27.6 56 32 STANDING 157.7 147.5 17.3 24.4 247 29.9 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. 8.4 500 CROP TREES GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 47 TREATMENT T2F6 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 30.6 10.7 6.0 11.8 494 12.4 29 3 STANDING 56.2 42.7 10.0 13.5 494 16.1 32 6 STANDING 88.3 74.8 14.3 15.2 494 19.2 35 9 STANDING 130.0 115.2 18.8 17.5 494 22.0 38 12 STANDING 156.1 141.1 22.2 18.1 494 23.9 41 15 STANDING 204.8 187.2 25.0 21.3 494 25.4 44 18 STANDING 237.2 218.5 27.5 22.6 494 26.6 49 24 STANDING 298.5 277.5 31.3 25.1 494 28.4 56 32 STANDING 374.0 350.8 36.5 27.3 494 30.7 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987).

84

3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 48 TREATMENT T2F2 AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 27.2 6.9 5.7 11.0 494 12.1 29 3 STANDING 55.9 42.8 10.2 13.2 494 16.2 32 6 STANDING 83.6 70.6 14.2 14.7 494 19.1 35 9 STANDING 119.1 104.9 17.9 16.8 494 21.5 38 12 STANDING 140.6 126.3 21.0 17.2 494 23.3 41 15 STANDING 184.8 168.2 23.8 20.2 494 24.8 44 18 STANDING 215.8 198.1 26.2 21.6 494 26.0 49 24 STANDING 268.0 248.6 30.2 23.5 494 27.9 56 32 STANDING 353.0 330.8 35.9 26.3 494 30.4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 49 TREATMENT T1F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH

85

(yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 35.3 15.6 6.6 12.5 494 13.1 29 3 STANDING 61.2 46.7 10.1 14.7 494 16.1 32 6 STANDING 88.0 73.5 13.4 16.3 494 18.6 35 9 STANDING 122.5 106.9 16.9 18.3 494 20.9 38 12 STANDING 140.8 125.3 19.4 18.5 494 22.4 41 15 STANDING 165.7 149.3 21.4 19.9 494 23.5 44 18 STANDING 199.4 180.9 23.0 22.4 494 24.4 49 24 STANDING 241.3 221.3 26.0 24.3 494 25.9 56 32 STANDING 302.2 280.2 30.2 26.4 494 27.9 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 50 TREATMENT T0F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 45.6 31.4 8.3 13.1 494 14.7 29 3 STANDING 70.0 55.4 11.2 15.3 494 17.0 32 6 STANDING 94.0 79.1 13.9 16.8 494 18.9 35 9 STANDING 125.4 109.4 16.8 18.8 494 20.8 38 12 STANDING 143.9 127.7 18.9 19.4 494 22.1 41 15 STANDING 174.8 156.8 20.6 21.7 494 23.1 44 18 STANDING 195.2 176.4 22.0 22.9 494 23.8 49 24 STANDING 234.3 214.1 24.8 24.6 494 25.3 56 32 STANDING 293.4 271.2 28.7 27.0 494 27.2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter.

86

7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 51 TREATMENT T2F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 31.0 11.3 6.2 11.7 494 12.6 29 3 STANDING 61.1 47.7 10.7 13.9 494 16.6 32 6 STANDING 94.5 80.9 15.2 15.6 494 19.8 35 9 STANDING 138.5 123.7 19.9 17.9 494 22.6 38 12 STANDING 168.7 153.4 23.6 18.6 494 24.7 41 15 STANDING 227.2 208.8 26.5 22.5 494 26.1 44 18 STANDING 263.9 244.1 28.8 24.2 494 27.2 49 24 STANDING 323.6 301.7 32.6 26.4 494 29.0 56 32 STANDING 415.3 390.4 38.0 29.4 494 31.3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 52 TREATMENT T2F2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 30.7 11.7 6.1 11.5 494 12.5 29 3 STANDING 64.4 50.8 11.1 14.0 494 16.9 32 6 STANDING 98.2 84.3 15.4 15.9 494 19.9 35 9 STANDING 143.3 128.0 20.1 18.1 494 22.8

87

38 12 STANDING 173.2 157.8 24.0 18.7 494 24.9 41 15 STANDING 228.5 210.1 26.8 22.3 494 26.3 44 18 STANDING 265.4 245.6 29.4 23.7 494 27.5 49 24 STANDING 330.5 308.3 33.3 26.3 494 29.3 56 32 STANDING 422.5 397.4 38.8 29.3 494 31.6 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 53 TREATMENT T0F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 36.3 23.1 7.4 11.6 494 13.8 29 3 STANDING 58.8 45.5 10.4 13.8 494 16.4 32 6 STANDING 82.7 69.0 13.4 15.3 494 18.6 35 9 STANDING 114.5 99.9 16.7 17.3 494 20.8 38 12 STANDING 135.2 120.3 19.3 18.0 494 22.3 41 15 STANDING 171.3 154.3 21.3 20.7 494 23.5 44 18 STANDING 194.3 176.3 23.0 22.0 494 24.3 49 24 STANDING 236.9 217.4 26.0 23.8 494 25.9 56 32 STANDING 302.5 280.7 30.5 26.2 494 28.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008.

