SESSION 1 - ETSI › Workshop › 2012 › 201210_M2M... · Operators need to consider the user...

SESSION 1

Setting the Scene

Presented by David Boswarthick of ETSI

Standardized framework for interoperable M2M Services. 24th – 25th October 2012

© ETSI 2012. All rights reserved

Highlights from the presentations (1 of 4)

Enrico Scarrone of Telecom Italia gave an overview of how

standards will enable the global M2M solution.

He kindly likened ETSI to the wizard of M2M standardization and

provided an introduction of how TC M2M have adopted an open

approach to standardization and encouraged cooperation with other approach to standardization and encouraged cooperation with other

bodies such as BBF, OMA , HGI and the SDOs.

He summarised that timely and global standardization is a key enabler

to remove the technical barriers and ensure interoperable M2M

services and networks

He also provided an overview of the work we are doing in ETSI M2M

and touched upon the plan for transfer and evolution towards

oneM2M.

2 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved


Joachim Koss of Cinterion presented the new oneM2M

Partnership Project which sees 7 SDOs from Asia, EU, and North

America coming together to produce globally applicable,

access-independent M2M service layer specifications.

It is hoped the work of oneM2M will:-It is hoped the work of oneM2M will:-

• Boost M2M economies of scale by shortening time-to-market,

• Simplify development of applications,

• Leverage the worldwide network for enhanced potential of services and

to expand business opportunities,

• Reduce standardization overlap by provide ongoing standards support,

• Increase the ability of solutions and produces to interoperate.



Katharina & Katja of Swisscom explained how M2M business

models should be build in a customer centric manner.

“In IoT the value proposition is not primarily about physical products and

not even about services, it‘s mostly about experiences and feelings”.

They also provided insight from the EU-Project

M2M business should be optimized through the use of

partnerships as no one company is big enough to go it alone.

Also deployment costs may be reduced through the use of

open standards allowing for interoperable and future proof

solutions from multiple vendors and working with different

partners.



Milan Zoric of ETSI CTI provide an overview of the 13 live

demos involving 28 companies that have been on display

throughout the workshop.

(See later slides)


Possible way forward

Encourage standardisation effort in oneM2M in order to avoid

overlap and standards fragmentation

Encourage liaison between standards groups to ensure

harmonised collection and definition of use cases for M2M.

Operators need to consider the user when defining services Operators need to consider the user when defining services

with a user centric approach,

Encouraging user and consumers to provide feedback on early

deployment of M2M services.

Proactive marketing of the M2M services to the end user to

encourage positive reception and take-up.

Improved cooperation between R&D projects and

Standardization is needed.


M2M INTEROPERABILITY DEMONSTRATIONS

Wrap up session

Presented by Milan Zoric for M2M Workshop, Mandelieu, October 2012

This year the event has attracted

13 comprehensive interoperability demos

involving 28 companies

8 M2M Workshop © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved

Main message from

interoperability demonstrations

Demos attracted many of the Workshop

participants, very positive feedback

Both visitors and presenters were highly

pleased with the questions & interactions

Several examples of new implementations Several examples of new implementations

of the ETSI M2M architecture

Implementations are approaching Release

1 to somewhere towards Release 2

New examples from various vertical

domains

Some talk of interconnect trails and testing

around the demos


Future evolution

Looking forward to having an even bigger set

of demos in the next M2M related event(s)

next year

Looking forward to further Interoperability

testing eventstesting events

• Second IoT CoAP Plugtests, 28th -30th November 2012

in Sophia Antipolis, France, with additional test cases

including basic ETSI M2M CoAP binding tests

• Other M2M related events ?

Consultations and discussions on M2M

testing issues will proceed in ETSI M2M and

oneM2M


SESSION 2

The ETSI M2M STANDARD

Presented by Patricia MARTIGNE



ETSI M2M architecture introduction• Some clues to understand ETSI M2M Rel 1

• Main features for Release 2: Interworking with 3GPP; M2M Information Recording; Charging architecture; Few enhancements like the communication channel used for arbitrary requests to a Gateway behind a NAT

M2M Security standards: ETSI contributions

Highlights from the presentations

M2M Security standards: ETSI contributions• Security Thread analysis reports provided by ETSI TCs

• What Security variants are specified by ETSI M2M

Next steps for M2M standards: Abstraction & semantics• Needs for abstraction and semantics as enablers for the M2M market to move from

siloed environment to convergent services

• Industry expects SDOs to provide standardized solutions (e.g. French AGORA of home networking)

• SDOs are aiming to harmonize with each other (e.g. BBF, ETSI M2M, HGI, OSGI, OMA..)

• oneM2M, claiming end-to-end aspects of standardization, could play a coordinating role, while explicitly keeping out of the specifics of individual industry segments.

