4th Quarter 2002, Issue 18

Several Indiana Communities Benefit From Federal FundingSeveral proactive Indiana communities have recently been

awarded federal funding to help revitalize brownfield properties.The cities of Hammond, Evansville, South Bend, and Indianapolisare benefiting from four different federal grants for environmentalassessment and cleanup activities in blighted areas.

In April, the city of Hammond was awarded a$6.5 million grant from the U.S. Department of Hous-ing and Urban Development (HUD) to clean upcontaminated brownfield sites and makethem suitable for new businesses. Thisindustrial cleanup grant will help pay fortwo brownfield remediation projects,which are expected to lead to about900 new jobs in an area hit hard bythe recession and the downturn inthe domestic steel industry.

Approximately 500 jobs couldresult from contaminant removal ac-tivities at vacant downtown propertiesto make them suitable for future business.Another 400 jobs are predicted from cleanupand manufacturing development at the West Point Plaza In-dustrial Park, a 74-acre site that once was a dumpingground for trash, tires, construction debris, andother materials. Two businesses have beenoperating at the West Point site since 1999,with two more expected soon. Through thecleanup work, the industrial park will beexpanded to 100 acres, with federal moniesnow available to help pay for infrastructure.

Following the grant from HUD, the city ofHammond also received a $150,000 supplemental pilot grantin May from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Anadditional $50,000 in greenspace funding was awarded throughU. S. EPA’s Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilot pro-gram. The city was one of 42 communities to receive supplemen-tal grant funding to continue or expand its existing BrownfieldsProgram. More information about the city of Hammond projectmay be found at www.epa.gov/brownfields/html-doc/shammond.htm.

(continued on page 2)

The city of Hammond has taken advantage of federal and stateassistance for several other brownfield properties. In fact, the city’sprior involvement in brownfields redevelopment warranted recogni-tion by the United Nations, which recently cited the city for havinga model program.

Also in May, the city of Evansville was one of 38communities nationwide to be awarded a new

$200,000 U. S. EPA Brownfields Assessment Dem-onstration Pilot grant. The assessment pilots aredesigned to empower states, cities, towns, andcounties to work together effectively and effi-ciently to assess and encourage cleanup of

brownfield properties in order to promote their sus-tainable reuse. For additional information about the

city of Evansville, visit www.epa.gov/brownfields/html-doc/aevansvi.htm.

In July, U. S. EPA notified IDEM thatit was selected to receive two Under-

ground Storage Tank “USTfields” Pi-lot awards for the cities of South Bendand Indianapolis. Each pilot programis to receive $100,000 in grant fund-ing to address petroleum contamina-tion at federally-regulated UST sites.These federal funds, in addition to the

new state Petroleum Remediation GrantIncentive monies, will be extremely help-

ful for Indiana communities to address theirabandoned gas station sites and other sites

with leaking underground storage tanks.This federal USTfields Initiative is provided

through the U. S. EPA Office of UndergroundStorage Tanks, which is outside the U. S. EPA

Brownfields program. The intent is to parallel thesuccesses of the federal Brownfields Redevelopment Economic

Initiative. Even different federal offices understand that partneringwith brownfields initiatives results in more effective remediationand redevelopment opportunities.

For every dollar of federal money spent on brownfieldscleanup activities, states and cities reportedly produce or leverage

IDEM/Office of Land Quality Page 2 www.IN.gov/idem/land/brownfields

One of many resources available to communities looking for help withremediation plans is the Midwest Hazardous Substance Research Center(MHSRC), based at Purdue University in West Lafayette. The center facili-tates redevelopment through research and outreach. MHSRC’s research goalincorporates natural cleanup methods with complex large-scale remediationprojects. The outreach goal integrates new knowledge and technology into useby industry, communities, and government.

The center’s Technical Assistance to Brownfields (TAB) program bringstogether both of these goals by advancing involvement in communitybrownfields redevelopment efforts. For example, one of the services availablefrom the TAB program is information and presentations on cleanup options,including phytoremediation. Phytoremediation is the use of certain plants toclean up/remediate soils, sediments, and water contaminated with metals and/ororganic contaminants. (More detailed information on phytoremediation will bepresented in a future issue of this newsletter.)

Other available services to Indiana communities include:

• Training for community leaders to facilitate their involvement in thebrownfields redevelopment process.

• Training on assessing risk from environmental contaminants.• Training in assessing nature and extent of contamination at brownfield

sites.• Evaluating data from environmental sampling events.• Reviewing investigation and cleanup reports.