88

GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 54 TREATMENT T2F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 27.9 5.1 5.7 11.3 494 12.2 29 3 STANDING 56.9 43.9 10.4 13.3 494 16.4 32 6 STANDING 89.4 76.3 14.8 15.1 494 19.5 35 9 STANDING 132.5 118.1 19.5 17.4 494 22.4 38 12 STANDING 160.6 145.8 23.1 18.0 494 24.4 41 15 STANDING 210.5 193.2 26.1 21.2 494 25.9 44 18 STANDING 247.1 228.4 28.6 22.8 494 27.2 49 24 STANDING 301.6 281.2 32.5 24.6 494 29.0 56 32 STANDING 379.2 356.4 38.0 26.9 494 31.3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 55 TREATMENT T2F2 AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 33.0 13.3 6.5 11.9 494 12.9 29 3 STANDING 68.4 54.8 11.6 14.4 494 17.3 32 6 STANDING 102.6 88.7 16.0 16.1 494 20.3 35 9 STANDING 148.0 132.9 20.7 18.4 494 23.1 38 12 STANDING 176.3 160.8 24.4 18.9 494 25.1 41 15 STANDING 224.7 206.8 27.1 21.8 494 26.4 44 18 STANDING 258.7 239.6 29.4 23.2 494 27.6 49 24 STANDING 323.3 301.8 33.4 25.8 494 29.4 56 32 STANDING 408.6 384.4 38.9 28.4 494 31.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------

89

NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 57 TREATMENT T2F2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 31.5 9.8 6.1 12.0 494 12.6 29 3 STANDING 59.9 46.0 10.3 14.2 494 16.3 32 6 STANDING 85.7 71.7 13.6 15.7 494 18.7 35 9 STANDING 118.9 103.8 16.9 17.8 494 20.9 38 12 STANDING 141.2 126.0 19.7 18.3 494 22.6 41 15 STANDING 179.0 161.7 22.0 21.1 494 23.8 44 18 STANDING 205.1 186.8 23.9 22.3 494 24.8 49 24 STANDING 249.1 229.4 27.2 24.1 494 26.5 56 32 STANDING 317.2 295.2 31.7 26.6 494 28.6 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 58 TREATMENT T2F6 UREA

90

---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 33.0 10.2 6.4 12.0 494 12.9 29 3 STANDING 61.1 47.9 10.8 13.7 494 16.7 32 6 STANDING 95.7 82.5 15.7 15.4 494 20.1 35 9 STANDING 141.3 126.7 20.5 17.7 494 23.0 38 12 STANDING 170.1 155.3 24.5 18.1 494 25.1 41 15 STANDING 220.2 203.0 27.6 21.0 494 26.7 44 18 STANDING 258.7 240.2 30.6 22.5 494 28.1 49 24 STANDING 326.0 305.2 35.1 25.0 494 30.1 56 32 STANDING 414.5 390.9 41.0 27.5 494 32.5 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 59 TREATMENT T1F4 UREA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 30.4 9.9 6.3 11.3 494 12.8 29 3 STANDING 53.4 40.0 9.7 13.4 494 15.8 32 6 STANDING 76.3 62.9 12.8 14.8 494 18.1 35 9 STANDING 105.5 91.2 15.9 16.6 494 20.3 38 12 STANDING 123.3 109.0 18.4 17.1 494 21.8 41 15 STANDING 157.6 141.1 20.4 19.8 494 22.9 44 18 STANDING 181.7 164.2 22.1 21.2 494 23.8 49 24 STANDING 219.2 200.3 24.8 23.0 494 25.3 56 32 STANDING 266.1 245.9 28.5 24.5 494 27.1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm.

91

4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREE (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 60 TREATMENT T2F2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 0 STANDING 26.9 5.7 5.7 11.0 494 12.1 29 3 STANDING 54.7 42.1 10.3 12.9 494 16.3 32 6 STANDING 79.4 66.8 13.9 14.2 494 19.0 35 9 STANDING 111.2 97.5 17.4 16.2 494 21.2 38 12 STANDING 131.8 118.1 20.4 16.6 494 23.0 41 15 STANDING 169.2 153.5 22.9 19.2 494 24.3 44 18 STANDING 197.7 180.7 24.9 20.8 494 25.4 49 24 STANDING 238.1 219.8 28.2 22.3 494 27.0 56 32 STANDING 303.6 283.3 33.1 24.4 494 29.2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008.

