Copy Not Do Copyright TAPA...© TAPA 2020 Trucking Security Requirements
SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST,...
-
Upload
john-douglas -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST,...
-
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
1/18
i
Shadow, Substance,
Coincidence, Significance:
The infancy narratives of
Samuel, John the Baptist,
Jesus and Mason Duries
Tapa Wha model
Paper presented to the 2009 Annual meeting of
Aotearoa/New Zealand Association of Biblical Studies
(ANZABS) at Dunedin, New Zealand
John C. Douglas12/8/2009
-
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
2/18
ii
Abstract
The birth narrative texts of Samuel, John the Baptist and Jesus contain a significant
level of concurrent language within the developmental summaries of each person. A
comparison of the summary statements of Jesus development (Luke 2:40, 52) is made with
the Samuel phraseology (1 Sam. 2:21b, 26) and its progress or addition of wisdom. The
paper outlines how the Samuel and Jesus texts hold a degree of resemblance with the
Baptists development summary (Luke 1:80), in that, he continued to grow and become
strong in spirit. The broadest conflations of the tri-textual materials indicate a four-fold
development of the persons. In the Aotearoa/New Zealand environment Professor Mason
Durie (1994) described the four-fold developmental Tapa Wha model containing the same
headings of the infancy narratives tri-textual conflation. This paper surveys the textual
material and outlines correspondences of Duries model from the perspective of their
potential contribution to the framing of a working hermeneutic.
John C. Douglas,
Tauranga, New Zealand
The meetings full schedule of presented papers can be viewed athttp://anzabs.blogspot.com/
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://anzabs.blogspot.com/http://anzabs.blogspot.com/http://anzabs.blogspot.com/http://anzabs.blogspot.com/mailto:[email protected] -
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
3/18
1
Shadow, Substance, Coincidence, Significance: The infancy
narratives of Samuel, John the Baptist, Jesus and Mason Duries
Tapa Wha model.1
Presented by John C. Douglas to the Annual meeting of ANZABS in Dunedin,78 December 2009
Over a number of years in the general discussions and academic endeavour the term
capital has morphed in nomenclature. It has lost its previous ability to stand alone, now
when seen in public it is generally in the company of an adjective. In fact there are four of
them who may alternatively hang together with it; fiscal/material, intellectual, social, or
spiritual. Yet, capital often seen as power is not to be regarded as essentially such, or should
it be reduced to collateral towards means for achieving ends. It is that, and much more than
that. Nor is it merely acquired or amassed, its fourfold-existence necessitates capitals
essential development and stewardship in community. Within Aotearoa/New Zealand
academic endeavours, there is ongoing engagement and output of studies analysing,
synthesising or applying operational relevancies all of the capitals. In our context (biblical
studies) a tacit outsider assumption is the fourth one, the spiritual, would most probably our
interest. I hasten to suggest, not so. Study of, within and from the biblical text is diverse by
nature. It is from this background I offer a brief survey of the birth narrative texts of
Samuel, John the Baptist and Jesus; focus on concurrent language within the developmental
summaries of each person, outline correspondences of Duries model from the perspective of
possible connection in the framing of a working hermeneutic.
SURVEYING THE TEXTUAL MATERIAL
Narrative or story is the most common single type of writing in the text; its volume
approximates forty percent of Biblical material. It is not generic story; it embraces an
1Mason Durie, Whaiora: Maori Health Development, 2nd ed. (Auckland: Oxford University Press,
1994).
-
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
4/18
2
extensive classification of genre. Like capital, its genre associates extensively with adjectives
which at times seemingly an enormously encompassing crowd of analysis. It should be
noted that the nomenclature prefixes are by no means universally applied or accepted.
Birth Narratives and their Common Features
In the biblical text birth accounts of the persons whom community narratives are
woven around are literary commonplace. Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, Samson, Samuel,2
John the Baptist and Jesus.
There are several designations applied to these narratives, namely; birth narratives,3
infancy narrative,4 childhood narrative,5 or genesis introductions.
