Session 2: Research Impact – an end-user’s perspective: Genome-Informed Diagnostics

5
biosecurity built on science Research Impact – an end- user’s perspective: Genome-Informed Diagnostics Barbara Hall (SARDI) Chair - Subcommittee of Plant Health Diagnostics (SPHD)

Transcript of Session 2: Research Impact – an end-user’s perspective: Genome-Informed Diagnostics

Page 1: Session 2: Research Impact – an end-user’s  perspective: Genome-Informed Diagnostics

biosecurity built on science

Research Impact – an end-user’s perspective: Genome-Informed

Diagnostics

Barbara Hall (SARDI)Chair - Subcommittee of Plant Health Diagnostics

(SPHD)

Page 2: Session 2: Research Impact – an end-user’s  perspective: Genome-Informed Diagnostics

biosecurity built on science

Intergovernmental Agreement on Biosecurity

National Plant Biosecurity Strategy

National Plant Biosecurity Surveillance

Strategy

National Plant Biosecurity Diagnostics

Strategy

National Agreements and Strategies- Relevant to SPHD

Subcommittee for National Plant

Health Surveillance (SNPHS)

Subcommittee for Plant Health Diagnostics

(SPHD)

Plant Health Committee (PHC)

Page 3: Session 2: Research Impact – an end-user’s  perspective: Genome-Informed Diagnostics

biosecurity built on science

Subcommittee for Plant Health Diagnostics (SPHD)

• Facilitate the development of a diagnostic capability and capacity for all High Priority Pests

• Develop and recommend national standard processes relating to plant pest diagnostics

• Promote and facilitate the development of National Diagnostic Protocols (NDPs) for EPPs and endemic pests of national significance

• The National Plant Biosecurity Network (NBPDN) (http://plantbiosecuritydiagnostics.net.au/)- SPHD Reference Standard No. 2: “Development of Diagnostic Protocols Instructions to Authors”

• PHC recommended closer links between SPHD and SNPHS

Page 4: Session 2: Research Impact – an end-user’s  perspective: Genome-Informed Diagnostics

biosecurity built on science

Research Impact – an end user’s perspective:

• 4 (plus!!!) National Diagnostic Protocols

• Science Capability• 9 scientists (post docs and PhD aligned with PBCRC2156)• Re-established Plant Bacteriology capability in Australia

• Peer reviewed science• The diagnostic pipeline• Diagnostic tools are/will be published • In country validation (surveys)

• Smart Surveillance Tools • LAMP vs RPA vs ????• SNPHS

Page 5: Session 2: Research Impact – an end-user’s  perspective: Genome-Informed Diagnostics

biosecurity built on science