92

9. APPENDIX I: SUB3 STUDY PLOT SUMMARIES 9.1 STAND SUMMARIES THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 63 TREATMENT T2F1 N ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 PRE-THIN 282.0 165.3 43.7 18.5 3432 12.7 40 0 STANDING 127.2 96.4 18.8 18.5 889 16.4 40 0 THINNINGS 154.9 68.9 24.9 18.5 2543 11.2 41 1 STANDING 136.0 105.2 19.9 18.4 889 16.9 42 2 STANDING 150.7 120.9 21.7 19.0 889 17.6 43 3 STANDING 163.5 134.7 23.1 19.6 889 18.2 49 10 STANDING 239.9 210.3 31.3 22.9 889 21.2 56 17 STANDING 341.7 309.7 40.9 25.0 889 24.2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 64 TREATMENT T2F0 CON ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 PRE-THIN 282.2 166.0 42.7 18.4 3333 12.8 40 0 STANDING 126.8 94.0 18.5 18.4 889 16.3 40 0 THINNINGS 155.5 72.0 24.3 18.4 2444 11.2 41 1 MORTALITY 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.5 25 0.0 41 1 STANDING 130.4 99.4 18.9 18.5 864 16.7 42 2 STANDING 136.3 106.4 19.6 18.8 864 17.0

93

43 3 STANDING 142.2 112.4 20.4 19.1 864 17.3 49 10 STANDING 202.0 173.4 27.4 21.6 864 20.1 56 17 MORTALITY 22.3 19.8 2.8 24.2 74 22.1 56 17 STANDING 260.7 232.6 32.7 24.2 790 23.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 65 TREATMENT T2F1 NP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 PRE-THIN 258.9 164.0 38.9 19.1 2988 12.9 40 0 STANDING 133.7 98.0 19.1 19.1 889 16.5 40 0 THINNINGS 125.3 66.0 19.8 19.1 2099 10.9 41 1 MORTALITY 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.4 25 0.0 41 1 STANDING 141.6 111.4 20.0 19.4 864 17.2 42 2 MORTALITY 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.8 25 0.0 42 2 STANDING 154.6 126.3 21.4 19.8 840 18.0 43 3 STANDING 166.4 138.1 22.7 20.3 840 18.6 49 10 MORTALITY 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.0 25 0.0 49 10 STANDING 236.8 208.7 30.1 22.0 815 21.7 56 17 MORTALITY 4.0 3.1 0.5 24.2 25 16.5 56 17 STANDING 334.5 304.7 38.7 24.2 790 25.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008.

94

THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 66 TREATMENT T2F0 CON ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 PRE-THIN 258.2 123.6 43.1 17.8 4173 11.5 40 0 STANDING 118.8 88.7 18.3 17.8 889 16.2 40 0 THINNINGS 139.4 34.9 24.8 17.8 3284 9.8 41 1 STANDING 123.9 93.8 18.9 18.1 889 16.5 42 2 STANDING 129.6 101.5 19.7 18.2 889 16.8 43 3 STANDING 133.9 105.9 20.3 18.3 889 17.0 49 10 STANDING 188.4 160.9 26.9 20.3 889 19.6 56 17 STANDING 270.1 240.8 35.3 22.2 889 22.5 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 67 TREATMENT T2F1 NP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 PRE-THIN 276.6 140.4 43.5 17.7 3728 12.2 40 0 STANDING 122.9 91.4 18.3 17.7 889 16.2 40 0 THINNINGS 153.7 48.9 25.2 17.7 2840 10.6 41 1 STANDING 131.1 100.7 19.3 18.0 889 16.6 42 2 MORTALITY 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.4 49 0.0 42 2 STANDING 138.9 111.4 20.2 19.4 840 17.5 43 3 STANDING 149.5 122.1 21.4 20.0 840 18.0 49 10 MORTALITY 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 49 0.0 49 10 STANDING 201.6 176.3 27.6 20.0 790 21.1

95

56 17 MORTALITY 20.5 18.7 2.5 24.4 49 25.5 56 17 STANDING 257.6 232.1 32.4 24.4 741 23.6 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 68 TREATMENT T2F1 NPS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 PRE-THIN 285.4 177.5 43.4 18.7 3185 13.2 40 0 STANDING 128.0 95.6 18.8 18.7 889 16.4 40 0 THINNINGS 157.4 81.9 24.6 18.7 2296 11.7 41 1 STANDING 137.0 106.6 19.9 19.1 889 16.9 42 2 STANDING 151.3 122.4 21.7 19.6 889 17.6 43 3 STANDING 163.4 134.5 23.1 20.0 889 18.2 49 10 STANDING 244.4 214.4 31.6 22.2 889 21.3 56 17 STANDING 357.4 324.4 41.7 24.9 889 24.4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY

96

STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 69 TREATMENT T2F1 N ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 PRE-THIN 296.0 168.2 47.2 17.7 3877 12.5 40 0 STANDING 121.7 91.7 18.5 17.7 914 16.1 40 0 THINNINGS 174.4 76.5 28.7 17.7 2963 11.1 41 1 STANDING 130.3 100.0 19.6 17.8 914 16.5 42 2 STANDING 144.1 113.7 21.4 18.3 914 17.3 43 3 STANDING 156.7 126.8 22.9 18.8 914 17.9 49 10 STANDING 230.8 202.0 31.1 21.3 914 20.8 56 17 STANDING 312.2 282.0 38.8 23.3 914 23.3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 70 TREATMENT T2F1 NPS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL TOP STEM MEAN AGE TRT COMP VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 PRE-THIN 268.7 145.4 45.3 18.3 4765 11.0 40 0 STANDING 118.5 87.5 18.2 18.3 938 15.7 40 0 THINNINGS 150.2 57.9 27.1 18.3 3827 9.5 41 1 STANDING 126.4 95.1 19.1 19.1 938 16.1 42 2 STANDING 139.9 110.4 20.9 19.6 938 16.8 43 3 STANDING 151.5 122.8 22.3 20.0 938 17.4 49 10 STANDING 214.5 186.8 30.0 21.5 938 20.2 56 17 STANDING 302.6 272.4 38.6 23.5 938 22.9 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm.