Two Indiana communities, Gary and Hammond, are receiving assistancethrough the TAB program.

TAB was created in 1998 as part of the U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency’s Brownfields Initiative and is funded by a U. S. EPA grant. BothMHSRC and TAB serve U. S. EPA Regions 5 and 7, which include Indiana,Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Ohio, Wisconsin, Missouri, andKansas.

The TAB program’s Region 5 Coordinator, Carol Brown, can be contacted at(765) 496-2449 or carolb@ecn.purdue.edu. For more information on the MHCRCenter or the TAB program, visit http://bridge.ecn.purdue.edu/~mhsrc/index.

Technical Resource Available toAssist Indiana Communities

Purdue Extension and TAB will be sponsoring an exhibit describing the use ofphytoremediation at brownfield sites this fall at the Indiana State Museum. Theexhibit, entitled “Turning Brownfields into Greenfields,” will run from November 1,2002 through March 2003.

Extensionand TAB exhibit

Current Activities

Reminder4November 13 -15

2002 NationalBrownfields Conference

Charlotte, North Carolinawww.brownfields2002.org

4February 2003Next Indiana

Brownfields SiteAssessment Grant

Deadline

Funding(continued from cover page)

$2.48 in private investment, turningabandoned industrial and commercialproperties into thriving economiccenters and recreational, open spaceareas. Saving greenfields (areas thathave not been previously developed) isan equally important aspect ofbrownfields redevelopment. Anestimated 4.5 acres of greenfields aresaved for every one acre ofbrownfields redeveloped.

These federal grants will spurfurther cooperation among state andlocal governments, community groups,investors, and developers to helpmaximize current brownfields redevel-opment resources. Indiana communi-ties are reaping the rewards of thesefunds and are well on their way tobecoming leaders in brownfieldsredevelopment and greenfields preser-vation.

For additional information aboutHUD, visit www.hud.gov:80/library/bookshelf07/bfields.cfm. For U. S.EPA’s Brownfields and USTfieldsInitiatives, respectively, visitwww.epa.gov/brownfields andwww.epa.gov/swerust1/ustfield/index.htm.

Brownfields Bulletin 4th Quarter 2002, Issue 18 Page 3 Contact information on back page

Through community support and public participation, andthrough resourcefulness in obtaining federal and state funding,the city of South Bend has recently realized success inbrownfields redevelopment. Private investment of $5,850,000has already occurred on brownfield sites to date, and signifi-cant additional private investment is expected in the future.

The city’s awareness of the brownfields issue began in1998 when a brownfieldsredevelopment initiativewas created to inventorybrownfields, researchvarious funding sourcesavailable to financebrownfields redevelop-ment, and act as liaisonbetween the public, pri-vate, and nonprofit sec-tors, as well as neighbor-hood residents.

In September of 1999, the U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency awarded a Brownfields Assess-ment Demonstration Pilot Grant in the amount of$200,000 to the city of South Bend for its ongoingefforts to revitalize South Bend commercial corridors.The goal was to enhance each corridor’s businessclimate, create and retain jobs, and increase the city’stax base. The grant focused on four corridors: SouthGateway, Western, Lincoln Way West, and Portage, in addi-tion to four blocks on either side of each of the corridors. U. S.EPA provided one extension to the grant, which allowed forthe completion of six Phase I and four Phase II environmen-tal site assessments (ESAs) by January of 2002.

The two-phase assessment process funded by the pilotgrant was implemented through a continuous dialogue withthe public. The city adopted a community-drivenbrownfields redevelopment approach, realizing that such anapproach would increase the project’s chance to succeed.The openness of the entire process gave the concernedcommunities an opportunity to express their vision for thefuture of their neighborhoods, as well as provide input onthe most effective ways of putting the brownfields intoproductive use.

To increase the level of public involvement in commer-cial corridors, coalitions of business leaders, residents, realestate professionals, and city officials were selected toserve on steering committees for each of the four corridors.Steering committees have played an advisory role to the cityand have had brownfields redevelopment on their agendasfor nearly three years. Some steering committee membersalso personally contacted brownfield property owners to

obtain access to the properties for the envi-ronmental assessments. This level of personalinvolvement was key to overcoming the verydifficult problem of getting property owners toparticipate in the pilot project.

