Session 25 Case Study – Residential System, Part 2 Operation and Analysis December 01, 2015.
-
Upload
loren-hensley -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Session 25 Case Study – Residential System, Part 2 Operation and Analysis December 01, 2015.
Session 25
Case Study – Residential System, Part 2
Operation and Analysis
December 01, 2015
Session 25 - Value to class members
• Additional evaluation and analysis of a residential grid-tied PV systemso Operationo Life Cycle Costingo Payback Analysis
2
Grid-Tied PV Systems – The Design Process
Design Steps in a Residential Scale System
1. Examination of site and estimation of performance
2. Securing financing3. Carrying out PV system
engineering and design4. Securing relevant permits5. Construction6. Inspection7. Connection to the grid8. Performance monitoring
3
Grid-Tied PV Systems – The Design Process
Step 5 – Construction
Step 6 – Inspection
Step 7 – Connection to the grid
Step 8 – Performance monitoring
4
Comparison of Two Residential PV Systems
5kW system
installed in 2010
• Roof mounted• 22 Siliken 225W poly modules• Sunny Boy 4kW inverter
• No remote monitoring
• Installed cost: $28,979• $5.85/W (dc)
• Incentives:• Utility co. rebate: $13,365• Federal ITC: $8,694• State Solar Incentive: $1,000
• Total OOP Cost: $5,920• $1.20/W (dc)
3.5kW system
to be installed in 2014
• Elevated structure• 14 Canadian 250W poly modules• 14 Enphase micro-inverters
o Enphase monitoring solution
• Installed cost: $13,450o $3.84/W (dc)
• Incentives:• Installer rebate: $1,000• Federal ITC: $4,035• State Solar Incentive: $1,000
• Total OOP Cost: $7,415• $2.12/W (dc)
5
Step 8 – Performance monitoring
6
on-peak - 14.4c/kWh; off-peak – 2.3c/kWh; average – 8c/kWhAll electricity costs – 12.3c/kWh
Step 8 – Performance monitoring
7
Economic Analysis
Current residential PV system example
• Assume that the installed cost of a 3.5kW PV system is $2.12/W after all incentives are accounted for. Assume that the system will produce an annual electrical amount of 6250 kWh (as measured). Assume the utility cost of electricity as $0.123/kWh.
• The plan here is to calculate the Life Cycle Cost (the numerator of the LCOE equation) on both an annualized and cumulative basis, and see when it crosses zero
Current residential PV system example• A spreadsheet was used to analyze this
situation; plotting the results yields (for annual return)
Current residential
• Plotting the cumulative return for 25 years
Payback – 8.5 years
Net Metering
11
• At the end of each month, a utility bill is calculated:
• Generation = N(kWh from utility) – N(kWh to utility) – N(some credits from previous month)
• This is all at the retail rate
Net Metering
12
• Once a year, the residual credits are cashed in
• This is all at the wholesale rate• For APS solar customers, the “settle-up” date is
12/31• For SRP solar customers, the date is 04/30• This is a critical difference
Step 8 – Performance monitoring
13
APS Net Metering
Step 8 – Performance monitoring
14
APS Net Metering – Generation Bill
Avoided Electricity Cost = 0.123$/kWh * 5225kWh= $643
Step 8 – Performance monitoring
15
SRP Net Metering
Avoided Electricity Cost = $643 - $130 = $513
Revised Economic Analysis
Revised current residential PV system examples
• Assume that the installed cost of a 3.5kW PV system is $2.12/W after incentives, or $7415. Assume that the system will produce a net electricity reduction amount through net metering of 5225 kWh (APS calculation), or 4168 kWh (SRP calculation). Assume the utility cost of electricity is $0.123/kWh and does not increase over the lifespan of the PV system.
• The plan here is to calculate the Life Cycle Cost (the numerator of the LCOE equation) on both an annualized and cumulative basis, and see when it crosses zero
Revised current residential
Payback –> 10.5 – 13.5 years