97

4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. 9.2 STAND AND STOCK TABLES THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 63 TREAT T2F1 N ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 40 PRE-THIN 5 1.7 0.0 642 40 PRE-THIN 10 9.7 0.0 1210 40 PRE-THIN 15 19.5 91.1 1111 40 PRE-THIN 20 12.8 74.2 469 40 STANDING 10 0.5 0.0 49 40 STANDING 15 9.5 45.6 519 40 STANDING 20 8.8 50.7 321 40 THINNINGS 5 1.7 0.0 642 40 THINNINGS 10 9.1 0.0 1160 40 THINNINGS 15 10.0 45.4 593 40 THINNINGS 20 4.1 23.5 148 41 STANDING 10 0.6 0.0 49 41 STANDING 15 9.4 46.6 494 41 STANDING 20 9.0 52.0 321 41 STANDING 25 1.0 6.6 25 42 STANDING 10 0.3 0.0 25 42 STANDING 15 8.7 43.7 444 42 STANDING 20 11.7 69.9 395 42 STANDING 25 1.1 7.4 25 43 STANDING 15 7.7 38.6 395 43 STANDING 20 14.4 88.0 469 43 STANDING 25 1.1 8.0 25 49 STANDING 15 1.4 7.0 74 49 STANDING 20 15.1 96.6 494 49 STANDING 25 14.8 106.8 321 56 STANDING 15 0.6 3.3 25 56 STANDING 20 8.8 58.7 272 56 STANDING 25 20.1 153.0 420 56 STANDING 30 11.4 94.8 173 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm.

98

4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 64 TREAT T2F0 ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 40 PRE-THIN 5 2.1 0.0 667 40 PRE-THIN 10 8.9 0.0 1136 40 PRE-THIN 15 17.6 80.4 1062 40 PRE-THIN 20 13.2 79.3 444 40 PRE-THIN 25 1.0 6.3 25 40 STANDING 10 1.0 0.0 99 40 STANDING 15 9.3 44.9 519 40 STANDING 20 8.2 49.1 272 40 THINNINGS 5 2.1 0.0 667 40 THINNINGS 10 7.9 0.0 1037 40 THINNINGS 15 8.3 35.5 543 40 THINNINGS 20 5.1 30.2 173 40 THINNINGS 25 1.0 6.3 25 41 MORTALITY 0 0.0 0.0 25 41 STANDING 10 0.7 0.0 74 41 STANDING 15 9.0 44.0 494 41 STANDING 20 8.1 48.8 272 41 STANDING 25 1.0 6.6 25 42 STANDING 10 0.5 0.0 49 42 STANDING 15 9.1 44.5 494 42 STANDING 20 9.0 54.9 296 42 STANDING 25 1.1 7.0 25 43 STANDING 10 0.5 0.0 49 43 STANDING 15 9.4 47.2 494 43 STANDING 20 8.4 51.3 272 43 STANDING 25 2.1 13.9 49 49 STANDING 10 0.2 0.0 25 49 STANDING 15 3.4 16.7 173 49 STANDING 20 15.3 95.6 494 49 STANDING 25 7.0 49.9 148 49 STANDING 30 1.5 11.3 25 56 MORTALITY 20 1.7 11.1 49 56 MORTALITY 25 1.2 8.7 25 56 STANDING 10 0.3 0.0 25 56 STANDING 15 0.9 4.7 49 56 STANDING 20 12.9 86.7 370 56 STANDING 25 11.7 85.5 247

99

56 STANDING 30 6.9 55.7 99 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 65 TREAT T2F1 NP ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 40 PRE-THIN 5 1.5 0.0 716 40 PRE-THIN 10 7.8 0.0 963 40 PRE-THIN 15 12.7 58.3 765 40 PRE-THIN 20 14.8 91.7 494 40 PRE-THIN 25 2.1 14.0 49 40 STANDING 10 1.7 0.0 148 40 STANDING 15 6.8 32.4 395 40 STANDING 20 8.4 51.6 296 40 STANDING 25 2.1 14.0 49 40 THINNINGS 5 1.5 0.0 716 40 THINNINGS 10 6.1 0.0 815 40 THINNINGS 15 5.9 25.9 370 40 THINNINGS 20 6.4 40.0 198 41 MORTALITY 0 0.0 0.0 25 41 STANDING 10 0.3 0.0 25 41 STANDING 15 7.8 35.6 469 41 STANDING 20 9.6 60.4 321 41 STANDING 25 2.3 15.4 49 42 MORTALITY 0 0.0 0.0 25 42 STANDING 15 6.6 30.3 395 42 STANDING 20 10.3 64.9 346 42 STANDING 25 4.5 31.1 99 43 STANDING 15 5.8 26.8 346 43 STANDING 20 12.2 77.5 395 43 STANDING 25 4.8 33.8 99 49 MORTALITY 0 0.0 0.0 25 49 STANDING 15 4.5 23.4 222 49 STANDING 20 8.8 58.2 272 49 STANDING 25 11.8 88.8 247 49 STANDING 30 5.0 38.4 74