The first introductory public meeting wasconducted in June 2000, to inform members ofthe public about brownfields redevelopment

opportunities. At the meeting,the city and its consultantsdescribed the project, pre-sented the scope and area ofthe proposed study, providedexamples of other successfulrevitalization projects, as wellas introduced the BusinessDistricts Action Team(BDAT). The BDAT, whichwas created to review andevaluate project proposals

from commercial corridor steering committees, is comprisedof corridor steering committee members and city represen-tatives. The forum was concluded by soliciting informationfor specific projects within represented corridors.

A second public forum, held in April 2001, was de-signed to provide a progress update to the property owners,developers, corridor steering committees, land-use subcom-mittees, and BDAT with the participation of the city’sconsultants. The participants received information on thechronology of project activities, a schedule of upcomingactivities, and findings from the Geographic InformationSystems (GIS) property evaluations.

The GIS brownfields database was incorporated intothe city’s GIS system and included all properties on the

Special thanks to Tonya Zozulya for providing theinformation for this article

(continued on page 4)

Community Initiatives

Public Input Helps Make Brownfields Redevelopmentin South Bend a Success

IDEM/Office of Land Quality Page 4 www.IN.gov/idem/land/brownfields

Recently, some changes weremade to the Indiana BrownfieldsSite Assessment Grant Programguidelines. Those changesinclude “Just In Time Funding.”Up to $50,000 is now availableannually in addition to the twogrant rounds (but as part of the$500,000 available per calendaryear) to fund site assessmentsthat would enable immediateeconomic development projectneeds. A city, town, or countymust match the grant dollars onefor one and must certify that acompany or developer is immi-nently interested. The existingBrownfields Site AssessmentGrant application form may beused to request Just in TimeFunding. Applications can bedownloaded from IDEM’sBrownfields Program Web pageunder Forms/Applications orfrom the Indiana DevelopmentFinance Authority Web page.Please contact Calvin Kelly atIDFA prior to submitting yourJust In Time Funding applicationto discuss your project.

Justin

TimeFunding

Now Available

Public Input (continued from page 3)

Q: What’s the difference between a Brownfields Comfort Letter and a BrownfieldsSite Status Letter?

A: Brownfields Comfort Letters and Brownfields Site Status Letters are valuable toolsthat can be used to address liability issues preventing brownfields transactions andredevelopment. A Brownfields Comfort Letter explains a specific liability exemption

established by statute or IDEM policy and applies the exemption to the site and letterrecipients. In this way, a Brownfields Comfort Letter may eliminate unnecessary liabil-ity concerns for a site with no liability for current or future users. In a Brownfields SiteStatus Letter, IDEM compares site conditions to objective, risk-based cleanup stan-dards. While a Brownfields Site Status Letter is not a release from liability, it may serveto minimize and qualify the exposure to risk for remaining liability at a site.

commercial corridors and adjacent blocks. Each of the 1,800 properties included inthe database was rated for redevelopment potential based on about 20 factors,including ownership, size, environmental condition, any existing structures on thesite, current use of the site, zoning, assessed value, and whether new developmentwas proposed. The database was a means to evaluate large tracts of urban land andsubsequently to identify contaminated sites, rank individual properties with respectto potential redevelopment costs, including environmental remediation and associ-ated potential benefits.

Detailed maps were presented showing rankings of properties and a tableindicating how parameter weighting and property ranking was accomplished. Aswith the first forum, the attendees were asked to provide input for specific projectswithin corridors, prioritizing them for Phase I and Phase II ESAs. Based on therecommendations of the steering committees and a series of public meetings, theBDAT developed the final list of sites to undergo Phase I and Phase II ESAs.

After the April public forum, four separate meetings were scheduled with thesteering committees to select properties and get access for completion of Phase IESAs. Throughout the project, citizens received regular corridor updates, includinginformation on steering committees and subcommittees, current projects, andscheduled public meetings. This was achieved through a newsletter published bythe city Department of Community and Economic Development.

After completion of the Phase II ESAs, the city provided the propertyowners with the final reports detailing the results of the respective Phase IIESAs, including a summary of ecological and hydrogeological investigations,potential risks, as well as recommendations about potential remediation opportu-nities and further investigations.

The city will continue to work closely with the property owners to evaluatetheir potential remediation/redevelopment funding needs and to provide information,consultation, and technical support to revitalize underutilized properties and improvethe overall quality of life, as well as the image of South Bend neighborhoods.

