Session 127 Panel Discussion: USA vs. World – … · Michelle M. Haines, ASA, MAAA . Stephen...
Transcript of Session 127 Panel Discussion: USA vs. World – … · Michelle M. Haines, ASA, MAAA . Stephen...
Session 127PD, USA Vs World – Supplemental Health Products
Presenters: Michelle M. Haines, ASA, MAAA
Stephen Rook, FSA, MAAA Anil Sanwal
SOA Antitrust Disclaimer SOA Presentation Disclaimer
2018 SOA Health MeetingPresenters
STEPHEN ROOK, FSA, Vice President, Aflac Group Insurance
ANIL SANWAL, Vice President, RGA International Corporation
MICHELLE HAINES, ASA, Associate Actuary, RGA US Group Reinsurance
Session Coordinator
KAMRAN MALIK, ASA, Consulting Actuary, Wakely Actuarial
Session 127, USA vs World – Supplemental Health Products
June 27, 2018
SOCIETY OF ACTUARIESAntitrust Compliance Guidelines
Active participation in the Society of Actuaries is an important aspect of membership. While the positive contributions of professional societies and associations are well-recognized and encouraged, association activities are vulnerable to close antitrust scrutiny. By their very nature, associations bring together industry competitors and other market participants.
The United States antitrust laws aim to protect consumers by preserving the free economy and prohibiting anti-competitive business practices; they promote competition. There are both state and federal antitrust laws, although state antitrust laws closely follow federal law. The Sherman Act, is the primary U.S. antitrust law pertaining to association activities. The Sherman Act prohibits every contract, combination or conspiracy that places an unreasonable restraint on trade. There are, however, some activities that are illegal under all circumstances, such as price fixing, market allocation and collusive bidding.
There is no safe harbor under the antitrust law for professional association activities. Therefore, association meeting participants should refrain from discussing any activity that could potentially be construed as having an anti-competitive effect. Discussions relating to product or service pricing, market allocations, membership restrictions, product standardization or other conditions on trade could arguably be perceived as a restraint on trade and may expose the SOA and its members to antitrust enforcement procedures.
While participating in all SOA in person meetings, webinars, teleconferences or side discussions, you should avoid discussing competitively sensitive information with competitors and follow these guidelines:
• Do not discuss prices for services or products or anything else that might affect prices
• Do not discuss what you or other entities plan to do in a particular geographic or product markets or with particular customers.
• Do not speak on behalf of the SOA or any of its committees unless specifically authorized to do so.
• Do leave a meeting where any anticompetitive pricing or market allocation discussion occurs.
• Do alert SOA staff and/or legal counsel to any concerning discussions
• Do consult with legal counsel before raising any matter or making a statement that may involve competitively sensitive information.
Adherence to these guidelines involves not only avoidance of antitrust violations, but avoidance of behavior which might be so construed. These guidelines only provide an overview of prohibited activities. SOA legal counsel reviews meeting agenda and materials as deemed appropriate and any discussion that departs from the formal agenda should be scrutinized carefully. Antitrust compliance is everyone’s responsibility; however, please seek legal counsel if you have any questions or concerns.
2
Presentation Disclaimer
Presentations are intended for educational purposes only and do not replace independent professional judgment. Statements of fact and opinions expressed are those of the participants individually and, unless expressly stated to the contrary, are not the opinion or position of the Society of Actuaries, its cosponsors or its committees. The Society of Actuaries does not endorse or approve, and assumes no responsibility for, the content, accuracy or completeness of the information presented. Attendees should note that the sessions are audio-recorded and may be published in various media, including print, audio and video formats without further notice.
3
To Participate, look for Polls in the SOA Event App or visit health.cnf.io in your browser
4
Type health.cnf.io In Your Browser
or
Find The Polls Feature Under MoreIn The Event App
Choose your
session
Supplemental Health Products
•Supplemental Health = in addition to other coverage
•Session Focus•Critical Illness, Accident, Hospital Indemnity
• Group chassis, optionally renewable• Sold at the workplace
6
1
18%
55%
27%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Very familiar - this is what I do! Somewhat familiar - I know the basics. Not familiar - this is new to me!
How familiar are you with Supplemental Health products in the U.S.?
Critical Illness – U.S.
8
Core Covered Conditions
• Invasive Cancer• Minor Cancer• Heart Attack• Stroke• Major Organ Failure• Coronary Artery Disease• and more…
Accident – U.S.
9
Benefits
• Emergency Room• Hospital Stay• Office Visits• Specific Injuries• Treatments/Surgeries• AD&D• and more…
Hospital Indemnity – U.S.