100

56 MORTALITY 15 0.5 3.1 25 56 STANDING 15 2.2 13.2 99 56 STANDING 20 6.2 42.8 198 56 STANDING 25 12.3 96.8 247 56 STANDING 30 13.3 113.1 198 56 STANDING 35 4.7 38.8 49 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 66 TREAT T2F0 ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 40 PRE-THIN 5 2.7 0.0 1012 40 PRE-THIN 10 14.4 0.0 1802 40 PRE-THIN 15 18.9 83.4 1111 40 PRE-THIN 20 7.1 40.2 247 40 STANDING 10 0.6 0.0 49 40 STANDING 15 11.2 52.1 617 40 STANDING 20 6.4 36.6 222 40 THINNINGS 5 2.7 0.0 1012 40 THINNINGS 10 13.9 0.0 1753 40 THINNINGS 15 7.7 31.2 494 40 THINNINGS 20 0.7 3.7 25 41 STANDING 10 0.6 0.0 49 41 STANDING 15 11.1 52.0 593 41 STANDING 20 6.3 35.6 222 41 STANDING 25 1.0 6.2 25 42 STANDING 15 10.3 47.6 568 42 STANDING 20 8.4 47.3 296 42 STANDING 25 1.0 6.5 25 43 STANDING 15 10.0 46.5 543 43 STANDING 20 9.2 52.8 321 43 STANDING 25 1.0 6.6 25 49 STANDING 15 5.2 25.8 247 49 STANDING 20 14.8 87.7 494 49 STANDING 25 6.9 47.4 148 56 STANDING 15 0.6 3.0 25

101

56 STANDING 20 15.7 99.8 494 56 STANDING 25 14.1 100.3 296 56 STANDING 30 5.0 37.8 74 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 67 TREAT T2F1 NP ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 40 PRE-THIN 5 2.0 0.0 691 40 PRE-THIN 10 12.9 0.0 1556 40 PRE-THIN 15 18.1 78.4 1136 40 PRE-THIN 20 10.4 61.9 346 40 STANDING 10 0.6 0.0 49 40 STANDING 15 8.6 37.3 543 40 STANDING 20 9.1 54.1 296 40 THINNINGS 5 2.0 0.0 691 40 THINNINGS 10 12.4 0.0 1506 40 THINNINGS 15 9.5 41.1 593 40 THINNINGS 20 1.4 7.8 49 41 STANDING 10 0.3 0.0 25 41 STANDING 15 9.4 42.3 568 41 STANDING 20 8.6 51.9 272 41 STANDING 25 1.0 6.5 25 42 MORTALITY 0 0.0 0.0 49 42 STANDING 15 7.9 35.3 469 42 STANDING 20 8.1 48.7 272 42 STANDING 25 4.2 27.4 99 43 STANDING 15 7.8 35.9 444 43 STANDING 20 9.2 56.3 296 43 STANDING 25 4.5 30.0 99 49 MORTALITY 0 0.0 0.0 49 49 STANDING 15 5.3 27.5 247 49 STANDING 20 9.2 56.9 296 49 STANDING 25 8.3 57.9 173 49 STANDING 30 4.8 34.0 74 56 MORTALITY 20 0.9 6.4 25

102

56 MORTALITY 30 1.6 12.3 25 56 STANDING 15 1.2 6.5 49 56 STANDING 20 11.6 75.2 370 56 STANDING 25 7.4 53.6 148 56 STANDING 30 7.8 60.4 123 56 STANDING 35 4.3 36.5 49 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 68 TREAT T2F1 NPS ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 40 PRE-THIN 5 1.8 0.0 691 40 PRE-THIN 10 8.1 0.0 963 40 PRE-THIN 15 18.2 86.3 1037 40 PRE-THIN 20 13.0 77.1 444 40 PRE-THIN 25 2.2 14.1 49 40 STANDING 10 0.9 0.0 74 40 STANDING 15 10.0 48.5 543 40 STANDING 20 6.9 40.0 247 40 STANDING 25 1.1 7.1 25 40 THINNINGS 5 1.8 0.0 691 40 THINNINGS 10 7.3 0.0 889 40 THINNINGS 15 8.3 37.8 494 40 THINNINGS 20 6.1 37.1 198 40 THINNINGS 25 1.1 7.0 25 41 STANDING 10 0.3 0.0 25 41 STANDING 15 11.2 55.4 593 41 STANDING 20 7.3 43.4 247 41 STANDING 25 1.2 7.8 25 42 STANDING 15 9.6 48.4 494 42 STANDING 20 10.9 65.1 370 42 STANDING 25 1.3 8.9 25 43 STANDING 15 7.1 36.2 370 43 STANDING 20 13.6 81.4 469 43 STANDING 25 2.4 17.0 49 49 STANDING 15 2.1 11.5 99

