SgrA* in the Mid-IR
description
Transcript of SgrA* in the Mid-IR
![Page 1: SgrA* in the Mid-IR](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56814f73550346895dbd25b3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SgrA* in the Mid-IR
Mark Morris, Andrea Ghez, Eric Becklin,
Angelle TannerUCLA
![Page 2: SgrA* in the Mid-IR](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56814f73550346895dbd25b3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Motivation
Markoff et al. 2001
Yuan et al. 2003
![Page 3: SgrA* in the Mid-IR](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56814f73550346895dbd25b3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
4=micron image from Gemini South, locating SgrA*, give scale
Argue that this is where we start to lose stars and gain dust
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
4 µm image of SgrA West(Gemini South)courtesy of Nigel Sharp
![Page 4: SgrA* in the Mid-IR](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56814f73550346895dbd25b3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
4 µm detail
![Page 5: SgrA* in the Mid-IR](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56814f73550346895dbd25b3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Stolovy et al. results - afew slides
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Stolovy, Hayward,& Herter 1996
![Page 6: SgrA* in the Mid-IR](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56814f73550346895dbd25b3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Stolovy et al. 1996, continued
8.7 µm Flux limit: 25 mJy
![Page 7: SgrA* in the Mid-IR](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56814f73550346895dbd25b3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Sgr A West with Keck/MIRLIN
3-color, 8 - 21 µm(deconvolved)
Morris, Ressler, Ghez, Becklin, Tanner, Cotera, Werner
6” = 0.25 pc
![Page 8: SgrA* in the Mid-IR](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56814f73550346895dbd25b3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Observations with Keck/LWS:
Part of campaign to observe simultaneously with Chandra in May 2002
Keck: alternating between near-IR and mid-IR on 4 nights
Instrument: LWS, using wide SiC filter, centered at about 11 µm Observing near the diffraction limit (~0.3”) with 0.08” pixels
![Page 9: SgrA* in the Mid-IR](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56814f73550346895dbd25b3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
A few campaign charts
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
![Page 10: SgrA* in the Mid-IR](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56814f73550346895dbd25b3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The LWS result -- global
6”
LWS, 11 µm
![Page 11: SgrA* in the Mid-IR](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56814f73550346895dbd25b3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Detail
4.4”
![Page 12: SgrA* in the Mid-IR](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56814f73550346895dbd25b3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The LWS result -- detail
![Page 13: SgrA* in the Mid-IR](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56814f73550346895dbd25b3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Mid-IR Conclusions
It will be difficult to improve on the steady-state limitbecause of the background spatial variations.
However, a fluctuating component is within reach.
More work needs to be done with this data set
![Page 14: SgrA* in the Mid-IR](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56814f73550346895dbd25b3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Monitoring the 3mm Flux of SgrA* with the Owens Valley Millimeter Interferometer
Jon Mauerhan, Mark Morris, Fabian Walter, Fred Baganoff
8 successive days of observations during the May 2002 campaign
Key: rapid alternation between SgrA* and a nearby calibrator, ~1.5o away.Differencing all done in the UV plane with respect to an average determinedfrom the rest of the data set.
![Page 15: SgrA* in the Mid-IR](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56814f73550346895dbd25b3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Power spectrum
4-min bins
Flux=0 corresponds to1.8 Jy for SgrA*
![Page 16: SgrA* in the Mid-IR](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56814f73550346895dbd25b3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Conclusions
Clear variability not attributable to atmosphere, antennagains, but like Zhao’s SMA result, cannot rule out variable polarization as the cause, except that the 99-GHz polarizationis below the 150-GHz depolarization threshold.
Amplitude of few-hour (~2.5-hour) variations varies with mean flux (tentative).
Apparent quasi-periodic variations are not phased from dayto day.