As integral parts of longer complexes they need to be read against a broader
background for proper understanding. They commonly convey the introductory elements
within the larger stories of a person, their community/nation/people. In general, textual birth
stories are reserved for extraordinary rather than routine births, which are briefly chronicled
instead of receiving a full-fledged birth story. The more extended biblical birth narratives
tend loosely to follow a general pattern:6 1) a barren wife or couple desire a child, 2) an angel
appears to announce the promise of a son, 3) the birth occurs, accompanied by miracles or
extraordinary events, 4) hostile forces threaten the newborn baby, 5) God protects the child so
that he or she may grow to maturity, and 6) the grown person becomes a hero, saint or
saviour. Realising of course not every ingredient is present in every birth story, for example
2First Testament examples are generally defined as birth reports. Timothy D. Finlay, The Birth
Report Genre in the Hebrew Bible (Tbingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2005), 1.
3William Manson, The Gospel of Luke (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1930), xx.
4Raymond Edward Brown, The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in
Matthew and Luke, 1st ed. (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1977), 25.
5Walter L. Liefeld,Luke: The Expositor's Bible Commentary , ed. Frank Ely Gaebelein, 14 vols., vol. 8
(Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan, 1995), 823.
6Birth Story in Leland Ryken and others,Dictionary of Biblical Imagery (Downers Grove, Ill.:
InterVarsity Press, 1998), 90.
-
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
5/18
3
Alters work on Hebrew birth-report genre sees that ancient Hebrew convention narrated the
birth of a hero through first three.7
In a consideration of the birth stories, this paper identifies four in its general-scope,
and will engage briefly three of them. The general considerations8 have been narrowed by
three factors; 1) Common factors in Semitic style and hymn/song material, 2) a
growth/development summary of the child, and 3) the grown childs later connection to
discipling community.
Birth of Samson(Judges 13:2-25)
Birth of Samuel(1 Sam 1:1--2:11)
Birth of John(Luke 1:5-25, 57-80)
Birth of Jesus(Luke 1:26-38; 2:1-40)
Mother's
Situation
Anonymous Wife:
barrenHannah: barren Elizabeth: barren, old
Mary: virgin, not yet
married
Father's RoleManoah: dialogueswith wife
Elkanah: comfortsHannah
Zechariah: priest intemple
Joseph: no major role
Child Requested (not explicit) by Hannah's prayerby Zechariah's prayer
(implicit)(not requested)
Birth Announcedby an angel to thewoman
by Eli's assurance toHannah
by angel Gabriel toZechariah
by angel Gabriel to Mary
Initial ReactionWoman tells herhusband
Eli thinks Hannah isdrunk
Zechariah questions /doubts
Mary questions / believes
Result of
AnnouncementAngel appears again to
both
Hannah conceives from
husband
Elizabeth conceives
from husband
Mary conceives from Holy
Spirit
Birth of Child brief mention (13:24a)very brief mention
(1:20)
brief narration
(1:57-58)
extensive narration
(2:1-20)
Circumcision (not mentioned) (not mentioned)extensive narration
(1:59-79)brief mention (2:21)
Boy's NameSamson(13:24a)
Samuel(1:20)
John(1:13, 59-63)
Jesus(1:31, 35; 2:21)
Reaction
Praising God
(sacrifice offered
before birth)
by Hannah
(2:1-10)
by Zechariah
(1:67-79)
by Mary (1:46-55)
by angels (2:8-14);
by shepherds (2:20)by Simeon (2:28-32)
Child Growsmentioned briefly(13:24b-25)
(1:24-28; 2:11)mentioned only briefly(1:80)
incident at age twelve(2:40-52)9
FIGURE #1:ANALYSIS OF SAMPSON,SAMUEL,JOHN THE BAPTIST AND JESUS BIRTH TEXTS
7Robert Alter,Biblical Type-Scenes and the Uses of Convention (Chicago: University of Chicago,
1978), 118-120.
8Ryken and others, 90.