Security raises the question of liability in case of a failure in

delivering the expected service; these concerns are discussed

for example at European Commissions experts group for

Smart Grid.

Distinction between Abstraction and semantics needs to be

Issues raised & Questions

Distinction between Abstraction and semantics needs to be

described so that all SDOs understand their roles on each of

both items

How the M2M platform will have to support Semantics

For semantics we can learn a lot from Semantic Web; to see

how to adapt it to M2M…

Maturity of ETSI M2M Release 1,

• can be easily implemented (implementations showed in the Demo-Room)

• next steps include

• Finalization of Release2 for additional major features

• Proposal to begin the work on a conformance specification to allow checking the

conformance of the products implementing ETSI M2M specification

Semantics is a key piece needed that is missing in the current Release


Semantics is a key piece needed that is missing in the current Release

• To go beyond the current ETSI M2M work item on a semantics Technical

Report

• By drafting a Technical Specification that will be transfered to OneM2M when

appropriate (depending on next bullet action adoption)

• To have a WG dedicated to Abstraction/Semantics in OneM2M that will take

care of the continuation of this work

• Immediate step: Creation of a mailing list for exhanging ideas about the main

concepts we want to seal with under this fascinating and federating

Abstraction/Semantics subject

SESSION 3

Implementing ETSI M2M

Presented by Omar Elloumi




Standards developments are

converging nicely together:

• CoAP, 6lowpan, ETSI M2M, OMA DM, BBF

TR069, OSGi, etc. and the ZigBee, KNX,

etc.

ETSI M2M framework provides a solid ETSI M2M framework provides a solid

foundation to Smart home and Smart

Grid requirements:

• network agnostic, synch/asynch comms.,

subscribe/notify, REST API, security, etc.



Technology wise: we have all we need to address most (if not

all) M2M markets

But:

• We still have a long way to go to convince about the value proposition

(tutorials; best practices; reference implementation; etc)(tutorials; best practices; reference implementation; etc)

• Improve interoperability

• Fill-in the remaining gaps: Abstraction and Semantics

• Need to make application development easier and simpler for

application developer who shall not know about ETSI M2M

For further discussion:

• SDK vs. “plain REST API”

• Role of gateway

• Role of the M2M platform vs. Applications in abstraction/semantics



ETSI M2MoneM2M

INTEROPERABILITY

Approach TBDReference implementation

EDUCATION AND PROMOTION


oneM2MOMABBF

IPSO/IETF(not exhaustive)

STANDARDS / TECHNOLOGY NEXT STEPS

Keep the API simple! Application developers do not need to know about ETSIAbstraction and SemanticsFurther study/clarify the role of the gateway

Tutorials, Best practices, Implementation guidelinesReal world tangible examples, Better use case documents

SESSION 4

On INDUSTRY SECTORS

Presented by Joachim Koss




SMCG Report on Use Cases handover to EC in December

European approach for defining security requirements based

on Use Cases

• Risk analysis per Use Case

• Defining security levels and requirements per data asset per zone• Defining security levels and requirements per data asset per zone

Define a European reference set of P&S Requirements for

Smart Metering and a certification approach

Increasing need for M2M Security / Privacy in more and more

M2M segments (e.g. Smart Energy, Governmental IT,

Telematic / Health, Car industry)

Critical infrastructure protection e.g. Smart Grid



Key to unlocking the potential lies in scalable, interoperable,

secure solutions which enable robust evolvement of the

Smart Grid

Road traffic assistance based on 3GPP cellular technology and

cloudified services raise special challenges: real time aspects, cloudified services raise special challenges: real time aspects,

system performance and scalability

Scalibility also in sense of adding new applications in the

traffic system, saving costs by

• reuseing infrastructure and

• simplifying SW engineering



SM/SG: security level of general ICT COTS certified products

needs to be raised, therefore the level of standardization has

to be increased by building Technical Communities (TC)

developing collaborative Protection Profiles (“cPPs”)

Q: Which SDO to support the initiative?Q: Which SDO to support the initiative?

Horizontal approaches in standardization:

Every link in the chain must be secure from physical device to

backend server (end-to-end)



Evalution of opportunities for co-operation between ESMIG

Technical Community (TC) initiative, and ETSI/oneM2M on

Security Certification involving certification bodies and

governments

Support complex queries in traffic system as traffic jam Support complex queries in traffic system as traffic jam

detection


SESSION 5

On M2M TECHNOLOGIES

Presented by Joerg Swetina (NEC)




Steven Leussink, (Dialog) ETSI M2M and DECT ULE

• DECT ULE = Ultra-low energy technology to combine Wireless Sensors

and Voice. ULE mode is add-on, keeps assets of DECT (> 800M devices)

• DECT ULE phase 1 ETSI standard release mid Dec 2012

Philippe Cousin, (EAR-IT) The sound of smart environments

• Advantages of Acoustic sensing: Non Line-of-Sight, Multipurpose..• Advantages of Acoustic sensing: Non Line-of-Sight, Multipurpose..