For more information about the public participation process in South Bend,please contact Tonya Zozulya, city of South Bend Community Development, at (574)235-5827. For more information about one of the sites included in South Bend’sprogram, the Studebaker/Oliver Project Area, see the Site Highlight on page 6.

Brownfields Bulletin 4th Quarter 2002, Issue 18 Page 5 Contact information on back page

*Site Status Letters have been developed to replace No Further Action Letters formerly issued by IDEM’s Brownfields Program.

Assessments completedor referred Grants

awarded

112 18Loansapproved

3764

Comfort andSite Status Lettersissued*

BROWNFIELDS PROGRAMBROWNFIELDS PROGRAMScoreCard

ScoreCard

Vinyl chloride (VC) is acolorless, flammable, organic gas witha mild, sweet odor. It can be smelledonly at very high levels. VC is used inthe manufacture of a variety ofproducts (see below), but it alsoresults from the breakdown of othersubstances such as trichloroethane(TCA), trichloroethylene (TCE), andtetrachloroethylene (PCE), typicallyused in drycleaning. Liquid VCevaporates easily into the air and canalso evaporate from soil or water ifnear the surface. It can also breakdown within a few days into otherharmful substances.

Synonyms and trade names forvinyl chloride include: chlorethene,chlorethylene, chloroethene,chloroethylene, monochlorethene,monochloroethylene, ethylenemonochloride, monovinyl chloride(MVC), Vinyl Chloride Monomer,Trovidur, VC, and VCM.

Vinyl chloride has been found inat least 496 of the 1,430 NationalPriorities List sites identified by theU.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency (U. S. EPA).

Vinyl Chloride (C2H

3Cl)

This article attempts to give only basic information due to limited space. Please consult the appropriateagencies and Web sites or a qualified specialist for more specific/comprehensive information.

EPA Maximum Contaminant Level: 0.002ppm (milligrams/liter) in drinking water

EPA Reporting Requirements: spills or acci-dental releases of 1 pound or more must bereported to the EPA

IDEM RISC Guidance Levels: default closurelevel residential and indusrial soil (0.013ppm), default closure level residential andindustrial groundwater (0.002)

OSHA: Maximum allowable level of VC inworkroom air during 8-hour workday in a 40-hour week is 1 ppm

Regulatory Levels/Requirements

Possible Means ofExposure to VC

• Breathing vinyl chloride that has been re-leased from plastics industries, hazardouswaste sites, and landfills.

• Breathing vinyl chloride in air or during con-tact with your skin or eyes in the workplace.

• Drinking water from contaminated wells.

• Breathing vinyl chloride in air or in contactwith skin while bathing in water from contami-nated well.

ProductsContaining VC

Vinyl chloride is a manufactured substance thatis used in the manufacture of polyvinyl chloride(PVC), which is used to make a variety of plas-tic products including:

• Pipes

•Wire and cable coatings

•Furniture and automobile upholstery

Short-term human health effects: breathingvapors for short periods of time can causedizziness, sleepiness, unconsciousness, andat extremely high levels can cause death;direct skin contact will cause numbness, red-ness, and blisters.

Known long-term human health effects:known carcinogen; breathing vapors for longperiods of time can result in permanent liverdamage, immune reactions, nerve damage,and liver cancer. Other symptoms includeblood flow problems in hands, finger tipsturning white and painful when exposed tocold, and in some cases bone erosion offinger tips.

Potential human health effects: The effects ofingesting high levels of VC are unknown.

Animal testing results: Long-term exposure inanimals has shown that breathing VC candamage male reproductive systems, can harmunborn offspring, and may also cause increasesin early miscarriages.

Health Effects

For sources and further informaton,contact: www.epa.gov/safewater/dwh/c-voc/vinylchl.html orwww.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts20.html.

IDEM/Office of Land Quality Page 6 www.IN.gov/idem/land/brownfields

Site Highlight

Special thanks to Ann Kolata forproviding the information for thisarticle

Since the December 1963 closingof the Studebaker Corporation, the cityof South Bend has struggled with thechallenge of redeveloping its historicindustrial core into a productive, eco-nomically viable, and physically attrac-tive part of the community. What oncewas a regional asset has become onecommunity’s liability. Since the mid-1970s, there has been a slow erosion ofthe businesses, jobs, and tax base in thearea as companies have left the deterio-rated and obsolete manufacturing and

warehousing space. This trend is bestshown by the area’s employmentstatistics. In 1950, there were 21,525employees working in the factories ofthe Studebaker/Oliver Project Area,while in 2002 there are fewer than 75.