9Felix S.J. Just, Ph.D. , "The Infancy Narratives in Luke's Gospel" http://catholic-
resources.org/Bible/Luke-Infancy.htm (accessed 11/25/2009).
-
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
6/18
4
Of the possible four stories, Samson (Judges 13:2-25), Samuel (1 Samuel 1:12:11), John
the Baptist (Luke 1:5-25, 57-80), and, Jesus (Luke 1:26-38; 2:1-52), the Samson narrative
does not meet the narrowed criteria.
Common factors in Semitic style and hymn/song material
The Samuel narrative sits in Hebrew community text, is essentially Semitic in style,
and shares these common rudiments through Lukes LXX styled vocabulary in his birth
narrative accounts.10 There are three elements to the narrative, 1) the barrenness of Hannah
with her prayer and covenant she will give the sought son to the Lord (1 Samuel 1;11), 2) her
response through prophetic poem/song in the giving the son/boy Samuel to the Lord at the
Shiloh tabernacle/temple (1 Samuel 1: 24-2:10), and 3) Samuels continuing growth,
development and spiritual maturity under Elis care at Shiloh (1 Samuel 2:21b, 26).
The similarity of material in Hannahs song (1 Samuel 2:1-11), with those of Mary
(Luke 1:46-55) and Zachariah (Luke 1:68-79), Youngblood suggests, It may well be that
Hannah's song is seedplot for Mary's Magnificat also the Song of Zechariah.11
In the narratives of both John the Baptist and Jesus one distinctive characteristic is an
atmosphere reminiscent of the First Testament, with a grammatical and stylistic Semitic
cast.12 Tyson in considering Lukes use of images from Judaism in Luke/Acts, notes:
The influence of the LXX on Luke is most obvious in the infancy narratives. Not only is there a
multitude of quotations and allusions to a wide variety of texts from the Hebrew scriptures in their
Greek translation, but the linguistic style itself appears to be a conscious imitation of Septuagintallanguage.
13
10Liefeld.
11Ronald F. Youngblood, 1 & 2 Samuel: The Expositor's Bible Commentary, ed. Frank Ely Gaebelein,
14 vols., vol. 3 (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan, 1992), 570.
12Liefeld.
13Joseph B. Tyson,Images of Judaism in Luke-Acts (Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina
Press, 1992). 46.
-
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
7/18
-
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
8/18
6
was rare; there were not many visions. The narrators summaries identify observable
progress in three developmental quadrants. Physical, growth in stature (2:26), spiritual,
grew up in the presence of the Lord (2:21b), and favour with the Lord (2:26), and social,
favour with men (2:26).
The Baptists development summary follows as conclusion to the prophecy-song of
Zechariah.18 While the conception and birth of John are connected by the recital of angelic
announcement to Zechariah (Luke 1:11-20), concurrent witness of the Spirit in Elizabeths
encounter with Mary (1:39-45), and extensive narration of Johns circumcision (1:59-79); the
text serves as both terminal summary and transition.
And the child grew and became strong in spirit; and he lived in the desert until he appeared publicly to
Israel.19
In the 1:80 text, Luke summarises observable progress in two developmental quadrants;
physical, the child grew, and spiritual, became strong in spirit. It is important to note at
this point, some scholars (Brown 1977: 374; Schweizer 1984: 44) regard the reference to
as reference to the Holy Spirit; while others (Hendriksen 1978: 132; Godet 1887:
1.117; Schweitzer, TDNT6:415), see the pneuma reference more naturally refers to Johns
personal spirit, based on the observation it is placed next to the idea of physical strength.
Bock comments, Such growth (physical and personal spirit) is related to Gods Spirit, but
the Lukes primary point is Johns growth.20 In Lukes ending his weaving of Jesus and
Johns birth stories, shifting to concentrate on the Messiahs birth he anticipatorily sets the
Baptists developmental continuance in the desert until he appears publicly to Israel (3:2).
The prophetic song-poem of Zechariah is the central defining event against which the
developmental summary is set.
