Portal block saw "ORTOBRETON 4EG/800-SFO or 4EG/1100-SFO” for granite
sfo /SAFIR maY 2011
-
Upload
giselle-dodson -
Category
Documents
-
view
35 -
download
2
description
Transcript of sfo /SAFIR maY 2011
sfo/SAFIR maY 2011
P. Vo Tan, Paris N. Jabbur, BeyrouthS. Zaluski, Perpignan P. Rozot, MarseilleJ. Blondel, Nice G. Grabner, Salzbourg M.H Duret, Lille D. O’Brart, Londres
1-month post-op20 patients with bilateral cataract Mean age 71. 8 years (44-87)Pre-Op astigmatism ≤ 1 dptIncision size 2.2/2.4 mmIOL power= 21.1 ±1.4 dpt
Multifocal, Monobloc, Hydrophilic Acrylic Diffractive aspheric anterior surface Addition of +3.5 D (IOL plane)
SE Post-Op
1-month post-op
1-month post-op
Do you wear correcting glasses?
Are you satisfied with your vision?
Youngest patient (44 years)
Ongoing study M.H Duret, Lille
Diff Add (HumanOptics) +3,5 0 D (n=9) AT LISA (Zeiss) Add +3,75 D (n=12)Micro F (Physiol) Add +3,50 et +1,75 D (n=5)
Mono (Aspira, n=30)
Roessler, Küchle WOC 2010MH Duret
The new multifocal Diffractiva-aA provides excellent visual
acuity at near and far distances as well as good intermediate
distance results
The Diffractiva-aA is able to provide a high rate of spectacle
independence and minimal photic phenomena at night
The excellent visual performance of the Diffractiva-aA is
reflected by the high level of patients’ satisfaction
The defocus curves show that, as expected, the trifocal
micro F (Physiol) provides better intermediate vision than the
two bifocal IOLs but the Diffractiva-aA outperforms the AT-
LISA (Zeiss).
The contrast sensitivity curves show that the Diffractiva-aA
outperforms the other MIOLs when patients are tested under
mesopic conditions and there is no loss of contrast sensitivity
when compared to its monofocal counterpart (Aspira)