10
Benefits
Standard (HSA Compatible)• Hospital Admission• Hospital ConfinementExtras• Emergency Room• Office Visits• Treatments/Surgeries• and more…
2017 U.S. Workplace Sales
11
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
Premium (millions)
Critical Illness Accident Hospital Indemnity
Source: LIMRAU.S. Workplace Supplemental Health Insurance2017 Fourth Quarter Review
18%
9%1%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
% Change from 2016
Critical Illness Accident Hospital Indemnity
CI Inforce Premium & Growth – Canada, India, UK
12
Country Inforce Premium (millions)
AnnualGrowth
Canada ~CAD 300 (USD 230) 10-15%1
India ~INR 750 (USD 10) 7-10%2
UK ~£ 85 (USD 110) 10-15%3
South Africa small but growing
1 Fraser Group2 IRDA3 Swiss Re Group Watch
Marketing
USA vs World
• Gap Filler
• Network Expansion
• Unexpected Costs
• Gap Filler
• Mortgage Protection
• Complement to LTD
14
Distribution
USA vs World
• Employer Groups
• Associations and Affinity Groups
• Employer Groups in Canada, Potential in Other Markets
• Associations and Affinity Groups
• Bank Distribution
15
Market Penetration
USA vs World1Product Ownership:• Accident: 16%• Critical Illness: 7%• Hospital Indemnity: 7%
CI as % of Total Group Premium• UK: 5%• Canada: 8-10%• India: <5%• South Africa: <5%
16
1Eastbridge Consulting, Delving Deeper into Employee Demographics (March 2018)
Critical Illness Covered Conditions
USA vs World
• Long list of conditions
• Partial benefits for less “critical” conditions
• Childhood illnesses
• Long list of conditions
• Staged CI
• Juvenile CI
18
2
30%
60%
0% 0%
10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
More than 5 More than 10 More than 15 More than 20 Other
How many conditions is too many?
Promoting the Value of CI Coverage
USA – LIMRA Survey of 2,000+ Employees in Dec 2017• 1 in 4 understand CI pays a lump sum that can be used for anything
upon diagnosis of a covered condition
• 7% of employees can accurately identify the conditions most likely to be covered
• Most employees underestimate the likelihood of a cancer diagnosis or heart attack
21
https://www.limra.com/Research/Abstracts_Public/2018/Employee_Understanding_of_Benefits_and_Risk.aspx?div=AllResearch
Promoting the Value of CI Coverage
vs World – RGA Canada CI Focus Group
General:• 75% did not have a health concern• 65% would have no problem handling the extra expense
Those who purchased CI:• Upon recommendation of an advisor & made sense based on their age• 3-5 covered conditions was adequate
Those who did not purchase CI:• Felt already covered through existing insurance• No clear consensus on amount of CI that was appropriate
22
Critical Illness Plan Design Features
USA vs World
• Spouse and Child Coverage
• No Survival Period
• Multi-pay• Recurrence
• Survival Period but reducing (14-30 days)
• Recurrence• Partial payments
• Administration• Customer Confusion
23
Critical Illness Plan Design Features
USA vs World
• Age-Banded Rates• Issue Age vs Attained Age• Requests for Composite Rates
• Portable• Interaction and
Complementarity with Short Term Medical
• Portable• Fit with Medical and LTD
24
3
60%
30%
10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Yes No I don't know
Do you see Short Term Medical + CI as a promising option in its price competitiveness?
4
70%
0%
30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Yes No I don't know
Do you see STD/LTD and CI as a good complementary fit?
Critical Illness Underwriting
USA vs World
• Actively at Work• Primarily Guaranteed Issue• Pre-ex• Participation Requirements• Open Enrollments• Industry
• FCL Approach• Response to Low (Minimum)
Participation• Primarily Simplified Issue
• Selective use of Pre-ex• Move away from
Participation Requirements
27
RGA 2017 U.S. Group CI Underwriting Survey
29
Snapshot of Trends• Liberalization of Plan Designs
• No lifetime maximum• Higher spouse benefits• Increase in recurrence benefit levels
• Liberalization of Underwriting Practices• More requests to remove pre-ex• ‘Perpetual’ GI• Longer rate guarantees
Recurrence Benefits on the Rise
Source: RGA 2017 U.S. Group CI Underwriting SurveyQuestion not asked on 2015 survey
Rate Guarantees
2 years remains standard – but carriers will offer 3 years when needed
Source: RGA 2017 U.S. Group CI Underwriting Survey
Critical Illness Emerging Trends
USA vs World
• Testing and stage at diagnosis• CancerSEEK• Genome sequencing
• Continued lack of consumer awareness
• Growth in markets with nationalized healthcare
• Growth in workplace distribution
• Rise in covered conditions• Continued lack of
consumer awareness
34
Accident Benefits
USA
• Indemnity or Expense Incurred
• Include Accidental Death or not
• Treatment provided within stated timeline
• Diagnosis requirements
37
Accident Plan Design Features
USA
• Spouse and Child Coverage
• Portable
• Price Point Sensitivity
38
Accident Underwriting
USA
• Actively at Work
• Guaranteed Issue
• Participation Requirements
• Open Enrollments
• Industry
39
RGA 2017 U.S. Voluntary/Worksite Accident Survey
Top Concerns When Underwriting Accident Insurance
40
Participation Pricing
Industry Competition
Hospital Indemnity Benefits
USA
• Hospital Admission• How much is too much?• Optimal ratio of Hospital Admission to Daily Hospital Confinement?
• HSA Compatible Benefits• Hospital Admission, Daily Hospital, Accident
43
Hospital Indemnity Plan Design Features
USA
• Spouse and Child Coverage
• Portable
• Benefit Considerations• Maternity, Substance Abuse, Mental Nervous Disorders
44
Hospital Indemnity Underwriting
USA
• Actively at Work• Push toward Guaranteed Issue• Pre-ex• Participation Requirements• Open Enrollments• Industry
45
Regulation
USA vs World
• 50 State Filing• State Variations• Excepted Benefit• HSA Compatibility• Minimum Loss Ratio
Requirements
• Standard Definitions- UK & Canada
47
General Trends
USA vs World
• Combination Products• One product filing or product
bundling
• Growth in Employer Paid• Longer Rate Guarantees• Gig Economy• Innovating for Persistency
• Growth in Employee Paid
49