18Luke 1:80
19Ibid.
20 Darrell L. Bock,Luke (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan Pub. House, 1996). 194.
-
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
9/18
7
The Jesus development summaries are set at two points the developees chronological
age, the second later than those of the previous persons are. Samuels is within his
childhood, designated by the recurring use of word boy (1 Samuel 2:11b, 18, 21b, 26) in
the summarys context. Johns summary is in his circumcision narrative (Luke 1:59-80).
Jesus summaries are set firstly, flowing his presentation at the temple and childhood return to
Nazareth (2:39-40), and secondly following his second temple visit, encounter with the
elders, self-conscious statement in reply to Mary and Josephs questioning (2:48),
"Why were you searching for me? . . . Didn't you know I had to be in my Father's house?"
and second return to Nazareth. Both summaries mark separate defining events and
transitions, with the common locative factors of the Jerusalem and home life in Nazareth.
Noland (1989),21 and Brown (1977)22 see a parallel in the manner in which the first event is
narrated to be under the influence of 1 Samuel 12 (c.f. Luke 2:22) in the bringing of the
child to the temple. Liefeld cites the significance rests in that Jesus' parents were faithful to
the Jewish law and that the child grew normally.23 The Luke 2:40 growth summary defines
observable progress in three developmental quadrants. Physical the child grew and became
strong,intellectual, he was filled with wisdom, and spiritual, the grace of God was upon
him. The second and fullest summary (2:52) covers Jesus development in all quadrants;
stating he grew intellectually, grew in wisdom, physically, grew in stature, spiritually,
grew in favour with God, and grew socially, in favour with men/others. Bock notes, the
mention of both God and humans is a way of saying that all perceived the
growth/development of Jesus.24 This extension of the three quadrants into all quadrants
21John Nolland,Luke, Word Biblical Commentary (Dallas, TX: Word Books, 1989). 124.
22Brown., 450ff.
23Liefeld. 560.
24 Bock. 274.
-
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
10/18
8
through the inclusion of the social, is associative with the Samuel summary (1 Samuel 2:26),
not isolated citation.
The summaries of Samuel, John, and Jesus in survey include all quadrants. The
wisdom designation applied twice and only to Jesus, social to both Samuel and Jesus, and
while both the physical and spiritual applied to all persons, the spiritual is in all texts.
INTELLECTUAL PHYSICAL SPIRITUAL SOCIAL
Samuel 1 Sam. 2:21b -- --grew up in the presence of
the LORD--
Samuel 1 Sam. 2:26 -- Grow in stature favor with the LORD favor with men
John B Luke 1:80 -- Child grew became strong in spirit --
Jesus Luke 2:40filled with
wisdom became strong; grace of God was upon him --
Jesus Luke 2:52 Wisdom stature favour with God favour with men
2 4 5 2
FIGURE #2:ANALYSIS OF SAMUEL,JOHN THE BAPTIST AND JESUS BIRTH TEXTS BY QUADRANTS
The birth narrative texts of Samuel, John the Baptist and Jesus contain a significant level of
concurrent language within the developmental summaries of each person. The comparison of
the summary statements of Jesus development (Luke 2:40, 52) is made with the Samuel
phraseology (1 Sam. 2:21b, 26) and its progress or addition of wisdom. The Samuel and
Jesus texts hold a degree of resemblance with the Baptists development summary (Luke
1:80) in the statement John continued to grow and become strong in spirit. The broadest
conflations of the tri-textual summary materials of these infancy narratives indicate four-fold
development.
The grown childs later connection to discipling community
Each summary expresses ongoing and observable growth of persons. Each narrative
context included a hymn/song or prophetic poem relating to the glory and glorious actions of
God, future social justice and divine kindness, the future of Israel and in the Song of
Zechariah or Benedictus (Luke 1:66-67), the future ministry of the child John toward
-
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
11/18
9
Israel and its Messiah is declared. Declaration precedes or opens narrative, summary is in the
textual transition, in the following narratives of the Samuel chronicler and Luke as
author/narrator each now grown child connects to a discipling community.