103

49 STANDING 20 16.3 106.3 519 49 STANDING 25 11.4 82.0 247 49 STANDING 30 1.9 14.6 25 56 STANDING 15 0.5 2.9 25 56 STANDING 20 10.0 71.9 296 56 STANDING 25 18.8 145.5 395 56 STANDING 30 9.9 82.6 148 56 STANDING 35 2.5 21.5 25 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 69 TREAT T2F1 N ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 40 PRE-THIN 0 0.0 0.0 25 40 PRE-THIN 5 2.4 0.0 864 40 PRE-THIN 10 11.1 0.0 1358 40 PRE-THIN 15 21.1 94.8 1235 40 PRE-THIN 20 11.3 65.7 370 40 PRE-THIN 25 1.2 7.6 25 40 STANDING 0 0.0 0.0 25 40 STANDING 10 0.7 0.0 74 40 STANDING 15 11.2 53.5 593 40 STANDING 20 6.6 38.1 222 40 THINNINGS 5 2.4 0.0 864 40 THINNINGS 10 10.4 0.0 1284 40 THINNINGS 15 10.0 41.3 642 40 THINNINGS 20 4.7 27.6 148 40 THINNINGS 25 1.2 7.6 25 41 STANDING 0 0.0 0.0 25 41 STANDING 10 0.8 0.0 74 41 STANDING 15 11.7 58.2 593 41 STANDING 20 6.1 35.4 198 41 STANDING 25 1.0 6.4 25 42 STANDING 0 0.0 0.0 25 42 STANDING 10 0.8 0.0 74 42 STANDING 15 9.1 45.8 444

104

42 STANDING 20 10.3 60.5 346 42 STANDING 25 1.1 7.3 25 43 STANDING 0 0.0 0.0 25 43 STANDING 10 0.6 0.0 49 43 STANDING 15 7.6 38.6 370 43 STANDING 20 12.5 73.6 420 43 STANDING 25 2.2 14.6 49 49 STANDING 0 0.0 0.0 25 49 STANDING 15 2.8 13.8 148 49 STANDING 20 16.2 103.2 494 49 STANDING 25 10.4 71.9 222 49 STANDING 30 1.7 13.1 25 56 STANDING 0 0.0 0.0 25 56 STANDING 5 0.0 0.0 25 56 STANDING 15 1.0 5.0 49 56 STANDING 20 7.0 48.1 222 56 STANDING 25 20.6 150.7 444 56 STANDING 30 8.1 60.3 123 56 STANDING 35 2.2 17.9 25 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE FERTILIZATION & THINNING STUDY STAND & STOCK TABLES FOR THE SUB EXP (1973) PLOT 70 TREAT T2F1 NPS ----------------------------------------------- TOTAL STAND DIAM. BASAL MERCH. STEM AGE COMP CLASS AREA VOLUME COUNT (yrs) (cm) (m2/ha) (m3/ha) (/ha) ----------------------------------------------- 40 PRE-THIN 0 0.0 0.0 49 40 PRE-THIN 5 4.1 0.0 1728 40 PRE-THIN 10 10.9 0.0 1432 40 PRE-THIN 15 21.1 91.0 1259 40 PRE-THIN 20 7.9 46.4 272 40 PRE-THIN 25 1.2 8.0 25 40 STANDING 0 0.0 0.0 49 40 STANDING 10 1.0 0.0 99 40 STANDING 15 9.5 42.4 543 40 STANDING 20 6.4 37.1 222 40 STANDING 25 1.2 8.0 25 40 THINNINGS 5 4.1 0.0 1728

105

40 THINNINGS 10 9.8 0.0 1333 40 THINNINGS 15 11.6 48.6 716 40 THINNINGS 20 1.6 9.3 49 41 STANDING 0 0.0 0.0 49 41 STANDING 10 1.1 0.0 99 41 STANDING 15 9.4 43.1 519 41 STANDING 20 7.4 43.5 247 41 STANDING 25 1.3 8.5 25 42 STANDING 0 0.0 0.0 49 42 STANDING 10 0.5 0.0 49 42 STANDING 15 9.7 45.3 519 42 STANDING 20 8.2 48.6 272 42 STANDING 25 2.4 16.5 49 43 STANDING 0 0.0 0.0 49 43 STANDING 10 0.2 0.0 25 43 STANDING 15 9.4 44.7 494 43 STANDING 20 10.0 60.1 321 43 STANDING 25 1.1 7.7 25 43 STANDING 30 1.5 10.3 25 49 STANDING 0 0.0 0.0 49 49 STANDING 15 4.5 22.0 222 49 STANDING 20 14.8 89.4 469 49 STANDING 25 7.2 49.2 148 49 STANDING 30 3.5 26.2 49 56 STANDING 0 0.0 0.0 25 56 STANDING 5 0.0 0.0 25 56 STANDING 15 2.1 11.4 99 56 STANDING 20 11.1 70.7 346 56 STANDING 25 13.0 92.3 272 56 STANDING 30 9.9 77.8 148 56 STANDING 35 2.6 20.2 25 ----------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. 9.3 250 CROP TREES GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREES (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1987) PLOT 63 TREATMENT T2F1 N ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN

106

AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 STANDING 47.5 40.0 7.0 17.0 247 18.9 41 1 STANDING 51.0 43.5 7.4 17.2 247 19.5 42 2 STANDING 56.9 49.4 8.1 17.7 247 20.4 43 3 STANDING 62.0 54.4 8.6 18.2 247 21.1 49 10 STANDING 94.2 85.8 11.8 20.6 247 24.7 56 17 STANDING 134.3 124.8 15.4 23.1 247 28.2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREES (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1987) PLOT 64 TREATMENT T2F0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 STANDING 51.9 44.2 7.4 17.7 247 19.5 41 1 STANDING 54.5 46.7 7.7 17.9 247 19.9 42 2 STANDING 57.2 49.4 8.0 18.1 247 20.3 43 3 STANDING 59.8 52.1 8.3 18.2 247 20.7 49 10 STANDING 85.2 76.9 10.9 20.1 247 23.7 56 17 STANDING 120.3 111.3 14.4 22.0 247 27.2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008.

107

GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREES (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1987) PLOT 65 TREATMENT T2F1 NP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 STANDING 59.7 51.7 8.1 18.6 247 20.4 41 1 STANDING 64.9 56.9 8.7 19.0 247 21.1 42 2 STANDING 72.2 64.1 9.5 19.5 247 22.1 43 3 STANDING 77.7 69.5 10.0 19.9 247 22.7 49 10 STANDING 111.6 102.7 13.5 21.7 247 26.4 56 17 STANDING 159.1 148.9 17.7 24.2 247 30.2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREES (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1987) PLOT 66 TREATMENT T2F0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 STANDING 46.3 38.9 6.9 16.7 247 18.9 41 1 STANDING 48.2 40.8 7.1 16.8 247 19.2 42 2 STANDING 50.5 43.1 7.4 17.0 247 19.6 43 3 STANDING 52.1 44.7 7.7 17.1 247 19.9 49 10 STANDING 74.1 66.3 10.1 18.8 247 22.8 56 17 STANDING 104.2 95.6 13.1 20.8 247 26.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm.

108

4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREES (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1987) PLOT 67 TREATMENT T2F1 NP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 STANDING 51.8 44.3 7.5 17.5 247 19.6 41 1 STANDING 55.6 48.0 7.9 17.7 247 20.2 42 2 STANDING 61.3 53.7 8.6 18.1 247 21.1 43 3 STANDING 66.2 58.5 9.1 18.5 247 21.7 49 10 STANDING 94.6 86.5 12.5 19.8 247 25.4 56 17 STANDING 136.3 127.0 16.2 22.3 247 28.9 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREES (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1987) PLOT 68 TREATMENT T2F1 NPS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 STANDING 51.5 43.9 7.3 17.5 247 19.5 41 1 STANDING 55.4 47.7 7.8 17.8 247 20.1

109

42 2 STANDING 60.8 53.1 8.5 18.1 247 20.9 43 3 STANDING 65.6 57.8 9.0 18.5 247 21.5 49 10 STANDING 97.0 88.5 12.2 20.7 247 25.1 56 17 STANDING 142.9 133.1 16.1 23.6 247 28.8 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREES (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1987) PLOT 69 TREATMENT T2F1 N ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 STANDING 48.4 41.0 7.2 16.8 247 19.3 41 1 STANDING 52.2 44.8 7.7 17.1 247 19.9 42 2 STANDING 57.8 50.4 8.4 17.5 247 20.8 43 3 STANDING 62.8 55.3 9.0 17.8 247 21.5 49 10 STANDING 92.5 84.4 12.1 19.9 247 25.0 56 17 STANDING 126.1 117.2 15.5 21.6 247 28.2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY

110

CROP-TREES (~250/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1987) PLOT 70 TREATMENT T2F1 NPS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 STANDING 52.6 45.1 7.6 17.3 247 19.8 41 1 STANDING 56.3 48.7 8.1 17.5 247 20.4 42 2 STANDING 62.1 54.5 8.7 17.9 247 21.2 43 3 STANDING 67.4 59.7 9.3 18.4 247 21.9 49 10 STANDING 95.2 87.1 12.5 19.8 247 25.4 56 17 STANDING 133.6 124.4 16.1 22.0 247 28.8 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. 9.4 500 CROP TREES GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREES (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1987) PLOT 63 TREATMENT T2F1 N ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 STANDING 84.6 69.1 12.4 16.9 494 17.9 41 1 STANDING 90.6 75.2 13.1 17.1 494 18.4 42 2 STANDING 100.6 85.2 14.3 17.5 494 19.2 43 3 STANDING 109.5 94.0 15.3 18.0 494 19.8 49 10 STANDING 161.0 144.4 20.5 20.1 494 23.0 56 17 STANDING 229.7 211.4 26.8 22.3 494 26.3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm.