From the mid-1970s to the early1990s, the city initiated several plan-ning efforts based on a balancedstrategy of the adaptive reuse ofselected facilities, coupled with limitedclearance and site assemblage. In1990, the city issued a general obliga-tion bond for $4,900,000 to funddemolition of two former Studebakerbuildings (a total of 810,000 squarefeet). The bond funds were also usedto purchase and clear 13 blocks ofsurrounding blighted residential andcommercial property. Most recently,the city purchased two formerStudebaker Buildings (a total of430,000 square feet) and demolishedthose buildings to make way for a newSt. Joseph County Jail and PublicWorks Service Center.

In the late 1990s, it was clear that

more drastic action was required, soMayor Stephen J. Luecke appointed a25-member steering committee towork with city staff and a consultingfirm to take a fresh look at past plans,the current situation, and economic,environmental and market trends. Thecharge to the committee was todevelop a vision, strategy, and actionplan that included immediate actionswithin a comprehensive and long-rangeframework.

After eight months of work, thecommittee unveiled the “Studebaker/Oliver Redevelopment Strategy”outlining a broad, long-term strategyand immediate action steps. Sincecompletion in 1999, the city of SouthBend has taken several steps toimplement the strategy. These activi-ties have included Phase I and PhaseII Environmental Site Assessmentsand securing more than $6 million infunding for the Studebaker/OliverRedevelopment project. Working inpartnership with state and federalgovernment, South Bend has accom-plished much, although most of it hasbeen behind the scenes and not visibleto the general public.

Progress has become moreapparent since demolition recentlybegan on the former Oliver buildings.The Oliver site, located near theStudebaker properties, was left vacantin 1984 when manufacturing opera-tions ceased on the site. The SouthBend Redevelopment Commissionacquired title to the Oliver property aspart of a former owner’s bankruptcyreorganization. The South BendRedevelopment Commission alsoacquired the former Studebakerstamping plant as part of the sametransaction. These two propertiescontain more than 2.5 million squarefeet in approximately 40 buildings and

(continued on page 7)

(Inset photo) Former Oliver site lies idle. (Main photo) Studebaker Building 82 was the final assembly andshipping building for new cars. Redevelopment plans for this area call for demolition of all major structuresand the creation of a new light industrial park.

Studebaker/Oliver Redevelopment Project: RevitalizingSouth Bend’s Historic Industrial Core

Brownfields Bulletin 4th Quarter 2002, Issue 18 Page 7 Contact information on back page

Studebaker (continued from page 6)

U.S. EPABrownfieldsList Server

The International City/County Management Association (ICMA) BrownfieldsPeer Exchange program pairs experienced “mentor” communities with “protégé”communities that have requested assistance with specific aspects of brownfieldscleanup and redevelopment. Two of the four peer exchanges in 2001 were in Indi-ana (as highlighted in the Brownfields Bulletin 4th Quarter, Issue 14 – “Two Indi-ana Communities Chosen to Participate in ICMA Peer Exchange Program”).

Camden, New Jersey, was matched as mentor to Gary, Indiana, to discusscommunity outreach, environmental justice, and job training. Indianapolis, Indiana,was matched as a mentor to Concord, North Carolina, to discuss engaging thecommunity and private sector in the brownfields redevelopment process, redevel-oping brownfields as greenspace, and integrating brownfields into a city’s overallplanning and development strategy.

Under the Peer Exchange program, ICMA conducts research on obstaclesfacing communities in redeveloping brownfields, identifies successful strategiesand methods that communities have employed in overcoming those obstacles, andoffers brownfields practitioners an opportunity to share their experiences with peers.

The report, Partners in Planning: Strategies from the 2001 BrownfieldsPeer Exchange, documents the topics addressed between mentor and protégécommunities, and details ideas shared on how to address those topics. The reportcan be viewed on-line at www.icma.org/issueintersections/brownfields.cfm.

are located on more than 75 acres.There is enough space to fill 80 cityblocks with houses or the equivalent of1200 typical two-story houses. Thecity has signed a VoluntaryRemediation Agreement with IDEM’sVoluntary Remediation Program(VRP) for the Oliver site and expectsto submit a VRP application for aportion of the Studebaker site in thenear future.

The Studebaker/Oliver redevelop-ment project is an ambitious one -anticipated to take 10 to 15 years and $13to $33 million to complete. It is signifi-cantly larger than any project in thecommunity and is the largest brownfieldproject in Indiana to date. In total, the cityof South Bend will have purchased anddemolished more than 3.7 million squarefeet of former Studebaker and Oliverbuildings in addition to the 1,240,000square feet already demolished.