• Services: Noise monitoring, Traffic flow surveillance, event detection,

localization of outstanding events

• EAR-IT Research Experiment Approach

Yuichi Morioka, (Sony) Low cost LTE for M2M consumer

electronics

• current study in 3GPP on creating a lower cost version of LTE

• For Consumer Electronics critical: cost, mobility, security

• Approach: Reduce bandwidth and transmit power, simplify hardware25 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved


Q: DECT seems to compete with 6LoWPAN (already available)

• A: Similar capabilities, but DECT has already 800 M devices working

• Comment: Interworking specification already under construction

Q: How about the costs of audio detecting devices?

• A: High capability devices (analyzing sound) may be expensive but • A: High capability devices (analyzing sound) may be expensive but

‘intelligence’ could be moved into the gateway

Q: Can e.g. a gun-shot be detected (for public safety)? A: Yes

Q: Low Cost LTE devices available 2017. Why not using GSM?

• A: GSM may disappear. Longevity of solutions cannot be guaranteed.

• Comment: UTRAN may serve as M2M technology too.

Comment: Low Cost LTE will benefit from device-to-device

[LTE] communication currently studied in 3GPP



New and differentiated technologies that are useful for M2M

will gradually appear in standards and markets.

• They will find their place in the markets based on supported features

and price (e.g. long-lasting devices can already be found today, but the

price may be too high for a certain service)

Emerging technologies will need to interwork with existing Emerging technologies will need to interwork with existing

and future standards (interconnect to M2M systems)

� SDOs and fora who are developing these technologies should try to

collaborate with leading M2M standards (ETSI M2M, oneM2M)

�similar technologies might create the need for “Abstraction Layers” in

a global M2M system

� Organization of work: ETSI ISGs (Industry Specification Groups) may

be a good opportunity for doing specification work on emerging

technologies with the professional support of ETSI.


SESSION 6

LOOKING FORWARD (to M2M)

Presented by Marylin ARNDT, Orange, ETSI M2M vice-chair



Presentations in session 6

• The Vigisanté health projects and matters of importance for

M2M applications,

Nicolas Damour, Sierra Wireless

• Clouds as enablers for M2M service provisioning, • Clouds as enablers for M2M service provisioning,

Monique Morrow, Cisco

• Adding virtualisation functionalities to M2M architecture,

Theodore Zahariadis, TEIHAL

© ETSI 2012. All rights reserved29

Take away topics

Highlights :

• common points : R&D projects presenting key issues and challenges

to be addressed by innovation, by industry and by the

standardization bodies, with focus on :

• example of a vertical application with strong requirements : e-

Health / GridHealth / Grid

• how a generic architecture can cope with vertical requirements

• need of abstraction

• need of security, data and privacy protection

• impact of cloud computing as an enabler

• heterogeneity of networks and devices

• complexity management and “make it simple” need.

• Convergence of telecom / ICT : SDOs : IEEE, ITU-T, IETF.



Main key issues :

• security, liability, privacy, regulated environments

Technical challenges

• security, massive data, M2M and cloud enabler,

provisioning, provisioning,

• virtualization, heterogeneous architectures management

Questions :

• What about security and privacy? (they are not exactly the same)

• how to manage the 2 “elephants” in the congress room :

• Network reliability for Cloud

• Trust in the data storage,

and the lifecycle of data ownership.


The (only) way forward

Work Together !


SESSION 7

Synergies

Introduced by Enrico Scarrone, Telecom Italia, ETSI TC M2M Chairman




Duncan Bees CTO and CBO of Home Gateway Initiative

gave an overview of the current work in HGI.

The need for a Smart Home Ecosystem was highlighted

together with the HGI strategy to achieve it

• development of the environment

• APIs/reference points • APIs/reference points

• Device representation with appropriate abstraction

A description of the HGI architecture and current ongong

Activity was given

The need for Cross-SDO collaboration to define device

representation and abstraction and to unify the smart

home ecosystem



Robin Mersh, CEO of Broadband Forum gave an overview of

the main M2M related works in BBF.

Management Plane:

• Data models for ETSI M2M Release 1.0.

• Evolution of M2M networks and paradigms for TR 069• Evolution of M2M networks and paradigms for TR 069

• Work drawing to a conclusion

Control Signaling and Device Abstraction to M2M devices:

• key enabler to service delivery to provide connectivity to growing

ecosystem of devices.

• Cooperation and liaisons with other bodies essential, including ETSI

M2M and potentially finding a common arena for agreements in

oneM2M



Toon Norp of TNO, M2M rapporteur in 3GPP gave an

overview of the current work on System Improvement for

Machine Type Communication.