Samuel is judge, prophet, and priest in Israel. It is the second office through which he
emerges to prominence; it is also the one, which connects him to leadership in a discipling
community. He embraces the spectrum of prophecy. He is narrated as a distinct prophet
(3:19-4:1a), symphonic prophet (2:27-3:18) and leader of prophets in community (19:20ff).
Youngblood notes;
Saul's men "saw" (not "heard") Samuel's disciples "prophesying" (v. 20) Each such group of
prophets had a "leader" (19:20) or "father" (10:12; 2 Kings 2:12), in this case Samuel.25
The summarized physical, spiritual, and social growth elements of Samuel are
evidenced with relationships in the ongoing narration.
John the Baptist, while speaking as a voice in the wilderness is deeply connected to
others in discipling community. John as a preacher and prophetic-herald is addressed as
teacher (3:12) by seeking tax collectors. On two occasions, Luke specifically refers to
Johns disciples (5:33; 7:18); he also notes John had taught his disciples to pray (11:1).
Johns teaching of the practice of baptism endures and influences deeply into Lukes Acts
narrative (18:25; 19:3-4). Johns ministry, prominence, strength of spirit, and life are
extensively applied by Jesus in challenges to both sincere and hostile hearers (7:24ff; 16:16;
20:6). John not only developed a discipling community, it endured beyond his lifetime and
with his disciples being early26 and late adopters of Jesus. Liefeld notes;
25Youngblood. 567.
26John 1:35-42 records disciples of John transitioning to becoming followers of Jesus and joining into
his incipient community. The presenter has not included this note into the read paper, as the focus is to deal
with 1 Samuel and Lucan material in the presentation.
-
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
12/18
10
The fact that John still had "disciples" (Luke 7:18, 20) does not necessarily mean he had been
continuing a separate movement because of uncertainty about the Messiah. A number continued with
John even after he had pointed them to Jesus.27
Jesus clearly called people to follow Him (5:27; 9:23; 18:22). He did not hesitate to
share all quadrants of his developed life with a discipling community. His teaching, leading
actions, briefing, de-briefing, and training of the twelve (9:1-9) and the seventy (10:1-22) are
framed in intellectual/wisdom, physical, spiritual, and social interactions.
The ongoing narrative texts of Samuel, John, and Jesus indicate they developed
communities, which continued to some observable degree to provide influence and specific
strengths into the progress of hope in Israel.
DURIES MODEL AND TEXTUAL-CORRESPONDENCES
The model did not appear off a planning board. It is organic, rooted in community
narrative and was originally framed as a summary.
Tapa Whas recent origins arise from an August 1982 training session for
fieldworkers in the Mori Womens Welfare League project, Rapuora. Starting from the
addresses in the welcome and extending through the gathering the speakers spoke directly to
health concerns ofMori.28
The importance of wairua [spirituality] as a starting point for health (kumatua Tapuna
te Hira), Mental illness and health (Henry Bennett), common physical disorders amongst
Mori (Dr. Jim Hodge). Psychiatrist, Dr. Mason Durie speaking publically drew the
contributed themes together at the close of the session calling them 1) taha wairua, 2) taha
hinengaro, 3) taha tinana, and 4) taha Whanau.
Mason Durie's whare tapawha model compares hauora to the four walls of a whare
(house), each wall representing a different dimension: taha wairua (the spiritual side); taha
27Liefeld.
28 Durie. 69.
-
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
13/18
11
hinengaro (thoughts and feelings); taha tinana (the physical side); and taha whanau (family).