In Brief

Types of financing utilized orobtained for the project:

· South Bend RedevelopmentCommission General ObligationBond

· Tax Increment Financing

· EDIT Funds

· South Bend CIP Funds

· Section 108 Loan

· Brownfield Economic Develop-ment Initiative Grant - HUD

· Neighborhood Initiative ProgramGrant – HUD

· Economic Development InitiativeGrant – HUD

· Brownfield Urban EnterpriseZone Grant –Indiana Department of Commerce

· Brownfields Site Assessment Grant– Indiana Development FinanceAuthority

South Bend will continue to fosterits current and future partnerships withthe state of Indiana (IDEM, IndianaDevelopment Finance Authority, andIndiana Department of Commerce)and the federal government (Depart-ment of Housing and Urban Develop-ment and U. S. EPA). Additional fundingmust be secured to complete theproject. When this project is complete,South Bend will realize the benefit ofreturning more than 120 acres ofindustrial land to productive use,increasing the tax base, and bringingnew jobs and private investment intothe area.

For more information about theStudebaker/Oliver redevelopmentproject, please contact Ann Kolata,Senior Redevelopment Specialist,with the city of South Bend at (574)235-9374 or akolata@ci.south-bend.in.us.

ICMA Releases Brownfields Peer Exchange Report

The U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency’s Office ofSolid Waste and EmergencyResponse recentlyimplemented a Brownfields ListServer capability. By adding yourname to this list server, you willreceive periodic announcementsand press releases related to theU. S. EPA BrownfieldsInitiative. To subscribe to the U. S.EPA Brownfields List Server, goto www.epa.gov/swerosps/bf/listserv.htm.

4th Quarter2002, Issue 18

Brownfields Bulletin is published quarterly by the Indiana De-

partment of Environmental Management to inform local

government officials, business representatives, and interest groups

about brownfields redevelopment initiatives and success stories from

within and beyond the state. A brownfield site is an industrial or

commercial property that is abandoned, inactive or underutilized due

to actual or perceived environmental contamination. IDEM’s over-

all mission is to make Indiana a cleaner, healthier place to live.

IDEM’s brownfields initiative helps communities remove barriers

for sustainable growth.

Please contact Dan Chesterson of the IDEM Brownfields Program to

inform IDEM of address changes, to be added or deleted from the

mailing list or e-mail list serve, or to share your comments and

ideas about this publication.

Brownfields Program StaffGabriele Hauer ghauer@dem.state.in.usSection Chief (317) 233-2773

Michele Oertel moertel@dem.state.in.usSenior Environmental Manager (317) 234-0235

Dan Chesterson dchester@dem.state.in.usEnvironmental Manager (317) 232-4402

Tracy Concannon tconcann@dem.state.in.us

Environmental Manager (317) 233-2801

Susan Tynes stynes@dem.state.in.usEnvironmental Scientist (317) 233-1504

Trevor Fuller tfuller@dem.state.in.us

Environmental Scientist (317) 233-8409

Sandy Bardes sbardes@dem.state.in.usSecretary (317) 233-2570

Thomas W. Baker twbaker@dem.state.in.usAttorney (317) 233-1207

IDEM’s toll-free number: (800) 451-6027, press 0 and ask for a person by name or number, or dial direct.

Who Can HelpTechnical and educational assistance

Indiana Department ofEnvironmental ManagementBrownfields Program Staff (listed top right)100 N. Senate Ave., Suite 1101P.O. Box 6015Indianapolis, IN 46206-6015www.IN.gov/idem/land/brownfields

Indiana Department of CommerceDeanna Jeffrion, Enterprise Zone Program ManagerOne North Capitol, Suite 600Indianapolis, IN 46204(317) 232-8917e-mail: djeffrion@commerce.state.in.uswww.indbiz.com

Financial assistanceIndiana Development Finance AuthorityCalvin Kelly, Deputy DirectorOne North Capitol, Suite 900Indianapolis, IN 46204(317) 233-4332e-mail: ckelly@idfa.state.in.uswww.IN.gov/idfa

Printed on recycled paper, 100% post-consumer content.

Indiana Department of Environmental ManagementOffice of Land QualityBrownfields ProgramP.O. Box 6015Indianapolis, IN 46206-6015

50-03-3