The M2M Mobile devices expected grow has been

highlighted, focalizing the attention on a set of new highlighted, focalizing the attention on a set of new

functionality supported by the 3GPP mobile networks, among

others:

• Protection against overload by MTC

• Overload and congestion control

• New interface for M2M control

• External identifier

• Triggering

• Group based triggering

• Small data transfer and frequent small data


M2M Devices and Applications are already relying on OMA

DM, but specific M2M challenges are under study.

• Evolving heterogeneous networks supporting M2M devices


Salvatore Scarpina of Telecom Italia, Vice Chair of the Open

Mobile Alliance DM, gave an overview of the current work on

OMA Device Management.

• Evolving heterogeneous networks supporting M2M devices

• Provisioning and Management of constrained devices through

constrained connectivity

• Support of M2M devices through a Gateway

• Support of M2M devices acting as a Gateway

Good collaboration took place with ETSI TC M2M regarding

existing technology

OMA is developing a new strategy to provide concrete

contributions to the oneM2M framework37 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved

Highlight

Major SDOs are already collaborating among them

Device abstraction and modelling is a very high priority

We seek for synergies and complementary solutions rather

then for competition

oneM2M is the arena where this collaboration could be oneM2M is the arena where this collaboration could be

finalized, respecting the autonomy and the competence of

each SDO

M2M system are complex,

there so much work to be done that

collaboration is a must!!!


Possible way forward (1)

Revenue balance M2M small data makes less profit, need low cost apps

Move specification work to the one M2M Partnership

• Boost M2M economies of scale by shortening time-to-market

• Worldwide potential services and business opportunities

• Reduce standardization overlap and provide ongoing standards support

• Semantics is a key piece needed that is missing in the Release 1

Security & PrivacySecurity & Privacy

• Secure data and Identity privacy

• Optimized security management

• Cost of loss / risk of theft vs. the cost of implementing high security

Making the Standard well known & accessible

• INTEROPERABILITY

• Increase the ability of solutions and products to interoperate

• EDUCATION AND PROMOTION

• Tutorials, Best practices, Implementation guidelines

• Real world tangible examples, Better use case documents39 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved


Making the APIs open to implementers on device apps

• STANDARDS / TECHNOLOGY NEXT STEPS

• Keep the API simple!

• Application developers do not need to know about ETSI

• Abstraction and Semantics

• Further study/clarify the role of the gateway

TechnologiesTechnologies

• Choice of lower Layer technologies for M2M devices

• DECT Low power vs. LTE low cost

• Wake up time of the packet transmission

• LTE low latency – needed for road traffic collision avoidance & critical smart

grid applications

• 2G Continuation or Legacy / 3G Middle Ground / 4G cost reduction

Synergies

• HGI Connecting Homes + Enabling Services

• BBF & OMA defining Device Management, interoperability & abstraction


Only way forward

Work Together !


SESSION 8

WRAP UP AND OPEN DISCUSSIONPresented by Ray Forbes, ETSI TC M2M WG3 Chair, Telefon AB LM Ericsson




Revenue balance M2M small data makes less profit, need low cost apps

Move specification work to the one M2M Partnership

• Boost M2M economies of scale by shortening time-to-market

• Worldwide potential services and business opportunities

• Reduce standardization overlap and provide ongoing standards support

• Semantics is a key piece needed that is missing in the Release 1

Security & PrivacySecurity & Privacy

• Secure data and Identity privacy

• Optimized security management

• Cost of loss / risk of theft vs. the cost of implementing high security

Making the Standard well known & accessible

• INTEROPERABILITY

• Increase the ability of solutions and products to interoperate

• EDUCATION AND PROMOTION

• Tutorials, Best practices, Implementation guidelines

• Real world tangible examples, Better use case documents43 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved


Making the APIs open to implementers on device apps

• STANDARDS / TECHNOLOGY NEXT STEPS

• Keep the API simple!

• Application developers do not need to know about ETSI

• Abstraction and Semantics

• Further study/clarify the role of the gateway

TechnologiesTechnologies

• Choice of lower Layer technologies for M2M devices

• DECT Low power vs. LTE low cost

• Wake up time of the packet transmission

• LTE low latency – needed for road traffic collision avoidance & critical smart

grid applications

• 2G Continuation or Legacy / 3G Middle Ground / 4G cost reduction

Synergies

• HGI Connecting Homes + Enabling Services

• BBF & OMA defining Device Management, interoperability & abstraction


Only way forward

Work Together !


SESSION 1 - ETSI › Workshop › 2012 › 201210_M2M... · Operators need to consider the user...

Documents

Transcript of SESSION 1 - ETSI › Workshop › 2012 › 201210_M2M... · Operators need to consider the user...