The model asserts all four dimensions are necessary for strength and symmetry.29
FIGURE #3:WHARE TAPA WHA MODEL30
Durie commented in his workWhairoa: Mori Health Development (1998) on the
integrated nature of the model:
Underlying the whare tapa wha model is the consistent theme of integration. Individual health is built
into a larger system, the boundary between personal and family identity being frequently blurred.Similarly, the division between temporal and spiritual, thoughts and feelings, mental and physical are
not as clear-cut as they are in Western thinking since the advent of Cartesian dualism.31
In ongoing writing, community interaction and application ofDuriesdevelopmental
summary in Mori health (hauora), his comments of Western caution should be noted. Te
Whare Tapa Wha as narrative is not a story about people; it is out of the people. In birth
narrative reflection the summary of its integrated quadrants arise out of Mori health journey
narrative. As text the model is community property in a manner similar to the surveyed
birth narratives.
29Ibid., 70.
30The model as depicted in; Howard Fancy,Health and Physical Education in the New Zealand
Curriculum (Wellington: Learning Media Limited, 1999), 31.
31 Durie. 73.
-
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
14/18
12
The Whare Tapa Wha model is framed within broadest conflation of the tri-textual
materials infancy narratives headings indicate a four-fold development of
peoples/communities, especially in regard to the health ofMori in an Aotearoa/New Zealand
environment
PERSPECTIVES IN CONTRIBUTING TO THE FRAMING OF
A WORKING HERMENEUTIC
I commenced this paper by referring to four capitals; then a survey of the birth
narratives has considered the quadrants of development within the relevant texts, and with a
third, reflection given to the four walls of Te Whare Tapa Wha.
FIGURE #4:QUADRANT ELEMENTS OF JESUSLUKE 2:52 SUMMARISED DEVELOPMENT AS PAIRED AGAINST
TAPA WHAS STATEMENTS AND THE FOURCAPITALS
In dealing with biblical, written, or other life texts, the discipline/science of
hermeneutics is both sub-conscious and conscious act. In earlier Christian history the
practice of hermeneutics was functionally Antiochian or Alexandrian, and while that is a long
time ago for some old habits die hard. I am aware I draw a challenge when seeking
-
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
15/18
13
working hermeneutics in narrative theology, especially when seeking to engage so-called
universal scripture text with local, limited and community specific interpretation. This is
implicit in sometime designated postmodern hermeneutics. Maarten Wisse outlines three
popular maxims of narrative theology:
(1) that narrative expressions do not have the universal pretensions of propositional expressions of
faith; (2) that references in narrative always remain implicit in the story whereas, in propositional
expressions, they are always explicit; and (3) that narrative forms of expression are typically associatedwith the ambiguity of reference, whereas propositional forms are typically associated with lack of
ambiguity.32
The considerations of scholarship in my reading have drawn extensively on works
considering the contributions from source and form critical studies; this is done with the
intention of deliberation on potential input from historic communities related in one or more
ways to the persons of the birth narrations. Four term-words share in my consideration of
identifying a suitable working hermeneutic; namely, shadow, substance, coincidence and
significance. Against the background of reading the texts, including Duries model, from a
community perspective my thoughts on the term-words infer the following considerations:
Shadow, not reading from the pervious typology perspective of hidden future reality,
but asking what exists in the text, which can exist in the narrative of contemporary
community of practice?
Substancethe summary of our working reality/praxis resonates with the reality of
the text, but not an imposed conformity (I.e. A this-is-that interpretation).
Coincidencethrough observing the continuing coming together or co-inciding of
implications from the text to the reading community.
Significancethe findings and considerations of the internal text and external textual
influencing material is too closely correlated to be attributed to chance and therefore
indicating a systematic relation, the voice of the text to the reading community.
32Maarten Wisse, "Narrative Theology and the Use of the Bible in Systematic Theology,"Ars
Disputandi Volume 5 (2005). 1.
-
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
16/18
14
In identifying, a working-hermeneutic for a community reading and relating its
development and hauora (wellbeing) to textual narrative we should be expecting some
configuration of a process that enables text to inform, imply, indicate, or initiate.
-
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
17/18
15
Reference Bibliography
Alter, Robert.Biblical Type-Scenes and the Uses of Convention. Chicago: University of Chicago,1978.
Auld, A. Graeme. "Exegetical Notes on I Samuel 2:18-20, 26: 'Now Samuel Continued to Grow'."Expository Times 118, no. 2 (2006): 87-88.