111

4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREES (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1987) PLOT 64 TREATMENT T2F0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 STANDING 85.1 69.3 12.3 17.0 494 17.8 41 1 STANDING 89.0 73.2 12.7 17.2 494 18.1 42 2 STANDING 93.2 77.4 13.2 17.4 494 18.5 43 3 STANDING 97.1 81.4 13.7 17.5 494 18.8 49 10 STANDING 138.8 122.7 18.3 19.2 494 21.7 56 17 STANDING 198.2 180.8 24.3 21.1 494 25.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREES (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1987) PLOT 65 TREATMENT T2F1 NP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 STANDING 98.2 82.2 13.6 17.8 494 18.8 41 1 STANDING 106.4 90.4 14.6 18.2 494 19.4

112

42 2 STANDING 118.3 102.2 15.9 18.6 494 20.3 43 3 STANDING 127.6 111.4 16.9 19.0 494 20.9 49 10 STANDING 187.1 169.9 23.1 20.9 494 24.4 56 17 STANDING 268.1 248.7 30.3 23.4 494 27.9 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREES (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1987) PLOT 66 TREATMENT T2F0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 STANDING 80.9 65.8 12.2 16.4 494 17.7 41 1 STANDING 84.5 69.4 12.6 16.5 494 18.0 42 2 STANDING 88.6 73.5 13.2 16.7 494 18.4 43 3 STANDING 91.7 76.7 13.6 16.8 494 18.7 49 10 STANDING 129.8 114.4 18.0 18.3 494 21.5 56 17 STANDING 186.0 169.3 23.7 20.3 494 24.7 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY

113

CROP-TREES (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1987) PLOT 67 TREATMENT T2F1 NP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 STANDING 80.7 65.0 11.9 16.6 494 17.5 41 1 STANDING 86.4 70.8 12.6 16.8 494 18.0 42 2 STANDING 95.2 79.7 13.7 17.1 494 18.8 43 3 STANDING 102.6 87.0 14.6 17.4 494 19.4 49 10 STANDING 146.2 130.3 19.7 18.8 494 22.6 56 17 STANDING 205.7 188.3 25.4 20.8 494 25.6 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREES (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1987) PLOT 68 TREATMENT T2F1 NPS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 STANDING 86.4 70.7 12.5 17.0 494 17.9 41 1 STANDING 92.6 77.0 13.3 17.3 494 18.5 42 2 STANDING 102.0 86.5 14.4 17.6 494 19.3 43 3 STANDING 110.5 94.9 15.4 17.9 494 19.9 49 10 STANDING 166.2 149.5 21.2 20.2 494 23.4 56 17 STANDING 243.0 224.1 27.9 22.8 494 26.8 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter.

114

7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREES (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1987) PLOT 69 TREATMENT T2F1 N ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 STANDING 82.3 67.0 12.3 16.5 494 17.8 41 1 STANDING 88.3 73.1 13.1 16.7 494 18.4 42 2 STANDING 98.0 82.9 14.3 17.0 494 19.2 43 3 STANDING 106.5 91.4 15.3 17.4 494 19.9 49 10 STANDING 158.3 142.2 20.9 19.5 494 23.2 56 17 STANDING 209.2 192.6 25.7 21.3 494 25.8 --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008. GROWTH & YIELD ESTIMATES FOR THE SHAWNIGAN LAKE STUDY CROP-TREES (~500/HA) SUMMARY FOR THE SUB EXP (1987) PLOT 70 TREATMENT T2F1 NPS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOT. YRS STAND TOTAL MERCH. BASAL AVE STEM MEAN AGE TRT CONDITION VOLUME VOLUME AREA HEIGHT COUNT DBH (yr) (m3/ha) (m3/ha) (m2/ha) (m) (/ha) (cm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 0 STANDING 82.9 67.9 12.5 16.2 494 17.9 41 1 STANDING 88.7 73.6 13.2 16.5 494 18.4 42 2 STANDING 97.9 82.9 14.3 16.8 494 19.2 43 3 STANDING 106.2 91.1 15.3 17.2 494 19.8 49 10 STANDING 151.1 135.4 20.5 18.7 494 23.0 56 17 STANDING 213.1 195.8 26.4 20.9 494 26.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------

115

NOTES: 1) Plot area = 0.0405 ha. 2) TOTAL & MERCH. VOLUME from the equations developed by Omule, et al (1987). 3) Minimum dbh tagging limit 2.6 cm. 4) TOTAL VOLUME whole stem, inside bark, and minimum dbh limit 2.6 cm. 5) MERCH. VOLUME inside bark, top diameter limit 10 cm, minimum dbh limit 12.5 cm, and stump height 30 cm. 6) MEAN DBH is quadratic mean diameter. 7) TOTAL AGE is age from planting. 8) YRS TRT is years after treatment. 9) Data were compiled by Agro Forestry Limited in 2008.

Shawnigan Lake analysis report - British Columbia · at Shawnigan Lake: A Preliminary Report of the...

Documents

Transcript of Shawnigan Lake analysis report - British Columbia · at Shawnigan Lake: A Preliminary Report of the...