Bock, Darrell L.Luke. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan Pub. House, 1996.
Brown, Raymond Edward. The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives inMatthew and Luke. 1st ed. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1977.
Campbell, Antony F. 1 SamuelThe Forms of the Old Testament Literature. Grand Rapids, Mich.:
W.B. Eerdmans, 2003.
Chakoian, Karen. "Luke 2:41-52."Interpretation 52, no. 2 (1998): 185-190.
Durie, Mason. Whaiora: Maori Health Development. 2nd ed. Auckland: Oxford University Press,1994.
________. Mauri Ora: The Dynamics of Maori Health. Auckland, N.Z.: Oxford University Press,2001.
Ehrlich, Carl S., and Marsha C. White. Saul in Story and Tradition Forschungen Zum AltenTestament,. Tbingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006.
Fancy, Howard.Health and Physical Education in the New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington:
Learning Media Limited, 1999.
Farris, Stephen. The Hymns of Luke's Infancy Narratives: Their Origin, Meaning and SignificanceJournal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series, 0309-0787. Sheffield: JSOT,1985.
Finlay, Timothy D. The Birth Report Genre in the Hebrew Bible. Tbingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2005.
Godet, Frdric Louis.A Commentary on the Gospel of St. Luke. New York,: Funk & Wagnalls, 1887.
Hendriksen, William.New Testament Commentary : Exposition of the Gospel According to Luke NewTestament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1978.
Just, Felix S.J., Ph.D. , "The Infancy Narratives in Luke's Gospel"http://catholic-resources.org/Bible/Luke-Infancy.htm (accessed 11/25/2009).
Liefeld, Walter L.Luke: The Expositor's Bible Commentary. Vol. 8. 14 vols., ed. Frank ElyGaebelein. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan, 1995.
Manson, William. The Gospel of Luke. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1930.
Marshall, I. Howard. The Gospel of Luke : A Commentary on the Greek Text. 1st American ed. TheNew International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1978.
http://catholic-resources.org/Bible/Luke-Infancy.htmhttp://catholic-resources.org/Bible/Luke-Infancy.htmhttp://catholic-resources.org/Bible/Luke-Infancy.htmhttp://catholic-resources.org/Bible/Luke-Infancy.htmhttp://catholic-resources.org/Bible/Luke-Infancy.htmhttp://catholic-resources.org/Bible/Luke-Infancy.htm -
8/8/2019 SHADOW, SUBSTANCE, COINCIDENCE, SIGNIFICANCE: THE INFANCY NARRATIVES OF SAMUEL, JOHN THE BAPTIST, JE
18/18
16
________. The Gospel of Luke: A Commentary on the Greek Text. 1st American ed. The NewInternational Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1978.
McClendon, James William.Biography as Theology; How Life Stories Can Remake Today's
Theology. Nashville,: Abingdon Press, 1974.
Nolland, John.Luke Word Biblical Commentary. Dallas, TX: Word Books, 1989.
Rowles Waetford, Cheryl Moana. "A Literature Review of Spiritual Capital, Developments ofSpirituality in the Workplace, and Contributions from a Mori Perspective." Unpublished,Auckland, 2007.
Ryken, Leland, Jim Wilhoit, Tremper Longman, Colin Duriez, Douglas Penney, and Daniel G. Reid.Dictionary of Biblical Imagery. Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 1998.
Schweizer, Eduard. The Good News According to Luke. Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1984.
Tyson, Joseph B. "The Birth Narratives and the Beginning of Luke's Gospel." Semeia, no. 52 (1990):103-120.
________.Images of Judaism in Luke-Acts. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press,1992.
Wisse, Maarten "Narrative Theology and the Use of the Bible in Systematic Theology." ArsDisputandi Volume 5 (2005): 12.
Youngblood, Ronald F. 1 & 2 Samuel: The Expositor's Bible Commentary. Vol. 3. 14 vols., ed. FrankEly Gaebelein. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan, 1992.